Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive131

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.

Famous cricketers

Keep
Delete	Yuck -- The Zombiebaron 20:40, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Duck It's a bouncer of a cricket type joke thing... Unlike this article which is just a load of people saying what they think of particular players, with some random thrown in for no apparent reason. Mr N 20:53, May 11 Delete - I would normally suggest we remove the lists, but that would leave nothing here. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:24, 12 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. The umpire slowly raises his finger of doom and sends this big list o'nothing back to the pavilion etc etc. Unfunny and so forth. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 08:39, May 12 Delete. An ugly, humourless exercise in fail. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:29, 12 May 2008 (UTC) Meh. I just read the thing and it sucks. This is the result of many peoples' opinions on players not really gelling. Having said that, I liked the Bush pic.-- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 13:02, 12 May 2008 (UTC) WTF? - No seriously. It's so stupid it's almost awesome. My first instinct was to move it to Illogicopedia, but Hindleyite's already covering it. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 16:26, May. 12, 2008
Comments	Some of my favourite jokes on the site used to be in this article. Sadly I cannot be bothered weeding out the crap any more. Mostly it's the Asian players that need vetting - maybe us Westerners don't have the same sense of humour. As such, I would like to hear from an Indian/Sri Lankan/Bangladeshi etc. on this matter before it is deleted. In reality though, I can see this being deleted anyway. Meh, I'll transwiki it to Illogic, I think. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 12:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Gerard Way

Keep
Delete	Not want – I put a {{Fix}} on this page awhile back in some weird optimistic fit. Its probably gotten worse since then. And that's pretty hard. Because it was crap before. -- The Zombiebaron 19:14, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Delete No arguments from me (for a change). Although it's not super fan cruft, there is no real point or concept to this article. It's mostly just a load of opinion about the dude, with little attempt at being funny. There are a few links here however, so we could use a decent redirect if it's deleted. Mr N 20:45, May 11 Delete - Crap in most respects. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. I reviewed this a little while back. I tried to give plenty of pointers, but they don't seem to have been followed. It's got the usual bandcrufty stuff throughout, and it's not funny. Redirect to My Chemical Romance. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 08:26, May 12 Meh -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 16:29, May. 12, 2008
Comments

Bogota

Keep
Delete	Delete - Stubby and pathetic. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:04, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Delete - Well, I'm not going to try and save it... Mr N 14:23, May 11 Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 02:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC) Delete - Crap. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:05, 12 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Crap stub. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 08:19, May 12 Delete - Stupid crap. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 16:33, May. 12, 2008
Comments

Fog

Keep	Keep As articles written in a style related to what they are about it kinda like this. The text itself is not really that important, and I actually think this works best as a short stub. Mr N 13:49, May 11 Keep It's cute. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:05, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Keep. Kinda cool. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:54, 11 May 2008 (UTC) keep (awwww) --monika 00:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC) Keep - Sorry to betray you AAA!, but I like it. Probably needs a little expansion. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 16:34, May. 12, 2008
Delete	Delete - Stubby, old, and pathetic. --AAA! (AAAA) 13:42, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Here here -- The Zombiebaron 20:00, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Laws of physics

Keep
Delete	Repeal Try to count how many times this goes against HTBFANJS? --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:30, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Random bollocks. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 10:23, May 11 Delete. Due to the bollocks issue. Mr N 18:28, May 11 Delete - Crap. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:04, 12 May 2008 (UTC) Delete - Newton would be turning in his grave if he were alive to read this. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 16:35, May. 12, 2008 Repeal - Do you mind if I rake my eyes out? Warm Regards, Javascap
Comments

Hermetic

Keep
Delete	Delete This stub has been around long enough... Let's get rid. Mr N 10:58, May 10 Delete. Nonsense. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:29, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. There's possibilities for an interesting article from Hermetic, I suppose, but this odd little article doesn't even notice them and runs head on into nowhere. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 10:21, May 11 Delete - WTF? Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:01, 12 May 2008 (UTC) Delete - Not funny. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 16:36, May. 12, 2008
Comments

