From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Score: +5
|
Good |
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
lol@randomlycheckinguserpage/whatlinkshereandfindingarticleonHyperVFG --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 17:12, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
- good --Mn-z 04:09, September 28, 2009 (UTC)
|
Score: +3
|
Good |
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
- timed out --Mn-z 04:09, September 28, 2009 (UTC)
|
Score: +1
|
Good |
- Good too injokey for the main page, but its one of our funnier articles. --Mn-z 16:42, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
|
Score: +2
|
Good |
|
Not Good |
- Bad taste. To me, this is a straight article with a couple dirty/offensive words thrown in. WHY??? 04:32, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Bad - Another stupid use of that word. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:18, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: +2
|
Good |
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
|
Score: +1
|
Good |
- fwhore for an article about a pregnant male furry, I think this is pretty good. --Mn-z 16:16, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
|
Score: +4
|
Good |
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
|
Score: +4
|
Good |
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
|
Score: +2
|
Good |
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
|
Score: +3
|
Good |
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
|
Score: +4
|
Good |
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
- Fencesitting. I feel like the concept is a little bit murky, somehow. It's not about an apocalypse that didn't happen - it's about an apocalypse that wasn't an apocalypse. That leaves me scratching my head a bit. pillow talk 20:17, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain per Hype. --Mn-z 17:26, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hm, should I clarify that the apocalypse killed some things, but not all? And then it would be "sub-par"? Staircase CUNt 16:32, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
|
Score: +5
|
Good |
- Good I wrote an article that doesn't involve pregnancy (well almost). --Mn-z 17:39, September 7, 2009 (UTC)
- Good I always like pics of pussies. (Seriously, funny). WHY??? 04:18, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Good Ahhh this one's on here. Good one mAttlobster. (hello) 17:19, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
- Good. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:27, 23 November 2009
- Good —Paizuri MUN (Talk • Contribs • Poll!) 02:46, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
- promoted. --Mn-z 03:55, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
|
Score: +5
|
Good |
- Undeletable its a template, and a mentions Oscare Wilde, and pants, and iCarly, and it was seminude lesbians, and its an in-joke, and I once used it to transclude iCarly into RDB's userpage without any negative consequences, and Hyperbole was a contributing writer. --Mn-z 18:27, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
- For. I'ma go up on this. I enjoy BUTT POOP. !!!! pillow talk 18:51, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
- Obvious For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:24, 23 November 2009
- Why not? It's Magically Fucking Delicious!!! 20:44,23November,2009
- !!!! --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 00:09, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
- Flour On this, uncy's 5th anniversary, it's mandatory to give all fours a fifths, and graduate them. Butt Poop, you're doing a good job Brownie. Aleister in Chains 5 January, MMX
|
Not Good |
- Against. I don't get the (presumably inside) joke. (You got someone else to vote). King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 06:48, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
- That's because your not active on VFD. the fake vfd vote might explain it better. --Mn-z 06:53, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
- I don't know what you consider active, but I've voted/commented on VFD about 25 times in the last month. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 07:24, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
- By active, I mean someone who was around when Sycamore was voting keep on everything. --Mn-z 17:04, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- we need to find someone else to vote on this. --Mn-z 05:45, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
- promoted
|
Score: +5
|
Good |
- Good This has failed VFH 3 times now, but it definitely deserves something. Don Puttano cHeDDs 17:28,9October,2009
- Good. I voted against it on VFH because it's an inside joke, but that's no reason for it not to get a VFG nod. pillow talk 18:19, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Feature. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 19:22, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
- Yes per Woody. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:25, 23 November 2009
- lol —Paizuri MUN (Talk • Contribs • Poll!) 02:44, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
- Fading for Putting it over the top, except for the last part, where the gawkers vandalized it. Aleister in Chains 4 Jan. MMX
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
- promoted --Mn-z 16:04, January 14, 2010 (UTC)
|
Score: +5
|
Good |
- Nom & Good. Too short for VFH, and I don't think it would be better longer. But I liked it. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 22:45, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Good Ah, you must have seen my recent change edits. Disagree, I just came across it myself and thought it would make a very good VFH, but I've got another article in mind to nominate there. If it's nommed it has my vote. Men in Black is, wait. . .just a moment, I forgot. Aleister in Chains 22:50 27 Jan. MMX
- Good. When I saw it, I didn't expect much, but some of that text was actually damn funny. pillow talk 00:44, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Jolly Good!--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 01:40, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Good. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:55, 28 January 2010
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
|
Score: +6
|
Good |
- Good. 'Ello folks. Being, as I am, a regular on this page, I'm sure you won't be surprised to see me here. Anyway, I came across this - it's a lonely little page, but I enjoyed reading it. It's not VFH brilliant, but I think it's good, and so I bring it here for others to see. And now I'm off again. Toodles! --UU - natter 13:54, Jan 14
- Good. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:06, 19 January 2010
- Frightening. But good. pillow talk 18:27, January 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Good All too real. Aleister in Chains 25 Jan. MMX
- Better. I think this could be VFH. Would it be violating some policy or other if it got nommed for that? King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 02:08, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Doog. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:54, 28 Jan
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
|
Score: +5
|
Good |
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
- You're not alone, Dexter. I have also been so high that I shaved my entire body.
