Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive218

Mr. Sulu

Score: -5
Keep (6)	Keep. Could be the start of something good. Sections 2 and beyond (bitch-slap lists of one-liners about which character is better than which other) must go. Article's biggest defect is that it is not a complete bio, and what humor it does have plays off a specific scene in a specific movie. You really did "have to be there." Though it develops the theme of a Kirk-vs-Sulu death wish, never relates it to the real-life feud between their portrayers that had Shatner not invited to Takei's gay wedding. Spıke ¬ 18:17 20-Oct-10 Keep. Spike, fix it, then. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101021 - 18:02 (UTC) Thank you for your mandate. Here goes. Photon torpedoes, aim at the middle of those lists. Spıke ¬ 18:04 21-Oct-10 *claps* Well done. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101021 - 20:37 (UTC) Keep Sulu has been fixed. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:52, October 21, 2010 (UTC) I concur. --High Gen. Meganew (Stuff I've Done) (Chat With Me) (Get an Award!) FORCES ENLIST MUN 20:36, October 21, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Per the added spikiness. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:15, 21 October 2010 Keep. improved --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:59, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete - Crappy, mostly listcruft. I expect all Star Trek articles to be high quality. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 17:27, Oct. 20, 2010 # Delete. Just no. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:29, October 20, 2010 (UTC) #Delete One of the worst articles ever to be on Uncylcopedia. I still can't quite believe it. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:30, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Kept--ChiefjusticePSX 15:36, October 22, 2010 (UTC)

Captain Complicate

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. It's not very good. pillow talk 09:17, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Concept fails: Complicated writing is bad writing, and why invite it? But concept was not followed. Intro reads like an ad for patent medicine, and the rest of the article is the usual ramblings about the nonexistent character you've just created. Includes someone's favorite Halloween photo of themselves. Spıke ¬ 09:25 20-Oct-10 Delete. Kitty litter. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:56, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It could have been properly complicated, but isn't. Hmph. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101021 - 17:12 (UTC)
Comments

Captain Fishcake

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Keep It's just about good enough. There's somewhat of something here. Some amusing imagery. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:33, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Delete. The author seems to have forgotten to be funny. Never rises above the level of "somewhat zany." pillow talk 09:31, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. No funny. Bio of the made-up character covers his selection of a profession (under the eight-year-old concept: showing an affinity for it such that his parents buy him a boat). Author gets up to the time of his marriage. Then quits. Spıke ¬ 09:56 20-Oct-10  Batman. Not bad writing, just nothing humorous about it. Maybe if it had just a little dose of reality it might be a keep, but there's nothing here that even made me smile. --—John Lydon 15:11, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete.Can't see what you can do with this. Throw it back into the sea. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:26, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Not really up to the standard of crap of these others, but I don't really see it going anywhere, either. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101021 - 17:57 (UTC)
Comments	If Hyperbole pursues this project through Captain Zymurgy, we are going to set an all-time record for consecutive slam-dunk Delete votes. Someone find something saveable! Spıke ¬ 09:58 20-Oct-10

Captain Birdseye

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. What's that neologism I hear around here from time to time? Ah, yes. Randumbo. pillow talk 09:27, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Specialty is Nonsense Dates. The illustrations suck. The writing sucks. Spıke ¬ 09:50 20-Oct-10 Captain Cruft -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 17:43, Oct. 20, 2010 Delete. Wot? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101021 - 17:38 (UTC)
Comments

Captain Attourney

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Arguably some of the worst prose I've seen on Uncyclopedia. Quickly changes the subject to casual racism for no apparent reason. pillow talk 09:26, October 20, 2010 (UTC) most people dont know him "Attourney" is not the correct American spelling; could be the British, Wikipedia has a redirect, but most of what Google coughs up seems to be misspellings from the US. Is there a possible humor concept in mapping this hated profession to a superhero? It could be casual racism, but dwelling on Simpson/Cochrane made me think this article was written by homies, who are allowed to call each other niggers--also to turn in awful papers, which you must not mark down, because it means you hate them all on the most superficial of grounds. Spıke ¬ 09:48 20-Oct-10 Delete. Just someone who can't spell attorney correctly. Not a British spelling. With that out of the way, this is bilge with added thick headed stupidity. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:49, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Ah, randomness and misspellings. How nice. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101021 - 17:25 (UTC)
Comments

Captain Pugwash

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Possibly the worst "Captain" article yet. pillow talk 09:22, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. An author who surely has been graded all year on the basis of sentence length, Spıke ¬ 09:28 20-Oct-10 Delete. Well, it's just crap. And not worthy of a series that loads of kids enjoyed. Myocardialinfarction 00:06, October 21, 2010 (UTC) Kill. It'd need a proofreading if the content was redeemable... but just removing it would be more effective, methinks. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101021 - 17:24 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Captain Pugwash of blessed memory - a cheap kid's cartoon which used cut outs to move in front of the camera. Actually it does have topicality to it..don't know. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:52, October 20, 2010 (UTC)

Captain Omnipotent

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. A superhero who also happens to be God. There is not a shred of humor in this. pillow talk 09:21, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Nine quotes is an article already taken with itself. Am trying to figure out whether mapping Jehovah Elohim a-k-a God a-k-a Allah to a Marvel Comics character is a winning concept; but no matter, author does nothing with it, but proceeds directly to listing strengths (duh! he's omnipotent!) and weaknesses, then finally trots out the craptastic. Spıke ¬ 09:34 20-Oct-10 STFU --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:46, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Weak. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101021 - 17:19 (UTC) Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:05, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Eye color

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Random, stupid and repetitive... and not even funny past the small nonsense. Moo. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101020 - 18:08 (UTC) Delete. Reads as though it were sporked from Wikipedia or some other text, then slightly garbled by the addition of jokes, mostly about SEX, pee, and poop. But entire stretches are not funny at all. There were two sections about blue eyes, and one more with "blue eyes" in the heading, when Killer 3.14 created the article last December. He never finished making it funny, and it's been I.P. Anon ever since. Spıke ¬ 18:24 20-Oct-10  Batman. I was thinking exactly what Spike said when I read this. Reads like a plagarised article that has a few words changed here and there for (failed) humor effect. -- ~ *You can be Robin* (talk) 18:28, October 20, 2010 (UTC) [1] --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 18:56, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Thieves. I despise sporks that don't have the spork tag. This spork didn't even try. Aleister 9:47 21 10 Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:04, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Captain Vague

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Spends a paragraph confusing uncommunicativeness for vagueness, and then descends into quotecruft. Whee. pillow talk 09:24, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Like Captain Complicate, we ought not have an article whose name encourages bad writing, including three-line-long section heads for the sake of continuing to hammer home the single joke. Spıke ¬ 09:40 20-Oct-10 Delete. It's ... well...BUTTPOOP! --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:21, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Keel haul! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:51, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Captain Denial

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Delete. If anyone would like to read a page that's a rambling story with no clear point that the author is clearly making up as he goes along, now's your chance!! pillow talk 09:29, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Can't deny that. Intro tries to get us to read two other articles instead (only one's a red-link). "Time passed. More time passed. It still passes. Read something while time passes. All time passed. And when this much time passed, nothing interesting happened." (Triple-spacing omitted.) You get the picture. Spıke ¬ 09:53 20-Oct-10  Batman. I made it to the beginning of the second section before my brain jumped out of my skull and started protesting the unfair work conditions. --—John Lydon 15:14, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:00, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Crapsticks. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:31, October 20, 2010 (UTC) -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 17:40, Oct. 20, 2010 Delete Laugh free, just one calorie. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:44, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Amaroo School

