Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
Voters: Please try and include some kind of reasoning. When voting against, explain where the article falls short so that the author can perhaps try and fix it up and improve it.
This is not a discussion page. If you'd like detailed feedback on your article, please submit it for a PeeReview.
Want a gadget that lets you mark the articles you've already voted on? Follow the instructions here to enable it.
For. People keep saying Jimmy's a bad guy, I think it's up to interpretation! I think he did the best he could, given the circumstances... Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump • 06:31, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0.5
Half against. unsure how to say this, but the plot and story sections are almost word for word how it actually plays out, and that makes up 95% of the entire article. A little TOO accurate, kinda like the bill clinton nom MKyap!Fðllðw Ðåmågê †råïl 12:37, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Comments
Abstain. Fuck Mouthwashing, but I can't in good faith vote against this when I was behind the Bill Clinton nom. AtomicAnon (talk) 17:38, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment. To clarify, the edits by the MUGA team were almost exclusively technical ones to get the UnGame running again (along with fighting a glitch which kept deleting text from the text area). MUGA Intern Sandeep (talk) 16:13, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
For. can confirm: both times i was given an orchid they had to complain about how expensive they were for 5 minutes MKyap!Fðllðw Ðåmågê †råïl 17:56, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
For. More Native American history they don't teach in school anymore. MrXblow me 19:39, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Orchids. Hell yeah AtomicAnon (talk) 20:06, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Half for. I did not laugh or smirk, but I figure it is because I am more jaded about these kinds of articles. New readers might find it more amusing. ~GoatLordServa/enttalk 11:59, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Doug I love this as an homage to the fantastic book, but at the same time... this is just word for word the literal book. MKyap!Fðllðw Ðåmågê †råïl 01:21, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment. Doug Doug Doug Doug Doug fingers Doug Dougdeemox 12:34, 11 March 2026 (UTC) deemox 12:34, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment. I did not realize this was going to be so controversial. I kind of just nom my articles as an alternative to pee review as that doesn't really seem to have anyone actually using it. This one is very funny though. deemox 17:01, 11 March 2026 (UTC) deemox 17:01, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Pee Review and VFH are very different. VFH is where they go after reaching "near perfect" status. Pee Review is for articles that need help, and would not be worthy of VFH (think ICU victims, short articles, boring articles, articles with niche humor, etc etc etc). As Pee Review is currently a desolate empty hell-scape, feel free to just ping people and forceask them to help you out with an impromptu review or just for assistance. This article is totally ok, just not original/unique/special enough to stand out from its predecessors. VFH is not a replacement for Pee Review, they are literal polar opposites MKyap!Fðllðw Ðåmågê †råïl 17:14, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment. that would, in fact, make sense. also, this article is really just a shitpost.deemox 19:10, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
well, an enjoyable shitpost then! :3 brings back memories of a better time... MKyap!Fðllðw Ðåmågê †råïl 20:09, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Haven't read the book and not going to just so I can understand the article. The humour should be obvious for a general reader in my opinoin. Also, an article with just one word or letter has been done many times, so if you do it, it's a good idea to make it special/exceptional. This could be a great article if a little more though went into how to make it exceptional, and how to make the joke clear to people who don't feel like researching why it is funny. ShabiDOO 13:00, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
For the record, I appreciate the genius of Sir DougDoug Scott Wreden’s masterpiece, but this is not a featured article way to honor it. I am working on an article about a similar masterpiece. MrXblow me 16:07, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
AtomicAnon (talk) 18:32, 26 February 2026 (UTC)AtomicAnon
For Votes: 3.5
Half for. its a little too lopsided on the fact vs humor scale, (the first paragraph is kinda just boring facts), but it gets the job done. MKyap!Fðllðw Ðåmågê †råïl 11:25, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
FUCK THE BRITS! 
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump • 06:31, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
For. People keep saying Jimmy's a bad guy, I think it's up to interpretation! I think he did the best he could, given the circumstances... 
Half against. unsure how to say this, but the plot and story sections are almost word for word how it actually plays out, and that makes up 95% of the entire article. A little TOO accurate, kinda like the bill clinton nom 
Abstain. Fuck Mouthwashing, but I can't in good faith vote against this when I was behind the Bill Clinton nom. 
Garlic Bread. Hell yeah! 
Garlic Bread. 
Comment. To clarify, the edits by the MUGA team were almost exclusively technical ones to get the UnGame running again (along with fighting a glitch which kept deleting text from the text area). 
Orchids. Hell yeah 
Doug. Doug Doug Doug Doug Doug Doug; Doug, Doug Doug, Doug, Doug Doug Doug Doug Doug Doug Doug Doug Doug. 
Doug. Doug Doug Doug Doug Doug Doug Doug Doug, Doug 
