Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive239

Miss Papaya

Score: 9
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (9)	Kerkill This, everyone, is the kind of article that is supposed to be on VFD, not the stuff that you all bring here. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 12:15, May 4, 2011 (UTC) Destroy Mattsnow 13:29, May 4, 2011 (UTC) Schaizee. Or something like that. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 13:43, 4 May, 2011 (UTC) Fuck Dexter111344. He votes keep on the gayest articles. You heard me. The GAYEST articles! Except for once in a blue moon where an article like this turns up and even he can see that it sucks. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:03, May 4, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Unfunny. --Scofield 15:19, May 4, 2011 (UTC) The author didn't even do the list right.--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 15:35, May 4, 2011 (UTC) It's less ambiguous. The whole 'votes' bit is usually for the more ambiguous things, but we can vote and delete, yes we can. 1234 ~ 19:36, 4 May 2011 Radioactive! It's made by an I.P., so that makes it even worse. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 01:56, May 5, 2011 (UTC) Amazing facts! #1: Fruits! #2: Music!... #3:  Burninate! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 03:56 May 5, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Bloc Québécois

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Trainwreck of epic proportion Mattsnow 09:24, May 4, 2011 (UTC) lame -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 09:19, May 4, 2011 (UTC) Delete. In Quebec they would call this "le merde" --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:25, May 4, 2011 (UTC) Good gods, that's ugly... and stupid. May even be stinky, but I tried not to get too close. 1234 ~ 19:37, 4 May 2011 Nuke! Need I press the red button? --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 22:40, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Awkward turtle

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Fuck QVFD Gen. Fudgem0bile Is playing Urban Terror 04:51, May 4, 2011 (UTC) Delete. This sucks pretty hard. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:32, May 4, 2011 (UTC) I remember the handsign one. It was better, or at least it seemed to be. About... something. It got deleted. 1234 ~ 19:38, 4 May 2011 EXTERMINATE! This article has removed a favorite childhood memory--K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 22:13, May 4, 2011 (UTC) This is worthy of being n00btubed. Yay n00btubery! --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 22:43, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Next time remember the {{VFD}} (talk) 22:36, 4 May 2011

Blogger.com

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Delete. Long ago, some techie seems to have had something against the website. I cannot find anything funny here. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 10:26 May 3, 2011 (UTC) It`s not funny. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 12:27, 3 May, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Blargh! --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:59, May 3, 2011 (UTC) Shoot in the head A bitter recollection of a who cares event, by someone that did. Bing. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 02:18, May 4, 2011 (UTC) Delete~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 02:28, May 4, 2011 (UTC) BOOM! Headshot! Save yourself the bandwidth. Mattsnow 04:58, May 4, 2011 (UTC) Not funny. At all. 1234 ~ 06:16, 4 May 2011
Comments

Chunky Water

Score: 0
Keep (5)	Keep I love this. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:25, May 2, 2011 (UTC) Keep I don't love it, I do find it list heavy, mythology light, and full of obviously made up numbers, come on. But when I saw the title, I expected something similar to my first huffed article Black Water. And this was no Black water (excerpt from delete log)--K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 18:22, May 3, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Read this yesterday, it has hope and room for improvement, and is a pretty good idea to start with. Aleister 23:49 3-5-'11 Skept it. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:00, May 4, 2011 (UTC) Bitches like this like they like smiley faces. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 11:36, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Delete. A rotten, random Relic from 2005. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:06, May 2, 2011 (UTC) weak delete It is kinda funny in parts, but the article as a whole is a bit all over the place, and not exactly based on any real product. --Scofield 09:28, May 3, 2011 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! I don't think even ED would accept this. This has to be one of the worst things I've seen here. Please, please, please burninate immediately! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 10:09 May 3, 2011 (UTC) Weak Delete It could have been ok. It could have. Mattsnow 05:08, May 4, 2011 (UTC) Meh... has a couple of notions, but it's a chunky body of guuh. 1234 ~ 06:15, 4 May 2011
Comments	The Humourless Delete Squad is on the march again! mAttlobster. (hello) 11:38, May 3, 2011 (UTC) Yes, and just as the Zombie Slaying Squad must slay zombies the Humourless Delete Squad must delete the humourless. They are like the zombies of Uncyclopedia, shuffling, alive but lacking the "soul" of humor. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:57, May 3, 2011 (UTC) Like--K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 06:23, May 4, 2011 (UTC) Kept -- The Zombiebaron 14:18, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Siegul

Score: 3
Keep (2)	Weak Keep I think it has some good parts but needs a lot of work. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 14:15, May 1 2011 Keep. It's not that bad. A little re-write would make it ok, I agree with DeathbySnowman. Gee, how many snow-related weirdos here? Mattsnow 05:20, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Burninate! Hitler-ish pun on Seagull. Its primary subject is Nazi birds that poo A-Bombs... I think we should just A-Bomb this article. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 07:55 May 1, 2011 (UTC) Delete The premise is awful (German implies Nazi? How original.), the writing is adequate, but in the end it's the abuse of apostrophe's that does it in for me. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 13:58, May 1, 2011 (UTC) Delete. It's a one line pun unfortunately stretched out over an article without much coherence or logic.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:16, May 1, 2011 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! This just doesn't work without its longtime companion --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 01:06, May 3, 2011 (UTC) Strange connections and randoms have to actually work to work. This is just bad writing. 1234 ~ 06:09, 4 May 2011
Comments

Hadolf Itler

Score: 1
Keep (7)	Keep. Because the French *pedia has this, we've translated it as a courtesy to their Desencyclopedie to make their article look more cosmopolitan. For every Jerry Lewis they take, we need a Vincent Cassel. I am pretty sure French Desencyclopedie hates AAAAA --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 15:47, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Frosty asked, and a man who knew the history of the page answered. VFD couldn't have worked better. Yay! to both of ya. Aleister 22:04 29-4-'11 I may have used my too authoritative of tone but I don't know anything. The above is true, and my answer is based on how I would like things to be in a perfect interwiki world. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 22:10, April 29, 2011 (UTC) It's funny and I see no reason to delete it. Keep. Needs work, but I like it. De-redlink it and it should be fine. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 06:41 May 2, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Could definitely do with a fixer-upper but isn't quite bad enough to be baleeted, even if it is somewhat short, it's moderately amusing -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 11:01, May 3, 2011 (UTC) Keep MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:27, May 3, 2011 (UTC) I think when we put in the 24 hour rule it was also agreed that if five or more fairly regular users wanted an article kept it was kept. Seems like a good rule anywho. Aleister 23:52 3-5-'11 What are you implying about my bowels, Aleister? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:55, May 3, 2011 (UTC) Keep. It's not utterly funny, but it's entertaining. Mattsnow 10:58, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (8)	Delete. Can someone tell me why we need this? - Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 08:40, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Maybe it's better in French. The "say the exact opposite of everything" motif gets tired a third through. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:11, April 30, 2011 (UTC) Arguably, do we need anything? Anyhow, parallel universes aren't inherently funny and this really doesn't do anything special. 1234 ~ 06:32, 30 April 2011 Delete per these guys. --Black Flamingo 17:19, April 30, 2011 (UTC) Delete as we already have one. (I think.) DJ Mixerr 17:45, April 30, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig Delete. It may be good enough for other sister wikis but unless the translation is very Basil Fawlty, this is really arse achingly bad. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:22, May 1, 2011 (UTC) Delete Is it cute? Kind of. So why is it bad? Because it's exactly what its concept promises: a reversal of the truth. Again, this can be funny? Why isn't it? Because it acknowledges the fact that it's a reversal of reality. If this were an article about Hitler, the real Hitler, that claimed he was a somewhat famous artist persecuted by the Jews, then it would have more legs because it's a reversal of the truth that takes itself seriously. This, however, is a reversal of the truth that knows that it isn't real. The only conceit is this concept of a mirror world. That article is where this concept belongs. As a standalone, though, no. tl; dr - reversal of truth is only funny when it isn't self-aware.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 23:34, May 2, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Unfunny junk. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 23:30 May 03, 2011
Comments	apparently its part of a huge Bizarro world subpage area. So as you say a stand alone article gets lonely. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 03:16, April 30, 2011 (UTC) Kept -- The Zombiebaron 14:17, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

World War V

Score: 5
Keep (2)	Weak keep. It needs (quite) a bit of touching up but I don't think it has to die.--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 12:17, May 1, 2011 (UTC) Weak keep I agree -DeathBySnowman (talk) 14:23, May 1 2011
Delete (7)	Delete. this is dumb -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 08:21, May 1, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. Yet another poorly written wacky war full of sheer nonsense. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 21:36 May 1, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Fits pretty much in the wacky war box set..i.e. it's stupid and impossible to improve. So why bother keeping it? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:09, May 1, 2011 (UTC)  Burninate! just someone remember to move it to ?pedia --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 17:00, May 2, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Nonsense much? -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 11:11, May 3, 2011 (UTC) This seems to have only gotten worse since the original bloke wandered off. 1234 ~ 06:07, 4 May 2011 Delete. --ChiefjusticeWii 08:37, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

First war on terror

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. While the author clearly channels his retardation and psycho-schizo episodes through a creative and constructive medium, this type of material is just not suitable for Uncyclopedia. It's as though the author utterly failed to read the HTBFANJS and, with no regard for the standards set forth by this community, presented us with this abominable piece of garbage. I hereby nominate this article for deletion. --EMC [TALK] 05:12 May 3 2011 Delete. Agreed. This is a load of randumbo which does absolutely no justice to the title. --Scofield 09:25, May 3, 2011 (UTC)  Burninate! Anybody up for some MS Paint? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 10:13 May 3, 2011 (UTC) Put it down Can't see much in favor of this one. Aleister 23:55 3-5-'11 Delete~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 02:28, May 4, 2011 (UTC) Delete I laughed a lot! at the horrible formatting. Mattsnow 05:01, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Dagonius the Amazing Techno-Fag

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. I don't think it's funny. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 00:44, May 3, 2011 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! then  Burninate! then Delete. can we do that? --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 00:59, May 3, 2011 (UTC) It would have to be resurrected after each time, just so we could kill it again. We'd have to throw a Smite. in there somewhere, though! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 05:02 May 3, 2011 (UTC)  Propane -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 02:19, May 3, 2011 (UTC) YOYOYOYOYO!!!!DESTRUCT!!!!--Fcukman 03:58, May 3, 2011 (UTC) Disintegrate. Words cannot express how dumb this is. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 05:02 May 3, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Hey, Syndrome, is it alright if I break your new message drought on your talkpage? --(talk) 00:52, 3 May 2011 True fact: I didn't know for years that wiki software would display an alert when you get a new message, because no one would ever leave me a new message. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 02:00, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Stephen Williams

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Unfunny and filled with cruft. Vague enough that I can't really tell who it's supposed to be about. Nothing links there. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:53, May 2, 2011 (UTC) Delete. For real? or unvanity? --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 01:04, May 3, 2011 (UTC) Ew... What is this??? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 10:02 May 3, 2011 (UTC) Asplode!!! Written by his 12 year old friend. Mattsnow 05:14, May 4, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --EMC [TALK] 05:22 May 4 2011
Comments

Duplicate

Score: 3
Keep (8)	I can see the joke. --Mimo&maxus i am a cunt Hyperbole created this sig Bevanz provided the images 22:26, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Feature I really like this. -- 23:01, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Keep. I laughed. Mattsnow 23:19, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Keep. Clever. Clever. Aleister Aleister 00:23 00:23 29-29-4-4-'11-'11 Keep. I don't think his should never get featured - not enough concept - but I don't think it's bad enough to be deleted. I don't think his should never get featured - not enough concept - but I don't think it's bad enough to be deleted. ~  Talk 01:55, 29 April 2011 (UTC) Keep. I LOL'ed even though it hurt my head. It reminds me of the Redundancy article. DJ Mixerr 17:43, April 30, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig Keep. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 09:22, May 2, 2011 (UTC) keep keep This this is is a a good good article article. This this is is a a good good article article. --(talk) 23:35, 2 May 2011
Delete (11)	This was QVFD'd, but it seemed like there was too much there for me to delete on the spot. But I want it gone. I decided to come here instead of ICUing it because there is a strong likelihood that I can delete it in 24 hours if I put it here. So, yeah. This sucks.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 22:02, April 28, 2011 (UTC) I like your style. (talk) 22:56, 28 April 2011 It has a joke. So do most articles. Most articles have more than one joke, however, or at least a lot more of an overall joke, and are more not so obvious, or contain content... but this one really doesn't; it's basically a lower quality duplicate of the method of an existing feature, but without any of its other good qualities, and without adding any others. It is in fact merely difficult to read - tedious is a word. Tedious and unfunny. 1234 ~ 23:41, 28 April 2011 Basically, could be done much much better. If this doesn't get deleted (which it probably won't), then tag it rewrite. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:24, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Seemed clever at first, but in actual fact it's pretty bad. --Black Flamingo 02:59, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Kerkill Redundancy does it better. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:09, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Delete per Dexter. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 03:28, April 30, 2011 (UTC) Delete per Dexter. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 03:28, April 30, 2011 (UTC) Delete--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:31, April 30, 2011 (UTC) Delete. To quote: "Did you guys read the actual content, what few sentences it has? I'm curious?". Exactly. This is a fancy concept at first but when you actually read it as you would a normal article you realise that it's very short, not funny apart from the actual concept and even contains a few blatant grammatical errors. And yeah, it's basically a sub-par copy of Redundancy.--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:54, May 2, 2011 (UTC)  Burninate!Abstain I have never had an article speak to me like this one, It made my brain hurt, and I had to put it down and light a menthol cigarette. I don't smoke, so I had to get my shoes on and walk to the corner store and buy a pack, and do you know how expensive those things are? I decided right then an there, voting on no article is worth spending that kind of money just because it made my brain hurt, so I am not voting. hail Caesar. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 22:28, April 28, 2011 (UTC)--K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 23:41, May 2, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --ChiefjusticeWii 13:46, May 3, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Did you guys read the actual content, what few sentences it has? I'm curious. 1234 ~ 00:45, 29 April 2011 What? What? All all I I hear hear is is "Did you guys read the actual content, what few sentences it has? I'm curious?" so so only only half half of of what what you you said said is is understandable understandable.. Aleister Aleister 00:48 00:48 29-29-4-4-'11-'11 LOL LOL ((not not gonna gonna try try 2 2 sigs sigs))--K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 00:57, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Also Also Abstain. Abstain. I was going to vote to burninate, but then I remembered the old Transformers TV show. Anyone remember the totally radical one from the tubular Eighties, man? The Insecticons (bugs) would always repeat the last word they said in a sentence. I never actually knew whether to laugh or run away. This article makes me feel the same way. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 01:55 April 29, 2011 (UTC) I'm not going to cast a vote either way, but I think if this is going to be kept in the long run it needs to be funny for other reasons than that everything is duplicated. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 16:01, 30 April 2011

Shat

Score: 3
Keep (3)	Very Keep. We should have a 'Sharted' page also, for the high protein imbibers to appreciate...--Sycamore (Talk) 17:55, April 30, 2011 (UTC) Weak Keep Title is promising, but article is not that funny. I'll rewrite it with the tree fellow above me. --(talk) 01:49, 1 May 2011 If Lollipop then rewrites it, then I can say Keep.. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 04:50, 3 May, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)	EXTERMINATE! lists quotes poomor --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 08:49, April 30, 2011 (UTC) Too short -DeathBySnowman (talk) 15:47, 30 April 2011  Burninate! I had to make up my own jokes as I went along to make this funny. Yeech! --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 16:26, April 30, 2011 (UTC)::::what a great technique! I will have to use that --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 14:49, May 1, 2011 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! Utter shit! DJ Mixerr 17:41, April 30, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig EXTERMINATE! We already have an article on shit, do we really need another? Besides, this one is just awful and has no relation whatsoever to being past tense. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 03:00 May 1, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Unmitigated shit... or shat? -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 10:53, May 3, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. You know, this would be a good start for an article William Shatner. As it is, the, existing one, redirects to, an article on, Captain, James, T., Kirk. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 04:34 May 3, 2011 (UTC) Comment. I've deleted it. If either of you actually planned to use the existing shitty content for your rewrite, let me know and I will restore it to your userspace. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 10:58, May 3, 2011 (UTC) Though I appreciate the offer, that probably won't be necessary. I only see the title of this as being useful (and even that's shaky); the rest of it can go away. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 11:31 May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Seagull

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. This inspiration for Siegul listed below really isn't any good, either. The images are cool, but the article text is pure nonsense. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 07:55 May 1, 2011 (UTC) I agree -DeathBySnowman (talk) 14:18, May 1, 2011 Delete. First paragraph is pure random before it heads into a rant about chavs and pikeys. Not very original and not funny either. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:12, May 1, 2011 (UTC) Funny... but not in a good way--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 12:15, May 2, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:55, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

NEWI

Score: 2
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (2)	Delete. Real non-notable place that reads like a made-up place. The author probably has contempt for the school, but it's hard to tell what he's really getting at. Do we have a name for this sort of thing? If not, I propose a genre name: Made Up Vain Place (MUVAP). -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 09:27 May 2, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Bitter ex student of similar Uni? Can't tell or laugh. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 01:04, May 3, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Not really VFD-applicable; I'm calling Codeine's Mum on this. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 11:13, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

My Name is Earl

Score: 8
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (8)	Delete. This is as boring as crap! Delete it! Bhind45 06:55, May 3, 2011 (UTC) It sucks --EMC [TALK] 09:13 May 2 2011  Burninate! -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 09:13, May 2, 2011 (UTC)  Crufty, crufty, cruft!! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 09:16 May 2, 2011 (UTC) Delete.--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 12:11, May 2, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Death to Earl. Now. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 12:41, 2 May, 2011 (UTC) Meh tries to suck up to the injokes a wee bit too hard --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 16:55, May 2, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Bad. Very bad. --Scofield 09:22, May 3, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	please keep the olde tyme image --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 16:55, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

Prototype (engineering)

Score: 5
Keep (0)	Weak keep. It needs images and aa bit of work but I think it's not VFD-grade material.--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:25, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Not funny. YleerFPI 21:37, May 1, 2011 (UTC) Weak delete, if that makes any sense. I'm still saving it on my hard drive though.--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:25, May 2, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:58, May 2, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Boring and memey randumbo. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 10:15 May 3, 2011 (UTC) Delete. The first few paragraphs could have given way to something beautiful, unfortunately, they didn't, The initial concept could be worth reusing though. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 11:04, May 3, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	can someone fix the count - I have not had my adderall yet --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 16:57, May 2, 2011 (UTC) Yeah. There. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:58, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

HowTo:Write the Letter U

Score: -2
Keep (6)	Keep. I can see why perfect people with perfect penmanship and perfect comma placement and perfect spelling would not like this article. They read it and go DUH! But it serves an under-served contingency of our delinquent readers. Romans, come to mind. How many times have they tried to write USA, only to put VSA out of habit. This article is for them. The Romans. Keep is my vote, I vote Keep, hail Caesar. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 17:20, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Keep. I don't get the Cow Tipping part, but the rest is good, very random. A pic of a "U" would fit in nicely. Mattsnow 23:41, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Especially if Kevillips does a bit of cleaning up on the page. Aleister 00:32 29-4-'11 Keep. Needs a tiny bit of cleaning up, but it shouldn't die. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:28, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Needs a cleanup, but not terrible. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:16, April 30, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Amusing. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 03:31, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	I don't like it. <insert an actual reason here> <maybe> 1234 ~ 17:07, 28 April 2011 Delete. Completely gassy; the first line alone screams at the reader to read no further. Kevillips, "with formatting and spelling" it would continue to be completely gassy. Lyrithya doesn't justify her nomination, but you haven't defended this article. Spıke ¬ 18:06 28-Apr-1gassy writing1 You're right, I haven't. But until I am told not to, I will stand by my Keep. vote. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 18:31, April 28, 2011 (UTC) I too see promise in the title, but nothing else. --Black Flamingo 03:13, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --~  10:19, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	sure its on the dull side, most howtos are, with a little formatting and spell check, it will be fine,,,,,.--K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 17:20, April 28, 2011 (UTC) I have been trying to see the gas. Metaphorically speaking, I guess the article is without substance, resembling something not quite solid. Half our planets are termed gas giants. So Gaseous does not always have to be clear or even smoky. I guess my charitable instincts kick in , when I see potential based on title. Not a good quality all the time. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 01:08, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Titles... those are what UN:REQ and whatnot are for for. 1234 ~ 02:52, 29 April 2011 Okay, actual reason (I was a little... ah, out of it, before) - It's cute, the sort of thing that you can tell from the title that it could be something great, but unfortunately, the content really lets that down. The only glimses at humour come pretty much from insults, randomness and self-reference, without really doing anything with it... someone very well could adopt this and turn it into something, but as things currently sit (links, watchlists, etc), I don't see that happening. Y'all are welcome to prove me wrong, of course. 1234 ~ 00:36, 29 April 2011 Kept. --ChiefjusticeWii 21:35, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

William Morris Davis

Score: 0
Keep (4)	Weak keep. A real article about a real geographer/geologist. With a real photo-Shoop. User Vampire Knightmare touted it on the discussion page, and indeed stepped up and improved it. It needs more, but its {{Stub}} suffices. Spıke ¬ 02:36 26-Apr-11 REBEL SCUM!!! He is part of the Rebel Alliance and a traitor. Take him away! (Actually, keep him here so everyone can point and laugh at him). -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 19:55, April 26, 2011 (UTC) It can be improved. --~  18:13, April 27, 2011 (UTC) Weak keep. It's probably funny to geologists. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 03:41, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Delete. I recognize some of the names in the history but nobody seems to know how to give this article direction or content. Its premature, half formed body weakly sputters "killl.. meee". --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:01, April 26, 2011 (UTC) While the article does at least reference who and what the guy actually was, pretty much everything else appears to be complete nonsense, which really isn't worth reading. 1234 ~ 01:36, 27 April 2011 Yep, it sucks. --EMC [TALK] 04:08 Apr 27 2011 EXTERMINATE! There comes a time when even I cannot defend the whosits and whatsits that WP writes articles about. They refuse an article about Bieberhair yet write about this guy.--K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 00:00, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	--K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 00:00, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Is it a possessive? 1234 ~ 01:07, 28 April 2011 Is't not obvious? Rhetorical question, meant as a poke at my own shortcomings with its and it's --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 18:35, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Is it? 1234 ~ 00:11, 29 April 2011 It's funny 'cause we don't know--K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 00:42, April 29, 2011 (UTC) We don't? 1234 ~ 07:11, 29 April 2011 Kept. --ChiefjusticeWii 12:23, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

Married...with Children

Score: -6
Keep (8)	Keep. - WHAT THE HELL??? - Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 09:11, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Keep.EpicAwesomeness (talk) 13:46, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Long, clever, multiple angles, inside references, crossovers, wordplay. It may not be for everyone, but there is something for everyone in it. Just not always the same parts. oh and lots of funny pictures. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 15:34, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Keep. The nominator had written a page with a similar name that got huffed. Payback? I dunno. But I remember doing some writing and copyediting on Maniac1075's page, and it needs more (my eyes were burning after editing, and it took months to knock the horror out of them). Aleister 21:51 29-4-'11 it's so retarded that i can't help but love it --Roman Dog Bird 22:30, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Keep Joke nomination detected. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:21, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Eh, not great, but not deletion fodder. Fluency cleanup is what it really needs. 1234 ~ 06:28, 30 April 2011 What she said. --Scofield 11:21, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Delete. Hate it! -- User:Bhind45 20:41, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Horrible -- The Zombiebaron 09:10, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	If this is kept (and I hope it is) someone may need to proofread it. Just saying. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:09, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Kept --ChiefjusticeWii 12:23, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

The Worst Illustrated Article Ever

Score: -1
Keep (9)	I dunno, it's interesting, and I haven't seen this done here before. Not bad enough for VFD, imnho, or good enough for featuring. Somewhere in-between, which isn't so bad. Aleister 1:10 28-4-'11 Same here. It`s interesting. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 04:59, 28 April, 2011 (UTC) Love this. Keep it, put the latter article in a subpage maybe. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 09:16, April 28, 2011 (UTC) The subpage idea is a good one, or maybe even put in on the talk page (I use talk pages for things like that sometimes, and if I recall some other guy here has a talent for talk pages.) Aleister 9:44 28-4-'11 Keep For basically the same reasons I listed below. The fact that an article is made up of one picture has never been grounds for deletion. -- The Zombiebaron 17:17, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Per zombiebaron. --Mimo&maxus i am a cunt Hyperbole created this sig Bevanz provided the images 17:44, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Keep. (talk) 17:56, 28 April 2011 meh it is obvious the creator of this had very specific reasons to make the article the way it is. The concept is the epitome of humor and should be applauded in its effort to run counter to the mainstream edibility of wikitext in favor of images as an ironic turn. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 18:17, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Keep MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:38, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Keep~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 01:55, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (8)	Since the dawn of html text as images has been a no-no period. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 00:19, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Author takes the illustration that forms the complete contents of The Best Illustrated Article Ever, marks it up, and submits it as the complete contents of this page. Kill it for the selfsame reasons. Spıke ¬ 00:56 28-Apr-11 Delete A house built on a foundation of straw. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 03:16, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete and redirect to User:Hyperbole/Super_Secret_Girlie_Page! --Mn-z 04:39, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete. The joke was bad the first time... This is just dumb. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 06:17 April 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Puts the lame in blame. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:42, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete Reminds me of an...well it isn't good. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:47, April 28, 2011 (UTC) I really prefer the other one, but I figure these two should be merged and I'm not sure how that would work, so I'll just put a delete on both to annoy people. 1234 ~ 00:26, 29 April 2011
Comments	and and bad capitalization --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 It is old old old, and the wiki was much more wild wild west back then.--K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 06:36, April 28, 2011 (UTC)

The Best Illustrated Article Ever

Score: -3
Keep (8)	What do you mean you can't edit it? -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) Have you tried? its no wikiwikiway --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 18:58, April 28, 2011 (UTC) I made it, so obviously I want to keep it. All of you guys have the worst reasons for deleting this. "Text as image is bad", "the title sells the article", "I can't edit it", "it's old". I believe that you guys fail to understand the joke here. I made this page for a PLS, and entered it in the Best Illustrated Article category. Get it? Okay, so now we can stop this silliness and not delete my article. -- The Zombiebaron 17:13, April 28, 2011 (UTC) So it stays because it commemorates the way you won a prize by gaming the PLS rules? Spıke ¬ 18:10 28-Apr-11 What are you talking about?? I never "won a prize" for this article. In fact, if I recall correctly, it got less judge votes than The Worst Illustrated Article Ever. I'm not even going to adress your totally unfounded accusation that I "gamed the PLS rules". My reason for keeping this article is because it is funny. -- The Zombiebaron 18:18, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Keep. (talk) 17:55, 28 April 2011 Omnibaron. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:11, April 28, 2011 (UTC) meh it is obvious the creator of this had very specific reasons to make the article the way it is. ɹoɯnɥ ɟo ǝɯoʇıdǝ ǝɥʇ sı ʇdǝɔuoɔ ǝɥʇ and should be applauded in its effort to run counter to the mainstream edibility of wikitext in favor of images as an ironic uɹnʇ. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 Weak Keep. Mattsnow 23:27, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Keep "Rubbish but will be kept along with the other museum pieces here." -- Somebody below. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:35, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Lots of good reasons given above. Aleister 21:53 29-4-'11
Delete (5)	EXTERMINATE! Since the dawn of html text as images has been a no-no period. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 00:19, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete. It is a flagrant violation of the encyclopedia cover for a page name to not describe its contents but to sell itself; in this case, compensated for by nothing. The article is entirely an illustration; it is an illustration of text, when it could after all be the text. The goal is not to amuse the reader, but the author, with his own cleverness. Spıke ¬ 00:55 28-Apr-11 Delete It can't be edited. If you plan to make an article that can't be edited, it had better be gold the first time around. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 03:15, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate for using an image in place of text! It's considered bad practice in Web Design, and even worse for a wiki, since it can't be edited. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 06:04 April 28, 2011 (GMT) Zombiebaron. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 09:16, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Rubbish but will be kept along with the other museum pieces here. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:47, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Eh, it's okay, but I figure these two should be merged and I'm not sure how that would work, so I'll just put a delete on both to annoy people. 1234 ~ 00:25, 29 April 2011
Comments	and its old old old --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 Correction: I can't edit it without opening Photoshop, figuring out the font and size used to make the image, adjusting the whitespace so my edit fits on the image, etc. When judging how to vote on VFD, I consider an article's potential to improve, and this has none. Outside the context of the PLS, the article just seems random. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 17:19, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

List of weapons that exist, but shouldn't

Score: -5
Keep (6)	Keep. I have a weapon that exists, but shouldn't. It's scary, and uses live cats as projectiles. Iz true! Aleister 18:57 28-4-'11 Keep MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:25, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Keep. ~Formerly Annoying Crap 21:27, 28 April 2011 No never. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:46, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Conversation Sporked to Talk Keep Not read the article, but the sig of the deletion advocate...sort it out. mAttlobster. (hello) 00:33, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Four Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 01:49, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. Sucks. --Mimo&maxus i am a cunt Hyperbole created this sig Bevanz provided the images 18:49, April 28, 2011 (UTC) You didn't delete enough. That was an improvement, but please delete more. I don't care if this is an endeavour in pointlessness, dammit. 1234 ~ 00:39, 29 April 2011
Comments	Now you should semiprotect it so idiots don't add so much badness. Please? 1234 ~ 02:05, 29 April 2011 Sweet. 1234 ~ 02:50, 29 April 2011 And that's totally kelp. 1234 ~ 22:02, 29 April 2011

Anti-cube technology

Score: 9
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (9)	Eeeh? 1234 ~ 17:13, 28 April 2011 Good title, but that's it. (talk) 17:45, 28 April 2011 Delete. Technobabble and nonsense numbers, both serving no comedy strategy in explaining a nonsense thing. Spıke ¬ 18:08 28-Apr-11 De-1337 --EMC [TALK] 18:26 Apr 28 2011 Concession I could not do much with the concept. What is the concept? When the author tells me why its funny, I will work harder on it. For now I'm done. It's done. Put it out of its misery. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 18:55, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete. The effort was noble, but the jokes are falling flat. Mattsnow 22:49, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Eviscerate. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:35, April 28, 2011 (UTC)  KILL IT WITH FIRE - Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 07:04, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Smite. "Twist the space-time continuum into a Gilgamesh-like shape..." "Data farted at the Borg and blew them all up..." This makes for hilarious userspace material (I have a page just for this), but it should be obliterated at the mainspace level. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 11:00 April 29, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Qaddafi

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	This is cheap shit, its poorly written, short and unfunny. - Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 09:05, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete. (talk) 17:46, 28 April 2011 Delete. UnNews has for a month needed a link to the madman, though there are Aleph-1 ways to spell his name. However, this page, portraying him as a falafil and citing three-eyed spokesman Al-Salami, isn't it. Reality is much funnier than this article. PS--"BTW...UN say no bang-bang." Spıke ¬ 18:02 28-Apr-11 Delete. Unfunny. The version by EDiot, Gaddafi, is 100 times better. Mattsnow 22:52, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Leave this one in the desert to die. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:39, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Yawn. ~  Talk 02:45, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Cold Turkey

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Bit of work it would be just groovy... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
Delete (5)	This should go away. A badly written article about something that doesn't sound appetizing. It also looks like it's been unfinished for a while. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 07:28 April 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I agree - Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 07:29, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete. "although the exact origins...have been debated over the years it has become a widely believed fact" blah blah blah. Spıke ¬ 17:59 28-Apr-11 Making stuff up isn't necessarily funny, and this isn't. Unless someone really does intend to take over this and bring it into their hearth, may as well toss it. 1234 ~ 01:02, 29 April 2011 Delete. [[Insert good reason here]] [[Witty comment]] [[Laughter]] ~  Talk 02:49, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Comments

CACCPD

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	NUKE!! Due to my own error (forgetting the bloody VFD tag), the previous nomination was invalidated. I've since been given the okay to renom this. Let's burninate this vain pile of crap. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 05:20, April 28, 2011 (UTC) poop --Roman Dog Bird 05:56, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Yes. 1234 ~ 08:44, 28 April 2011 Delete. (Repeating:) The suburban social-work building five miles south of the Michigan capital is not a police department. But it seems that people are working out their animus against their department by documenting it in a fictional encyclopedia about a fictional PD. Spıke ¬ 02:28 26-Apr-11 Delete. ~  Talk 02:51, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Scams

Score: 7
Keep (0)	wait if this Nigeria thing is a scam, I can't afford to vote delete. My house is on the line. This thing should be moved to Uncyclopedia:Truths, or UnTruths:Scams, Before its too late!--K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 17:03, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (7)	Delete. and redirect to Scam letter Pup 03:51 27 Apr '11 Or just redirect it to scam letter without deleting it. Whatever works. --EMC [TALK] 04:06 Apr 27 2011 May as well. This doesn't have much. 1234 ~ 05:49, 27 April 2011 Delete. (talk) 06:04, 27 April 2011 Delete. Dumb. Then, listcruft; then, dumb HowTo. Spıke ¬ 17:10 27-Apr-11 Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:42, April 27, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. The real scammers are funnier than this. Another case of truth being stranger than fiction. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 00:13, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I sure hope the Nigeria thing is real, because that would be awesome --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 23:55, April 27, 2011 (UTC)

Yo-yo

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Misunderstood I think this poor article is just misunderstood. If you read with the perspective- it is funny, it is funny, it is funny. It kinda is. It's a lot funnier late at night with the laptop under the covers when your spouse thinks you are masturbating over there, but you're really trying t'read it as if it's funny. I vote Keep, Keep is my vote--K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 16:59, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Obliterate. Incoherent and overly random without actually leading anywhere. There is nothing in this article that actually pertains to a yo-yo. Completely pointless. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 04:43, April 27, 2011 (UTC) Pretty much. 1234 ~ 06:01, 27 April 2011 Yep (talk) 06:06, 27 April 2011 NARF! NARF! NARF Whatdoyaknow. There are people who can speak for five minutes extemporaneously, after hearing a subject such as Yo-yo, and have it be funnier than this. Spıke ¬ 17:13 27-Apr-11 Delete. Random cobblers. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:41, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	You know, you really should put a {{VFD}} on the article when nominating it... that'll oft invalidate a nomination, you know. 1234 ~ 06:01, 27 April 2011 Me and my big mouth... Thanks, Lyrithya! ^_^ -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 07:31, April 27, 2011 (UTC) Prematurely archived without minimal consensus? I don't know what that means but this article just got very lucky. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 08:15, April 28, 2011 (UTC)

Trigun Minimum

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. It wasn't badly written, it's just that... there's no funny. Ron Howard and Dick Cheney, nonsensical numbers, lots of fancruft and of course, the obligatory penises. Sheer nonsense that only fans of this might possibly understand. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 07:47, April 27, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. - Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 08:04, April 27, 2011 (UTC) Delete. This would be main-page stuff over at ED. But, as we all know now, ED.... Spıke ¬ 17:15 27-Apr-11 Delete. (talk) 17:31, 27 April 2011 Delete. Masterclass in crap. Just downright unreadable. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:40, April 27, 2011 (UTC) Delete. per everyone above. --HJ Mitchell → 22:54, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

HowTo:Die

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	List with bad grammar and no jokes. (talk) 20:51, 27 April 2011 Delete.'-DeathBySnowman' (talk) 22:10, 27 April 2011 Snore may I add hold breath waiting to laugh? --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 22:23, April 27, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. - Really unfunny. --HJ Mitchell → 22:54, April 27, 2011 (UTC)  Burninate! List of nothing. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 00:10, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Taking a REALLY BIG EXPLODING SHIT. I normally offer no opinion on the HowTo space, but this is awful. Spıke ¬ 01:00 28-Apr-11
Comments

HowTo:Upload and Edit YouTube Videos

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Feep Why not just change the name to Uncyclopdeia:HowTo UpLoad and Edit YouTube videos, so it can stay as an instructional page that we can point people too? I dunno. Aleister 1:14 28-4-'11
Delete (6)	As someone pointed out on the talk page: where are the jokes? (talk) 20:54, 27 April 2011 What is the point of this page? It fits on wikipedia...not here. Except the wikipedia version already exists. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 22:09, 27 April 2011 wtf. unfunny. --HJ Mitchell → 23:01, April 27, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. Haven't some of what they call the unfunny not known this was satire and get offended by untruths, maybe this is the article creator version of the same person. Granted, I know how, so did not read it, but it looks pretty darn truthy. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 23:35, April 27, 2011 (UTC) Delete. The goal of this page is not to make anyone laugh but to help them upload YouTube videos. It simply doesn't belong on this site. Spıke ¬ 00:58 28-Apr-11 Delete. See comments. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 01:30, 28 April 2011
Comments	Delete this and redirect it to my newest article in progress, HowTo:Get Featured on YouTube. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 01:30, 28 April 2011