Uncyclopedia:VFH/Filial Piety renom

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Filial Piety (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Filial Piety	Score: 3 pervy grampas
Nominated by:	~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 04:28, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
For: 15	NF As my first act as new better-than-you, I nominate this article.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 04:28, 25 June 2009 (UTC) Five. Or is it six? Maybe seven. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:28, 25 June 2009 (UTC) Mustard. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:30 Jun 25, 2009 4 - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 04:30, Jun 25 Mustard. —Sir SysRq (talk) 04:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC) Forever and always. -RAHB 04:32, 25 June 2009 (UTC) for Again...and again...and again... The President of Iran WOODY! DeathLife? to the infidels! Go USA? 04:53, 25 June 2009 (UTC) For. Feel like it ImNotASunbeam 05:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC) For I know this is archived...but please...for the love of god...I MUST VOTE FOR THIS! Saberwolf116 05:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)  For. It's a nice article, actually. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:43, 25 June 2009 (UTC) For I love Gramps! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:26, 25 June 2009 (UTC) if this is still a real vote...then, for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC) weak for 0_- --Gelert 00:02, 27 June 2009 (UTC) Abstain.—Flutter (Talk•Games•Fun Pages•Awards•Help) 23:31, 29 June 2009 (UTC) Comment. Try not to be confusing. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:43, 29 June 2009 (UTC)  For. I liked it.    Orian57    Talk   11:38 2 July 2009
Against: 12	Against. Per the other times. Plus per this whole thing being a tad dodgy. I hate to come across as the buzzkiller, but FFS... --UU - natter 10:23, Jun 25 Against. --Docile hippopotamus 10:36, 25 June 2009 (UTC) Against. Just didn't tickle me. T. (talk) 10:37, 25 June 2009 (UTC) Against. Still. Again. Move on, people. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 11:53, 25 June 2009 (UTC) Against per the last 6 times. --Mn-z 15:18, 25 June 2009 (UTC) Against. IronLung 22:42, 25 June 2009 (UTC) Against. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 01:19, Jun 27 Against.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 09:52, 27 June 2009 (UTC) Against. Now that I've read it, it just didn't make me laugh. Maybe I'll be in a better mood when it gets renommed next month. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:23, 27 Jun Against. I just couldn't find the funny! Pup 20:39, 28 June 2009 (UTC)  Against. Well written, bad concept. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 08:52, 30 June 2009 (UTC) Against. Sort of a snowball against. It didn't blow me away. This nom is gonna fail either way. pillow talk 20:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Jesus guys - how are we gonna strike any vote for sockpuppetry again if this shit goes down? I really hate to come across as the fun-hating bastard here, but if this ever does get featured, it shouldn't be because of this kind of blatant fucking about. --UU - natter 10:23, Jun 25 Damn you against voters. Damn you all! Saberwolf116 15:52, 25 June 2009 (UTC) I'm expecting to be a lot more than damned when TKF gets hold of me... --UU - natter 15:54, Jun 25 I don't care how long it takes- i'll nominate this every month for a year if I have to- I will NOT STOP UNTIL THIS IS FEATURED!!!! Saberwolf116 15:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC) That's it, I'm leaving you! Your obsession with this page has ruined our marriage! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:17, 25 June 2009 (UTC) I'm purging all the "dodgy votes" and votes that show inordinately retarded judgment. This is still a real nomination, as Gerry mentions, so let's have a clean slate. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:42, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH