From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion. |
Keep |
- Keep Pointless pr0nography. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 21:42 Sep 08, 2007
- Keep Could do with a little enhancement. The Oblong Lobster 21:46, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep on the grounds that I need a place where I can find softcore pornography. --General Insineratehymn 01:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per Skull and Insineratehymn. Also, I agree they need some enhancement. --Dexter111344 01:49, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Rewrite. Okay, seriously. This article is going to exist. At the very least, let's make it an article that's worth reading, hm? Ж Kalir, Crazy Indie Gamer (missile ponies for everyone!) 03:03, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- I rewrote it, but somebody reverted it because I "took too much out". --EMC [TALK] 05:49, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep. Face it, it could be much worse, and if it gets deleted, it will probably return in just such a worse form. Does that make sense? Oh, and piffle. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:45, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - emc's version is good. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Total carp. Ermm, crap. I know there's a WIP tag on it, but it hasn't been seriously changed for some time now. ~ 20:40, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 21:03, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - This deserves to go on VFD. In fact when I get the chance I'm going to put it on there....I'm....pissed.The Oblong Lobster 21:48, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- The only bit that I liked (and earlier, cuter version of the picture) is gone, and deleted, so there's nothing worth saving. Pages like this are hard, as they tend to just come off as racist or, in this case, anti-semitic.Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Fishy piffle. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:43, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Dear Doctor: It has been seven days, nutty bunny. Oh, you must be on the metric calendar. In that case, let me rephrase; it's been eleventeen kilo-metrons. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- I thought it was seven days since last edit. That's what the maintainence page is based off of, anyhow. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 05:36 Sep 09, 2007
- We are all confused, I think. The blurb for the construction template states that "Pages that have not been edited in more than a month can be assumed abandoned or finished, and may be deleted or have the tag removed.". The seven day thing is a difference between VFH & QVFD. Or maybe Wip. What we need, I think, is more templates. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Kept due to WIPness -- The Zombiebaron 15:42, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Give it a chance Ok, first of all, it is WIP, you should give it a chance, I'm hoping I can get this improved a few days or so.--Dark Paladin X 22:01, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- WiP. The WiP tag promises seven days. Let it have seven days. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 22:20 Sep 08, 2007
- Woop!. Okay, I'll admit that I doubt this will survive VFD when it, inevitably, arrives here in a week, if that future version is like the current version. I, personally, probably wouldn't vote at all on it (ignorance of the subject matter is a shitty excuse for voting to kill what may, in fact, be a merely mediocre page). That being said, however, it's a WiP, you heartless villains. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:01, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I don't like Pokemon. In fact, I hate it. But, the WiP template promises seven days since the last edit by the author(s). The template might as well be VFDed if it isn't going to save an article from a quick deletion, anymore. --Dexter111344 02:05, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. As per MO. ~ 07:29, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. All we are saying is give piffle a chance (although the userspace move sounds like a plan, Hannibal). --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Not bad enough to be considered WIP abuse. Plus, it's less than two days old. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:42, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Nom/Delete House request by LjLego. For some reason, I can't bring my self to disagree. Uncanny.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 20:28, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This shall be the return of the super-long Ljlego delete reasons! Perfect place to begin. First off, I realize this is technically a WiP, but from what's there so far, this is not keepable by any means. If this subject matter were even to be expanded further, it would still remain utter shit. It randomly namedrops people, places, things, and other famous entities that make absolutely no sense within context or without. It pushes quite a few of my buttons, including referencing emos poorly, referencing Pokèmon period, etc etc. There is absolutely nothing redeemable about this article. DELETE!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:36, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Pokemon? Why does a computer game need more than one article. Can't there just be one called Pokemon? Am I making any kind of point? The Oblong Lobster 21:50, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Short reason. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:58, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. I Have No Idea What This Is It Should Have Been ICU'd Oh Well Too Late Now VFD Time Mates – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 19:08 Sep 08, 2007