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Batman Nothing funny or salvagable. Just a rather long vanity piece about some school that no ones ever heard of and its principal sucking. --—John Lydon 13:43, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Robin "Some of the teachers are nice and kind but others are downright annoying." Doesn't that, from the intro, make you want to read on? Let's tell 'em Uncyclopedia is not the place to berate your teachers or principal by name, no matter what the perceived injustices. Spıke ¬ 14:13 20-Oct-10 Delete. Grudge article about a place no has heard of. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:24, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. We all care! Disclaimer: No we don't. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:26, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete - The first sentence made me laugh. After that, it all went to hell. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 17:36, Oct. 20, 2010 Delete Vanity + borderline cyber-bulling. Can you cyber-bully a teacher? mAttlobster. (hello) 17:42, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Per above. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101020 - 18:31 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Utter mediocrity. So generic and mediocre it should be converted into a template where a student can fill in a variable for their location and one for the school name and have it generate itself. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:17, October 20, 2010 (UTC) I've often thought we should do option tags with these school VFD's.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  21 Oct 2010 ~ 02:24 (UTC)

Madonna

Score: -1
Keep (5)	Keep. Remove the lists, and actually do a rewrite. Till then too big a topic, we'll alienate our gay writers here.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:24, October 16, 2010 (UTC) Keep.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  19 Oct 2010 ~ 03:03 (UTC) Keep. I reverted to an older revision and removed a couple lists. While the article may still be not that good, I think it's good enough to be kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:49, 16 October 2010 Keep. Three old-timey uncyians want it kept, so who am I to argue (or to get out of a rewrite). Someone can dig into this page with a backhoe and do well with it. Madonna deserves far less. Aleister 00:37 20 10 Keep. notability reasons. For a topic that notable, a blank page is worse than utter crap. --Mn-z 01:23, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Delete. Totally random nonsense that seems to spiral into further nonsense. No reedeming value at all. --—John Lydon 14:45, October 15, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Dittoes. I'm off the fence on Aleister's promise of a rewrite--which will be better. Spıke ¬ 10:17 16-Oct-10 PS--Older revision is still awful. "Jesus attempted to kill her, believing that she was true antichrist....Madonna is able to sing simultaneously via her vagina, anus, and mouth...." The only real theme is that Madonna is a slut. (And the joke is...?) Aleister's rewrite will be better. Whenever. Spıke ¬ 10:47 17-Oct-10 Kill it. Better will come. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101016 - 14:22 (UTC) Screw it; I want no part in this. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101016 - 20:05 (UTC) Delete. Since this is trending that way. Can I place a huge moving ad for Gorilla Glue along the top of a rewrite? Aleister 17:29 16 10 Delete.It is poorly written, makes no sense, and is in no way funny. And I may be slightly n00bish on Uncyclopedia(proven by my misplacement of this vote the first time around), but I'm pretty sure the whole point of the site is to be funny. KMudd 00:25 10 16 Delete It isn't in any way funny. Promised rewrite will sort out this misery sponge. mAttlobster. (hello) 10:36, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	I dunno. If it fails I'll do a rewrite on my user space, too much to do right now. The page is a good template for an article, I'd reckon. Aleister 20:53 15 10 Kept --ChiefjusticePSX 08:18, October 21, 2010 (UTC)

Pole'd

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Yay, an epic hero! ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101020 - 00:28 (UTC) Delete. Article, written over four days in March, 2006, describes an imaginary spinoff of an imaginary movie, with the sole purpose of hitting people with poles and then gleefully declaring, "You got pole'd!" In short, an article written to try to create a meme. (If this meme already existed, it doesn't make the article funny.) Spıke ¬ 01:25 20-Oct-10 Delete. Smokes the pole. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:05, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. This article reminds me that what we do here is for the good of all people. Excrete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:42, October 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Although it it better than I thought. And I thought it was going to be about people getting raped with poles. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:18, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Captain Archer

Score: 6
Keep (1)	Keep. A few amusing parts.--Sycamore (Talk) 20:08, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (7)	Delete. Although I wish we had an article on Captain Archer, this is not as good as a blank page. pillow talk 18:58, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. The comedy "concept" is a strained pun on his name, followed by a bio assembled from memes from the Star Trek universe. Not even a Trekkie would enjoy this article, although he might feel right at home. Spıke ¬ 19:36 18-Oct-10 Delete. Set phasers to huff. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:25, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Another waste of electons. No one is going to read this except us and this stuff is just a tripe template. Literary droppings! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:32, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete I've written a book about how bad this article is. It's available on Amazon and currently has a sales rank of 904,221, which to be honest with you (the second-person), I am disappointed with. It even includes some pictures of me riding my mountain bike through the New Forrest - and whilst my publisher initially claimed they were irrelevent, he was won around when I demonstrated how effectively they broke up the bleak soul destroying commentary on this article. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:46, October 19, 2010 (UTC) Disintegrate. Once again, no VFD tag, so vote restart. But this still sucks. Saberwolf116 13:43, October 19, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It's... bad. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101020 - 03:06 (UTC)
Comments	Wow. Just wow.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  19 Oct 2010 ~ 01:59 (UTC)

Akon

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Delete. What? To many dead links,bad images... ----Mimo 13:34, October 19, 2010 (UTC)/ I know i forgot it Look back and watch me huff that... Also, you forgot the VFD tag, so this must be restarted. Saberwolf116 13:38, October 19, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Lazy, listy, nasty musiciancruft. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:58, October 19, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Bad text, too. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101019 - 20:59 (UTC) Delete. Another tragically missed opportunity. Wikipedia says that Akon is a legitimate cover voice, but discloses several attributes, such as a twelve-word birth name, that are eminently ready for ridicule. Author Dillonmufc started this article in 2008 and then went away forever, so no hope for improvement via {{ICU}}; Anons have been "working" on it ever since, not getting it above the trite level of lists of Allies and Enemies. Spıke ¬ 21:09 19-Oct-10 Delete. Another sorry entry in the abuse+unfunny+racism category which guarantees 100% crap.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:29, October 19, 2010 (UTC) Smack that! -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 17:30, Oct. 20, 2010
Comments	There will never be a better Akon article. Just let that sink in for a moment will you.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  20 Oct 2010 ~ 00:45 (UTC)

Captain Courageous

Score: 4
Keep (2)	A very very very very very weak keep As much as I hate to say it, I actually laughed once or twice. And I think with some rewriting, it could be a good article. -- 01:28, October 19, 2010 (UTC) Keep. It has potential and a few lol's.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  19 Oct 2010 ~ 01:53 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Delete. This could be generously characterized as "a nice try." pillow talk 19:06, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 20:05, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Kipling wrote Captains Courageous, about a spoiled brat rescued by fishermen and forced to do honest work. Plenty of possibilities for satire; morph him into a superhero if you must. All author wants to do here is invent yet another character for yet another video game with a sham bio, a defecation joke, and a list of opponents. Spıke ¬ 21:09 18-Oct-10 Delete. Junior uncyclopedia. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:23, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Not very good in this incarnation. Myocardialinfarction 23:50, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete This is lazy. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:06, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Captain Cook

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Not about Cook; probably better named "Captain Fourteen Year Old Kid Amusing Himself By Saying Random Stuff." pillow talk 19:05, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 20:07, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Not about Cook. Not about anything. Almost about Thomas Cook Ltd. Spıke ¬ 21:12 18-Oct-10 Delete. Start random, red links, special powers and enemies. Captain Anybody. Crap in all languages and formats.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:25, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I'm just going to masturbate. I may be some time. Myocardialinfarction 23:52, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. "Captain Cook's arch-enemies include: Hawaiians ha!  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  19 Oct 2010 ~ 01:55 (UTC)
Comments

Captain Charisma

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. It's difficult to describe this page, but the word "abortion" comes to mind. pillow talk 19:04, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. 2006cruft is also a good word. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:04, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Hyperbole is expressing his deeply repressed desire that he wishes his Mother had finished the job with the coat hanger on that summer day 40 years ago;)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:07, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Let's charitably assume that there is a character in professional wrestling called Captain Charisma, and that the memes in this story are drawn from that wrestling circuit and could be amusing to a wrestling fan. Even so, there are places in Hell reserved for articles that regard as a punch line, "Charisma then fucked Kurt Angle with a chair." By the way, psychologists often conclude that someone "had no affect [sic] from any drugs." Spıke ¬ 20:47 18-Oct-10 Delete. Junk.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:27, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Edited in 2008 (changed an illustration; took him five tries) by User:CaptainCharisma during his single day of life on Uncyclopedia. Spıke ¬ 20:51 18-Oct-10

