Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive171

Pernambuco

Keep	Rewrite tag. I'd like to see an article that's actually about Pernambuco, but I'm inclined to believe this is still slightly better than nothing at all. I was marginally amused. pillow talk 20:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Keep I don't think it's offensive enough to delete. MrN 18:26, Feb 4 Just good enough to keep. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Keep per above, changed my mind. --S'r Mnbvcxz 03:33, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Keep An amusing little page. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 19:27, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:53, Feb 2 delete random as hell. --S'r Mnbvcxz 05:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC) delete i say. random enough for me. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	kept. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 04:02, Feb 7

Battle of Brisbane

Keep	Keep Well, rather enjoyed reading it, so decided to fix it up a bit. I think this article is an excellent example of Bullshit being used to spectacular effect. As such, I added the {{Some Bullshit}} template (which is also on VFD). Hopefully this article illustrates the important difference between crap and bullshit... MrN 12:15, Feb 2 Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. lapsed into deletionism for a second. --S'r Mnbvcxz 16:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Okay, I guess it wasn't that bad after all. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Keep Per Mr N's improvements. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 19:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. This article is completely lacking in humour. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 11:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC) delete --S'r Mnbvcxz 15:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Random garbage. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 18:31, Feb 2 delete. eh. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Oh, don't forget to add the {{VFD}} Sockpuppet... :-) MrN 12:16, Feb 2 Cept. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:20, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Neo-Confusionism

Keep
Delete	Delete sectional template. Its not bad, but it is "link rotted" beyond salvation. But, its not quite link rotted enough for QVFD. --Mnb'z 16:03, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Delete Link Rot is bad for your health. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 18:53, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Delete MrN 21:40, Feb 7 EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:08, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. More red than blue. Random. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:44, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Geordie

Keep
Delete	Delete I think this "written by" template needs an "Overly British" warning template. It might be ok as code substitution, but it serious doesn't need to be a template. --Mnb'z 05:42, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Strong Delete WTF is this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 07:00, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. A "Mackem hating Geordie" is an individual from the north east of England who has a particular aversion to people from the area of Manchester. The fact that you don't understand it is part of the humour. I will subst it onto the two articles... MrN 13:28, Feb 7 Delete. This is rubbish. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Bicameral

Keep	Keep So? It's still a good idea, and that pic is awesome. MrN 04:13, Feb 6 Keep its stubby, but not horrible. Also, it was kept twice before. --Mnb'z 05:46, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Keep per above. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:09, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. Two prior VFD nominations and still a good article. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:14, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete this. Two prior VFD nominations and no improvements in the meantime. IronLung 03:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Semispeedy kept. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:21, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Mama Luigi

Keep	NO The author is still around. He edited it today. This article needs LOTS of work, but I will not support deleting something which just recently survived QVFD, and ICU which has an active author. That {{fix}} which I put on this article was working just fine. No need to VFD something like this... MrN 00:11, Feb 5 Honestly, having read the article, I think the best assistance we could give that author would be to hand him a nice, clean, unsullied blank page from which to work. pillow talk 00:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Is it really that bad? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Yes. Look at my username. That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario! 15:05, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Keep author still active. I believe the fix template is appropriate here. The VFD is not supposed to be double jeopardy after an ICU survival. Also, deleting somebody's work doesn't help them. --S'r Mnbvcxz 02:05, 5 February 2009 (UTC) weak keep. give it time, i guess. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Keep/ICU -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 19:23, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete Unfunny crap full of bad grammar and spelling. That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario! 20:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Yes We Can delete this article. pillow talk 22:24, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Keept -RAHB 21:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Some Bullshit

