Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive225

SOAD

Score: -1
Keep (4)	Cleaned up. (Formerly Delete.) I've pulled out the vandalism and inexplicable tangents, and strengthened the sense that the author is a drugged-out fan who thinks he sees hidden meanings in the music. (And added a photo. Yikes!!!) Everything but deleting the Discography, which anyone can do, and should. Spıke ¬ 13:29 28-Dec-10 Keep. I think that this article do not deserve it. Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)Leave me alone... 12:45, December 30, 2010 While restoring a little of the listcruft, Cat is apparently a fan of Armenian Metal and has helped us ridicule this band in its own accurate words. Spıke ¬ 18:17 30-Dec-10 Keep It is Christmas. The opening is weak but there's the odd barking cat lower-down. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:34, December 30, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Can be worked. --Shabidoo 03:26, December 31, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. Dismal bandcruft. This article was apparently written by a 12 year old boy who cannot speak english properly. Just read through and see how many mistakes the rim-jobber made. --Count of Monkey Crisco 12:09, December 28, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Apart from the inability to render this acronym in all capitals, the article is nothing but a list of band members--with childish cheap shots on each--and then the usual discography listcruft. But Count, trusting that you have scanned the history for a cleaner version, rather than give us an excerpt of the obvious vandalism throughout this article, why not pull it out first? Spıke ¬ 12:31 28-Dec-10 Delete. Some feeble attempts at random humor are the only redeeming points of this article. Obviously, not good enough. --Scofield 13:17, December 28, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Please. Is it even remotely funny? DJ Mixerr 23:00, December 30, 2010 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig
Comments	Comment. Older versions do not contain the vandalism, but they do contain some randumbo about man eating crabs and Turkish bridges. I guess there's an "optimum" version somewhere, but it would only be marginally better. --Count of Monkey Crisco 12:54, December 28, 2010 (UTC) System Of A Down exists, but redirects to Blue Screen of Death. Spıke ¬ 13:01 28-Dec-10 Shouldn't System Of A Down redirect to SOAD? → I am greatSoup? 20:11 28-Dec-10 ← If this is Kept, I'm going to move the meat to System of a Down and point both others there. Spıke ¬ 20:32 28-Dec-10 I don't get it. 1234 ~ 01:52, 30 December 2010 Lazy sods. --Roman Dog Bird 02:14, December 30, 2010 (UTC) No that's Stormtroopers of Death. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 22:57, December 31, 2010 (UTC) Kept ~ 23:03, December 31, 2010 (UTC)

Anus

Score: -3
Keep (4)	Keep. We need something under this title, and anyone who clicks on it deserves what he gets. It is random wibble, except that Section 4 (on the village of Anus, France) is excellent--because it's about something--and the article might lead with it. Predictably, Uncyclopedians spent all their time on Asshole (in the See Also list) and it wouldn't be a loss if this article redirected to that one. Spıke ¬ 12:28 28-Dec-10 Stronger Keep. The casting of Anus as a polytheistic God was in fact pulled off masterfully. I took care of the red-links and deleted some vandalism, the Anusfest, and the photo of coyote poop that tried to pull this in a different (and junior-high-school) direction. Spıke ¬ 14:00 28-Dec-10 Keep. SPIKE Saves Anus!, stop the presses. Aleister 14:02 28 12 Still needs work, but keepable. 1234 ~ 15:03, 28 December 2010 Specific as always. Try it now. Spıke ¬ 17:32 28-Dec-10 Meow? And what, exactly, has the French town have to do with the rest of it? 1234 ~ 01:21, 30 December 2010 Um, it's named Anus. Spıke ¬ 11:21 30-Dec-10 It also seems to have entirely nothing conceptually to do with the rest of it. Unless you can make the ideas flow more, have it have something to do with what you lot are insisting Anus is, I'd suggest getting rid of it. Or am I missing something? 1234 ~ 14:45, 30 December 2010 Not huffable as is. Who is this SPIKE? I've seen his name around lately. Aleister 2:09 29 12 You already voted. You know that, but people keep "fixing" the count. Spıke ¬ 11:21 30-Dec-10 I know this is pretty much a done deal, and that it'll be removed from VFD sometime soon, but I didn't see this before. Very creative making it into a god, SPIKE, that was a funny read. → I am greatSoup? 18:28 30-Dec-10 ← That was there from the beginning. The most I did is trim it down so you would see it, rather than say tl;dr and write it off. Spıke ¬ 18:40 30-Dec-10 I knew this was going to happen. DJ Mixerr 22:57, December 30, 2010 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig Oh, okay... well, cool anyways. → I am greatSoup? 00:09 31-Dec-10 ←
Delete (1)	Surely the great minds here at Uncyclopedia can come up with something better then this shitty article for such an inherently funny topic as this. -- The Zombiebaron 08:34, December 28, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Kept ~ 23:02, December 31, 2010 (UTC)

Helen Hunt

Score: -2
Keep (6)	Keep. Needs some work, sure, but it isn't bad enough to take it out back and shoot it. Some pretty good lines in there, and it actually sticks pretty much to Hunt's career. She is just about the most boring actress in Hollywood though, and maybe this page should be merged with boring. Aleister 3:33 27 12 Keep. Some funny bits in there, also what Aleister is said.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:07, December 27, 2010 (UTC) Keep MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:36, December 28, 2010 (UTC) I'm starting to see some redeeming value, here. 1234 ~ 14:42, 28 December 2010 Keep. Save to Aleister. What remains of the dirty joke is now done tastefully enough to be funny to more than just Beavis and Butthead. Spıke ¬ 01:57 30-Dec-10 Keep. :) --Shabidoo 03:26, December 31, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Delete. INB4 Myocardialinfarction, who slapped {{VFD}} on the article itself, just one big dirty joke. Spıke ¬ 03:17 27-Dec-10 Rescinded. Spıke ¬ 14:11 28-Dec-10 Delete. Yup. I didn't put it on here since the preview looked wierd in my browser, and I don't want to pollute this page. But YES! DESTROY this not very good page. Thank you to Spike. Myocardialinfarction 03:26, December 27, 2010 (UTC) You're welcome. Polluting this page is my business. Spıke ¬ 03:28 27-Dec-10 Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:07, December 27, 2010 (UTC) I'm really not seeing the redeeming value here... though perhaps Aleister's onto something with this merger idea. 1234 ~ 20:57, 27 December 2010 Delete. It sucks. --Scofield 13:09, December 28, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It's one of those LOLwut articles without the laughs. Smuff [The cake is a lie.] 14:50, December 29, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	MMnkay, keep. I'll put other comments on the talk page. Myocardialinfarction 17:41, December 28, 2010 (UTC) Kept ~ 23:00, December 31, 2010 (UTC)

Reimu Hakurei

Score: -2
Keep (3)	Didn't she do 'Caramelldansen'? Weak keep. The "Uncyc universe" involves bending game characters to themes such as anal rape. The theme here, excess body hair, seems tame by comparison and the writing is good. Wikipedia:List of Touhou Project characters implies that RH, being from a PC-98 game, is now "obscure," but the blemishes in this article--occasional memes, a nonsense number, and lack of paragraphs and photos, could be fixed if more savvy users think it's important to have such a page. Spıke ¬ 00:13 25-Dec-10 Are you aware of any "more savvy users" in particular? If none are found within a reasonable time, isn't that an argument for userfication? --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 00:59, December 25, 2010 (UTC) Am soliciting additional data, and not from anyone in particular. If I don't get it, it doesn't change the vote. If fans say no one plays this any more, it does undercut my vote and I'd flip. Spıke ¬ 01:09 25-Dec-10 Could you clarify from where you are "soliciting additional data"? What is the status now? --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 00:37, December 26, 2010 (UTC) The status now is that there are two Delete votes, and my Keep vote. Spıke ¬ 00:47 26-Dec-10 The status today is that I've done a copy edit and struck out the above comment that "the writing is good." It often said the same thing in two different ways and at one point inexplicably switched to the vivid present tense. I see what you're saying; apart from the two themes of armpit hair and a female-dominated world, the still-overlong narrative will appeal only to people who actually played specific levels of the game. I weaken my Keep vote and let's see if anyone else cares. Spıke ¬ 13:26 26-Dec-10 Saved. I've added three photos--as it turns out that there is touhou.wikia.com with lots more on these characters, which settles the relevancy question to my satisfaction. And have copy-edited the whole thing; while there are still boring plot details--and I don't know which are essential--there is now commentary of general interest (at least to general males cynically contemplating an all-female fantasy world). Spıke ¬ 22:49 26-Dec-10 Yeaallright. You did good. *pats SPIKE on the head* 1234 ~ 23:19, 26 December 2010 Not as good as Sony became, but it's keepable. Spıke ¬ 23:30 26-Dec-10 Keep. And there are some users who don't think SPIKE should win WotM. Proof in the pudding and all. Good save. Aleister 2:45 27 12
Delete (1)	Kill it with fire bullet hell because it is too long and fancrufty/not well connected to the rest of the Uncyc universe. Note that there is already a cut-and-pasted userfied copy here, but if possible I'd like to have it userfied with the history properly preserved to the creator's userspace User:Shivers1231/Reimu Hakurei, in case someone wants to work on this further or transwiki it somewhere (Illogicopedia?). (Admittedly, the creator is no longer active.) --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 23:25, December 24, 2010 (UTC) Eh, I'm with the processor, or whatever that is, on this one - too specific and fancrufty. If it cannot even approach a wider audience in its current form, what place has it in any general encyclopedia, let alone one where humour is paramount? Sure, everyone won't get every bit of anything, but the general point shouldn't be completely lost, either. 1234 ~ 02:21, 25 December 2010
Comments	What do you mean by "Uncyc universe"? – Preceding unsigned comment added by Mnbvcxz (talk • contribs) It didn't really mean anything; I was just trying to explain "fancrufty" for the people who may not be familiar with the term. --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 00:59, December 25, 2010 (UTC) In response to SPIKE above, my understanding is that 1) the Touhou fandom doesn't align perfectly with the set of players of Touhou games; 2) Reimu has been a playable character in all the mainline (integer-numbered) games at least; 3) Marisa might be marginally better known among people who follow the fandom but don't play the games. I could be wrong, though, since I'm not usually involved with Touhou in any way. Oh, and my request for userfication in the event of a decision to delete still stands. --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 00:37, December 26, 2010 (UTC) The property value bit is a good chuckle atleast. --Shabidoo 03:26, December 31, 2010 (UTC) Doing my part for the copy-editing: I removed "also known as Ganondorf" from the article's lead. Any objections? Also, I have struck my request for userfication now that the article seems likely to be kept. --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 06:34, December 29, 2010 (UTC) Kept ~ 22:59, December 31, 2010 (UTC)

