User talk:Rcmurphy/archive8

Cheers

...for the Ninjastar. I have two now - I can use one to cut vandal's heads off while using the other to trim my toenails. Handy! RabbiTechno 18:51, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Awwww how could you

You deleted my picture waaaaaaaah!!

Not that we only allow tasteful images here, but the one you uploaded was definitely toeing the line. —rc (t) 20:16, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Aye, I admit it was a bit rude You don't think that was actually dog sex do you? Hope not :|

Er, I actually don't like to think about it at all, if that's all right. —rc (t) 22:45, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Alright, Richard

I probably wasn't around to vote against this, you know where the voting topic is? (edit:not that I'm going to vote now, I just want to see people's reasons and the like. 14:41, 9 June 2007 (UTC)) —Braydie 14:32, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

It's here. And don't call me Shirley. I mean Richard. —rc (t) 15:57, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

But, Richard is a nice name, Richard. (Thank you, and how have you been?) —Braydie 12:43, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

All right - just watching my summer slip away from me as usual. And yourself? —rc (t) 16:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

My fine self is fine, watching the summer slip away from me as well. —Braydie 00:40, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Same old. Maybe I should get off the internet. —rc (t) 05:23, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Autograph

You have about one of the top most important jobs here: editing the featured article template. For that, I insist that you sign my Autograph page. I would really appreciated this favour. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works

Signed! Thanks, it's an honor. :D —rc (t) 14:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

VFH

Hiya, Mr. VFH guy. I understand that you're the big cheese around these parts when it comes to highlight. Thusly, I feel it only fair to direct your attention to my forum post regarding a change in VFH paradigm. Please take a little while to get acquainted with the new idea as well as my tentative sandbox regarding this change.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:57, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Interesting - it would definitely make the process more elegant. I'm going to play around with it a bit and I'll get back to you (or more probably post in the Forum topic). —rc (t) 23:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Glad to hear you like it. Have a field day with it, I've got the basic coding there already, but please don't hesitate to fix. It is your thing anyway.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:46, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

I have a solution that will allow for all VFH nominations to be simultaneously added to a master page (which I believe should be protected upon the trial run of this). However, I need to ask a question about some code. Is there a way to make <inputbox> create two pages?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:22, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Unfortunately I don't know the answer - you should probably ask Algorithm or Spang. I am, alas, technically impaired when it comes to coding. —rc (t) 00:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Alright, well, I've got a new fix idea going on. It will make everything more automated and generally easier. It does quite a few things. For example, the list of all noms is completely automated right now. Also, once Wikia gets off its lazy ass and updates <DPL>, I believe that we'll have a page that preloads all of the current voting tables. One week is the tentative date for this implementation, and once I do and fix up the code a bit, then this may be ready for a pilot run.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:44, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

All right - just let me know when you've got stuff hammered out and I'll take a looksy. —rc (t) 03:09, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

We got updated, so here we go. What you're going to want to do to test is this. When you go into the code of User:Ljlego/VFH you'll see <DPL> tags. What is in there defines how the pages are sorted. Right now it's by "firstedit." This sorts it by page creation, and this setting can be tinkered to your liking. Just let me know what you may want. It is also ordered in ascending or descending order. This will allow you to practically do the "Upside-down Saturdays" thing should you choose to (by simply changing the "order=" from ascending to descending and vice versa). Let me know what you think. I also tinkered with the vote table code, so create a new nomination and take a look-see at that. Turns out the tinkered code sucked. Forget I said that. But creating a new nomination would still be a good idea. Let me know what you think either here or on my talk page (your preference).-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 14:50, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

All right then - I'll look at it today when I have some time. —rc (t) 16:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Do you intend to have a simple list of nominated articles (a la the Dump) or to list the nom templates like you have it set up now? The current style list is exactly what I need to tally votes, but I presume that'll be moved to a separate page to keep the load times for the VFH portal fast? —rc (t) 04:19, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

I notice the current layout doesn't bump like the forum setup (Note my recent vote on Hermaphradite). -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:22, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Well, here's the thing. I've been thinking, and it seems as if people are not happy with the idea of VFH being like the Dump. This format still uses the separate pages bit, but then includes them on the main page. I could always make both and take a vote. As for TKF's statement, I could make it like that, but then again I don't think I'd want to. However, again, we could always vote on it. There's a whole cache of untapped possibilities for this, and if you say the word I'll find out if (and if so, how) I can do it.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:50, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

I think it's time for a forum topic!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:18, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

HAMBURGER!

The Fortune Cookie pic got 8.5 points on VFP. FEATURE TODAY! --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 08:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

By my count it only has +7. —rc (t) 16:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

THANK'D!!

REJOICE!
You have received the
Double-Douser's Award
for exemplary utilization of boiling, scorchingly hot water.

Thank you for helping make
Why?:Pour Boiling Hot Water Down Your Trousers?
the most strongly favored article in Uncyclopedia history!

You didn't vote, but I dig what you do, so have one anyway!! ;) --THINKER 07:24, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! I actually indulge in a little boiling-water-in-the-pants daily. —rc (t) 16:03, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Poo Lit Surprise Judging

Glad to see you've volunteered! Now's your chance to sign up for your preferred Category, whichever that may be. Head over to the project page and put your name down where you want it. Thanks in advance. I'll be keeping in touch over the course of the competition, so stay tuned and feel free to hit me up on my talk page should you need to. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 16:04, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

In for the last Best Article slot! —rc (t) 16:22, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Wiki Research

Thanks for your completed survey. Sutton4019 13:45, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

One year ago today

Ok, done and working. See the example here. This way doesn't require any extra pages to be created, now or in the future (as long as the FA template and procedure stays the same), and accounts for the gap when we featured once every 2 days. The format and wording can change however you like. It could also automatically include a bit of the text of the article if you like, the first 10 words or something.

The only problems with it so far are that it won't work currently on pages that don't use the standard {{FH}} template, or use the standard date format (like AAAAAAAAA!, for example). But those articles are easily found and easily fixed by adding a modified and hidden FA template to the article.

Also, <technical stuff> because the dpl extension can't put the page name in an external link properly or a template, and the old revision id can't go in a normal wiki link </technical stuff>, though it links to the featured revision, and that featured revision is what you see, mediawiki thinks that it's the Main Page, or (now) Uncyclopedia:Thisisabugdonteditthispage, and all the tabs at the top link to that page. Editing the old revision will also give you the text from the old revision, but save it to that different page when you press save. Which is odd. It might be better in a way to be unable to save the old revision linked from the main page anyway.

Well there you go. What was the other thing I was supposed to be doing? • Spang • ☃ • talk • 05:04, 29 Jun 2007

Brilliant! I'll implement it today. Probably. What kinds of modifications have to be made for the special FA template?

As for the other thing, was it the VFH revamp? Or possibly a paid vacation to Vanuatu? —rc (t) 19:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Okay, it should be working properly now. I don't think I broke anything in the process. —rc (t) 20:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Cool, well I'll probably be able to just did modify the FA template so you can add hidden=true to it to hide it and just include the important bits, and that'd make it all work fine. So it'd look like {{FA|revision=12345|date=DD MMMM YYYY|hidden=true}} on binary or whatever.

Hmmm, paid break or more coding? Tough choice to be sure. Wait, what do I get paid? Nothing?! I'm going on strike. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 08:56, 29 Jun 2007

You don't get paid? I guess that's only for the more experienced Uncyc admins... —rc (t) 21:46, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Devil Man!

Yeah, I saw you do it... Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 06/29 20:44

Look, just because I happened to remove a certain number of characters from a page, and just because I have horns, and just because I can change my form at will, doesn't necessarily mean anything. —rc (t) 21:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm laying this at your feet

• Well, as it happens, I may not be around tonight for the turning of the month. I did, however, make that pretty little logo that I mentioned to you on IRC. So, if you could, could you place this in the driver's seat during your nightly rounds of featuring and award handing -- The Zombiebaron 20:29, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Yep, I'll get 'er done. Assuming I remember... which is always iffy. —rc (t) 22:19, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Well, I assumed that I would just go ahead and do it, for reasons unexplained. -- The Zombiebaron 02:34, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Also acceptable. —rc (t) 03:41, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

PLS Bribe

Kingkitty Is Bribing You.

