Uncyclopedia:VFH

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

VFH contents

• All nominated articles
• See also

• Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
• Voters: Please try and include some kind of reasoning. When voting against, explain where the article falls short so that the author can perhaps try and fix it up and improve it.
• This is not a discussion page. If you'd like detailed feedback on your article, please submit it for a PeeReview.
• Want a gadget that lets you mark the articles you've already voted on? Follow the instructions here to enable it.
• View recent changes for VFH here, and if deleted nominations are showing up and that bugs you, .
• Due to a technical glitch caused by DPL being a dumbass, any signature with two dashes (i.e. "--") will cause the VFH page to go kaput.

Any and all violators of policy will be hit by a wrecking ball.

   

VFH status:
3.21 votes per article • Goal: 5

Search VFH archive

VFH is not a discussion page. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.

All nominated articles

Rob Gronkowski

(feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: 3 Gronk spikes
Nomination:	OranguTang94 (Complaint board) (Damage trail) 00:51, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
For Votes: 3	Nom and for. Congrats Patriots on making another Super Bowl! (kill me.. if it's not the Chiefs, it's the Pats..). Here's an article on your famed tight end, not wide receiver, who likes the number 69! (I did this article in the style of how Gronk is portrayed on the web cartoon Gridiron Heights) OranguTang94 (Complaint board) (Damage trail) 00:51, 26 January 2026 (UTC)  For. Mr. George / talk 00:59, 26 January 2026 (UTC)  For. OᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏHey, that tickles! (vandalize my talk page) 01:00, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0	No against votes

12-year-olds invading the Internet

(feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: 1.5 years older than 12!!! shut up bro imma haxx ur computer and stop maikng fun of kids dude >:( NOT ALL OF US ARE LIKE THAT!!!!! im basicall an ADULT I WATCH ADULT VIDEOZ ON TEH INTERWEBS DUDE ndks9939mksosidisowojsj839'wk:#:#)fls
Nomination:	OᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏHey, that tickles! (vandalize my talk page) 23:39, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
For Votes: 1.5	For. loiterally me bro!!! i'm practiaclly an adult tho >:) 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) ☀️ 23:44, 25 January 2026 (UTC)  Half for. Holy quote hell! It's a bit lengthy, but a funny read! Lucyna K 01:00, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0	No against votes
Comments	Comment. the "how 12 years-old" section is quite outdated. either there should be a new section detailing how modern 12-year-olds talk on the internet, or just replace it altogether with modern gen alpha lingo. or maybe mix both, just to create an unholy amalgamation. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 00:28, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

The Simpsons

(feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: -1
Nomination:	OrdinaryJoe1234 (talk) 03:22, 24 January 2026 (UTC)OrdinaryJoe1234
For Votes: .5	Half for. Hey, I enjoyed it. Well-structured but slightly lacking in the humor department. OᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏHey, that tickles! (vandalize my talk page) 23:51, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
Against Votes: 1.5	Half against. tbh, this feels like it was a full article once upon a time, that was dissected, and only a few pieces are left now. It's hardly about the Simpsons at all, and really just about Matt Groening. There's gold in these hills, but it's buried deep. Lucyna K 04:46, 25 January 2026 (UTC)  Against. Mr. George / talk 00:02, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Kirkification

(feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: 3.5
Nomination:	Therealcmack (talk) 14:23, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
For Votes: 3.5	Love! This very hip with the kids. Purplexed (talk)  For. I wrote this one and I think it's my best work so far (which isn't a high bar to clear since my other articles are well, uh, not great.) And since the Kirkification trend is kind of not dead yet, I think it'd be cool to have it featured. Therealcmack (talk) 14:23, 23 January 2026 (UTC)  For. He stood unshaken, a voice in the storm. A man of conviction, a heart reborn, he spoke the truth when the cost was high. He lived for Jesus, unafraid to die. We are Charlie Kirk, we carry the flame! We'll fight for the Gospel, we'll honor his name! We are Charlie Kirk, his courage our own! Together unbroken, we'll make Heaven known! A husband, a father, his family held near. A home built on Scripture, on faith without fear. The world tried to silence him, but his voice remains; In us it echoes, in Christ it sustains. We are Charlie Kirk, we carry the flame! We'll fight for the Gospel, we'll honor his name! We are Charlie Kirk, his courage our own! Together unbroken, we'll make Heaven known! The battle is raging, the darkness will fall. We rise with his spirit, we answer the call. The truth is eternal, the Cross is our guide, with God as our captain, we march side by side. We are Charlie Kirk, we carry the flame! We'll fight for the Gospel, we'll honor his name! We are Charlie Kirk, his courage our own! Together unbroken, we'll make Heaven known! We are Charlie Kirk! Forever alive, We are Charlie Kirk! With God we will rise! OrdinaryJoe1234 (talk) 03:26, 24 January 2026 (UTC)  Half for. Mr. George / talk 01:02, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0	No against votes
Comments	Abstain. I'm too baffled to analyze this article. OᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏHey, that tickles! (vandalize my talk page) 23:40, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

UnNews:Trump still wants Greenland; Wall Street shits itself

(feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: 2.5
Nomination:	Purplexed (talk) 00:42, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
For Votes: 5	For. Purplexed (talk) 00:42, 22 January 2026 (UTC)  For. You know what? It may be because of my Cannuck bias, but it doesn't suck, eh? 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) ☀️ 01:44, 22 January 2026 (UTC) Yes. Noopnurf, Noopiest of Nurfs 20:28, 22 January 2026 (UTC)  For. It's funny and written in a unique style but it could definitely use some copy edits. Considering this was made by a new user, I'd say it's good enough to be featured. Soviet☭ (Ask for free votes) 20:47, 22 January 2026 (UTC)  For. I am still, in no way an authority on good articles. But you know what, having another look at it, I like it. It's short but sweet, and seeing as it was written by a new user, it's a pretty damn good news article. Therealcmack (talk) 13:57, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
Against Votes: 2.5	Against. Another UnNews article about Trump being a dumbass, how original. OᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏHey, that tickles! (vandalize my talk page) 01:15, 22 January 2026 (UTC)  Against. There is a reason why the TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) and "Orange Man Bad" memes are still alive, if on their death beds. I think Trump is a horrible leader but we really need to stop with this this.Oh, Kurtz, you can do stupid things! 15:50, 23 January 2026 (UTC)  Half against. Mr. George / talk 01:01, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Comments	My greatest work yet, it's only my second but I'm determined to make something amazing Purplexed (talk) 00:42, 22 January 2026 (UTC) Abstain. having been to Greenland before, I can confidently say it is the world's most useless landmass, and is about as fun to visit as watching ice melt... coincidentally, that is all there is to do there. Lucyna K 11:43, 22 January 2026 (UTC) @OPOSSUM: @ColonelKurtz: Normally I'd agree with you, TDS sucks balls. But I don't think that applies here, we satirize basically everything and that's good. You can still support good satire and be pro-Trump. Maybe the language in it could be toned down a tad Noopnurf, Noopiest of Nurfs 21:27, 22 January 2026 (UTC) @Purplexed: You can indent by adding colons (:) to the start of a message in the code :) Noopnurf, Noopiest of Nurfs 21:30, 22 January 2026 (UTC) I'm not pro Trump either, and don't get me wrong, this isn't a bad article at all, PF4Eva would be proud. But originality. That's what seperates the good articles from the featured ones. OᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏHey, that tickles! (vandalize my talk page) 17:22, 23 January 2026 (UTC) Comment. @Noopnurf: where was the Joe Biden articles when he was derailing America into the ground? where were the y when Obama was making healthcare a fantasy? that's right, no whereOh, Kurtz, you can do stupid things! 18:09, 23 January 2026 (UTC) Oh, Kurtz, you can do stupid things! 18:09, 23 January 2026 (UTC) @ColonelKurtz: The page for Obamacare literally redirects to a page called 'HowTo:Create a Healthcare system that kills people'. They've all been fairly lampooned here. Outside here is a different story Noopnurf, Noopiest of Nurfs 18:19, 23 January 2026 (UTC) @ColonelKurtz: I probably would've made articles on that if my account wasn't made six days ago, it isn't just Trump I love making fun of all politicians. Fact of the matter is I wanted to make an UnNews article and Trump happened to be the politician doing stupid shit at the time. It isn't TDS or bias I just make fun of whoever's in the news. The whole reason the memes are alive is because he's the President in office, and is constantly on the real news for one thing or another, constant new stories. It isn't beating a dead horse if said horse is actually still alive and making stuff that can be mocked. Purplexed (talk) Comment. @Purplexed: Yeah well there is a reason late night comedians mocking trump became a deconstructed parody. Orange man still bad?Oh, Kurtz, you can do stupid things! 19:52, 23 January 2026 (UTC) Oh, Kurtz, you can do stupid things! 19:52, 23 January 2026 (UTC) It's not like Trump is the only thing being posted on UnNews if you want a different article to be featured just nominate it. My first two articles were about Trump because it was breaking news, is that the thing I'll make articles about? FUCK NO. I'm not brain dead. I'm not spamming articles about the guy. I'm currently drafting a humorous UnNews article about the sun right now. My point is that Trump jokes are repeated for a reason, and while some are unoriginal and spammed, that doesn't mean they all are. Purplexed (talk) Comment. trump will always be in the news because the media is obsessed with making him look like satan incarnate. plus we have articles going back to 2016 mocking him. nothing has changed in ten years. Oh, Kurtz, you can do stupid things! 21:43, 23 January 2026 (UTC) @ColonelKurtz: Because he's a very active political figure, the reason Obama and Joe Biden aren't talked about as much as Trump is once again because they aren't politically active anymore. Of course he's going to be in the media he's the President of the United States. It isn't abnormal for someone who is trying to make big moves in politics to be in the media, Kamala Harris's was talked about for a few months at most because she was a candidate for president, but as soon as campaigning was over she vanished since she was no longer politically active enough for there to be an interesting story to cover. The reason he's been talked about for so long is because he's been politically active for so long. Purplexed (talk) Comment. rumors are kamala harris is gonna try her hand at the 2028 election so we might have plenty of material then Oh, Kurtz, you can do stupid things! 00:53, 24 January 2026 (UTC) Precisely Purplexed (talk)

UnNews:RFK Jr. fat-shames Annoying Orange

(feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: -1
Nomination:	Purplexed (talk) 18:12, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
For Votes: 1	For. I wish to reach "In The news" at least on the main page Purplexed (talk) 18:14, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
Against Votes: 2	Against. This isn't the place to get it in the news, i think that's just kind of judged off of merit. Probably should go to Pee Review first before here juuuust sayin... Lucyna K 18:35, 20 January 2026 (UTC)  Against. It's a good article, but it's not VFH-worthy. @Purplexed:, I can add it to the front page in the "recent news" section. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) ☀️ 23:01, 20 January 2026 (UTC) That would be appreciated, thank you @Gergdown: Purplexed (talk) 08:39, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Comments	Sorry Purplexed (talk) nahhh nah, don't be, the UnNews column system is... well, perplexing. Lucyna K 18:43, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Unquotable:John F. Kennedy

(feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: -2
Nomination:	OrdinaryJoe1234 (talk) 21:41, 19 January 2026 (UTC)OrdinaryJoe1234
For Votes: 0	No for votes
Against Votes: 2	Against. I'm not really feeling it! Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump • 04:54, 20 January 2026 (UTC)  Half against. Good, but not really my taste Purplexed (talk) 18:27, 20 January 2026 (UTC)  Half against. some parts are good, others feel like humorless hatred. WHICH CAN be funny, but falls flat here Lucyna K 04:19, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
Comments	This is half lists and needs a fair bit of work. Has potential though ShabiDOO 19:14, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

See also

Old VFH archives: 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14