Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive173

Sheisse

Keep	Keep. - Note the thing Hype said.../me goes Christian Bale--Sycamore (Talk) 17:11, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Weak Keep per above. --Mnb'z 17:46, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Strong Keep per above. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 19:44, 12 February 2009 (UTC) My favorite word in German. ~ 22:05, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Keep MrN 18:32, Feb 21
Delete	Delete. Uh? Not that much to it, when you read it. Gets random, is dull, is lonely and un-linked-to and won't be missed. and it's shite. --UU - natter 11:16, Feb 12 shite. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Like title, like article. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 16:14, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Weak delete. Arguably fixable, but I'm not too interested in seeing it fixed. pillow talk 16:17, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 23:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Unless it can be reused on another garden.--Romartus 22:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	If deleted, consider redirect to Feces, which is the same place Shit points. --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 00:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Kept It's been stinking up the page long enough... MrN 18:32, Feb 21

Combat Arms (video game)

Keep
Delete	Delete. Random gamecruft, un-linked-to, unfunny, the usual bollocks about Haxz0rs and the like. Not getting any better, might as well go. --UU - natter 11:42, Feb 20 delete --Mnb'z 15:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC) ugh delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. –—Hv (talk) 21/02 11:20 Delete. MrN 12:26, Feb 21
Comments

Template:DB

Keep	What? It's cute! ~ 22:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Keep.. IronLung 18:19, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Doesn't bother me. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 21:18, Feb 16 Move to Gert5's userspace! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:34, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. Always liked this one. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 14:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete another wannabe maintenance templates. This one is more of an insult or "the author doesn't want to fix this" templates. --Mnb'z 19:49, 13 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 06:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. MrN 06:14, Feb 14
Comments	Leaning toward userfication, but suggest moving to a more descriptive title (to prevent confusion with "delete because...") --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 04:07, 17 February 2009 (UTC) How about we userspace it as a compromise? --Mnb'z 05:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Kept MrN 11:22, Feb 21

Template:Oogle

Keep	Weak keep. Are you sure, Mnbvcxz? I found it here. This template is only really used in userspace anyway, and is basically harmless. --UU - natter 10:13, Feb 12 Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:12, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Keep cuz im like that--Non00bs22 05:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:37, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete I believe we deleted the main Oogle page recently on VFD. --Mnb'z 06:15, 12 February 2009 (UTC) delete. be 'carful', this is pointless. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 16:13, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. This template is retarded. Transclude it onto the appropriate user pages and send it on its way. pillow talk 16:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 00:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Oogle "Company" was deleted Jan 8th or so of this year. The reason we delete this kind of templates is to prevent from being spammed all of the place. --Mnb'z 17:38, 12 February 2009 (UTC) What imbecile would spam this template all over the place? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:39, 17 February 2009 (UTC) An ip maybe. --Mnb'z 19:03, 17 February 2009 (UTC) IPs can be banned and their edits can be reverted. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 14:19, 18 February 2009 (UTC) That takes work. Seriously, should this be on more than one page? (And I'm questioning that one.) --Mnb'z 05:33, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Kept MrN 11:20, Feb 21

Template:Falwell

Keep
Delete	Delete semiunused, and ugly. Delete this, as "approves" templates set a bad example and run the risk of being spammed everywhere. --Mnb'z 05:44, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter 11:39, Feb 20 Delete. Yuck. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:40, 20 February 2009 (UTC) delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:46, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Hitler Has Only Got One Ball

Keep	Keep it probably needs some rework, but we shouldn't be biased against funny but true things. --Mnb'z 05:37, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. Sometimes WP sporks are the basis for decent articles - this could be worked on to decent effect. I recommend a quick prune of redlinks and so forth that came over from WP, then the addition of a rewrite tag. --UU - natter 11:35, Feb 20 Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:37, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Keep after reading what UU just said. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:39, 20 February 2009 (UTC) keep, tag rewrite. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:46, 20 February 2009 (UTC) They had me at "One ball"... Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 19:05, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. Directly copied from the Wikipedia entry:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler_Has_Got_Only_One_Ball. If i'm correct, facts are punishable by an extremely painful death, correct?Saberwolf116 05:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC) *Delete. Or major rewrite, it's a direct spork as Saberwolf says. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:36, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Kept MrN 11:18, Feb 21

Template:Neutral

Keep	Keep. I made it better. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:29, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Ix-nay. I'm not really sure what this is even supposed to be, or why it's still here. —Sir SysRq (talk) 03:03, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. If it's not used, and there's a more popular template that fulfills the only use we could have for it, then why keep it? --UU - natter 09:34, Feb 18 Delete.MrN 13:07, Feb 18 delete. redundant redundnacy. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:18, 18 February 2009 (UTC) delete no one cares about it, redundant. --Mnb'z 17:25, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Delete and Redirect Redirect this to Template:Abstain It would make a valid option to use. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 06:49, 19 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 14:32, 19 February 2009 (UTC) Comment. Delete. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 01:37, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	It looks like its a vote template like {{for}}, {{keep}}, {{against}}. I'd lean toward keep, but its only on one page and its almost 3 years old, so its probably clutter. --Mnb'z 05:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Abstain I am guessing it's a failed attempt at the Abstain template. It has 3 lines with a Userlink in the middle so If I used {{Neutral|Neutral|Sawblade5|I don't know why does this exist.}} It would show as: Neutral, But the fact is that there's no default message for it and no note on the template page for what it is for and what the purpose is. I have placed a note on the Template Author's page to see WTF it is for. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 05:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC) the author has been gone for a year. --Mnb'z 05:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Neutral. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Deleted and redirected MrN 11:17, Feb 21

Cpotty

Keep
Delete	Delete. Fuckawful random thing. Plus eyerape warning on the second picture - can we delete Image:Sexy2.jpg as well please? --UU - natter 11:30, Feb 20 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:35, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Delete the article and the image. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:42, 20 February 2009 (UTC) delete --Mnb'z 15:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC) delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:47, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Fix Buffalo Bill

Keep	Keep Insulting? I think it's funny. GUYS! "our maintenance tags need consistency"... Why? Let's be funny. To do that we need lots of different jokes. Who wants to see the same template on every page? Maybe you don't like this particular one, but as a general idea I think having different templates is a very good thing. Let's delete the ones which are not funny, not try to make Uncyc consistent --MrN 21:40, Feb 12 I wouldn't necessarily mind there being a single {{fix}} template that did a "choose" thing between a number of other templates, all of which were held to certain standards (categorized the page appropriately, etc). But this slapshot approach to "This article sucks; fuck it" templates is no good at all. No... no good. pillow talk 22:09, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. ~ 23:55, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. another insulting &/or confusing wannabe rewrite tag. --Mnb'z 19:24, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Yes, our maintenance tags need consistency, obviously. pillow talk 20:33, 12 February 2009 (UTC) HA! Oh, man! What a riot! -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:26, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete.. What does this even mean? IronLung 18:20, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. I agree with MrN, variety is indeed important. But this templates is ..so.. bad. --kit 17:41, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Agree with Hyperbole. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 14:15, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	I'm not against multiple fix/rewrite templates. However, I think this one is a bit confusing. The purpose of maintenance tags is to tell the reader to fix the article as gracefully as possible. I would change my vote to abstain if this was turned into a proper maintenance tag and got a healthy dose of clarity. --Mnb'z 05:55, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Englisherror

Keep
Delete	Delete rouge "fix this" template. I do believe we have an actual proofreading service. --Mnb'z 05:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 14:34, 19 February 2009 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:50, 19 February 2009 (UTC) Delete.MrN 23:54, Feb 19 Delete. Replace this anywhere it is used with {{proofread}} - that would be a lot more useful. This is pointless, and as such I'm happy to see the back of it. --UU - natter 11:33, Feb 20 delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:44, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Theories of Existence

Keep	Weak keep. I dunno, I kind of liked one or two of the ideas, including the second table. Needs work - perhaps a rewrite or expand tag? --UU - natter 09:29, Feb 18 Keep. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:43, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. I agree with UU on this one. Its obviously incomplete but not that bad. Maybe send to be colonized? --kit 17:48, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Keep --Mnb'z 05:52, 19 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 14:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC) Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:34, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete Short, pictureless, and not too funny. No major contributions in over a year.~SirTagstit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 01:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Hey mang if you're gonna edit conflict me at least get the nomination correct >:| -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:50, 18 February 2009 (UTC) keep'd - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 15:53, Feb 20

Clag

Keep
Delete	Delete. Unfunny and childish article about glue. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 14:11, 19 February 2009 (UTC) Delete --Mnb'z 16:19, 19 February 2009 (UTC) Del-ete It's effect to Uncyclopedia "was similar to that of Playdough and napalm". --kit 18:33, 19 February 2009 (UTC) Delete Hey look, I'm voting and stuff! -OptyC Sucks! CUN23:46, 19 Feb EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:50, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Chicken soup of death

Keep
Delete	Delete. I found it unfunny and weird. pillow talk 02:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Odd and not good. --UU - natter 09:28, Feb 18 delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. This article should be about guilt-based parenting......hmmmmmmmmm......--    17:26, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 14:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:50, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Came across this when going through the expired Fixes, unsure how to proceed, so I'll bring it here for a consensus. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Nosferatu

Keep
Delete	Delete wannabe stub template. --Mnb'z 05:52, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Delete for the sake of distraughted [sic] vampires everywhere. TPLN 07:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. We have plenty of betterer ones. --UU - natter 09:35, Feb 18 EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 14:18, 18 February 2009 (UTC) delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:48, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Delete Nah nah nah nah......nah nah nah nah.....--    17:22, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Lorem Ipsumdolor

Keep
Delete	Ix-nay. We already have something like this. —Sir SysRq (talk) 02:29, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Actually, it's not really like this, but it is unfunny and kinda pointless. --UU - natter 09:32, Feb 18 EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:39, 18 February 2009 (UTC) delete. not worth expanding. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Wha?. --    17:25, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Flush it. down the drain. --kit 17:52, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Came across this when going through the expired Expands, unsure how to proceed, so I'll bring it here for a consensus. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:18, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:EnglandFA

Keep
Delete	Link rotted doesn't look savable. --Mnb'z 19:02, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Delete MrN 19:11, Feb 17 yech. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:21, 17 February 2009 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:35, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Almost all redlinks, and of the two blue links, one already has a much better template. Get rid. --UU - natter 09:25, Feb 18
Comments

Template:Marxist theory

Keep	De-redlinked, it's not crap. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 11:24, 17 February 2009 (UTC) keep. huh, it's good now. this modus fellow is highly useful. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:42, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Keep per above. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:08, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. ~ 15:31, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Keep looked better cleaned up then I thought it would. --Mnb'z 16:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. Works and stuff. --UU - natter 13:37, Feb 18
Delete	Delete heavily link rotted. And, I don't like sectional "right side" templates. Although, if someone wants clear out the red links, and turn it into a "bottom of the article" template, I'd change my vote keep. --Mnb'z 19:11, 16 February 2009 (UTC) ah my eyes. so many redlinks. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Heh, it's red like communism. But seriously, delete. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 21:16, Feb 16
Comments	Where is the actual article ?--Romartus 22:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC) It's not an article. It's a template. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 11:24, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Could somebody fix the {{Tnavbar}} template, it adds an unnecessary "". -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:41, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Keept -RAHB 05:37, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Artemis Fowl

Keep
Delete	Delete. This page is a masterwork of random, garbled nonsense that has nothing to do with its subject matter, memes both Uncyclopediaesque and otherwise, and repeated mentions of George W. Bush, kitten huffing, and Chuck Norris, coupled with tired, overused, pointless pictures whose captions try to associate them with the subject of the article but fail. It's overlong, listy, unfunny, and generally a steaming pile of shit. Perhaps most importantly, at least one troll and vandal has staked it out as his personal toilet, causing edit wars, forcing its protection, and wasting a good deal of Sycamore's time. I suggest we rid ourselves of it. pillow talk 21:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC) delete. from the drama on the talk page: "The obscene amount of categories, quotes and templates were what made it so funny." once again, delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:23, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Gaaaaaaaaaah! Fucking Delete it before it rapes any more eyes.--    22:27, 17 February 2009 (UTC) delete. MrN 22:37, Feb 17 Delete. I didn't even read it. =] —Sir SysRq (talk) 02:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Serbia

Keep
Delete	Link rotted or more like, never had any links to begin with. When I first saw it, I was going to reformat this. However, it only links to Serbia, Yugoslavia and Oscar Wilde. And, it would only belong on the Serbia page. --Mnb'z 06:00, 17 February 2009 (UTC) delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:20, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Buh-Bye.--    17:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

So Fine

Keep
Delete	Delete The author set up him own wiki as I remember. I'm not a fan of this one... MrN 00:05, Feb 17 Delete --Mnb'z 05:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC) delete. remington steelers cruft. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:19, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Buh-Bye-Now.--    17:45, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Not Fine. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:45, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Pointless template

Keep	What exactly is a "bad example" about this? This is funny, this is nonsense. Funny nonsense is not always bad, and in many ways this is what we are about. Not all of our articles needs to be squeaky clean and with dry humor to mirror wikipedia. ~ 08:40, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Keep MrN 09:53, Feb 16 keeping it moist--Sycamore (Talk) 10:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC) keep. i got a chuckle out of this, only we need to have some sort of discussion so the link in the template will not be red. see you there! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:29, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Not that bad. Keep.. IronLung 18:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Absolutely keep. It's a parody of all those wikipedia 'remove this section because I'm too timid/lazy to do so' templates, and it made me laugh out loud. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 21:18, Feb 16 Keep However, this vote might ought to be removed, depending on if it actually says anything at all about anything other than itself. --TPLN 18:07, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete clutter for the sake of clutter. These templates set a bad example, and this one is particularly unfunny. --Mnb'z 04:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC) -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 06:12, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:12, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Litterbox

Keep
Delete	Delete. I'm not 100% sure on this nom, what withe the Uncyc: namespace and all, but I've just spent the last half an hour trying to work out what the point of this is... and failed miserably. It seems to be like the sandbox, but we have the sandbox for that. Hasn't been edited since 2006, so it obviously didn't catch on, whatever its purpose. –—Hv (talk) 14/02 19:48 Delete. MrN 13:31, Feb 15 delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:31, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Banish it to the wilderness - if there is another wiki further down the evolutionary ladder besides this one. --Romartus 22:40, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain it looks like an intentionally bad page. --Mnb'z 20:15, 14 February 2009 (UTC) This has some historical value. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:19, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Twilight (book)

Keep	Keep. It definitely has some better version in its history... somewhere... -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Keep and let someone try and save it. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 14:10, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Keep per above. --Mnb'z 17:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Conditional K33P If someone can make a decent version of this article and then get a sysop to protect it, it'll be fine. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 20:22, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. Due to the subject being contemporary, it'll just keep on being recreated and chances are further versions will be just as bad. So we may as well keep this one and see if it improves any once the ten-year-olds are more interested in High School Reunuion 14 or whatever it is they'll be into in a few weeks' time. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 16:05, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Keep (Something) MrN 13:35, Feb 15 Keep/Hard Rewrite. Otherwise some IP will re-create an even uglier version of it. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 06:11, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Fucking. Kill. This. Article. —Sir SysRq (talk) 01:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. And CVP. Seriously - it's basically a vandal magnet and not much more than an argument between obsessed fangirls and equally obsessed haters. If there is ever a good version created, it would need watching carefully, but I don't think there's a decent version in the history, they're all pretty similar from what I can see: fancruft. --UU - natter 11:34, Feb 11 Delete. - I like the idea of blocking recreation on this article as UU suggested as well.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:23, 11 February 2009 (UTC) I like to pretend that "Twilight" doesn't exist. Therefore.... -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:05, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Delete and redirect here. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 11:56, Feb 12 delete and cvp. look at all the recent edits! perhaps we could emergency-collaborate on this one...this gives me an idea...SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Conditional delete. If any of the "keep" voters volunteer to watchlist this and keep it free from shitty edits, I'm all for it. pillow talk 16:20, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Down the drain. AS per Hyperbole, someone sticks with it (which I doubt) or down it goes. --kit 09:02, 13 February 2009 (UTC) Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:22, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. If it is crap then let another crappier version appear and see if that is any better. Or someone here will have to read it/watch it to do a better parody. --Romartus 22:45, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	It's had a lot of edits recently. Maybe there is a better version somewhere. MrN 01:52, Feb 11 Could we repurpose this article to be about something other than the novel? Or is there some kind of disambig we could write? --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 17:08, 11 February 2009 (UTC) I think this just needs to be CVPd. I can't think of any way to make this good and worth protecting from fangirls/haters. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:16, 11 February 2009 (UTC) please see discussion of crazy idea here. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC) It seems like this never had {{vfd}} on it - or was this just the result of a botched move? (I am still in support of a rewrite, but I am okay with CVP if this is deleted.) --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 04:05, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Oh really?... Belatedly speedy keep, no VFD template. Also, it's pretty much a draw, so I'd keep it anyway. Lastly, OMG Twilite! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:30, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Stonecutter Approved

Keep
Delete	Delete little used "this is X" template, more obscure and unfunny than average. --Mnb'z 02:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:48, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 06:18, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Subst onto the few user pages it is used on. No need for it to have its own page. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 06:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC) delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Bleah.--    18:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Al Queda

Keep
Delete	Delete We have Al-Qaida and Al-Qaeda. I don't see much potential in this article past it being a bit of a rant. I suggest this be made a redirect. MrN 09:21, Feb 14 Delete+Redirect per MrN9000. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:32, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Delete --Mnb'z 22:02, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Yep. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 06:33, 15 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. And redirect. --UU - natter 09:12, Feb 16
Comments	Redirected to Al-Qaeda. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Dead

Keep
Delete	Delete canned corniness. That is, if you can read it. --Mnb'z 07:18, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 07:31, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Let it die. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:33, 14 February 2009 (UTC) delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:31, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Cooties. --    18:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Irishguy

Keep
Delete	Delete Who? MrN 21:02, Feb 15 Ix-nay. ¿Quien? —Sir SysRq (talk) 21:09, 15 February 2009 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:23, 15 February 2009 (UTC) >:-o -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 01:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC) FAIL I can't decide if this is one person's grudge against a wikipedia mod, or a failed ED article. Either way, Delete!-- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 06:19, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Highlife

Keep
Delete	Delete wannbe rewrite/fix template, or maybe its a "this is X" template. Either way, its a bit insulting, and quite unfunny.--Mnb'z 01:37, 15 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 06:15, 15 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. MrN 13:29, Feb 15 EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:36, 15 February 2009 (UTC) Delete, and let us never talk of it again...mAttlobster. (hello) 21:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Davros

Keep
Delete	delete Useless comment template that I can't really figure what its trying to say. --Mnb'z 20:15, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. I can see some funny potential in this, but there's no need to have it as a mainspace template, unless we're going to have a multitude of Dalek articles. Also, substitute this on Dalek Fred. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:15, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Delete ...huh? Aww hot damn, it's Sofia. Bitch at me here. ;] 23:45, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 06:20, 15 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. MrN 13:30, Feb 15
Comments

Rod Blagojevich

Keep	Keep [1] MrN 18:50, Feb 15 Keep --Mnb'z 19:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC) FUCKING KEEP. I actually laughed out loud just at the intro. The page does a great job of going after this guy in a hilarious, satirical way. If anything, it should be going towards VFH. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 19:11, Feb 15 Keep -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 19:43, 15 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. It was initially a suckfest that I altered to what I felt was save worthy and ready for more work.--    21:05, 15 February 2009 (UTC) Absolute keep. This isn't bad. It's not great, but there's plenty to be salvaged. —Sir SysRq (talk) 21:08, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. Really no point now that he's dissapearred from the face of the Earth.Saberwolf116 18:45, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	kept - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 21:12, Feb 15

Template:GrueEat

Keep
Delete	Delete no this isn't the "main" grue template. It looks like a wanna be maintenance template of some kind, but its one of those that you can't really make out what its trying to say. --Mnb'z 07:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. If I saw this thing at the top of an article, I would immediately stop reading that article. pillow talk 20:25, 13 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 06:12, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. MrN 06:14, Feb 14 This template will be eaten by a grue! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:35, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

TV-Y7

Keep	Keep. I think it's a reasonably solid parody of the ludicrous television content rating system. Gert's pointing out that "TV-Y7" is a little like "PG-13"; normally, you're just going to be watching cartoons, but there's nothing in that content rating that prohibits them from drawing naked boy-ass. pillow talk 16:13, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. It's satire alright. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 16:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:11, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. Mnb'z 17:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC) It can stay. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:37, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. Y'all remember Gert? He left us this oddity. I can make neither head nor tail of it, and it's not linked from anywhere. I doubt it will be missed, and I really don't see the point. Get rid. --UU - natter 11:39, Feb 12 disturbing. also, gert is gone? damn... SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Yah Fuck it All I remember is that my humor made no sense when I was young (which was about 3 months ago) --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 16:06, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Hush, Gert. Your article is kept. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:14, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Sierra

Keep	Weak keep. Sierra games are really pretty hilarious from today's perspective. This article is awful, but I'd rather see a rewrite tag than out-and-out deletion. Incidentally: King's Quest and Lords of the Realm are indeed Sierra games. pillow talk 16:15, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Except Lords of the Realm. :P MrN 20:38, Feb 12 Huh. Guess you're right. They made Lords of the Realm 2, but not Lords of the Realm. pillow talk 20:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. per above. --Mnb'z 19:29, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. I'm going to sort it out a bit... Oh, Leisure Suit Larry... Happy days... MrN 20:27, Feb 12 Keep. If MrN's gonna sort it. I remember Sierra. And I know King's Quest etc are Sierra games. Pretty sure Half Life wasn't, though. I'm old enough to have played many of their games, I just saw nothing in this article, but if it's gonna get fixed then fair enough. --UU - natter 20:34, Feb 12 UU, if you've played the old Sierra "x quest" games, you should absolutely play the Homestarrunner game "Peasant's Quest" if you haven't already. One of the best parodies of a game I've ever seen. pillow talk 20:43, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:27, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. Basically a listy stub about a games company, crediting them with creating games by other companies. Hilarious. Pretty much no edits since 2007, no links, no point. --UU - natter 11:23, Feb 12 delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:02, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 16:17, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:24, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Aimee Mann

Keep	Keep. - Alright stub--Sycamore (Talk) 09:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:02, 12 February 2009 (UTC) This can go. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:09, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Short, unfunny soloartistcruft. --UU - natter 09:55, Feb 12 delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:55, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Seems strange to disagree with Sycamore, but yeah...delete. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 16:08, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Down the drain. As per above --kit 08:56, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. It's unfunny but at the same time inoffensive. I really don't care. pillow talk 16:19, 12 February 2009 (UTC)