- Really? I once was so high I shaved your entire body too. (Sorry, couldn't resist obvious joke). King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 01:27, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
|
Score: +5
|
Good |
- Good. An old thing of mine that failed both VFH and VFD. So, I'll accept Uncyclopedia's very own certificate of a happy medium.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 01:57, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Good. The VFD was really uncalled for, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:34, 27 January 2010
- Happy medium! pillow talk 06:52, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Tastes Good. I'd vote against because I like Snapple, but the article mentions The Piper on the Gates of Fruit Punch, one of my favorites by Peach Floyd. (Seriously, someone put this up for VFD? Well, some people blank pages too.) King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 01:22, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Hooray for mediocrity! -OptyC Sucks! CUN18:50, 28 Jan
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2
|
Good |
- Nom
and Good One of the funniest and most touching things I've seen on uncy. Sockpuppet Little Mermaid has long conversations with Rabbi Why, who is doing everything he can to welcome the innocent and charming sock to uncy and let "her" feel welcome here. What a masterpiece, on both sides. I ask the administrators to give amnesty to the sockmaster, who was operating two socks (at a minimum) at the time--both of them (at least two, maybe more) nominated and in the running for NotM! A perfect storm of sockdom. Aleister in Chains 4 January, MMX
|
Not Good |
- Meh. Although it's an excellent example of how to treat a noob, it later turns to drama, and I didn't find it funny... at all, really. pillow talk 00:47, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
- No. Encouraging sockpuppeting asshattery is not good or funny. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:54, 28 Jan
- Nope You're all right, please remove this from the list (or can I just remove it?). I still like the page, and agree that it is a wonderful way to treat a noob, but knowing both points-of-view while reading it is what made it funny for me. Aleister in Wonderland 9:00 28 Jan. MMX
- Any article that goes to -2 is considered failed and can be moved to the archive. I'd do it myself, but I am very, very lazy. pillow talk 21:16, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: +4
|
Good |
- Self Nom + Good I like this one, even if you don't. --C:\syndrome\_ 22:05, September 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Yes. It amused me. pillow talk 07:34, September 22, 2009 (UTC)
- Good. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:27, 23 November 2009
- Certainly not bad. -OptyC Sucks! CUN15:56, 30 Jan
- Very good Oh, the Lorax, he speaks for the trees. I've been missing that, and that makes the article good. Aleister in Chains 2:54 4 Feb. MMX
|
Not Good |
- Against. didn't really find it funny. --Mn-z 06:45, September 22, 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
UR A TARD!!!!!1 MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:08, September 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Timed out only +4 after 6 months. --Mn-z 00:49, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
|
Score: +1
|
Good |
|
Not Good |
- Nope. That conversation is amusing but not hilarious. If I'm going to "good" a talk page, it'd better be hilarious. pillow talk 07:37, September 22, 2009 (UTC)
- LOL. I remember this. Doog Tiems indeed, but still, per Hype. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:53, 28 Jan
|
Comments |
- Timed out nearly 6 months old. --Mn-z 00:49, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
|
Score: +5
|
Good |
- Self Nom and Good, this will not be featured for oblivious reasons, and needs a walk around the block to get it some exercise. Aleister in Chains 4 Jan. MMX
- Good. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:07, 19 January 2010
- Completely Disgusting. This is an absolutely tasteless topic, too tasteless even for Uncyclopedia, and has no redeeming social value whatsoever. I will demand you be severly punished and ostracized for even posting this here. Also do you know someone who likes to do it? (Also thanks for a Clara Bow reference.) King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 01:43, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Though, it's missing a link to something, but I can't quite put my finger on what that may be. -OptyC Sucks! CUN18:17, 28 Jan
- As long as you agree, consider it linked. Al Chained 9:10 28 Jan. MMX
- For. Thank god for photoshop. --Matfen 18:48, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
- Have listed on list of Good articles, but don't know how to archive the nom Aleister in Chains, 17 Feb.
- Passed and archived --Mn-z 00:49, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
|
Score: +3
|
Good |
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
|
Score: +5
|
Good |
- Nom and Good Found this. Apparently failed VFH a few years ago. And there is nothing in the world that I would love more than vote for articles on VFG, but I just couldn't be bothered reading them. ~ 17:55, Feb 2, 2010
- Sure. I remember that one. It's amusing. pillow talk 18:09, February 2, 2010 (UTC
- Good Held my interest, ate my popcorn. Aleister in Chains 00:56 3 Feb. MMX
- For. --Matfen 18:48, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Damn Atheists! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:49, 15 February 2010
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
- Have listed with the good articles, but don't know how to archive this listingAleister in Chains Feb. 17
- passed and archived --Mn-z 00:49, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
|
Score: +7
|
Good |
- Nom and Good I was going to put this up for VFH, then read the whole thing, and swung it by here. The cutest and cuddliest article, except when it's not, and then when it is again! Aleister in Chains 12:54 30 Jan. MMX
- Revolting. -OptyC Sucks! CUN16:01, 30 Jan
- Revolting, but in a good way. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:50, 15 February 2010
- Revolting and squirrel sex still brings back bad memories. --Mn-z 01:19, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Sure. There were some chuckles in there. pillow talk 08:03, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Reminds me of simpler times. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 18 Mar 2010 ~ 03:33 (UTC)
- Minty. It's Magically Fucking Delicious!!! 04:04,19March,2010
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
Voted Good 6-0. Yay.
- passed --Mn-z 13:10, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
|
Score: +5
|
Good |
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
- I wonder if we could string together several good animal articles and turn that into a feature? --Mn-z 01:59, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Voted Good on March 23rd. Yay, Spleen weasel. Al in Change 23:41 27 3 mmx
|
Score: +5
|
Good |
- Nom and for If I'm going to "good" a talk page it'd better be hilarious said a wise man once. Might have found it, and as I nom it the talk is still ongoing between a good
uptight upright Christian and a few defenders of the Uncyclopedia faith. ~ 18:28 22 2 MMX
- Pious For. --Matfen 19:05, February 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Minty. It's Magically Fucking Delicious!!! 04:04,19March,2010
- Guilty for—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 00:56, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Strengthened my belief in god. --nldr 02:22, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
|
Not good |
|
comments |
- Abstain is what I'm doing on this one. pillow talk 07:59, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
- 5-0 Good! Al en'chain 2:27 23 3 MMX
|
Score: +5
|
Good |
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
- Good. --Mn-z 18:13, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Good |
- Nom and Good I had fun with this one, and it seems good to me. And I'd like to get these couple of things in before VFG assplodes with popularity, which it really should. Aleister in Chains 2:14 18 3 mmx
- Minty. It's Magically Fucking Delicious!!! 04:04,19March,2010
- Gooey.-- 19:03, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
- For. --Matfen 16:19, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For. even though you removed the image of that pregnant chick. --Mn-z 18:04, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
- Good. --Mn-z 18:13, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
|
Score: +3
|
Good |
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
- Appears to have been featured. pillow talk 20:43, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
|
- archived --Mn-z 18:13, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
Score: +5
|
Good |
- Nom and Good A full, funny, and intelligent work (the last counts against it, sorry), I don't know how it failed VFH and maybe should get tossed in that manatee-infested pool again soon. Aleister in Chains 12:49 13 Feb. MMX
- good --Mn-z 00:51, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Good. I didn't truly understand much of it (which is why it failed VFH), but I can still see that it's good. pillow talk 08:01, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Good.-- 19:05, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Good. The guy who wrote this is a legend! --Matfen 16:18, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
|
Not good |
|
Comments |
- Good. --Mn-z 18:13, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
|
Score: +1
|
Good |
- Good - This has to be the best featured article ever. In anything, it should be featured twice. But not 3 times, because that would be pushing it. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 20:58, Mar. 22, 2010
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
- Wow, that's VFD-worthy, right there. pillow talk 21:03, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
- A Spiritual For, since it's been featured it's no longer eligible for "Good", but since it is good, a Catch-a-22. Aleister in Chains 21:09 22 3 mmx
- Probable INVALID NOM already featured, hence invalid I believe. Since it's Hype page, I'll let make the judgment call. --Mn-z 22:06, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Hype rules that we all make fun of this article in the Comments section. pillow talk 22:34, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Mn-z concurs. This article consists of little more than rabblecruft and random listcruft. If somebody created it now, I would give it an 80% chance of dying from ICU expiration, 15% chance of being QVFD'd/huffed on sight, and a 4.99975% of being VFD'd because it sneaked past ICU. --Mn-z 00:33, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Invalid Nom and no comments making fun of it of over a week. --Mn-z 18:13, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
|
Score: +5
|
Good |
- Self-nom + Good In the hopes that Dennis Kucinich's wife will read it, leave Dennis Kucinich's wife's husband, and walk by my side. Al sans chains 16:31 3 5 MMX
- Super for I didn't know Ally wrote this. It's one of my favorite non-featured articles! —Pelozurian (talk) 22:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- For Once it's done here, someone needs to remind me to VFH it. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:37, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Good. I grinn'd. pillow talk 18:41, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Nice. But what will Dennis Kucinich's wife's husband think?--Sirrah Catsh
irE Chess the Striker2117 03:41, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
|
Score: +4
|
Good |
- Nom and Good Of course! Poop throwing monkeys has survived VFH, VFD, and the scorn of the world at large. Yay Poop throwing monkeys! Aleister in Chains 2:21 18 3 mmx
- Geah! I'm sure this will fling it's way to the top. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 18 Mar 2010 ~ 03:33 (UTC)
- For. Per the Euroipods factor—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 00:56, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Ironically performed. --nldr 02:24, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Per the geah. --Paizu • Maj. • JStw • MUN • LOB • Crap • WHORE • (Talk) 16:41, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- • FreddCan Shredd • • • 16:54 • Sunday, 4-04-2010
- For. I believe that the Anthropologist throwing his feces allows this article to explain in a sentence what many philosophers write volumes to explain. An anthropological/sociological/psychological masterpiece!--Sirrah Catsh
irE Chess the Striker2117 04:36, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, Striker. You got the page. Al sans chains 1:49 7 5 MMX
- Aye. --Matfen 21:21, May 7, 2010 (UTC)
|
Not Good |
- not good the concept could be funny, but the execution is lacking somehow. --Mn-z 02:29, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Per Mn-z. pillow talk 18:24, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry - After giving it days of thought, I have to agree with Mnbvcxz. It's missing something I can't put my finger on. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 21:00, Mar. 22, 2010
- Not very funny Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 15:17, May 7, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Also, category spam is not funny. Try to get the categories down to about 25 or so. --Mn-z 20:41, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
- What I'm hearing is that it doesn't have the proper amount of categories. I theorize that if we multiply the current amount by a factor of 2 or Π the hilarity will increase exponentially. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 18 Mar 2010 ~ 03:33 (UTC)
- Just counted, and 84 of the categories are directly related to the page. Some of the other categories are jokes (but are meant to be jokes, so all pages entered into them fall into that description). A few of the others don't really fit, and the monkey afficienados will take your advice and remove them. So, bottom line, and with all due respect, this isn't category spamming, it's Poop throwing monkeys!!! Aleister in Chains 3:47 18 3 mmx