Keep	Keep Hmm. Well, it's saying the article needs more bullshit. Normal traditional (un-specified) crap we don't want, but there is always room for more bullshit on Uncyclopedia. Reading the template did make me giggle a little bit, and I don't think this template has the same potentially damaging effects as some of the others which have been nominated recently. Many will no doubt consider this vote horse shit, which you may know is slightly thicker in consistency. MrN 01:10, Feb 2 Keep Per Above I have to agree this is one of the better ones. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 05:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Keep -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 16:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Convinced by MrN in the forums. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 18:27, Feb 3 Good enough. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete perverse instruction template. It tells the reader to add more nonsense to an article. --S'r Mnbvcxz 20:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Another inferior clone of Factual. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 18:29, Feb 2 Delete Such templates should be "cut to the chase", this one is to large, too long and too much effort to look through at a quick glance. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP•
Comments	I added a disclaimer on the end to take some of the risk of misunderstanding out of it. Alot of depends on what you define as "bullshit". And, I think this still runs the risk of being misunderstood and being taken as a "foul this up even moar" template. Therefore, I'm sticking with my "delete" vote. --S'r Mnbvcxz 16:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC) I'm not bullshitting you dude: As with many expletives, it can be used as an interjection (or in many other parts of speech) and can carry a wide variety of meanings. Most commonly, it is used in connection with incorrect, misleading, or false language and statements. While the word is generally used in a deprecating sense, it may imply a measure of respect for language skills, or frivolity, among various other benign usages. In my experience the vast majority of Uncyc users are well versed in the finer points of bullshit, and the art are bullshiting. Also... Bullshit is actually a good article, and I might just try and get that bullshit featured sometime soon... :-) MrN 17:33, Feb 2 Abstain it looks like MrN9000 is trying to save this, and is willing to put forth some effort. I torn between my general anti-deletionism and my template deletionism. --S'r Mnbvcxz 18:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Keept -RAHB 09:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Random Twatdar

Keep
Delete	Delete I believe this at one time was a maintenance template of some kind. However, it is insulting, confusing, little used, and really doesn't do much. Its basically an arcane version of Template:Forever lousy, which itself isn't my favorite type of maintenance template to begin with. --S'r Mnbvcxz 16:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Like, WTF? pillow talk 18:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC) WTF? WTF is a Twat? It's a friggin Red Link so I can't get the joke.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) Delete This is a twat, no clue what twatdar is. That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario! 19:26, 5 February 2009 (UTC) delete. useless. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:39, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Fallout

Keep
Delete	Delete is this a meaningless comment template? Or is it trying to be some sort of maintenance template? Either way, its way too big and confusing and/or corny. If its supposed to do something, (what ever that something is) a blank slate would be better starting point for a re-write and re-name than this. --S'r Mnbvcxz 02:31, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. This template is stupid and gay and retarted. pillow talk 03:29, 5 February 2009 (UTC) More like FAILOUT It's only "good" on one article. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 03:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Delete or redirict to Failout per above. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 05:51, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Delete No purpose, and they spelled "nucular" wrong. That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario! 15:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC) delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Comment Some of these templates on VFD seem to be only a couple of weeks old. What's with the sudden influx of template spam? --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 03:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC) I don't think we are getting an "influx" of bad templates, you'll have some old, some real old, and some new crap on VFD at any given time. --S'r Mnbvcxz 04:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Corn puppies

Keep	Keep. That I'm no panty-ass liberal doesn't mean that I should vote "Delete" for just about anything. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Rewrite. It's notable subject matter. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 18:27, Feb 2
Delete	Delete.Kind of the archetypal bad Uncyclopedia article: just throw up templates and random nonsense until you're delighted by the fact that you've created something that resembles an article. pillow talk 20:39, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. I don't think it's fixable. MrN 21:15, Jan 26 Delete. So I'm reading this thinking it isn't bad and then I get to the second section where they start the old in fake year thing and bring the poor Martians into it. Fuck that shit. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 20:52, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. per above. --Mnbvcxz 01:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Wha? --UU - natter 10:29, Feb 2 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC) delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:53, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	I removed all the templates and the lists out of the history section. Still needs a rewrite to remove all the GW Bush jokes. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 22:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Warren G

Keep
Delete	Delete Unfunny leftovers from 2006. That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario! 20:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Indeed, I see no reason for this to continue to exist. pillow talk 22:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Delete Close, but yea... MrN 00:04, Feb 5 Am I detecting some deletionism here? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Delete and maybe redirect to Warren G. Harding --S'r Mnbvcxz 02:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Templates

Keep	Keep on UserPages IF you feel this needs deleted please Subst to those userpages it is on. Otherwise my vote is keep per it's only being used on userspaces. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 02:47, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Substituting is not a problem with a bot. --Mnbvcxz 03:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Keep. No issue with keeping that mainspaced for usage on userpages. ~ 11:56, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Strong delete it is slightly funny on some userpages. But, we seriously don't need "foul this article up NOW" templates. --Mnbvcxz 05:53, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. If I wanted that kind of template, I'd make one special for myself.--    17:03, 27 January 2009 (UTC) "Getting rid of this will force us to get off our asses for once" is a horrible reason to abstain. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:44, 28 January 2009 (UTC) Delete this rubbish. --Docile hippopotamus 05:42, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Delete MrN9001 will subst it onto the user pages if required. I don't like the message that it's a good idea to spam templates around like this. MrN 01:19, Feb 1 D'leet • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 18:28, Feb 2 EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. The template doesn't appear on any articles. Since it's our policy not to remove anything from userpages, we'd have to transclude it onto all the userpages and then delete it. And that sounds like a lot of work for questionable benefit. pillow talk 17:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Code copying isn't that hard with a bot. Also, I'm getting sort of hesitant on the "don't delete templates that are on userpages" theory. Templates are subject to editing; so by using a template, the author of the userpage is subjecting that userpage to minor editing by others. I think maybe a policy of template removal and the creation a "code archive" for deleted temlates might be a better solution if code copying gets to vexatious. Of course, like I said before, code copying isn't that hard. Also, this type of template does have the potential to generate alot of trouble of several articles, more so than any horribly bad article. The perverse instruction templates (like this) and bullshit succession list templates (like {{Presidents}} are probably the only things that can create chaos over the whole wiki. --Mnbvcxz 18:32, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Comment This template reminds me of accuracy dispute. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 17:20, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:TomHanks

Keep
Delete	Delete this template confuses me. Is it a "fix this" template asking the author to actually simplify the article, a "this article contains complex statements warning" or a "this article contains Tom Hanks" comment template. If we want a template that does any of those things clearly, then this isn't that one we want. --S'r Mnbvcxz 14:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Tom Hanks is not a meme. pillow talk 16:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Meh --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 17:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Delete MrN 18:20, Feb 4 EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:23, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Delete That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario! 20:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Black_holes

Keep	Strong Keep As the template is already doing its job. It fooled Mnbvcxz making him go into a black hole and making him think there's no text in the template. XD!!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 07:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete says nothing. Literally. No text, except in one of the images. And, its at 100% width. Ok, it says some stuff, but nothing meaningful. It might be funny in one or two places, but does it really need to exist as a template? --S'r Mnbvcxz 05:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. I am absolutely unimpressed that we've been "fooled" into thinking there isn't some unfunny, pointless garbled English on the template. The pictures look bad, and while the template has words on it, it contains no information. Fuck it. Fuck it in its stupid fucking template ass. pillow talk 16:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Delete It's useless and ugleh. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 17:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Delete MrN 18:21, Feb 4 EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:23, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Delete Crappy template, no use whatsoever. That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario! 20:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Template:You Lose

Keep
Delete	Delete we really shouldn't have these "insult" templates. We already have the fix and several re-write templates, and this is too nasty to be turned into a rewrite template. --S'r Mnbvcxz 15:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Delete Not a good template. MrN 16:58, Feb 3 Delete. I fucking hate Haitians. pillow talk 17:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Delete, Pronto This template has failed utterly to meet Uncyclopedia's standard of greatness, by a mile. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 17:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Strong Delete Even though this exists primarily in User Spaces the fact that it is pure insult (Violates our No Cyberbulling POlicy)is reason alone for deletion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 07:28, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 12:20, 4 February 2009 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:24, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Delete Not needed. That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario! 20:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Forgot

Keep
Delete	Delete a typical "insult" template. Basically, its like a rewrite template, except it doesn't put the article in a rewrite category, and it insults the author. --S'r Mnbvcxz 06:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Delete Per the backwards typing chap. MrN 06:24, Feb 3 Delete. I fucking hate Haitians. pillow talk 07:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Delete I can't think of any use for this. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 17:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Delete That is bad. Besides the image caused me to have a headache. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 07:29, 4 February 2009 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! As if it still existed. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:24, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Jordan Maxon

