Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive47

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Antidisestablishmentarianism

Keep
Delete
  • Yet another ancient stub that managed to slip through FFW. - Sikon 12:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. ----OEJ 15:24, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Yup Burninate the deadwood. -- di Mario 19:35, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete it! I'm a government man! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  • meh --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is <insert name here>'s style of work. --EMC [TALK] 02:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments

GNAA

Keep
Delete
  • Sucks. - Sikon 07:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. The actual article, which was very underdeveloped, was damaged by Andreus' addition of the idiotic and cruftilaceous paragraph of GNAA repetitions. ----OEJ 15:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Dilithium and normal matter, confined in the same space at the same time. <-- This is what should happen to it. No redeeming value whateverseau. -- di Mario 19:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Baleet! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:07, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Um, yeh.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:41, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete immediately --General Insineratehymn 02:48, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Chrysanthemum

Keep
  • Weak for At least it has been researched somewhat. Plus I like the graphic. -- di Mario 19:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep but expand: The article has a good concept. It's somewhat consistent, it has a few chemistry/decoration crossover jokes, it just isn't very well-expanded. I think it's possible to put more in it, somehow. Knocking out the last bit with the rifles would be a good start. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 22:22, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Actually kind of funny, just needs help. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep it does need help, and the joke is there, if not obvious on first sight of the title, you get it as you read the rest of the page.--Witt, Union leader.gif of Union member.gif UNion Entertain me* 02:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  • It's not crap. That opening paragraph is pretty good, actually. Plant humour...who'da thought?--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:39, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Ja. I always follow the crowd. --EMC [TALK] 02:44, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for. Hardly strong, but it's likely you'll find worse hitting "random page" 10 times.
Delete
  • Delete - I just plain don't like it. --AAA! (AAAA) 02:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Lacks non-random humor, though the idea is technically feasible.----OEJ 15:18, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Kraut

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • This triple-A person surely does not behave like one. Where is your saintly-hood ? -- di Mario 19:15, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

The

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • If this is one of your so-called Wikian in-jokes, I don't get it. Thuh! -- di Mario 19:10, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
    • Um...no. --AAA! (AAAA) 00:13, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Star Wars Kid

Keep
  • Needs more about being a warrior and fad, less the other stuff. Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • Give the author a fair chance. The article has been there for less than 48 hrs and is constantly being worked on by the author and others. Vide as per edit history. I think this is a promising n00b and you lot should not shy him away. User:Guest, I require of you to make an apology to the author and aid him into become Uncycs next Noob-of-the-month. -- di Mario 19:06, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Not overly repulsive. Needs a lot of work, granted, but worth keeping, methinks. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 19:10, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep for now. If you want to be mean, add NRV instead. herr doktor needsAscalpel Rocket.gif [scream!] 19:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Mr. Briggs is right--Witt, Union leader.gif of Union member.gif UNion Entertain me* 02:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Sucks, I don't know how I could possibly miss it during FFW never mind, it was created yesterday. - Sikon 17:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • In all fairness, it is on Pee Review. Not sure about intent, though.----OEJ 18:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Band geeks

Keep
  • Merge into Geek. Alksub 08:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

*Merge into Geek.--Winston 11:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

  • keep Not seeing anything wrong with it, there's way worse stuff around here.--Count of Monkey Crisco 18:38, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge Although basically this article is a list of lists (LoL), there are some funny parts. And by the way, is there some such thing as a serial geek ? -- di Mario 18:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • An example of how repeating a joke that was funny when SNL did over and over and over again ad nausiem is not freaking funny. --Sir Zombiebaron 03:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments

it's just not funny...and way too cliche (con acento!) --Cjagahatshi 04:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Minister of laughter and monkfish

Keep
  • Keep. I like it. And silly ministers have good comedic precedent; my local paper referred to the Ministry of Silly Walks just recently. Not to mention the Shadow Minister for Not Listening to People. Needs pictures, though.----OEJ 16:24, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep Alksub 08:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep It's funny, but needs some work. Send it over to Pee Review.--Imp88 09:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep--Winston 11:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • As a the Canadian Minister in Charge of Picking Up After Yourself, I say, "Hip hip hurrah!" --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Huff -- Paw print.jpg 12:17, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not funny. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au.png 16:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Applied the VFD template tag macro expansion wotsit. I personally have no opinion either way. -- di Mario 18:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Goatse Virgin

Keep

Keep.- I'm no fan of the topic, but I dont think it is deletable. --goshzillacorrespondence 18:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Delete
  • Delete - Stupid, not funny, and people were littering this with goatse and tubgirl links (which I've removed [1]). --AAA! (AAAA) 04:53, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Unfunny. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au.png 16:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill it --General Insineratehymn 16:50, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • --~ Tophatsig.png

    Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

    22:44, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Baleetish Mildly funny, but not funny enough to warrant the topic. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:35, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Funny, but shitty. --EMC [TALK] 02:48, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Tim the Enchanter