Game:Oregon Trail and subpages

Score: 1
Keep (5)	I think It's quite good. No need to be deleted --M&M (christmas mood) 15:10, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Maybe it's unfinished, but what's there is more than adequate. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:53, 23 December 2010 Keep. Good game, just because nobody cares about it doesn't make it bad. - Another n00b 17:02, December 24, 2010 (UTC) Not only is it incomplete, it also has a "work in progress' template. Whatever this game does have looks very promising, so I'd suggest somebody work on it. --Scofield 08:36, December 29, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Keeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep !!! --Shabidoo 03:26, December 31, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Yet another game, ain't done... some of it is actually quite good, though, relatively speaking. It held my interest, at least, that whole box thing, more than any others have so far... problem is, the game a, ain't done and probably won't get to being done, since the main contributor, Kglee, apparently hasn't been on in about a year, and worked on the game in two... and b, the random thrown in is just... random. I mean, grues? Sharks? Furries? Nooo... 1234 ~ 05:22, 23 December 2010 Yes -- The Zombiebaron 06:34, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Too much misdirection and going nowhere. --Mn-z 16:17, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Uh Uh--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 19:50, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Vote for deletion. --Black Flamingo 11:29, December 30, 2010 (UTC) Kerkill Yeah, like I said before, the featured article about the Oregon Trail suffices for me. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 18:02, December 30, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Mimo&maxus: Then would you be willing to finish it? It is far from done, and nothing decent appears to have been added since the original author gave up; it has, in fact, only gotten worse. 1234 ~ 15:18, 23 December 2010 It will be the first time I'm writing a game article but I'll try to improve it. --M&M (christmas mood) 15:26, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Alright, I tried to improve it. --M&M (christmas mood) 15:54, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Problem is, it needs more than a paint job. Adding a couple of pages is probably a start, but the whole framework, plot and structure, it just sort of ends, and the sporadic random sprinkled through would at least need smoothing over so that it fits better, as well... 1234 ~ 16:37, 23 December 2010 Looks that I can't save it now. I give up. --M&M (christmas mood) 16:45, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Shame... it could have been good if anyone just had a few weeks to waste on it... *shifty eyes* 1234 ~ 19:58, 23 December 2010 If it is kept, I would have the time to finish it in January. However, we already have a featured article about The Oregon Trail game which I kind of think is enough. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:03, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Shiny; it shall be all yours, love. Aaaaall yours. Changing my vote would take too much effort, though. 1234 ~ 17:56, 24 December 2010 Whoa!!!, I remember this. I could even finish it if you guys really (And I stress really) wanted... but it would take time. If it takes up too much bandwidth I can understand. Neutral vote from the Original Author. --Kglee 09:24, December 31, 2010 (UTC) Please do; it does indeed look like it shall be kept, and Dexter seems even less enthusiastic. Besides, it was your game... 1234 ~ 17:36, 31 December 2010 Whoa! This has been on VFD for more than 204 hours! Tell me that's a record, people! --Scofield 18:11, December 31, 2010 (UTC) Recored achieved & Kept. ~ 22:52, December 31, 2010 (UTC)

Cubic Missile Crisis

Score: -1
Keep (4)	Keep. Amusing - just not bad enough.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:25, December 30, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Historic page per below, amusing per above, It's a pun, but played out into a story that makes a little sense. If someone works on it maybe keep Savethemoose's words and work around them, for the history of it. Even first articles should have been polished over time, though. Hmmmm. Maybe we should make a forum of first articles! Sounds kind of fun.Aleister 20:29 30 12 Keep. Deleting this is overzelous and very mean spirited. There are more chuckles in this than most articles. Has a couple nice original ideas. Nice image. Mean spirited! --Shabidoo 03:26, December 31, 2010 (UTC) Keep. I can see quite a strong concept here. Better to work on it than delete it. --Scofield 12:23, December 31, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. Here's an idea, let's take a really, really weak pun and try to stretch it into a wacky war epic. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:59, December 30, 2010 (UTC) Whacky, all right. Fairly unloved... shame. 1234 ~ -- 06:41, 30 December, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Dumb. Spıke ¬ 10:55 30-Dec-10
Comments	Shame, shame, SHAME on all of you for voting against Savethemooses' very first article! I only hope Hell is hot enough. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 11:08, Dec. 30, 2010 I'm voting on articles, not people, and this article is dumb. Perhaps he has a userspace? Spıke ¬ 11:46 30-Dec-10 No, you're dumb, nanny nanny boo boo. Also, you'll notice I didn't vote. :P -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 22:36, Dec. 30, 2010 If we delete this something else will become his first article, perhaps something less embarrassing. This is like a museum displaying the bed Thomas Jefferson raped his first slave in. --Count of Monkey Crisco 14:03, December 30, 2010 (UTC) I would totally buy that bed, and use it for more rapes. In Soviet Russia the slave rapes you. Aleister 11:30 New Years Eve MMX Kept ~ 23:08, December 31, 2010 (UTC)

Sir Hamsterlot

Score: -3
Keep (5)	Keep. I admit it's a bit weak and the joke borrowing quite blatant but the article is coherent, illustrated and comes with footnotes. I would let this hamster run a bit more, don't think it deserves removal. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:01, December 30, 2010 (UTC) Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:46, December 30, 2010 (UTC) It's cute. In a... wow, whoever wrote that hates itself, sort of way... is it bad that I find that funny in of itself? 1234 ~ 14:54, 30 December 2010 Keep Something rather beautiful about this. I've come to the conclusion that perhaps most of the really bad articles from the past have now been deleted and that we live in times where the worst isn't in fact that bad. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:26, December 30, 2010 (UTC) Keep. I dont think this article is so bad that it will send people running away from the website. Its cutesy and a tiny bit funny.
Delete (2)	Delete. Oh man it tries, it tries so fucking hard but it's just not funny. The whole thing reads like some sort of Monty Python and the Holy Grail fanfic. Anything funny in the article is lifted from that movie. The rest is ramble about a made up character and huffing. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:45, December 30, 2010 (UTC) Delete. The self-important footnotes are the worst aspect. I don't remember my Monty Python enough to see any direct plagiarism, but if it's in there, this overrides the fact that it's a complete job. Is this funny or just cutesy? Spıke ¬ 11:08 30-Dec-10
Comments	Kept ~ 23:06, December 31, 2010 (UTC)

Freaknik: I didn't do it!

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. A painfully unsuccessful attempt to mix multiple unrelated subjects with no central theme. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:29, December 30, 2010 (UTC) Delete. What he said. Spıke ¬ 11:14 30-Dec-10 Actually, I think that might merit a delete - not well written, can't even tell if it's supposed to be anything, though by the comments of the two above me, it seems unlikely... they are less clueless about these things than I am, right? 1234 ~ 14:52, 30 December 2010 Randumb and memes that have absolutely nothing to do with the subject, an animated movie that premiered on Adult Swim. → I am greatSoup? 18:20 30-Dec-10 ← Delete. Article that reads as a 'biography' of a rap artist who doesn't even exist. Only redeeming point is the picture of the album cover. --Scofield 17:15, December 31, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	What exactly is this? I mean, is it actually supposed to be something? 1234 ~ 14:50, 30 December 2010 (See: Freaknik: The Musical) → I am greatSoup? 18:20 30-Dec-10 ← That's... confusing. 1234 ~ 23:37, 30 December 2010

Los Chiyorkphigo, New Jersey

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. General badness from 2005. --Count of Monkey Crisco 04:08, December 30, 2010 (UTC) Nice and random, at least. 1234 ~ -- 06:41, 30 December, 2010 (UTC) Delete. This one, by comparison, starts with a nonsense number. Concept is a stereotype of large American cities, but says nothing about them except that everyone is named Oprah, a non-joke with no point. Spıke ¬ 10:54 30-Dec-10 Kerkill Just made up crap about a place that doesn't exist. The best part was the stuff about the guy's nose getting ripped off in a spar with a guy who didn't have a sense of smelling. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 18:35, December 30, 2010 (UTC) Delete. The perfect candidate to be VFD'd. --Scofield 16:55, December 31, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives

Score: -6
Keep (7)	Yay! A list of memes! Except it's not all memes... meh, better than the usual list. 1234 ~ -- 06:41, 30 December, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Per what I said last time. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:23, 30 December 2010 Keep. Closer to being a feature than just a bog standard article.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:26, December 30, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Repaired some truly crappy writing in the front matter. Spıke ¬ 14:39 30-Dec-10 What if-- the Most Wanted were chosen not because some twerp wanted to cut down some celebrity, but because the "criminal" were a clickable link to one of Uncyclopedia's best ten articles on crime and punishment? Spıke ¬ 16:47 30-Dec-10  Naw, I found it to be pretty funny. Seems to be fairly attractive looking, nice layout and pictures, and it doesn't have that many memes. I am also intrigued by SPIKE's idear. As it stands, it is just arbitrary celebrities that the author(s) felt like picking out. → I am greatSoup? 18:10 30-Dec-10 ← And, by "not that many memes", I mean that, yeah, there are quite a few, but it isn't just randumb memes thrown everywhere. → I am greatSoup? 18:12 30-Dec-10 ← Keep. There maybe should be some category of "enough already" if a page passes two or three deletion attempts. SPIKE's idea works, yet would take some work, and many of the top 10 are pretty funny. From a quick look Ronald McDonald should be saved, just because every actor and mcdonalds official that had anything to do with him should not only be jailed but put in solitary. And Jack Sparrow is alright, many others. Will look at the page closer at some point later. This 24-hour rule on VFD is one of the best innovations I've seen since coming here as a noob three or four months ago. Aleister 18:24 30 12 Keep. Keep --Shabidoo 03:26, December 31, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. You know those stupid Wacky War articles where celebrities, memes and cartoon characters do a bunch of wacky war stuff. Well, this is a lot like that, except celebrities memes and cartoon characters are now doing a bunch of wacky crime stuff. The results are just as irritating. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:55, December 30, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	The beginning doesn't read like an encyclopedia. The end, though attractively laid out, is a list, which never makes a point except that you can deliver a witty cut-down to a celebrity merely by putting him on the list. So the article has attracted listcruft and Anons. Rightmost column of nonsense numbers adds nothing. Spıke ¬ 11:01 30-Dec-10 Survived on 1-Aug-10, 6-5. Spıke ¬ 14:23 30-Dec-10 Kept --ChiefjusticeXBox 07:22, December 31, 2010 (UTC)

Fidel Castro's Hurricane Cannon

Score: -7
Keep (8)	Keep. Amusing. --Sycamore (Talk) 12:24, December 30, 2010 (UTC) Keep This is bonkers. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:35, December 30, 2010 (UTC) Keep Not seeing the issue here. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:52, December 30, 2010 (UTC) Bevanz did a pretty good expansion of it. The delete voters should go read it again. I feel like they'll change their minds. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:51, December 30, 2010 (UTC) Jeez, you sure replied quickly lol... Thanks, though. → I am greatSoup? 20:02 30-Dec-10 ← Keep Needs work, but even as is contains a really good and unique premise. If someone finds out it was stolen from somewhere - like the Da Vince Code was stolen from all the Holy Grail books as well as the U.K.'s 2001 "Revelation" film - I'll switch to delete. But such a good idea deserves clemency. Aleister 18:29 30 12 Keep. I liked the concept, so I thought a rewrite was in order to make it more encyclopedic sounding. → I am greatSoup? 20:02 30-Dec-10 ← Keep. (Formerly Delete.) It might still be total crap but it now reads like history. Spıke ¬ 20:28 30-Dec-10 Oooo! There's an article now! Yaaaay. 1234 ~ 22:16, 30 December 2010 Keep. Keeeeeeep --Shabidoo 03:26, December 31, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. A a stub which says nothing. --Count of Monkey Crisco 04:15, December 30, 2010 (UTC) Er... right. Interesting idea, almost no implementation... 1234 ~ -- 06:41, 30 December, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Worthless. The concept is a stretch, and the nonsense number and instruction-to-the-reader are the final blow. Spıke ¬ 10:52 30-Dec-10
Comments	I want to see some breaking up a number of voters, as they time and time again vote the exactly same way (i.e ABC and D are too chummy a lot of the time). --Sycamore (Talk) 12:24, December 30, 2010 (UTC) There's an irreconcilable schism between "Uncyclopedians with standards" and "microcephalic hyena people who mindlessly guffaw at any insipid drivel". --Count of Monkey Crisco 13:59, December 30, 2010 (UTC) The standards of your contributions, per the fact that this page is the bulk of your contributions here?--Sycamore (Talk) 15:19, December 30, 2010 (UTC) The nominations on this page right now disprove that anyone is merely following someone else. That people disagree with you is not proof of a conspiracy. Spıke ¬ 14:18 30-Dec-10 No one said conspiracy, lazy bandwagon hopping possibly? - a legitimate concern with this page.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:19, December 30, 2010 (UTC) When people provide reasonable arguments, is it really bandwagon-hopping? I know if someone is convincing enough, I do sometimes vote delete/keep when I otherwise wouldn't, for things I had not noticed or points I would not have considered... 1234 ~ 15:27, 30 December 2010 If you break the collective, the collective does not function. You are a break in the collective. You will be assimilated. But seriously, we don't always agree. That we do a lot of the time may have more to do with the standards we apply to the articles than who we might happen to be or be chummy with. 1234 ~ 15:13, 30 December 2010 I broke your long line. Prepare to be word-wrapped. Spıke ¬ 16:52 30-Dec-10 That's odd; it already word-wrapped on this browser... although now that I think of it, yours doesn't even support the word-wrap css property... 1234 ~ 16:58, 30 December 2010 Never said you always agree:)--Sycamore (Talk) 15:19, December 30, 2010 (UTC) Haha, love the Borg reference lol → I am greatSoup? 20:49 30-Dec-10 ← Kept --ChiefjusticeXBox 07:21, December 31, 2010 (UTC)

Bassoon

Score: -4
Keep (5)	I cleaned it up quite a bit, got rid of the lists and other stupid stuff, though I kept some of the things from some lists to be used in the rest of the article. I didn't really rewrite much, however I am still gonna do some more work on it. I think a classical instrument such as this deserves representation on Uncyclopedia → I am greatSoup? 22:03 27-Dec-10 ← Keep. (Formerly Meh.) Bevanz with the save. Spıke ¬ 22:50 27-Dec-10 It got a bath. 1234 ~ 23:06, 27 December 2010 Keep. Nice work! I was hoping someone would save this, just for the sake of that bassoon pic running along the side. Aleister 1:59 28 12 Keep.Much better. Simsilikesims 03:11, December 28, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. A lot of these musical instrument articles are pretty shoddy but this one contains enough compound suckage that it's in the delete range. All these articles suffer from pseudo vanity for about the people which play them but there's also the more typical plague of randumbo, cliche and lists, lists and more lists. --Count of Monkey Crisco 07:12, December 27, 2010 (UTC) Now that's just bad writing... although if someone wants to clean it up, stick it to some point, I'll support them. It's just terrible as it is, even with some amusing notions thrown in. On the plus side, I'm pretty sure I had this headache before I started reading, and it's not related, though. 1234 ~ 21:00, 27 December 2010
Comments	Meh. Reading the intro's list of countries that use the bassoon to disperse protesters, I was preparing to say you could substitute any musical instrument, but then it gets specific to the bassoon. There's randomness and lists, but the main problem is that it was obviously written by a dope-smoking gamer, and there are only two things they really want to write about. Bassoonists as sexy was excellent but must be less Joe Cool--but see above under Dope. Spıke ¬ 10:09 27-Dec-10 Kept. --ChiefjusticeXBox 22:08, December 30, 2010 (UTC)

