Uncyclopedia:VFH/HowTo:Breathe

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

HowTo:Breathe (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: HowTo:Breathe	Score: 17 breaths of fresh air
Nominated by:	~ NEZLR 01:24, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
For: 25	For. I like it. ~ NEZLR 01:24, 27 July 2009 (UTC) For It actually made me laugh. Needs some work with formatting and grammar, though. Staircase CUNt 05:48, 27 July 2009 (UTC) I like it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:13, 27 July 2009 (UTC) Bless. It had an "I am dead" section that didn't link to You are dead. 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 16:24,27July,2009 for. sure. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC) For. 119.12.185.81 00:59, 28 July 2009 (UTC) For. 70.254.68.216 02:27, 28 July 2009 (UTC) For. A bit confused at times, but still good. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 19:29, 28 July 2009 (UTC) For. Good stuff. InMooseWeTrust 20:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC) For. --Docile hippopotamus 00:04, 29 July 2009 (UTC) Weak For, only because it didn't really need all those "tip" sections. They could have been written normally. Also, the certificate thing was weird. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:10, Jul 30 Weak for. It's a good idea and is definitely funny, but the article needs some cleanup and probably some funny diagrams. Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 05:56, Jul. 31, 2009 For. At last advice I can follow. --Sog1970 16:35, 2 August 2009 (UTC) For. It's the kind of article that should be featured. Fewer in-joke articles and more original and amusing articles are what would attract more potential funnymakers to this site. -- El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 16:47, 2 August 2009 (UTC) For. Just. It gets a bit ugly towards the bottom, was overall pretty funny. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 13:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC) For. Has enough to keep a reader interested and is pretty reasonably well written without ending in SHOUTY CAPS. Has my vote. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 05:54, 4 August 2009 (UTC) For. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:54, 4 August 2009 (UTC) For. But I didn't laugh, mind you. Style  Guide 19:08, 10 August 2009 (UTC) For. Could use some slight proofreading, but I like it. SilentScreaming 09:44, 12 August 2009 (UTC) Self-for. --Sir Xiao Li CUN VFH NS (Talk) For. hahahahaha! Criselnox 11:41, 17 August 2009 (UTC)  I am dead what do I do? GBA2005 (talk) Join Us 17:26, 18 August 2009 (UTC) For. --—Mazaka (talk) 05:18, 19 August 2009 (UTC) For. Take a breather. NaturalBornKieler (talk) 07:16, 19 August 2009 (UTC)  For. Ooops... thgouht I'd done did this! Pup t 09:07, 19/08/2009 For. The Shit - - - Pie+Muffin = Greatness Barf- + -Observe 13:57, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Against: 8	Against. Still can't breathe. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 05:46, 27 July 2009 (UTC) Against. Too much just to know how to breathe. And yes I have a fucking sense of humor! HolyUncyclopediaAccountBatman! 22:09, 27 July 2009 (UTC) Your vote doesn't make much sense. Are you voting against it just because it was too long? Staircase CUNt 22:18, 27 July 2009 (UTC) Against. Naw. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:02, 30 July 2009 (UTC) Meh. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 20:08, 30 July 2009 (UTC) Against. I don't think so ChiefjusticeDS 21:14, 30 July 2009 (UTC) Against. It seems to be a rather awkward article. It also mentions kitten huffing. -- inept Ape (program) (Riot Porn) 02:05, 31 July 2009 (UTC) Against. Worked in places, didn't in others, needs a bit more polish. It's not bad at all, but neither is it as good as it should be. --UU - natter 09:29, Aug 10  Against. Sir MacMania GUN—[12:23 17 Aug 2009]
Comments	Abstain. This is a good article, but It's not quite brilliant Featured material. Dorsalfrog Prime 16:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC) What's a cantelope?. 202.69.186.245 06:47, 28 July 2009 (UTC) A cantelope is like an antelope but not so fast. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 05:51, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.