Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive235

Avril Lavigne

Score: 4
Keep (1)	#Keep and rewrite tag. There's a few scattered good jokes in there, and frankly, about half of everything I've ever written on this site would suddenly have a red link in it if this gets deleted. pillow talk 04:12, March 28, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Per and for Hyperbole. And why only half? You could shoulder linking most of the rest of your pages. Aleister 12:05 28-3-'11 Sometimes, you just can't find a good opportunity to talk shit about Avril Lavigne in a hidden link. Usually you can :) pillow talk 15:04, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)	I was thinking of heeding the rewrite tag, but then I decided to just put it up here so that it can be wiped out. Anybody who actually has a sense of humor can write about her from scratch. --Scofield 18:56, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Spıke ¬ 20:18 27-Mar-11 Smite. Basically, the general theme of the article is "Avril is a lesbian that has gas problems." Funny. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 21:26, March 28, 2011 (UTC) Shit, I was wrong about the few scattered good jokes. This is fucking horrible. We can temporarily redirect to Avril's_Butt_(Template_Family). I'll see if I can work something up that's worthy of being here.I maed a yuky rewrite. pillow talk 21:46, March 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Mostly cruft. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:30, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Okay, this isn't my best work by a long shot, but I did a start-class rewrite that at least has something to do with Lavigne. Replace the page with mine? What do you think? pillow talk 22:55, March 28, 2011 (UTC) Replace it Hyperbole. This new beat is plenty rock-steady. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:59, March 28, 2011 (UTC) Replace it. But lose the initial template. Spıke ¬ 23:02 28-Mar-11 Asking me to lose the initial template would be like asking Sarah Palin to lose Trig! Just because it's retarded doesn't mean it isn't family! pillow talk 23:08, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Gilles Villeneuve

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Suggests the subject is gay and a pedophile without any good humour. 18:03, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Delete. And for similar instant laughs, involves rednecks (okay, perhaps, when discussing auto racing), Mexicans, and Jews, from the school of thought where hitting an Uncyclopedia home run is just a matter of stepping on all four meme bases. Also, he was named Gilles because he was born with gills! Get it? Spıke ¬ 18:29 27-Mar-11 I would rather ram an eighteen-inch dagger through mmy forehead than let anyone else read that. It isn't funny at all; it's just random. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 21:01, March 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I would rather stab Gamma287 with an eighteen inch dagger than read that again. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:00, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. The Count agrees. Hey, wait!!! --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 00:32, March 29, 2011 (UTC)

UnPoetia:Couplet

Score: -3
Keep (6)	Keep Could have been better, but there's no reason to delete it. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:58, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Brrr... MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:02, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Yeah not bad enough. (talk) 22:53, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Shitty but I can't imagine anything better with that title. pillow talk 04:13, March 28, 2011 (UTC) Feature Aleister 13:25 28-3-'11 Karpt. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:13, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. No humour whatsoever here, just some inane self-reference. 17:56, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Grrr... 1234 ~ 19:50, 27 March 2011 Delete. Instantly ironic--but not clever. Spıke ¬ 20:21 27-Mar-11
Comments	Kept: 5 keep votes. pillow talk 15:05, March 28, 2011 (UTC) Since when has that been a policy? --ChiefjusticeXBox 17:06, March 28, 2011 (UTC) The idea gained pretty good traction (given the size of the active voting base at the time) at Forum:More VFD stuff. Also, I won't count on 7 more delete votes showing up within the next hour either, so a more traditional keep is imminent anyway. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:13, March 28, 2011 (UTC) Is there a policy that says that "5 keep votes = kept" is not our policy? I've read the deletion policy, and I don't think I saw anything that forbade me from closing this nomination, which is very obviously going to result in a keep anyway. pillow talk 17:18, March 28, 2011 (UTC) You didn't read anything about leaving the nomination open 24 hours, despite how it may look the vote is going? Spıke ¬ 17:20 28-Mar-11 All right, all right, I'll leave these kinds of things open. But we both know that the point of that rule is to make sure something doesn't get deleted before the author has a chance to show up and explain himself - not to ensure that we can't close nominations that don't have a bat's chance in hell of succeeding. pillow talk 17:23, March 28, 2011 (UTC) Besides, even if 11 more Uncyclopedians suddenly showed up and voted "Delete", there's still a prevailing sentiment that the result should be "Kept." pillow talk 17:24, March 28, 2011 (UTC) OK, now it's official. Spıke ¬ 23:04 28-Mar-11 Okay, kept, yes, but it is possible that there may be more than 5 keeps on something that a majority of the community would still rather overrule. There are certain... things. Yes, these days there are established rules for administrators to delete most of such things on sight without them ever coming here, but... don't count on that covering all of them. Obviously that doesn't apply to this. That's not the point. 1234 ~ 04:50, 29 March 2011

Marshall Applewhite

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. This article doesn't deal with the cult leader in a funny way. It just calls him homosexual. -- 10:31, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Also a hefty dose of Nazism and even Scientology--saying very little about his eminently ready for ridicule real-life religious cult and mass suicide. The facts are funnier than this article. Spıke ¬ 12:56 27-Mar-11 Huh, and the article gave me the impression he wasn't even a real person. Or wasn't he? Maybe there was an elaborate conspiracy... but I digress. 1234 ~ 19:50, 27 March 2011 Delete. "Delete Me!" is written all over this article. If this is really worth writing about, someone please start over and try again. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 21:17, March 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Failed to make me laugh. pillow talk 23:05, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Inside Dr Who