Chicken separatists

Keep
Delete	Delete Let's separate this chicken from the rest... Mr N 10:58, May 10 Delete. Odd idea, and I can't find any funny in it. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 10:19, May 11 Delete. Didn't even have the decency to make a coup pun.--Count of Monkey Crisco 23:05, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Delete - WTF? Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:55, 12 May 2008 (UTC) Delete - KFC cuts off their heads, rips off their feathers, dips them in batter, and you want me to say "God bless this meal"? No, no, no, no. Not God bless this meal. God DAMN this meal! -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 16:40, May. 12, 2008
Comments

20th Anniversary

Keep
Delete	Delete Short, not funny stub. Mr N 10:58, May 10 Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:38, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Per MrN. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 10:16, May 11 Delete - Crap. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:51, 12 May 2008 (UTC) Divorce -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 16:43, May. 12, 2008
Comments

Skateboard

Keep	weak keepLiked the knives line.--Count of Monkey Crisco 04:37, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Ix-nay. Stupid. Can't believe this has been here for so long. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex ! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEE ING • HP • BFF @ 00:30 May 10 Delete. -- Mitch 03:25, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Wow Surprisingly poor. I like the idea of writing in the style of a grumpy old man, but this just does not make the cut. Mr N 10:10, May 10 Delete. No good. A blank canvas is a better starting point than this drivel. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 10:14, May 11 Delete - Listy and generally lacking in humour. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:51, 12 May 2008 (UTC) Sex industry? Too much crud. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 13:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments

To

Keep
Delete	Kill - Just read the first paragraph. You'll understand. - UnIdiot \| \| Talk \| Contribs - 23:47, May 9 Delete. -- Mitch 03:25, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. We have worse, but considering the title, I say lets have a go for another one. Mr N 10:04, May 10 Delete. Short & crap = get rid. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 10:10, May 11 Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Bowel Movements

Keep
Delete	Don't know how this survived ICU. --So So 13:23, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Nothing much to see. Not really an article. ----OEJ 15:18, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Oh, For the Love of Mike! Don't forget to put up the VFD template.--Count of Monkey Crisco 20:49, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 03:24, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Oh dear --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 08:48, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Flush. Mr N 09:59, May 10
Comments

Bob Geram

Keep
Delete	Delete. Fails UN:CM. Actually, it just fails. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 09:01, May 9 Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:09, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 03:24, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. If the first Google hit is us, it's not good... Mr N 09:57, May 10
Comments

Bomb (symbol)

Keep
Delete	Delete. Oh noes! Somebody set us up the unfunny stub! Insert other meme here! Get rid! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 09:01, May 9 Delete. Not really much content. ----OEJ 15:19, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 03:23, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Um what --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 08:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Mr N 09:49, May 10
Comments

Charles barkley

Keep
Delete	Delete. Complete and utter drivel. Was ICU'd, but the ICU was removed. Deserves to go. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 09:01, May 9 Personal Foul. Charles Barkley for double drivel. --Count of Monkey Crisco 10:52, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Kind of randumb, kind of cliche, kind of bad. ----OEJ 15:21, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 03:22, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Mr N 09:48, May 10
Comments

Kitten soup

Keep
Delete	I luv list -- The Zombiebaron 01:43, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Only really one recurring joke, which is not really that funny, and does not justify an article. Also, not an article anyway. Mr N 01:48, May 9 Delete. Per both of the above. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 08:40, May 9 Delete. Sigh. Really nice picture of kitten submerged in soup. The article needs so much work it is probably unsalvageable. ----OEJ 15:23, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Weak Delete. Nice picture. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:57, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 03:22, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Delete [[Image:Wiki kittensoup1.jpg]] is the only thing redeemable from el listo --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 09:00, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Lionel Messi

Keep
Delete	Has been irredeemable crap since December 20 2005. Let's just take it out behind the shed already. -- The Zombiebaron 01:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Delete That lasted a while... Mr N 01:35, May 9 Delete. Yeah, random, namedroppy rubbish. What a player though! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 08:39, May 9 Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 21:51, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 03:21, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Vilma Santos

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Random who? --MidwayHaven 07:50, 8 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Notable, I suppose, but this article is kinda random, with lots of 300 references, and no funny. Mind you, that's quite a lengthy gif there. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 08:04, May 8 Delete. Too bad. I really am very much in favor of undermining the dominance of Brit / American point-of-view articles on Uncyc. This one, however, is really quite badly written. ----OEJ 01:38, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Could hack it back, but just not enough in there to be worth keeping. Mr N 01:44, May 9 Delete. -- Mitch 03:20, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Seal Club

Keep
Delete	Delete. - I found this with a VFD template on, but no entry on VFD. I assume someone just forgot to add it. Besides it's crap and mainly a list (Bonner) (Talk) May 7, 08:50 Delete. Short. Listy. One of the lists is a really original and really funny fight club rip-off. Dull. Lame. Pointless. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 08:01, May 8 Delete. Yes, yes it is... Mr N 01:41, May 9 Delete. That was me who put the template on. After I put the template on I got called away to do something pointless and forgot what I was doing when I came back. Sorry. YouFang 18:02, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 03:20, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Vincent Price

Keep
Delete	Cool guy, cool movies, crappy article -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 01:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. So many of the usual suspects: short; name-droppy; random; gay 'jokes' and more. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 07:57, May 8 Mild Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 20:49, 8 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Mr N 23:33, May 8 Delete. -- Mitch 03:20, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Pyroagronecrophila

Keep
Delete	Delete. I don't find it satirical, or funny. Just random. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 23:19, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Random, namedroppy, unfunny, bad idea badly executed and more reasons I can't be bothered to type. Get rid. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 07:55, May 8 Delete. Mr N 23:30, May 8 Delete. Has some concept, but didn't go anywhere with it. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:22, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 03:19, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Delete It was a half decent idea with the possibility of being satirical - the article wasn't --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:01, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Golden Burrito

Keep
Delete	Delete. Its random crap. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 05:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC) El Burrito Dorado Es Muy Mudo. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:43, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Poxy little stub. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 07:58, May 8 Delete. Mr N 01:09, May 9 Delete. Sigh. Just say no to burrito sex. ----OEJ 01:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Amsa

Keep
Delete	Delete. Reads like schoolcruft. Is also schoolcruft. - Don *Leddy the Crunch* (Nyah, see, n y a h !) 21:58, May 8 Delete. Why, yes, so it is! Why is it that people who, presumably, go to school still manage to write such bad prose? ----OEJ 01:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Huffed-On-Sight -- The Zombiebaron 01:35, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

HowTo:Confuse yourself

Keep
Delete	Delete. Lame namedroppy crap. Not even clever randomness. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:35, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. I'm pre-confused. It saves sooo much time. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 15:09, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Yeah, you do wonder for a few seconds if there is a clever, intentional point to this, but no, it just stays crap the whole way through. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 07:54, May 8 Delete. Mr N 23:29, May 8
Comments	Comment. Don't forget your templates. This is the second one I had to add today. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Heihachi

Keep	Surprise Keep Obviously not awesome, but I actually think it is reasonable enough to keep. It's not written as a fans article, and I rather like the style it uses. Also, as one of my fav games for a while, I'm not biased I'm sure... Mr N 14:00, May 6
Delete	TekkencruftThis page deserve to burn in hell. --Dark Paladin X 02:51, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Listy gamecruft. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 09:52, May 6 Dust mAttlobster. (hello) 22:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Weak Delete. The "disabled animal zoo" line almost saved it. Almost.--Count of Monkey Crisco 18:53, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Delete - Doesn't quite make the cut. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments

HowTo:Arson

Keep
Delete	Delete. Pyromaniac >>>>>>>>>> this crap. A WIP that was never finished apparently. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:35, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Ix-nay per TLB. Or rather, TLB's article. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex ! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEE ING • HP • BFF @ 12:17 May 6 Delete. The HowTo namespace is a magnet for mediocrity. I, meanwhile, am a magnet for chunky broads with bad teeth and greasy hair. I've said too much. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 15:07, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. How to "arson"? ARSON is not a verb. It just is NOT! ----OEJ 00:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. I think my favourite thing about this page is the name of its creator - Combat Wombat. The page, however, isn't funny, plus it raised my hackles the same way it did OEJ's. Get rid. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 07:52, May 8
Comments

HowTo:Believe in ALLAH

Keep	Keep Maybe I should stop voting for the day, cos this just looks like a semi reasonable (if a short) article. Not super funny, but puts across one particular view of things in a rather nice style so why not hang onto it... Mr N 14:05, May 6 Keep. Not great or anything, but I don't believe its deletable. Maybe it could be expanded a little bit. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 23:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Keep Horrible, but still... I don't know why... --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC) Weak Keep Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:04, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. Another crappy How To. As the talk page says, "this is supposed to be funny, is it?" --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 10:25, May 6 Delete Fail. A rather terrible attempt. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:30, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Ix-nay. A good effort, but nonetheless terrible. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex ! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEE ING • HP • BFF @ 12:18 May 6 Delete. Slightly over the crap/not crap line. On the crap side. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 14:35, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. In the name of Allah, the most gracious. ~ 08:14, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Democracy

Keep	Keep Too many lines in there which I liked to delete this outright. Can we not have both? Mr N 04:07, May 4 Keep. Meh, I thought it had some redeeming value - certainly enough to justify the rewrite tag that's on it. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 15:51, May 4 Keep - Some good stuff. Just needs a cleanup. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:45, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. Bad, unfunny article. Plus, Procopius just finished a much better alternate, so no need to worry about red links. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 18:52, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Does making it a redirect really count as deleting it? --monika 18:54, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Kerkill and redirect to Democrazy. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:28, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments	I have put {{whoops}} on Democracy and Democrazy in an attempt to "reconcile" the articles; they don't look easily mergeable, but nor is there a consensus for deletion yet. --Pentium5dot1 22:02, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Kept. ~ 08:13, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

HowTo:Headbutt the Pavement

Keep
Delete	Delete now that failed at being funny or satirical... the "HowTo:do really stupid things" idea has been covered nicely here --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Delete Not great. Also, don't forget your VFD tags DJ! Mr N 00:09, May 6 Delete. Bad idea, badly done. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 10:24, May 6 Delete. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 23:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Just removing the worst HowTos --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:48, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Meningitis

Keep
Delete	Delete. Randomly banal, banally random. --Count of Monkey Crisco 08:08, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Bad idea, badly done. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 08:39, May 5 THAT WAS TEH FAIL --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:20, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Mr N 01:29, May 6 Delete. Quite badly written, as Under_user noted. ----OEJ 00:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Radium

Keep
Delete	Delete. This had a VFD tag but never made it to the voting page. It should be here though. --Count of Monkey Crisco 04:35, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. I added that tag. I don't recall why I never put this on VFD - it clearly deserves to be here. Thanks, CMC. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 08:31, May 5 Delete. Nothing worth saving. Mr N 13:19, May 6 Delete. Randomly stupid. ----OEJ 00:26, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Comment.Thank goodness, I was afraid the Randomcruft Illuminati had you assassinated before you could finish the VFD nomination. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:44, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Blendar The Barbarian

Keep
Delete	Will it Blend? There's nothing here. Nuthin'!--Count of Monkey Crisco 04:27, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Bad idea, short, listy, no funny, and not touched since 2006. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 08:27, May 5 Delete the idea was so random and the page was so suck --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Delete - Ok idea, bad in every other way. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Delete As per comments above. ----OEJ 00:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Alex Plank

Keep
Delete	Delete. Well, it's not really an article at all, now is it?--Count of Monkey Crisco 04:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Not really funny either, is it? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 08:22, May 5 Delete It is either funny really not? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:23, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Delete Hell knows how you classify what that was. Delete it, whatever it is. Mr N 13:56, May 6
Comments