- Update. This occurred quite awhile ago, and since then the solely "funny" ategories were removed from the page and only relevent categories remained. 88 of them. Aleister sans chains 1:47 7 5 MMX
|
Score: +7
|
Good |
- Good This gem was written about a month ago by An Unemployed Pirate. I lol'd. —Pelozurian (talk) 01:21, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Hell Yeah. It's Magically Fucking Delicious!!! 02:02,29April,2010
- For. Per my hatred of old people. --Matfen 10:43, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
- For. per above. --Mn-z 17:15, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
- For. and Over the top to Good I was going to come back an vote for this and never did. Better vote before John McCain gets too senile to appreciate that he finally made good. Al des chains 16:34 3 5 MMX
- VFH! SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 16:53, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I agree with Fred, why isn't this on VFH?--Sirrah Catsh
irE Chess the Striker2117 16:57, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
- I didn't nom it for VFH because the last two articles I nommed there failed badly. —Pelozurian (talk) 23:31, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
|
Score: +5
|
Good |
|
Not Good |
- Meh. I kind of didn't like it very much, at all. pillow talk 07:59, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: +5
|
Good |
- Nom and self-whore I rewrote this about a million years ago on my old account (see difference between revisions here), and I think I did a pretty good job. —Paizuri MUN (Talk • Contribs • Poll!) 07:41, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- Ummmmmm Goood If an article about Orgasm Island isn't Good then I don't know what is. I've linked to this page a few times, and have also linked it into articles too. Al in Chains 10:54 1 4 mmx
- Minty. Though Whore Island is better. It's Magically Fucking Delicious!!! 19:24,1April,2010
- Wink WInk, Nudge Nuge, Say no More! Did Fappen give the term fapping its name?--Sirrah Catsh
irE Chess the Striker2117 03:48, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Sexy. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:02, 13 May 2010
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
- abstain I think is runs the joke into the ground too much. Or rather, it "breaks the deadpan" early on and then tries to re-establish innuendo. The title gives away what is about too much, which ruins future jokes. --Mn-z 17:58, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, that's what the article was called when I rewrote it. What would be a better title, in your opinion? --Paizu • Maj. • JStw • MUN • LOB • Crap • WHORE • (Talk) 07:24, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
|
Score: +5 deadly sins
|
Good |
- Good I nommed this for VFH a long time ago. It's still very funny. It's Magically Fucking Delicious!!! 00:48,23March,2010
- Good per above and it has a picture of a naked woman who might be pregnant. --Mn-z 00:29, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Good HOLY SHIT A TALKING SNAKE! --Sirrah Catsh
irE Chess the Striker2117 04:32, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Goodth Fixed some grammar, mostly commas, and some edits, and now it's GOOD!!! Al sans chains 18:17 8 5 MMX
- Good. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:05, 13 May 2010
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
|
Score: +5
|
Good |
- Good per vaginal sex in the missionary position between a lawfully married couple being hilarious. --Mn-z 05:01, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Good. Or, at least, not bad. pillow talk 19:36, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Good Straight jokes are the way of the future! --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 5:51PM 5/19/10
- Good As Mn-z should have said, per Mn-z wrote it and is trying to save its ass on VFD. Al des chains 20:00 22 5 MMX
- Splendid. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:19, 22 May 2010
- It's more than good... It's great! —Pelozurian (talk) 07:19, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
|
Not Good |
- Kerkill Sucks ball. A single, hairy ball. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:49, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
- You're just mad because the article mentions squirrel secks. --Mn-z 03:42, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Blame the one guy for me not being into squirrel sex. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:48, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
- You mean Gwax, who alerted you to that one series of articles? --Mn-z 03:51, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|