Keep
  • Weak keep Parts are mildly amusing.... Alksub 08:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete. As much as I revere things Pythonic, this article is short and uncreative.----OEJ 03:50, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Crap. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au.png 16:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete--Winston 11:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Baleet! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Parodying Python is like trying to pin Julia Childs in a wrestling match.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Oh! Python as in Monty! At first I thought Python as that Perl wannabe marvelous scripting language created by some fellow Dutchman. Talk about gawky. Aaawrk! Polly want a cracker. -- di Mario 18:41, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes, not as in Pirate the Python compiler for Parrot...what? The "real" world just went all surrealistic on me. Ouch, that smarts.----OEJ 02:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Hey, that's Dutchiness for you. All my days are like that... -- di Mario 21:46, 7 December 2006 (UTC)


Frank West

Keep
Delete
  • Delete - Vanity? If not, it's still crap... --AAA! (AAAA) 02:41, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable subject, non-funny article.----OEJ 15:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Pipkin

Keep
Delete
Comments

The merchant

Keep
Delete
  • Begone It is old and smelly and noone likes it. --Sir Zombiebaron 22:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Vomit It's painful to read. --fish 06:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, then write 00000000 over the drive. Alksub 08:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's nonsensical and not funny, and the layout is horrible.--Imp88 09:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete--Winston 11:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Monorow

Keep
Delete
  • Huff -- Paw print.jpg 12:19, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments


Pope of the Ring

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Undeveloped, unfunny.----OEJ 02:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Too short for too long. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au.png 16:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Alksub 08:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete--Winston 11:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Baleet!--Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Ruins two of my favourite things, "the" and "of". Sigh...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Dinosaur sex

Keep
  • Weak conditional keep on converting it to a news article Alksub 08:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete - Weird. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:37, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. A possible idea, but in the real Uncyc nobody ever develops these things. ----OEJ 02:45, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Consists of unfunny quotes. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au.png 16:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete--Winston 11:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Baleet! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Ronaldinho

Keep
Delete
  • This was never funny, and now resembls Wikipedia:Ronaldinho. --Sir Zombiebaron 19:57, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Lame, so many red links that you'd think it was written in blood. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au.png 16:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Reads like a drunk sportscaster. Alksub 08:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete--Winston 11:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Should be QFVDed instead. It was never funny indeed, but it was severely vandalized with CTRL+V by some moron that turned it into a serious piece. I hope the trend does not catch on. herr doktor needsAscalpel Rocket.gif [scream!] 22:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments Probable copyvio as stated above; tagging accordingly. Pentium5dot1 20:49, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Now listing on QVFD. Pentium5dot1 01:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Now huffed. Pentium5dot1 01:42, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Diversity

Keep
Delete
  • Homoginize, So short and unfunny. --Sir Zombiebaron 19:44, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Crap. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au.png 16:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Alksub 08:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Baleet --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Gul Dukat

Keep
  • It's tough going against the author...but this isn't crap. Granted, I'm not a SpaceTrek geek, but this isn't awful.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:40, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • keep It is in fact very funny. -- di Mario 11:21, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Few get help in pee review, so being ignored there is not a reflection on your article.--Winston 11:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep I don't see why you think this sucks. Mr. Briggs Inc. 12:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Delete
  • Delete. It didn't seem to work at all. I tried to get a Peer Review, but nothing came of it. Perhaps someone else can make something better out of it. --Lenin & McCarthy 23:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's not really in the style of Gul Dukat. And even if it were, you wouldn't be able to tell (I think). Alksub 08:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments

N'aix

Keep
Delete
  • This is merely an inside joke (if you could call it that) about Dota. While I play Dota, it's a) kinda/no it's actually very retarded and b) it makes really no uncyclopedic sense whatsoever. It also has too many facts. Railcgun (timestamp AWOL)
  • Burninate it. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 17:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  • frituurstaaf I hate inside jokes. I'm allways the butt of them. - di Mario 19:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I am not insider enough to get the joke, but with regards to technique the article is very very bad.----OEJ 02:50, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Nobody cares. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au.png 16:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments

All of User:Gert5's subpages

Keep
  • Keep this is a work of art, you great unwashed :) -- di Mario 19:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. What's next? The cabal dictates how many userboxes one can link to their page? Or how many images? Unless a user has subpages teeming with porn or hate literature, give them some room to enjoy themselves.--Winston 11:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Let him do what he wants with his subpages. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 09:32, 5 Dec 2006
Delete
  • Per a cabal discussion on IRC. This is getting out of hand. - Sikon 14:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Hold up. If he wants to create an UnPoetia project (like UnBooks), then why don't we punt that into the open? —Hinoa KUN (talk) 17:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
The problem is quality control. I suggest he or she be given a deadline to have it worthy of the main space or becoming an actual sub project, and if it isn't, then wipe. While I think subpages should generally be respected, I think this has too much of a potential for abuse as it exists now.
The purpose of subpages should be the development of material for Uncyclopedia, not for some other purpose, as this appears to be. The simple fact of it is that Uncyclopedia is a humor site, not a webhost, and an extensive network of subpages that is intended to stand alone, rather than be a scratch area for the purpose of drafting material for the main space, creates a balkanized website within Uncyclopedia that is not part of Uncyclopedia, and would not have the same quality or rationale as Uncyclopedia.
As the Benson supporters would say, this should probably be removed from our holy lands, but in the practice of believing in the user's good faith, he or she should be given time to improve the content so as to perhaps make it an actual subproject or namespace here instead of just a network of userpage subpages. At the very least, time to backup the code should be permitted before huffing. --Hrodulf 19:53, 1 December 2006 (UTC)


Weird...I parodied people filling their userpage with non-Uncyc stuff as a bit in a recent UnNews article. No, I'm not going to name the article, that would be whoring. It's an odd coincidence, that's all.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:36, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For some reason, I would accept comments 1 and 3, which is obvious. Actually, UnLyrics (renamed UnPoetia for no reason) was started by Anidnmeno, altough I don't think that you'll find anything from his original User Page --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN

UnNews:Doctors warn of the dangers of excessively "playing with your Wii"

Keep
  • Keep - I like it. Why would you VFD this in the first place? "Wee" is a funny word. Makes me laugh. --EMC [TALK] 23:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. (1) It's definitely made up, and I know because, well, I'm the one who made it up, and (2) The joke is that the whole article has a double-meaning (and it's not "Wee" replaced with "Wii"). On the one hand (pun intended), it can be: an innuendo-filled warning against masturbation, and on the other hand (pun still intended) it can be just what it says on the tin: a literal warning against "playing with your Wii" (ie. the game) too much... which is why all of the "warnings" are worded so carefully (so that both meanings are preserved). -- Wicked cScott (talk • log) KUN PIE NS FP 08:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, I agree, it's not the usual pun with this console name, I have even wrote one with this kind of pun. This is a lot cleverer than mine. --—Braydie 09:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. It's funny, I like it. - Sikon 09:23, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep --AAA! (AAAA) 22:57, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep: Obvious and well-expected pun mixed with a parody of a real-world news article warning about overplaying the Wii due to the fact that it actually requires you to move more than your thumbs. It's hard to come up with something better suited for UnNews. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 01:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. It's a fine article.--Winston 11:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete

This is an article that isn't made up, Just a true article with "Wee" replaced with "Wii" --NXWave 06:48, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Comments

Masters of the Internet

Keep
Delete
  • Randumb - Sikon 05:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  • It's either a terrible parody of clans, or it's vanity.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:31, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. ----OEJ 02:56, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Crap. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au.png 16:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 11:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Abstain! There is no Cabal! Or is there ? Nahh! -- tinc 19:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

"HEAT GEM"

Keep
  • Keep Obviously, the author has put a lot of effort in it and some parts are actually satirical. Man. look at the artwork! Perhaps if others started to mess with this one, it might one day even make VFH! -- di Mario 19:25, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep It's not hilarious, but it's still pretty good. Prolix 06:53, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep This article has a lot of potential for redeeming value. The images were time consuming and a lot of hard work was put into this to let people enjoy it. Please do not delete this article. We can edit it some if needed. Keener 11:43, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep I spent quite a bit of time on the article and it isn't just pointless drivel. Sure it doesn't have the polish that an VFH article could but it's not pointless. If anyone wants to put suggestions on the talk page then they can help to improve the article than just try and delete it. Master Fuzz 1:00, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - But add {{Rewrite}} to it. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:42, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • I rarely submit articles, but I figured I'd better check to see if anyone knew wtf was up with this article. I see no point nor value to this article. Anyone have a counter to this opinion? Bone F clear.png Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 12/1 03:06
  • Holy Vanity page! The creator's image contributions indicate either a predisposition for 'chopping himself into pics, or he really loves that guy.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:29, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Move to user subpage.--Winston 11:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment That won't work, because the creator of the page is 216.70.249.98 (an IP). Should we have a vote to see who gets to keep it? --AAA! (AAAA) 01:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


Gaylord Nelson

Keep
Delete
  • Huff Worthless vanity shit. --General Insineratehymn 21:04, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  • dealaite indeed. Ah agree with aboveses. -- di Mario 19:15, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill - Even though I don't know what "vanity" means, it looks stupid. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:39, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Randumb. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au.png 16:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • What Mitch said -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 19:03, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Humanity

Keep
  • tentative according to one of the authors on the articles talk page, This is an okay concept, I'm going to "fix" it Prolix 04:21, 1 December 2006 (UTC) I think this is an OK concept too. -- di Mario 19:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Tentative I'll do what I can with it, for a guy who sucks at writing articles. Prolix 07:04, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • GLEE!. For one, it's short, but it's good. And there are pipe-links!--Witt, Union leader.gif of Union member.gif UNion Entertain me* 07:13, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Declare genocide. - Sikon 14:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

The Gay Team

Keep
Delete
  • Eww! - Sikon 06:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ

Keep
Delete

Take it down I'm not even going to defend it. My article sucked and I'll admit it. --{Talk to me}Lovebones{Contributions} 19:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments

User:Sandeep

Keep
  • Confused or not, it's a Userpage...and there are much worse--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 14:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. A userpage should not be judged as an article, for the plain and alimentary and simple reason that it isn't an article. Mind you, as Mowgli notes this user has not contributed anything except his user page...er, so does just any old riff-raff who registers get a userpage? ----OEJ 03:05, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • -- don't know what to make of this page? the user has zero contributions to "main" -- mowgli 11:33, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Undecided I've looked around a bit on the authors website and my impression is that he created this user page while under the impression that Uncyclopaedia is a serious yet maybe not mainstream blog. I'll leave a message on his talk page. -- di Mario 19:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Aparna Kher

Keep
  • tentative. Somewhere in the edit history there is a User:LeeHarveyKennedy, who as you may not be aware has four (coun't 'm) VFH's on his CV. Apparently, he didn't feel it necessary to VFD this article. Although I must concur that presently, 't aint much. -- di Mario 18:57, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • -- either a vanity page or else nonsense. -- mowgli 07:51, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I can't find a reference to a notable person named Aparna Kher, so I suspect a vanity article. LeeHarveyKennedy notwithstanding this does not appear to be a solid subject.----OEJ 03:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Indiana Ford

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Undecided Seems like a rather run-of-the-mill article, quality-wise. I've read worse. If it turns out this was made by a 10-year old, I might even give some praise to the author just for encouragement. -- di Mario 18:45, 28 November 2006 (UTC)


Five Klee Pictures

Keep
Delete
  • Sucks pigdick. It lacks a Wikipedia article, and hasn't been edited into anything. --UNKNOWNFILE 01:49, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Abstain. I cannot decide. The idea is funny in itself, and the execution ... a bit short but doesn't deserve expletive swearwords in describing it. -- di Mario 18:21, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Ninja/People

Keep
Delete
  • 1) Lists. 2) Suck. 3) Pigdick. --UNKNOWNFILE 03:21, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Dilithium Indeed, just a list of lists. No added value or fit for any purpose. -- di Mario 20:48, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  • A list that does not deserve to be spared --~ Tophatsig.png

    Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

    23:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • This page is here as a subpage of Ninja because that page keeps getting filled with an unfunny list of people. This is the garbage-can of the Ninja article. I designed it that way, and it needs to stay. If you don't like it, don't click on the link. I have no remorse for banning users who add unfunny lists of people to the Ninja article when a specific page for it exits. It's like a honey-pot for asinine users. Bone F clear.png Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 11/27 23:41

Austin Powers

Keep
  • Hold it right there! I realise it's a bit meagre, but I see some potential. Also, the work was originally started in april, 2005, and has been revisited by several parties on a regular schedule. Obvously, this is not a one-off abandoned piece of crap. Someone ask the original author(s) to expand a bit, add some images, and hey presto, a star is bourne. -- di Mario 20:27, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Pooper Nintendo

Keep
Delete
  • Wipe its smells and is crappy. --Sir Zombiebaron 18:58, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Good God delete. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Shove this mike up its ass. --UNKNOWNFILE 03:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Just, wow. --Hhamdy283 03:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delaite. Thou shaltest not taketh my name in vainism. -- di Mario 20:17, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Hell Desk

Keep
  • Keep. The article is uneven but substantial and has funny bits. The Hitler pic captioned "Ach mein Gott im Himmel! Zere is no 'Any Key', just press one ov zee buttons, dumbkopf!!!" is great.----OEJ 20:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Please hold onto this article Alksub 07:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I did a stint in Hell Desk and it's all TRUE! I remember it fondly in retrospection. Makes you wonder where I am nowadays, eh ? -- di Mario 10:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For worth a chance. --Sir Zombiebaron 18:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • keep. what's this doing on vfd - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon.jpg - 18:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep...but clean it up. --Hhamdy283 03:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  • It's all true. Sad, but true.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:03, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • --L 10:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against -- I'm sorry; I really am. This article, however, makes me cry. --EMC [TALK] 23:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

The Jetsons

Keep
Delete
  • Sadly, I didn't notice this page during the FFW, because otherwise I would have huffed it with no regrets. - Sikon 19:06, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff. But we need an article on this subject. herr doktor needsAscalpel Rocket.gif [scream!] 19:59, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff "The Jetson 5" is the best part of the article. --Sir Zombiebaron 06:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Short, pictureless, uninteresting.----OEJ 19:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Alksub 07:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon.jpg - 18:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Page Full Of Links

Keep
  • Merge with Hyperlink. We can expand that page that way. --Micoolio101 07:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge indeed. Invite some of the authors (I see Zombie Baron and Splaka amongst them) to merge as per the above. -- di Mario 10:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Merger Although I have no clue what di is talking about (and my name is one word! With a lowercase b!) --Sir Zombiebaron 06:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
I thought I saw entries by Zombiebaron in the edit history. I looked at it again just now and apparently are mistaken, because in fact it's not on it. My most sincere apology, kind Sir. -- di Mario 10:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Acctually I did edit it, but I didn't "write it" - 20:33, 25 October 2006 Zombiebaron (Talk | contribs) (revert link spam linked wrong) --Sir Zombiebaron 18:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • We have a gazillion articles like this one, and this is not the best one. - Sikon 07:04, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • We already have something like this. It's called Do NOT click any links! --General Insineratehymn 07:20, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Has been made a redirect so its not gonna die. --Sir Zombiebaron 18:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


Spelling Errors

Keep
Delete
  • We have a gazillion articles like this one, and this is not the best one. - Sikon 07:04, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • meh --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:52, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Dilate! this looks like a group effort executed by several sockpuppets fitting around the same hand at different times -- di Mario 10:04, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Moo its like every article I ever wrote, before the spell check. --Sir Zombiebaron 06:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Fort knox

Keep
  • Keep, just funny all around, this is just the kind of article that does NOT need to be put up for deletion. Mr. Briggs Inc. 18:47, 23 November 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • Not great, but not crap. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:51, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Alksub 07:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Huff -- Paw print.jpg 12:36, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • meh. I've seen worse with these sad puppy eyes of mine. -- di Mario 15:47, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Abstain. Lacks writing style, but the main idea is interesting. Someone could add some elegance to the text (someone... where's that guy?). herr doktor needsAscalpel Rocket.gif [scream!] 18:21, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Jewish Media

Keep
Delete
  • It sucks get rid of it.Hardeehar 16:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Wow, it's rare that you see an writer put his own page here.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:08, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  • You are really wierd, Hardeehar... herr doktor needsAscalpel Rocket.gif [scream!] 01:13, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Actually, I am wierd and Hardeehar is weird. But insulting Barbara Streisand and Albert Einstein in the same article automatically condems it. Delete I say -- di Mario 15:44, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Blatantly anti-semitic. Get rid of it. --General Insineratehymn 07:17, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Nah ahh, You're weird. Hardeehar 04:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

The Purple Elephant Brigade

Keep
Delete
  • Buh? -- Paw print.jpg 11:16, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Dead end. It's not so awful. The article has so-so nonsensical humor, but were you would link this stuff? herr doktor needsAscalpel Rocket.gif [scream!] 18:28, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Squash it --Micoolio101 (whine • vandalism) 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Chute it Too random. Alksub 07:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Added the VFD template. And btw, those elephants are pink, not orange! -- di Mario 15:39, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • NeedABrain: This is niether a deadend (it links to other pages) nor an orphan (pages link to it) --Sir Zombiebaron 06:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Cellular Automata

Keep
Delete
  • Um, what? -- Paw print.jpg 11:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Worthy topic, low-quality article.----OEJ 00:56, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Life is a cellular automaton and life sucks. No but seriously, indeed: worthy subject, shoddy execution. -- di Mario 15:33, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Throw a weigh Alksub 07:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

It's a shell of it's former self. Revert. Neoliminal 04:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Never mind, delete it. Neoliminal 04:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

what's there is fine it's just at least 5 times too short. neoliminal, move it to your userspace and carry on working on it - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon.jpg - 18:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Twenty-four things to do at Best Buy

Keep
  • Keep I've done some of those things when I was 13 and remember them fondly. It is a nice article. -- di Mario 15:28, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Best Buy! Mr. Briggs Inc. 18:51, 23 November 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • Strong Keep More like UN:VFH. I laughed so hard I cried. --Goshzilla 02:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Well we need SOMETHING here that mentions Best Buy, lol. --RedPooka 05:08, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • KEEP!!!! as per Goshzilla. --Weatherman1126 06:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Just needs to be listised. Alksub 07:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete: Looks like someone mistook "parody of an encyclopedia" to be "my Geocities funny joke page lolz". I would've listed this for Forest Fire Week, but I was feeling generous. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 06:37, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  • AAAARGH! this sucks. no, yuo Tanks-12px.gif chat 13:25, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  • delete. just not funny - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon.jpg - 18:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Zac taylor

Keep
Delete
  • This could be the root of many vanity pages, and seems to be about a non-notable college football player--Nytrospawn 04:45, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: This could've wound up as a somewhat funny idea for an article on Zachary Taylor, former US President, but instead it looks like a badly-formatted, linkless, vanity page dump. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 06:40, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Alksub 07:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • even if it's not vanity it's still not anyone notable, and even if he is notable and i'm just ignorant, it's still not funny - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon.jpg - 18:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • I added the VFD template today. Other than that, I'm impartial -- di Mario 15:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Sea-cucumber

Keep
Delete

Delete I'm putting this here despite forest fire week because I don't get the joak at all -- the "article" is nothing but The Walrus and the Carpenter by Lewis "Opium Pipe" Carroll. Can anyone explain why this is an "article"?----OEJ 23:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Alksub 05:20, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, or atleast give it some context. As it is, its just a word for word for Lewis Carrolls thingy--Nytrospawn 03:30, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  • killkillkill - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon.jpg - 18:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Kush Land

Keep
Delete

Delete. Short, mostly misspelled, possibly a vanity entry by a player of the NationState sim game.----OEJ 16:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete --EMC [TALK] 22:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Short and not funny. Alksub 05:20, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Wandering faggot-bird

Keep
  • Keep - While the idea is a bit like ED humor, it's actually not a bad article. Definitely not worth a delete, but could use some improvement. Sometimes things don't get that much attention in the Pee Review. --EMC [TALK] 22:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep My only criticism is that the (to be arranged) section is a bit aimless. It needs to be REORG'D. Alksub 05:20, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep I just finished my first article and hey, it's hard work!. Give the man a chance -- di Mario 15:13, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • i say keep, but not by much - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon.jpg - 18:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

I put this on Pee review awhile back and got no bites. It's a fairly lame subject and I would like to either hear that other people want it to stay (and finalize the ending) or dynamite the article and sink it. What thinky, chums?

  • Alksub, on the Pee review thing I asked which of the endings was best, intending of course to finalize that ending and delete the others. But then this article became not so much a frigate-bird as an albatross.----OEJ 15:31, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • OK, so people seem to think the article is OK. What I'll do is use Ending #3 and do a fairly large rewrite overall, maybe come up with some fresh inspiration along the way. Thanks. ----OEJ 18:41, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Caning it

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Short, pictureless, unwitty.----OEJ 15:38, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --EMC [TALK] 22:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Gets a bit listy. Alksub 05:20, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Roman Villa

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Nice table. But no, it does not make sense or laughter.----OEJ 15:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --EMC [TALK] 22:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Its way too short, and not really that funny either.--Nytrospawn 03:31, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I agree with the above entries. -- di Mario 15:10, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • the idea might work but what's here isn't worth keeping - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon.jpg - 18:21, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Stupid "Life of Brian" pun. Not funny. Yawn. --EMC [TALK] 17:56, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Jewsplosion

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Four short sentences and some templates do not an article make.----OEJ 15:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --EMC [TALK] 22:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Where

Keep

I think, with the proper modifications, this could be a good article--Nytrospawn 03:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

  • I think if you are willing to do those mods, it could be a good page. If not, it will probably continue to suck.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete Short, uninteresting, non-contentful.----OEJ 15:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --EMC [TALK] 22:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Meh --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Way too short, and every other word is a link. Hurts the eyes. The concept is worthwile, but the execution sucks. -- di Mario 15:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • no - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon.jpg - 18:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments


Padua college

Keep
Delete
  • I figure I'll let democracy handle this, rather than be all unilateral and shit. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 07:16, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Ecuador

Keep
  • Weak keep. The introduction about watermellons is very long and messed and needs to be thinned. But Christina Aguillera as a dictator is very appealing to me - I almost thought I was reading Wikipedia. Alas, I think Christina Aguillera is a damn serious option when compared to Lula or Chaves. herr doktor needsAscalpel Rocket.gif [scream!] 02:26, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Painful!. This article really sucks!! Maybe the worst country article I've read--Styago 01:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • It would be best to start from scratch; the beginning is a mess and the end is a list.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:28, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

19100

Keep
Delete
Comments

Genius

Keep
Delete
  • Randumb. Kitten Huffing, Oscar, Steve, Your Mom - you name it, it's there. - Sikon 14:55, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm A Genius. This is not. no, yuo Tanks-12px.gif chat 15:03, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff. Better we find a real genius or a real idiot to rewrite it. herr doktor needsAscalpel Rocket.gif [scream!] 15:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • --~ Tophatsig.png

    Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

    00:35, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • It seemed to have lowered my IQ points. --Onion 20:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Starts out barely OK, but degenerates to subgenius quickly.----OEJ 16:28, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Don't Mention Meat or Someone Will Hit You With a Banana Cream Pie Day

Keep
Delete
Comments

Brightside

Keep
Delete
Comments

Philology

Keep
Delete

Huff - -- Paw print.jpg 19:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Kakun

Comments


Geese Howerd

Keep
Delete
  • I just made a mistake while writing on the Search to create the article. "Geese Howerd" instead of "Geese Howard". Dumb move. But happens. - Alca Vicius
    QVFD?--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Press 2

Keep
  • Press 1 to save. It's short, but it's quite funny.-- Paw print.jpg 13:02, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • See below. --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacer.gifIcons-bomb.pngSpacer.gifSwitzerland …MUN F@H 23:34, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Is there a Press 1? --EMC [TALK] 23:39, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Press 2 to delete--Winston 11:51, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Broken and not worth fixing.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:33, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Press 3

Keep
  • See above. -- Paw print.jpg 16:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete. Utter crap. A comment in the history says something about it being part of a series, but the "What links here" pages disagree. --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacer.gifIcons-bomb.pngSpacer.gifSwitzerland …MUN F@H 23:34, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Press 1 to delete--Winston 11:52, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Broken and not worth fixing.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:33, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Central Heating For Tramps

Keep
Delete
  • Delete - Uhh... --Micoolio101 (whine • vandalism) 06:50, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Nope, can't find anything here. --General Insineratehymn 06:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Short, stupid, ugly, short, poorly written, short, unfunny, and short. --EMC [TALK] 20:05, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Waste it. herr doktor needsAscalpel Rocket.gif [scream!] 21:22, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Trample -- Hindleyite 21:23, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete.--Jtaylor1Small Egg.png 21:50, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Drown. In alcohol, if you can spare some. How could that thing survive since March 2005? Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacer.gifIcons-bomb.pngSpacer.gifSwitzerland …MUN F@H 22:32, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Executed; voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)03:56, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

God's Cousin Ted

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Dead content. Short, random, no pics.----OEJ 16:52, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Agree. herr doktor needsAscalpel Rocket.gif [scream!] 19:04, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • This was made on October 25th. Why it wasn't tagged with an NRV is anybody's guess. --EMC [TALK] 20:16, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Agreed. Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacer.gifIcons-bomb.pngSpacer.gifSwitzerland …MUN F@H 21:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Complete, utter crap. Destroy immediately. --General Insineratehymn 08:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill it. -- Hindleyite 21:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Executed; voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)03:55, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Boca Juniors

Keep
Delete
  • Actually a candidate for QVfD, but it never made it there.... As no users with superpowers answered on IRC, I guess that's the way it's supposed to be done. --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacer.gifIcons-bomb.pngSpacer.gifSwitzerland …MUN F@H 01:19, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Burn under Protocol 1.01 and 9.0.--Jtaylor1Small Egg.png 03:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Nothing much.----OEJ 16:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • It's a real football team, but it should still be deleted. -- Hindleyite 16:56, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Pretty dumb. If every soccer addict have to write articles about other teams than his team like this, better we don't have any article about soccer teams. herr doktor needsAscalpel Rocket.gif [scream!] 19:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete--Winston 11:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Rita Verdonk

Keep
  • Keep. I like international articles if only because articles of interest to Yanks and Pommies dominate Uncyc. I will take responsibility for a top-to-bottom rewrite and de-uglification. Pls check back and re-evaluate the ardickle, should take only a few minutes from the timestamp on my sig...----OEJ 16:58, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep OEJ's rewritten version.--Winston 11:54, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Ditto. -- Paw print.jpg 13:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • OK, I cleaned up Rita Verdunk -- I mean the article on Rita Verdunk -- as much as I am able. Please, Your Highnesses, review and see if it is still deletion-worthy.----OEJ 18:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Category:Unpersons

Keep
  • Below "Unpeople" template focuses more on users than articles AgentAlpha 08:44, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • If nothing else, "category:Unpeople" and "Category:Unpersons" could be merged into one.AgentAlpha 08:44, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I created "category:Unpersons" and I would have no problem with merging the two. Hell, just say the word, and I'll do the legwork myself. Mr36 03:51, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Well, go on then. -- Paw print.jpg 13:07, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Done, yo. Though some miscreant keeps adding the stuff back. Mr36 20:57, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Taken care of. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 21:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Alan Cox

Keep
  • Keep it. Cox [[2]] is as real person, a computer hippie. It's not vanity and I will always support mockery on Linux enthusiasts. herr doktor needsAscalpel Rocket.gif [scream!] 19:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Expand--Winston 11:57, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete - Stubby, and probably vanity. --Micoolio101 (whine • vandalism) 05:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • It's not vanity, but it's crappy none the less. --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacer.gifIcons-bomb.pngSpacer.gifSwitzerland …MUN F@H 05:55, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Huffity huff huff. -- Paw print.jpg 11:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • meh. Sure it's not vanity, but it's not good either. Hasn't been really edited since april, so I don't think it's going to get better either. --Anyone 20:03, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Too many memes. --EMC [TALK] 23:36, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Anal Cocks In its present form it is rubbish. bin please. no, yuo Tanks-12px.gif chat 13:00, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Thetans

Keep
  • I should feel shame, but this tickles me just a bit.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and improve. Everything that is bad for Scientology is good for you.

herr doktor needsAscalpel Rocket.gif [scream!] 19:57, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Delete
Comments

