From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion. |
Canberra
Keep |
|
Delete |
- This is one of the worst articles I've seen in a while. Filled with emos, highschools and other towncruft. Burn down and let one of our resident Ausies start over. ~ 07:57, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Canberra is mediocre, but nowhere as bad as this article. -- Mitch 08:01, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry I was going to do a rewrite but school intervened. The thing is still shite and a magnet for shite also. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:42, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- UN:N. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:47, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, of course. You see this every couple of days in RC. And it's inevitably an edit to the high schools section. And it's inevitably by an IP. And it's inevitably unfunny. And inevitably, any article, such as this, that has a list of high schools is inherently unfunny. And inevitably, the contents probably contradict UN:VAIN in some form. And inevitably, because of this, it'll get deleted. And inevitably... —–Sir Heerenveen, KUN UotM RotM VFH (talk), 19/09 19:55
- Kerkill It's been here before, no? A rewrite was what had been decided, yes? I'm too busy to check. Either way, I've seen this shit before, and it's only gotten worse. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Sarsage
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- The nominator refused to use {{vfd}} because he doesn't let the system tell him what to do, man. Way to be a conformist there. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 18:41, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
- The nominator will have the system watching him closely in the near future. ~ 07:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Herman Ri
Keep |
|
Delete |
- "The person that wrote this is obviously a 14 year old who watches a couple of G3 videos and then hears Dragonforce, not actually understanding anything to do with guitar, not understanding that Ri records all his solos in about 100 parts and cannot play them live and has no creativity in songwriting ". Although this quote speaks the truth, the article is basically this, and a bunch of praising. What's the term for that? Music-cruft? Whatever, it sucks. Also, o lol Herman "Ri". Whatta riot. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:46, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
- haircut er, I mean delete. --monika 21:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
- Kerkill Dragonforce sucks. And that guy needs a haircut. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:03, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
- Exterminate. —Hinoa talk.kun 23:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Ah, Dragonforce. The first time I listened to them, I was impressed. The second time, I was bored. The third time, I shot myself in the foot and nearly bled to death. So that's the end of that. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 23:56, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
- delete. i can get 68% through the dragonforce song in guitar hero 3 on expert. then comes herman's solo. fuck this guy. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 02:29, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Other titles related to Dragonforce (at least "Dragonforce" itself) are salted, so I recommend salting this too. --Pentium5dot1|t~^_^~c 00:53, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
|
VNV Nation
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Another article from the realm of people making stupid shit up and calling it an article. JediBob Things I've said Things I've done 22:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Well, it's bandcruft... MrN 23:12, Sep 16
- Delete. It's band-worshipping cruft. Ugh. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 23:31, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. - The flactulant four strike again... — Sir Sycamore (talk) 11:51, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. If I had a nickel for each time every time a fanboi said his band is God, I would have...some nickels. I don't know how many. Probably not enough to buy a Lexus. Anyway, the article is sheep's dag. ----OEJ 11:52, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
- Zzzzzz. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 12:01, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
- I was really hoping this would be a fictional country, along the lines of the MCR romance thing article. Then even if it were a crappy article, it wouldn't be a crappy band article. --monika 12:27, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Passion Of The Christ: The Lord Strikes Back
Keep |
- Weakish keep: Hm. Somehow, the title redeems it a little bit for me. I think this could actually be mildly amusing at some point, with a tag, naturally. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:03, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. - There's a few of these, written around 2006 when the film was releases, despite the length, this is just a stone that gathers moss, crap moss at that — Sir Sycamore (talk) 10:36, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. - • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:08, Sep 15
- delete. the anachronisms, they burn! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:30, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- No. Just no. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Jedibob5 (talk • contribs)
- Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:12, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
- Kerkill Crappy and I don't think a rewrite would ever be done. At least not a rewrite that'd incorporate what's currently in it... --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:28, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Mewtwentysix
Keep |
- Keep I think the concept is redeemable. Not to say that I would do it personally... --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 23:21, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- {{idea}}, perhaps? I don't know what it was about it, but for some reason it seems keepworthy, just in need of a little <3. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 18:11 Sep 13, 2008
Keep Well, it was created on 20:53, 22 July 2008. Let it live for a bit longer. Maybe the author will return. Not sure it's worthy of an {{idea}}, the author is probably the only person going to edit it. MrN 19:36, Sep 14 changed vote .. MrN 23:23, Sep 15
|
Delete |
- Delete. Some sort of jumbled Pokemon related mess. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:21, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. "I use that term looser than diorhettic faeces" -- BAD! The article is riddled with misspellings and convoluted syntax. ----OEJ
- delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:31, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 12:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- Kerkill There's no chance of improvement. Per OEJ. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:48, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete I'm changing my mind on this one. The Count did make a compelling argument with his "Some sort of jumbled Pokemon related mess." position... MrN 23:23, Sep 15
- Blast JediBob Things I've said Things I've done 22:58, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
MetaFilter
Sexual Physics
Ebglish
The Greatest Russian Film Ever Made
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - poor topic, lack of empathy for Russian cinema, poor handling throughout, unfunny etc. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 12:59, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:04, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:31, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete and then watch the evening news. It's important to keep up with world affairs. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:38, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- Epic-est fail I have seen in a long time When the characters list has obscure "jokes" that the author has to explain to you in parenthesis, it's bad. JediBob Things I've said Things I've done 22:58, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Isn't it standard procedure to redirect this to the relevant section of the Uncyclopedia Timeline? --Pentium5dot1|t~^_^~c 18:16, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- Deleted. Also, HAY GUYS, IT'S LIKE A WIKI, AND STUFF, AND YOU CAN LIKE, TOTALLY MAKE A REDIRECT PAGE YOURSELF, BECAUSE LIKE, ANYONE CAN LIKE, EDIT AND STUFF, AND ANYONE CAN CREATE LIKE, REDIRECTS. ALSO LOOK, I CAN TALK IN BIG ANNOYING TEXT TOO! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 22:11 Sep 16, 2008
|
The whitlams
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - Stub stared early 2006, no editing in a year, incoherent and unfunny, Its not really something that can be re-written as none of the content or idea lends itslef to anyone but a comepltely new writer starting from scratch. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 20:28, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN 23:24, Sep 15
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:04, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- roflwaffles. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:31, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Looney Tunes: Back in Action
Neutral milk hotel
American Lie
The Davidz
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Invalid Nom Should've put this in QVFD instead, it was just created. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 00:57, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Also, I just did a complete rewrite. Well, at least it isn't just some idiotic racist rambling against Obama now... --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Unvalid nomination. Too young. Also Dexter, what have you got against "some idiotic racist rambling against Obama"? That's my whole shtick! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:29, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- as below - It can be improved. Not worth deleting. -- 20:03, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- weak keep. reverted to a workable version. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:45, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Good enough, and not going to stop anyone else improving it as the concept is general enough. MrN 21:15, Sep 12
- Keep Barely though. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:27, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. - Very old, very poor crap, liilte if any progress, reminds me of Wikipedia — Sir Sycamore (talk) 13:52, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept, voting closed. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:53, Sep 14
|
Runshaw College
Keep |
|
Delete |
- delete. pants. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:03, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- delete. Hmm. Not sure what Sycamore was doing with that ICU there. This is probably new enough for ICU|notfunny still, but hea... MrN 21:22, Sep 12
- delete. Creator of article needs to read UN:HTBFANJS Rfts 03:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. - It is pretty terrible — Sir Sycamore (talk) 12:39, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 15:50, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Pointless. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 17:46, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Be realistic: kill it now. Poorly written, random, pointless. "I hat my skool becuz I is illiterate, boo hoo." ----OEJ 17:53, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- it was actually a {{deadend}} that syc put on there, but i guess this is still below a week old technically, so maybe the nom is invalid. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 22:04, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Comment - Seeing as I'm a sucker for tedious jobs it might be an idea to extend the ICU to two days, I'll be able to knock down any that get missed the next day on uncatergoized pages? — Sir Sycamore (talk) 12:39, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
|
101
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Seems pointless. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 20:33, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete: The HTTP status code 101 means "Switching Protocols," and this is used very rarely, so it doesn't really make sense for this article to be one-fourth of a 404 error. After deletion, this should be redirected to 1, which is part of Uncyclopedia's timeline system, based on the convention that unqualified numbers are assumed to be years. --Pentium5dot1|t~^_^~c 22:56, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 17:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. As per Pentium5.1, the article is not about the 101 error; thus it's minimal content makes no sense. ----OEJ 17:51, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- well, i'd vote delete if this error didn't exist, but i'd vote keep if it did (it's similar to 404, which is clever enough). not knowing means i'll wait until someone de-uninforms me. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:41, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Golden Mean
Keep |
|
Delete |
