Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Virgin Shark gives birth to Aquatic Messiah

Article: UnNews:Virgin Shark gives birth to Aquatic Messiah	Score: 13 Hydrocephalic Angels on the head of a pin
Nominated by:	This is an excellent example of an evil UnNews article, and therefore worthy of nomination Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 21:52, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
For: 19	Mostly, because it makes fun of Christianity. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 21:52, 18 January 2008 (UTC) "Those foolish scientists are so blinded" - now that is good comedy -- Kaizer the Bjorn takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 02:13, 19 January 2008 (UTC) Weak for, just 'cause it's awfully short. Still, I think it's FA-able. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:20, Jan 19 Weakish, but still Forish, For - UnIdiot \| Talk? \| Theme - 14:16, Jan 19 For - That one picture just does it to me. Humourly. -- The Zombiebaron 19:59, 19 January 2008 (UTC) For. --Sir Xiao Li CUN VFH NS (Talk)^{[citation needed]} 02:50, 20 January 2008 (UTC) For --*Sir* Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 14:47, Jan. 20, 2008 Fo --THE 14:55, 20 January 2008 (UTC) For Go Kip!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:34, 20 January 2008 (UTC) For. Awesome pictures, especially for such a small article. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 18:56, 20 January 2008 (UTC) For, though she wasn't a virgin when I was done with her. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:07, 20 January 2008 (UTC) for. this one suprised me.--SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC) For This article is sooo much better than Jesus mAttlobster. (hello) 20:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC) For. Weasel 3689 For. This article might get even more popular than Jesus. (But not as popular as The Beatles!)-->:( 21:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC) For. Behold, the King of the Jaws! - classic Sir DJ ~ Irreverent For. --MNM5150 21:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC) For.--Moneke 11:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC) Meh. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex ! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEE ING • HP • BFF (@ 01:35 4 Feb, 2008)
Against: 6	Meh It's a noble effort and alright concept. I just think the execution is weak as hell. -RA HB 23:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC) Also meh. It's got steak but no sizzle. I loves the sizzle, I does! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:15, 24 January 2008 (UTC) Meh - I reread it and I don't think it's FA worthy. I agree with MO and RAHB here--Æ 23:42, 26 January 2008 (UTC) Meh per above. --Dexter111344 22:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC) Meh Perfectly good article; not great. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:11, 1 February 2008 (UTC) Meh. Just not enough spark. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:16, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Abs per RAHB, but slightly less. And per MO, as I too love the sizzle. --THINKER 20:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC) Self-abstain - I've changed my mind as well. This article is okay, but not feature worthy. It's not that satirical, instead making easy jokes against religious people. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 01:46, Jan. 29, 2008