- Delete. The only person who should be writing about Bloodbath is KP. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:10, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete 5 Minutes: My head hurts after reading that. 13 Minutes: Stop with the upper-case it forks my soul. 25 Minutes: I Fly In a Helicopter and shoot Mr T. 90 Minutes: What's...who?...help me. The Oblong Lobster 21:54, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Not written like an UnNews article at all. And he really could have written this in a much less annoying and idiotic way. --Dexter111344 02:00, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Random, hard to read piffle. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:37, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Awful formatting--Sir Manforman 15:49, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted Was invented in 2045 but was first conceived in 2101. Where's the narrative. Come on people!!!! The Oblong Lobster 16:53, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- I once called the Kim Jong-Il "D3AR L3AD3R" as a bit on a page. I hope it was funnier than this page. I'm scared to check, now. Hold me. *shiver* Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:15, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Robocaust -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:35, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It mentions two distinct years of creation, and they happen to be about 70 years apart. This is the second thing that says delete. The first is the inclusion 1337 in the title and in a "quote" from Adolf Hitler. I've grown to despise the quote mechanism, though used well it does add quality. Though I'm tempted to give it redemption for linking Nazi, I just can't let this tripe make it past this. Look at the formatting! That alone makes it work killing. Rampant namedropping and randomness help the matter. Fact: this article sucks.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:41, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was clicking the Random page and stumbled across this and decide to fix some of the red links. I didn't realize it one of the Hitler's on VFD. --Dexter111344 21:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Waek Keep Not authored by Cheeseboy by any chance is it? The Oblong Lobster 12:16, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Funny I'm keeping it --Kpmartin18 18:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Oh come on: "Still on the top of this high hill the giant windmill turns, implacable as Halle Berry, majestic as Cheech and Chong." There's funny stuff here, tho' I say it wot shouldn't. ----OEJ 00:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Some funny there. Most of the problems could be fixed by UN:PS. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:35, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per Cs1987. --Dexter111344 17:46, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Good Enough --Kpmartin18 18:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Pretty average, but only seems to have been nominated because of the author. The Oblong Lobster 20:55, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and tag with rewrite, along with the rest of Cheeseboy's Franz Ferdinand series. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 11:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Not too bad. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Yet, even more Cheeseboy cruft, horrible--Sir Manforman 12:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
*Delete. Seriously though, what is it with this guy? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Changing my vote to an abstain based on the Alex Kapranos re-nom above, and the fact that this is average, as Lobster says, rather than deletable tripe. (I was in a bad mood last night when I made the original vote). However, it still doesn't have any laughs that I can find. Is it too late to ICU it? If so, maybe a rewrite tag? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:25, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- To old for NRV, but nor for a re-write tag--Sir Manforman 11:59, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keepund -- The Zombiebaron 15:32, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep Mildly amusing. I think Chesseboy's FF obsession is second to Manformans Cheeseboy obsession. The Oblong Lobster 11:32, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Vote stricken again as per other Franz noms - it's not dreadful, just not funny. ICU or re-write tag? Still want to know what Cheeseboy's FF obsession is about though... --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Per the Lounge Request--Sir Manforman 01:32, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Random, with a few good phrases. Borderline incoherent: look at the "where it comes from" paragraph. Underdeveloped. ----OEJ 03:13, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Delete I agree that it isn't that great, but perhaps we can consider a merge (or at least redirect) to Milk. Pentium5dot1 01:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 02:51, September 8, 2007
|
Comments |
- I made it less bad. Also, more better. I do that sometimes. Then I went to the bathroom. You're out of toilet paper. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- If this gets deleted, can the deletor (or deletrix) put a copy under my userpage? I've smoothed out some of the wrinkles on the page; I'm hoping Sophia returns so that I can finish. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:22, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keeped. -- The Zombiebaron 15:30, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Horrible - flooded with lists, red links, formatting isues, stuff that makes article suck--Sir Manforman 12:02, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Hardly horrible, but pretty dull. The Oblong Lobster 12:11, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Meh -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:14, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 02:51, September 8, 2007
|
Comments |
- Abs. It's a bit dull, but hardly horrible, and could be rescued with a re-write by someone who knows anything about the place (which counts me out). --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:02, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Additional: I've now dealt with the red links, sorted some spelling and removed a couple of the more pointless lists. Better? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Random nonsense --General Insineratehymn 23:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Not everyday I manage to find as many random words as possible strung together. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 00:40, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Lou -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 00:51, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 02:51, September 8, 2007
- Delete. The most random thing I've seen in a while. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:33, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:08, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Could Lou defeat samurai morris men? -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 15:20, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete--Sir Manforman 20:20, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:38, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 02:51, September 8, 2007