Captain Awesome

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Pointless and unfunny attempt to get in on the "Captain" meme. pillow talk 19:01, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. "He resides in the city of AAAAAAAAA." You can see where this article is going: Nowhere. Spıke ¬ 19:39 18-Oct-10 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 20:08, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Are all these written by the same class of crap jockeys? Kiddie scribbles.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:29, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Smite. Fail --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 00:40, October 19, 2010 (UTC) Delete.It slights Chuck.----Mimo 11:53, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Hype is barely through the A's--having touched no article notable enough to be included in {{Captains}}. Spıke ¬ 19:39 18-Oct-10 I reside in the city of AAAAAAAAA. And I'm pretty awesome. But I am no captain.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  19 Oct 2010 ~ 01:56 (UTC)

Captain Anonymous

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Pretty fucking bad. pillow talk 18:57, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. The humor is all by typography (animated GIF and strike-over), because the substance is the usual creation of a fantasy character and then ranting to the reader about him. Spıke ¬ 19:02 18-Oct-10 Delete.Belongs on ED. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:46, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 20:09, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Close the lid and pull the chain.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:36, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Obliterate. Bigger Fail --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 10:30, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

DOGS

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Delete. On the way to destruction. Has no chance to survive make your time. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:51, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. For starters, DOGS seems to be a take-off on CATS, a very listy article that gives a nod to the Broadway musical but seems to be mostly about the meme-filled video game--and most of its lists are recombinations of the memes that someone else made funny (by being Japanese and trying to speak English). But excuse me, we were talking about DOGS. Seven sections. Seven paragraphs. In view of the above, I can't tell if anything relates to anything. Spıke ¬ 18:56 18-Oct-10 Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 19:02, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 20:16, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Derp derp derp derp derp derp derp... banana phone! pillow talk 21:16, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Pooper scoop this muck away.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:39, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Why is that even an article? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101019 - 01:38 (UTC)
Comments

Pots

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Fail execution --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 00:48, October 19, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Goofy and listy; if you needed a hyperlink in your article, you would code Pot. Spıke ¬ 00:52 19-Oct-10 Delete. Somehow that was way worse than I expected. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:52, October 19, 2010 (UTC) Er... yeah. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101019 - 20:54 (UTC) Delete. Shit pot and that was the mildest I could come up with.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:32, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Anthony Callea

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. He's gay, I guess. That's the joke. Was there a joke? At all? --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:31, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. He is gay, according to a Wikipedia article that is long and listy in its own right. There is no humor in the first paragraph, and nothing untrue, probably including, "this entry was probably written by a ten-year-old." It's followed by the assertion that 100% of the sales of a hit record were refunded or discarded; a play on his homosexuality; and then--The End. Even his Australian fans will wonder why we couldn't write any real humor on him. Spıke ¬ 20:57 18-Oct-10 Delete. Not a Lot About Very Much At All.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:16, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. There are a couple alternate versions in the history, but none worth keeping. pillow talk 21:52, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. What joke? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101020 - 03:08 (UTC)
Comments

Captain Exaggeration

Score: 8
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (8)	Delete. Could have been a funny one; degenerates into insane randomness instead. pillow talk 19:09, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 20:05, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Exaggeration=/=randumbo. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:36, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Quite, Count; the first quote suggests that author thinks exaggeration means repetition. The rest of the article, from Nixon and Checkers to Hilary [sic] Clinton on a throne, shows that author doesn't care what it means. A wasted opportunity for a fictional bio that could have been Uncyclopedia's funniest, most brilliant, and best-written article ever!!! Spıke ¬ 21:01 18-Oct-10 Sorry; not even a wasted opportunity. Exaggeration tells that joke just fine. Spıke ¬ 12:10 19-Oct-10 Delete. Painful,just painful. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:20, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Yup, that's horseshit. Myocardialinfarction 23:47, October 18, 2010 (UTC) LIES!!!!!!!!! --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 00:43, October 19, 2010 (UTC) Delete. For really obvious reasons... wait, that's not even an exaggeration here, is it? Damn. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101020 - 03:10 (UTC)
Comments

George Dubya Bush

Score: -1
Keep (4)	Keep. Am I the only one who finds this article just a tad bit funny? I mean, I got a few laughs out of it. --TheSlyFox 08:53, October 15, 2010 (UTC) This is a piece of Uncyclopedia history. As such, I reverted it to an older revision. Also, while there's probably a lot of crap in there still, and it's probably outdated as hell, there's also a lot of stuff that's pretty funny. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:44, 16 October 2010 Keep. Socky did the older revert, which maybe helps it. Hopefully someone works on the page, not me though, I can't stand thinking about or looking at this creep. Had enough of him, until his state funeral, for which I'll make the popcorn. Aleister 17:48 16 10 Keep. A decent page, if a rewrite were applied to it. --High Gen. Meganew (Stuff I've Done) (Chat With Me) (Get an Award!) FORCES ENLIST MUN 19:59, October 16, 2010 (UTC) weak keep I think some people still find Bush-bashing funny. I would recommend that this page be moved to a sub-page of George W. Bush, along with the 2005 legacycruft version. --Mn-z 16:27, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. 53 kB of nothing but Bush-bashing. What is this, 2004? The article could be saved, but that would take more time than VFDing it and starting over. Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 01:54 Friday, October 15, 2010 Never Mind, I was just looking at the pictures. Some of the pictures are quite funny, so I vote to remove them from the general vicinity then disintegrate the rest of it. --TheSlyFox 08:56, October 15, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It's rubbish. And anyhow, the other one's links belie its seemingly positive take. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101015 - 21:00 (UTC) # There can be only one! And this isn't it. --Mn-z 01:30, October 16, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	This is a horrible article and I won't be sad to see it go. It mixes partisan fallacies, 911-truther memes, and semen jokes and never rises to the level of wry or incisive. However, as I understand it, this is the counterpart to the fawning George W. Bush and is our designated escape valve for Democrats. Spıke ¬ 02:09 15-Oct-10 What if the two articles were combined? Because compared to the current article in question, George W. Bush is funnier. Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 02:35 Friday, October 15, 2010 I agree it is funnier, but the humor concept is different--the last time I read it, it was a retrospective on Bush through the forgiving/naive eyes of a Mary Matalin or a Peggy Noonan. None of the crap from this article would fit easily there. I've stated here in the past my own hope of some day writing yet another Bush article, neither pro nor con but a ridiculous, dead-pan list of all his small-government initiatives that left us with bigger government. Spıke ¬ 02:57 15-Oct-10 Then I guess just delete this one and take out anything pointing to George Dubya Bush in George W. Bush and just make it a bit less serious? Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 03:05 Friday, October 15, 2010 I don't think we need a definite article on Bush. Perhaps he can have two but this one isn't any good as it currently stands.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:58, October 15, 2010 (UTC) I agree. Although certain parts are better after Socky's work, it's still not all that good. Thatdamnedfollowspot 03:42 Sunday, October 17, 2010 Kept ~ 19:51, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