Keep
Delete	This shit is vain shit. EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 01:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Speedy delete. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Woohoo! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 01:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Homer Eat

Keep
Delete	Delete Only one article, and its not funny their. I was almost going to orphanize then QVFD, but, I don't want to go overboard in my jihad against templates. Oh, and this one has a re-direct called Template:Homer Eating --Mnbvcxz 01:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Delete I thought it worked on the doughnut page, so I subst it. MrN 01:16, Feb 1 Weak Weak Very Weak Delete but move it to my userspace Even though I like the template I had subst on my sandbox so it won't be lost. I wouldn't mind having this version moved to User:Sawblade5/Homer Eat so the edit history doesn't die with it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 04:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter 10:32, Feb 2 Delete and maybe move this to Sawblade's userspace. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 11:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

:Category:Voldemort's Weapons

Keep	Strong Keep It is indeed mildy amusing but the template SPAM there has ruin it so I am gonna take the bold step and clean up that mess. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 03:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Rewrite --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 21:52, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Keep. - There are some very good reasons for this.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. It's very rare that I think deleting a well used category is a good idea. MrN 12:47, Feb 2 Keep. per above. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 16:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Pointless template spam + absolutely no reason for any articles in this category to be in this category + absolutely no reason for this category to exist = delete. pillow talk 20:27, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Bye-bye. IronLung 08:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC) D1337 Slap a redirect to George W. Bush up on this bitch. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 21:43, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per my new theory of getting rid of template spam, even if the template was funny in that one article. --Mnbvcxz 06:29, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	unsure its mildly amusing. And, there are worse categories. --Mnbvcxz 05:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:34, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Who?

Keep
Delete	Delete Archived & obsolete maintenance template. We should really delete these things when they go obsolete, and put their code in some archive so some noob doesn't accidentally use them. --S'r Mnbvcxz 02:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Delete It's old and not funny. Why is everyone looking at me like that? MrN 02:54, Feb 2 Delete.Bleh. Meh. Wait. What was I going to say? But still, it should have its template on the page.~ 02:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC) What, Where, When Get rid of it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 05:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. We don't need this. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter 10:36, Feb 2
Comments

Diocesan

Keep
Delete	Delete Below par School article which has been around a while. Probably funny if you go there, but I am no longer able to attend due to the restriction order. MrN 02:43, Feb 2 Delete per above. --S'r Mnbvcxz 02:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC) School Cruft —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 05:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. This isn't funny at all. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Schoolcruft of the unfunny variety. --UU - natter 10:33, Feb 2
Comments

Kjlaesehfkljadsfjkhlwehfklasjdgfkasdludghlsjkbsdagkjlasdhbg

Keep
Delete
Comments	Indifferent "eh". Seeing as the template was already on the page, though... Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC) I stuck it on QVFD. Sue me. MrN 01:15, Feb 2

El Fary

Keep
Delete	Delete. This article sucks. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:27, 28 January 2009 (UTC) Delete Already Nope this article Blows. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 03:07, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Shorts (small pants) MrN 21:55, Jan 29 Meh -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 06:23, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Make it go away.. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Fix there is some underlying humor, however, it is about a non-English speaking subject. --Mnbvcxz 15:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:We're Sorry!

Keep
Delete	Delete used once, it a talk archive. And to add insult to injury, it is an example of a stupid template, the likes of which a user is promising to never create again. Also, could this ever be funny anywhere? --Mnbvcxz 06:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC) QVFD You should had listed it at UN:QVFD this is a orphaned template already. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 06:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC) Would that be unused though? Its not technically a orphan. --Mnbvcxz 16:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Wolverhampton Wanderers

Keep	Keep Tis a British football team. MrN 18:34, Jan 30
Delete	Delete. What's this supposed to be? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:48, 30 January 2009 (UTC) I have to admit, I LOL'ed when I was just finishing an article totally devoid of jokes that just told a lame fictional story, and all of a sudden there's a picture of a dog with Spock ears for no reason. Delete anyway. pillow talk 16:08, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. per above. --Mnbvcxz 16:32, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Delete Tis a British football team. (OK, I give up. It's pants) MrN 02:57, Jan 31 O RLY? A British football team? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 05:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Lame