- Delete. Dull vaguely random stub. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:27, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. As per Under_user. ----OEJ 10:29, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:08, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 15:16, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- This is an article written by one of the noobs I've adopted. It has had an NRV tag for nearly a month and it is going nowhere, with the author and IP addresses crapping it up, it seems to be going nowhere. I Pee-Reviewed it, and it appears he hasn't taken my advice. --Sir Manforman 20:12, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Rape is totally funny -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:37, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 02:51, September 8, 2007
- Delete. Bad. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:25, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Rape EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 08:47, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:08, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - "This mentally scared her"(SIC). The Oblong Lobster 14:10, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 15:21, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:34, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Dirty little minxes, I definitely would. This article isn't great though is it? No The Oblong Lobster 20:06, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 22:59, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 02:51, September 8, 2007
- Delete. Random stub. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:16, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:06, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete - Crap in pretty much all respects. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:23, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete- I want to cry. I want the tears to drop onto my keyboard rendering it useless against the terrible irrelevence of this moment. The Oblong Lobster 19:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Debate -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:26, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- BURZUM > This page -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:28, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 22:59, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Shitty band-related shit And, I literally mean shit. As in, this is as crappy as what you can find in your septic tank. No, seriously. --Dexter111344 02:35, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 02:51, September 8, 2007
- Delete. Astoundingly poor. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:15, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:05, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom/Delete Construction or not, I don't see this going anywhere remotely good.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 01:19, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- WH☭RE,
- .......... -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 02:11, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 02:51, September 8, 2007
- "Deleate". Says it all. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:35, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Huff through a small straw EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 08:45, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:09, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep Badly formatted and short but there's some really good ideas in it. The Oblong Lobster 13:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- When I see this on Recent changes, it gets uglier every single time, even the NSFW tag on it isn't enough. Encyclopedia Dramatica style userpage--Sir Manforman 12:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This is pointless borderline porn. The Oblong Lobster 15:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
I don't thik we're allowed to touch user pages? Are we? I don't know. I once knew but those days are gone. The Oblong Lobster 13:24, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- This sub-userpage was deleted--Sir Manforman 13:26, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- CVP as well to prevent further re-creation--Sir Manforman 13:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- CVP a userpage? That's just a bit too far... ban the user a bit and warn him to not place the pr0n back again or else there will be bigger troubles. That seems more logical. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:18, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Kept, but with a warning. -- The Zombiebaron 19:40, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
Abstain - it was jast tagged today. Just ban patrol the person who removed the tag--Sir Manforman 12:40, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I did when the tag was first removed. The ban still hasn't happened yet. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:10, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Yet, another article about a town we just don't need--Sir Manforman 23:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- "What a faggot." LOL! -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 00:37, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Random and unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:48, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- A child is born, an article is deleted -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 11:22, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Childish and pointless. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:33, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep: It's not doing anyone any harm, it has its moments, and got two fairly good Pee Reviews - one for 29 and one for 46, which makes it a 35/50 article. It's one of the better articles in Uncyclopedia. --Andy the Idiot 22:39, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I like it. You would understand it better if you were Australian. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. This would make sense if you were an Aussie. I'm not, which explains why my koalas keep dying. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Regarding what happened today with part of the team being arrested, i think it should be kept. And it does make more sense if you are Australian, which i am. --Brayds2006 11:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - It's HILARIOUS! You have to watch the show to get it. Whoever did that pommy and yank thing on page, BRILLIANT!
- Keep I've never voted keep so many times on VFD as I have done in the last few days. There's a lot worse than a lot fo the stuff that's being nominated at the moment. The Oblong Lobster 11:11, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete Low quality. Superfailed VFH nom. OA is a few bricks short of a smokehouse.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 12:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, but Christ, Flammable, read the rules of VFD! 15 nominations only! Delete some of the fershlugginer articles below you before here do this. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 14:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I agree with Killerfroggy --Andy the Idiot 22:39, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- We didn't have no stinkin' VFD Rules before I came back. Also, I think I counted 14 this morning. Othwerise I would have cleared some out. Unless I'm confusing that with Monday morning. *shrug*--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 02:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep it. This article is still pretty much under construction. It is on PeeReview. --Andy the Idiot 22:39, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Not too bad. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:25, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I have seen proof that a American Man Eating Hawk [1] does exist so I am willing to bet this one exist also. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [citation needed] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 05:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Not great. I was expecting a Mexican man eating an eagle. That would've been cool. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep It's alright. It's kind of like a Wednesday. The Oblong Lobster 11:18, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Ehhh... I'm not sure which way to vote for this one. Count this as an abstain. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Can I vote for my own pages? You can on VFD... --Andy the Idiot 22:39, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes. Also, this is VFD. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, that was a typo... it was meant to be VFH. Sorry 'bout that. --Andy the Idiot 00:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
(UTC)
|
Comments |
- The version nominated for VFD had a section titled "Proof" deleted. I restored it; it's mostly satirical maths. This may make it more interesting to some
geeks smart people. ----OEJ 03:20, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Looks like crappy vanity to me, based off of some forum-or-other's creator. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:27 Sep 05, 2007
- Delete - Random. Also, nobody cares. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:48, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Somebody doesn't like a game company, and as, Cs1987 said, nobody cares. ----OEJ 03:04, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 03:18, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:09, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Mind you, nice work OEJ. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 23:36, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Deletitize -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 11:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- See the revision history: the second section was originally a list defaming what I believe are the admins of an Internet forum. I replaced it with the snotty bit about vindictive cyberbullies before the article made it onto the VFD list (which was full at the time). ----OEJ 03:04, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete--Sir Manforman 21:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete because idiots keep adding stupid shit and I can't decided what needs to be removed(and it is clear that I've tried; check the page history). This should just be completely deleted and allow someone(not me) to write it completely over. --Dexter111344 00:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 01:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Random, unfunny and poorly written. I couldn't find a good version in the history. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:53, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Unfunny, random, vandal-magnet bandcruft with obligatory gay "jokes". CVP, anyone? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:35, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and then go for a sneeky pint. The Oblong Lobster 12:25, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete That one picture scares me. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:27, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep (a) Look him up on Wikipedia it even mentions who he is in this article. (b) This was just voted to be kept. (c) Stop being a plank Manforman The Oblong Lobster 20:50, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Sigh... -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:11, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Ineligible per "This was recently kept via VFD", and their hasn't been much change in it(if any). --Dexter111344 00:03, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Ineligible Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:51, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep/ineligible. And it's not as bad as the other Franz-related articles by Cheeseboy. He seems a bit obsessed. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:16, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- This was recently kept via VFD, but I'm re-nominating it based on the fact that (a), who the hell is this person and (b), looking the other articles written by the same author, people finally seem to realize just how awful his articles are based on the comments shown below--Sir Manforman 20:34, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Just because someone has a Wikipedia profile doesn't mean we know who he is here. All of his articles are being voted to be deleted, and it looks like everybody thinks the rest of his articles are crap, so I thought I'd give it a 2nd go--Sir Manforman 20:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- He's the lead singer of Franz Ferdinand. And who are you referring to as the 'we' in your 'we know'? The Oblong Lobster 21:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- If you know who this guy is, than why don't you do a re-write and make this article better?--Sir Manforman 21:02, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Why would I want to do that? The Oblong Lobster 21:04, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- (1), it needs a re-write, (2), since it's probably going to be deleted and you know who the guy is, wouldn't you want to whip it into shape to save it from deletion?--Sir Manforman 21:06, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- No The Oblong Lobster 21:08, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep - It's long, random and hard to read, but that's the entire point of the article. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yep. Could do with some good pictures. ~ 07:41, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. It's not bad in places. Although I to disagree with Cs I think that improving the formatting and readability would help it. And some pictures. Possibly rewrite tag it and see if it gets picked up in conservation week. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:12, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I'll try working on rewrite for it or atleast add some pictures to it.--Scott 01:33, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep but touch up. needs to be more than a bunch of paragraphs. a few random pictures would work... JediBob Things I've said Things I've done 22:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Kept. MadMax 19:05, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete - Yet another random, unfunny character/meme blending article. Also, the rather similar Satan-Shadow needs to be VFDed when there is room to do so. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 05:31, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Rubbish. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:41, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 23:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't know who's telling these popular historical figures and video game characters to suddenly merge with each other, but if I ever see the person, I'm going to rip them a new one. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Listcruft, by which I mean it's not an article but just a compendium of calumny. ----OEJ 03:33, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 03:35, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Well, for the occasional not too bad one (Velvet Revolver), there's a load of crap, and it's a potential abuse magnet as Flammable observes. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:30, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 23:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. This article thinks Fallout Boy "Fucking sucks ass". Fallout Boy, you've met your match. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:20, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete--Sir Manforman 01:35, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, please -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 03:00, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Random and unfunny. Probably will never get deleted on ICU. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:13, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and CVP. I'll try to work on a good version of this article, for once. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:18, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 23:16, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. The usual bandcruft. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:38, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Note: The previous version I referred to at the Poopsmith's Lounge was under the capitalization "DragonForce". If this is deleted, consider CVPing both titles until somebody produces an approved rewrite. Pentium5dot1 04:32, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Mostly random, poorly written and unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Ditto Cs1987's comments. Look at this: "Or counter strike barbie is gay you know? gay as in FUCKYOU?" Just bad. ----OEJ 03:36, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- FUCKYOU? -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 03:41, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Del Taco Plain Stupid, and the article kinda changes subject from CS to WWF wrestling. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [citation needed] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 04:53, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:08, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Hnng. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Short and lacking in humour. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:42, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Randumb to the point of idiocy. ----OEJ 03:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 03:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Puns shouldn't be used for evil. Except when I make 'em. I'm punny. /me shoots self in head Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:07, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:08, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Crap stub. /me shoots Modus in head a second time, because it looked like fun. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:55, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- I ICU'd it god knows when, and it is going nowhere--Sir Manforman 01:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Per ICU and nom. It should have had an expired ICU but it was vandalisem and was reset. I had to reset it again when I added the {{VFD}} tag to the page. This page goes in to very little detail and is only funny for a millisecond after that its total crap. Also the secret is total Bullocks. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [citation needed] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 02:11, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Dunno. I like it. ~ 07:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep It made me laugh, AND I'm not drunk...well not what I call drunk. The Oblong Lobster 11:42, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. Part 2 of 2 of my "Too long, too pointless, too random" series. Huff and redirect to Recursion, or something similar. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:51, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 01:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Delete Please -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 07:12, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Huff and rewrite, jettisoning the entire current text. EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 08:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. While I', sure there is potential for a good article on infinity, this isn't it, and I don't see it has any potential to be improved either. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:10, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per Kip the Dip--Sir Manforman 13:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Random BS about a non-existing subject that the author keeps linking to from math and chemistry. Not fun. -- Swami A. Suresh 16:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:29, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed Too short--Dark Paladin X 20:14, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:39, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 21:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Stupid, no content. --R. Daneel Olivaw (Gaia - Foundation) 00:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:50, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Short and crap. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:05, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- DeleteArticle hasn't changed since I tagged ICU on this article on 8/25. Style is a total rip from a conservapedia article, it lacks humor and is completely random. Even as liberal, I find this article to be stupid with nonsense jokes. And trust me, I can make fun of other liberal commentators as well.--Dark Paladin X 14:56, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:45, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 23:52, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:50, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Random, unfunny, poor. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:05, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Horrible, listy, red links, and towncruft--Sir Manforman 14:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 16:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Blegh. The one thing I hate the most about bad articles is truly unsightly formatting. This has it. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:49, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Random, ugly and unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:52, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Ticks all the delete boxes. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete - based on the following criteria:
- It's a worst 100 list. With it only counting down to 85, It's far from a 100 list
- No Images
- AND, it's not good--Sir Manforman 01:26, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. You anti-list Illuminati folk are getting on my back, though. Saying to delete simply because it's a list shouldn't cut it. Luckily, this article sucks anyway, as does an incomplete list. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:29, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Righteous!!!!!!! Um, no wait, I mean, incomplete and not funny. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 01:39, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 02:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:59, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 15:05, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Poor, quite random, not funny. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- If you read my comments, you'll see my reasoning and why I voted to delete. There are good lists such as Worst 100 Ways to Deliver Bad News and several others. I am not anti-list, I am anti-bad list.--Sir Manforman 01:35, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- You mis-understood me. How can it be a worst 100 list with it only counting down to 85 instead of 0--Sir Manforman 01:40, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, welcome to Uncyclopedia. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep The pic with the dancing cat is the saving grace. --Omb 18:38, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete Unfunny, random shit. Generic VFD article. --User:Randomjunk52/sig 8:11 AM, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yep. ~ 12:19, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Unfunny, like most meme-mixing articles. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:43, 2 September
2007 (UTC)
- Remove -- (Bonner) (Talk) 13:39, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Crucify/Holocaust Although the dancing cat picture is cute. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 21:45, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - a picture of a dancing cat is not a reason to keep--Sir Manforman 22:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Lame -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 00:37, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete despite the very nifty headings. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:11, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 01:59, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Dancing cat is not enough to save this overall piece of crap. User:SlAveMAstErSquArED.sig 8:14, 3 September 2007
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 15:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Flamethrower I expect hundreds of Jews AND Christians find this to be really stupid and offesnive. Hitler hates them anyways.--Dark Paladin X 18:52, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Seriously poor. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:58, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
* It's not that funny but it certainly not stupid enough to deserve deletion. A bit of good editing is in order. --Omb 18:37, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed with Omb, I try to make it NOT stupid, but didn't bring out some humor Digi should reconsider on revamping the article.--Dark Paladin X 14:33, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Nom and Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 17:42, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Purge. Hate hate hat (shitty) Pokemon articles! -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:12, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 01:57, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Random and unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:58, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Random, dull, more pointless Emo stuff. Just really poor. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:39, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- DElete Why is there more than one article on Pokemon? The Oblong Lobster 20:49, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete - really bad formatting--Sir Manforman 12:59, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Total shit as well -- (Bonner) (Talk) 13:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 17:47, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 01:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Crap in most respects. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Wow, that is bad. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. One really terrible paragraph and nothing else. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:37, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete - this is the Worst100 I've seen, there is not a single picture and it is all in bold text--Sir Manforman 12:48, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Crap in most respects. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:55, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Total rubbish -- (Bonner) (Talk) 13:22, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 17:49, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Boring and not funny --matrempit 18:48, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Stupid -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 21:47, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 01:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. There may have been something funny at the end, but I hadn't the will to get far enough to find out. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:31, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Lazy, crappy...It makes me cry. The Oblong Lobster 11:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|