Forum:New Admin vote

Forums: Index > Village Dump > New Admin vote (talk)

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6241 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Hello, and welcome to the "New Administrator Vote" voting page. Here, registered users will be able to vote on current users for an administrative position. This round of voting will only result in one new administrator. As there are only four {4) nominees, please limit yourself to only one vote for the user you believe is MOST qualified for the position of sysop. After a period of time (probably 2 or 3 days), the user with the most votes will be sysopped.

Please keep in mind that sysops votes will count twice as much as registered users (as they will better know, from experience, which users have the qualities required to be a successful sysop). In the score counter, this will show up as 2 points per admin vote, and 1 point for user votes. If an op wishes to vote for two users, they may split their vote in half using weak for for two users. Please: NO against votes. If you don't wish to support one specific nominee vote for another.

All comments should be directed to the talk page.

Voting Closed

On behalf of your admin team, thank you all for your votes, comments and suggestions.

• 18:16, 16 January 2007 Chronarion changed group membership for User:Braydie from (none) to (none) (+sysop)
• 18:16, 16 January 2007 Chronarion changed group membership for User:Zombiebaron from (none) to (none) (+sysop)
• 18:15, 16 January 2007 Chronarion changed group membership for User:Flyingfeline from (none) to (none) (+sysop)

Nominations

Flyingfeline (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +22

• Nominated by a net of 6 admins, with no against votes.
• For --General Insineratehymn 23:14, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 00:21, 14 Jan 2007
• For -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 00:33, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For, Congratulation. 00:38, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For, Go FF, but sorry Zombiebaron... next time eh old chap? --Olipro Anchor KUN (Harass) 01:21, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 05:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. Decisive and shows good judgement... also, name is cat-related.  c • > • cunwapquc? 06:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. She's very helpful, and is doing a nice job. -Gnome  …MUN F@H Gnome 11:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For If I had it my way, you'd all be admins, but no one cares about what I want, so uhh...congrats, flyingfeline, and keep it up for ' 07. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 16:48, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For, hard choice, but my 'for' had to go here in the end -- sannse (talk) 17:13, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For -- mowgli 08:27, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• For - --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 09:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• For --The Rt. Hon. BarryC MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 21:46, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. -- SonicChao ^Babbel!_Contribs 22:20, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• For... Who'd have thunk it, eh, FF? ~ sin($) ^tan(€) 10:31, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
• For --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 16:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC) </drivebyvote>

Zombiebaron (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +21

• Nominated by a net of 6 admins, with againsts considered.
• For --User:Nintendorulez 23:58, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
• For -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 00:29, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. --Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 00:34, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. He's had this coming for a long time. —The Right Honourable Major Sir Hinoa KUN UmP UotM Bur MDA NS CM (talk) 01:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 02:05, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For I trust this man with my articles, but not with my weaponry. Seeing as Uncyc is a place of peace (or at least weaponless violence) I have no problem with this. --Ж Kalir, Awesome Author_{(alliteration affords additional awesome)} 03:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For because we need more undead admins. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:31, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For, I thought he was already admin... --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 06:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For, gives me PORN, unlike these other Communazis on here. ~McDestroyertron (talk) 20:53, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Really? Wher - Er, I mean, sick sick people! --User:Nintendorulez 21:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. Hopefully I won't regret this, but I know I will. --EMC ^[TALK] 20:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For —Braydie at 21:28, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. --KATIE!! 21:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 08:13, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. He's been around since the dawn of time, the others can wait.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 19:51, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. --Sir Volte KUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH) 06:01, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
• Weak For. R 13:08, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Braydie (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +20

• Nominated by a net of 5 admins, with no against votes.
• Strong For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
• For --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 00:18, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. Tough decision.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:40, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For, tough decision indeed.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:10, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For, and I would vote for all four if I could.--<<>> 02:18, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For Continually impresses me with the amount and quality of his work. He makes me feel inadequate, as well. That has to count for something. Right? --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 15:23, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For Yeah Braydie! Stop doing so much work at QVFD! -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 15:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For ENeGMA's inadequacies. Keep up the psychological terror, Braydie!--Procopius 17:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. Tough choice, but I know and trust him the best. I do wish I could vote for all four candidates, though. goshzillacorrespondence 18:18, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For A very hard working individual who deserves this very much. --The Zombiebaron 19:21, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For A very helpful chap indeed. Good man. -- 19:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• for. wasn't an easy choice, but Braydie is the best man for the job - jack mort | cunt | talk - 20:20, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• For The GPF always supports its members. Oh yeah, and he's pretty helpful too. --LordKaT
• David Gerard 23:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. -- Mitch 05:51, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
• Weak For R 13:11, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
• For --Composure1 16:27, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Olipro (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +6

• Nominated by a net of 3 admins, with no against votes.
• For. Has deserved it for yonks, plus he voted for me. -- 12:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. Olipro is a delectable individual; ergo, he receives my vote. -- 20:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Moral support. Even though Olipro's got no morals! Ohh. --KATIE!! 21:50, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Nice.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 22:23, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• For I totally thought he was an admin already. --PantsMacKenzie 02:14, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• For...yeah, same here...— H. Peebles - D - HS 08:25, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: I wish I could have voted for two, because it was hard to not vote for Olipro. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 06:20, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
• For Sikon 16:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)