From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
- Voters: Please try and include some kind of reasoning. When voting against, explain where the article falls short so that the author can perhaps try and fix it up and improve it.
- This is not a discussion page. If you'd like detailed feedback on your article, please submit it for a PeeReview.
- Want a gadget that lets you mark the articles you've already voted on? Follow the instructions here to enable it.
- View recent changes for VFH here, and if deleted nominations are showing up and that bugs you, click here to purge the list.
- Due to a technical glitch caused by DPL being a dumbass, any signature with two dashes (i.e. "--") will cause the VFH page to go kaput.
Any and all violators of policy will be hung, drawn and quartered by
Grues.
Goal: 5 votes per article
Search VFH archive
VFH is not a discussion page. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.
All nominated articles
(feature) (remove)
(feature) (remove)
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
|
Score: 4 member(s) of Parliament
|
| Nomination:
|
Pasmorade (talk) 20:28, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 4
|
 For. I love how the article parodies this far-right prick. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Pasmorade (talk • contribs)
For. Fenris2010 (talk) 02:49, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
For. The article seem quite classical but ok. TiazuGotAutism333 (talk) 07:36, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- For.
 18:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
|
Score: 7
|
| Nomination:
|
Fenris2010 (talk) 01:29, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 7
|
For.Fenris2010 (talk) 01:29, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
For. Hilarious. Pasmorade (talk) 16:31, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
For. Made me laugh, good article. Wikipideass (talk) 14:17, 21 August 2024 (BST)
For. this is funny, but need more work. TiazuGotAutism333 (talk) 17:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
For. Short and sweet. I give it an A. Would be cool to see done with more presidents. With all due disrespect, Tunic.Talk Contribs 13:28, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- For. 16:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- For. While this still is up, I'm going to vote for too... DaniPine3 (talk) 22:45, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
Shouldn't it be featured by now, since it's six against zero?
Fenris2010 Talk to me here. 22:34, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Fenris2010: Alula was about to feature it this morning, but then she stopped midway through. I think she has realized the article now looks a bit less finished now that I tried adding images, but couldn't find images for the latter sections. DaniPine3 (talk) 22:43, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- @DaniPine3: I think I may have finished the images. How are they? Pasmorade (talk) 04:55, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- No, i was gonna featured it, but then gave up because i couldn't figure out how i'm supposed to put an article that relies on looking like a report card on the main page. 10:30, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Alula: Well, it already has been done before, so that means there's a way... DaniPine3 (talk) 10:40, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Why not just copy the source code for the page, then paste it onto the main page, then adjust it accordingly?
Fenris2010 Talk to me here. 12:59, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
|
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
|
Score: 1 Jackson(s)
|
| Nomination:
|
Pasmorade (talk) 13:12, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 2
|
For. Why hasn't this been featured yet? Pasmorade (talk) 13:25, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
For. This is ok with me to get featured, I don't think it is a good idea for sternly forcing it must be funnier than other featured articles to get highlighted. TiazuGotAutism333 (talk) 08:56, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 1
|
 Against. I think that this article has potential, but for now I don't think it should be featured. Fenris2010 (talk) 01:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
|
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
|
Score: 0.5
|
| Nomination:
|
Fenris2010 (talk) 02:47, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 2
|
For. I think it's funny.Fenris2010 (talk) 02:47, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
For. Very funny. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Pasmorade (talk • contribs)
|
Against Votes: 1.5
|
Against. May be funny, but I wouldn't say featurable material. Also, the company it's making fun of isn't really known -it doesn't even have a Wikipedia article-, so the joke will probably be lost to most readers. DaniPine3 (talk) 01:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
 Against slightly. The point above. 18:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- I'm going to be honest right now, and this is probably going to sound slightly ridiculous, but I didn't actually know that the company actually existed. I thought it was just a funny article about a non-existent thing.
Fenris2010 Talk to me here. 00:34, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Neither did I until I browsed a deep further on the subject. Because of how weirdly specific the subject of the article was (internet meme websites), i knrw it probably was making fun of something specific DaniPine3 (talk) 00:56, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
|
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
|
Score: 1
|
| Nomination:
|
Fenris2010 (talk) 02:41, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 1
|
- For.I think it's pretty funny. Fenris2010 (talk) 02:41, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
|
Score: 2
|
| Nomination:
|
Foxtrot171 (talk) 14:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 2.5
|
- Half For. The pictures are very interesting! But I feel like the content could be a little more fleshed out.
 06:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- For. Fenris2010 (talk) 01:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- For. I made it funnier. TiazuGotAutism333 (talk) 08:49, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0.5
|
- Slightly against. Needs more content. 18:33, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
|
(feature) (remove)
(feature) (remove)
See also
Awards, Decorations and Honours
For.
Against. I think that this article has potential, but for now I don't think it should be featured. 
