- Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
- Voters: Please try and include some kind of reasoning. When voting against, explain where the article falls short so that the author can perhaps try and fix it up and improve it.
- This is not a discussion page. If you'd like detailed feedback on your article, please submit it for a PeeReview.
- Want a gadget that lets you mark the articles you've already voted on? Follow the instructions here to enable it.
- View recent changes for VFH here, and if deleted nominations are showing up and that bugs you, click here to purge the list.
- Due to a technical glitch caused by DPL being a dumbass, any signature with two dashes (i.e. "--") will cause the VFH page to go kaput.
Any and all violators of policy will be squashed by a 0 ton block of lead.
VFH status:
5.0E+128 votes per article • Goal: 5
Search VFH archive
VFH is not a discussion page. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.
All nominated articles
(feature) (remove)
Vote
|
Score: 1
|
Nomination:
|
ShabiDOO 13:50, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 1
|
- For
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
(feature) (remove)
Vote
|
Score: 5
|
Nomination:
|
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump • 17:20, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 5
|
- I was disappointed when they told me this was just, "Satire", because this is a genius business idea! This could generate millions, if not billions, in revenue.
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump • 17:20, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
For.  17:48, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
For. Mr. George / talk 19:14, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
For. Surprised this hasn't been featured earlier. Norb (talk) 22:34, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Fucking genius. Feature this fucker! ShabiDOO 13:09, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
(feature) (remove)
Vote
|
Score: 3.5 dollars gleefully given to the Gub'mint
|
Nomination:
|
yesterday was tax day and it reminded me this exists 168.11.96.2 (talk) 18:02, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 4.5
|
- nom and for and stuff 168.11.96.2 (talk) 18:02, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
For. Definitely not torture. MrX blow me 21:44, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
For.  17:57, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
For. Mr. George / talk 18:07, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- Have edited much of the article. ShabiDOO 13:22, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 1
|
Oppose The article could use some updating (the latest date mentioned is 2006) and some significant copyediting. Norb (talk) 18:34, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
|
(feature) (remove)
Vote
|
Score: 0 -1,000,000,000,000,000............,000.5 (I forgot)
|
Nomination:
|
(joke)(Also a joke) Not featured enough, must nominate. (Also not featured enough (Joke nomination)). — L10nM4st3r ROAR at me! / What my paws scratched 14:12, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 1.0E+129
|
For. (JK) Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 14:35, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- I love it (my vote counts as a zillion) ShabiDOO 21:47, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
For. actually this is a good idea I guess in my opinion (which is usually the wrong opinion) 168.11.96.2 (talk) 11:49, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
For. I AM THE ONE. THE LEGENDARY TIEBREAKER. AS THE PROPHECY FORTOLD. I HAVE COME TO VOTE TO NOMINATE THIS ARTICLE. ALL UNCYCLOPEDIANS WORSHIP AT MY FEET! ANYONE WHO DARES VOTE AGAINST ME SHALL EXPERIENCE THE WRATH OF 10,000 FURIOUS LIONS! Coffi (talk) 03:42, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Not redundant enough. Please make your message more redundant. Your message doesn't repeat what it says. All must be redundant. Redundantly, from your redundant L10nM4ST3R! — L10nM4st3r ROAR at me! / What my paws scratched 06:14, 26 April 2025 (UTC) Redundant
Yes, maybe. I don't know, this vote probably doesn't matter.  17:53, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 1.0E+129
|
Against. (Also JK) Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 14:35, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- I hate it (my vote counts as a zillion) ShabiDOO 21:47, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Against. (Also JK) This has already be featured. It's basically redundancy. My face is beautiful, so is the rest of me! 05:17, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
|
See also