Keep
Delete	Delete it looks like a cross between an "unofficial & insulting rewrite template that puts stuff in its own obscure category" and the notorious crap template. If an article is lame, it should have a rewrite or fix template on it. Or, the author should userspace or QVFD it. --Mnbvcxz 17:01, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Impossible to imagine how this template could either improve a page or lead to its improvement. pillow talk 21:41, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. The template itself is kinda lame. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:41, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:08, 31 January 2009 (UTC) Delete MrN 05:21, Jan 31
Comments

Tornado Siren

Keep	Keep I actually find this article mildly amusing and it is not VFD material. Come on don't you know about these things. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 02:53, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Keep. A little polish and a memetic 4chanectomy and it'll be just fine.--Count of Monkey Crisco 03:25, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Keep Execution could be better, but the idea of a loud tornado generator is funny. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 06:26, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Keep This is not VFD material. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:05, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Keep per above. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:39, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Keep changed by mind. --Mnbvcxz 19:34, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:29, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete --Mnbvcxz 01:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	kept - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 05:29, Jan 31

Chuck Norris/2

Keep	Pansy-ass liberal Keep It's doing no harm, and it is rather dry and deadpan. MrN 22:27, Jan 26 Keep Per above. Besides, I like patchouli oil. But I prefer sandalwood.-- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 22:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Keep. That I'm no panty-ass liberal doesn't mean that I should vote "Delete" for just about anything. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:58, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Keep per above. --Mnbvcxz 05:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Keep per above and plus the fact Deleting Chuck Norris Articles are bad for the Uncyclopedia Servers. Did you guys already forget 9-21. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 03:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Strongest possible K33P I love this article! It has a Woody Allenesque charm to it. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 20:34, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete Worthless pile of crap. --Meganew (POST NOW!!!) 16:22, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per above. --Mnbvcxz 16:33, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. It's not harming anybody yet. But it's a potential threat. Using military force in the form of a pre-emptive strike is our moral imperative. Also: Sockpuppet is clearly a pansy-ass liberal, with his wimpy "live and let live" attitude and all the patchouli oil. pillow talk 17:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Annihilate this piece of crap! I'm not some pansy-ass liberal! And I have a merciless "kill and let die" attitude! I have no idea what came over me earlier, that last image must have misled me or something. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Not a subpage, but a sorry attempt at an article on its own. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:01, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Hype already wrote it. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 06:36, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Meh. It's just a subpage, I don't think it's harming anybody. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC) What was I thinking??? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC) What was I thinking? Agreeing with Hyperbole??? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:58, 26 January 2009 (UTC) It still stinks/sucks. --Meganew (POST NOW!!!) 17:21, 26 January 2009 (UTC) I just deleted the last 2 sections. The idea of some nerd having Chuck Norris' name may be salvageable. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 22:16, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Not only is it salvageable, but I already wrote it. pillow talk 22:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Yea, obviously your article is considerably better than this, but considering all the references we have to the apparent superhuman powers of Mr Norris, I think there is space in this wiki for more than one opposing view. Also, as your article is a FA it would be preferable that anyone who came along edited Chuck Norris/2 rather than making extensive changes to your article. MrN 22:36, Jan 26 Unless we stick a template on my article like "Whoops! Maybe you meant to vandalize Chuck Norris/2," I somehow doubt that the existence of this article is going to protect mine from vandalism. pillow talk 22:39, 26 January 2009 (UTC) I think there should be a link from each of these articles to the other, although you may not want to put a whoops at the top of onto yours. If this is kept, there should be some kinda link though. I'm not trying to protect your article from vandalism, but I think this is a concept which someone is likely to wish to re-visit. If they do, I would like them to use this article as a basis for that, rather than your article, which I would like to remain largely the same. If someone comes along, and starts making lots of changes to your article, you could point them in the direction of this one... MrN 22:46, Jan 26 Perhaps we should make an effort to create a substandard version of every feature on the site... The colour problem is, like, remember back when there was black and white TV? Well, there was no color. And when people first started needing colors, it was a problem. Hence the term "colour problem." Once, Steve Ballmer peed on my balls and then Grover jumped out and he molested Grover and then Brett and Jermaine from Flight of the Concords were like LOLOLOLOL. pillow talk 22:51, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Like Segregation? Note the FA in the corner. ;) MrN 23:09, Jan 26 It's still stupid. It's boring enough to be on Wikipedia. --Meganew (POST NOW!!!) 16:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Your mother is boring enough in bed to be on wikipedia. OOOOHHHHHH DAAAAAAAMMMMMNNN!!!!!!! Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 21:49, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Oh screw you, Colin. All I care about is seeing this article killed. --Meganew (POST NOW!!!) 22:13, 30 January 2009 (UTC) It's called a colon (:), love. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 22:31, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Kept. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 05:30, Jan 31

