Uncyclopedia:VFH

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

VFH contents

• Nominate
• All nominated articles
• See also

• Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
• Voters: Please try and include some kind of reasoning. When voting against, explain where the article falls short so that the author can perhaps try and fix it up and improve it.
• This is not a discussion page. If you'd like detailed feedback on your article, please submit it for a PeeReview.
• Want a gadget that lets you mark the articles you've already voted on? Follow the instructions here to enable it.
• View recent changes for VFH here, and if deleted nominations are showing up and that bugs you, .
• Due to a technical glitch caused by DPL being a dumbass, any signature with two dashes (i.e. "--") will cause the VFH page to go kaput.

Any and all violators of policy will be terminated.

   

VFH status:
6.6666666666667E+128 votes per article • Goal: 5

Search VFH archive

VFH is not a discussion page. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.

All nominated articles

The Annals of Butoxus

(feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: 1
Nomination:	ShabiDOO 13:50, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
For Votes: 1	For
Against Votes: 0	No against votes

Internal Revenue Service

(feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: 3.5 dollars gleefully given to the Gub'mint
Nomination:	yesterday was tax day and it reminded me this exists 168.11.96.2 (talk) 18:02, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
For Votes: 4.5	nom and for and stuff 168.11.96.2 (talk) 18:02, 16 April 2025 (UTC)  For. Definitely not torture. MrX blow me 21:44, 17 April 2025 (UTC)  For. 17:57, 2 May 2025 (UTC)  For. Mr. George / talk 18:07, 2 May 2025 (UTC) Have edited much of the article. ShabiDOO 13:22, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Against Votes: 1	Oppose The article could use some updating (the latest date mentioned is 2006) and some significant copyediting. Norb (talk) 18:34, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Comments	@Norb: it got significantly edited, is it to your liking now? 168.11.96.2 (talk) 11:40, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Redundancy

(feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: 0 -1,000,000,000,000,000............,000.5 (I forgot)
Nomination:	(joke)(Also a joke) Not featured enough, must nominate. (Also not featured enough (Joke nomination)). — L10nM4st3r ROAR at me! / What my paws scratched 14:12, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
For Votes: 1.0E+129	For. (JK) Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 14:35, 14 April 2025 (UTC) I love it (my vote counts as a zillion) ShabiDOO 21:47, 14 April 2025 (UTC)  For. actually this is a good idea I guess in my opinion (which is usually the wrong opinion) 168.11.96.2 (talk) 11:49, 15 April 2025 (UTC)  For. I AM THE ONE. THE LEGENDARY TIEBREAKER. AS THE PROPHECY FORTOLD. I HAVE COME TO VOTE TO NOMINATE THIS ARTICLE. ALL UNCYCLOPEDIANS WORSHIP AT MY FEET! ANYONE WHO DARES VOTE AGAINST ME SHALL EXPERIENCE THE WRATH OF 10,000 FURIOUS LIONS! Coffi (talk) 03:42, 25 April 2025 (UTC) Not redundant enough. Please make your message more redundant. Your message doesn't repeat what it says. All must be redundant. Redundantly, from your redundant L10nM4ST3R! — L10nM4st3r ROAR at me! / What my paws scratched 06:14, 26 April 2025 (UTC) Redundant Yes, maybe. I don't know, this vote probably doesn't matter. 17:53, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
Against Votes: 1.0E+129	Against. (Also JK) Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 14:35, 14 April 2025 (UTC) I hate it (my vote counts as a zillion) ShabiDOO 21:47, 14 April 2025 (UTC)  Against. (Also JK) This has already be featured. It's basically redundancy. My face is beautiful, so is the rest of me! 05:17, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

See also

Old VFH archives: 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14