Baboon

Score: 8
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (8)	Delete. Started as a wibble bomb in 2006. Stayed like that ever since. --Count of Monkey Crisco 13:35, December 28, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Totally random; almost totally not about baboons. Spıke ¬ 13:46 28-Dec-10 Delete. I was looking through this article to see if I would want to save it, since it rhymes with Bassoon, but there is literally nothing from the article I would keep, and I really don't want to write a whole article on baboons at the moment, so DELETE. → I am greatSoup? 20:09 28-Dec-10 ← Oh no you don't If there's a page about out friends the Baboons it should be about Baboons and not about every random thought that enters the brain after a drug session. This should be shipped to ?opedia C.O.D. Aleister 2:07 29 12 MMX Delete. Utter rubbish. --Scofield 08:30, December 29, 2010 (UTC) lol Dr. Phil --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:17, December 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:40, December 30, 2010 (UTC) o_O 1234 ~ 01:54, 30 December 2010
Comments

Boring

Score: 4
Keep (4)	Keep. Not too bad. Some nice lines in there.--Sycamore (Talk) 20:30, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Not all that bad for boring, and the pics make the page for me. A bunch of boring nothing pics, esp. that first one, this page may be actually genius. And lots of work put into it, but especially the pictures. I'll get rid of that stupid quote though, and put in a few minutes on it, maybe others can make it more interestingly boring too. Aleister 23:42 Festivus MMX Yeah, the page has redeemable points in terms of pics, some good writing, and lots of stupid writing that can be bulldozed. Will get to more of it later. Most of that General this and military that can probably be huffed, leaving a good template. Aleister 23:50 Festivus MMX p.s. See comment below This is soo... Boring... --Magic Snow man ☃ 16:53, December 24, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Article written in the style of its subject. Simsilikesims 20:18, December 27, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (8)	Does anybody get the joke? If not, kindly send this to hell. --Scofield 16:48, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It's kinda funny I guess... But it still needs to go. --Dancing dude 18:30, December 23, 2010 (UTC) This is not a good reason.--Sycamore (Talk) 20:34, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. The page title convinced the author he was free even from baseline coherence. Articles that "are in the style of the thing they're about" have been welcomed, but it's easy to write a boring article. You've got to have a better gimmick. Spıke ¬ 18:38 23-Dec-10 Delete. The title says it all--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 19:43, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Now that's just random... and it's boring, too. And not like Beige is beige; it's not even a good boring. 1234 ~ 19:57, 23 December 2010 Delete. Just randomly rambles on without much purpose. No one is going to keep with this after the first paragraph. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:15, December 27, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It's, well... tedious. It isn't funny. End of. Myocardialinfarction 21:39, December 27, 2010 (UTC) "...you're supposed to poke fun at something being boring, not write a boring article itself." I agree with Scofield, writing in the style of the subject has its place, but I do not believe this to be that place. → I am greatSoup? 22:07 27-Dec-10 ←
Comments	Some very weak comments regarding why we should delete this.--Sycamore (Talk) 20:34, December 23, 2010 (UTC) And some not so weak. The lack of coherence and applicability to much of anything are rather major issues with this... though if more folks would actually say what the issues are, or why it should go, that would help, yes. But that'd take effort. And effort is boring, or something. *shifty eyes* 1234 ~ 20:44, 23 December 2010 Well, the article accomplished what it was probably setting out to do. That is, my brainless paper shuffling actually looked appealing compared to it. If/when I actually finish reading it, I'll cast a vote. → I am greatSoup? 22:17 23-Dec-10 ← I'll trade you brainless paper shufflings... the article actually was more appealing than mine. 1234 ~ 22:29, 23 December 2010 I dunno, your's sounds scary → I am greatSoup? 22:44 23-Dec-10 ← This page makes pretty much no sense to me; a few minutes into reading it, and I was like.......why is it even here? --Scofield 08:04, December 24, 2010 (UTC) That's because you were bored. And because you nommed this I read the entire thing and now I'm way too bored to continue with this site, and hereby resign my userhood here. Before I go, this article is so boring that it probably earns its place here to represent boring. Someone actually started writing this and others finished it. I moved the wikipedia section to the bottom and changed some photo captions to boringhood. Aleister 10:25 24 12 As far as I know, Uncyclopedia is a parody website. That means that you're supposed to poke fun at something being boring, not write a boring article itself. That way, we wouldn't even need vfd, as you could tag every crappy article as boring. --Scofield 19:07, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Special:PrefixIndex/Game:Do NOT click any links

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No. Not everything on that list. It's a featured and cream of the crap game. Perhaps some of the shit needs to be cleaned away, but I'd say that can be done by reverting to older saves, like Zombiebaron said. And possibly deleting some bits of crap from that list. But no, the game itself should be kept. —LITTLE SHIT-EATING TURD WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [17:38 24 December 2010] :That's what I meant, mon... though he already had at it; there's still a fair bit left of the general huuh? crap... glarble. In other news, apparently it isn't even a game? O_o Now that's just confusing. 1234 ~ 17:52, 24 December 2010 Keep. Its too large to delete the whole thing, and besides, its kind of fun once in awhile. Its been pared down enough now I think. Simsilikesims 20:36, December 27, 2010 (UTC) What's left are the likes of pages that consist of a single external link, among other things... Zombiebaron already moved the game itself and its intended pages out of the game namespace entirely. I'm not even sure why this is still here, since most of that is blatant qvfd material now, not that this was an entirely valid nom to start with. And too large to delete the whole thing? Larger have been deleted before, though apparently some would prefer to use a legendary 'mass delete' thing whuch has evidently been lost to the mists of time, or something. 1234 ~ 23:05, 27 December 2010 I'm sorry if I was unclear on the 24th when I closed this vote and huffed approximately 75% of the pages listed, but this vote has been closed and the two votes above are invalid. I still don't have enough time to huff the remaining pages, but I'll get to it sometime in the next few days. -- The Zombiebaron 08:41, December 28, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (6)	I was trying to QVFD the obviously vandalism ones before it occurred to me that I had no idea what I was doing, which were vandalism, or even if that was what QVFD was for. So... er... I'll dump this here, hope I don't get banned for rolling back the horrible mess I left on QVFD or something, and hide, now. O_o 1234 ~ 06:18, 23 December 2010 Yes -- The Zombiebaron 06:37, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Genocide. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. Delete. Yeah, played through this one earlier, and it is a good way to waste time, but I doubt it'll be missed. It is just a ton of redirects and half-assed wit that wears off pretty quickly, then just starts repeating the same jokes. Plus, there's a lot of pages that apparently don't even link to it at all. → I am greatSoup? 18:23 23-Dec-10 ← Kerkill the whole game. This is the shittiest game on the site. It's always been a pain to keep in order, and we'd be better eradicating its existence entirely. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:56, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Do NOT click any links! is a featured article, and was voted one of the best pages of 2006, so I don't think we can rightly delete the whole game. If this VFD vote is successful, the game should probably just be rolled back to what it looked like on April 6th 2006. -- The Zombiebaron 08:09, December 24, 2010 (UTC) Fine. You're the expert. Delete all not connected to the featured version. Whatever. Also, wanna smoke some crack, ZB? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 08:12, December 24, 2010 (UTC) Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:19, December 27, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	This isn't what VFD is for, either, is it? Crap... I'm so confused. 1234 ~ 06:18, 23 December 2010 If you wanna go through and check which of the subpages have no redeeming value, and then list all of those pages on my talkpage, I will delete them personally. -- The Zombiebaron 06:37, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Man, Zombiebaron, I love you right now... eh. Problem is, I tried. The going through and... that part. Then I got confused. There were folks who were using these, some of these, despite having no links to them, or being created by IPs, or... it was a piece of the culture. And people keep adding. Adding stupid subpages, links, redirects, horrible, tangled mess... I thought the redirect mess from that one vandal on Illogicopedia was bad... oh, gods... 1234 ~ 06:45, 23 December 2010 Yeah, I know, everybody loves me. Any subpages of the game that have no pages linking to them can obviously be deleted on sight. But also if you could just list whatever other pages you don't think belong, I'll take a look at them and make an executive decision concerning their ultimate fate. -- The Zombiebaron 06:53, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Um... most of them. You seriously want that dumped on your talkpage? More than just a wee bit of code, that. 1234 ~ 06:59, 23 December 2010 Good point. Maybe I'll just wait for the outcome of this vote and then do all the work myself... -- The Zombiebaron 07:05, December 23, 2010 (UTC) I kind of like that idea. *shifty eyes* 1234 ~ 07:07, 23 December 2010 All of these pages can be safely huffed, but I don't have enough time right now so somebody else is gonna have to do it. -- The Zombiebaron 20:05, December 24, 2010 (UTC) Ok, all the pages have been huffed. -- The Zombiebaron 03:42, December 29, 2010 (UTC) *claps* Very impressive. You have my gratitude, for what little it is worth. 1234 ~ 03:58, 29 December 2010

Special:PrefixIndex/Game:Do NOT click any links - Vote closed: Mass deletion required

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No. Not everything on that list. It's a featured and cream of the crap game. Perhaps some of the shit needs to be cleaned away, but I'd say that can be done by reverting to older saves, like Zombiebaron said. And possibly deleting some bits of crap from that list. But no, the game itself should be kept. —LITTLE SHIT-EATING TURD WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [17:38 24 December 2010] :That's what I meant, mon... though he already had at it; there's still a fair bit left of the general huuh? crap... glarble. In other news, apparently it isn't even a game? O_o Now that's just confusing. 1234 ~ 17:52, 24 December 2010 Keep. Its too large to delete the whole thing, and besides, its kind of fun once in awhile. Its been pared down enough now I think. Simsilikesims 20:36, December 27, 2010 (UTC) What's left are the likes of pages that consist of a single external link, among other things... Zombiebaron already moved the game itself and its intended pages out of the game namespace entirely. I'm not even sure why this is still here, since most of that is blatant qvfd material now, not that this was an entirely valid nom to start with. And too large to delete the whole thing? Larger have been deleted before, though apparently some would prefer to use a legendary 'mass delete' thing whuch has evidently been lost to the mists of time, or something. 1234 ~ 23:05, 27 December 2010 I'm sorry if I was unclear on the 24th when I closed this vote and huffed approximately 75% of the pages listed, but this vote has been closed and the two votes above are invalid. I still don't have enough time to huff the remaining pages, but I'll get to it sometime in the next few days. -- The Zombiebaron 08:41, December 28, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (6)	I was trying to QVFD the obviously vandalism ones before it occurred to me that I had no idea what I was doing, which were vandalism, or even if that was what QVFD was for. So... er... I'll dump this here, hope I don't get banned for rolling back the horrible mess I left on QVFD or something, and hide, now. O_o 1234 ~ 06:18, 23 December 2010 Yes -- The Zombiebaron 06:37, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Genocide. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. Delete. Yeah, played through this one earlier, and it is a good way to waste time, but I doubt it'll be missed. It is just a ton of redirects and half-assed wit that wears off pretty quickly, then just starts repeating the same jokes. Plus, there's a lot of pages that apparently don't even link to it at all. → I am greatSoup? 18:23 23-Dec-10 ← Kerkill the whole game. This is the shittiest game on the site. It's always been a pain to keep in order, and we'd be better eradicating its existence entirely. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:56, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Do NOT click any links! is a featured article, and was voted one of the best pages of 2006, so I don't think we can rightly delete the whole game. If this VFD vote is successful, the game should probably just be rolled back to what it looked like on April 6th 2006. -- The Zombiebaron 08:09, December 24, 2010 (UTC) Fine. You're the expert. Delete all not connected to the featured version. Whatever. Also, wanna smoke some crack, ZB? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 08:12, December 24, 2010 (UTC) Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:19, December 27, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	This isn't what VFD is for, either, is it? Crap... I'm so confused. 1234 ~ 06:18, 23 December 2010 If you wanna go through and check which of the subpages have no redeeming value, and then list all of those pages on my talkpage, I will delete them personally. -- The Zombiebaron 06:37, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Man, Zombiebaron, I love you right now... eh. Problem is, I tried. The going through and... that part. Then I got confused. There were folks who were using these, some of these, despite having no links to them, or being created by IPs, or... it was a piece of the culture. And people keep adding. Adding stupid subpages, links, redirects, horrible, tangled mess... I thought the redirect mess from that one vandal on Illogicopedia was bad... oh, gods... 1234 ~ 06:45, 23 December 2010 Yeah, I know, everybody loves me. Any subpages of the game that have no pages linking to them can obviously be deleted on sight. But also if you could just list whatever other pages you don't think belong, I'll take a look at them and make an executive decision concerning their ultimate fate. -- The Zombiebaron 06:53, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Um... most of them. You seriously want that dumped on your talkpage? More than just a wee bit of code, that. 1234 ~ 06:59, 23 December 2010 Good point. Maybe I'll just wait for the outcome of this vote and then do all the work myself... -- The Zombiebaron 07:05, December 23, 2010 (UTC) I kind of like that idea. *shifty eyes* 1234 ~ 07:07, 23 December 2010 All of these pages can be safely huffed, but I don't have enough time right now so somebody else is gonna have to do it. -- The Zombiebaron 20:05, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Game:The Textbased game of Randomness and subpages

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete Doesn't even look like a game. --M&M (christmas mood) 13:59, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Poorly implemented and the six pages don't go anywhere... 1234 ~ 15:19, 23 December 2010 strong delete almost by not quite QVFD bad. --Mn-z 16:14, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. This game is flawed in its very concept. Nobody likes playing games where you have to type lengthy URLs. --Scofield 16:53, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Yes -- The Zombiebaron 21:21, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Well, I do actually appreciate the idea that they were striving for, that is, making a text based game that requires input in a similar way to how text based games originally required input. That said, the execution of that idea fell short. → I am greatSoup? 22:20 23-Dec-10 ←
Comments

NIGGER

Score: 6
Keep (2)	Keep. Needed article. This is perfect for Uncyclopedia. If you don't like it, simply change it. Nidkap 18:04, December 26, 2010 (UTC) That would be the author. Spıke ¬ 18:08 26-Dec-10 It sounds like the author would like this article moved back to userspace, which is where it should have stayed. Simsilikesims 20:15, December 27, 2010 (UTC) Keep. With just a few tweaks, this could easily become a parody of racism. I'd suggest a fellow "nigga" edit this, as they have a pretty good idea of how they're stereotyped. --Scofield 10:02, December 27, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (8)	Delete. Self-evident. Stereotypes in the pursuit of comedy is fine, but this article is a simple catalog of stereotypes. Spıke ¬ 18:01 26-Dec-10 Delete. I'd have deleted this immediately were it not more than a week old. There's funny racism and there's plain racism - this is definitely the latter. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 18:06, December 26, 2010 (UTC) For. Showing Youtube video's of Rabbi hanging Christmas baubles off his nose and mocking the day when he and his tribe can nail another Messiah up...--Sycamore (Talk) 18:09, December 26, 2010 (UTC) Damn, you noticed that? We thought we'd got away with it. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 18:13, December 26, 2010 (UTC) Hey, you've seen the filmed Max Mosley parties I've attended. Just to reiterate - It was German themed and things got out of hand that one time, and I took nothing to do with the burial of a body.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:19, December 26, 2010 (UTC) I heard that you masturbate to pictures of Enoch Powell. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 18:21, December 26, 2010 (UTC) Now you can't prove that.../stern face--Sycamore (Talk) 18:22, December 26, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Tired and old. Redirect to Birmingham Niggers. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:16, December 26, 2010 (UTC) weak delete I was going to say keep, but this is poorly done racism. --Mn-z 20:58, December 26, 2010 (UTC) Lynch Good riddance, and a nice redirect to Birmingham should serve the site well. Aleister 21:06 26 12 Just disappointing. 1234 ~ 23:15, 26 December 2010 Delete. Author of this perhaps wants to pop this over to the Stormfront site where this attempt at humour will find find a readier audience. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:08, December 27, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	The premise of "niggers" as aliens has promise, but doesn't deliver. Disappointing. Simsilikesims 20:12, December 27, 2010 (UTC)

Sony

Score: -8
Keep (9)	Fixed Author has a concept, with the Paystation, of mocking greed: Sony selling video devices to hook the user on costly games, down the road. Execution falters with Randumbo, swears, and ranting. It's saveable, but I'm not a gamer--Scofield? Also needs a section about the time Sony DVDs modified PCs to prevent copying and keep the owner from seeing what they had done. Spıke ¬ 10:54 24-Dec-10 Keep, but it needs rewrite. And fast. |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Man on Fire CUN|IC Kill | 14:32, December 24, 2010 (UTC) Keep. What Spike is saying. Also a major subject which we should have.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:37, December 24, 2010 (UTC) Keep. what they said. --Mn-z 15:25, December 24, 2010 (UTC) Recyclewrite. --Magic Snow man ☃ 16:51, December 24, 2010 (UTC) Keep. It has a concept. Spike has a wrench. I'm scared. 1234 ~ 18:01, 24 December 2010 Yup, I redid the intro (Did someone originally think Sony was Korean?) and wrote an overview of Sony's sordid history (new Section 1), and extended Robotics (Section 4), relying on Wikipedia. Deleted Section 5, which tried to tug it toward HayStation instead of PayStation. Sections 2 and 3 (game boxes) need a more knowledgeable editor. Spıke ¬ 18:59 24-Dec-10 updated Keep. Just leave it as it is. DJ Mixerr 18:39, December 24, 2010 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig Looks cool, SPIKE, although everyone knows Sony is run out of the UK → I am greatSoup? 01:08 25-Dec-10 ← Bevanz and I discuss this further on his talk page, but I won't pursue it in the article. Spıke ¬ 23:32 26-Dec-10 Swung my vote like a old west guy swings from a tree. Nice work again Spike, this works very well. Aleister Keystrokes. MMX
Delete (1)	This has been lying around Uncyclopedia for ages now. It's not up to the mark, and I doubt if anybody's been working on it. --Scofield 10:16, December 24, 2010 (UTC) I'll change my vote if anyone argues coherently why this should be saved. It seems pretty bad to me, but who am I to judge, not being Japanese (or maybe I am, and am saying that to suck up to the Chinese). Aleister Made in China by our Chinese overlords 11:31 24 12
Comments	Kept. --ChiefjusticeXBox 08:44, December 27, 2010 (UTC)

Cheltenham

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete because there have been vanity problems in the topic area (example diff) and because the current article just isn't very funny. If deleted, salting should be considered. --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 23:25, December 24, 2010 (UTC) Delete. That an article about a city of 110,000 could lead to links to vanity from area people is not a reason to delete it. The reason to delete it is that this food processor full of crudités is either random or based on local information that is never explained to us. The writing isn't good and there are no pictures. Spıke ¬ 00:25 25-Dec-10 Ye gods, that is ugly. I mean... er, it's lost on the rest of us. Something about how, aye, local information ain't explained, and stuff... and it ain't loved, or something. Nobody loves it. *flails* 1234 ~ 00:54, 25 December 2010 Delete. Weak. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:21, December 26, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

GNOME Localisation

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete because it is too long and factual; it would need a major reworking to satisfy our humor standards. --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 23:25, December 24, 2010 (UTC) Weak delete. Funny; but for a very, very small niche. Jokes told in C language. Compare Lyrithya's KDE on an equally baroque subject: From the first paragraph it takes the humor right to the (common) reader. Spıke ¬ 00:18 25-Dec-10 And whose fault is that, eh? *glares at SPIKE* 1234 ~ No! am saying KDE does it right. This one makes the reader come to it. Spıke ¬ 21:42 25-Dec-10 What reader? 1234 ~ 21:59, 25 December 2010 Anyway, this is just... hideous. I mean, it explains itself well enough, perhaps even better than I would, but it's just... it seems to be a random unfunny list of things united by topic... ish. Not to mention, some of it's just plain wrong. Inaccuracy can be funny, but here it makes it come off... hells, I don't even know. Maybe it's just that it's not common knowledge, anyhow, and it's not ludicrous enough to pull it off, or something. 1234 ~ 00:51, 25 December 2010 Delete. It's just not funny. Nor is it technically accurate, which would be required to make it funny. Are you bothered? Can't say as I am. Myocardialinfarction 15:57, December 26, 2010 (UTC) While on the same side as you in this vote, let me convey the outrage of the entire UnNews staff that you would suggest that factual accuracy is a prerequisite to humor. Spıke ¬ 22:03 26-Dec-10 You mean yourself? *jumps away* I kid, I kid! Don't hurt me. But seriously, the way you lot tend to do news, it tends not to be funny without the basis on which it is, er, based. Hence the whole sources thing, no? So you do need accuracy in that regard to be funny - holding to something real and dismantling it. 1234 ~ 23:24, 26 December 2010 Yes, a good one is based on something--but it need not state that thing accurately. Spıke ¬ 23:29 26-Dec-10 You remind me of zim_ulator sometimes. 1234 ~ 23:51, 26 December 2010 My thinking was that its' route to being funny might be found in satire, which would require the original concept to be portrayed accurately (or at least for the intended audience to know it well enough for it not to matter). It reads like a sort of 'the emperor has no clothes'-category thing, but seems to have been written by someone who isn't entirely sure of the concept of what clothes might constitute. There's certainly some humour in the area, but none really raises its head in this article, and I think a future where someone is bothered enough to write about it properly will not involve this text. I For One Am Far Too Lazy To Even Think About It. For an online humour/humor repository, this is just, well, limp. As much as one can take the piss out of GNOME if one wishes, the effort of the developers deserves better. I certainly did not intend any insult to UnNews. It's even more fair and balanced than Fox. Myocardialinfarction 01:45, December 27, 2010 (UTC) No real offense taken, of course. Spıke ¬ 02:10 27-Dec-10 I sound just like the Viz character 'Mr Logic'. "He is as of neuralgia of the fundament." Anyway, it isn't funny. Let's stop talking about it. Myocardialinfarction 01:50, December 27, 2010 (UTC) We can't--until it goes away. Spıke ¬ 02:10 27-Dec-10
Comments

Game:Life RPG 5 and subpages

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Contradictory, random, unfinished - doesn't go anywhere at all before running out of places to 'explore' on that background that actually managed to give me a headache... ow. 1234 ~ 05:22, 23 December 2010 Yes -- The Zombiebaron 06:33, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. per above. --Mn-z 16:18, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Yup, Lyrithya covered it well. → I am greatSoup? 18:49 23-Dec-10 ← BORING Left me very, very bored. --Scofield 09:58, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Game:Troublemaker and subpages

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Well, I've seen worse, but pointlessness and boringness aside, it is clearly incomplete. What little there is goes nowhere, just ends - person was in the early stages of progress when it stopped and now hasn't been seen in over a year. 1234 ~ 05:22, 23 December 2010 Yes -- The Zombiebaron 06:32, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. stupid shitty unfinished game, so delete. - Another n00b 11:37, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. goes nowhere. --Mn-z 16:23, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Wow. That was worse than I was expecting... Second day just abruptly ends with not just red links, but a prompt as to what you will do next with no options. → I am greatSoup? 18:44 23-Dec-10 ←
Comments

Game:MySpace:The Game

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	It's a myspace... we already have userspace for that, but this is just taking it too far, at least these days... ain't even been used in over a year, too, apparently. 1234 ~ 05:22, 23 December 2010 Yes -- The Zombiebaron 06:32, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Pointless stuff. Not even a game in the true sense. --Scofield 15:08, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I was almost like, we might want to keep this, since it has userpages on it, but this I was like, that is what real userpages are for or something. --Mn-z 16:21, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. What they said → I am greatSoup? 18:39 23-Dec-10 ←
Comments

Santa claws

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Entirely random story with little value, "your mom" jokes, Chuck Norris, George Bush, etc. → I am greatSoup? 19:29 22-Dec-10 ← Yeah, lots of ridiculous, little funny. Fnurdletoot. 1234 ~ 19:51, 22 December 2010 Delete. "Santa Claws is Santa Claus' evil twin father....So too bad." Spıke ¬ 23:03 22-Dec-10 Delete. timestamped from 2007. --Mn-z 01:44, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I detect the work of someone who still believes in the Gospel According to Santa Claus. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:01, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Interesting concept, but poorly written on the whole. There's no coherence after the introduction. --Scofield 09:01, December 23, 2010 (UTC) HA HA! No. --Dancing dude 18:31, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Total Shit--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 19:44, December 23, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Game:A Game and subpages

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete this please. -- The Zombiebaron 08:41, December 22, 2010 (UTC) Eeeh? That's just stupid. Although Zombiebaron should be the one to delete it. Not some VFD regular; that'd ruin everything. 1234 ~ 15:59, 22 December 2010 Delete. KIll it so we can watch it squirm and suffer--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 16:55, December 22, 2010 (UTC) Delete. per above and whatnot. --Mn-z 01:42, December 23, 2010 (UTC) HORRIBLE! --Scofield 09:05, December 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. → I am greatSoup? 18:38 23-Dec-10 ←
Comments

Game:UnQuest and subpages

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. A game that requires the input of a dungeon master. Gert5, the creator and dungeon master hasn't participated in the game in two years, even with several people trying to play. Seems like an alright idea, but without a DM there is little point. → I am greatSoup? 05:23 22-Dec-10 ← Delete! -- The Zombiebaron 08:46, December 22, 2010 (UTC) Eh, innit the stuff like this what goes on, say, a forum? 'Sides, doubly pointless without the operator, anyhow. 1234 ~ 16:01, 22 December 2010 Delete. SHHHHIIIIIIIEEEEETTTTT--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 16:50, December 22, 2010 (UTC) Delete. There are better ways of playing correspondence randumb D&D parodies. And even then, its not a very good idea. --Mn-z 01:41, December 23, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Goemon: Mystical Ninja

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Overly long "article" that consists of what amounts to three huge lists filled with randomness, memes, and links to youtube. → I am greatSoup? 23:15 21-Dec-10 ← Delete No effort, no future? mAttlobster. (hello) 23:29, December 21, 2010 (UTC) Nah I like ninjas. I don't like this article. It pains me to have an article about ninjas destroy. Yet this must be done, but I wont guarentee I'll enjoy the noise. /waits sadly for this articles execution.--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 01:57, December 22, 2010 (UTC) Delete. According to my CrapNav..this is shyte. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:46, December 22, 2010 (UTC) Obliterate. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 12:27, December 22, 2010 (UTC) Not funny, listy, and excessively silly... 1234 ~ 15:42, 22 December 2010
Comments	PINGAS, appropriately, redirects to Penis. Everything that uses PINGAS is a comparable wasteland, including List of Sonic Characters Nobody's Ever Heard Of (there are 27) and Super Friends (there are 13, then 19 others PowerPoint-style), or try Music War of 2010--you guessed it, a Wacky War fought by rock superstars. Spıke ¬ 01:50 22-Dec-10

Jesus was Christian, NOT Jewish

Score: -7
Keep (10)	Keep It's not trolling; it's a joke. It's quite amusing. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:28, December 21, 2010 (UTC) Regardless of the intentions behind it, the delivery is what failed. I know that a lot of people find "religion-ist" jokes funny, however doing the "dead serious parody" of a group of people is hard to pull off. The article reminds me of the brand of humor Stephen Colbert uses on the Colber Report to mock American conservatives, but the failing point here was in the delivery. Overall, even with the help of several established members of the site, the article is still terrible → I am greatSoup? 23:51 21-Dec-10 ← Keep But keep the 30-day template. It's a good start and won't need much to make it keep worthy, the page at least keeps to a theme and it is a joke, not a rant, as far as I can tell, which isn't far. I'll put in a section about Mary Magdelene being Christian and not Jewish for my contribution to the page. Will put on a wetsuit and go in now. Aleister 1:52 22 12 Keep I don't think it is quite where it wants to be but this article does come with illustrations and plods along to a finish. Certainly not a VFH contender but not bad enough as an article to get deleted. I think also the author was troll baiting with the name he used here and got banned but should this also go? Are works by Trolls always deleted when they are unmasked or do it themselves?? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:52, December 22, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Has has some nice additions made in the time, and is amusing in parts.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:24, December 22, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Regardless of original intent, the current version makes me smile. And I think it has enough absurdities even in earlier incarnations ("Jews are a hive-mind" - really?) --UU - natter 11:57, Dec 22 Keep. This should be moved to Why?:Jesus was Christian and not Jewish. --M&M (christmas mood) 12:33, December 22, 2010 (UTC) I like this idea → I am greatSoup? 19:10 22-Dec-10 ← JESUS WAS AGAINST ABORTION AND GAYS! When will you people learn to understand the truth? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:46, 22 December 2010 Keep - Jesus was a Jew? Bah! That's exactly what the Jews want you to believe. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 13:39, Dec. 22, 2010 Keep. Al did a good job on this one. He might be Jewish. ~ 14:43, December 22, 2010 (UTC) Oh. 1234 ~ 15:37, 22 December 2010
Delete (3)	Delete. Its existance is for the sole purpose of trolling, not spreading humor. He even had a quote at the top stating how he had intended to cause offense, which was removed. Looking at the history of the article, you can see that several people have had to force feed the author English in hopes of assisting the delivery. Probably one of the biggest problems with the article is that the author is sending the message that he is going to spell out, to an ignorant audience, exactly why his belief is right, in the most self-admittedly offensive way possible. Finally, this article is entirely unnecessary, and the idea of it could simply be placed inside one of the articles that is already dedicated to Jesus, if it isn't already in one of them. He hasn't touched it in two weeks, after he blanked it due to the fact that Sycamore gave him 30 days to fix it. → I am greatSoup? 23:06 21-Dec-10 ← Delete. I discussed this article with Aleister (archived at User:Aleister in Chains/archive6#Jesus was Christian, NOT Jewish) and proposed bringing the article here for wider debate on 3-Dec. Instead, I took it to the Uncyclopedia:Poopsmith's Lounge where Sycamore gave it its 30-day citation. To repeat my original comment: I cannot tell he's kidding. By he, I mean the author, Christianity Is The One True Faith. Spıke ¬ 23:43 21-Dec-10 I still don't get it. 1234 ~ 23:57, 21 December 2010 Delete. shit. - Another n00b 10:44, December 22, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	If this is violating the Template:Fix, then I will be fine holding off until January to re-nominate it. However, considering his immediate reaction to having the template added onto the article, I do not see it as plausible that this could go anywhere. → I am greatSoup? 23:06 21-Dec-10 ← His comment when he blanked the page: "now your precious site is fixed, like a retarded dog - hopefully it will stay dead." → I am greatSoup? 23:12 21-Dec-10 ← I have to say that Jesus was Jewish, but only by race and not by religion.--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 01:58, December 22, 2010 (UTC) This is hardly the place to be spouting an opinion on unproven things as though it were fact. Overall, I think that the way Aleister wrote that section is a lot better. However, even if the entire thing were rewritten into an overall better article, I don't feel it deserves its own article. → I am greatSoup? 02:18 22-Dec-10 ← I see it more as attempt to poke fun at Christians and Christian organisations who have heavily downplayed the Jewish background in the Jesus story. The New Testament works by St.Paul and the gospel of St.John certainly show this bias. Like anyone who has belonged to an organisation/religion and then leaves it, ex-members tend to be the bitterest about their experiences. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:56, December 22, 2010 (UTC) Sorry, the first sentence of my last comment was actually a response to Iwillkillyou333's comment. I agree with your points, and I think Aleister's work so far has done a lot to bring out the actual joke of the article. Previously, it was just trolling. Even with his changes, and though the vote will probably fail, I am going to leave as a Delete vote, because I still stand by the fact that it is not necessary, and I still don't particularly see the humor in it. → I am greatSoup? 08:12 22-Dec-10 ← I'm not saying this article's amazing, but it's clearly a joke. mAttlobster. (hello) 09:22, December 22, 2010 (UTC) Jesus was a nice Jewish boy from a good Jewish family who had some strange ideas. Anyone claiming otherwise will be banned. ~ 12:47, December 22, 2010 (UTC) Mordillo, you're wrong. He was no more Jewish than this fish is! Wait, is this fish Jewish? Er... wait... I think I killed it. Was it, though? 1234 ~ 15:37, 22 December 2010 Comment. Ahem, Jesus was obviously Sumerian as he praised the demiurge known as Marduk who took the guise of Yahweh to trick the Hebrews into worshipping him. That is all. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 16:04, December 22, 2010 (UTC)  No. Jesus was from the Aztec Empire because what demigod wouldn't want human sacrafices every weekend. → I am greatSoup? 19:10 22-Dec-10 ← No, his mother was a fish. I'm certain of it. 1234 ~ 19:41, 22 December 2010 Kept --ChiefjusticeXBox 06:22, December 23, 2010 (UTC)

Santa Banta

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Maybe I'm missing something, but this just keeps rambling and rambling and rambling about nothing. → I am greatSoup? 22:12 21-Dec-10 ← Delete. Quotes are used to bicker with one another, and intro tells us this is another fantasy character that author is going to--yes, ramble--about with gibberish, swears, and jousts at the reader. Sorry, I didn't get past the intro. Spıke ¬ 22:25 21-Dec-10 Went back to read past the intro--("Okie dokie. Air you go")--and I add superficial racial and/or individual ridicule with no link to comedy or to any theme. Spıke ¬ 23:02 21-Dec-10 Well, it's definitely about something... I just cannot fathom why. Mostly because it fails to get its whatever across. 1234 ~ 22:58, 21 December 2010 Delete. A toilet whack job by the author who has forgotten to tell the rest of the world what he is on about. When I first saw the title, I thought it was Santa Banter..i.e. Father Christmas verbally joshing with his elves. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:03, December 22, 2010 (UTC) CRAP as well as SHIT This is funny how? Also, merry christmas--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 16:52, December 22, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Invalid vote, no VFD tag. ~ 23:41, December 22, 2010 (UTC) Ah, damn, I could swear I put a VFD tag on it, but clearly not. Is forgetting to put the tag on a case where it cannot be renom'd for a month? Or can I put the tag on the article and renominate it? → I am greatSoup? 00:01 23-Dec-10 ←

IDK

Score: -3
Keep (4)	Keep. I think as it stands, it is a fairly good parody and sticks to the story. → I am greatSoup? 19:16 21-Dec-10 ← Keep. Looky! Oscar Wilde has a quote that is not only actually funny but a conundrum! I rearranged, respelled, and made it use complete sentences; also added 1 case where IDK is not just the question but the answer. Spıke ¬ 20:11 21-Dec-10 Huh, perhaps this does have hope. 1234 ~ 20:20, 21 December 2010 Keep. IDK why.--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 16:53, December 22, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. Idiocy similar to BRB. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:56, December 21, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	I started removing the lists and rearranged a whole sentence before deciding I was too lazy to try to fix this up. I think it might have more of a workable idea than the last, but my intense laziness prevents me from saying anything for sure. 1234 ~ 16:21, 21 December 2010 I rewrote several paragraphs to hopefully keep more consistancy, shuffled a few sentences, and got rid of any red links that were there before. → I am greatSoup? 19:36 21-Dec-10 ← Kept ~ 23:42, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

Cliché

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	Delete. If someone wants to write an entire article from scratch with nothing to go off of then I'll change my vote, but until then my Delete stands. Loopygrumpkins 23:49, December 21, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	This should be QVFD'd → I am greatSoup? 23:52 21-Dec-10 ← Nevermind, it is already on QVFD, doesn't need to be here, too. → I am greatSoup? 23:53 21-Dec-10 ← Aye, take things like this under a week old to QVFD in the future, mon. Although if anything quite this short managed to survive to VFD age, I'd be scared. 1234 ~ 23:56, 21 December 2010 A one-liner from I.P.Anon? Yup, QVFD. Spıke ¬ 00:10 22-Dec-10 CRAP. Just get rid of it, please. --Scofield 14:04, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

UnNews:Don't ask, don't tell policy repealed

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	Delete. First four paragraphs are almost completely advocacy, celebrating the U.S. Senate vote with phrases like "historic," "swept the world by storm," "fell out of favor," "comes as no surprise," and of course, "homophobe." Article is not saved by the subsequent trite "He's gay"/"He's not gay" jokes. UnNews is for 19-Dec; a rewrite request to the author the next day had no effect. Spıke ¬ 21:14 21-Dec-10
Comments	Invalid Nom while I want give the Huffington Post back their editorial as much as anyone, I'm afraid this nomination is invalid since it the article is not yet 7 days old. I would talk to some admin about educating the author of the difference between bias and humor. I would suggest Zim_ulator, but he is not active at the moment. --Mn-z 21:49, December 21, 2010 (UTC) The problem is, VFD doesn't really apply to UnNews - the stuff it quick to write and quick to pass by. By the time a week is up, most of it will have already passed into archives, forgotten. The question is, what does apply, or what measures ought to be taken with it when it does indeed prove rubbish? 1234 ~ 22:08, 21 December 2010 Articles that are clearly duds, such as headlines taken from the "Minitrue" suggestion list by an Anon who can't even replace the Indian Head, I take to QVFD. Articles like this one--if I were surer that my impression of it is objective--we "mercy move" to the author's space for rework. I will do so with this one if several more people, despite the technical invalidity, confirm my impression of the article. Spıke ¬ 22:14 21-Dec-10 Eh, the first paragraph seems decent, but then it loses all newsiness... aye, advocacy. Silly, silly. 1234 ~ 22:22, 21 December 2010 I can sorta see how the author is trying to make fun of both sides, sorta. However, it comes across basically as liberal rank followed by of footnote of "buttsecks, LOL!!!!!", as spike said. --Mn-z 22:41, December 21, 2010 (UTC) Closed. Based on the discussion above, I have mercy-moved it to User:Scofield/UnNews:Don't ask, don't tell policy repealed for possible rework. Spıke ¬ 13:46 22-Dec-10

ESAD

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. and more. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 16:01, December 21, 2010 (UTC) Eeeh? 1234 ~ 19:19, 21 December 2010 Delete. Random nonsense followed by bad formatting, grammar, and sentence structure. Ends with refering to a specific multiplayer map of a specific game as though everyone should know exactly what they are talking about and the old Leeroy Jenkins meme. → I am greatSoup? 19:20 21-Dec-10 ← Barry the octopus was drinking absinthe one day when Chuck Norris and Jesus starting having ghay secks. Lolcats @ me. Nominally Humane! some time Tuesday, 20:07, Dec 21 2010 UTC What does it mean? Wikipedia tells me it's in an appendix of Internet slang. But it isn't. Spıke ¬ 21:17 21-Dec-10 In terms of Internet slang, it means "Eat shit and die" → I am greatSoup? 21:24 21-Dec-10 ← Explains why it isn't there; thanks. Spıke ¬ 21:34 21-Dec-10 Delete. Crap sticks. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:06, December 22, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Game:A+ Computer Questnician and subpages

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	What the fuck is this. -- The Zombiebaron 09:13, December 21, 2010 (UTC) UN:CM. Speaking of which, who the hell is Codeine? Can we ban him for UN:CM? Nominally Humane! some time Tuesday, 12:45, Dec 21 2010 UTC That's a big neg-o-tive Ghost Rider --—John Lydon 14:58, December 21, 2010 (UTC) Eh, not funny or good. Or done. Or apt to get done. 1234 ~ 15:49, 21 December 2010  Destroy. The main test is incomplete, everything else takes you through stuff that is riddled with memes and fairly obvious vanity on the author's part. Furthermore, it has clearly been abandoned, not having been touched in two years. → I am greatSoup? 19:04 21-Dec-10 ←
Comments

Proton

Score: -11
Keep (11)	Keep. Good stub. Being such a passionate science wizz you could re-rewrite it?--Sycamore (Talk) 16:50, December 20, 2010 (UTC) Fixed. I was preparing to vote Delete on the grounds that there is nothing in real life to make an Uncyclopedia article on the proton any different from the ones on the neutron and electron, and all should be redirected to a good article on atomic structure. Then I read it; the article has all the humor that such an article can have: not excellent humor; mostly just puns on the use of "pro"--but it does play on all that we know about the proton: that it has a positive charge. I gave it a copy edit and stole an illustration from Wikipedia. It impressed me more the closer I read it. That said, Sycamore, it usually falls to those of us voting Keep to make an article on VFD keepable. Spıke ¬ 17:05 20-Dec-10 I was unsure on this article before, but it looks a lot better now, SPIKE. → I am greatSoup? 21:47 20-Dec-10 ← Fucking Keep Not bad enough--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 21:56, December 20, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Quirky and inspired me enough to add some extra ideas. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:06, December 20, 2010 (UTC) From which he has now worked magic on the formerly VFD-ready Neutron. Spıke ¬ 23:44 20-Dec-10 Keep. - We can't delete a fundamental particle from existence! THINK OF THE CONSEQUENCES!! -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 02:00, Dec. 21, 2010 Squid. 1234 ~ 02:14, 21 December 2010 Keep, but on condition that it moves to a new page, and this page become a disambiguation. Seriously, there's a Proton car! |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Man on Fire CUN|IC Kill | 07:57, December 21, 2010 (UTC) Keep. What Kippy said. --Scofield 08:48, December 21, 2010 (UTC) bandwagon keep because I vote that way. --Mn-z 21:50, December 21, 2010 (UTC) Keep I felt left out. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:32, December 21, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (0)	Delete. As a science student who had chemistry as his class XII subject, I am very, very offended by the randomness of this piece of shit. Someone ought to do a check on the category of elementary particles. --Scofield 16:43, December 20, 2010 (UTC) I took chemistry too. So, nyah, nyah! Spıke ¬ 17:24 20-Dec-10
Comments	Kept -- The Zombiebaron 08:22, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

The Tiny War

Score: -4
Keep (4)	Seems entirely made up, but I like it. It's random, but it also has a central topic that it sticks to... it's cute. 1234 ~ 01:45, 20 December 2010 Keep. Per Lyrithya, who says it all and then repeats it during those three dot things (but out of range so we can't hear it). I did minor clean up edits, and got rid of George Bush's name, seen enough of that, thank you. Aleister 11:40 20 12 Keep. Is a little better than a random stub about a nonexistent war written by people who don't know anything about a war; this one has a clever map (ah, for the days of Beany and Cecil, in which every episode did!) and brushes against the topics of the inability to plan a battle, the tendency to fight a war because of a set of issues that are completely different (I shot the sheriff, but I did not shoot the deputy), and fixation on minor issues (the pig) that is in no one's interest. All it lacks is to change the combatants to make fun of a real-world war about which those things were true. Please add it to one of our War templates, or no one will ever stumble on this again. Spıke ¬ 15:09 20-Dec-10 Keep. I think it is a funny little article, and led me to look up the real Inaccessible Island, which is a cool little place. As Lyrithya stated, it does a good job sticking to the topic. I think the article talks about pigs so much because of the fact that several places on the real island are called "Pig". → I am greatSoup? 20:48 20-Dec-10 ←
Delete ()	Delete. Is there really such a thing?--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 00:30, December 20, 2010 (UTC) Nevermind--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 21:59, December 20, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Side note to Iwillkillyou333: No, the war isn't a real thing, the island is an uninhabited nature reserve, which belongs to the United Kingdom. The only purposes to the island seems to be guano and eggs, harvested by a nearby island, and for scientific studies. → I am greatSoup? 20:48 20-Dec-10 ← Kept -- The Zombiebaron 08:19, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

BRB

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Keep. I honestly have no explanation why I'm voting keep other than it made me laugh. --—John Lydon 15:04, December 21, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Bring Ribs Bitch! -- The Zombiebaron 06:27, December 21, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Get over it writer and find a girlfriend. Meanwhile, whilst you're out, I think this can be quietly deleted. You'll only be embarrassed later. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:45, December 21, 2010 (UTC) Being really bitchy. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:47, December 21, 2010 (UTC) Meh, not funny to enough sorts. And rather stupid to boot. 1234 ~ 15:49, 21 December 2010 "Bums Raping Babes." Really? → I am greatSoup? 19:09 21-Dec-10 ←
Comments	Boring Retarded Blurb. But click on a few pages from {{Internet-Speak}} (at the bottom of this page). This section--especially the pages on Internet abbreviations--is uniformly crappy rants by chat nerds. It fits right in. Spıke ¬ 12:01 21-Dec-10 That's no excuse... kill them all, then! 1234 ~ 14:44, 21 December 2010