Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive172

Smex

Keep
Delete	Delete. Random, listy, odd, next to no edits since '07, not linked, won't be missed, get rid. --UU - natter 11:27, Feb 12 weird. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:03, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Dumb. Contains South Park memes. pillow talk 16:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 16:19, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:12, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. --Mnb'z 19:26, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Shiznit

Keep
Delete	Delete. Stubby 2005cruft thing with pretty much no edits since, no links to it and no point. And it's shite. --UU - natter 11:19, Feb 12 gross. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:02, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Ebonicscruft is so over. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 16:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Anyone want to give me a fucking eyerape warning? ...assholes. pillow talk 16:17, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 19:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete --Mnb'z 19:42, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete Oh, yea. Delete it! MrN 23:04, Feb 12
Comments	That's why it's best not to comment on UU's mum... MrN 20:18, Feb 12 Huh? --UU - natter 20:36, Feb 12 "Stubby 2005cruft thing with pretty much no edits since, no links to it and no point. And it's shite" *shudder* ;) MrN 21:24, Feb 12

Anderson "The Spider" Silva

Keep
Delete	Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:11, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete --Mnb'z 06:17, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Oh boy, that's a long and dull bit of UFC fancruft... --UU - natter 10:11, Feb 12 delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:59, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:05, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Urgh. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 16:12, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:06, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Arthur Read

Keep
Delete	Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:11, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete --Mnb'z 06:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. And move to Simsilikesims's userspace, as he's spent some time on it. --UU - natter 09:56, Feb 12 delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Get rid of this! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. I kind of like it, but all the same...Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 16:12, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Comment - Since it is tagged with {{Ugly}} - should this be here?--Sycamore (Talk) 17:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

The Free Advice Man

Keep	keep (notice its a lower case keep?) Send it to my name space so I can do a rewrite next week. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 14:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. What the fuck? Random block o'text for all I can see. --UU - natter 12:05, Feb 11 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Userspace per P.P.'s request. --Mnb'z 17:04, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Yea. MrN 23:29, Feb 11
Comments	Move to User:Prettiestpretty/The Free Advice Man please? MrN 21:05, Feb 11

Template:Armageddon

Keep
Delete	Delete comment template, 10 times bigger than it needs to be. (Well, it would be if should exist in the first place) --Mnb'z 07:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Wayyy too big. And pointless. And as I may have observed before, I'm happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter 11:38, Feb 11 Destroy this template! Before it destroys us! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC) AHH!!! -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:59, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. MrN 23:11, Feb 11
Comments

Template:Gaylevel

Keep
Delete	Wasn't this deleted already? -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:41, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	I knew I should have just deleted it myself....I'm still new at this. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:56, 11 February 2009 (UTC) S'alright. Just remember: Under a week old, delete or ICU; over a week, VFD. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:La Liga

Keep
Delete	Delete sectional template that looks like it's link rotted, but there wasn't anything to this to begin with. Filled with nonlinks and random padding. --Mnb'z 17:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC) As per soulreaping Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 18:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Delete as per Mnbvcxz. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 19:58, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Delete MrN 20:15, Feb 11 Whatever. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Thomas Bayley

Keep
Delete	Delete. Vanity. It's gotta be. And it's dull, unfunny vanity that has been here far too long. Get rid. --UU - natter 14:04, Feb 11 EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 14:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Should be QVFD probably, since its vanity. --Mnb'z 17:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Delete VFD is the correct place for this, not QVFD. We do allow some vanity, it just needs to be REALLY funny. This does not make the required grade. MrN 20:14, Feb 11 No comment. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

The first 327 megatoads

Keep
Delete	Delete. This was created as an extension of a page called "Megatoad" which has since been deleted. It is the same damn picture repeated over and over with different names. And a paragraph or so of unfunny text at the start. Can it go? Please? --UU - natter 12:12, Feb 11 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:21, 11 February 2009 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:28, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. --Mnb'z 17:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Delete.. I might vote to keep it if it hadn't lost its context when megatoad went away. pillow talk 19:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Satan Approved

