- Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
- Voters: Please try and include some kind of reasoning. When voting against, explain where the article falls short so that the author can perhaps try and fix it up and improve it.
- This is not a discussion page. If you'd like detailed feedback on your article, please submit it for a PeeReview.
- Want a gadget that lets you mark the articles you've already voted on? Follow the instructions here to enable it.
- View recent changes for VFH here, and if deleted nominations are showing up and that bugs you, click here to purge the list.
- Due to a technical glitch caused by DPL being a dumbass, any signature with two dashes (i.e. "--") will cause the VFH page to go kaput.
Any and all violators of policy will be lightsaber'd.
VFH status:
5.92 votes per article • Goal: 5
Search VFH archive
VFH is not a discussion page. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.
All nominated articles
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
|
Score: 6 shitty pages
|
| Nomination:
|
๐ gergdown๐(talk) ๐ 01:23, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 6
|
 I might be one of the funniest Uncyclopedians, maybe even the funniest. All my friends would tell you that I'm the dumbest Uncyclopedian, the worst Uncyclopedian. I'd say that I'm stopping this presidential gag for his own sake! ๐ gergdown๐(talk) ๐ 01:23, 14 January 2026 (UTC) For. Mr. George  / talk 11:06, 14 January 2026 (UTC)- FUCK YEAH!!! ShabiDOO 13:46, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- For. HEY, dundalk MD? Woah that's not too far, I'll... uh, be riiiight back :3
 Lucyna Kushinada (-sent from the moon) โฎ` ๐ ๐ด๐ถ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ธ๐ ๐ `โฎ 15:44, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
- For. Very clear summary, I can finally comprehend the entire series now. Thank you. OrdinaryJoe1234 (talk) 21:49, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
- For. Wow, this is a work art! I would vote ten times if I could, which you can, although that just means another admin would have to manually remove the 9 other votes, which is crazy, because what if your opinion really is worth 10 times that of the average person?
 Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump โข 03:23, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
 Comment. SIDENOTE: "You are dump, I am shart" originally resonated from Forum:Gerg's Villian Arc but it's more of a punchline that I made up for my other project that just so happened to end up here on Uncyclopedia. Therefore, please, PLEASE associate that joke with this article. I do to, and you shall as well! If you really hate it that much, I'll rewrite it. ๐ gergdown๐(talk) ๐ 01:23, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
 Abstain. you do seem to forget some things, don't you?  General Turb0-Sunrise of Boston 01:28, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- Comment. gene wofle
  Boner. Napalm Yankeesees! 02:49, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- This is one of the best comment threads I've seen in VFH. ๐ gergdown๐(talk) ๐ 03:21, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
|
(feature) (remove)
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
|
Score: 2
|
| Nomination:
|
Sovietโญ (Ask for free votes) 18:23, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 7
|
- For. Sovietโญ (Ask for free votes) 18:23, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
- ShabiDOO 19:49, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
- i hab a stronk reeding this uhhhhhhh Lucyna Kushinada (-sent from the moon) โฎ` ๐ ๐ด๐ถ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ธ๐ ๐ `โฎ 12:38, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- For. i love puns Schism (talk) 21:44, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- You know what? Fuck it. ๐ gergdown๐(talk) ๐ 21:45, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- For. Mr. George / talk 21:58, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- To quote snake,"You're pretty good.." Lieutenant Gamma
 Here, Friend, have some meth. 03:07, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 5
|
 Against.  23:50, 29 December 2025 (UTC)- Against. Take this back to the Encyclopedia Dramatica, man... User:OrdinaryJoe1234 20:23, 2 January 2026
- Against. I Chuckled at it, but I wouldn't call it feature material. Oแญรถแแแแ
 You snooze, you lose, Squaw Deer! (vandalize my talk page) 02:43, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah no. i'm also testing this new gadget. Turb0-Sunrise de la YANKEES SUCK! 16:32, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- After much thought, perhaps, the mostest, muchest thoughts a person thinking could ever conceive of thinking, I have decided to vote AGAINST! Thank you for your attention to this matter! Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump โข 06:40, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
P.S. I actually do visit Encyclopedia Dramatica occasionally, and this looks nothing like an actual ED article. For those of you who don't know, the primary purpose of ED is to document memes and Internet drama, but yes, they do fill with gore, racism, anti-Semitism, etc. And most articles have a giant gallery of porn related to the article's subject at the bottom of the page. For the lulz. OแญรถแแแแYou snooze, you lose, Squaw Deer! (vandalize my talk page) 02:43, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- Comment. I mean, really, I get Uncyclopedia is a place for satire, but is it a place for hate? OrdinaryJoe1234 (talk) 21:50, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
- @OrdinaryJoe1234: Is Uncyclopedia a place for hate? no, it isn't. but this article isn't hating on anybody; if anything, it's mocking the hate. just because a piece of literature showcases something unethical doesn't mean that it's supporting it; that'd be like saying that books like Maus or The Boy in Stripped Pajamas supports nazism because they have nazis as characters. so I don't really understand your question. ๐๐๐DaniPine3 (talk)๐๐๐ 22:21, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
- Hate? This is all clearly satire. Have you lost your shabi-minds? Uncyclopedia isn't a safe space. This place is littered with offensive articles and it is clearly satire. Did you not notice in the article how the young kids are clearly being brainwashed depite having friends they are being talked into disliking? Holocaust tycoon is one of the sites most successful article. It is also clearly satire. No subject, none at all, is taboo here. This article is not hate. Yikes. ShabiDOO 23:54, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
|
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
|
Score: 3
|
| Nomination:
|
ShabiDOO 12:07, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 3
|
- ShabiDOO 12:07, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
- For. Mr. George / talk 11:30, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
- For. Eh, sure, why not ๐ gergdown๐(talk) ๐ 22:44, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
- im too scared to vote on this one, i get the feeling there's a sword at my neck already... Lucyna Kushinada (-sent from the moon) โฎ` ๐ ๐ด๐ถ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ธ๐ ๐ `โฎ 19:38, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Abstain. I'm going to take a principled stand and abstain for now! Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump โข 00:31, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
Really puzzled over the hesitancy for people to vote on this. This article is a lot less punchy or offensive than a dozen other articles I have written and featured. However, the people have spoken. Some feedback from anyone would be appreciated. ShabiDOO 10:01, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
|
(feature) (remove)
(feature) (remove)
See also
Old VFH archives:
1 โข
2 โข
3 โข
4 โข
5 โข
6 โข
7 โข
8 โข
9 โข
10 โข
11 โข
12 โข
13 โข
14
I might be one of the funniest Uncyclopedians, maybe even the funniest. All my friends would tell you that I'm the dumbest Uncyclopedian, the worst Uncyclopedian. I'd say that I'm stopping this presidential gag for his own sake! 
For. 
Comment. SIDENOTE: 
Abstain. you do seem to forget 
Against. the page formatting is kinda unhinged and makes it very hard to read, I do like the acccent but that def doesn't help readability... needs copyedits up the wazoo for all those broken links 