Pick my article as the best of PLS and I'll split my $20 with you.

--Kingkitty 23:09, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I cannot compromise my integrity on this issue. Every time I've judged the PLS I've used an objective evaluation technique (coin toss) to decide a winner and I will not be swayed from giving each entry an equal chance at winning. —rc (t) 04:20, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

RC USES LOADED COINS! RC USES LOADED COINS!!!!!!!! FRAUD FREUD FRAD1!1!!!!!1111111 :D --THINKER 04:23, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Rc adds The Thinker to his naughty list —rc (t) 04:27, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

As a side note, Image:82cents.jpg is one of my favourite images on uncyc, just for the history. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 05:48, 04 Jul 2007

Best of...

I pre-started the Best of July, so that we don't get behind again. When you feature a page, just add it to this one. This should save time at the end of the month. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:48, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

"Password, shmassword. I'll still be reading it. Moo ha-ha!"

Has Braydie given up on the peoject? —rc (t) 16:34, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

I dunno. Braydie didn't do June. I did June...on the third. "Now Braydie is all about the drugs and the booze and the girls. Fame changed him, man. It used to be about the pages." That's from the VH1 special Behind the Braydie. Not to be confused with the adult film of the same title. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Hm, all right. I'll try to remember to move them each night. —rc (t) 03:43, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep this up and you might finally earn Noob of the Month. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:59, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Don't tell anybody, but I plan to retire when I finally win NotM. If other people knew I'd be gone come August. —rc (t) 04:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Your secret is safe with me...and everybody else who is reading this. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:13, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

I can't wait for Mediawiki 10.7's password-protected talk pages. —rc (t) 04:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

My connection is slow right now and it took a few seconds for that image to load, and when it did... let's just say it was like an 80s slasher film death sequence. Anticipation, surprise, horror. —rc (t) 04:54, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Protect

Are you able to fully protect my user page? If so, is the author still able to edit his own page that is protected? If the author can't edit his fully protected page, than can you semi-protect my user page? This is because I'd feel safer with it being locked so people can't edit it and make bad changes. Thanks!--Sir Manforman 13:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

I semiprotected it. Nobody except admins can edit a fully protected page, even if it's your userpage. —rc (t) 15:45, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a bunch! Can you also Semi-Protect and Fully-Move-Protect the following:

• User:Manforman (I know you Semi-Protected this one but you never Fully-Move-Protected It)
• User talk:Manforman (I don't want IPs messing around with it)
• User talk:Manforman/Archive 1 (Fully Protect This One, I don't want any adjustments made to it)
• User:Manforman/Userboxes
• User:Manforman/Menu
• User:Manforman/sig
• User:Manforman/Images
• User:Manforman/Art
• User:Manforman/YouTube Videos
• User:Manforman/Articles
• User:Manforman/Thank You (Fully Protect This One, I'm not going to adjust this one anymore)

--Sir Manforman 16:08, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Protecting userpages is okay, but other than that I usually only protect pages that are verifiably at risk of being vandalized. User subpages are probably safe. —rc (t) 02:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank You

Sonic80 has awarded you a magnifying glass of which you, too, may use to get thousands of dollars, in government subsidies for insect torture research.

-- --_{Mgr. Sir} Sonic80^☭ 16:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

PLS Judging Instructions: Have a Gander

I'm sending you this because you are signed up to judge the Poo Lit Surprise. If there has been some accident or mistake, and you no longer want to judge, please tell me as soon as possible. If you're still good to go, here are the instructions. First, read all the articles in your specified category. Second, judge them. Judge how you like, as long as it's at least somewhat fair and based on merit. And C, post your top 5 articles here, in order: User:ENeGMA/PLS Judging Hit me up on my talk page should these rules not cognizate within you. Thank you again for your continued cooperation in the balletic train wreck that is the Poo Lit Surprise. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:26, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

All right, I'll get on that straightaway. I usually skip the first two steps so you should have my ballot by tomorrow morning. —rc (t) 02:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Protection

Can you at least semi-protect and fully-move-protect these (These, I want protected the most):

• User:Manforman (I know you Semi-Protected this one but you never Fully-Move-Protected It)
• User talk:Manforman (I don't want IPs messing around with it)
• User talk:Manforman/Archive 1 (Fully Protect This One, I don't want any adjustments made to it)--Sir Manforman 12:25, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but unless there is a demonstrable need, protection for pages like that isn't really necessary. And I don't really think talk pages should ever be protected. —rc (t) 17:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Re. Protection

OK, It appears to me any registered user can move my user page. I'd like my user page to be move-protected so only sysops can move it. Thanks!--Sir Manforman 22:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Is there a particular reason you're worried about your userpage? Even the userpages of the highest-profile users, like admins, get vandalized only rarely. —rc (t) 01:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

I'd just feel safer with it being locked.--Sir Manforman 12:16, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

I feel like this would only cause problems later on. What if you decide you want to edit your userpage and you can't find an admin to unlock it? —rc (t) 22:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't want my user page to be fully protected. I want it to be fully-move-protected (like your user page). That's all. But I'd like User talk:Manforman/Archive 1 to be fully-protected (to be preserved in it's original condition). Thanks--Sir Manforman 22:49, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure you're being paranoid, but I protected them. —rc (t) 00:17, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

You're too easy....:D-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:46, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm getting soft at my old age... —rc (t) 01:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Nah, I'm not paranoid, I just like it that way. But thanks anyways!--Sir Manforman 12:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

I wouldn't worry about being paranoid. It's not like any other admins here would edit your protected pages, or unprotect them and see how long it takes you to notice. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 07/11 14:28

....no way.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

VFH

Nope, I just can't leave you alone about this. However, I have good reason for what I'm doing. It seems from the vote that the new VFH paradigm shift is well-liked (at least by people who frequent the Village Dump or the VFH page). We should give the topic about three more days, see what other responses we get. Then, we have to decide which to use as the frontpage. I personally think the full VFH should be used as the front, and the summary can used by you to determine what to kill. I'll get on one-click code for that (on the summary page, as Spang's done it on the tables already) when I'm done. Also, we have to figure out when we're going to protect VFH and make the switch. Unlike with VFP's switch, this is a big thing that needs to be done in one fell swoop. It's going to take a little bit of manpower, but we can do it in a timely fashion, I think. I'd say once we close the vote, that night, at time of feature, you protect the page, copy the nomination and DPL code, and start moving tables. I'd do it myself, but I haven't the ability to protect pages nor the desire to do something that drastic to your baby. Reply here, let me know what you think.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

I did have the feature/remove links on both pages, but it seems I accidentally took them out at some point. Anyway, those links use the same .featurecode class as the VFH template, so only you (or anyone else who adds it) should be able to see that. To mark an article as featured, just click "feature" and then press save, and that should be all you need to do on the VFH page. "Remove" does similar, but with the correct categories. You might want to play with the mock-up version first a bit.

Oh, and (seeing as it's getting a good response from the forum) when we do implement it, the nominations are going to have to be copied across to sub-pages from bottom to top, in order, to keep their order the same. I suppose I'll volunteer for that. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:29, 09 Jul 2007

I'll help.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

I experimented with the prototype a bit and I think I get how it works, mostly (at least, I understand all the stuff I need to know). I still think the summary should be the initial VFH page, but it's not that big a deal, especially if other people don't have loading issues. So it looks good to go in a couple days. —rc (t) 17:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

I have a silly request, so long as we're fiddling with this and finalizing things. Is there a way to highlight something that's received no for votes in two weeks? This would make stagnation removal easier. Not that it's hard now, understand, but... well... I'm lazy.--<<>> 23:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm sure there is. But I am le tired. So I will have a nap, then fire ze missiles make a sad attempt. Ask Spang on his talk, too.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:45, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

A "last edit" column or line could be put in, but only at the expense of the "nomination age" column on the summary page. It might be possible to put the last edit date on the full page, and highlight it if it's older than a certain amount, but that would probably affect load times, and there's no way for it to tell the difference between fors and againsts, aside from the pure numbers. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:18, 11 Jul 2007

Protected version of Hippie Chick

I know that I am being petty, but just before the Hippie Chick was elevated to Front Page status - and I am eternally greatful for this honor - User: G0m made two really stupid edits to the article. Can those two edits get deleted from the protected version - they add nothing to the content and would qualify as vandalism in my book. Hugs! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:31, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Do you mean the featured version? The page isn't protected, and G0m made his edits after I put the featured article template on the page. I rolled back his edits, and the featured link should always go to the correct revision. So I think things are in order. —rc (t) 04:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

PLS

Hey Rc. My PLS entry, Game:Your Computer, is a game, and thus spans several pages. However, Braydie only protected the first one. I tried asking him, but he hasn't been on in days. Could you please protect it for me? Thanks. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 16:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

All right, I think I got them all. —rc (t) 17:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a million! — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:47, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

When you update Template:Featuredarticle...

Maybe you could sometimes also update Template:DidYouKnow (a.k.a "Do You Care")? --L 15:27, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, I'll try to remember to update once in a while, but I make no promises. I tend to forget things like that. —rc (t) 02:11, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm trying to figure out the method by which you've been updating the template since the options aren't in chronological order. Is everything up through Old Hippie Chick represented already? —rc (t) 05:47, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Method? Mostly I've been adding lines which were originally in Template:DYK and happened to link to a Featured Article. That, and arbitrary selections from Uncyclopedia:Best of.

What I do know is that most of 2006 is missing, and I'm not entirely sure that it was consistently updated in 2005 either. --L 08:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

That reminds me - someone should semiunprotect Barns and Nobles, perhaps?--L 09:05, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

When I find some time enthusiasm, I'll make a list of all featured articles not represented in Do You Care and try to work up captions for them. —rc (t) 16:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

List here. —rc (t) 20:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Understanding Big Brother

I've had a go at making my PLS article easier to understand and was just wondering if there are any specific words or phrases that you had difficulty reading. Thanks. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  11:11, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Nothing in particular. I'm just not that well versed in text speak, which I know is at the heart of your article so you can't exactly avoid it. —rc (t) 04:10, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Atomic Mass

Hey, thanks a lot for the congratulations. I'm glad you enjoyed the article so much! It completely blew me away to see it win the PLS, though, since I submitted it in a rush at the last minute, and at first I didn't think it was as good as some of my other articles. Thanks for proving me wrong! I can't thank you enough for your support. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 06:35, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

No problem! Thank you for writing something so entertaining. —rc (t) 16:35, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

You Judges the PLS! And you didn't fuck it up! Congratulations!

Thanks for taking the time out of your busy schedule to read articles for me for no pay. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 20:25, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

I judges joyfully! You welcome always. —rc (t) 23:55, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

NotM

You may finally have it in the bag! Hooah!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:00, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

All I have to do is delete any new nominations and hope nobody notices! Fingers crossed! —rc (t) 19:06, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Or, even better, ban anyone who notices. Then they can't complain either.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Unless they take it to email. That's the worst. —rc (t) 21:31, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks again for nomming the article in the first place, not to mention your accompanying vote! I really appreciate the support. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 05:03, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother's articles. Cheers, mate. —rc (t) 05:48, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

:D.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:49, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

:D

For being the first admin to ban the Nigger Cunt vandal in under a half hour, you are hereby deemed "competent". -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:11, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Hm, I'm going to have to slack off more to get back down to my usual "mediocre." —rc (t) 20:16, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Please change my name

Can you please change my name from Edmundkh to EdmundEzekielMahmudIsa, then leave me a message in the English Wikipedia? Thank you very much! --Edmund the King of the Woods! 12:19, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Responded on Wikipedia. —rc (t) 03:38, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Comrade

Thank you for supporting me for dictatorship at the VFS. Now my diabolical scheme for domination can commence. You Are A True Comrade. ~

A moment of your time?