Keep	Keep. ~ 08:17, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. Per PP's comment last time. Many templates should die due to pointlessness, but this one is part of the charm of this site for some people, ugly thing though it may be. There are things out there more deserving of deletion. --UU - natter 11:36, Feb 11 Keep the template, but do not worship Satan! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 14:07, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Keep Well, we allow Jesus to have one, and we don't want to be accused of favouritism. MrN 20:11, Feb 11
Delete	Delete. corny clutter. I'm sure Satan wouldn't approve of this template. --Mnb'z 05:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. I'm Satan, and I don't approve of anything whatsoever.  c • > • cunwapquc? 08:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	It was on VFD before, but that was over 2 years ago. --Mnb'z 05:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Conditional For. It should be changed a bit. For one thing, I don't like the image. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:22, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Kept. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Emperor of America

Keep
Delete	Delete. bullshit succession list, that has fouled up several articles. Basically the little brother of the mythical presidents template. --Mnb'z 17:12, 10 February 2009 (UTC) Go away dumb list. Go away! pillow talk 20:37, 10 February 2009 (UTC) delete. i always hated this... SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:55, 10 February 2009 (UTC) delete. MrN 11:25, Feb 11 Delete. Happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter 11:29, Feb 11 Delete. We have enough of this stuff already. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:26, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Delete This is the type of BS that drives me nutz. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 14:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Funny?

Keep	Semi-weak-somewhat-strong-but-not-in-the-middle keep We need one like this. plzplzplz? I'd help but all I can do is make the colour sexier. 8D (Oh yeah, by the way, my favourite colour is chartreuse. ._______.) Aww hot damn, it's Sofia. Bitch at me here. ;] 03:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC) I nominated this for deletion because it is an insulting wanna-be rewrite/fix tag. If you find a page that this should go on, you should put a proper rewrite or fix tag on it. This one doesn't categorize the page its placed on, and it insults the reader. If the rewrite or fix tag doesn't give enough information, say something on the talk page.--Mnb'z 05:29, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. wannabe maintenance tag that is a bit too insulting. This should be replaced by proper rewrite or fix tags. --Mnb'z 05:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Yuck. 23:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. I can't think when this should be used. MrN 23:10, Feb 6 Delete Per nom. He makes a good point. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 18:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC) delete. bad templates = bad. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:04, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Bad colors -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	I never really thought of this as a serious maintenance template. Any objections to userfication? --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 21:56, 10 February 2009 (UTC) Oops, I see that it was deleted while I was writing that comment. A little help please...? --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 21:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC) Ask RAHB MrN 22:04, Feb 10

White Nile

Keep	Keep Not all stubs are bad. MrN 16:00, Feb 6 It's keepable. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:08, 6 February 2009 (UTC) weeeeeaaaaakkkk keep. just enough humor:length ratio for me. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Weak keep. Possible candidate for an expand tag? --UU - natter 09:26, Feb 10 Keep. Just needs a few additions. I recommend this for a colonization, not an expansion, as the stuff that's currently there is good enough to not delete out of flagrant not-caringness. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:40, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. IronLung 03:55, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. per above. --Mnb'z 05:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Unfunny crapstub. That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario! 23:07, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. ~SirTagstit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 22:43, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	This looks to stubby to keep, unless someone is planning on expanding it. Most of its size comes from the river and vfd templates. --Mnb'z 16:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?? It's been around since 2006, but never been vandalised. It's kinda funny, and not stupid. Most importantly... It's not going to stop anyone else from doing a better job if they want to. It's short, but not crap. Totally unlike my craps. MrN 23:09, Feb 6 Abstain per by bandwagon keepism. Although, I do worry about a stub this short being a "bad example" to noobs. --Mnb'z 06:01, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Yea, I hear you on the bad example thing. That's the reason why I went on my short pages massacre last year. We really used to have some old short shit articles stinking up the place.... The thing is, we do allow stubs to be created (even now) we are just more strict about them. This article might have been ICUd or maybe {{expand}} if created now, but I would like to think it might have made it through our new article quality controls... I think probably my main reason for deciding to fight for this one is because its about a very notable subject. I just think we are better with with this kinda thing than not... MrN 13:22, Feb 7 Kept. ~ 08:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Noob Approved

Keep
Delete	Delete another unused template that survived QVFD. --Mnb'z 07:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Complete gob of shite--    09:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter 09:43, Feb 10 gross. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. MrN 20:24, Feb 10
Comments

Criscomedia

Keep
Delete	Delete No idea, could be lots of things, but it's not good. MrN 00:33, Feb 10 Delete. Indeed, it's not good. pillow talk 06:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC) Delete per above. --Mnb'z 06:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Boy, was that an easy call. --UU - natter 09:42, Feb 10 not delicious. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:18, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Rhodri the Great

Keep
Delete	Delete Oh Dear. MrN 00:25, Feb 10 Delete fails the notability standards by a wide margin, and random as hell. --Mnb'z 06:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Listy, dull, and I really didn't see anything worthwhile in it. --UU - natter 09:41, Feb 10 groan. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. It's a real person, and honestly, a little funny in places. pillow talk 06:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Is the bear a Catholic?

Keep	Keep "It's Not Such a Bad Little Article. Maybe all it needs is a little love. Please show this article some love by improving it" Does the bear shit in the woods? Is the Pope a catholic? MrN 13:08, Feb 8 KEEP! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:13, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. --Mnb'z 00:58, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. Improveabubble. --UU - natter 09:40, Feb 10 keep. i will personally adopt this one. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete.. Random stub. IronLung 08:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Kept -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Democratic People's Republic of Mindanao

Keep	Keep+Rewrite/hard. It has something going for it, but it needs to be rewritten, HARD. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:24, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. It's a real place. The article is not Uncyclopedia:Complete Bollocks, so it gets a {{rewrite}}. MrN 13:35, Feb 8 Delete. Needs much work, but it better get it. If it ends up here in this state again, my vote will be less generous. --UU - natter 09:39, Feb 10 weak keep per MnN. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:12, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Nom and Huff I fail to get the points of the jokes here if there's any, it appears to be a spork from another Encyclopedia. I also noted the Suguestion below and felt that it need to be voted on here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 05:55, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain leaning toward delete This subject is rather obscure even though it is based on a real entity. I don't think it could be rewritten except by a native of the Philippines or someone with unusually high knowledge of the the subject. --Mnb'z 00:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Kept -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Mindanao

Keep
Delete	Strong delete arcane incoherent jibber-jabbery, I believe this is a meaningless comment template, although I can't really tell, it might just be pure randomness. --Mnb'z 04:05, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Yep Huffable Cruft —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 05:58, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Delete and substitute it on Democratic People's Republic of Mindanao. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:22, 8 February 2009 (UTC) delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. And subst. --UU - natter 09:35, Feb 10
Comments	Abstain. It's only on one article: Democratic People's Republic of Mindanao. And that article sucks enough that this shitty template doesn't really drag the article down. So we can either leave things as they are, or we can transclude it onto the page and delete it. And quite honestly, I don't give a shit. pillow talk 04:10, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Compromise suggestion How about, somebody nominates that article for VFD, we delete it, then we QVFD this template for being unused? But, I don't see how the non-use of the template is a reason for keeping it. We should delete it so that it doesn't get spammed by some noob. --Mnb'z 04:26, 8 February 2009 (UTC) {{Sofixit}} However I already did it. You can vote for the article to be huffed above. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 05:58, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Tom Delonge

Keep	Keep I think it can be fixed. Keeping is better than deleting, and getting something worse. MrN 14:45, Feb 8 Keep per above. --Mnb'z 00:16, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	DEL-FUCKING-ETE This is a load of crap. Plus the thing about the pubes and the used scalpel made me cringe. Aww hot damn, it's Sofia. Bitch at me here. ;] 03:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Delete' per above. --Mnb'z 05:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Not funny. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:33, 7 February 2009 (UTC) delete. uegh, can't get much worse than this. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Bandcruft. Identikit bandcruft. Don't see much to improve - a blank canvas would do just as well. --UU - natter 09:33, Feb 10 Delete. There see? I admit it. I was wrong. I didn't notice that it was pants... MrN 20:36, Feb 10
Comments

Template:Iraq

Keep	Weak Keep I don't know I like this version better than {{Commonwealth}}, since it is a ripoff of it Do a history merge. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 06:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Good enough. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:34, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. semi-unused bullshit national sectional template, rip off on {{Commonwealth}}. This isn't that bad in itself. However, most nations would have a real national sectional template, this one, and others like it, gives the same information but more confusingly, disorderly, and with some tired attempts at humor.--Mnb'z 16:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Yea! MrN 23:13, Feb 6 Not really worth keeping. Delete. pillow talk 00:05, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Delete.Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC) shock & awe. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:05, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Kay -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Pointless. Get rid. --UU - natter 09:28, Feb 10
Comments	There is also a template {{Germany}} and a {{Usacountry}} that have the same info as the {{Commonwealth}} template. --Mnb'z 15:26, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Each of those Templates are funny to a degree, we can always merge them and use the Random Title for the header since there redundant to each other already. All this is making the {{Commonwealth}} version look like crap. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 18:57, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Furbish

Keep	Make this an Undictionary entry. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:11, 6 February 2009 (UTC) If the Undictionary entry mentions George W. Bush or anal sex, I will fuck you up. pillow talk 00:04, 7 February 2009 (UTC) I'd like to see you try. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Be careful what you wish for, Sockpuppet. I'm bubbling over with PWN these days. pillow talk 19:02, 9 February 2009 (UTC) So I've learned... through my categorizing ways. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 19:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Stupid, unfunny leftovers from ages past. That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario! 15:38, 5 February 2009 (UTC) VFD equation #31: George W. Bush + anal sex = delete. pillow talk 18:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC) delete. ugh. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Kerkill Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:46, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:43, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. ~SirTagstit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 22:43, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Crap. --UU - natter 09:23, Feb 10
Comments	I think this was on the mainpage as a "word of the day" at one point. At least that is what the template says. --S'r Mnbvcxz 18:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC) That doesn't mean it's funny or useful. It hasn't been touched in three years, and I'm sure our standards were different then (if we ever had any). That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario! 19:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Quangle

Keep	Weak keep Short but sweet.-- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 19:22, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete Unfunny leftovers from 2006. That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario! 20:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Delete I missed what Hyper was talking about obviously... MrN 00:05, Feb 5 Delete I dun get it. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 03:37, 5 February 2009 (UTC) delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Delete Way too short ~SirTagstit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 22:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. I get it. It's a Your Mom joke. How amusing. --UU - natter 09:18, Feb 10
Comments	Abstain. It's too short, it doesn't look like an article, and it's highly derivative of South Park's "Marklar." But, damn it, it's pretty funny, too. pillow talk 22:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Abstain. I didn't miss what Hyperbole was talking about. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:09, 5 February 2009 (UTC) You guys get of the dam fence! You will get splinters in your arse. If you think it's funny vote keep! MrN 00:13, Feb 5 It's too short and crappy to vote keep. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Abstain per above, love of fence sitting. --S'r Mnbvcxz 02:09, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Venezuelen trench-dwelling moose

Keep	Save the mooses! I've always wanted to say that. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:06, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Keep Made me giggle, so I added a couple of pics... MrN 23:39, Feb 8 Weak keep Needs...something...but I'm not sure what yet. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 05:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC) K33P I ♥ MOOSES!!! Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 19:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. Decent ~SirTagstit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 22:46, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. 15 edits in two years still haven't produced anything of merit. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain this appears to be random nonsense to me, why keep it. --Mnb'z 00:39, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Abstain. Not good, but inoffensive. pillow talk 00:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC) I'm going to sharpen the posts on that fence so you get splinters in your arse. MrN 00:55, Feb 9 Fortunately for me, my heavy denim pants cover my ass very nicely. limey bastard. pillow talk 05:09, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Comment - The images are nice, but they don't support the text. Here's the problem, we have an article that is languishing and needs someone to adopt it and love it. Adding images that don't mate with the text confuses it. I'm all for Moose - but if someone isn't going to do soemthing with this article about underwater moose, the it becomes a dust catcher. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC) I agree. The ideal solution would be for someone to find better ones, but that's time-consuming. I suppose you could always simply remove the offending mismatched ones, if you think that would (slightly) improve things. pillow talk 19:01, 9 February 2009 (UTC) I voted keep because I laughed reading it. Seriously, I really did. I love the way the author uses beautiful prose to ramble on giving us all the various details and specifications of this sub aquatic moose... It looks like something which someone might have attempted to get passed at Wikipedia but did not manage it. Agreed, we are not their trash bin but I make exceptions if I like the article enough, and this one I like. It's a bit like Japanese Stomping Fish which I'm also a fan of. Each to their own I guess... MrN 19:21, Feb 9 keept -RAHB 05:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Marshmellows

Keep
Delete	Delete. Its reason for life to tells us how Marshmellows are not Marshmallows; is this necessary? Note, article last edited in May of 2008. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 15:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. per above. --Mnb'z 22:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. OOOOH, I love sig number 4. It's like Mnb-Shizzle--    21:05, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Kinda pointless ~SirTagstit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 22:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. and just redirect to Marshmallows, already. I mean, really, all this page says is "HA, HA, YOU CAN'T SPELL. FUCK YOU." And if it's going to say that, it should say it more directly. pillow talk 23:01, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Actually I think the article is not that bad. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Deleted and redirected apparently. -RAHB 05:28, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:KaoruApproved

Keep
Delete	Delete completely unused but somehow survived QVFD. Its about a Japanese version of Buttercup from the powerpuff girls. Could we get any more obscure? --Mnb'z 19:14, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Speedy delete, orphaned template. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Hayat

Keep
Delete	Delete as nominator - apparent (old) copypaste of Brad. --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 03:26, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. I don't know its relation to Brad, but the word "Hayat" doesn't appear to refer to anything in particular (it's a disambiguation page on Wikipedia) and this is fantastically random and pointless. pillow talk 05:14, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Delete that's the most incoherent page I've seen in a while. --Mnb'z 05:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Delete it really should be in a Hall of Fame of sorts for articles that raise inane ideas to new heighths. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 14:25, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Delete Go on then... MrN 18:50, Feb 9 Delete. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Checking the discussion pages, it appears the original author wanted to move Brad to Hayat, but a copy-paste happened instead. --Mnb'z 19:28, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Booty

Keep
Delete	Delete it puts the article in both Category:Short and Category:Cleanup. You'd never know that from reading the template though. I don't think Category:short is a maintenance category, and Category:cleanup is a "fix this in 30 days or the article will be deleted" category. This template really doesn't any sense whatsoever, and he have a coherent {{cleanup}} template that does the same job. --Mnb'z 01:22, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Absolutely delete. Unfunny, ugly, and fucks up our categorization. pillow talk 05:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:28, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Delete Mnbvcxz has a good eye spotting this type of useless stuff, so nuke it. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:27, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Unnecessary. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC) D1337 Per the misspelling of thieves. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 19:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Jibbajabba

Keep	Keep I like this one. Also, it's Mr T for Christ's sake! Do you have no shame sir? Not really insulting maybe the wording could be improved a bit. MrN 01:08, Feb 9 Its a rouge "fix this" template though. I think that if we do keep it, it should be turned into a proper "rewrite" tag. Its more harshly worded than most rewrite tags. --Mnb'z 01:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. Another insulting wannabe rewrite template. If we want a Mr. T. themed rewrite template, this isn't it, its too insulting, and jibbers-jabbers too much.--Mnb'z 00:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Restore old Mr. T official rewrite template, delete this redundant template. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:28, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Restore+delete Yea, I looked for this in the rewrite template, but could not find it. MrN 09:56, Feb 9 Delete and restore per MrN9000. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	"I PITY THE FOO' THAT DOESN'T FIX THIS CRAP!" Someone help this sucka of a page by rewriting it. And make it drink its milk too. Only then can it join The A-Team. Old Mr. T. rewrite template. For some reason, it along with the Simon version, is currently blanked. (blanking was done by an admin) It might need some work, but we don't need this and the jibbajabba template. --Mnb'z 05:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Little Article

Keep	Strong Keep 70 articles? That would be because I regularly use this template. Rewrite suggests that there is something fundamentally wrong with the article which needs changing via a "rewrite". This template is nice way of saying that an article is OK, but it's just needs to be a bit longer. It simply encourages people reading the article to edit it. DO YOU THINK WE SHOULD DELETE {{stub}} ALSO? In addition, {{expand}} has a totally different purpose. {{expand}} has a 30 day stay of execution, and should only be used for new articles. This template does exactly the same thing as {{stub}} and I personally think that in many cases it's a much more effective way of passing on the same message. It does not add to a category as doing so would not be piratical. If I wanted the article to be added to a category I would use {{idea}}. 90% of our articles need some attention, should we put them all in a category? MrN 13:01, Feb 8 KEEP! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:17, 8 February 2009 (UTC) very keep--Sycamore (Talk) 14:47, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Keep Per the Poopsmith's comments. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 18:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete.. This template serves no purpose that Rewrite/soft cannot fulfil, and does not automatically add an article to a category for articles to be attended to. It is a confusing and pointless alternative to the rewrite tag that actually serves to prevent needy pages from getting help. There are seventy pages with this tag that might need our help, but no convenient way of accessing the list. I say let the rewrite template do the work. IronLung 08:23, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	I want to further add that many of these articles, where short, could be reclassified as stubs. IronLung 08:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Also, {{expand}}. IronLung 09:03, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Speedy Kept -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:49, 8 February 2009 (UTC) This is exactly what {tl|expand}} should be, btw. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 21:24, 08 Feb 2009 I do think this might need some auto-categorization though. I generally believe if an article is bad enough to have a "fix this" template on it, it should also go in some category so people can find it to fix. --Mnb'z 22:16, 8 February 2009 (UTC) How about "Category:Little Articles"? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Or... Category:Stuck_articles_needing_a_push, which is linked from here. Like I said, we have to draw the line somewhere. There is no point listing everything in a category. People don't even bother with Uncyclopedia:Ideas right now... MrN 22:22, Feb 8 Why not categorize it though? If those articles were in in one more category, would it hurt anything? --Mnb'z 22:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC) There is only so much editing effort to go around. Some articles need the extra attention more than others. We advertise some key categories in prominent places, and that's why they get the attention they do. When a user goes to say Category:rewrite they see a huge list of articles needing work. If we included say all the {{stub}} class of templates in a category (there are lots of different stub templates) then we would have a list with thousands of articles in it. A list with so many articles in it is less useful, as the attention is spread over a wider area. The point is to have a layered system which focus the editing effort we have where it is most needed. We use {{idea}} for the really good stubs, as we think that they have a good chance of becoming featured articles one day. This template works fine as a simple "edit me!" template for people who happen to find the page. We have to draw a line somewhere... I thought about this one myself a while back, and agreed with you for a while, but now I think things are best as they are. Also, we have Special:ShortPages. ;) MrN 23:05, Feb 8

Template:Pokemonwarning

Keep	I am deeply disturbed and/or aroused by seeing (certain) Pokémon! It's a serious issue. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:58, 31 January 2009 (UTC) I changed the text of the template to your vote. Revert if you want, but I think it makes it so much better. pillow talk 17:49, 31 January 2009 (UTC) I think your version is better, I updated the formatting some to get rid of the dead space. --Mnbvcxz 17:52, 31 January 2009 (UTC) Are the grammar errors intentional? --Pentium5dot1|t~^_^~c 00:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC) No, my grammar obtains to the good and strong, and your indictment of my usages of the grammar is insult and bad. Please enjoy at once, by all means. pillow talk 18:25, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Seriously though, we are not voting if this is funny in and off itself. (And an admin reverted it back to its original form) We are voting on whether is should be on several articles. I would agree its funny once, but its not funny 50 times. No "comment" template is. --Mnb'z 05:53, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Strong Keep This is a good template. One of the better classics. Don't delete it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 03:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. As a result of the VFD process, this one is undergoing a whole slew of edits, and I just don't feel like deleting it at this time is appropriate. It's like, if you're going to put your kid's puppy to sleep, you don't rip it out of his hands. You wait until the kid falls asleep and then tell him his dog ran away. pillow talk 16:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Weak keep It's randumb, but kind of amusing. Besides, we need to fill the void left by Wikipedia when they trimmed their Pokeman articles. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 17:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Weak keep-- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 19:11, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete meaningless warning template. (Unless somebody here is deeply disturbed by seeing Pokemon.) If deleting this is too hard on userspace, how about we exile it from mainspace? --Mnbvcxz 16:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC) Delete This is funny? MrN 01:10, Feb 1 Pokémon. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 18:28, Feb 2 Delete on the grounds that it encourages people to create more pokemon articles. Seriously, guys, just stop it. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 18:28, Feb 3 delete as per TLB, whoever that is. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Ultra-delete. Like, with knives and stuff. IronLung 19:08, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Okay, Spang apparently doesn't want this edited, and I sure as fuck don't want to edit-war with Spang. So I'm changing my vote to "kill with fire." pillow talk 23:15, 6 February 2009 (UTC) What. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 05:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Neh -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	I really don't think these "this article contains X" quasi-warning templates need to exist. They are just clutter. The purpose of a warning template is to warn the reader that there is a good chance they won't want to read the article. Really, what purpose does this serve? --Mnbvcxz 17:43, 31 January 2009 (UTC) Ok, its funny in a silly way. However, will it still be funny when you see the same new version of the template on the 50th pokemon article? I'd fully support code sub that on a few articles, but I don't think we need the dancing milk on each and every page about pokemon. Futhermore, keeping this will make it harder to delete the next time somebody tries, we don't want it to become immortal like the crap template. --S'r Mnbvcxz 02:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC) As of right now the Delete have Majority Vote, but I have a feeling that it will be restored as an In Joke as it appears that Spang is watching over it. Besides the fact that this is a well used template. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 05:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Fraternity

Keep
Delete	Delete. Contains equal parts random and suck. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:43, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Delete --Mnb'z 23:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Delete Anything which Modus noms for VFD I refuse to read on principle. MrN 04:06, Feb 8 Delete. It is a pile of shit. If only I could so easily delete the literal piles of shit around here. pillow talk 04:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Fucking Retarded Ass Touchers. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 04:14, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Fail

Keep
Delete	Strong Delete another one of those insulting wannabe rewrite templates. We do not need this type of thing; we have real {{fix}} and {{rewrite}} templates. --Mnb'z 22:00, 7 February 2009 (UTC) ERADICATE ALL FAILURES! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:09, 7 February 2009 (UTC) I've always hated this one. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 22:22, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Delete Template is Bad, But the image is good. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 02:07, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. It's been subst on user pages, and removed from the mainspace. 9001(bot)  02:27, Feb 8 Delete. but chuckle at the image first, as per everyone else. pillow talk 04:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	I love the image though. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Iraqistan

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Lousy country article. Little progress since 2006.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:01, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. --Mnb'z 16:10, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. A few slightly better versions in the history, but I don't see it improving. MrN 23:14, Feb 6 Destroy Iraqistan! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Huff Now Bad Bad Bad Bad —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 06:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments