For: 24
|
- Self Nom & For [[Talk:HowTo:Get out of Jail|Not only it did excellent on Pee Review]], but with minor tweaks made by THE, this would make a great highlight --Sir Manforman
 21:57, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- LEMME OUT! M4M does terrible things to me at night. Le Cejak • <-> 22:32, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- For... Stupid Incarcerated Carcinogens – Preceding unsigned comment added by CF KFC (talk • contribs)
- Big for --EMC [TALK] 23:00, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- For --THE 23:16, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- For Helpful for when I get incarcerated next week. -- Kippy the Elf
 Talk Works ☃ 03:47, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- kk
 Weasel 3689  04:39, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- For--Dr. Fenwick 05:30, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- For. Short but sweet. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:02, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- For --Moneke 11:38, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- for. this i could have used when i served my dime up at chino... --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:50, 16 October 2007
- For This could be useful, but if not its still funny like hell. Elassint (UTC)
- For --YeOldeLuke 23:38, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- For
 Evil_One275 | Talk | Contribs
- For • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:38, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- For --General Insineratehymn 01:45, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- For Great Article, I loved the part on Fine Print. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [citation needed] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 23:35, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- For. Yeah, go on then. RabbiTechno 17:13, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
For. Manforman whored it on my talk page, but I honestly think it's good. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:55, 18 October 2007 (UTC)- For --AAA! (AAAA) 23:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- For EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 11:05, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- For -Pretty funny dude.--Gaberou 17:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- For — Shadyman
  (Talk • Contribs) 02:06, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- For Rockin' Muthafuckin' Roby-- Made me laugh. 1910 Hours, Michiganistan Time, 20 October 2007.
- For I found it rather useful. Really changed my life, this article. --Vana 23:30, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 23:56, October 22, 2007For Even though you forgot to mention that dancing to "Thriller" also gets you out of jail. --CUN RA Talk to me _00:04, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Against: 15
|
- --L09:01, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Good intro, not enough middle and too much end. Like me, less the Wild Turkey. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:32, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- Against — I see no special quality. SmackBot 14:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Against Which bit of this is funny? I'm lost. The Oblong Lobster 22:03, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Against Not as good as I thought it would be. --Dossier 20:28, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Neh. --
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  20:30, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Against Think I must have missed something here, didn't find it at all in the least funny. --Back Door 23:42, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Against I'm sorry, but I just don't find this funny enough. Pentium5dot1 18:49, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry lacking the FA spark. Great effort though Manforman. --THINKER 23:09, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- Found my principles I now realize that I shouldn't sell myself like that. I take back my for vote and change to against. Even if it means losing ManforMan's vote on my article. As for my reason for the against vote, I read it and thought, "Where's the rest of it?" It feels unfinished and unpolished. --CUN RA Talk to me _ 01:26, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- No As funny as me not being able to get 11 to come up Mulehunter 19:32, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Against - This seems somewhat short. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 20:51, October 27, 2007
- Not quite.---Asteroid B612
 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 01:45, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- Against -RAHB 00:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Manforman whored it on my talk page. That alone should have made me vote against in the first place. I still think it's good, but it's pretty short. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 01:41, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- I'm also offended that I'm about the only user on Uncyclopedia who wasn't begged to vote for this article by Manforman. The Oblong Lobster 22:25, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
One day, when the name Radioactive afikomen is known far and wide, I will not stoop to trading votes with Manforman like its some sort of thrift store. I imagine this is how novice politicians feel after selling out to lobbyists for the first time. --CUN RA Talk to me _00:04, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- The only reason this article has got so many its votes is because of the desperate vote begging and dealing from manforman. This whole nomination stinks.The Oblong Lobster 20:09, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- I can use my sockpuppets to sink the nomination if you want. --CUN RA Talk to me _ 22:51, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Using sockpuppets is a bannable offense - don't do it - ever--Sir Manforman 22:56, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Especially if it's your nomination, right? CUN RA Talk to me _
- Besides, sockpuppets float. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:04, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Floating sockpuppets is a bannable offense - don't do it - ever. Not ever ever ever ever. Not ever. Don't do it.....ever.The Oblong Lobster 23:09, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Aside from my real estate, I only have one sockpuppet. And I don't vote with him—I only use him when I want to say or do something controversial without affecting my own reputation. (I'll give you a hint: he appears on VFH—check "All Nominations" mode—, but he didn't actually vote.) --CUN RA Talk to me _ 01:43, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- What's a sock puppet? And which way should I vote? Manofman 06:15, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm, I can't help you there. The Bardiephraser
 06:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- /me massages temples: If only M4M didn't act like such a douche, he could get somewhere. -- Le Cejak • <-> 16:40, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- Also, on replying to some of your comments Matt lobster, while I did do some vote whoring, a number of the whored users left messages on my talk page saying it was a funny article, It's not nearly as bad as you think--Sir Manforman 21:45, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- Whoring a little on IRC is fairly harmless, after all, it's just casually pointing out an article for someone's consideration. But going to 20 different users' talk pages and asking them all to vote for your article is over the top, a little unethical, and, as shown by komments above, it really gets on people's nerves. Perhaps, in future, a little less talk page whoring would be in order, m4m? --THE 23:49, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't know there was much of a difference between talk page and IRC whoring (I'm rarely on IRC and never saw vote whoring for myself), and I saw user such as Ljlego and The UnIdiot successfully get there articles featured, (even if they weren't great), so I thought I'd give whoring a try and see if it helped me. I'll cut down on the talk page vote whoring, and if I hurted anyone, it wasn't intentioal, I was just trying to get another of my articles featured--Sir Manforman 00:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Not many seem to have a problem with them because, quite frankly, they already have established reputations. Well, Ljlego has that. Hodgepodge got featured because it was tagging along at the end of a Eight-Features-In-A-Single-Week streak he had going on, and UnIdiot gets his whores to work because he has roughly 15,000 friends in the Massachussetts area that want to vote for him. You... you made everyone hate each other last month. Also, you said "hurted". Also also, I didn't find the article too funny. The line about collecting $200 is funny, and that's about it.
- All in all, I'm against talk page whoring. Some people get away with it for the above reasons. If you're going to whore, come on IRC so we can just ignore you. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- It's been brought to my attention that Ljlego doesn't even Talk Page Whore. Provide solid evidence or GTFO. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:28, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- I meant IRC whoring--Sir Manforman 00:40, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- I find talk page whoring kinda annoying. At least I only whore on IRC. And I only have 3 friends on here, and I actually usually don't whore to them. Well maybe theledballoon, but no one else. Well there was that time....well... - UnIdiot |
 | Talk | Contribs - 00:51, Oct 25
- Abstain Tampa 14:27, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- It seems that my comment on Radioactive Afikomen's entry (against number 10) messed up Mulehunter's subsequent entry, so I've moved the comment here. My apologies to Mulehunter. SmackBot 19:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- A very sensible decision. If it's to have an impact on the world as an effective vehicle for satirical humour then Uncyclopedia needs to grow up. SmackBot 06:38, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- I think I may have vote-whored on people's talk pages. How come nobody said anything about that? -- Le Cejak • <-> 00:05, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- Because you probably didn't do it 20 times..... - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 19:29, Oct 31
- Changing my vote to Abstain. I re read it and didn't find it all that humorous. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 19:29, Oct 31
- Not as far as I'm concerned. I found no special quality, humour being one of them. If you read the voters' comments then I think you'll see that lack of humour is your main disadvantage. SmackBot 17:43, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well, some articles only work as stubs. With HowTo:Get out of Jail, due to the nature of its subject, you had so much potential material to work with, yet much of it was left unrealized. I think many readers pick up on that, and say it's "too short". --CUN RA Talk to me _ 18:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Since it's not going to be featured, I might as well play around with it, and expand, get it pee'd, and I'll VFH it when it has expanded--Sir Manforman 18:46, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
|
21:57, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
TKFU
U