Hi, i'm trying to find good stuff for the Uncyclopedia:Bureaucrats article to save it from being deleted. I figured that an interview with an actual bureaucrat would fit in nicely. Would you mind one? If not, thank you for reading this. Conniving 19:24, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Sure sure! I'd be happy to. Give me some tough questions. —rc (t) 22:03, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Err, mind going to my talk page for this? It's easier for me to notice that way, like a PM. Conniving 22:24, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

More have been posted. Admittedly, i'm running out of ideas. If I do think up any more questions, i'll tell you. And don't forget to check the Uncyclopedia:Bureaucrats article. I've already started posting things. Conniving 23:48, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

All righty. You might ask some other bureaus and use the best answers for the article if you want a wider range. —rc (t) 23:58, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

I added two more questions. And i've asked the other bureaucrats. You're the only one to answer back so far. On Keitei's page, Mhaille said that they were inactive. Conniving 00:03, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi

I don't know if you honestly did it but when you gave me admin and crat it didn't work. OneCoolKid 00:40, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Hm, how odd. I'll look into the system and jiggle some handles when I get the chance. —rc (t) 05:10, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Kudos...

...on helping out with Conniving's rewrite. You're the cheese on the burger of comedy. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 00:41, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Don't know if he saw, but there's just a few more questions on my talk page. Conniving 00:47, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Rc sees all, a side effect, methinks, of being a brain in a jar. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 00:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

I guess he got tired of it. Crap! To think, there were only two more.... >_< Conniving 00:54, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Sorry! I had "real life" to deal with. I'll get on those last two straightaway. And being the cheese is all right, but I'd rather be the little bits of automobile tire that you get in school cafeteria burgers. They add texture. And that's what I'd like to think I bring to Uncyc... texture. And idiocy. —rc (t) 04:59, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for sticking to the automobile theme of the page. :) Conniving 12:44, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Has Template:Fundraiser been added to the notice yet?

I haven't seen it anywhere yet... --L 03:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

It was, but zombiebaron removed it without giving a reason I saw anywhere. Maybe you should ask him. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:15, 02 Nov 2007

Aww nuts! We gotta unlock Template:Fundraiser again!

Look at what those bottoms have done now! And I was just getting desensitised to their old template. --L 06:11, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

(Well, actually, let's just use Template:Fundraiser2.)

Done. —rc (t) 07:31, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Oh, wait a minute! That people-meter bar that Fundraiser2 uses is actually milking bandwidth directly from Wikimedia. I forgot to replace it with an Uncyclopedia-hosted copy that I just made right now (Image:Donation_meter2.png). Oops. Oh, and could you replace the "Donate now" link with Image:Donation_button.png, please?

Somebody got there before me. —rc (t) 19:15, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

I hate it when that happens. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Selling the Uncyclopedia Logo

I'm creating a CafePress Shop about Uncyclopedia and decided to use the designs on the shop page. Can I have permission to use the Potato Logo and how can I get in touch to give you a share of the profits? --NXWave 21:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

I actually released the potato logo under a less restrictive license (see here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Uncyclopedia.png - uploaded by Splarka but under my direction) - GFDL/CC-BY-SA, meaning it can be used for commercial purposes by anyone. However, you can't use the word "uncyclopedia" because the name is owned by Wikia. But the potato is free game. —rc (t) 18:55, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

When adding quotes on QDB...

...Please remember to check them before approving!! --AAA! (AAAA) 06:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

If that was the quote referring to Starnes' Jewness, I consider that a perfectly legitimate entry. —rc (t) 15:02, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

:)

No way, I'm putting it right at the top, and there's nothing you can do about it. But serious, how's it going? —Braydie 18:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

All right, all right. I haven't been editing much... still a bit more immersed in the physical world lately. And yourself? —rc (t) 20:19, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Same really, that real life is such a bitch. Anything interesting going on there for you? —Braydie 23:35, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Graduation in a few months. Then... my world tour! —rc (t) 00:27, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

:O which cities/countries? :O —Braydie 01:58, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Make sure Oklahoma is one of the places, because I haven't creeped my wife out with online people showing up at my house enough.--<<>> 23:49, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, when I say "world tour" I mean hopefully I'll get a position studying or teaching abroad next year, location very much undetermined. And Brad, I've already been to your house many times. You've never wondered where those footprints outside your bedroom window came from? —rc (t) 20:53, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

!!!--<<>> 22:50, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank ye!

Thekillerfroggy would like to thank you for voting him to be an admin! The "former": sockpuppet-maker drama-creating-hate-machine Vanity-creator (left) cannot be more obliged... it really shows you care.