From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion. |
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Say Bye-bye-uh I created it, and now I want it gone. Now that this season of American Idol is over, nobody cares about Sanjaya Malakar anymore, and it appears he doesn't have many fans here, unless his singing career picks up in the coming months. Kip the Dip 20:03, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Author request. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 22:37, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Only too happy to oblige. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:52, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- QVFD your own stuff, for future reference. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:15, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- I hated Sanjaya anyway. --General Insineratehymn 03:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- who cares? kill --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:59, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Who the fuck is that? Roman Dog Bird 16:02, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete WTF? --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 18:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete: Not funny, not close enough to actual Zerglings, not worth keeping. --Sir gwax (talk) 19:09, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Just not funny. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Maybe just search for "Pwned" and delete all the articles that come up? Rogpyvbc 04:50, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Zerg Rush-Retrofuture42 09:25, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- De-1337 --EMC [TALK] 22:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Looking at this article makes me want to vomit up a storm. --General Insineratehymn 06:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Adding a 16th page here should be excused when it is this crap. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Couldn't make it through the first paragraph --Quall 10:26, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- AGH MY EYES - Some Random Pigeon (Bird Feed) (Bird Droppings). 10:52, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- L 15:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Bad gay jokes and the Mordor mad-lib. Blarch --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 17:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- This article is shit. It also sucks arse. It's very gay. Did I not mention that it's shit? --» >UF|TLK|▋» 17:29, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep Passable parody of past painful punishments. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 04:32, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep A bit of work needed , but a good idea. Rogpyvbc 04:57, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Originally to cross the Wikipedia horrors of Autofellatio, Ashlee Simpson and Crushing By Elephant. That "2005cruft" comment makes me cry and cry and cry just 'cos it's probably true. Plz to userfy if killed kthx. - David Gerard 08:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- The best I can do is abstain... sorry David. It's a bit rambly and confusing - perhaps it needs more sporkiness? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- used on pages, has redeeming value, and your reason for nomming it is rubbish --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:21, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Smackup -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:45, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Use value outweighs nudity. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 04:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep: It's use on Girls Gone Wilde is appropriate but I agree with Insineratehymn that there should be no gratuitous nudity on Uncyclopedia. Nudity should only be used when the nudity itself is central to the humor. Tacking on nudity to an otherwise good article simply detracts by narrowing the audience to those unopposed to nudity. --Sir gwax (talk) 19:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep What's so bad about nudity? Why, I'd put up nude photos of myself, except that it would narrow the audience to -- well -- me. On a good day. Rogpyvbc 05:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep The comments above are pretty much what I think. Tode 09:41, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- There shall be no gratuitous nudity here on Uncyclopedia. --General Insineratehymn 01:51, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Not keep yet, but this is nothing that we couldn't see over and over at NSFW category. The huge white border is very lame thus. -- herr doktor needsAbolt [scream!] 02:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep I was going to say weak keep anyway (think how much worse stuff is likely to appear under this title...) but then I found a bit of old okay-ness in the history to add in. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:55, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
Stunningly ugly formatting, and bad writing too. Wickedpedia has an article on Indiana Tech, if that makes any difference. ----OEJ 22:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted: Random, slandanity, completely lacking in quality, etc. --Sir gwax (talk) 18:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep I'm as naggy about templates as anyone, but I think these things have their place on a carefully controlled number of pages. In this case, the template has taken on a new irony in these days of template-hating. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep It doesn't invite template abuse - it makes for nice irony on pages with lots of templates already - although where the templates make it funny rather than where someone got carried away. - Some Random Pigeon (Bird Feed) (Bird Droppings). 10:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong strong strong keep. Leagues better than the other one mentioned below. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Why not? It's along the same lines as the no images template (which I can't find) and also makes any page automatically ironic. If used sparingly, could be good.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Re: Ljlego: templates suck. They were considered funny someday in a very distant past, along with Oscar quotes, Mr. T. and Chuck Norris facts. Now the best thing to do is avoid them whenever possible, or adding just one when absolute necessary and abusing the reader's patience a little. -- herr doktor needsAbolt [scream!] 23:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- I think Ljlego knows. By the way, anonymous delete voter above, I like that other template less than this one. It makes no sense, but in a bad way. So if you want to get rid of one, I'd choose that one. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted: largely for the reasons that HerrDoktor states and, more specifically, templates never add humor to an article, they only ever serve to tie related articles together or annoyingly take up space. This template lived longer than it should have and its time has come to an end. --Sir gwax (talk) 18:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Sigh. Redirected to the other one, since its absence ironically left a mess of redlinks that I'm really not going to clean up. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:10, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Hesitant Keep. Tag with re-write? I mean, it's no worse than an awful number of articles around here. Rogpyvbc 06:22, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I know we hate school articles, but if you ignore the prejudice this is actually quite good in places. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Rogpyvbc: that other articles suck is no good reason to keep one that sucks a little less; you should put the other sucky articles up for VFD.