Making up Oscar Wilde quotes

Score: -1
Keep (5)	Seems to me it's now the open season on Wilde. It's a piece of Uncyclopedia history, it has some good bits and I see no reason to remove it. There are 10000 other pieces of cruft you could be nomming right now. ~ 12:30, October 17, 2010 (UTC) The quotes themselves should live on, within the articles in which they are used. Regarding the 10000 argument, we are not obliged to vote on articles in strict order of horribleness. Spıke ¬ 13:19 17-Oct-10 Keep - Per Kojak, this is amusing in parts and is also part of Uncyclopedia's infamous history. As I say many times, those without a sense of humour should go to Wikipedia where their tinkering would be more welcome and appropriate.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:57, October 17, 2010 (UTC) Keep. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:18, October 17, 2010 (UTC) Keep. It would be nice to keep Wilde quotes on one page, and this one is of course worth keeping. On the site itself, over time I've removed many Wilde and other quotes from pages, but my criteria is utter stupidness. This particular page maybe shouldn't bear the brunt of our historical overattachment and now beginning-to-look-stupid outselves identification to Norris and Wilde. Aleister 9:51 18 10 Keep I find it funny that it could be funny. mAttlobster. (hello) 10:37, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Delete. This is a pure list of quotes, most of which are random nonsense. I can live with Unquotable:Oscar Wilde, but we don't need two pages about (generally) retarded fake quotes by Oscar Wilde. The page uses quote templates so many times that it is the sole member of the auto-generated category Category:Pages with too many expensive parser function calls. --Mn-z 12:23, October 17, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Voters, please read Forum:Trim back the Oscar Wilde Project?--Our previous vote to delete {{OWQ}} ran up against this rat's nest of templates and I sought wider review of either taking direct aim at this institution or reverting that decision. I argue there for the former, that Uncyclopedia cataloguing its invention of Oscar Wilde quotes is Uncyclopedia taking itself too seriously. Spıke ¬ 13:18 17-Oct-10 Delete. I was expecting something about making up Oscar Wilde quotes, not a massive heap of made up Oscar Wilde quotes... moving the quotes to some place for quotes and actually having this about making them up might sway my vote, but I don't see that happening. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101017 - 15:01 (UTC) Delete.Time to bury Oscar Wilde and move on. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:22, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	comment to deleting admin since this might be controversial, you may want to allow it extra time before deleting. --Mn-z 12:23, October 17, 2010 (UTC) Re:Mordillo: If there are good quotes in this, I would have no objection to moving them to Unquotable:Oscar Wilde. Also, regarding the 10,000 pieces of cruft that are worse than this argument: the page is nothing but a list of fictional quotes from the king of tired inside-jokes. I think that safely qualifies as a bad article. --Mn-z 16:22, October 17, 2010 (UTC) Kept--~ 19:53, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

Counter-strike

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Delete.I was thinking I could save this with judicious editing but there's not much worth a damn after the intro section. It just gets progressively worse after the second paragraph. By the time we hit weapons (section 1) we're into unfunny bitching territory. After wading through sections written by people whose main form of communication is spamming "PWN3D!!!!" at each other grumblewhining hits epidemic levels and things look like Encyclopedia Drmamtica at its worst. I figure if over 95% of this is huffworthy I might as well just VFD it. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:19, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Delete. So much badness in... such a long article. Fortunately my brain glazed over part of the way through and saved me some pain... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101014 - 03:42 (UTC) Delete.Another frustrated game writer. Go away and squeeze your spots elsewhere author!--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:54, October 14, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. I apologize in advance to anyone who had to read through the whole thing. If you didn't, trust me on how badly it degrades after the intro section. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:19, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Isn't this the game that famously lets Junior pretend he is a terrorist and spray machine-gun fire at US troops? We need something on it, perhaps (like the article on the Birmingham Niggers) a focus on how the proprietors could have been so politically tone-deaf. But what we get here is the typical gamer-cruft about what amuses Me and all my buddies LULZ!!!!!! Spıke ¬ 18:36 13-Oct-10

Category:People Who Hit the Wall

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. nonsense/people-I-don't-like category. --Mn-z 01:36, October 16, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I agree. "Hit the wall?" Jenna Jameson? There could be a Category:People who jumped the shark--that is, achieved their Fifteen Minutes of Fame and are now demonstrably on the other side of it. Spıke ¬ 02:54 16-Oct-10 Why not rename it? Anyhoo, I don't like the name. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101016 - 14:21 (UTC) Delete. One for the museum.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:25, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Category:Epic Failures

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Following the "pick one" box below, here is a legitimate nomination for exactly one. Happytimes disagrees, but I think this category is redundant with Category:Epic Fail, to which I'd copy all its contents. Spıke ¬ 13:18 15-Oct-10 Delete. SPIKE. The SPIKEster. The SPIKEinator. SPIKEmeister. Aleister 20:47 15 10 Also, Spikopotamus. Spıke ¬ 10:24 16-Oct-10 Delete. I don't actually care which goes, but this one is the one that was put up. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101015 - 21:01 (UTC) Delete. per above. --Mn-z 01:33, October 16, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	The discussion on the previous incarnation of this nomination may be viewed here. --ChiefjusticePSX 16:51, October 15, 2010 (UTC) Note to deleting admin when deleting this category, please move all its contents to category:Epic Fail (pruning cruft if you feel like), or leave it alone and let Spike move it, rather than de-catting everything in this category. --Mn-z 01:33, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Anti-Neo-Soviet Order of Oranges

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. That's real fucking great, sir. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 23:26, October 14, 2010 (UTC) Ugh! The cutesy, overcomplicated title sets the stage. Normally, I would never type this nor click on a link to it, but here goes; we get inside and three templates coach my interpretation of the mirth that is surely to follow. Then a clueless illustration and two quotes, each with gratuitous obscenity that doesn't help anything. Still with me? here's the payload: It's a federation of essentially fictitious countries, with a cutesy acronym and an opposition organization. The rest of the article describes its history and the positions it has taken. Unfortunately, we are sure by now that we do not care. Spıke ¬ 01:51 15-Oct-10 Delete. an eye double glazer. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:14, October 15, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 08:22, October 15, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Huurr. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101015 - 21:02 (UTC)
Comments

:Category:Things That Are In My Garage

Score: 0
Keep (3)	Keep. I like it... although this garage could use a little purging. Which I may or may not be bothered to do. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101012 - 23:59 (UTC) Keep. Yeah, a little purging but many of the items make sense. I'll add my Garage Sale page, which would directly fit. And, of course, Lyrithya wants it saved, and I do her bidding as well as do anything I do on this site just to make her happy. She's demanding though, and that worries me, as I, a sockpuppet, fear for my own main user who has to run quite a few of us now. Aleister 2:03 13 10 Er... Aleister, see me in my office after class. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101013 - 02:12 (UTC) Keep. (I keep this category in my garage, ironic huh?)  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  14 Oct 2010 ~ 05:18 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. category that does not categorize. I believe at one time, there was a useless sectional template that went with this equally useless category. --Mn-z 23:35, October 12, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Category that does not categorize. Spıke ¬ 02:05 13-Oct-10 Delete. Death to nostalgia. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:52, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I guess this could categorize if you totally rearranged it, but it would be a fairly pointless. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:39, October 13, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. I'm trying to rearrange it a little so it makes some sense. Getting rid of the Things template above would help out a lot. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:56, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Kept. ~ 15:57, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

:Category:People With Huge Dicks

Score: -3
Keep (6)	Keep. Useful in the case of Ron Jeremy. As in the case of Debbie Does Dallas, depending on what you mean by "with." Prune the cases where someone is using a Category to merely crack wise in fine print on someone else's page. Spıke ¬ 22:47 11-Oct-10 moderately weak keep while not my favorite category, and prone to being a wise-cracking category, it does convey information since Well-endowed can mean a person has either an above average sized penis or breasts. Basically, my theory is that only categories that don't actually categorize (beyond being a list of people the editor doesn't like) should be deleted. Of course, if this does get deleted, I really won't care. --Mn-z 23:49, October 11, 2010 (UTC) Keep. How will we ever know which users are guys if we don't have this category?  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  12 Oct 2010 ~ 05:13 (UTC) Keep. Though I ain't sure why. Although it may have something to do with the fact that I seem to agree with Mnbvcxz for once. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101013 - 00:11 (UTC) very useful category --Roman Dog Bird 01:36, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Keep. How else will other Uncyclopedia users let us know how huge their dick is? --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:19, October 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. Why would we care about something this trivial? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 22:08, October 11, 2010 (UTC) A couple of us would. But (in general)--how would we know?! Spıke ¬ 22:49 11-Oct-10 Circumcise There is another category, "Well endowded" which covers this just nicely, and for those who don't refer to animals as people, then it covers all species as well. I guess just make sure all the people in one are in the other as well. Aleister 23:27 11 10 Delete. I concur with Aleister as he is the one with the tape measure. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:02, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	When nominating a Category, always put a colon before it in the section head. Otherwise, it simply enrolls the VFD page in the Category! "Simply" as in: We can't see what you nominated. Spıke ¬ 22:46 11-Oct-10 Kept. ~ 15:55, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Gaahl

Score: -3
Keep (4)	Keep. It has plenty of content pertaining to black metal and the man in question. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 00:06, October 11, 2010 (UTC) Keep....needs work and details of his interesting take on justice and run ins with the law. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) Keep. It's not good, but it was a pleasant respite after reading some of the other stuff here... so, er... yeah. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101014 - 03:42 (UTC) I wouldn't vote to feature it or anything... --monika 01:55, October 16, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Disintegrate. Apologies for not being on VFD lately; school has kept me busy. Anyways, this article is a very creative story of a fictional gnome, but unfortunately, it's not funny in any way. It also appears to have nothing to do with the black metal singer of the same name. Saberwolf116 19:10, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	I disagree with Saberwolf that it has nothing to do with the black metal singer; not only is the phrase "black metal" sprinkled throughout, but Wikipedia says Gaahl is actually gay, so this article is not merely using the common Uncyclopedia hatchet-job of calling a rock performer gay. Wikipedia goes on to note a dozen more outrageous things about the performer and his stated opinions, though, whereas this very mediocre article dwells on his status as a laboratory life form. Spıke ¬ 20:04 10-Oct-10 Kept. ~ 15:54, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Skin

Score: -2
Keep (3)	Weak keep. If you got rid of the quotes, the lists, and the entire trite section about judging people by their skin color, this could stay. Spıke ¬ 18:35 10-Oct-10 Upgrade to Keep. I've fixed the typoes, deflated the gassy writing, and partially softened the racial generalizations. Spıke ¬ 11:34 16-Oct-10 Keep. It looks savable, and someone might be bothered. I'm not helping, though. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101010 - 18:39 (UTC) Keep. Did an edit sweep although it's far from done, added a bit although it's far from done, and added no pics. There is no VFD tag on it though, so I guess it should go on and the clock should be restarted, which I don't know how to do, the clock part that is. Aleister 00:40 10 10 p.s. VFD tag went up a few minutes after I wrote the above. Can someone who knows how restart the clock from that point? Thanks.
Delete (1)	Nom & delete
Comments	Comment. I did the clock thing. -- 01:01, October 11, 2010 (UTC) Kept. ~ 15:53, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Template:Bear suit

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	The dog says it goes. Spıke ¬ 11:25 14-Oct-10 Delete. Insensitive to furries. Template used on one person's user page. The person in question has only updated their user page and created this template. After that they went inactive for four years. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:01, October 14, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Doesn't do the bear suit justice. And it's useless. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101014 - 03:42 (UTC) Delete. If we want an "I'm a furry fan" template, we should get one that several users will use. --Mn-z 10:54, October 14, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 11:35, October 14, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Dismissed. Litigant isn't human. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:47, October 14, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Roll.EXE

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. I don't think there's a single joke in here that hasn't been used to death on Uncyclopedia. It's a monolith carved from pure cruft in the shape of a giant cliché. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:10, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Apart from writing an article that touches most of the 100 Uncyclopedia official memes, the only charm here comes from the original character and was not added by author. Spıke ¬ 22:28 13-Oct-10 Huh? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101014 - 03:42 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:12, October 14, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:48, October 14, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Ass Crust

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Aaaarghh! My eyes! --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:22, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Delete. "Disgusting at first sight but when looked at more closely it's [sic] beauty suddenly emerges." Not! Stays disgusting. Spıke ¬ 18:25 13-Oct-10 EXTERMINATE! --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 21:48, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Delete. That's... er, lovely. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101014 - 03:42 (UTC) Delete. Another few seconds of life wasted.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:49, October 14, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Old Boot

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Ow! My brain! --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:09, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Delete. "Fight against erectile dysfunction in child pornographers." This, from the intro, sets the stage; nothing here except the joy of typing curses to a worldwide audience. Spıke ¬ 18:27 13-Oct-10 Gets the boot --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 22:03, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Er... not sure what I can add after what's already been said. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101014 - 03:42 (UTC) Delete. Slops. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:51, October 14, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Things

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. While I question the usefulness of category:Things That Are In My Garage this template is utterly pointless and contributes three of the least essential entries to the aforementioned category. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:56, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Delete. A category that does not categorize. Spıke ¬ 18:23 13-Oct-10 Delete. I could have sworn this template was deleted. I may have been thinking of when I purged its red links or something. --Mn-z 21:19, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I like the category, but this is pointless. For that matter, the category itself stands plenty well on its own! ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101013 - 23:42 (UTC) Delete. Good for you! --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:15, October 14, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Useless.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:52, October 14, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Mars Climate Orbiter

Score: -2
Keep (2)	Lotsa keep The page satires the fact that the Mars Climate Orbiter was lost on landing because some tech moron contractor keyed in American numbers instead of metrics for a key computer operation--or the opposite, I'm not sure, or something--and nobody caught it. One of the biggest mistakes in space exploration history. Reads more like an UnNews, but since UnNews wasn't around at the time this probably had to do. Tis the backstory. Lyrithya, I thought we talked about this during our pillow talk last night? Aleister 11:43 14 10 A little keep. Al and I have piled on. Needs one more photo. Spıke ¬ 12:21 14-Oct-10
Delete (0)	Words put together in no particular order... now where have I seen this before? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101014 - 03:42 (UTC) I'm an idiot... but fortunately, we already knew that. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101014 - 12:22 (UTC)
Comments	Lyrithya, this article--mostly unchanged since 2006--is not the most random vomit of words we've seen. But it contains only one joke: Someone used an area code for a postal code. The compelling jokes--the absurdity of measuring climate on Mars (Is it warming? Did we cause it? The UN to the rescue?) are untouched. If the article dies, the apologetic final paragraph is its own epitaph. Spıke ¬ 11:31 14-Oct-10 You're right... it just leads into it so horribly. Or something. Or maybe it was the grammar... ugh, I'll make sense of this when I get my brain back. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101014 - 12:05 (UTC) I may have fixed it. Did you leave your brain somewhere again? Aleister 12:08 14 10 I... I don't like the sentence structure. O_o I got out of bed. Bad idea, apparently. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101014 - 12:22 (UTC) Okay, I just read the title as 'Mail Order Lobster'... perhaps I should leave, now. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101014 - 12:38 (UTC) Mail order lobster. Having biggest laugh of the week. Seriously. Would be a great name for an article. And I'm leaving now too. Were we supposed to meet up? Aleister 1:14 14 10 Nomination withdrawn. Kept. MadMax 03:17, October 15, 2010 (UTC)

Category:The Mormon Plot to Destroy America

Score: 3
Keep (2)	Keep. Mormons shouldn't get away that easy. If we just want one category for Mormons, I'd suggest this name instead of the plain "Mormons". Or keep them both, why not, it doesn't hurt anything and Mormons are also practicing in other countries, so the America specific category is a subcat. (and see my comment below regarding Mitt Romney and the relevance of this category) Aleister 00:25 10 10 We ought not crack wise with the navigation tools, not be so anxious to show off our sense of humor that the reader can't find what he's looking for. Spıke ¬ 00:35 10-Oct-10 Keep. After reading all of the comments I think it's funny enough to stand on it's own merit.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  11 Oct 2010 ~ 05:55 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Delete. its redundant with the less verbosely named Category:Mormons, since all Mormons are trying to destroy America. --Mn-z 00:13, October 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. The contents of this Category are Mormons, for whom you would look, I guess, in Category:Mormons. Unless you believed in the Plot, which even the intro to the category denies it does. Spıke ¬ 00:34 10-Oct-10 Delete. Redundant and overly small and I have a headache, so I want to see it suffer. There should be a category of fake categories. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101010 - 14:19 (UTC) Delete. This is even categorizeable? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:27, October 11, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Good article basis, not a good category basis. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:49, October 11, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Re:Aleister: The reason I like short category names is that is makes categorization easier. If a person is "guessing" at categories, Mormons will show up from auto-fill if a person starts typing [[Category:Mormo..., or if they look in the catbrowser under "M", they will find Category:Mormons easily. --Mn-z 00:32, October 10, 2010 (UTC) Good reasoning. But why not keep both categories? The American one is U.S. specific, and with Mitt Romney as one of the favorites for the next GOP nomination this category seems spot-on. Aleister 00:39 10 10 What Spike said, navigation tools are to find stuff, not be mini-canned jokes. (And categories are particularly bad canned jokes). If you have overly-redundant categories, then the content tends to be separated for no good reason. The "separation of American Mormons" argument does make must sense either, since almost all notable Mormons are Americans. To prove this, can you name a notable non-American Mormon off the top of your head? --Mn-z 01:13, October 10, 2010 (UTC) Jesus.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  11 Oct 2010 ~ 05:53 (UTC) Jesus was not a Mormon, although I think Simon Magus and Valentinius help opinions that were close to Mormonism. However, we don't have an article on them, so my point stands. --Mn-z 10:38, October 11, 2010 (UTC) No, Jesus could not have been in the church whose official name is the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day Saints. It not having been the Latter Days. Spıke ¬ 10:45 11-Oct-10 (Jeez Mn-z that was supposed to be a joke!) Well with your argument Jesus wasn't Christian either, which I think is also wrong. Besides, I'm sure Jesus is Mormon since they had that whole Golden Plate ceremony thing indoctrinating Him in.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  12 Oct 2010 ~ 05:22 (UTC) I'm not suggesting that things be moved from one category to another and deleted on the other one. They both can stand alone, no? This isn't wikipedia, so categories are both tools and--in some cases--jokes, at least to some of us users. They are not either/or but both. I'm now tempted to make a non-American Mormon category, and leave it empty, or use that overused tumbleweed gif. But bottom line, Mitt Romney alone needs more than just "Mormons" as one of his categories, and this one seems to fit. Aleister 13:20 10 10 Romney is both notorious and ridiculous and deserves an article that is funny and/or scathing. But he needs nothing special in the Categories. Silly fine print at the bottom of an article won't make or break it; and, as when an author changes the name of an organization he is ridiculing: It slightly breaks the "encyclopedia" cover, and it forces the reader to look something up by the punch line. Spıke ¬ 13:53 10-Oct-10

President Jar Jar

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Honestly... has this been kept so long simply because it's so bad? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101013 - 02:19 (UTC) Delete. I loved Jar Jar for the same reason that most of the viewing public seems to have hated him: He was finally a space alien who talked funny (compare Vulcans) and didn't even make sense, along the way ridiculing the Hindus whose speech his resembles. Now, is this article going to be funnier than its subject? Hardly. It starts by distracting the reader with stage direction on why the author isn't going to work further on it, is seriously confused as to whether it's about a being or a nation, and descends into wibble: pi/10, grues, sporks, and bestiality. I won't speculate cause and effect to answer Lyrithya's question--but yes, this article is very bad. Spıke ¬ 02:42 13-Oct-10 Delete. Crap sticks. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:47, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Garbage. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:21, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Well, that went nowhere. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:30, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Delete. This is an example of why fictional president articles generally suck. --Mn-z 01:23, October 14, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Nostalgia Critic

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Keep. I like the Nostalgia Critic! Yes, I know he was blatantly offensive at some points (including the whole Mako saga, which wasn't his fault--he just forgot to check for cause of death--mental retardation jokes about Jonathan Brandis, who he didn't even know committed suicide until the elephant in the room informed him about it, and his autism joke, about which the only thing I find wrong is how some of my kind actually succeeded in huffing the joke--and that's terrible), but still, he's a pretty funny guy. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryanasaurus0077 (talk • contribs) Stipulated. The article, however, is not. Spıke ¬ 18:21 13-Oct-10
Delete (5)	The only thing worse than this faggot is Uncyclopedia itself. I was almost stupid enough to think he was funny. but fortunately, I saw the light and realized he's an unfunny, whining, irritating hack with a MONUMENTALLY RETARDED fanbase. Even though we're even worse, that doesn't mean this cock sucking queer deserves a page here. Or anywhere else for that matter. grmbl grmbl *insert something racist and unfunny here, whatever my usual schtick is* poop. Jesus, even I'm funnier than this guy and I'm the stupidest man alive! --Roman Dog Bird 01:44, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Who is Doug Walker? If he is the author, this is vanity. If he is a TV humorist, he is orders of magnitude more funny than this article. If both are true, it would explain the many grudges that seem to be aired in the later sections. At any rate, an animated GIF--with the name of an external web site--does not take the place of actual, original humor. Spıke ¬ 02:09 13-Oct-10 Delete. Let him peel his own potatoes. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:49, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:28, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I think I'm missing something. It doesn't seem overly important, though. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101014 - 03:42 (UTC)
Comments

Linux Incorporated

Score: -2
Keep (2)	I need help. I.P. Anon here has a winning concept: Given the popularity of Linux, there must be a Mister Linux somewhere in our history whose story to tell. And he is also smart enough (smarter than he is in English grammar) to see that such a story won't get you far in this article; you will need to turn a mean phrase. He doesn't do it quite right, and walked away in 2006 from a stubby, photo-free article. I'll do a copy edit, but--this article being set in the 1600s--I need Romartus to tug it in some new, historically accurate directions, as well as What was your name again? to feed it pix. Spıke ¬ 10:12 11-Oct-10 Romartus didn't think he was the man for this page, but he is attacking it with a vengeance! It already towers above VFD-readiness. Spıke ¬ 15:47 12-Oct-10 Keep. Because you seem to be trying. Though I should probably stop using VFD for let's see if SPIKE will clean up this article experiments... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101013 - 00:18 (UTC) Again, Romartus gets the Save on this one--I cleaned up the old stuff but he breathed new life into it. Spıke ¬ 01:57 13-Oct-10 Okay, I'll run a let's see if Romartus cleans up this article experiment next. Although you got him to. Well done. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101013 - 02:16 (UTC)
Delete (0)	Delete. What is this? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101011 - 06:03 (UTC)
Comments	Nomination withdrawn. MadMax 04:10, October 14, 2010 (UTC)

:Category:Goat Blower

Score: -3
Keep (5)	Keep. This is just funny for funny's sake. Goat Blower. ha ha ha ha. Better than poopy-head. Blowing a goat would be kind of a special trip, except for the kicking portion, those hooves packing a whallop. Aleister 00:28 10 10 So, you're a poopy-head and a goat-blower! Ha ha ha ha ha ha Spıke ¬ 00:36 10-Oct-10 Practice makes perfect, and I haven't had a goat complain yet. Aleister, blowing in the wind 00:52 10 10 Point out the member of this category who doesn't blow goats and I'll vote against. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:18, October 10, 2010 (UTC) Hooray for goat blowing! ~ 08:20, October 10, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Sometimes things are taken too seriously on here. While most of these should be kept to a minimum, a few are amusing.--Sycamore (Talk) 08:02, October 11, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Since I sniggered when I read 'Goat Blower' - that counts as a keep for me. Poopy head is so Junior Uncyclopedia anyway. This punches harder. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:07, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Delete. A typical "I don't like this guy's politics, lets call him a poopy-head" category. It doesn't really categorize anything because there is no good reason why any article should (or should not) be in this category. --Mn-z 00:10, October 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Per Mn-z, as you know. Spıke ¬ 00:30 10-Oct-10
Comments	Kept --ChiefjusticePSX 21:55, October 13, 2010 (UTC)

Template:Azumanga Daioh Fans Only

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. A template used on only one article that's currently in userspace and will likely never get out of there. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:31, October 12, 2010 (UTC) Delete. per above. Even if its a userspace template, if it only goes on the author's page, it doesn't need to be in mainspace. An energetic admin might want to userspace it, but deleting it is also ok. --Mn-z 23:26, October 12, 2010 (UTC) Delete. What they said. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101013 - 00:00 (UTC) Dittoes. Spıke ¬ 02:02 13-Oct-10 Delete. Category:Categories That Can Massage My Ego (..now don't tell me this one actually exists!). --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:53, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:19, October 13, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Sakaki Blush

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Same junk as above by the same person who made the junk above. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:42, October 12, 2010 (UTC) Delete. what I said about the other template. --Mn-z 23:26, October 12, 2010 (UTC) Delete. What they said about the other template above. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101013 - 00:01 (UTC) More dittoes. Spıke ¬ 02:03 13-Oct-10 Delete. Add my name to the firing squad detail. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:55, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I bet you feel so special bein ranked #2 in the SPED class. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass.15:20, October 13, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Invisible Pink Unicorn

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. While the original idea of the Invisible Pink Unicorn is a parody religion highlighting inherent nonsense in any religious belief this article is just disjointed and a bit listy. There's not much humor and the idea never takes off. In fact, it crashes rather badly after the first section. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:25, October 12, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Someone can recreate it when they have an actual article. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101013 - 00:02 (UTC) Delete. The intro is okay despite weaving between describing a religion and a condition that has a "victim." Then we go, in rapid fire, to listcruft, to a denial that the article is of interest to the reader, and then to totally dopey. Spıke ¬ 02:01 13-Oct-10 Delete.A one liner. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:56, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Piss. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:18, October 13, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Please categorize the pic of the invisible Pink Unicorn. Thanks. Aleister 1:59 13 10

Template:OWQ

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	This is perverse. Used in Linux Incorporated, the OWQ (Oscar Wilde Quote) template uses the single argument as the name of a page underneath Template:Wilde. In the case of Linux Incorporated, it references Template:Wilde/Linux Incorporated, a Wilde-ism template destined for use in exactly one page. This is a bizarre impulse to store all the Wilde-isms in the same place for no discernible reason. Instead, these quotes should be manually inserted into the page for which they were written. Spıke ¬ 10:32 11-Oct-10 PS--Some of the templates beneath Template:Wilde may show no pages linking to them, if they are used only via {{OWQ}}, and some may have been intended for use on a single page that has already been deleted. Now, how many bytes did this technique save? Spıke ¬ 11:13 11-Oct-10 Delete. per above. --Mn-z 22:01, October 11, 2010 (UTC) Delete. And I though I used bad coding practices... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101013 - 00:13 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:23, October 13, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	There are 112 pages that use {{OWQ}}. In some cases (such as Bowling), the separate document holds multiple Wildeisms. Spıke ¬ 23:37 11-Oct-10 I believe the point of this template is to store all the Wilde quotes at Uncyclopedia:Wilde/A (and the following pages) using {{OWQL}}. Rambling on about Oscar Wilde used to be considered funny back in the day, i.e. 2005. At any rate, we should probably delete those pages, all the Wilde quotes that exist as sub-templates, this page of epic listcruft of randumbness, and probably the mainpage to the God-forsaken Wilde project. But, I'm getting ahead of myself... --Mn-z 00:02, October 12, 2010 (UTC) Perhaps; my nomination was not a commentary on the Oscar Wilde meme as much as on the bizarre nature of putting related contents of a hundred different articles in a separate folder. Spıke ¬ 00:46 12-Oct-10 Can't it be both? But on a more serious note, if we get rid of this template, we will probably need to get rid of Uncyclopedia:Wilde/A (and related pages) too, since I think they are interconnected. --Mn-z 01:58, October 12, 2010 (UTC) Yeah, they should be moved into their respective pages, and it will be a chore. Spıke ¬ 02:00 12-Oct-10

Request to undo deletion of {{OWQ}}

Despite your vote to delete {{OWQ}}, I ask admins to restore it (and Template:Wilde/Bowling and Template:Wilde/Java, which I sent to QVFD as part of the clean-up). One hundred pages are broken, and the cleanest way to fix them is to undo our vote, unless we decide to eliminate the system in which Wildeizms are used on pages and also assembled on a page of their own. There has been majority, but not consensus, opinion to do this, here and in Forum:Trim back the Oscar Wilde Project?, but based on very little input. Spıke ¬ 10:28 18-Oct-10

Comments

Comment. Yup, pages definitely missing stuff. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:39, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

• Undeleted -- The Zombiebaron 19:07, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

Category:People without birth certificates

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Keep. It is a joke about Barack Obama HAVING a birth certificate. It's also a category with a bunch of typical "I don't like this guy's politics, lets call him a poopy-head" names thrown in erroneously. -- Recommend limiting it to B.O. & those who were born prior to birth certificates being issued.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  11 Oct 2010 ~ 06:01 (UTC) And we tell the joke, in Barack Obama's birth. What is gained by slapping this category on random pages? Spıke ¬ 10:02 11-Oct-10
Delete (6)	Delete. Another typical "I don't like this guy's politics, lets call him a poopy-head" category. Its basically a list of Republicans, with a few random names thrown in, and maybe a few people who actually don't have valid birth certificates. --Mn-z 00:16, October 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Useless. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101010 - 00:17 (UTC) Delete. Per Mn-z, as you know. Spıke ¬ 00:31 10-Oct-10 Delete. Not as funny as yesterday, or the day before that, or the. . .Aleister 00:31 10 10 Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:34, October 11, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Bastard category. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:04, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. VFD tag added. Timer in place. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 22:03, October 11, 2010 (UTC)

Battle for Bikini Bottom

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Let's see how many of these bags of dog shit you'll tolerate. The other part of Loopygrumpkins little personal kiddie-pop universe, Spongebob Squarepants Vs. Invader Zim, got saved. How about the rest of the continuity?--Count of Monkey Crisco 04:37, October 12, 2010 (UTC) Delete. The last one's intro turned me off as "salesy," but that beats the pompous, first-person rant that begins this one, as well as the graphic that discloses that this one goes with the other one. Mainspace is not for oddball new episodes of your favorite TV show, but for pages that seem to be encyclopedia articles until you start reading them. I am guessing that any amusement will be to fans of the show, as most of what humor there is (and illustrations) seems to comes from there. Spıke ¬ 09:35 12-Oct-10 Delete. Snore bore. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:58, October 12, 2010 (UTC) Delete. and we seem to have a category of likely deletion fodder in Category:Silly wars --Mn-z 23:24, October 12, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I liked the overall war one, but this is taking it too far. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101013 - 00:05 (UTC) what sort of monkeyspank writes shit like this. --Roman Dog Bird 01:34, October 13, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Paint stripper

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. One sentence paragraphs, crappy mini-lists and a useless story make this article far below average in a nonspecific way. There's just not much there at all. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:52, October 12, 2010 (UTC) Delete. The quotes actually made me laugh. But there is nothing to the article. Its only comedy concept is anthromorphizing a jug of the stuff. Yawn. Spıke ¬ 00:57 12-Oct-10 I had this little idea of what it could be like, and it mutilated all my hopes. Kill it, I say. Kill it! ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101012 - 01:01 (UTC) It's so bad it's scary. -- 01:02, October 12, 2010 (UTC) Obliterate. Drink the substance in question. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:26, October 12, 2010 (UTC) Delete.Drink your own white spirit next time author(s)! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:59, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Some of my best friends are...

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. The concept is acceptable but this either needs massive expansion or it's not fit to go on. The article can't stand on what has to be the flimsiest list I've seen in months. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:02, October 12, 2010 (UTC) Delete. epicly listly. --Mn-z 00:06, October 12, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Stubby: The eighth dwarf. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:01, October 12, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Ain't an article, but such a concept... I hadn't the heart to vote against. So I convinced my heart I was abstaining and then copied this into the against thing when it wasn't looking. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101013 - 00:08 (UTC)
Comments	I won't vote against, as I do like the concept: Ridicule the tendency, shortly after berating a Poib, to chest-thump that Some of my best friends are Poibs, to counteract the matching absurdity that a disrespect of one of them means you hate all of them on the flimsiest of grounds. Of course, this concept does not require a list at all. So the article is utter crap, and the concept is undeveloped, without massive work. Spıke ¬ 00:55 12-Oct-10 Attention!!! User:MadMax, when you revert an article in VFD to an older version which you believe to be better you have to remember to bring the VFD tag into the restored version. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:52, October 12, 2010 (UTC) Comment. Sorry. Just wanted to revert to the version around the time of the last VFD. The recent stuff to the list added by IPs was removed. I added the <choice> tag just to give some ideas if someone wanted to play around with the list. There's probably a random text template that could cover that though. MadMax 01:52, October 13, 2010 (UTC)

Category:Purple Planet natives

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. random category that doesn't categorize, only used on 2 articles. --Mn-z 01:20, October 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. ...neither of whose subjects are natives of the Purple Planet; about which, why does it redirect to Jupiter? And why does Jupiter use a special font? Spıke ¬ 01:23 10-Oct-10 If it's aiming to confuse, it's doing its job. But badly. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101010 - 18:38 (UTC) Disintegrate. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Saberwolf116 (talk • contribs)
Comments	Point of information: Jupiter is actually a banded mixture of white and tannish orange-red, not purple as this category asserts. --Mn-z 01:28, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

Category:If you work in the government, vote Donald Howe for president!

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. This appears to be random nonsense. A google search of the phrase, in quotes, only links to 6 pages, 4 on this wiki and 2 that are off-wiki links to this category page. --Mn-z 00:28, October 10, 2010 (UTC) If you work for the government, vote to Delete. this category. Aleister 00:30 10 10 Delete. A category whose text is gibberish. Real helpful. And gibberish isn't terribly funny either. Spıke ¬ 00:32 10-Oct-10 Delete. Eh? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101010 - 18:37 (UTC) Delete. I shall not. --Wilytank 20:02, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Orangez

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	It's so bad it's scary. -- 22:34, October 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. This signed, first-person rant was banged out--sadly, in twelve sessions--with no thought about a humor concept. Spıke ¬ 22:44 9-Oct-10 Wow. I, er, don't get it. At all. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101009 - 22:49 (UTC) Obliterate. You removed the ICU tag twice, this is what you get. --Wilytank 22:54, October 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I would say redirect to Orange, but this article is only linked from here, and the vitally important unused redirect of History of PEE!!! --Mn-z 23:56, October 9, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Burak

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. I have no idea what this is, and that is not even in a good way. It looks like... well, I can see why someone tried to qvfd it. Which is, incidentally, the only thing linking to it. Until now. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101009 - 21:48 (UTC) Delete. According to Wikipedia, he's no one. And his six random quotes and two random paragraphs would work equally badly on any other nobody. Spıke ¬ 22:02 9-Oct-10 Ugh. Fail. --Wilytank 22:08, October 9, 2010 (UTC) Burak is GAY. it is the worst article EVER it suxs. it used the template from AAAAAA!!!! because it didnt have any content of its own. Even though it thought it was funny. i dot like it and niobody should because it is gay and stupid and ugly and retarted and fat. i wish it will gats deleted from uncyc. and goes to the moon or a gay retared place. it is GAY GAY GAY GAY!!!!! IT IS THE WORST ARTICLE EVER. IT IS SO BAD. I HOPE IT A SPLODES. Delete. per above. --Mn-z 23:53, October 9, 2010 (UTC) WTF?  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  11 Oct 2010 ~ 05:49 (UTC)
Comments

Dildus

Score: -5
Keep (5)	Keep. Very clever concept: A disease that progresses from the common malady of Being a Dick to physically becoming a phallus. The listcruft should go, except that the final section, Cultural References, is downright funny. Too pseudo-scientific, and like the template says, needs pictures. Spıke ¬ 17:52 8-Oct-10 Now completely copy-edited, with a few new twists, and a couple of photos from our library. The closer you read this, the funnier it gets; many of the names were medical puns. Spıke ¬ 18:44 8-Oct-10 Keep. SPIKE shoots, scores, yet again! Nice save. Jeez, this guy should really put on a suit, go into upper management here, trade his soul in for a beamer, and institute the corporate thing at Uncy. Someone has to do it, and who better than Spike!!! Aleister 19:50 8 10 Keep A bit of mess, but so is my bedroom. Interesting idea, and so is my bedroom...anyone remember 'Changing Rooms'? mAttlobster. (hello) 23:25, October 8, 2010 (UTC) Keep per the fixing of it. --Mn-z 23:38, October 8, 2010 (UTC) Indeed. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101008 - 23:41 (UTC)
Delete (0)	Delete. random article about a made up disease that causes people to turn into dildos or something. --Mn-z 16:53, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Nomination withdrawn. MadMax 21:31, October 9, 2010 (UTC)

Ayn Rand (robot)

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Keep This has a wonderful flourish to its writing. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:35, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Delete. short, random, and about a fictional topic. We have a better article at Ayn Rand (it could use a pruning, but it does have funny sections.) --Mn-z 15:30, October 8, 2010 (UTC) Sadly, I must say delete for the article as a whole... but this bees idea is certainly something. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101008 - 16:15 (UTC) Delete. A needless auxiliary to the Ayn Rand article. I must disagree with Lobster that there is anything special about the writing; the grammar is merely fair, and the choice of material is garden-variety Randumbo. Spıke ¬ 16:26 8-Oct-10 It's so bad it's scary. -- 19:36, October 8, 2010 (UTC) pointless --Wilytank 19:41, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Though we may lose Ayn Rand (robot), Spikes creation of the phrase 'garden-variety Randumbo' means some good has come from this. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:49, October 8, 2010 (UTC) Thanks, but I regard Romartus as the coiner of "Randumbo." Spıke ¬ 01:09 9-Oct-10 A fifty-fifty split of praise it is then. I'd be tempted to watch X-Factor if I thought Simon Cowell was capable of such put-down verbal melody. mAttlobster. (hello) 01:46, October 9, 2010 (UTC)

Sir Kindle

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. banters on, relatively coherent, but lacks any humor. --Mn-z 15:13, October 8, 2010 (UTC) D- It reads like a 3rd grade book report. Like MnZ said, there's no humor either. --—John Lydon 15:22, October 8, 2010 (UTC) Delete Sometimes there are articles that are not funny but at least they try to be funny. This doesn't seem to try to be funny. This is odd. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:38, October 8, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It's... boring. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101008 - 16:13 (UTC) Delete. Starts as an unremarkable bio of a nonexistent person; then jumps the shark and the time-line. No humor in either half. Spıke ¬ 16:22 8-Oct-10 Ugh. I'm sorry we haven't heard of you. --Wilytank 19:45, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

UnScripts:A Typical Day for A Pregnant Gardevoir

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. unfunny (& non-erotic) banter about a pregnant pokemon. --Mn-z 15:03, October 8, 2010 (UTC) It seems like only a few months ago, I was fully retarded - That about sums it up for me. --—John Lydon 15:26, October 8, 2010 (UTC) Delete No effort went into this shit. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:39, October 8, 2010 (UTC) delete Hush about forbidden topics, please.--Poiz, look in my info? 15:51, October 8, 2010 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! A sad fanfic. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 12:21 10/8/10 Delete. Er... that's... er... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101008 - 16:19 (UTC)
Comments

April 20

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Wrong! (Unless this is connected to the anniversaries template, which I'm almost sure it ain't) --Count of Monkey Crisco 14:14, October 7, 2010 (UTC) Delete. gibberish on Hitler's birthday LOLOL!!!1!!11!1!!one --Mn-z 16:44, October 7, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Just a list and a poor one at that.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:47, October 8, 2010 (UTC) Delete. A significant date, as it's one of only 365. Quite rare. And someone could do a better 4/20 page for the marijuana holiday, or maybe it's already here. Aleister 9:39 8 10 Shredinate. Listy... very listy. And opening the page with "blah, blah, blah" doesn't suggest much forethought in it. --TheSlyFox 09:41, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
Comments