From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Hodgepodge
|
Score: 17 absolute truths
|
| Nominated by:
|
Sir Starnestommy  (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 00:51, August 20, 2007
|
For: 23
|
- Nom and For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 00:51, August 20, 2007
- For P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
 (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:52, Aug 20, 2007
- Self-For-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:52, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:25, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Subliminal Advertising Because you send me money now. -- \o/
- For --Señor DiZtheGreat
 CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 01:48, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
    
- For Though I admit that the use of Hubbard and Dubya in the same article made me cringe. -RAHB 03:47, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Dig --THINKER 05:48, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- FORE -
 Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate  15:32, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yes! It made my brain hurt as it drifted, to and fro, aft and about, turning in the very tempest tossed nurons that form my thinking machine. Dame
 GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 14:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- For --General Insineratehymn 22:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- ~
 Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 29/08/2007 @ 23:26
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 00:40, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch
 00:54, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- For -- Roro
  (talk) (Contribs) 14:58, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For. Weird, yet great. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- For I suppose. Can't understand one single strand of thought though. The article is thouroughly drunk. Or I am. Whatever. -- di Mario 21:29, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- for Yes?--Oh Nut.
 15:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- For. Even though this made a huge whoosh as it flew by my head, the prose was good enough for me to get the jokes. Another goody from LJ. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:55, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 02:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- I hereby exercise my democratic right to vote Yes. The article was a bit strange, but good I think. -- Village Idiot♠KUN Free Speech 22:20, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- Have your stupid vote for a humorous article --- UnIdiot |
 | Talk | Contribs - 02:36, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Against: 6
|
- I don't get it. --So So 02:37, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Against as per the "Every article Ljlego wrote can't be that good" rule. Also, this just isn't that good. --
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  02:39, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Against. As per So So. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- I've seen better EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 14:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- And I've seen fire and I've seen rain... Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 14:47, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- You should try headbanging to that song. Or any calm song, really. I've managed it with Vivaldi, it's a good way to pass the time. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 18:15, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Eh. I can't believe I'm voting against a Ljlego article, but it just wasn't that funny. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 22:49 Aug 23, 2007
- Against Sorry LJ Lo. -- Kip the Egg
 Talk Works 22:33, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
(Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 00:51, August 20, 2007