Strange but untrue: it's not that we hate school articles, it's that we hate random, crappy, retarded articles. --Sir gwax (talk) 17:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- It's not great, but it's not crap. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep "This led to a lot of painfully un-cool people walking around looking like hairy easter eggs, because they simply weren't awesome enough to handle the wardrobe." -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 07:09, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- 2005-cruft. That's how they say it around these parts, right? -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:48, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Here, the physical-abstract swap joke is lame. Short. Huff --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 22:53, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:55, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 04:03, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Rogpyvbc 07:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Short, bad. ----OEJ 22:24, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Shove into abyss of sadness and despair Never to return.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete as vanity. See Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Paul_Sahbaz. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 22:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Yeah, probably. Also starcruft. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:58, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Ooo, neat new vanity template! Or maybe I'm just really behind the times. --Andorin Kato 00:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 03:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Blocky, picless, incoherent. ----OEJ 22:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Nope-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:50, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep What the fuck, he's the 12th President for god fucking sakes. It's also fucking funny to, sir--Cookies,yum! 20:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- /me sniper-ifies all of you for trying to delete a president. --CIA agent 00:03, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- All the U.S. presidents have articles (also some other countries' leaders, too). So shouldn't it be re-written rather than have ol' Zach be the only one left off? Rogpyvbc 07:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- It's uncyclopedia not Wikipedia, what does it matter if there's one president missing. He can be reborn again later, funnier and dirtier. The Oblong Lobster 21:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Blarch Some nonsense about Microsoft and Linux. No point merging it. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 02:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Well, that just beat my inner child senseless. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Kill. This without considering the failed self-quote at the beginning. -- herr doktor needsAbolt [scream!] 04:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete---Retrofuture42 17:41, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- o___o. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I once held this show dear. I still do, but this article has to go.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:41, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'm gonna have to go with smite. --Andorin Kato 22:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Tux? What's he doing here? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:08, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 03:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Incoherent. ----OEJ 22:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect to Spongebob Squarepants. --General Insineratehymn 22:50, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Someone has redirected it, which is fair enough. Generally best not to do that until an admin has closed the voting though, mysterious someone. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
From the talk page:
- Woop!::Everyone is gonna love this one, huh term?::An adult teen?::I didn´t know that adult teens even exist at all.::Wow!::i cant believe that such a good article was created when edited so much by people who don't have accounts. teh wiki way is working! --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 18:23, 22 January 2007 (UTC)::Reply to "Wow!"::Well, I can´t believe it either. Alot newbs adding theirselves to "infamous players" who no one knows and claim they should be... I think this article should be cleaned and locked in order to prevent the sabotage.