Vast underground tunnel networks

Keep
Delete
  • Begone. -- Paw print.jpg 22:32, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • No. Just no. --Anyone 22:51, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I guess even I could have done better. --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacer.gifIcons-bomb.pngSpacer.gifSwitzerland …MUN F@H 22:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • To the limbo. herr doktor needsAscalpel Rocket.gif [scream!] 19:59, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Could conceivable be worked up into something, but currently only 4 sentences and a list. Not enough.----OEJ 18:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • A good idea but it needs to wait until someone can do it properly.--Winston 11:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Konrad Adenauer

Keep
Delete
  • Bah. Maybe Famine can ban the internet again. --Anyone 22:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Shite. -- Paw print.jpg 22:41, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete--Winston 12:03, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Early VanAkin

Keep
Delete
  • sigh. No, this is funny, it really is. --Anyone 22:17, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Unfunny indeed. --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacer.gifIcons-bomb.pngSpacer.gifSwitzerland …MUN F@H 22:57, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Vanity.--Jtaylor1Small Egg.png 21:45, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete--Winston 12:04, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Hmm. Probably just on the wrong side of funny and not-funny. -- Paw print.jpg 13:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Fly Emirates

Keep
  • lol that map be funee --Redribbbon 21:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Embryonic political satire. Needs expansion but the idea -- a full-bore, completely democratic government -- is sound.----OEJ 18:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. This one has potential to turn into a nice piece of conservative humour. herr doktor needsAscalpel Rocket.gif [scream!] 19:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Expand--Winston 12:05, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • I don't know anymore. --Anyone 22:14, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • err. wtf, maybe? --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacer.gifIcons-bomb.pngSpacer.gifSwitzerland …MUN F@H 22:55, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Slander.--Jtaylor1Small Egg.png 03:39, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Nice map, put it somewhere worthwhile. -- Paw print.jpg 13:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • In the USA the current Republican argument for dissing democratically elected governments they don't like is that "democracy doesn't mean free and fair elections, it means elections in which the people the USA favors always win." So the article to hand -- a satiric exploration of the meaning of democracy -- is timely and relevant. Though it desperately needs revision and expansion.----OEJ 18:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • You're right about one thing--that it does need improvement. But the same can be said about every article anybody puts on VFD. They all need improvement. Now some articles which have seen traffic recently might actually get edited and improve some day. Other articles which have a good concept or theme going for them also might see improvement. But articles about a fly shaped island in the Mediterranean sea have little chance of that happening. VFD is the place for getting rid of articles that suck at the moment, and have a low chance of getting better. We can all sit here and say something just needs to get better, but most of the time it simply won't happen. --Anyone 15:48, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Superconducting Super Collider

Keep I'd added a small section. In any event, I think we should improve this rather than delete it (possibly also consider changing the name to CERN since that's what it is trying to make fun) --– Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshuaZ (talk • contribs)
Delete
  • wtf? Stupid, randumb dumbness. But if it was Superconducting Super Colander then there might be something. I just don't think Uncyc has enough articles about tools for straining vegetables. --Anyone 22:11, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • No, sorry Memes do not funny make. It has potential for a wiki sprok of LHC (no wait we have one of those.) Kill. no, yuo Tanks-12px.gif chat 13:05, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • An article on CERN would be a nice idea, but it's unlikely to get expanded unless someone who's already worked on it does it. JoshuaZ, your cue. -- Paw print.jpg 13:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

C-SPAN

Keep
Delete
  • hmmm again. Sure, it's not crap. But what's there is not all that great either, and certainly not keep-worthy. To all those who might say it only needs work -- It hasn't been edited since May, and even that was only an IP. So as much as it might seem like a keeper, do the right thing - set it free! --Anyone 22:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Strange it survived that long without being tagged with anything.... --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacer.gifIcons-bomb.pngSpacer.gifSwitzerland …MUN F@H 22:11, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Burn in hell.--Jtaylor1Small Egg.png 03:25, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Be off with you. -- Paw print.jpg 13:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

The home telephone system

Keep
Delete
  • meh. Just a much worse version of that article that I don't remember (but it exists, I swear). It's also junk. --Anyone 22:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Unfunny. --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacer.gifIcons-bomb.pngSpacer.gifSwitzerland …MUN F@H 22:09, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • How about you try and find the article, then merge this one in? It's not that bad. -- Paw print.jpg 13:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

August 3

Keep
Delete
  • Crap. Might be well hidden vanity (note the birthdays and it was created on august 3) but it's hard to say. Regardless, it's crap. --Anyone 21:42, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Agreed. --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacer.gifIcons-bomb.pngSpacer.gifSwitzerland …MUN F@H 21:55, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Boone's Farm

Keep
  • Will see if I can add to this. The bit about fine "sediment distribution" is priceless. Perhaps you don't know of this beverage? Bone F clear.png Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 11/11 17:05
  • Famine say keep. Monkey see, monkey do. -- Paw print.jpg 13:19, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
Retrieved from "https://en.uncyclopedia.co/w/index.php?title=Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/archive47&oldid=5642007"