Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive170

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.

Evil Impression of Edward Cullen

Keep
Delete	Delete. I wonder if there is anything worth keeping about this article. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:11, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Strong Delete We don't need 3486398469836 Articles on Hot Gay Sex. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[citation needed]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 21:22, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete.I just finished reading Twilight and this article doesnt do him justice.-- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 21:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC) D1337 Dreadful. Just dreadful. Also: You should be ashamed of yourself for admitting you read Twilight. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 21:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete and give Simsilikesims a warning ban for bad taste in literature. pillow talk 22:49, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete Mr N 22:55, Jan 29
Comments

Template:Hoax

Keep
Delete	Strong Delete} It looks its trying to be a fix template and tells the author to fill the ranodom bullshit. And, it sticks the article in its own obscure little category, instead of the fix or rewrite category. In addition, it has incorrect work instructions (it says it places articles in Category:Shit but really places them in Category:True Facts and Other Deleted Prose), and it tries to make up deletion policy. Also, it is not on any userpage. --Mnbvcxz 17:41, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Nah thanks -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 20:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Strong Huff Yea it's Redunant to the Facts Detected Template and is a crapier version. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[citation needed]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 21:11, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Please delete thank you. pillow talk 22:50, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Time we got rid of all these useless templates. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Jean Reno

Keep
Delete	Delete. Utterly pointless, on one page. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 16:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per above. --Mnbvcxz 17:21, 29 January 2009 (UTC) QVFD - Now it's Orphaned Well with the magic of the Template Substitution this template is now orphaned and should be deleted now. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[citation needed]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 21:15, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Hesitant D1337 I could see where this could be used (namely anything involving France), but the picture is too horrendous to leave. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 21:41, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Smashy --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 21:56, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Stonecutters

Keep
Delete	Delete. So then I got to thinking "Template:Sandboxed" would be fine if it weren't on any articles and if I changed the word "article" to "page" in the template. Turns out this is the only article the template is on. And it's a steaming pile of shit. So I put it on VFD. And then I got to thinking that it might be fun to drive a cheesecake truck for a living, just delivering dozens of cheesecakes to people who need cheesecake. pillow talk 16:13, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. per above. --Mnbvcxz 17:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC) KILL KILL KILL KILL with extreme prejudice-- 21:32, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Bah A poorly written and executed article about Masonry. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 21:35, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Mr N 22:09, Jan 29
Comments

Candy

Keep	No VFD Template As of this post I find this page to be crap but due to the fact of the lack of the VFD template I am voting keep. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[citation needed]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 02:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete	FUCKING KILL IT! ...what the hell is this? Aww hot damn, it's Sofia. Bitch at me here. ;] 02:24, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per above. --Mnbvcxz 03:10, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete It's crap. However the reason why I don't feel like putting that template on is because I fell its the responsibility of the nominator to place it there unless that page is fully protected. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[citation needed]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 21:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Yeah, my penis is candy too. <--even that was funnier than this article-- 21:34, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Mr N 22:09, Jan 29
Comments	Added template. --Mnbvcxz 03:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Daytona 500

Keep
Delete	Delete. This article sucks. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:09, 28 January 2009 (UTC) Delete 80% of it is random lists. --Mnbvcxz 15:14, 28 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Written by a NASCAR fan maybe?-- 15:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC) This Article Is Crap is not Funny I think I made edits to it just to have it fucked up by IPs so yes to deletion. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[citation needed]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 02:45, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Even Brocky thinks it sucks. -- The Colonel (talk) 20:26, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Sudan

Keep	Keep. In my opinion, racism can either be offensive or very funny, depending on how it's presented, and in this article, it's... well, not very funny, but not very offensive, either. Anyway, nothing that can't be dealt with through the normal editorial process. pillow talk 17:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Keep on Principle not that bad or that offensive. Also, I wouldn't call that racism. Worse things are said on this site about the Fat-assed Americans, crumpet-eating Limeys, skirt-wearing drunken Scots, et cetera. --Mnbvcxz 06:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC) Keep. We have worse. Slap a rewrite tag on it, perhaps. --UU - natter 13:31, Jan 28 Keep. Not that bad. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:33, 28 January 2009 (UTC) Weak Keep Per the Sockpuppet Vote Above^ --Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[citation needed]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 03:14, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Racist piece of crap Saberwolf116 17:03, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Ok, I give in. It's pretty terrible, but I slapped a liposuction template on it.Saberwolf116 15:52, 28 January 2009 (UTC) Kept. ~ 11:58, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Wu Cheng Yi

Keep	Weak keep. I took out all the red ink. Apparently, this is an article by a Singaporean about the Singaporean TV show Honour and Passion. I couldn't possibly tell if it was funny without being a Singaporean who watches Honour and Passion. Also: technically an invalid nom due to lack of {{vfd}} template. pillow talk 03:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Keep. Because Hyperbole says something sensible for a change. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Keep Formating messes can be cleaned up in just minutes. I had to clean one up above that is up for VFD because of excess template spam. It appears as I am voting keep here it has been fixed. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[citation needed]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 03:19, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Keep bandwagon keep, because that is what I do. Probably needs a "fix" template though. --Mnbvcxz 03:22, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete	delete random formatting mess. --Mnbvcxz 03:34, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	I put the tag on. --Mnbvcxz 03:52, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Kept. ~ 11:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

TailGater

Keep	Actually I kind of like it. But maybe I'm just being deceived by those nice images (which Mnbvcxz didn't categorize yet, it's fixed now). -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 11:16, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Keep has potential. --Mnbvcxz 01:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Keep A "Tail Gater" is kinda like a turd pusher, or back door gardener. Sometimes even described as a "Tail Gunner"... Mr N 01:27, Jan 26
Delete	Delete. I'm not clear on what this is supposed to be. pillow talk 10:40, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain I'm not familiar with the term, from above description just isn't a topic that would be funny to me. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 04:12, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Kept. ~ 11:50, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:Crap

Keep	Quit beating the Dead Horse It's already been kept a few times already and I have not changed my mind about it usage even tough it was deleted once. It was on VFD 4 times already each time I noted it being there my vote was keep. My rationale is it is a warning template and plus the fact it's being used on userspaces including mine. I have not changed my mind on it. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[citation needed]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 02:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC) KEEP and that this has come up AGAIN on VFD irritates the Hell out of me. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 03:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Keep. Redundant? Yes. Pointless? I think not. IronLung 08:40, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Keep. Just to make you happy TKF. ~ 16:25, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete I voted keep for when it was up at the start of the month. However, on further reflection, I think we should delete this. I don't think we should have "for userspace only" templates in the main template-space at all. All "user-space-only" templates should be in userspace. This wiki is about the mainspace articles, not userspace jibber-jabbering. Therefore, we shouldn't suffer mainspace clutter or chaos on maintenance tasks to allow userspace babbling. --Mnbvcxz 16:48, 28 January 2009 (UTC) Hellz yeah. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 00:53, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. I agree. pillow talk 01:44, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	IT is a redundant warning template, and the instructions say its only a userspace template now. (I assume that is because of an administrative ruling of the cabal) We have a {{rewrite}} template. We don't need "psuedo-rewrite" templates that do same thing, only confusingly, inconsistently, and without the auto-categorization. And I changed by mind on this one. --Mnbvcxz 03:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Comment FIRST of all, don't wave your little finger at those of us who have been around for a long while about this template. Secondly, the most irritating thing about this matter is that this template has been placed on VFD how many times (?) and it has survived. At this point whether it serves a purpose or not, I will defend it because this Nom is a PIECE OF CRAP itself. (PS, its that time of the month!) Hugs, Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 03:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC) First off, I regret voting keep last time. And, it survived last time (or at least got as many for votes as it did) because of a lack of a valid template. Second, was there a good reason for the previous consensus? (as I said before, I regret my vote on the issue) I know bringing up the same issue over and over gets annoying. However, alot of the active users now weren't around or didn't know what they were doing when the current "consensus" was formed. --Mnbvcxz 04:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC) There is NO WAY that VFD should adhere to the opinions of the past. Articles change, userbases change, opinions change, and because of this VFD should be kept elastic at all times and not be based on mere tradition, let alone user annoyance and menstruation. PP's reason to keep is about as legitimate as me saying "Yo, fuck that article Sergei Rachmaninoff, I hate Russians, their accents are annoying." Additionally, this template has NEVER been used for its intended purpose (as a warning template), only as a vehicle of space-occupying and page-uglifying. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 16:26, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Considering that this template has been voted to be kept at least 5 or six times in the past, and it not being an article and underwent not changes whatsoever, I think it's a valid reason to stop voting on it for the seventh eighth and ninth time. There is plenty of crap out there people can nominate and vote on without beating that poor horse every time. ~ 16:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC) VOTING CLOSED. And stop nominating this template. As per PP, it survived I can't count how many times in the past already. ~ 11:54, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Voting opened, 3-3 is not a quorum for keep. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 16:22, 29 January 2009 (UTC) It is when you have people nominating the bloody thing every other week. ~ 16:25, 29 January 2009 (UTC) The last time this was nominated was nearly 3 weeks ago. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 16:27, 29 January 2009 (UTC) And the matter was DECIDED three weeks ago, and even before that! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC) This should be irrelevant, anyway. If it was meant to be kept this time it should have recieved an overwhelming majority as it did the last time(s) it was nominated. However, we are deadlocked currently, so neither side has a quorum, so this remains open. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 16:32, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Oh, yeah, well I can just keep indenting my comments further in that you, Nah! Besides, now there is a quorum of four votes to save. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:34, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Slim majority is not a quorum >:\| give me 5-3 and I'll be happy. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 16:36, 29 January 2009 (UTC) You know TKF, I'd expect you to drop me a line on my talk page before reverting me, we never had problems talking before. Just a thought, I don't remember me reverting you in the past. Also, the deletion or the lack of it thereof is due to the admin doing the maintenance better judgment. I did a judgment call, you should have left it at that. ~ 16:40, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Pretzel

Keep	Keep Um, er, well, yea, hmm.... It just makes it past the keep bar for me. Mr N 21:13, Jan 26 Weak keep/rewrite Now keepable after Mr N's changes, still needs a lot of help though. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 21:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Yeah, after MrN's work, it's probably moved from VFD to {{rewrite}}. pillow talk 21:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Keep per above. --Mnbvcxz 05:54, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Pretzel is an article which is not 1. coherent; or 2. good. Delete. pillow talk 20:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Delete Take out the old George W Bush jokes and the tired swearing jokes and theres nothing left worth saving. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 21:20, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Well, I removed some of the crap. Are you sure this is not worth keeping? Mr N 21:34, Jan 26 --- Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:25, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Bad-day

Keep
Delete	Delete. A crappy article. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per above. --Mnbvcxz 16:35, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Delete Survey says?!?!........BZZZZZZZZZT-- 10:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Delete Whoever wrote this article was having a bad day. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 02:36, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. It's been a bad day, please don't take a picture. Also: Norwegian wood. (This comment now makes as much sense as the article). --UU - natter 09:16, Jan 26
Comments

Doctor What

Keep
Delete	Delete. My divorce was funnier than this. pillow talk 20:52, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Purely due to the above comment. Mr N 21:11, Jan 26 Delete. this penis-drugs-masturbation nonsense. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 21:51, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Just as bad as all those lame attempts to make "The Who" and "The Guess Who" into jokes.-- 17:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Splinter Cell

Keep
Delete	Delete. I started removing crap off this page and realized there'd be nothing left. pillow talk 20:22, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. I thought there may have been a better version in the history, but alas I could not find it... Mr N 20:33, Jan 26 Delete incoherent and stubby. --Mnbvcxz 05:45, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Bleah-- 17:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Jo Whiley

Keep
Delete	Delete. Even the "Humour" section wasn't funny. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Delete --Mnbvcxz 16:27, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Delete If you look hard enough, there's jokes hidden in there but they're under-developed and poorly executed unfortunately.-- 10:52, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Straightforward crap. --UU - natter 09:19, Jan 26 What the fuck?Saberwolf116 17:32, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments

The up against the wall motherfuckers

Keep
Delete	Delete. Largely incoherent.--Count of Monkey Crisco 22:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. I'm 43% sure this is vanity and 98% sure this is unfunny. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 23:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC) delete per above. --Mnbvcxz 01:21, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Bleah although I do like the title. pillow talk 01:27, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Hnnnng. --UU - natter 09:22, Jan 26 Delete. Kill this shit. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Orson Scott Card

Keep
Delete	Delete. Is this supposed to be funny??? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:21, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per above. --Mnbvcxz 16:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. The Hitler randomizer........always bad-- 10:57, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Yawn. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 02:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Wha?. Piffle. --UU - natter 09:14, Jan 26 Strong delete. Card deserves a far, far better article than this. I'll put it on that to-do list I never seem to get around to. pillow talk 17:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Data

Keep
Delete	Delete. Random, nothing funny about it. pillow talk 09:54, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Same author of Patrick Stewart I presume. Nice animated gif (control-click-save as)-- 10:47, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per above. --Mnbvcxz 22:11, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Delete Mr N 01:32, Jan 26 Delete. Believe the Hype. --UU - natter 09:20, Jan 26 Delete. A waste of data. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Patrick Stewart

Keep
Delete	Delete. An unredeemable shitstorm of random. pillow talk 10:11, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. It was finally over when I got to Godzilla and Chuck Norris-- 10:40, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 21:54, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. and redirect to Captain Picard --Mnbvcxz 22:20, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Not sure about the re-direct myself. Maybe a different article for the character and person is in order. Mr N 01:31, Jan 26
Comments	Make it so? Mr N 01:31, Jan 26

Robert Fico

Keep
Delete	Delete. This article sucks. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:17, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per above. --Mnbvcxz 16:20, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Another biography written by manatees. -- 11:13, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Per the "sucks" issue. Mr N 00:37, Jan 26 Delete. Nonsensical, not funny. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 02:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Chad Ocho Cinco

Keep
Delete	Delete. I failed to find anything funny in this article. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:42, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Randumb, which is only slightly less bad than the fact that there's a real person with this name/nickname. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 13:05, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per above. --Mnbvcxz 16:17, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. If it weren't for random names, there would be no links at all.-- 11:16, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Mr N 00:35, Jan 26
Comments

Ruby Tuesday

Keep
Delete	Delete short, unfunny, incoherent, random. --Mnbvcxz 17:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC) Delete Well, it's obviously about the Rolling Stones song... Still pants though. Mr N 21:02, Jan 22 Meh is all I have to say about this. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:05, 22 January 2009 (UTC) Delete Is there a unit of measurement smaller than a stub?-- 11:23, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Delort Goodbye 2005cruft, goodbye. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 23:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	But maybe Prettiestpretty could make something nice of it? Maybe? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 11:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Image:Viceland.jpg

Keep
Delete	delete only on one page, and that is a list of unused images. borders on E.D. style imagery. I think this is below our standards. --Mnbvcxz 01:16, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	T'was an orphan, essentially, so I huffed it. Bush was the decidicator. I'm the deletifier. He clears brush on his ranch. I set stuff on fire. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:17, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

UnNews:Barack Obama assassinated. Robert Gates sworn in as 44th president.

Keep	Keep Sorry you don't like it PP. I agree it's in bad taste, but we have much worse, and I can see a number of people finding this funny. I think we have to allow it. Also, it's obviously too new and such to be here really. It may also improve... Mr N 01:42, Jan 23 Keep. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 02:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC) Keep on Principle For one, its an invalid nomination, article too new. Second, this is no where near disturbing. --Mnbvcxz 05:39, 23 January 2009 (UTC) Keep. Yes, the idea is disturbing, but hopefully a little insertion of nonsense might make it a tad less disturbing(adds details like weapon and where were the secret service). Topics like incest and rape are also disturbing, but there are jokes about those.-- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 06:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Not funny How someone could consider writing about this topic is disturbing. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 23:15, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 死. This page should be deleted. Not funny, per PP. \|Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Man on Fire CUN\|IC Kill \| 09:46, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	I agree that it's not really funny, though it's an obvious subject. There were/are actually some stupid shits planning to assassinate Obama. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC) Comment While this looks to be on the way to NOT being removed, I just want to reiterate that I do not think that its parody, humor, satire or smart to have something like this on the site. There are enough crack pots in the world enough, and I live in a country where blacks were lynched for the smallest of infractions (whistling at white women, just merely walking the planet, even) in the deep south within my lifetime. AND I would as upset with this if it were written about anyone else. Racial parody and satire are one thing because they skewer "sacred cows", however assassination of any human isn't an opporunity for humor, no matter how dark it may be. This one crosses the line for me fellas, and sets off all sorts of bad Krama. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:46, 23 January 2009 (UTC) Special pleading. This site has tons of Jew-killing jokes and the like. --Mnbvcxz 16:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC) The article itself is completely absurd (Joe Biden killing Barack Obama?) and it just mocks the idea of Robert Gates becoming president, as he was the so-called "designated successor". -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:28, 23 January 2009 (UTC) We already have articles on Murder, Assassination, and National Try To Assassinate The President Day. They may not be in great taste, but they are already on here. Whether it is a good idea depends on how willing one is to push the envelope, which is part of humor, and free speech. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 23:53, 23 January 2009 (UTC) Speedy (if somewhat delayed) keep. Invalid nom. Too new. QVFD would be more appropriate (and I wouldn't delete it if it appeared there, as it's not bad with the "loaded banana" additon. It's not great, but it's not crap). There are way more offensive pages on Uncyc than this.Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 11:45, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Shitland

Keep	Keep: Per salvage operations by PP-- 21:39, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Keep: Finally, I have found a use for Belgium! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:54, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Keep per above. --Mnbvcxz 15:45, 16 January 2009 (UTC) Keep it, but it needs to be fixed quickly. This needs a rewrite. \|Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Man on Fire CUN\|IC Kill \| 09:18, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Keep. PP does it again, although it could still stand a bit more work. --UU - natter 10:12, Jan 20 K33P If only because UU said "PP does it again"... Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 21:08, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. The only amusing thing about this is that it has somehow survived for so long. Flush it into the sewers and make sure you wipe yourself. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 13:37, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per above. --Mnbvcxz 15:04, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Redirect to Belgium. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:11, 15 January 2009 (UTC) ~~Hold on....I have an idea. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)~~ Still Delete. Belgium's article sucks. This really needs some major rewriting. As it is now, it could just as well be redirected to Belgium. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:29, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Comment Boy o' boy this whole mess has reminded me what a piece of shit the article on Belgium is itself. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:02, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Keept -RA HB 10:15, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:President

Keep	Keep For nostalgia's sake. Anyone remember After Cheese? --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 21:06, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. I removed this template from the articles in which it was legacycruft. There were a few articles where the fake presidency was the main focus of the article. Not surprisingly, all of those article are quite random and unfunny. I'd think we'd be better off sending this template to hell with the page. P.s. VFD template is on the talk page, the main page is protected. --Mnbvcxz 17:41, 11 January 2009 (UTC) p.s. THIS IS THE MYTHICAL PRESIDENTS TEMPLATE!!! not the real us presidents template, that one is {{USpresident}} --Mnbvcxz 05:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC) Delete This serves no purpose but to make ninth grade boys giggle. IT NEEDS TO GO! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:32, 13 January 2009 (UTC) I imagine the same could be said about those puffy bloomers you're wearing. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 21:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC) Nice girls never show their Flashdrive. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:11, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 15:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. What purpose does this serve anyway?.....oh right, above :P-- dagrimdialer619 ^1336.999992 05:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. I have never seen the point of this, and I'm happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter 10:11, Jan 20 Delete. Mr N 20:59, Jan 22 Meh. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC) Delete, and I'll huff this as soon as someone substs this template in where it's used in userspace and the like. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 23:42, Jan 22 Done. Huff away Led... Mr N 01:27, Jan 23
Comments	Why is there no VFD template on this page? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:04, 13 January 2009 (UTC) The template page is protected from editing. Therefore, the VFD template goes on the talk page. --Mnbvcxz 05:57, 14 January 2009 (UTC) All right then. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

The Russian Revolution

Keep
Delete	Delete. No significant work has been done to this in almost a year and a half, and its ugly. I don't like ugly things. ^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell • Latest literary excretion) __ 20:03, 19 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. per above, and there is a real article on the subject. Redirect maybe? --Mnbvcxz 05:51, 20 January 2009 (UTC Delete. Redirect to Russian Revolution of 1917. --UU - natter 10:20, Jan 20
Comments	Redirected - As per suggestion. --Sir gwax (talk) 01:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Formal Language

Keep	Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:17, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Keep. not the best article on the subject, but it still has some value. --Mnbvcxz 17:40, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete very messy and unfunny, very pointless--Tagstit 06:23, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:23, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Oh, meta. Bad meta, complete with memes and random. Really don't see the point, myself. --UU - natter 10:15, Jan 20
Comments	Invalid - no VFD template. Voting closed. ~ 08:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Ancient Chinese Medicine

Keep	Keep. - This isn't great, but it is not deletion worthy in my view.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:23, 16 January 2009 (UTC) Keep per Sycamore. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:32, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Keep per above. --Mnbvcxz 17:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC) Keep I rather like it. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC) Keep. It's alright. --UU - natter 10:13, Jan 20
Delete	Just a rambling wall of text, no pictures, not funny --Tagstit 04:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per above. --Mnbvcxz 15:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. ~ 08:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC) AND ACTUALLY there was no VFD tag on the page. ~ 08:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

JNNN TV Anda/Homepage

Keep	Keep. It's a subpage. Also, the author is still around. Mr N 04:28, Jan 10 Keep per above. --Mnbvcxz 19:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC) Keep. Seriously, do we really need to delete this? \|Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Man on Fire CUN\|IC Kill \| 09:22, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Keep. Eh. --UU - natter 10:10, Jan 20
Delete	Delete NRV and it makes my eyes bleed. IronLung 04:16, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. This page is so hard to read, I can't tell whether or not it's worth keeping. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 03:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC) Revise. It's supposed to be hard to read, it's a parody of a stupid website. I think we should just revise it and make it look sexier. ;D Plus, we should realign some of the ads and fix some of the less funny jokes. Aww hot damn, it's Sofia. Bitch at me here. ;] 00:24, 15 January 2009 (UTC) REMINDER AND COMMENT: It's not a parody of a stupid website, it's a made up website that is supposed to parody the BBC Homepage! Above all, I tried to fix it, and make it look more like BBC and less like the Al-Qaeda Homepage. \|Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Man on Fire CUN\|IC Kill \| 09:22, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 12 days, keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:03, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Fuckadoodledoo

Keep
Delete	HUFF-A-DOODLE-DOO! This is crap. Aww hot damn, it's Sofia. Bitch at me here. ;] 21:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Invalid. Check out UN:DEL. This article is too new... Mr N 22:14, Jan 21 ICU expired; I have deleted the article. --Sir gwax (talk) 01:15, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Pwning

Keep
Delete	This article needs to be pwned. And maybe someone could redirect it to Pwn. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC) delete and redirect to pwn. --Mnbvcxz 18:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC) delete and redirect Mr N 20:19, Jan 21
Comments	Deleted and redirected --Sir gwax (talk) 01:17, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

British Revolution

Keep
Delete	Delete. Mainly lists, and if those were stripped out, what's left isn't worth saving, to my eyes. Not linked from anywhere, really don't see the point in it. Get rid. --UU - natter 11:25, Jan 21 Move it to HowNotTo:Bullet List. Just joking - Nuke it. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 12:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC) per above its basically a list with some template spam at the top. --Mnbvcxz 12:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Deleted - On account of the fact that I hate lists and like deleting so much. --Sir gwax (talk) 01:24, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:Confederacy

Keep
Delete	Delete a random sectional template used on only one page. (And that page is a list of templates for Oscar Wilde's sake!) This sort of crap has the potential to generate historical nonsense over all the place. --Mnbvcxz 07:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. What the fuck? Utterly pointless template. --UU - natter 10:10, Jan 21 Delete Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 12:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Deleted - In point of technicality, it was an unused template. --Sir gwax (talk) 01:25, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Manele

Keep
Delete	Delete. It's a page full of lists and one large image that the average English person can't read. I personally don't find the article to be funny. - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 06:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. per above. --Mnbvcxz 06:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Listy, dull. --UU - natter 10:08, Jan 21
Comments	Deleted - Even understanding what is trying to be said, this article is not funny and does not deserve to live. --Sir gwax (talk) 01:33, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

The year 2200

Keep
Delete	Delete. 2200 sucks. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:13, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 13:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC) delete per above. --Mnbvcxz 17:37, 18 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Mr N 22:44, Jan 19 Delete. Short 'n' shit. --UU - natter 10:18, Jan 20
Comments

Samuel L. Vacuum

Keep	Strongest Possible Keep this is funny. The article is about the pompous justification of the sentence. In fact, I'm considering nominating this on VFH when the queue goes down a bit.--Mnbvcxz 07:50, 15 January 2009 (UTC) You have got to be kidding me. I'm noticing a trend here, finding a single situation as ripe for comedy despite depth. It's OK as a keep but VFH?? You're advocating VFD material as VFH while being articulate seems to get quick against votes from you. I'm OK with keeping but......-- 21:13, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Keep. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 15:07, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Quite good, quite good. A certain monkey did a good job rewriting it. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 20:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC) THIS ARTICLE IS MADE OF WIN MIXED WITH ULTRAPWNSAUCE Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 21:36, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Alright, keep it. Someone rewrote it, it's okay now. Aww hot damn, it's Sofia. Bitch at me here. ;] 03:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC) Leave the motherfucking motherfucker alone! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete.. The whole thing isn't really an article. It just goes on and on about that one sentence. --Meganew (POST NOW!!!) 14:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC) ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! I AM TIRED OF ALL THIS MOTHERFUCKING SHIT ON THE MOTHERFUCKING UNCYCLOPEDIA! This is crap. Aww hot damn, it's Sofia. Bitch at me here. ;] 00:16, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	There Mnbvcxz, I added it as a userspace page. --Meganew (POST NOW!!!) 15:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Kept. ~ 22:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Peter Jennings

Keep
Delete	Just a mess, horrible format, not funny --Tagstit 04:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per above. --Mnbvcxz 15:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:23, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:18, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 13:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Click

Keep
Delete	It's a piece of crap. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:09, 15 January 2009 (UTC) BZZZZZT! -- 22:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per above. --Mnbvcxz 15:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:16, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 13:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Is redirecting to Click Here a possibility? --Pentium5dot1\|t~^_^~c 00:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC) Redirect'd. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:22, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Star Ocean: Till the End of Time

Keep
Delete	Delete as nominator. Overly factual gamecruft - the only thing the article has going for it is length. It just isn't hitting my funny bone. --Pentium5dot1\|t~^_^~c 21:11, 14 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per above. --Mnbvcxz 07:52, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 15:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:14, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 13:49, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Bub

Keep
Delete	Delete as nominator. The poor condition of the article should be obvious upon a first glance, and it hasn't been edited at all in a little over a year (also, look at how old the talk page comment is...) --Pentium5dot1\|t~^_^~c 21:11, 14 January 2009 (UTC) KILL I think I just Got Some Sick in my mouth. Aww hot damn, it's Sofia. Bitch at me here. ;] 00:21, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per above. One paragraph of text! How did that survive that long? --Mnbvcxz 07:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 15:04, 15 January 2009 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:34, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Awesomeness

Keep
Delete	This page is far from awesome! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:29, 12 January 2009 (UTC) Delete How many half-baked, stale jokes can we fit on one page? More importantly, how can something be stale and yet only half-baked? --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 06:03, 13 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. A list of numbers, followed by not very much? Get rid. --UU - natter 09:26, Jan 13 KILL THE FUCKER! KILL IT! Don't make us suffer from this article anymore. Reading this increased my chance of Getting Some Sick by 50%. :( Aww hot damn, it's Sofia. Bitch at me here. ;] 02:50, 14 January 2009 (UTC) Procedural Delete as broken redirect; see below. --Pentium5dot1\|t~^_^~c 21:41, 16 January 2009 (UTC) This vote was in error; see my comment below for further explanation. --Pentium5dot1\|t~^_^~c 21:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	abstain I don't get the VFD feeling on this, maybe its the irony of the Awesomeness article sucking so much. --Mnbvcxz 05:38, 13 January 2009 (UTC) A pointless redirect to Boobs. Yawn. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 02:44, 16 January 2009 (UTC) MY TWO CENTS ON THIS SHIT. Oh, looks like someone deleted all the shit and made it a redirect to "boobs". Someone delete the redirect and write a good article on awesomeness. Aww hot damn, it's Sofia. Bitch at me here. ;] 03:55, 16 January 2009 (UTC) Abstain~~, but note that Boobs has now been undeleted (its deletion seems to have been a mistake). --Pentium5dot1\|t~^_^~c 17:11, 16 January 2009 (UTC)~~ Oops, it seems to have been deleted again. (I don't think it should have, but oh well.) --Pentium5dot1\|t~^_^~c 21:41, 16 January 2009 (UTC) ...and Awesomeness has been retargeted to HowTo:Be Awesome. --Pentium5dot1\|t~^_^~c 21:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC) Closed, before it causes any more mixups and drama. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 01:02, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Smug

Keep	Weak Keep some base material, not a total waste of space. --Mnbvcxz 15:41, 7 January 2009 (UTC) Seriously, If you like this joke watch South Park. It has no business as an article here. So is this VFH material too?-- 22:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Keep Per that one guy who forgot to eat his vowels. Or did eat them. Whichever is worse. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 21:04, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. -- 08:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC) Romartus 09:44, 7 January 2009 (UTC). Delete. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 14:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC) Nevermind DrStrange is right. It's too unoriginal. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 21:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. My least favorite thing on Uncyclopedia: unfunny renditions of funny television. pillow talk 18:37, 9 January 2009 (UTC) DIE! Stealing jokes from TV and putting them on uncyc = The worst thing ever. Aww hot damn, it's Sofia. Bitch at me here. ;] 00:26, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. I hate South Park. But the reason for this vote is plagiarism. -RA HB 22:48, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	The concept of smug applied to smog is the basis of South Park Episode 1002 "Smug Alert". Already, it's highly derivative coming out the gate. Then, it goes on to follow the episode with San Francisco and Hybrid cars!! It doesn't get easier than this, it's plagiarism!!-- 08:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC) Smug Alert synopsis from wikipee.-- 09:29, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

St Richards Catholic College

Keep
Delete	A bunch of idiots are trying do delete with them. While I don't agree to their way of working, I agree that it is garbage. ~ 20:58, 14 January 2009 (UTC) Delete post haste. Observe my comment below --Nytrospawn 21:15, 14 January 2009 (UTC) D1337 As per nytrospawn, and what was said on IRC. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 21:32, 14 January 2009 (UTC) KILL IT FOR THE SAKE OF ALL OF US! It's unfunny, full of overdone jokes, and is overall vanity. But I think we should contact his school and tell them about it anyways. People who make crappy articles deserve to be expelled. Aww hot damn, it's Sofia. Bitch at me here. ;] 00:07, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Incidentally, his school already knows, and is currently bitching at him in a bout of obnoxious British censorship, along with his parents. Apparently he was also drunk at the time of writing. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 00:26, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Author of the article contacted me, stating that his school career was in jeopardy if this article wasnt deleted. I deleted it ,as I took sympathy on the poor sod, for being a Catholic school boy,being drunk,being British,and posting on Uncyclopedia. Please redelete as I dont want his parents sueing Uncyclopedia for their kid being a retard--Nytrospawn 21:15, 14 January 2009 (UTC) As it turns out, another article is being started on the apparent fascism of said school in question. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 21:32, 14 January 2009 (UTC) This is the Mister Winkler saga all over again. First, I wouldn't believe any one that comes online and claims something will happen if something else wouldn't happen. Also, I don't think he created this article. And lastly, if we deleted everything that we're asked just out of the blue, we might as well start purging the whole site. Having said that, the article is a pile of crap. ~ 23:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC) We shouldn't be afraid of a lawsuit for this sort of stuff. We stood up to Pr. Video for crying out loud. And another thing, this article was deleted only 5 hours 2 minutes after it was nominated. --Mnbvcxz 06:24, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Manches

Keep
Delete	Delete. I, uh, what? Been here since 2006, but nothing links to it, and it makes no sense. --UU - natter 09:49, Jan 10 Delete. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 16:39, 10 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. IronLung 18:02, 10 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per above. --Mnbvcxz 19:09, 10 January 2009 (UTC) I'M WITH STUPID » This is extremely unfunny. Aww hot damn, it's Sofia. Bitch at me here. ;] 00:19, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Ninja ball

Keep
Delete	Delete. Odd, short ICU escapist, nothing links to it, and it's kinda dumb. --UU - natter 10:04, Jan 10 Delete. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 16:37, 10 January 2009 (UTC) delete per above. --Mnbvcxz 19:05, 10 January 2009 (UTC) Delete I think this could probably have been put on QVFD with an "ICU abuse" comment. Tis pants... Mr N 00:23, Jan 12 Delete Where I come from, it's called soccer. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 21:13, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Richard Petty

Keep
Delete	Delete. Most of the article is copied from Wikipedia --Kurgan's Back. Prepare to get pwned. (Unless you are Chuck Norris) 21:36, 9 January 2009 (UTC) delete. Uh, yeah - by you, right? So is this an author request for deletion? Whatever, if it's not gonna get better, it might as well go. --UU - natter 09:10, Jan 10 Delete. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 16:45, 10 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. You could have put this on QVFD as you created it and want it deleted. Mr N 17:04, Jan 12
Comments	Abstain probably something savable, as per the "length of crap" argument. --Mnbvcxz 19:30, 10 January 2009 (UTC)