It appears not everyone agrees with these comments... ----OEJ 22:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Weak keep A very occasional chuckle. Probably just because it's slightly better than most of the school articles we've deleted. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:34, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- This is quite possibly the worst article I have ever seen on the site. It deserves only DEATH!!! --General Insineratehymn 23:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hang it. Let's open room for a better idea. -- herr doktor needsAbolt [scream!] 23:28, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Bad-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Article busted. Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines
- Delete from existence. Though I liked the part about Sartre's photography influencing the way we see the world. Rogpyvbc 06:26, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Beautiful A delicate and moving piece. The Oblong Lobster 19:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:47, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- I've seen worse, Insineratehymn... but... DAMN. --Andorin Kato 22:34, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 03:28, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
DELETED. Voting Closed. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 21:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Break this window --General Insineratehymn 23:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Kill this heresy. How dare the author compare Led Zeppelin to Green Day. Disgusting. Led Zeppelin pwns Green Day. Ugh.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:56, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Absolutely. Destroy simply for mentioning Led Zeppelin and Green Day in the same sentence. Oh wait, so did I... Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Rogpyvbc 06:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete--Asahatter (annoy) 07:02, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Fucking kill it Roman Dog Bird 19:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 03:27, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
DELETED. Voting Closed. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 21:31, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep and rewrite. This one deserves a little bitty chance. --Andorin Kato 04:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- I dont see why tou guys are complaning this is verry funny --Chuck Smith 22:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete - Either needs to be deleted or made more funny and more encyclopedic. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:13, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 14:40, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Short dicdefs, inappropriate for Undictionary. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:02, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Flush. For added offense, the author of this piece of naïf calumny placed it twice on VFP. -- herr doktor needsAbolt [scream!] 19:48, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Scrap. For added offense, he's also a sockpuppet -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Huff. Not that I don't have anything against the sock but... –—Hv (talk) 22/05 19:54
- yoinked from a british tv show, so let's give it a kill or two --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete: Yeah. That's... lame. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 23:00, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Not only plagarised, but not that funny in itself.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Self-explanatory. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 02:50, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:58, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Heh heh. Nintendorgasm. --Andorin Kato 05:58, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Rogpyvbc 06:31, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Asahatter (annoy) 08:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Short, uninteresting. ----OEJ 14:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I know many gay boys. They are not games consoles. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:21, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Electrocute, just to add variety. --General Insineratehymn 23:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Blarch Stubby, centres around a bad pun. We already have Kidney. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:16, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete.----OEJ 23:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to Kidney. --Andorin Kato 05:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete The article "Kidney" is enough. No one really needs two kidneys.Rogpyvbc 06:28, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Personally I'd prefer 2 kidneys, but will sell these --Asahatter (annoy) 08:47, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This is a one-joke town. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:18, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Gone --Sir gwax (talk) 20:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Random stub 2005cruft. Horrible. Huff. –—Hv (talk) 21/05 21:07
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Short, uninteresting. ----OEJ 23:28, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Rogpyvbc 06:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Bye --Asahatter (annoy) 08:48, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete---Retrofuture42 16:56, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Gone --Sir gwax (talk) 20:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Gone --Sir gwax (talk) 20:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Is just too random and is stupid instead of funny. --Chuck Smith 22:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)--
- Delete Has the usual stupid references, illogical development. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 20:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Jesus h8s this article. Smite. --Andorin Kato 22:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. A good example of the unreadable evils of random memecruft.----OEJ 23:32, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Peck out its eyes --Asahatter (annoy) 08:50, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Drops more names than a spill in a nametag factory. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:33, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Gone --Sir gwax (talk) 20:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Blarch Low-quality doppleganger of Atlantis. "Borrows" from Futurama's undersea episode. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 05:38, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:39, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Rogpyvbc 05:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- yep, this is forkcruft --» >UF|TLK|▋» 17:29, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Gone --Sir gwax (talk) 20:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Vanity. Dumb. Unfunny. --Andorin Kato 22:32, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as vanity. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree: smells like teen vanity. ----OEJ 23:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- 'BITCH'. Also, I thought I already put this on QVFD-- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:11, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Moved to userspace, hopefully not coming back Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Blarch L. I. S. T. Space. C. R. U. F. T. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 04:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Axe. Looks like a bad attempt at random humor... --Andorin Kato 05:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- ete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- delete Rogpyvbc 05:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 09:46, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Makes itself out to be terribly well loved when actually it's just vanity based on things some guy has said. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete - AAARGH MY EYES! Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Are you kidding me? Pwn! --Andorin Kato 04:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Petty trash-talk about a wrestler, studded with truly awful pictures. Axe --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 04:33, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- my comment --» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Rogpyvbc 06:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 09:20, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - truly truly awful. Should probably be shown to all n00bs as an example of what not to write, but I haven't the courage to let it live. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Rewrite: I think the article's got potential if expanded a bit (i.e. go more into detail about making Frohman the real star of Half-Life 2), but given the current VFD response, I get the feeling it'll fall under nobody cares rules. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 19:22, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Plan Z Having read the whole webcomic, I have to say that this is pretty accurate. I also love the God tag. BUT, it's short and kinda lacking in substance- rewriting could make this better. --Sir Erwin Rommel 22:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Fork-cruft --General Insineratehymn 17:39, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- I don't get it. It's like, almost got potential, then I realize that I don't get it, and it doesn't. Go away!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:11, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Smackdown please. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:13, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- A bad parody of the "real" guy, who's a good parody. I, myself, am a lemon-filled parody. With sprinkles. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment: Gordon Frohman was the lead character of the webcomic Concerned. He was written as a sort of anti-Gordon Freeman, in that he's a friendly bonehead who somehow goes down the same path Freeman does in Half-Life 2. All in all, a lot better than most sprite comics out there (the author actually knew how to end it and not drag it out with a billion Matrix quotes! Wow!), but the tone of voting seems to imply nobody's read this. Ah, well. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 19:22, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Middle I'm one of those who haven't read this comic, and would vote to delete. However, if you want to rewrite it, I wont vote as such. But I can't vote to keep either, because damn, there isn't anything funny about it currently. --THINKER 00:12, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Gone. -- The Zombiebaron 20:31, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- I forgot to put this up for VFD, but HOLY FUCK THIS PAGE IS SUCH A PUTRID PILE OF DOGSHIT! --General Insineratehymn 15:35, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed. Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines
- Soylent Green is people. Apparently, so are these. Stop the genocide.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:13, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Smackdown please -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:11, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hey, look! I recognize that template. Let's sacrifice them both. --Andorin Kato 06:01, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Blarch List. Cruft. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Fearless: Listcruft supreme. And with a poll in the main article, too. I'd say the list may work as subpages (Phobia/A, Phobia/B, etc), but as it stands, this don't work at all. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 19:09, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- It's a list, and not a good one at that. There's just too much crap that can be created (by countless idiots who think they're funny and aren't) at the behest of this page. Delete -Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:25, 19 May 2007 (UTC) (signed post-vote)
|
Comments |
- How many of these are actually real? --Andorin Kato 06:02, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hello, i started this page. Yes it is a list, but i think it is ripe for development by someone else, something simple like expanding the specific phobia bits. P.S the original phobias that i put in are all real, i don't know about the others P.S Again, what is wrong with a poll? From Byebyespy 18:49, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Kept, voting closed. -- The Zombiebaron 20:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. I hate it, but I think it deserves a vote first. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 13:55, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 14:23, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Uber-long boring tables, bad pictures, rubbish. Bleuch! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:19, 18 May 2007
- Delete before I puke. This article sucks.
- About as dead as the wood after which it is named. --General Insineratehymn 02:25, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete unless someone is actually going to fix it. Now. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete - A few revisions, none good. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:13, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 14:39, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Meh. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- GO AWAY! I rest my case.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:15, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Asahatter (annoy) 05:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and nominate for Worst Run-On Bad Grammar of the Month: "It originated as small plastic piece that would be melted onto the surface of the eye to protect the wearer from the bugs, which would commonly try to burrow in through your cornia, and try to get to your brain to lay eggs on the warm frontal lob, which would be commonly be very warm and moist, which the larva would trive in."----OEJ 13:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - Stubcruft. –—Hv (talk) 20/05 15:39
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- My eyes nearly exploded after seeing this atrocity. --General Insineratehymn 17:31, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Takedown. Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines
- Oof.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:12, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- OW. Blitz quickly before the creator comes back and decides to make another. --Sir Erwin Rommel 22:15, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Smackdown please -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:13, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, my. You know what. --Andorin Kato 06:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I get the feeling they know something I don't. But I don't want to, neither. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:21, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- ec, breezy, beautiful NUKE --» >UF|TLK|▋» 19:32, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Whilst Weird Al might well be funny, that does not necessarily make the article equally so. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 16:01, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- As it appears to be verbatim Weird Al lyrics, shouldn't it just be huffed post haste? Plagiarism bad! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- I think it's a deliberate parody - I do quite like the whole sections thing, but it doesn't quite work. Not my favourite Al song, either! -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:25, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Coincidental delete, as I happen to be listening to Hardware Store right now. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:14, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. They could've at least done better on the formatting, if they were going to copy-paste like this. --Andorin Kato 19:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- plagiarism != funny --» >UF|TLK|▋» 19:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Boo!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:29, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Now young article, you will die. Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines
- Delete as plagiarism. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 20:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Oh, GOD. Spare me! --Andorin Kato 06:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- No potential. Delete --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:11, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:11, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Frick it -- di Mario 10:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- ICU it hard, and someone should make sure it really improves or the Grim Weeper should slice its database entry off with a breadknife. ----OEJ 13:39, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- I would, but I'm not sure how you ICU something harder than normal...! -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:13, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete short, weird imaginary stuff. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 05:23, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Short, full of red links, and I don't get it. Burninate. --Andorin Kato 05:55, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:09, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It reads like a racial slur on the Britsh, and besides, "twee" means "two" in Dutch and everyone knows there can only be one -- di Mario 10:50, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Twee is a funny word, but the article is not a funny article. ----OEJ 13:40, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Huff. –—Hv (talk) 20/05 13:44
- Delete I don't think they quite know what twee means. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- kill --» >UF|TLK|▋» 19:29, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Huff Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- not this again --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:59, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- But we had this for dinner last night Ma! -- The Zombiebaron 21:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- As I said last time "*Surprisingly, keep. It's a parody of bullshit critics bullshit critiques. Y'know, those blowhards that see a lightswitch in a gallery and drone on about the "...play between shadow and light...", and "The switch itself is in the up position, indicating the joy of lightness...". I'd prefer a different title, but keep none the less. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and suggestion to archive this ASAP - This is wasting space here so soon after the last vote. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong-Ass Keep It's not going to get deleted. Give it up --Kip the Dip 19:21, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Alright, I'm sorry, I should've looked in the archives for it, but I think that if something survives deletion then it should have some sort of message on its talk page, that way this doesn't happen again, that way I don't feel like a cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit-bag.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:23, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- We much prefer this method. It give me a chance to --> /me looks at Ljlego with slight grin and one eyebrow raised. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:31, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- No, that would need a slightly smug grin. Obviously. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:52, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, yes of course. Well, you've out-logicked me in this one, Sir "Normal Habits of a Person." Sure glad you're more clever than I am. /slightly smug grin. -Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:04, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe make a list of articles that have survived VFD, that everyone can check before nominating new ones. Rogpyvbc 19:34, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- A new template, maybe? --Andorin Kato 23:52, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff Bad year article that goes off in a fancruft direction. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 19:56, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- No Do you expect me to believe that this is a year? Come on, how can you make up history 20000 years ahead of now? Delete-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:41, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Mein Gott! Blitzkrieg it- short, unfunny, and grates on the nerves VERY quickly. --Sir Erwin Rommel 21:59, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Oy vey --THINKER 23:59, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Smackdown please -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:11, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as per the holy book of HTBFANJS. --Andorin Kato 05:57, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:03, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. No dam' good. ----OEJ 13:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - too gamey. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:22, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Pointless template that is used on only one article. --General Insineratehymn 17:48, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- There already is a "piece of crap" template that is funnier than this. I recommend saving the address to that Batman thing, though. That's kinda funny.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:07, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Boo pointless, redundant templates! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:23, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Adam West deserves better. --THINKER 00:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Smackdown please -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:13, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:40, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- kill, but spare image --» >UF|TLK|▋» 19:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)~
|
Comments |
The Jiggling Batman is Image:Ualuealualeualueale.gif and is linked on a noomber of ardickles, includulating the seminal Bat Fuck Insane. Enjoy it in its batspastic goodness -- I certainly do. ----OEJ 02:03, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- It's no batusi. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:49, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
|