- delete. pointless mathcruft. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:23, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 20:35, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete or otherwise needs major work Rfts 03:43, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 17:44, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. The phrase "Since the fallen of Da Vinci, the truth of the value is in debate" is really rotten though not a Worst Prose of the Century prizewinner. It's a bad, short, picless article. ----OEJ 17:56, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- very weak keep - It's a big topic, and a good place to start for a great re-write — Sir Sycamore (talk) 09:24, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep for slightly better version and so Simsilikesims can do with it what she wishes. --monika 13:10, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Needs a rewrite obviously, but some of what is here might prove useful for that. MrN 21:17, Sep 12
- Dorky as hell but this is a little bit vital. Death is kind of a big topic and I know I've linked to it more than once. Rewrite, revert, something of the sort. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 17:43, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Someone ::nose to finger:: should go through and pick out a better version from the history. There are better versions in the history. I've seen them, for real, like, a long time ago. --monika 03:33, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- I started working on this before Dark Prince got his hands on it, he asked me not to edit it till he had rewritten it so I didn't. Mistake? -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 05:48, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- It wasn't the wrong thing to do, but I think at this point you get free rein if you want to do it now. --monika 12:56, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
I reverted it to a version from the end of August 2008. Still kind of dorky, though. See what you think and revise your votes accordingly. ----OEJ
- OEJ: Cheers dude. Don't forget to re-add the VFD tag if ya revert an article when it's on VFD, or the vote may be considered invalid by the closing admin. Dr Skullthumper: dude. MrN 17:50, Sep 13
- Oops. I did indeed forget about that. My apologies. I note that the version I reverted to was by Simsilikesims, so he should feel free to continue work, free, free at last. ----OEJ 17:59, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Text Pages
Youth
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - Original author abadoned this a few years ago, no real progress, and it seems to be a poor concept to work from. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 13:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Well, either redirect or delete it. Personally, I think redirect is probably the way to go on this one. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:04, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:35, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- Kerkill Then turn it into a disambiguation page per Pentium. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:11, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. I vote against a redirect -- "Youth" is a decent subject on its own, there's much to be said for it, so leave the possibility open so someone could create it easily if they wanted to.----OEJ
|
Comments |
- And Seven ages of man perhaps. ----OEJ 13:15, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
|
How i met your mother
Keep |
- Keep I reverted to a better version. This is going to exist. It does need a rewrite, though. Maybe something like the life and times of a 1976 JFK half-dollar... --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:08, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. I think this could be fixed with a rewrite instead of taking it out completely. --Orange Geuce Yum! 21:18, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. For one main reason: Fuck it. This is going to exist, and it's not going to be very funny. Leave it until someone comes around, gets italic, and rewrites it to be decent. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:01, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- weak keep - The topic is fairly major, despite the articles crapness and the topics shiteness — Sir Sycamore (talk) 19:36, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Delete |
18:32, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Gulf War
Google Street View
Keep |
- Keep What can we do with Google Street View? We can look at other people's houses, and the people too, all with the click of a mouse. Me-yo 23:21, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- delete. ICU escapee. poorly executed. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:08, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- delete. I was leaning toward a tag, but I mean, what can you really do with Google Street View? You can look at streets. You can't invade anyone's privacy, because you can't see anybody. It's streets. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:08, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Kerkill --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:27, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 13:55, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- delete maybe a rewrite Extremelyestlybored 23:42, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- Yawn. The Patriot Act is a violation of privacy. Google Street View is not. Even if Google became the government, which wouldn't entirely surprise me given the rate at which they've been growing, it still wouldn't be a violation of privacy. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 01:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:34, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment: You can definitely see some people. Actually, there's a semi-famous shot of a shady-looking guy climbing over a fence - the Google Street View Car may have caught a burglary in progress. My favorite shot, however, is when the Google Street View Car went through a McDonald's and kept recording that they were driving down a street that they were not. You head down this road.. a little further... and suddenly you're in the drive-through, ordering six cheeseburgers, a cheeseburger with no pickles, a cheeseburger with nothing but pickles, two small cokes, five large cokes, a medium coke, two medium cokes, five large Sprites, two small Sprites, a large Sprite, a diet Dr. Pepper, and eight Chicken McNuggets. pillow talk 21:30, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- An article written more like that could survive, granted. An article about how evil and spy-y it is can't, particularly when it makes up a whole ton of things that Street View can't... actually do. At all. Not even close. It's just not funny. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 23:28, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 17:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Rewrite tag. I think it's something we need an article on, and while this isn't brilliant, Syc is right, there are worse in category:rewrite, and it may serve as a useful starting point for someone. --UU - natter 11:55, Sep 5
- I agree or alternately, it could be combined with our non-existent caste article. --monika 06:00, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. ~ 13:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Damn it I hate when good stuff gets on this page. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:48, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- delete. extremely short and random. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:41, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- Weak delete - I feel like it could be salvageable if it gave us some frame of reference. I'm vaguely aware of Brahmins, but still unable to understand what the article is on about. pillow talk 22:22, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- Kerkill Needs to go. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:11, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- delete. Looks like some kind of un-funny rant to me. I'm not sure it's a good basis for a better article. MrN 01:25, Sep 7
- D1337 Imageless and unfunny. Chocolate Rain 01:36, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I found a longer version in the history, but I'm not sure about keeping it still... MrN 16:59, Sep 4
- yea i went through the history a bit too, i really didn't find anything worthy of surviving deletion. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:01, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- I personally think we should keep this if possible - I think a re-write would be better than losing the topic altogether. (Category:Rewrite has much more crap articles kept?) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 10:26, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Well, if you volunteer to rewrite it, I will gladly and immediately strike my delete vote... pillow talk 16:07, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep! You got no sole. It might be a little bit flat footed, but is not VFD. Here, have some pimms. MrN 14:47, Sep 8
- Keep. Not VFD quality, but could do with a do-up. Oh, and Gerrycheevers, allow me to introduce you to the move button. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 15:03, 08 Sep 2008
- Keep. Again. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- Keep And Spang, there is no move button!!! Ix-nay on the move uttbon, kay? --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:00, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Move it, shove a tag on it. The idea is brimming with potential, it's just that the execution disappoints it. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:05, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- very weak keep - As per the others, no concensus, no delete — Sir Sycamore (talk) 13:56, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. for the article title alone. It does need to be rewritten. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- delete. first of all, it should be 'movie of lady whose ankle is showing'. this article is irredeemably bad. not linked from anywhere. too many memes. Tingle the Magical Flying Aardvark of Justice. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:42, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
* Delete. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 14:44, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Seriously. Rip off the concept of the "actresses in corsets" FA and then randomly type for several pages? Fail. pillow talk 18:07, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:56, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Possibly a good idea somewhere in the title, I can't find the redeeming value anywhere. I also can't find the previous nom, Mhaille, if you're voting to keep it again. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 20:03, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I think there could be some debate as it's not really a stub - although it's a piece of shit, I'm gonna reserve my vote for now. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 14:50, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- So you're witholding your vote, not because it's a piece of shit, but because it's a long piece of shit? A piece of shit is a piece of shit, my friend, length should be completely unimportant. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:58, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hyperbole Got a link? I can't find it! MrN 18:12, Sep 8
- Here's the Pee Review to consider. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 20:03, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Feces/These might give you the shits
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - Pointless and unfunny subpage — Sir Sycamore (talk) 20:05, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. The list is brimming with postmodernist insight (if indeed anything postmodernist can be called insightful) but I feel that the point the author is trying to develop is one that everyone must discover on their own, and that having an article like this can only be destructive in the long run. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 20:16, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Weak keep: "If you believe in the spleen then please add something here. Testicles. Thank-you." That's not funny. It shouldn't be funny. Why is that funny? --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:10, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. I've got to go with Monkey on this one. This author was apparently very drunk when he typed this. And here at Uncyclopedia, we do not have a policy of deleting the shitty works of drunks. pillow talk 21:27, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Made me laugh. Uncontrollably. It shouldn't be funny. A Taco Bell Bathroom! --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. I added it to the "Written by Cretins" category. With a little work this could be even more cheerfully idiotic and a bit funnier. ----OEJ 01:16, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 13:58, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. And let's dispense with the compliments shall we? ~ 13:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. You mean I can't tell everyone how fantastic a lover you are Mordillo? OK, I won't. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:45, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Comment from Author: Hmmm, yes, well, ah this article is at the stage where it is just a template for an article, i sat down and wrote lots of bullshit with the intention of refining it(sorry, i meant refunnying it). Sadly, mock exams hit and i was too bogged down with the time consuming work of putting off studying, this is taking up too much of my spare time and this article has been bumped down to priority 14. It should still be a construction but i wanted to encourage others to add to it since i didn't have the time.This is my first article and i do apreciate your feedback.
- You could move it to your userspace until you're done. --monika 23:43, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- I could, but then other users would not want to add to it in the meantime. Befg-mike 06:44, 10 September 2008 (HTG)
|
Dropkick Murphy
Def Star
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - A seminal work by a 2006 User, I really like the way he contrasts Mos Def with Star Wars — Sir Sycamore (talk) 17:20, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Kerkill I hate Kanye. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:22, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:43, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 15:08, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:04, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. As Sycamore slyly notes, there is no reference to Mos Def in the article. And "seminal" is, perhaps, a bit of hyperbole. But the article is bad. Picless. Short. Random. ----OEJ 00:52, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I'm divided. I'd like to slap an {{idea}} tag on it because it's cute, but I get the feeling that wouldn't help it. --monika 19:11, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Uncyclopedia:Ideas gives you an indication of how much of success the ideas template... MrN 19:14, Sep 7
- Yeah, that's about what I expect out of that template. But on the other hand, my first featured article was a rewrite of a terrible article where the only good part was the name and then I changed the name, but I wouldn't have come up with the idea otherwise. Crap articles with amusing titles may have very very little probability of improving, but that probability is non-zero. That's not to say that every one is worth saving. (Perhaps the Ideas category itself needs the {{idea}} template.) --monika 01:11, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- I actually do go look through the Idea template sometimes. It's not a total waste, actually, it's probably handy to have as a more descriptive form of rewrite. If someone sees something where they like the concept, and think they can do a lot with it, it's more likely to be good than someone just writing on a mere title basis. Unless the concept is terrible, in which case, that's what deletion's for. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:04, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Whale Blowhole Power Plant
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - More IP trash fomr 2006, poor concept, pooer excution, bad writng, stubbish, just awful crap — Sir Sycamore (talk) 17:16, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Kerkill This blows. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:19, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:44, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 15:07, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN 18:14, Sep 8
- Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:02, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Took one look at it and knew it should be deleted.--Orange Geuce Yum! 21:11, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Katana Shogun Warriors
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - Very crap, stub, content is pretty unknown, search engines come up with this, appears to be vanity, listy as well — Sir Sycamore (talk) 15:43, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Kerkill And it was edited by Mordillo a lot, too! That's a valid reason, right?!? --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 15:55, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Lists. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 17:49, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:45, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 15:07, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Home Alone With MJ
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - Old IP film cruft, pointless and not funny for sober people — Sir Sycamore (talk) 15:37, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Kerkill Hillary is not pleased. Also, Hillary better accept my damn friend invite on YouTube! Obama and Kucinich did! --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 15:49, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. An entire article based on a viral image. Eugh. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 17:49, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- delete. i'd love to meet michael jordan! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:46, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 15:06, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
This Old House
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - Poor 2006 film article, author long abandoned the site, along iwht this listy poitless shite article, unfunny, poor writing — Sir Sycamore (talk) 15:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Kerkill Ha! None of the movies have anything to do with each other! It's funny, yeah?!? ... Wait, this is stupid... Ah dammit! --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 15:41, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Blarg honk. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 17:48, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- john ratzenberger. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:46, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
"Manos" The Hands of Fate
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- It's sunday, and I have dyslexia, I stand by my speellling:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 15:34, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Crash
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- What about repurposing the article to be about computer crashes? Perhaps a redirect to Blue Screen of Death is in order? I would suggest a disambig, but I can't think of any other good articles on computer crashes. --Pentium5dot1|t~^_^~c 04:45, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Lord of the Things
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. - 2007 film crap - badly written, poor concept, little if any real progress, from the history it looks like the author dodged an ICU — Sir Sycamore (talk) 12:15, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Arse attack 7 film
University of Texas at Austin
West Hollywood