The Colbert Report

Keep
Delete	Ix-nay, then redirect it to Stephen Colbert. I see no reason why we should have a page for each. I know they're different things, but the Stephen Colbert article is just so genius in the way that it incorporates the show that I feel no need to have a separate article for it which won't even be consistent with that article. If anyone out there feels like rewriting this garbage, however, be my guest. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex ! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEE ING • HP • BFF @ 01:37 May 6 Redirect. Pretty much per SysRq. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 10:01, May 6
Comments	Direct -- The Zombiebaron 13:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

HowTo:be an idiot

Keep
Delete	Delete Lame and has been superseded by a new article --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Delete Per DJ. Mr N 00:03, May 6 Delete No real usefulness even if it was rewritten. --Argo v8.2 04:53, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Redirect to said other article. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 10:06, May 6
Comments

HowTo:Obliterate a Toilet through Defecation

Keep
Delete	Delete LOLOLOLOL TURLET HUMOR!!! no, just no --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Flush It. Not quite good enough.--Count of Monkey Crisco 18:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Delete This article should be obliterated through defecation. Useless.--Argo v8.2 04:58, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Mmm, nice. Get rid. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 10:09, May 6 Delete. Mr N 11:40, May 6
Comments

Spanish Inquisition

Keep	Keep. It made me smile in some parts. Certainly not good enough to be an FA, but it's not deletable. I'd say just give it a listectomy and call it a day. - Don *Leddy the Crunch* (Nyah, see, n y a h !) 23:35, May 5 Keep I'm posting in the forum in one minute. --Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 23:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Keep. Mr N 01:27, May 6 Keep and roll back to the featured version, which is cruftless. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:23, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Mild Keep. I have no idea why this was a featured article, maybe it needs to be undone back to an earlier state but it's not too awful so I'm giving it a pass.--Count of Monkey Crisco 03:48, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Keep Just keeps out of the delete range. Shoulda done this when STM was here, he would have re-written it to awesomeness! --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 07:40, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Weak keep. It's not good, but then, it shows how far we've come. Commit listicide on it and leave it be. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 10:04, May 6
Delete	Delete. Featured article from 2005 which should never have been featured. See the forum topic at Forum:VFH in '05 = VFD in '08 and vote delete. Give someone new a chance to rewrite this utter shite. Le Cejak • <May 05, 2008 [23:26]> Delete. Per nearly every rule of HTBFANJS, whether you're looking at the current or featured version. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 23:28 May 05, 2008
Comments	STM is gonna be REALLY REALLY PISSED! hahaha! Le Cejak • <May 05, 2008 [23:29]> STM's not here. Also, get out of this section! It's going to get huge if/when the shit hits the fan, so to speak. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 23:30 May 05, 2008 To Led: Should we get rid of the quotes too? and the cliches? and the random pictures? Le Cejak • <May 05, 2008 [23:37]> Some of them(especially the quotes). Some of the cliches, I think, are to be anticipated, and almost hoped for, in a page like this, though. For example, I was almost hoping for a spin on the whole "no one expects yadda yadda yadda," thing. It's overdone, but it almost needs an article because of that overdone-ness. If nothing else, we can use this page to say "we have Spanish Inquisition about that already, keep it off other pages." - Don *Leddy the Crunch* (Nyah, see, n y a h !) 23:54, May 5 Comment. Maybe needs reversion to an earlier, funnier incarnation. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:48, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Everyone expects the Keep...something! -- The Zombiebaron 13:26, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

