Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnBooks:The Frogs

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

UnBooks:The Frogs (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: UnBooks:The Frogs	Score: 14
Nominated by:	Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 05:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
For: 19	Nom and for. I didn't actually read it, but I'm assuming that it's hilarious. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 05:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC) Yeah Didn't read it either, but I think it's great. Would read again. Also, since it's released under a Creative Commons license, I'm going to edit in a bunch of references to kitten huffing. Because I can. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 05:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC) Okay, I'm going to hold off on voting until I actually read it. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 17:08, 28 July 2008 (UTC) Ribbit I read it, it's hilarious, and absolutely awesome. The guy who wrote this is really a totally annoying douchebag...I mean, great guy. Also - ribbit. Love,   lolwut -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 12:09, 28 July 2008 (UTC) Brilliant. ~~Heeren ["Meh"] [tecħ] [kurk] [28/07 16:20] Noice --Nytrospawn 16:21, 28 July 2008 (UTC) Satisfying - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 16:32, Jul 28 Sparta and I'm putting in more words here so as to avoid that whole "one word vote" bit. Or maybe I'm just bored. Ж WHEEEEE! 16:48, 28 July 2008 (UTC) Screw you, Universe!!! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:30, Jul 28 Amazing. DrS, you are one talented motherfucker. sirsysrq @ 21:41 Jul 28 I hope the sequel's tagline goes along the lines of "Mark Flavian has been fucked by the universe. At last, it's finally time... for him to fuck back." (In bold, because movie trailer announcer guy speaks in bold.) - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:16, Jul 28 Genius - Absolute fucking genius! - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 00:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC) Indubitably one of the best articles I've ever not finished reading. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 00:19, 29 July 2008 (UTC) The Universe can kiss my ass. I read the whole thing. ☭» Comrade DJ Gentoo, defending the proletariat. FOR THE MOTHERLAND! 18:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC) Christ, how long has this been here? I really should start paying closer attention. Anyways, I've been reading this on a certain blog and it's just as good here. That would be a For. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:17, 30 Jul Definitely. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:09, 3 August 2008 (UTC) For I can't believe I just read that whole thing. This is Uncyclopedia after all, I can usually click a link, read an article, and go back to vote on it without being logged out due to inactivity. None of that makes me bitter enough to vote otherwise though. Solid writing. -RAHB 12:53, 3 August 2008 (UTC) For Fou-Lu 19:39, 3 August 2008 (UTC)  For per Ethine. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:40 Aug 05, 2008 wow. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:31, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Against: 5	Against It's kinda funny. But it doesn't have pictures, and, without pictures, it looks like walls of boring text. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 05:29, 28 July 2008 (UTC) Still against Am I breaking some sort of rule? Good. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 06:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC) No, just my heart: </3 – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 06:16 Jul 28, 2008 Against; Wonderful prose. Terrible formatting. You might consider requesting some decent image for it. -- The Zombiebaron 12:12, 28 July 2008 (UTC) Against tl;dr... Actually I read this ages ago (a few times)... I do really like it, but I don't think it works as a feature. MrN 13:46, Jul 28  Against. - As per MrN9000--Sycamore (Talk) 14:45, 28 July 2008 (UTC)  Against. per DJ Irreverent. I'm speaking here for all of us with ADHD, this is too long for a feature (You should totally make a cliff notes version, and I might vote for that).--<<>> 12:22, 30 July 2008 (UTC)  Against. Nice, but I didn't find it funny. OrangeAipom 00:19, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain Funny but goes on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on... --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 06:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC) Abstain and evil grin – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 05:01 Jul 28, 2008 Abstain. Per Boomer though I noticed there was no links or pictures. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 05:26 28 July 2008 Bonus update! Now contains seven, count 'em, seven, pictures! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 05:50 Jul 28, 2008 And I found a link. Insidentally just read the first part, very entertaining. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 06:03 28 July 2008 Why thx. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 06:16 Jul 28, 2008 Abstain. I abstained on that last thing Mooses did before vanishing for similar reasons: it's a hell of a read, but I'm not sure it's right in this format. It took me 5 goes to finish this on Skull's blog - I get headaches trying to read something that long on the screen. Then the voices start, which is another worry. Anyway, as a short story, I love it. As an article on Uncyclopedia, I don't know. --UU - natter 14:59, Jul 29 That one mooses did was epic... it was also only about a quarter of the length of this. This would work as a short story but just doesn't translate that well into an article. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 05:37, 30 July 2008 (UTC) Which is why it's not an article, it's an UnBook. </potstirring> – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 06:06 Jul 30, 2008 as per DJ. ~ Mgr.ReadMeSoon!? 23:49, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

---

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.

---