Recipes on Endangered Species

Keep	Keep as Salvagable and mildly funny As it is right now it is a formating mess. The Images need to be move the the right side of the page and the lists need to be improved. Now to bump the 2 off the fence to my side. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 03:22, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Keep.Provided somebody else is willing to do the formatting mentioned above. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 21:24, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Keep. This, if I had the time is exactly the type of article that I would take on. I still might. Maybe I could get DrStrange to come in we could - dare I say it - collaberate? Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 02:54, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Sure, perhaps I can make the prep instructions as gruesomely sadistic and enviro-unfriendly as possible. Having Santa Cruz hippies for friends while growing up might actually pay off for a change. It's still a research hog IMO but I'll stick an apple in it--    09:39, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. Do you see any funny in this? I don't. pillow talk 10:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC) *Delete. Unless someone wants to come along and provide actual jokes for the recipes, perhaps involving the capture of each animal and preparation. Are there any PETA people in the house that can help with that?--    10:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	abstain it has a might be savable feel to it. --Mnbvcxz 01:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Rewrite/hard A similar article to the one on Baby eating, or HowTo:Cook Children, really, only with endangered wildlife. Penalties for poaching should be mentioned somewhere in the article, so I added some. I also added a few jokes on capture. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 02:44, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Comment All Right I need some reformatting to make the article flow more smoothly. It also make the jokes in there more easy to spot which there are plenty of of. I suggest you guys vote keep on this one. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 03:36, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Calling this kept. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 05:30, Jan 31

Template:Queer level

Keep
Delete	Delete If someone tried to make a parody of a bad template, I'd be impressed if they came up with this. --Mnbvcxz 05:58, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Another "make this yourself" if you actually need a gayometer--    09:31, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Delete Its offensive because its so lousy. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:07, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. It sucks. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:35, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Too Gay. MrN 02:58, Jan 31
Comments

Template:Sandboxed

Keep	No VFD Template As of this post I find this template to be crap but due to the fact of the lack of the VFD template I am voting keep. (One should be added to the <noinclude> area of the template.) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 03:01, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Keep. ~ 11:52, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. SEND TO HELL!!! another perverse instruction template. We seriously don't need "go fuck up this page even moar" templates. Even if somebody wants to put this on a userpage, it should not be a mainspace template. Some noobs might think its an actual instruction. --Mnbvcxz 02:02, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete mostly because it sucks. It says "This page has been declared a sandbox," meaning "the page you're looking at", but then it includes a link to a subpage of "this" page that's supposed to be a sandbox. It doesn't make any fucking sense. pillow talk 16:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete 1) It was created way back in 2007 and 2)After checking "what links to this" only returns about seven things. And to me, an article that has been sandboxed is an article that has been placed in userspace for future editing. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 17:40, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete It's crap. However the reason why I don't feel like putting that template on is because I fell its the responsibility of the nominator to place it there unless that page is fully protected. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 21:18, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete this rubbish. --Docile hippopotamus 05:41, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Delete If a user finds this template, and decides to screw around all they like with the page... What will happen? MrN 18:37, Jan 30
Comments	Template is on. By the way, it would have been less work to add the template yourself then to tell nominator to add the template, and then change your vote from keep to delete. --Mnbvcxz 03:08, 29 January 2009 (UTC) I'd like to protest the arbitrary No VFD template rule. Voting keep solely because the nominator forgot to put the VFD template on the item in question is like letting a murderer off on a technicality. This is especially true for Templates on VFD, in which the VFD template is difficult to administer without having it show up on every page the original template is also located on. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:13, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Why are you protesting? As an admin, don't you have the power to just change the rule, strike the vote, and ban Sawblade? pillow talk 16:15, 29 January 2009 (UTC) I technically could, but that would be an "abuse of power" and more "respected" admins like Mordillo would just overturn my motion. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC) The VFD template needs to be placed in a noinclude section <noinclude>{{VFD}}</noinclude>. I occasionally forget things like that, along with VFH tags and changing vote totals. However, common courtesy should say that if you notice a nomination without a deletion tag, and you think it should be deleted, you should add the VFD tag yourself. --Mnbvcxz 17:32, 29 January 2009 (UTC) I'd like to protest the "Respected" bit before my name. I'd say that "Crap" is the more acceptable prefix. ~ 17:35, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Why are you protesting? As a bureaucrat, don't you have the power to demote TKF to an ordinary user and slap him with a seven-year ban to give him time to think about what he did? pillow talk 08:45, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Actually, I think staff are the only ones who can demote admins. --Mnbvcxz 19:31, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Warplane

Keep
Delete	Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:32, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per above. --Mnbvcxz 01:52, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per above also. Oh Yea, this is crap and besides the fact this is one of those things that you see you can't unsee it, be forewarned when voting for its deletion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 03:06, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete Shorts. MrN 21:57, Jan 29 Delete. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:38, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. I really don't see what's wrong with this one, but then again, I won't miss it. pillow talk 01:46, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Michigan State University

Keep
Delete	Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:33, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per above. --Mnbvcxz 01:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC) This Article Is Crap and is not Funny BTW what is per above reason were voting on? Oh Well, I find this article to be cruft and not funny. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 03:04, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Bleeah--    12:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Uni or school articles need to really have a concept above the usual (for me) and this one does not cut it. MrN 21:59, Jan 29
Comments

Florida, USA

Keep
Delete	Genuinely terrible, but it makes up for it by being long and messy. I looked for cruft to cut, but it's pretty much all cruft. Also, I think that this might be the first page I've ever nom'd for VFD. If it's not the first, then it's the second or third. In an event, it's given me a buzz. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:55, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete? I'm reasonably sure this is a recreation of deleted content. [1] pillow talk 08:42, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Um. The history shows that it's really old. If so, it's a bit late for a speedy delete, IMO, as a hundred newer, crappier edits have been made to the page. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:02, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete it anyway. I stand by my insistence that we act as quickly, decisively, and recklessly as possible and ignore procedure entirely. pillow talk 09:07, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Delete this as speedily as allowed by general Uncyclopedia policy. It's just some copied crap and it fucking sucks. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:39, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Delete This makes Template:Crap look like high art. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:03, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Delete and maybe redirect to Florida --Mnbvcxz 16:47, 30 January 2009 (UTC) I wish it will gats deletedfrom the wiki and redirected to Florida or a gay retared place. pillow talk 19:00, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Deleted and redirectified to Florida. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:12, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Field

Keep	Keep in trimmed form - I agree that the article, as a whole, is crap but by strategically throwing away a whole lot, something kind of sweet and amusing remains. I submit, for your consideration, my abridged article; although not perfect, I think that it's now keep-worthy. --Sir gwax (talk) 23:01, 23 January 2009 (UTC) Keep. Stubby, but passable. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 11:47, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Keep per above, being worked on. --Mnbvcxz 16:15, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Keep It's quite strange but really feels kind of like a field for some reason. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 06:32, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Annihilate this piece of crap! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:15, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 13:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC) delete per above. --Mnbvcxz 17:40, 18 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Kinda random, kinda dull, kinda listy. --UU - natter 10:16, Jan 20 Delete. Sorry gwax. Yea, I thought about trying to fix this one myself, but I figured there was so little worth keeping it was not worth it. Let's create a red link, and hope that someone decides to do a popper job on this... Anyway... gwax edited an article??? WTF? MrN 02:19, Jan 24
Comments	Too random Rewrite/hard or Move to ?pedia -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 00:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Strawberry Fields Does it so much better... MrN 12:22, Jan 24 I think it kills the joke, particularly the last sentence. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 06:33, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Two weeks, no clear winner. Keep'd Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:14, 30 January 2009 (UTC)