List of Ubuntu forks

Keep	Keep I pokes fun at all the Ubuntu versions. It needs more work and needs less lists. Maybe a short description of each flavor of Ubuntu. If huffed redirect to Command Line as that is what most Ubuntu flavors end up looking like anyway, a command line that fails to load Xfree.org anyway. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 04:40, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Keep. It has something I can't quite put my finger on. Text, perhaps. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 02:57, 05 May 2008 Keep. Mr N 11:41, May 6
Delete	Delete. It's a list, a list of Ubuntu forks. If anyone is tech savvy enough to show why tyhis is hilarious maybe I'll change my vote, bur right now it's lame.--Count of Monkey Crisco 23:15, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments	I think the "joke" is that there are too many new versions of Linux kicking around these days, not really that funny perhaps, but I'm and Abs on this one, as it's got some (not much) merit. Mr N 01:28, May 3 La la la -- The Zombiebaron 13:25, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

World War Negative One

Keep
Delete	Delete Awful article... with lame memes! --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 12:04, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Delete A bad idea, badly written. ----OEJ 14:37, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Stubby little bad idea that won't be missed. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 15:54, May 4 Delete Just kill it. --Nightmare975 02:48, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Joe Rogan

Keep
Delete	Delete. Just lame. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 05:58, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. I could not find a reason to keep it. Where is the funny? Mr N 16:20, May 3 Delete. Is not good. Short, choppy, unfunny. ----OEJ 20:00, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Fail on a fail --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 11:56, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Yup, crap again. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 15:48, May 4
Comments

IWETHEY

Keep	Keep This was put on VFD before and it was voted to keep. IWETHEY is a famous web site for the Microsoft/SCO lawsuit against Linux. It is like Livejournal or MySpace or Digg. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 02:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Keep It's not particularly funny, but neither are a lot of things that are central to Uncyclopedia lore, such as Clinjas. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 06:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Meh. Can't argue with a bit of history, can you? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 15:39, May 4
Delete	Delete on the grounds of listy, vanity, ugly, perjury, and very bad-y. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 22:36, 2 May 2008 (UTC) *Delete I tried to find a reason to keep this, then figured out who these guys are, and gave up... Mr N 02:25, May 3
Comments	On second thoughts Abs, check out how many pages link to this one... Mr N 02:27, May 3 It has been in since 2005 and yes a lot of articles link to it as well as Uncyclopedia is the worst. They criticized Uncyclopedia and we made fun of them. They are a spin-off of Infoworld, many of them are from Infoword. The IWE stands for Infoworld Electric. Plus they blanked and vandalized articles here like Anonymous Slashy did so we created a special article to mock them as we did Slashy. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 02:29, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Old VFD vote is here: [1]. Mr N 04:06, May 3 Kept. VFD special case clause 34b. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 02:57, 05 May 2008

Knock-off_nigel

Keep	Keep I get all my DVDs from this guy. Also "Knock-off Nigel" is a well know popular character in this neck of the woods, so I think it stays. Mr N 18:45, May 2 Weak Keep. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Meh. If it stays, can we at least rewrite tag it? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 15:31, May 4
Delete	Knock-off this Article Not funny, no redeeming value, and edited once since last July (a spelling edit). A complete waste of server space. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 16:40, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments	[insert Kept here] -- The Zombiebaron 03:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Tom Morello

Keep	Surprised weak keep. Rewrite tag - there is far worse bandcruft out there, and there are even a few passable lines in here. A discography removal, and a swift crap-ectomy, and it should have potential. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 08:17, Apr 28 Keep Yea, there is worse than this around... Mr N 17:42, Apr 29 Weak Keep - I sort of like it, for some odd reason. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. Unfunny, random musiciancruft --Kurgan's Back. Prepare to get pwned. (Unless you are Chuck Norris) 02:10, 27 April 2008 (UTC) Weak Delete. Not total garbage, but not quite good enough. --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:20, 27 April 2008 (UTC) Delete. Its lame. -- Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 03:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC) Ix-nay. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex ! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEE ING • HP • BFF @ 02:08 May 3
Comments	I've edited it, taken out some unfunny stuff and added in a bunch of stuff that most people probably will not find funny. When I created the article, I asked that people improve upon it, so I ask anyone who voted delete to throw in some ideas on the talk page. Becasue of conflict of interests, I won't wote here, but ask everyone to take another look. Gopherbassist 20:04, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Oh, oops -- The Zombiebaron 03:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC)