From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion. |
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete There is already an article called U.S.S.A. which follows the exact same idea. This one however is much shorter, unfunnier, and generally worse. --Kareljanis 09:29, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete or merge.--Mnbvcxz 05:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Delete and redirect. --UU - natter
 08:39, Dec 23
- Delete and maybe the image can be used on U.S.S.A. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
System Shock
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Short and unfunny. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:51, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Random and unfunny, plus its own of those articles that uses a randomness template like a badge of honor.--Mnbvcxz 00:53, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Kerkill --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 08:01, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete' I think they're trying to use humour with a video game subject, but the article isn't very good overall --Kareljanis, 12:17, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:15, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
Tekwar
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Do we really need this? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:21, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete random and red linky Btw, an obscure or even silly subject is not a good reason to delete an article.--Mnbvcxz 00:51, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Kerkill 2005cruft strikes again! Just like loneliness... --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 07:27, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Random and no real direction. --Kareljanis 12:10, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:15, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
Human race
| Keep |
- Keep I think this in an invalid nomination, or at the very least, its against the spirit of VFD to delete articles still being worked on. VFD's purpose is to get rid of articles that nobody cares about anymore.--Mnbvcxz 00:47, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
Delete as nominator. This page is overly long (as a result of trying to discuss many Pokémon which lack their own Uncyc articles), it is patently unfunny, and it serves no purpose that could not be served by Template:Pokemon. Also, the creator was apparently too lazy to capitalize the title properly, instead applying a {{title}} Band-Aid; compare Geogre's Law on Wikipedia. --Pentium5dot1|t~^_^~c 00:17, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- This page is a work in progress and will be re-checked on 29 December. Until then it would be somewhat inappropriate to vote it for deletion. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:31, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Invalid nom Although I honestly don't think it'll ever be any good. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:38, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Damn, how did I miss that? I am now withdrawing the nomination, so please don't hold this against me. --Pentium5dot1|t~^_^~c 05:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- If I told you I had a beautiful body, could I hold it against you? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Unvalid nom. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
|
Marcus Crassus
| Keep |
- Keep. I had a little tidy and removed some vanity. Not sure why, but I think we have worse towncruft. --UU - natter 09:35, Dec 20
- Keep. You make all us lazy buggers feel ashamed. MrN
 13:25, Dec 20
- Keep. It's good enough to stay. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 14:24, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Keep because they said so.--Mnbvcxz 17:04, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Because I live there, and it's all an accurate satire of this beautiful town.Anto475 23:08, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Abstain for now it looks like MrN9000 may be working on, and I'm and anti-deletionist.--Mnbvcxz 06:51, 19 December 2008 (UTC)Abstain so long as the above holds true. RabbiTechno 13:40, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Who me? Na, I'm not going to bother with this one... I just reverted back to an older version which was a bit less pants. Consider this an abs from me... It's borderline for sure... MrN 13:58, Dec 19
- Sod it then. Delete. RabbiTechno 14:04, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
- The people of Athlone will set it up again. Not me, but others.Anto475 15:53, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
- Uncyclopedia is not about having an article in place just because something exists. It's about having humorous articles up. If this were deleted and the townspeople set it up again, it would just be deleted again, they would be banned shortly, and the page would be protected from creation if the problem persisted. However, this page shall be keept, due to the score dictating it be as such. Harumph. -RAHB 08:41, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
|
Gemany
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete Content is- "chuck norris doesn't beileve in germany.... i mean who wants to like a country who bowed down tohitler " and only contributor is 98.113.46.122 Kareljanis, 4:18 20 December (UTC).
|
| Comments |
- Invalid Nom you should have used QVFD instead. Please read Uncyclopedia:Deletion_Policy before using VFD again. Cheers. MrN 20:28, Dec 20
- NOT BE CONFUSED WITH GERMANY like MrN9000 said, this should have been QVFD, an ICU would have probably been "valid" also, but too generous in this case. VFD is only for articles over 7 days old, and should generally be used for stuff nobody cares about.--Mnbvcxz 21:23, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
|
Eight
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete as useless duplicate of 8 (number). I thought about merging it, but no one (including me) had any ideas on how to do so. --Pentium5dot1|t~^_^~c 01:40, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per above.--Mnbvcxz 06:48, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
- Deleight. RabbiTechno 13:43, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Redirect to 8 (number). Mind you, that's not much better, but still... --UU - natter 09:38, Dec 20
- Delete. - I prefer Number Six--Sycamore (Talk) 13:01, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. and Redirect to 8 (number). (per everyone!) MrN 13:26, Dec 20
|
| Comments |
- To clarify, I allowed the merge discussion to run for one week but did not receive any response. --Pentium5dot1|t~^_^~c 20:32, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
|
Lecarow
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Shittily spelled towncruft. Colin
 ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 19:18, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per above, plus possible vanity. Also, you forgot the VFD template on this one too.--Mnbvcxz 06:53, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Incorrectly used apostrophe in the second sentence is reason enough. RabbiTechno 13:41, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. This is some of the worse towncruft. If I tidied and removed vanity and general rubbish, there wouldn't be anything left. --UU - natter 09:37, Dec 20
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:01, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
Megabyte
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- Abstain its bad, just it just doesn't have a VFD worthy feel to it for some reason.--Mnbvcxz 05:39, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- Is there any possibility of a merge or redirect to Kilobyte (or to something else on the Byte disambig such as Moosobyte)? --Pentium5dot1|t~^_^~c 01:34, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep Well, I think I took out most of the pointless crap. I do come from nearby, so what do I know, but I think this just makes it above the townfruft bar. Just. I will add it to my watchlist... MrN 19:51, Dec 16
- Keep because MrN9000 said so. Btw, who is Joey Babbage?--Mnbvcxz 06:00, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. I'm not anti-towncruft per se; this, though short, is not completely awful and may develop in time. RabbiTechno 11:25, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
Delete. towncruft, probable vanity, poorly formatted, random, not funny.--Mnbvcxz 18:02, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Kept, I guess. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon  (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 05:12, Dec 20
|
| Keep |
- Keep Um, what on earth are you doing dude? MrN 00:22, Dec 19
- I'm not really trying to get this deleted, just needed to bring it up. Can we prevent people from using a template page? --Mr. Monkey
 Pant-hoot here. 00:23, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
- This is SOOOO NOT the place to discuss this that it's crazy dude. Please don't do anything like this with VFD again. And no... Not that I know of. MrN 00:25, Dec 19
|
| Delete |
- Delete. We did a big nomination of templates that people felt encouraged IP's to write nonsense and vandalize pages; mostly, all of these were kept or slightly edited. However, of everything, I've always found the quote template to be the most irritating. You can tell it's an IP page from the ridiculous amount of poorly written, irrelevant quotes at the top of the page, yet they're practically never on featured pages; I can't recall ever seeing one with them. So, in lieu of deleting this (which I know will never happen), I have to ask: is there any way we can make a template unaccessible for IP or non-confirmed users? Seriously. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 00:04, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Keep. Looks like somebody already changed the template for the better, and I like the result. It no longer encourages nonsense at this time. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 01:40, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. ~ Mordillo where is my NIPPLES? 01:42, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Its easier to fix the template than to go thru and remove instance of the template.--Mnbvcxz 01:44, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Dude, removing lots of instances of a template is no problem for a bot. MrN 19:43, Dec 16
- K33P Contains trace amounts of Oscar Wilde. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 02:33, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 Compassionate Keep The HTBFANJS article is not to be taken seriously. My articles are now image whores. Plus, keep it, because we need anouther fact template to show that it has facts. That way, we can supplant the original one. And it has Oscar Wilde.  |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Pinoy CUN|IC Kill  | 03:41, 14 December 2008 (UTC)- Keep. (see comments below) Dame
 GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:09, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete. I hate this template. It says "This page is not random nonsense. Please rectify this situation." I don't think we should be encouraging writers to disregard HTBFANJS. --
 15Mickey20  (Ho ho ho to Mickey) 23:52, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- Please delete - My life would be a whole lot easier if it were gone.. --monika 00:31, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- pointless anti-cabal embargo delete--Sycamore (Talk) 11:44, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete The best articles contain lots of facts which are twisted into something fun. As a maintenance template this has no purpose and sends the wrong message. Agreed we have lots of templates which are funny enough in their own right to be great additions to the wiki, but I don't think this is one of them. I do not find it funny. Also this template does encourage random writing, and so probably has a negative effect on some editors. I think we are better off without it, and can clean up the mess no problem if this is deleted using MrN9001... MrN 19:43, Dec 16
- This template did have some of the more offensive options from the choose command removed. I think its good enough now. Well were at it, we might want to tweak other, related templates.--Mnbvcxz 19:16, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- How about we change the template to a positive template, getting rid of every instance of it is too much like work. While I agree that this template should go, I don't <think> VFD is the place to deal with the issue. What we should do is discuss this in the forum, as there are other templates like this: ones that reward nonsense and place a de facto "fix" tag of articles that make sense.--Mnbvcxz 00:39, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- After looking at it, it doesn't look like its been changed, it just landed on a less nonsense glorifying option. I'll try fixing it and hope nobody cares.--Mnbvcxz 01:48, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- I fixed the template up, so its not a "fix because HTBFANJS rules are observed" template improve it more if you want to.--Mnbvcxz 01:56, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- DISCLAIMER I seriously rearranged the template while the vote was going on. I thought someone else fixed, but it turns out they didn't, so I went ahead and changed it significantly. Right now, its at a "good enough until someone else gets off their ass and fixes it" stage. Also, it didn't used to contain Oscar Wilde.--Mnbvcxz 04:07, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- No offense, I liked Micky's version better. And he did rearrange the template the same day you did ~ Mordillo where is my NIPPLES? 11:55, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Um, I think Mikcy just added the VFD template. The last edit was Codeine on Nov 11, and that was reverting vandalism. The template does choose random texts, so you might saw different text, and thought it was toned down. I'm not too fond of my version either, but its better than a "This article obeys HTBFANJS, so please rewrite it into complete bullocks" template.--Mnbvcxz 17:19, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- This is the version I like. It doesn't encourage randomness, and I find it amusing. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:01, Dec 14
- I'm with TheLedBalloon on that one. That version's funny, but not encouraging to make the article worse... --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 19:07, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with TheLedBallon & MrMonkey, mine was over correction. It might still need some work, if anyone has time and is not involved in more important matters.--Mnbvcxz 19:34, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yup. Leddy's version is better. RabbiTechno 10:43, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- I just ate some cake. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:44, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Modus didn't save me any, and thus I hate his guts. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:14, Dec 15
- Here we are again debating the value of something that has value. Putting something on VFD involves more than not getting something. This template on articles that either have too may facts (or none at all) has value. With there being some serious crap on the site - I'm talking about articles that are written without complete sentences, and very few jokes - we should be addressing those articles, not things like this. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:09, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- I understand your point, and I'm an anti-deletionist myself. However, this template did have a perverse effect, it was almost a "this article passes HTBFANJS, so rewrite it into complete bullocks" template. I believe the issue has been fixed by some pruning of bad options, and the consensus is keep right now.--Mnbvcxz 19:16, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- Keept -RAHB 01:55, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
|
Subservient Chicken
| Keep |
- I'm probably too late, but keep. It's got some good lines. You all suck. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:45, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Keep I think the voters for deletion are bullies seeking revenge for General Obsequinsky sending them to detention. --Naughtius Maximus
 F@H Woof! MeowMUN 21:18, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete. - Random 2005 bollocks. I saw nothing worth saving.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:22, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Very very random. What is it about chickens that encourages randomness anyway? —–Sir Heerenveen, KUN UotM RotM VFH (talk), 13/12 21:18
- Delete per above.--Mnbvcxz 21:36, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN 12:32, Dec 14
- Delete. Heerenveen raises an interesting question re. chickens. What is it with them? RabbiTechno 10:37, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. It may be because they always cross roads seemingly... randomly. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:16, Dec 15
|
| Comments |
|
iCarly
| Keep |
medium-weak Keep This article has over 100 kilobytes of material. Surely something decent has to be lurking in there, you can't write 100 kb of stuff without something good decent presentable enough (by our standards) remaining.--Mnbvcxz 19:43, 14 December 2008 (UTC)Keep for now. A couple of IPs have been putting a lot of work into it recently and you never know, they may improve it (and even if they don't, at least it keeps them out of trouble). I'd say let 'em get on with it and review the situation in a couple of weeks or so. RabbiTechno 10:34, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Went in to revert some vandalism to find that this page sucks. A lot. And it's massive, which is just even more suckage all packed in there. This is notable material, granted, but I think a reboot would be best, unless some brave soul is willing to trim it down to a manageable size. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 18:25, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. - this is the sad reality of multiple IP authors. Its not pretty. In response length of crap argument, that should in no way preclude it from deletion. Note the slightly more cultured lexical choice 'Preclude'.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:48, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete- just to send the edit history to hell, then let it be re-created. The ips are fighting my attempts to purge the article of the child pr0n sections. Looking over this, I can't find anything at all that is close to savable. I deleted literally half the material (mainly the sex parts), and it still was a hodgepodge of necromancy, drug references, inconsistency, and needless violence. Deleting this will prevent the ips from restoring the unfunny sections.--Mnbvcxz 17:04, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete.. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:12, Dec 15
- Delete Yea, there is no concept here above what has been done a lot better elsewhere. Delete it. MrN 23:54, Dec 15
Delete. Having just reverted it after an IP removed the VFD tag again, I had a look at changes made recently to the article and, hell, you're all right. It's shit and it's never going to improve. Kill it. RabbiTechno 16:20, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- I'm going to blindly purge all the child pr0n material out of the text.--Mnbvcxz 15:27, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Also, this article did have a VFD tag on it placed by the nominator. It was removed by an ip apparently.--Mnbvcxz 17:06, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Indeed, it was. Almost immediately. I replaced it on the page, and if they take it off again, I'll make sure they go on Ban Patrol. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:11, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Also, when ever you delete this article, I'd watch ip "76.185.209.22", I have the feeling he might do some things that may require a "time out".--Mnbvcxz 05:33, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
- I'm abstaining for now. The IP 76.185.209.22 has begun to remove some of the sexual content and I'm just too nice for my own good and thus will give them the benefit of the doubt. RabbiTechno 16:52, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
|
NAAUP
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. - Lousy Zombie politics article. I don't think it works and I doubt this idea is going to take off.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:46, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm pretty much with Sycamore here - it's got an idea, but it doesn't do said idea very well at all. —–Sir Heerenveen, KUN UotM RotM VFH (talk), 13/12 21:16
- D1337 Per the fact that it's half, no three-quarters, alas, complete shit. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 03:58, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Bleh. RabbiTechno 10:35, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- D'leet • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:16, Dec 15
|
| Comments |
- Meh I'd say its not quite delete worthy, it might be savable.--Mnbvcxz 16:52, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
|
The Boondock Saints
Alien Movie
Colin the Funky Haddock
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. 2007cruft, unedited since, hopelessly random, and not funny to boot. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:33, Dec 12
- Delete per above.--Mnbvcxz 17:57, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- You're lucky this page has "Colin" in the title, otherwise I wouldn't have put in the VFD tag. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 19:00, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. The title made me hope for a chuckle. The random redlinky wibble left me disappointed. --UU - natter 09:12, Dec 13
- Delete. MrN 14:54, Dec 13
|
| Comments |
|
James Riha
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Unfunny Vanity.Mnbvcxz 16:11, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:35, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Also, FU edit conflict! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:36, Dec 12
- Delete. Yawn. --UU - natter 09:11, Dec 13
- Delete. MrN 14:55, Dec 13
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- very keep - This is a major historical event in military history. Also this does not look nearly crap enough to be VFD'd - its not a badge of honour to post on here.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:01, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- weak keep. not too bad, has some potential. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:07, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- very keep because Sycamore said so.--Mnbvcxz 16:10, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. MrN 13:06, Dec 12
- Keepish • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:35, Dec 12
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Abstain I suggest a hard rewrite, not deletion.--Mnbvcxz 05:40, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Kept. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 17:28, Dec 13
|
Poncess James of Poland
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Is it just me, or is this basically vanity bollocks about some guy called James who moved from Canada to Walsall, and some people who know him? And at the very least, isn't it un-linked-to crap? --UU - natter 15:35, Dec 10
- Delete per above, vanity and/or cyber bullying, mixed with nonsense.--Mnbvcxz 17:18, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:02, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- D'leet • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:34, Dec 12
|
| Comments |
|
Penman and Paperboy
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Vanity. Oh, plus it's not linked from anywhere, it's kind of a factual thing about this guy's little webcomic, it's kinda dull and so forth. --UU - natter 15:27, Dec 10
- Delete per above, web comic whoring.--Mnbvcxz 15:33, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete MrN 23:19, Dec 10
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:02, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- speedy delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
Olympique Lyonnais
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Footiecruft. Unlinked-to, unfunny, random French footiecruft. With lists. --UU - natter 10:50, Dec 10
- Delete. RabbiTechno 11:08, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per above.--Mnbvcxz 14:49, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete looks like the author has left the site... MrN 23:17, Dec 10
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:03, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
Idiology
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. I did start to tidy this up, with a mass list cull and suchlike. Then I realised it was just a direct copy of idiots, and brought it here instead. It's not linked from anywhere, there's no idea as it's a spork of another idea-free article, and it can go bye-bye. --UU - natter 10:01, Dec 9
- Delete. As per above. RabbiTechno 14:43, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per above.--Mnbvcxz 17:07, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete MrN 00:32, Dec 10
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:03, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
Ian Brady
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Random bollocks from 2006 with little to no improvement since then. --UU - natter 09:47, Dec 9
- Delete. RabbiTechno 14:41, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Hmm. Tricky one. A well known person and such, but UU won me over regarding the "Random bollocks" issue. Let's try again... MrN 00:31, Dec 10
- Delete per above, not well known enough.--Mnbvcxz 05:42, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:03, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:51, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. It's being edited, and not in what I would consider a bad way. Agreed, it's a school article being written by the students, but for me there is more to this than being a standard "this sux balls" article. I think it's good enough. There is an active discussion on the talk page, and I think deleting this would be harsh. MrN 20:34, Dec 5
- Keep. because Sycamore and MrN9000 said so. There are tons of articles that nobody cares about that should be deleted before this kind of article.--Mnbvcxz 05:39, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- K33P Because all these nice people voted keep, and the majority can never be wrong. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 01:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete. This article just isn't working for me. The title is grammatically wrong, and it's one of those standard 'why the school sucks' articles that gets bombarded with edits from the students. -
 Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate  21:46, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- D'leet. WIP or not, "I hate this shcool lol" articles all deserve to die. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:30, Dec 5
- Delete. Better than most of its breed, I was undecided. Enzo's point about the title made my mind up. RabbiTechno 16:43, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- It looks like it might be a work in progress.--Mnbvcxz 05:59, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
This has been here long enough. Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:22, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Unfunny stub from '07, little improvement (Fnoodle corrected a typo), linked from only one article (human), and not funny to boot. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:33, Dec 5
- Delete. Blank slate case if ever there was one. RabbiTechno 18:29, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Comment, I've tided this a little, I reckon this is more of a {{Stub}}/{{Catstub|}} case...--Sycamore (Talk) 17:53, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- Unless someone is going to adopt this, I think its VFD worthy.--Mnbvcxz 18:21, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- Keept -RAHB 06:32, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
|
Darryl Wolski
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. This is basically an ED article. You can tell from the first line. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 00:34, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete and return it to ED where it belongs.--Mnbvcxz 00:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Short, unfunny, ranty. --UU - natter 10:50, Dec 8
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 20:51, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yeaho. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:11, Dec 9
- Delete. MrN 03:16, Dec 9
|
| Comments |
|
The USSA
Delete.--
Compassionate Keep The HTBFANJS article is not to be taken seriously. My articles are now image whores. Plus, keep it, because we need anouther fact template to show that it has facts. That way, we can supplant the original one. And it has Oscar Wilde. 