Score: 0
Keep (1)	Keep Only an hour old. Stop trying to game the system. I've no idea what gaming the system means - just my favourite ban comment. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:52, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. What is this I don't even -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 22:49, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Both of you are violating the system of VFD. It has only been around for a few hours. If you really don't like it, put it on QVFD. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 22:54, March 28, 2011 (UTC) Don't you lecture me lolliflop. We're at war here son! MAN UP! mAttlobster. (hello) 22:56, March 28, 2011 (UTC) This has an ICU and is on QVFD. What in the fuck are we doing? (talk) 22:58, March 28, 2011 (UTC) Yup, invalid nom. Author is trying hard to be funny, but simply isn't. He isn't trying hard to make this look like an Uncyclopedia article; that's Lollipop doing that, also InB4 Olipro with {{ICU}}. Spıke ¬ 22:59 28-Mar-11 I'm not sure Uncyclopedia will recover from this. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:00, March 28, 2011 (UTC) Invalid: nomination closed. It's nice not to be the admin fucking things up for a change. pillow talk 23:02, March 28, 2011 (UTC) Blame Killiondude, he linked it on IRC -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 16:15, March 29, 2011 (UTC) If it was an IP, I wouldn't be so nice. I noticed it was a new user, so I added formatting and an ICU tag. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 23:27, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Long article

Score: -4
Keep (6)	Keep. An established page, I believe. Linked History of Great Britain, which I call "The Epic", to the top, and removed a long stupid thing. Most of the rest is actual writing, seemingly coherent. Aleister 11:19 27-3-'11 Keep The joke is that it's called 'Long article' and it's a long article. I know this isn't groundbreaking but it should not be deleted. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:23, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Dicks dicks dicks dicks -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 12:01, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Uber keep! A lot of effort went into this. LOL vandalz 12:06, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Keep. This has gained my seal of approval. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 21:22, March 28, 2011 (UTC) Keep Should be longer, though. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:36, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Delete and redirect to History of Great Britain. Only the very beginning is actually about long articles, after which it immediately devolves into repetitive crap, and cutting it down to relevant content that has a hope of being funny after the novelty of the fact that it is long would remove the longness. Add to that that said relevant content is in fact rather boring and not particularly amusing, anyhow, why not redirect the entire thing to an actual long article that is worth reading? 1234 ~ 10:38, 27 March 2011 Redirect. Apart from the length of the page, there's nothing particularly funny in here. 17:50, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Can someone change the name back to "Long article" from "Zork", I can't find the code where that was done. Gotta be there somewhere. Aleister 11:21 27-3 I removed that as well as chunks of two books (one of which was in there twice; weren't even unique chunks of two books) and a some strings of digits and about ten sections of flat-out repetition and now it's not even long. 1234 ~ 11:30, 27 March 2011 Bad writing--including verbosity--comes so easily to some of us that a showcase of it is not notable. But if Lyrithya says this particular showcase is now under control, I'll abstain. Spıke ¬ 12:51 27-Mar-11 Under control? It's not even long anymore. Now it's just a bad article that's kind of long, without even that joke going for it. Not that it was much of one. 1234 ~ 18:21, 27 March 2011 I can see the start of what you call a 'meme' here. Any long article will be redirected to the Romartus-Zarbag epic History of Great Britain. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:24, March 28, 2011 (UTC) Not so much a 'meme', as not so much a 'meme'. Do you see? mAttlobster. (hello) 21:42, March 28, 2011 (UTC) Kept. pillow talk 21:46, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

:Category:Bearded Women

Score: -1
Keep (4)	Keep. Of the five pages originally in this category, I removed one where the category was added as random noise, and one where Aleister simply wanted to write a page with a list of categories seven lines long. A third is on VFD, above. The other two are arguably about bearded women. Spıke ¬ 05:08 27-Mar-11 Let's keep this motherfucker, should we? |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Man on Fire CUN|IC Kill | 05:55, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Keep. SPIKE vandalized Poop throwing monkeys by removing this relevant category. Some of the chimps are woman, and they are undoubtedly bearded. And  For. all the people who come to uncyclopedia and ask themselves "I wonder if there are any pages about bearded women? This is my interest, and I will check the categories section." We must think of our readers. Aleister 10:37 27-3-'11 On "Monkeys," of course, you are not thinking about your readers; you are patting yourself on the back. Spıke ¬ 12:49 27-Mar-11 If we all had arms as long as a gibbons it would be much easier to pat ourselves on the back. Then again, what about turtles, who don't even know they have a back to pat.Aleister 15:43 27-3-'11 Keep Categories don't have to categorise, they just have to be amusing. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:18, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. Another category which fails to categorize.--Count of Monkey Crisco 02:57, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Is there a point to random categories about nothing? --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:57, March 27, 2011 (UTC) I was going to say keep until I saw what was in it. Shame. 1234 ~ 19:45, 27 March 2011
Comments	I've added quite a few pics, so the category does categorize now. Aleister 11:22 27-3-'11 Kept. Improved during VFD process. Renom later if necessary. pillow talk 15:06, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

The Last World War

Score: -2
Keep (5)	Lots of reasons to save it. The map sequence for one, interesting. It has sections, and a timeline which has minor coherence. Some of the words are real words, and they can be manipulated and moved to form concepts and whatnot. My thumb is sticking up (hey, get off of there buddy). Aleister 13:09 26-3-'11 Keep, if Aleister's volunteering. The intro is good; how indeed does anyone know a war is either "Last" or "First"? Needs a better link to the real-world "war to end all wars." The description of the actual progress of the war is tedious. Spıke ¬ 14:10 26-Mar-11 Keep since Aleister's comment is being misread. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:43, March 26, 2011 (UTC) 'Keep Just because. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:26, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Keep I like it, Quite funny. - LOL vandalz 15:11, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. This is just a poorly written fantasy with few attempts at humour. 10:16, March 26, 2011 (UTC) GREASER! 1234 ~ 21:54, 26 March 2011  Too many World War -insert here- jokes. Propane time HAMMERZIET! --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 01:50, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. This was the very first article I ever edited (as an IP) so it'll be sad to let this one go. Not like anyone else cares. - LOL vandalz 10:20, March 26, 2011 (UTC) Comment. If there's a chance that someone's willing to sort this out, I can't really justify voting delete on this one, although the current content is pretty terrible. -- 21:19, March 26, 2011 (UTC) Comment. Since everyone is misreading my comment as an offer to work on the page, I'll just sit in back here, eat popcorn, and watch. Aleister 22:41 26-3-'11 Mmm, popcorn. 1234 ~ 21:54, 26 March 2011 Well, I did some edits, a few, and may go back. The page is pretty good just looking at the pics and reading a few lines here and there. There are paragraphs and everything. Aleister 22:30 26-3-'11 Kept. Apparently improved during VFD process. pillow talk 15:07, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Pikachu seizure

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. We really don't need a seizure page THIS dull. --Scofield 08:36, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Just retarded. -- 10:32, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Delete. A vehicle for a handful of animations and links to external sites. Spıke ¬ 12:58 27-Mar-11 Right... you know, we really don't need seizure pages at all, really. 1234 ~ 18:36, 27 March 2011 Delete. This isn't really much of a seiure page... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 23:12, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Don't you dare nominate any of the other seizure pages! --Scofield 18:51, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

Joey gladstone

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. I don't see how this has been here for almost a year... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 05:06, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Died...in a sleeping bag unrolling accident. That was a gem. There could be a couple others, but they are hidden in this long ramble about a TV character. Spıke ¬ 05:14 27-Mar-11 Cut! It! Out! (canned laughter) --Count of Monkey Crisco 05:59, March 27, 2011 (UTC)  Obliterate! No exceptions! |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Man on Fire CUN|IC Kill | 06:01, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Drug it with a tranquilizer, tie it up in plastic, slice it with a hand-saw, and throw it in the Bay Harbor, where some treasure hunters may find it. --Scofield 08:42, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

The infamous Grey shoelace

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Rambling nonsense. Why? Why? --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:57, March 27, 2011 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! That is all. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 04:00, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Articles like this are an author's demonstration of his ability to free-associate, not an attempt to do anything for the reader. 04:59 The intro is exceptionally bad at inducing the reader to finish the article. And, God damn it, don't use "infamous" when you mean "notorious" (and when there is no intrinsic reason even to use "notorious" except to puff up your writing). Nothing in this article suggests infamy. Spıke ¬ 16:13 27-Mar-11 Not even well written, either. 1234 ~ 19:46, 27 March 2011 Lame. pillow talk 04:14, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Thaddeus T. Wafflebottom

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Here's the rundown: made up character does something random and wacky, nobody cares. Repeat until bored from writing. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:57, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Nuke this waffle. It's more random than what I wrote as a n00b. Good show... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:56, March 27, 2011 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! I haven't seen an article this bad for quite some time. -- 10:26, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Despite care taken on presentation and shooping, this article is bad writing about a character that the author dreamed up, and about whom he repeatedly emphasizes that nobody cares. Spıke ¬ 16:20 27-Mar-11 What... 1234 ~ 19:42, 27 March 2011
Comments

Special:PrefixIndex/Vandalism/example on wheels!/Archive

Score: 1
Keep (2)	Keep Oh look it hasn't even been a month. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:03, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Keep Invalid nom. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:15, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Sure, I can see why people might want to keep the Vandalism example on wheels (I guess), but why do we keep these? Not like there's anything to read, just browser-crashing madness. Also, they're cluttering up Special:LongPages. 1234 ~ 19:24, 27 March 2011 Delete, one of the few things i don't like on uncyclopedia! Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 20:07, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Go write a funny article. Spıke ¬ 20:17 27-Mar-11
Comments	Invalid nom(?) Look!--> This has been done before. - LOL vandalz 19:27, March 27, 2011 (UTC) That was a month ago (okay, a day less than a month ago, but in this case...) - things can be renominated after a month. Except this isn't the same nomination, anyhow; that was the example and all of the archives. This is just the archives. 1234 ~ 19:41, 27 March 2011 Too soon. If Dexter wants to wikilawyer this nomination, let's go ahead and make his nigger ass wait a day or three before he casts his keep vote. pillow talk 20:16, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

The best joke ever

Score: 0
Keep (5)	Keep.. Sadistic and funny! A two in one! However, the grammar and spelling could be improved... *goes into grammar rant* --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 01:41, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Keep. This held my attention throughout. It kept getting better and better in terms of handling of time and space, concepts of "the one spirit" and matter and energy as one point shared by every life. And the concept of the all-in-one (I and I) collectively handing its negative emotional content and pain to one faultless individual actually not only summarizes many of the messiah legends but in some ways extends them. In that aspect of itself it may, indeed, be the best joke ever, even if it's no laughing matter. Aleister 2:02 27-3-'11 Keep Stupid nomination. mAttlobster. (hello) 02:17, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Keep. i get it, he walked into a bar. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:06, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Keep MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:13, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Delete. This simply isn't a great concept: the joke tries to be as unfunny as possible. As a result, the whole page is just unfunny. 10:22, March 26, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Deliberate unfunny--although it does count as success at something--isn't funny. We sometimes showcase pages for their unfunniness, but they have something notable about them. Spıke ¬ 14:14 26-Mar-11 Delete. Best joke ever indeed. (talk) 19:05, March 26, 2011 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! I get it... it's just extremely unfunny, and that's the whole point of a "joke." -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 05:27, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Keeping this sort of thing is apt to make the impressionable think that this sort of thing is actually a good idea. 1234 ~ 18:35, 27 March 2011
Comments	Author created at least 4 pages to point to this one. Spıke ¬ 14:14 26-Mar-11 Kept. 5 keep votes. pillow talk 21:39, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

Stan (country)

Score: -1
Keep (5)	Stub The opening paragraph is decent, and the image makes sense. I would just delete everything else and stub it. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 09:02, March 26, 2011 (UTC) Keep. What TheSlyFox said, then it can be built up again. A play on words for all those countries that end in Stan. Aleister 22:37 26-3-'11 But we do that elsewhere, and better, notably in Wherethefuckistan. Spıke ¬ 16:23 27-Mar-11 Streep. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:16, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Keep mAttlobster. (hello) 11:27, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Keep Short in no way means it's bad. You all need to back away from that way of thinking, else you'll never get invited to parties. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:15, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Delete. Relies too much on large numbers and random for humour. 21:32, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Begins promisingly: Use generic -stan suffix, confuse it with Satan, and take some slaps at Asian countries (in after Borat, but might still work). Then Section 1 abruptly changes to Wacky War, the Great Pie War against the right-thinking LEET people. Motivation for, conduct of, and resolution of the war, is all babble. Finishes up with listcruft, more leetcruft, and stick figures. Find a user's sandbox for it. Spıke ¬ 22:30 25-Mar-11 Equally delete-worthy in its new life as a stub. Spıke ¬ 16:23 27-Mar-11 Bloody hell, that's random. 1234 ~ 09:13, 26 March 2011  Propane! Random, listy, etc. Now, where's my RPG-7? --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 02:00, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Pruned and stubbed, plus some quick fixes. I know it's not brilliant, but you get the idea. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 01:51, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Isn't this what Undictionary is for, now? 1234 ~ 10:27, 27 March 2011 When's the last time anyone read undictionary. I've never even looked at it. Maybe people read it all the time. Above my paygrade. Aleister 12:10 27-3-'11 No, nobody does; it's fallen into disrepair. Alas! 1234 ~ 18:22, 27 March 2011 Kept. 5 keep votes.

Mouldy bread

Score: 1
Keep (5)	Keep I reverted the vandalism (I am great! [It did delete the VFD tag but one of you keeners will slip that back in]). Don't know what your definition of memes is Spiketron, but there don't seem to be any in here? Anyway, it's not brilliant, but neither's the letter "j" and nobody's recommending we delete that are they? mAttlobster. (hello) 16:21, March 24, 2011 (UTC) As well as established memes, I include celebrity names thrown in for the sake of instant humor (just add humor). In the first paragraph of Section 1: Gore, Jim Henson, and Oprah; and perhaps Turing and Merlin. Spıke ¬ 17:13 24-Mar-11 Keep Good idea. This will be a featured article in the next five years. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:12, March 24, 2011 (UTC) I... kind of like it. 1234 ~ 22:38, 24 March 2011 "Memes." -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:41, March 24, 2011 (UTC) Four established users can live with it. Aleister 20:41 27-3-'11
Delete (6)	Delete. Redlinky and overly random. Not to mention that fake science, Oprah and Al Gore do not make for a very good combination, even though it sounds like it might. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 11:46, March 24, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Yup; memes and rambling is all this Wacky Malady has going for it. Spıke ¬ 12:10 24-Mar-11 No. Not worth it. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:42, March 24, 2011 (UTC) Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 23:19, March 24, 2011 (UTC)  Propane! Occursed memes... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 04:55, March 27, 2011 (UTC) What is this? -- The Zombiebaron 05:15, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. 5 keep votes. pillow talk 21:40, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

Veggie Tales

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Keep. Should be tagged for ICU. Plenty of good ideas, just needs to be fixed up a bit Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 22:00, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Delete. This is irritating enough without the statement that it was written by Hitler. 10:27, March 26, 2011 (UTC) Moldy. "Bro-cco-li! Ce-le-ry! Go-tta be..." whoops, wrong channel. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 12:13, March 26, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Author does not know how to spell, does not know that a "pickel" is a cucumber, and does not know how to create comedy except to link to Hitler-versus-Jews for instant laughs. Spıke ¬ 14:19 26-Mar-11  Propane! That's how this should be burned. Hitler and fascism jokes are old and must be eradicated! --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 01:37, March 27, 2011 (UTC)  Let's kill this fundie Christian shit. |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Man on Fire CUN|IC Kill | 05:56, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Spike, it's actually a running joke in VeggieTales that Larry (a cucumber) is often mistaken for a pickle. Then again, it's obvious that not everyone would know that, which makes it fancruft in this context. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 00:58, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

Rooms

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	This has several ideas in it that could become articles, none of which go beyond a couple of words. The overall is much too decrepit to keep, however, unless someone wants to adopt it. 1234 ~ 08:54, 26 March 2011 This is one of those articles which can't be improved apart from by blanking and starting again. -- 09:46, March 26, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Inept. Spıke ¬ 14:07 26-Mar-11  Propane gas explosion inside of a room. It's already a stub, so imagine how short it will be afterwards! --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 01:47, March 27, 2011 (UTC)  Burninate! Umm, what? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 05:36, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Void Goddess

Score: 2
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (2)	Burn with propane. Porn joke, another porn joke, three more BDSM jokes, no images (shocker). I blame twelve year olds... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 02:08, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Delete. A sales-pitch for a made-up porn character. You said the secret void. Spıke ¬ 04:56 27-Mar-11
Comments	Please, check the histories before nominating articles - this is only two days old. Put it on ICU, not VFD. 1234 ~ 05:31, 27 March 2011

Game:The Number of the Beast

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	EXTERMINATE! Epic fail. QVFDcruft. - LOL vandalz 22:25, March 26, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate for use of ***GAME OVER, YOU SUCK!!!*** -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 01:03, March 27, 2011 (UTC) GTFO my wiki Lolwut? Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 01:09, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. (talk) 01:11, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Whiskey Tango Foxtrot? --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 01:57, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Well, this is pretty embarrassing, but this should have been deleted many, many months ago. Its ICU expired and Chiefjustice deleted the main page, but didn't delete any of the subpages. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:33, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Translation: QVFD, some admin delete it ASAP, regardless of time left. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:17, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

Airbourne (band)

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Delete. Here's the basis for the "jokes" 1) Tulips 2) Turnips 3) The band is gay. Never do we hit solid concept. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:57, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Satly orgasm. Intro tells you you don't care once; cites AC/DC twice. "Apparantly he is unable to get a hard on when looking at his wife, until he puts on scanty clothing and charges him $20 for a handjob." In other words, it doesn't get any better when you read on. Spıke ¬ 02:20 25-Mar-11 Okay. 1234 ~ 09:22, 26 March 2011
Comments

Dr. Skullthumper

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Keep. He runs Fnoodle and doesn't afraid of anything. (talk) 03:00, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)	He said anything could be VFDed. Cajek was VFDed. *shifty eyes* 1234 ~ 02:58, 26 March 2011 Delete. He introduced me to crack cocaine and ruined my life. --EMC [TALK] 03:06 Mar 26 2011 Delete. Because lol - Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 03:13, March 26, 2011 (UTC) Delete Because I'm 'zany'. mAttlobster. (hello) 08:31, March 26, 2011 (UTC) Delete. For calling me a git and telling me to "use my head". --Scofield 11:07, March 26, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I, for one, will miss him. Aleister 22:34 26-3-'11
Comments	Lyrithya, as a poopsmith and a temp op, you really shouldn't be making nominations like this. I expected better behavior out of you. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 18:56, March 26, 2011 (UTC) Better behaviour? Love, from you, what does that even mean? At any rate, if poopsmithiness or adminniness can only involve seriousness, then I'd want nothing to do with any of it, and nothing to do with those who do, for what place do they have here? This is not a serious wiki, and this is not a serious response, and this is not a serious concern. Please consult your batmoose next time. 1234 ~ 22:19, 26 March 2011 Hey guys, I found a picture of Dex. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 00:23 Mar 27, 2011 I could stand all the joke bans, but this joke VFD nomination is a major fuckup. This experiment has failed. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:35, March 27, 2011 (UTC) Yeah, man. I remember when people didn't treat this wiki as one big fucking joke, you know? I'm sick of these motherfucking tempops on this motherfucking wiki. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 00:45 Mar 27, 2011

World War 0

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	How? I wonder how this got away... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 01:32, March 26, 2011 (UTC) Delete. There is a nonsense number in the title and, despite being well-written, nothing to grab onto in the randomness of the article's text. Spıke ¬ 01:36 26-Mar-11 poop --Roman Dog Bird 01:51, March 26, 2011 (UTC) Oh, come on... that's not even trying. 1234 ~ 08:59, 26 March 2011  Burninate! How many wacky wars do we need? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 02:29, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

You are now Logged out

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Amuses the me by pranking the this is funny. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:16, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Not much there. Is there really a point? --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 00:22, March 26, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Amuses the author by pranking the reader. Spıke ¬ 00:24 26-Mar-11 Technically, this is an invalid nom due to the lacking age, however the article is of such a nature that maintenance tags would serve no purpose, considering as the the whole point is the shortness, and they'd be just as contestable as outright deletion. Anyway, I'm really not amused. 1234 ~ 09:05, 26 March 2011 Delete. Lame in-joke. Very lame. --Scofield 11:13, March 26, 2011 (UTC) Piss. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 12:59, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Though lyrithya also has a point about this being an invalid nom. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:17, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

King of the Hill

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Look at the mirror. This article is so very perverse, and is virtually about nothing. If It lives, someone edit protect it against IP's. God, I hate IP's; they're frigging annoying. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 21:48, March 25, 2011 (UTC) fuuuuuuccccckkkkkkkk --Roman Dog Bird 22:09, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Built on a bad foundation in Uncyclopedia's childhood, this article could not escape it's rotten roots and has only expanded into badness. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:39, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Nominator is the only registered user who has worked on this all year. (Oddly, it got in its present state with no help from Bhind45.) If he is throwing in the towel, it should go. Spıke ¬ 22:51 25-Mar-11 No to both of them, please. 1234 ~ 09:08, 26 March 2011 --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 12:58, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	There is an alternate version that I did on the mirror. It could be longer with more images, but someone take a look and see if it is better (it isn't as bad and is, frankly, slightly factual). --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 23:44, March 25, 2011 (UTC) The mainspace article is about to die. You will be free to roll in a better one (not another version of the same one in spite of the unanimous vote!)--and, in my opinion, an article that has something to do with facts cannot avoid being better. Spıke ¬ 23:52 25-Mar-11 I'll post it if when the article is deleted. It's a rough start, but I think it will due. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 23:57, March 25, 2011 (UTC) This is substantially the same article, a bit better taken care of, minus most of the photos. I didn't dig in in detail. The problem with the current article is that it describes a funny TV show and its only basis of additional humor is to show us what the author thinks, such as cut-downs. Do you claim the mirror version has a better comedy concept? I don't see it. Spıke ¬ 00:13 26-Mar-11 No, just less perverse. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? Then I think you should not roll it in after the delete without taking things in a significant new direction. Spıke ¬ 00:23 26-Mar-11 Anyhow, I have bad luck with reposting things... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 00:25, March 26, 2011 (UTC) Yes, I think posting here to get us all to read this, followed by restoring essentially the same thing, will quickly lead to a spate of bad luck. Spıke ¬ 00:36 26-Mar-11

Knapford

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Unfunny without any hope of redemption. 21:40, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Starving for content. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:45, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Imagine, a chav's guide to author's home town--a town that is kind of charming to him, and if reader can't figure out why--well, he makes the place seem totally unremarkable to me. Spıke ¬ 22:47 25-Mar-11 ALL HAIL THE MIGHTY LIST!!! --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 00:00, March 26, 2011 (UTC) --Roman Dog Bird 01:54, March 26, 2011 (UTC) Lacking redeeming value. 1234 ~ 09:09, 26 March 2011 Obliterate. We could Pay 'n Spray it, but it probably wouldn't make it any better... -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 11:56, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

KANAR

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Stub about some role-playing organisation which looks like vanity to me. 21:34, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Roll save vs. huffing. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:37, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete. A private role-playing club in southeastern Michigan wants its own Uncyclopedia article (which isn't even any good) to hump traffic to its own web site. Spıke ¬ 22:33 25-Mar-11 Delete. This is just an advertisement attempting to be humorous. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 23:46, March 25, 2011 (UTC) What... 1234 ~ 09:10, 26 March 2011
Comments

California State Polytechnic University Pomona

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Huh? Is it just me, or is this page nothing but vanity? It's unfunny, tedious and solely written by one person (who calls himself Csupomona). I'd QVFD this, but I'm not sure how notable the subject might be. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 12:00, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I don't see overt vanity, just a collection of randomness, starting with the junk assertion that CSU is in New Mexico. Any of this that is a coded reference to something that actually happens at CSU doesn't make it notable to anyone on the outside. Spıke ¬ 12:36 25-Mar-11 Delete. Nobody cares. 21:27, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Went downhill fast. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:17, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Yes. 1234 ~ 09:17, 26 March 2011
Comments

The Tea Monster

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. I always feel a bit wary when considering an article with the "overly British" template on it for deletion but if this thing is funny in Britain this shit is England's problem, not mine. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:39, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Tea is British. This article is dumb; of the genre: Create a character and ramble on about him. Again, no reason to use the first person and Q-and-A format. The {{British}} template, or any other that explains the alleged humor, coaches the reader, or protects itself from edit or deletion, breaks the encyclopedia canon without delivering benefit. Spıke ¬ 12:40 25-Mar-11  Propane! It's short and unfunny, like an angry midget. Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 02:10, March 26, 2011 (UTC) Templates. 1234 ~ 09:19, 26 March 2011  Burninate! It makes no sense. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 12:00, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Category:EMERGENCY SATANIKAT WATCH!

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Eat a bucket of dicks, useless category! --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:30, March 25, 2011 (UTC) ?????? Holy ear-piercing Emergency Alert System, Batman! They turned off our show for this!? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 12:12, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Junk category used only on one user page, by a user who can't even get a photo to render on the category page. Spıke ¬ 12:32 25-Mar-11 Yep (talk) 19:29, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 19:45, March 25, 2011 (UTC)  Propane! One of the rare occasions randomness has made me laugh. This must be deleted by propane explosion, courtesy of Hank Hill. Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 02:13, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Charlie Sheen

Score: -6
Keep (7)	Keep. Previous versions are not too bad. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:19, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Keep, though crummy. The most notorious current case of a person destroying his own life in full public view requires an Uncyclopedia page. It is low-lying fruit for someone to give this article comedy value-added. Currently, the article is mostly cheap shots and randumbo. Spıke ¬ 11:24 25-Mar-11 Really? This is my second vfd of the month. I know it's not feature-worthy or anything, but it's not that bad. Up to the random second half, which I didn't bother rewriting, it's little more than a regurgitation of his quotes and that's all I think it really needs to be. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:12, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Keep. As Dexter would say: why is this here? (talk) 19:38, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Naaaaw. Also, you people are really weird. 1234 ~ 00:12, 26 March 2011 Keep.. Good, media-inspired concept. Everyone loves a winning warlock! Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 01:40, March 26, 2011 (UTC) Keep. What the hell is wrong with you? --Scofield 11:10, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. Useless, and we have to many retrospective pages. I was considering putting this on VFD Gen. Fudgem0bile Head-butt unicorns 11:12, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Revert to a previous version.--Count of Monkey Crisco 11:18, March 25, 2011 (UTC) And attach {{VFD}} (both now done). Spıke ¬ 11:24 25-Mar-11 Kept. 1234 ~ 12:06, 26 March 2011

Dish Monster

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. There's sort of a concept here, bad roommates who filch your food, but it's never really developed. Everything else in this article is substandard. From humor to grammar to the MSPaint illustration improperly framed this is a showcase of ineptitude. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:02, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Article is a vehicle for coded references to a housemate who doesn't clean up after himself. That's all it does. Spıke ¬ 11:18 25-Mar-11 Delete before TOOTHY MOUTH becomes an Uncyclopedia in-joke... -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 12:42, March 25, 2011 (UTC) What? Is this random enough? Quick! Press the red button, Mr. President! --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 01:19, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Category:People who kidnapped Harry Potter

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Delete. Category is not funny and does not categorize. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:57, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete. This one is kind of stupid. Aleister 2:12 25-3-'11 Delete. Don't need this (talk) 02:14, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Bozo the Clown did? NAMBLA did? Spıke ¬ 02:16 25-Mar-11 Delete. Huh? Pup 02:50 25 Mar '11 Delete Blimey. mAttlobster. (hello) 09:24, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:48, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Dr. Penny

Score: 5
Keep (4)	I just found the true meaning of life. --Scofield 17:25, March 24, 2011 (UTC) Keep MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:07, March 24, 2011 (UTC) Keep She's a doctor. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:53, March 24, 2011 (UTC) bollocks. The article clearly establishes HIM as a DUDE. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 21:15, March 24, 2011 (UTC) "He is not a man" See the nature of Dr. Penny is fascinating. We should study and document it. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:23, March 24, 2011 (UTC) Actually a pretty good concept, as least semi-intelligent. Aleister 1:55 25-3-'11
Delete (9)	Delete. WTF? pillow talk 11:19, March 24, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Bad penny. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:44, March 24, 2011 (UTC)  Burninate! Short and pointless. Love the image, though. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 11:49, March 24, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Thanks to Aleister, this is now a lame attempt to write a story around an animation. Before, it was a lame attempt to write a story around nothing. Spıke ¬ 12:08 24-Mar-11 Obliterate. (talk) 19:46, March 24, 2011 (UTC) GPS - Gay Penis Sex --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:48, March 24, 2011 (UTC) When I'm here, it is because I am not trying to feed my brain through an I say blender. 1234 ~ 22:31, 24 March 2011 Delete. This is really inane and unfunny. 21:29, March 25, 2011 (UTC)  Propane! I'v been saying "Whiskey Tango Foxtrot" ever since I read that. Wait, what's to read?!? Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 01:44, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Why does every page with Spinning Abe sucks? --~  20:04, March 24, 2011 (UTC) Because suck is attracted to motion and bright colours. 1234 ~ 22:31, 24 March 2011 oh... --~  08:38, March 25, 2011 (UTC)

Lipsonia

Score: -3
Keep (5)	Keep. It just barely holds together, has a few slightly funny lines.--Count of Monkey Crisco 19:49, March 23, 2011 (UTC) Keep Gotta say I see no reason to delete this. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:16, March 24, 2011 (UTC) More at issue is the terrible formatting, than anything else. And we have... things... for that. 1234 ~ 07:39, 24 March 2011 Keep The best Lipsonia article on Uncyclopediarer. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:23, March 24, 2011 (UTC) Strong keep. I suggest it. DJ Mixerr 02:10, March 25, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig
Delete (2)	Delete. Irritating fantasy Soviet state. 17:55, March 23, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Lipsonia "has more nuclear power plants than non-mutant people" and travelers get "a disease that hasn't even been discovered yet." Don't see a point or a payback from using the Q&A format instead of encyclopedic. Not even interesting in the wake of the Japanese mishap. Spıke ¬ 19:09 23-Mar-11
Comments	Apparently kept. 1234 ~ 00:10, 26 March 2011

Charmed

Score: -1
Keep (4)	Keep. This article is listy fancruft, but it has complete sentences and paragraphs, and its tone is to ridicule its subject with apparent objectivity rather than simply assert that I Think This Shit Is Shitty. Nominator Bhind45 could learn from it. Spıke ¬ 12:20 22-Mar-11 Terrible, but perhaps not terrible enough. 1234 ~ 07:33, 24 March 2011 Keep Spike's hit the nail on the head. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:29, March 24, 2011 (UTC) Keep. (talk) 00:19, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. Listy fancruft indeed. Makes fun of the subject without being particularly funny. -- 15:55, March 22, 2011 (UTC)  Burninate! It is better than a certain "shitty shit" article, but it seems to rely solely on fancruft. Also it uses stale jokes like "That Chick Who Played On knickknack Who Nobody Knows..." -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 02:54, March 24, 2011 (UTC) Kerkill Horrible. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 02:13, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. I'm not voting until this thing officially starts, chronologically speaking. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:38, March 22, 2011 (UTC) Kept. 1234 ~ 12:07, 26 March 2011

The Breakfast Club

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Older versions were not funny, newer version are a dire mess of pop culture cruft and lists.--Count of Monkey Crisco 07:46, March 24, 2011 (UTC) Delete. You can't develop a comedy concept if you can't carry a thought beyond one line of text. Spıke ¬ 11:10 24-Mar-11 Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:55, March 24, 2011 (UTC) Unless I'm seriously missing something here, and from the looks of things I ain't, that's just... random. 1234 ~ 22:26, 24 March 2011 The Breakfast Club is a classic movie and ripe for ridicule. This is not a ridicule of a classic movie. Pup 02:55 25 Mar '11 Bye As the toddlers say: bye-bye wee wee, bye-bye poo poo! -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 03:00, March 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete. First, the article tries to frame the founders of the Breakfast Club as cereal killers, then as Reagan protesters. It successfully does neither, and goes from nowhere to listville. Simsilikesims 06:25, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Baby recycling

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Keep Just because it's short doesn't mean it's bad. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:33, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Delete. Short and unfunny artice, as well as a case of borderline tag abuse. pillow talk 05:17, March 24, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 07:56, March 24, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. This manages to be offensive and stupid at the same time. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 10:59, March 24, 2011 (UTC) Weak delete. Adequate concept; quotes and intro are okay but body of the article is mostly meme-cruft. Too short, only a token illustration. Not worked on since a userspacing tussle in 2007. Spıke ¬ 11:08 24-Mar-11 Per SPIKE. --Scofield 17:26, March 24, 2011 (UTC) Not going anywhere. 1234 ~ 22:23, 24 March 2011
Comments

Camel

Score: -4
Keep (5)	Keep Hump mAttlobster. (hello) 21:22, March 23, 2011 (UTC) Weak keep. Terrible article that contains some pretty funny stuff, like the "palindromedary" camel with two heads. I like this more than a blank page as a starting point. pillow talk 22:26, March 23, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Lots of good stuff in here, despite a horrible start. Spıke ¬  23:04 23-Mar-11 Keep. Plenty of potential here - Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB Cleanup, not delete. There be stuff there; may as well keep it on the off chance someone can use it. 1234 ~ 22:22, 24 March 2011
Delete (1)	EXTERMINATE! My animosity to this article has only grown since the edit filter prevented me adding a {{vfd}} tag. 21:18, March 23, 2011 (UTC) Done for you. The line starting with the number 4 was the culprit (I changed it to "four"). The spam filter is not always right, but it always tells you what it was it didn't like. Spıke ¬ 23:12 23-Mar-11
Comments	Kept. 1234 ~ 22:42, 24 March 2011

H.G. Wells

Score: -4
Keep (5)	Keep. Needs some touch up for sure, but you may need to read a synopsis of Wells' "Time Machine" or see the old movie from the 1960's. Aleister 19:55 23-3-'11 Keep. Per Aleister. This is actually quite a clever concept. 20:56, March 23, 2011 (UTC) It... fits. 1234 ~ 07:41, 24 March 2011 Keep. It should be kept. Made a few changes to correct literals/spellings and making better sense of what is otherwise a pretty good idea. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:52, March 24, 2011 (UTC) A man, a plan, a canal, Romartus! Aleister 11:17 24-3-'11 Keep. --~  20:08, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. Makes. No. Fucking. Sense. --Scofield 19:48, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment.Repaired, edited and can now go to the ball. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:01, March 24, 2011 (UTC) Comment. Damn, I knew I'd forgotten the VFD tag! --Scofield 13:35, March 24, 2011 (UTC) Kept. 1234 ~ 22:20, 24 March 2011

Final Fantasy Aleph-null

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Only real joke is that the company which makes Final Fantasy has ran out of natural numbers for their games...which is kind of meh. 17:53, March 23, 2011 (UTC) Delete. The unfinished game article is replete with red-links and nonsense numbers; indeed, because a nonsense number is its reason to exist. Agreed, that's its only real joke. Spıke ¬ 19:02 23-Mar-11 Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 19:50, March 23, 2011 (UTC) Delete. For referring to them as Square Enix (I never did like Enix games, and the merger ruined the Final Fantasy franchise). Seriously, this is just another unfunny FF article. I think we should just redirect them all to something else and lock them until someone rebuilds them. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 02:31, March 24, 2011 (UTC) This is no actually funny. Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)Leave me alone... 06:20, March 24, 2011 On one hand, it has a joke. On the other hand, it manages to be even worse than the usual FF article... 1234 ~ 07:37, 24 March 2011
Comments