Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive217

Template:AoED

Score: -2
Keep (4)	Keep it ... and take a community-wide vote on who should be on it (see comment). --TheSlyFox 07:53, October 7, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Don't see it as a problem. Maybe get it semi-protected.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:25, October 7, 2010 (UTC) Keep. but protect. But who to leave on, and in what order? Sly Fox's idea in comments sounds like fun. As Mn-z says, the template has been under pressure from lots of red-link users (little more than IP's) and one or two new users. So permi-locking it at some point seems good, but it does have a history here and should probably be saved. Aleister 12:05 7 10 Keep. But protect it as we have a possible query as to who or what goes on it. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 10:56 AM 10/7/10
Delete (2)	Delete. ok, me and Aleister have basically been edit warring various new users (and each other on occasion) regarding which 40-odd people/organizations are EVIL enough to deserve to be on this template. Since I don't feel like having an in-depth debate about whether Lady Thatcher or Dr. Robotnik should be on the template, I think our only realistic options are to either delete this or let is expand back to hundreds or even thousands of names. (see my comments for further discussion) --Mn-z 03:21, October 7, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I think at least 95% of all templates here are either vanity/useless additions which are then not used. Fewer the better in my view. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:42, October 7, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	This was last nommed one month and 4 days ago, meeting our current rules on re-nomming articles for deletion. --Mn-z 03:21, October 7, 2010 (UTC) Basically, There is really no good reason why any particular person should or should not be on this list. Therefore, when someone adds anything arguably evil, this is no good reason, beyond personal preference, why that name shouldn't be kept. For example, we can all agree that UnScripts:The Tragedy of Oscar Wilde belongs on {{WildeGuide}} whereas Green Ketchup does not. However, there is really no good reason why Ronald McDonald and King Ghidorah are on the template, while Hillary Clinton and Plankton aren't. Unless we want to have a community wide vote about each name on the template, almost any pruning that I or anyone else does to the template is little more than edit warring. Granted, I can reasonably say that the community consensus is this template should be shorter than 200 names, and probably longer than 10, but I can't say the community wants it t be 40 names long rather than 60. Likewise, I can say the community wants Fred Phelps listed and not Ł, but I can't say the community thinks it should include Enron but not Benito Mussolini --Mn-z 03:21, October 7, 2010 (UTC) I've come to the consensus with myself that I cannot be bothered to care about this one this time. Assuming I even could last time... *wanders off* ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101007 - 03:30 (UTC) I've been here a while, and this template seems to have been around forever. I say we take a vote on the site's main page. Have everyone make suggestions, then vote on the most popular ones (perhaps like they do on GameFAQs). The winners would get a spot on the list and the template could then be locked. Just my two cents. --TheSlyFox 07:53, October 7, 2010 (UTC) I considered suggesting that, but I think it will be more effort than its worth. --Mn-z 13:23, October 7, 2010 (UTC) Re:Sycamore: The article is already semi-protected. It is probably helping, but its still being edited several times a day. --Mn-z 13:23, October 7, 2010 (UTC) This template is a Randumbo magnet, and exalts the contributor without helping the reader. But I agree with the consensus: Limit the list to a reasonable number of entrants, and not on the basis that (1) He's really ghey! or (2) I don't agree with his politics. Spıke ¬ 13:33 7-Oct-10 I could live with that, in theory. However, per my above comments, the issue is how to police the list "fairly" without unholy amounts of effort. In theory, we could have a huge vote in the forums to determine which 40 articles out of a field of 300-odd candidates are truly evil enough to deserve a place on this template. However, that would probably shut down VFH for several weeks, and I don't think determining if Bowser is more evil than Tony Blair is a high priority task for this wiki. --Mn-z 16:54, October 7, 2010 (UTC) Kept ~ 09:20, October 8, 2010 (UTC)

Spongebob Squarepants Vs. Invader Zim

Score: -2
Keep (6)	Keep. Pictures are very good, I read enough of it (not every word, thank God) to see that it's literate and has a flowing storyline, and there are good phrases and twists. This maybe shouldn't be the type of page VFD should be hosting, there are much much worse things floating around in cybers-spaces. Aleister 00:19 5 10 weak keep A random person would probably find this article funnier than average. Depending on the intelligence level, they might actually prefer the pics over some of our featured articles. Despite my dislike of the genre, I don't think its quite delete worthy. --Mn-z 02:48, October 5, 2010 (UTC) week keep  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  05 Oct 2010 ~ 04:43 (UTC) Keep. This article needs a little TLC but it is nowhere near bad enough to warrant VFD. I actually thought it was a middle of the road article, with some work maybe even decent one day. --—John Lydon 18:25, October 5, 2010 (UTC) Keep. I liked what I could be bothered to read, and from the looks of things, even with the randomness and extraniety it does not seem the sort of thing worth deleting. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101005 - 23:09 (UTC) Keep. The pictures alone make this article worth keeping. --TheSlyFox 04:35, October 6, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Delete. Wacky War Story. Surprisingly coherent but still really annoying to read. --Count of Monkey Crisco 16:30, October 4, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Can't be on the fence after the salesy intro and after Section 1, introducing the Wacky War, using a nonsense number so large it breaks the formatting, and finishing with a list of memes. The remaining sections (episodes) drag out and contain no humor. Yes, author knows how to format and how to shoop, but this isn't funny, nor will it be if you write a random story featuring your two favorite cartoon characters. Spıke ¬ 20:08 4-Oct-10 Delete. Another entry in the Canon of Crap which resists removal or downsizing to Junior Uncyclopedia. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:02, October 5, 2010 (UTC) You people are out of your fucking minds. --Roman Dog Bird 01:34, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	I'm on the fence right now. It is a wacky war, but its less awful than average for the genre, and the images are rather funny. --Mn-z 17:06, October 4, 2010 (UTC) Comment. I like how two of the keep comments admit they did not read much of it. The less of this you read the better it seems. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:27, October 5, 2010 (UTC) Exactly, but as with most things, dividing by zero would ruin everything... or something. I dunno; though. I never read anything. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101005 - 23:34 (UTC) Not reading every word doesn't seem necessary once someone decides that there's enough there for a save on VFD. Some articles are obvious saves, maybe this one is, and others which are obvious goners. Sure this one is near crap status, but is technically put together OK and has a coherence and storyline to it. At some other sites it would become an example of a well writen and illustrated page, and be taught to noobies. Has anyone read every word of this comment? Aleister 00:20 6 10 Don't what other sites you are looking at Aleister but can you seriously say this is any good? It will now stay on this website in its current unsatisfactory state with no chance that it will be ever improved. An article like this is umbilically linked to its creator and if he (it's always a he it seems) can't be bothered to improve it, why should we? It is different if the article had just been about Spongebob Squarepants but it isn't. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:21, October 6, 2010 (UTC) No, it is not that good. Maybe I'm not clear of the standard here? If something is semi-coherent, has good graphics, a storyline, and the author obviously has gone to great lengths to put together a page, I've been voting to keep it. Judging other people's works is a stretch for me, which is why I don't do pee reviews (I could do them, but they'd come out lacking some of the criticism that others reviewers could do, although maybe I'll try another one.) This isn't the best or middling page, but it does have lots of Spongebob in there, in some kind of war and warroom situations, and the author's fantasy is evident. Maybe they have friends who like it, or are long gone and will come back in a year or so and fix it (I'll fix the code mistake near the bottom that throws the page off). So, yeah, that's how my mind works when looking at a page, and at times maybe I am too quick with a save vote. But there are probably thousands of pages here of worse quality that could go first. This gets long, thanks for your comments way up there, towards the sky. Aleister 17:45 6 10 I don't agree with some of these criteria. Crap is crap, no matter how long one has toiled at it (recalling some of the school-cruft we've seen). And browsing it and noticing some good lines or pix argues for filching those lines and planting them in a good article, over saving a bad article. Spıke ¬ 19:07 6-Oct-10 Kept ~ 09:18, October 8, 2010 (UTC)

The doom song

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Doom. This was hilarious when I first saw it, nine years ago on Invader Zim, when it was still on TV. What we really needed is someone to copy the joke verbatim. Section 9 violation of HTBFANJS. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:09, October 6, 2010 (UTC) delete. Doesn't even scan correctly. I wouldn't have recognized it if it weren't for the lyrics. --monika 03:24, October 7, 2010 (UTC) doomed and probably a copyright violation if anyone cares. At any rate transcripts of cartoons not funny, I already heard the joke, but it a much better format. --Mn-z 03:28, October 7, 2010 (UTC) Frankly, the NWN doom song was better. A proper article about doom songs in general might be nice, though. But that'd take effort. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101007 - 03:33 (UTC) Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:45, October 7, 2010 (UTC) Don't you just hate it when you get doomed by howling winds? --Wilytank 14:47, October 7, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Songs about Cake

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. I will admit this has something worth saving. The I Will Survive parody could work as a standalone Untunes article. The rest is junk and should go. I was hesitant to make such a drastic change without a second opinion. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:00, October 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Yes, please install Section 4 into UnTunes or UnPoetia and huff the salesy, ungrammatical remainder. Spıke ¬ 20:06 6-Oct-10 Delete. per above. --Mn-z 03:36, October 7, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I wonder if the spoof lyrics have come from somewhere else and are not an original work. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:47, October 7, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. A quick Googling shows other instances of the cake song but they popped up after the revision which added the song to Uncyclopedia and show signs of being cribbed from this page. If it's not the original version it seems to be the oldest online version of the I Will Survive/Cake Song. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:50, October 7, 2010 (UTC)

Carrie Underwood

Score: 3
Keep (6)	Please stop me, but for I opened the page, had my biggest laugh in weeks, and kept on laughing as I scrolled down. God help me. Carrie Underwood. I'm imagining her or her press agent looking at this, can hardly type from laughing. Aleister 15:25 1 10 Ah, now someone has gone and reverted it to kick out the IP stuff, and now it's just another boring article to look at the move on. Not enough to change my vote, but the thrill is gone. Sigh. Aleister 12:54 5 10 Week keep. Per Aleister. Plus I don't see how this topic could ever get any better.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  02 Oct 2010 ~ 02:29 (UTC) Keep. Eh, the idea of it is out-there enough to warrant keeping it, I reckon. At least for now. I might change my mind later, of course, but will it be on vfd then? ...seriously, will it? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101003 - 02:46 (UTC) Keep. brilliant. at least 1000x better than any piece of shit that gets featured. --Roman Dog Bird 00:40, October 5, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Go vote on VFH.--Sycamore (Talk) 08:52, October 6, 2010 (UTC) It's not on VFH. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:28, October 6, 2010 (UTC) That's why you should go there, or find a hobby--Sycamore (Talk) 09:25, October 7, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (9)	Shred An article that somehow tries to tie Carrie Underwood in with Super Mario Brothers, and that's the highlight of the article. It's spiraled into a vandals playground with no redeeming value --—John Lydon 13:22, October 1, 2010 (UTC) Then it's on the Nominator to search the history for a better version, if possible. Spıke ¬ 01:06 3-Oct-10 Ugh. This is horrid. --Wilytank 15:17, October 1, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Besides being incoherent,inconsistent,bad spelling mistakes,homophobic,racist,anti-six foot men,orphanages..it could have been a VFH contender...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:35, October 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Incoherent and juvenile. But enough about Aleister's uncontrollable laughter, let's discuss the article. Spıke ¬ 01:06 3-Oct-10 Smite. I'm really confused at both how anyone could laugh at this and at the article itself...--HM (T) 15:05, October 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete This is just useless. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:40, October 4, 2010 (UTC) Nuke Cringeworthy. --TheSlyFox 04:39, October 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 05:53, October 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Nah. --ChiefjusticePS2 11:38, October 7, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Just to make sure, I read this again Aleister. I think you need to deep pan those mushrooms first before eating them. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:09, October 4, 2010 (UTC) I didn't read it at all. What I laughed about was literally opening the page thinking from the viewpoint of Carrie Underwood, her parents, or her press agent, and sensing the shock they all would have as they schrolled down. No mushrooms involved, although if you have a good batch, (like last time), save me a half-ounce. Carrie Underwood. Even her name is funny as well as funnily erotic. Aleister 12:42 4 10 Then your vote is not an opinion on the article's quality--as a variety of crap pages might have sent her press agent into apoplexy. You might volunteer to spruce it up, or at least work the above pun into the article--Was it Mario who carried her under "wood"? Spıke ¬ 12:52 4-Oct-10 Didn't say I read it, said I looked at it and schrolled down. I actually read brief sentence fragments, which were funny in context too. I don't think anyone would actually read it more than a quick skim, it's so bad now (just go past the recent IP stuff in recent history and an entirely other version pops out) it may be good (there's that long perfect-randomness page I mention once in awhile, but if I tell one of you guys you may put it up for VFD or try to "fix" it, which in that pages case would be tampering with art. If most of the regulars say they won't vote against it, nom it or try to save it, I'll let you in on it. Wink wink, nudge nudge.) Aleister 14:57 4 10 Turd polishing classes start today! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:31, October 5, 2010 (UTC)

UnScripts:Bat Fuck Insane: The MUSICAL!

Score: 8
Keep (0)	weak keep as much as i hate to say it... -- 15:59, October 6, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (8)	Delete. looks like it was removed from illogicopedia for not making enough sense. --Mn-z 00:05, October 6, 2010 (UTC) Someone went off their meds, or does everyone at illogicopedia go off their meds? Serious question, I'm wondering about the site. Aleister 00:15 6 10 Delete. It'd be fine if it was funny. Myocardialinfarction 00:27, October 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Yeah, we really shouldn't encourage more of these things. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:41, October 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I'll put it this way... it's not good. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101006 - 02:56 (UTC) Delete. Junior Uncyclopedia. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:10, October 6, 2010 (UTC) Sad The templates need VFD as well. --—John Lydon 15:42, October 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Though "Bat-fuck insane" is/was the trademark of Rev. Zim ulator, this article is not his. It belongs in a sandbox, but author I.P. Anon doesn't have one. Huff it, huff its templates. Spıke ¬ 19:11 6-Oct-10
Comments	If this is deleted, it has 2 single use templates: {{Thymeany!}} & {{Fourthreich2}} --Mn-z 00:05, October 6, 2010 (UTC)

Ten Inch Player

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Delete. Unless you think disjointed rambling about sitting on a toilet is hilarious you will not like this article. Has a pretty wicked list at the end too. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:04, October 5, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Please, please go away. Maybe put it on 'wanted articles', since there's maybe a joke or two in there, but this is awful. Myocardialinfarction 00:06, October 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. per above. --Mn-z 00:08, October 6, 2010 (UTC) 72 inches under Aleister 00:23 6 10 Destroy. What in hell's toilet is this? --TheSlyFox 04:50, October 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Like most of these articles, it combines abuse and the belief that an average reader will know who this guy was in the first place. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:14, October 6, 2010 (UTC) "It sucks balls." I can't claim familiarity with this rapper, either, but the article is literally toilet humor. Spıke ¬ 19:13 6-Oct-10
Comments

Throwball

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Delete. It looks like a student at University of Regina is using Uncyclopedia, and a little levity, to publish the rules to his fraternity's wacky new game. Don't they know that's what Wikipedia is for? Spıke ¬ 23:46 4-Oct-10 Delete. Well if this game becomes the next basketball then Uncyclopedia can claim to be the first to reject this new sport. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:54, October 5, 2010 (UTC) Delete. vanity. --Mn-z 13:26, October 5, 2010 (UTC) Thunder Slam! As impressive as it is that someone wrote that long of an article about playing volleyball with a deflated ball, I have to vote delete because it's an article about playing volleyball with a deflated ball.--—John Lydon 18:46, October 5, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Bleah. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101005 - 23:39 (UTC) Delete. Oh fuck off. Canadians are normally too polite to spread this kind of shit over a nice site like this. Myocardialinfarction 00:09, October 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Anti-Canadian ramblings about nothing. --TheSlyFox 04:58, October 6, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Search turns up a "Throwball" and a "throwball". If deleted, the photograph of "Rachel" will live on, in the new article on Volleyball. Spıke ¬ 23:46 4-Oct-10

Template:Ultra Jesus

Score: 9
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (9)	Delete. navigational template of randomness. --Mn-z 20:02, October 4, 2010 (UTC) Delete. The only "joke" here is citing Bush and other conspiracy figures. Has virtually nothing to do with Jesus. Only client in mainspace is the very random Etc, where the template provides, well, randomness. Spıke ¬ 20:13 4-Oct-10 Ultra random and Mn-z is doing a great job cleaning out the template vault. Aleister 00:29 5 10 Delete. If Ultra Jesus was a real article I'd keep it, but...--Count of Monkey Crisco 01:40, October 5, 2010 (UTC) Delete. How many of these vanity/useless templates are there in here? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate)06:56, October 5, 2010 (UTC) It's so bad it's scary. EXTERMINATE! --Wilytank 18:26, October 5, 2010 (UTC) Weak Delete Nearly voted keep because the thought of Margaret Thatcher being the Red Ranger cracked me up. Then the booze wore off and I came to my senses. --—John Lydon 18:30, October 5, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Eeeeeh? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101005 - 23:37 (UTC)
Comments

Template:History

Score: 4
Keep (1)	umm... Sure it's sparsely used, but it looks good and has some humor. If we can find some articles to surgically insert this into, we can put it to good use. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 2:38 PM 10/4/10
Delete (5)	Delete. only used on Spongebob Squarepants Vs. Invader Zim, ugly wordy comment template. --Mn-z 16:58, October 4, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Making an assertion about the truthfulness of the following article breaks the "encyclopedia" canon; and going on to nag and insult the reader is amusing to certain juvenile authors but not to the reader. Spıke ¬ 20:23 4-Oct-10 Delete. Ugly and stupid. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:59, October 5, 2010 (UTC) AARGH! TOO...MANY....WORDS....HULK ANGRY!!!! HULK SMASH!!!!!--—John Lydon 18:27, October 5, 2010 (UTC) Delete. What they said, but without the smashing bit. I could throw some beer cans instead, though. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101005 - 23:36 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Virginias

Score: 0
Keep (0)	Keep. Fixed link to East Virginia (Washington, D.C., which is accurate and may be extremely funny to those who live in the Beltway). North Virginia being Maryland is a good joke too, as is West Virginia being the rest of the U.S. west of Virginia. North Carolina is like southern Virginia in attitude and culture. And Virginny is a funny link. So it all seems to fit. Uncy should have a West Virginia page, almost heaven. Aleister 14:50 4 10 Keep. Acceptable. --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:06, October 4, 2010 (UTC) Keep. found an article on Northern Virginia. After some more cleanup, its good enough. --Mn-z 15:34, October 4, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Youse fixed it. Spıke ¬ 15:46 4-Oct-10 Yes.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  05 Oct 2010 ~ 04:40 (UTC)
Delete (0)	# Delete. link rotted. "West Virgina" redirects to United States of America as does "South Virginia" (which links to North Carolina). North and East both link to Maryland. "Virginia" and "Virginny" both link to Virginia. Basically, its a navigational template that doesn't navigate. --Mn-z 13:59, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	I live on the beltway. I didn't find it bad enough to delete (Though there's no reason to vote keep now) but it was definetly not "extremely" funny.--HM (T) 19:45, October 4, 2010 (UTC) You live on the beltway??? Good God man, pack up your things and move off the highway, those trucks aren't fooling around. And maybe mildly funny, or a "ah, that makes sense" funny? Aleister 12:50 5 10 Kept --ChiefjusticePS2 17:15, October 5, 2010 (UTC)

Axis of Evil

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. more listy than the template version {{AoED}} and even weaker link to reality. --Mn-z 17:13, October 4, 2010 (UTC) Obliterate. and be done with it. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 2:43 PM 10/4/10 Delete. Eighty-three things someone declares to be "evil," most with no explanation, some proudly with no explanation. Merely citing a meme does not constitute writing humor. Spıke ¬ 20:16 4-Oct-10 Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 01:38, October 5, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:57, October 5, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Spoon and fork club

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Mostly an old vanity article about two Uncyclopedia users, no actual humor involved. --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:04, October 4, 2010 (UTC) Agreed. But the initial illustration, whose Latin inscription explains the origins of the spork, is now installed in Spork. Spıke ¬ 15:29 4-Oct-10 Delete. vanity. --Mn-z 17:01, October 4, 2010 (UTC) Yes, I bet you're proud of yourselves. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 2:52 PM 10/4/10 Delete. Expunge before the nostalgics come cycling by. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:28, October 5, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Superstates

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Its a navigational template without links! Apparently, the author rigged it up so it will bold the page the reader is currently on. It is theoretically fixable, but it is only used on two pages, and the legitimate navigation templates take up enough room at the bottom of pages as it is. If someone wants to fix this for some reason, I'm willing to change my vote, but I don't think its worth the effort. --Mn-z 16:56, October 4, 2010 (UTC) Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 19:00, October 4, 2010 (UTC) Supersize it Aleister 00:23 5 10 Delete. A vanity trip which follows a spin on the vanity rollercoaster at Vanity Fair. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:57, October 5, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	A graphic of the world as portrayed in Orwell's 1984 with legends, designed to be used only in articles on the 1984 nations. Not generally useful; doesn't need to be a template; but it isn't broken. What might be broken is the idea that immersing one's self in the 1984 dystopia and writing articles on each nation would be funny. Spıke ¬ 20:20 4-Oct-10

Moldavia

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. we have a better article at Moldova, or at least one actually on the subject. --Mn-z 02:51, October 4, 2010 (UTC) Delete.Wacky history the relocates Moldova (or Moldovia) to the Baltic for no discernible comic reason. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:24, October 4, 2010 (UTC) Delete. "crap, I've been spelling it wrong this whole time, hopefully no one will notice..." Spıke ¬ 15:32 4-Oct-10 Delete. A mediocre my-home-is-crap article that turns into a vintage video game guide part way through. --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:42, October 4, 2010 (UTC) --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:42, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Ussr

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. fake {{commonwealth}} template. We used to have about a dozen of these until we realized they sucked. Uses random names for random countries, so it doesn't really work as a navigation template. Its more like a canned joke template. I would have taken it to qvfd, but its on a few too many pages. --Mn-z 22:28, October 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Yes; most of the countries in this template that are real countries are on another template, such as {{Asia}}, where you would look for them; you would not look for them here. "Radiactvie Wasteland" [sic] redirects to South Korea, and so on. Proudly unhelpful to the reader. Spıke ¬ 22:42 3-Oct-10 Delete. It's not even pretty or funny. I'd call random fine if it managed one or the other, though. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101004 - 02:07 (UTC) Delete.Agreeing. Another pointless template. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:19, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. "Countries ruled by Russia (when THEY won the war)" is pretty funny and would be a good template if it just stuck to the factual historical countries.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  05 Oct 2010 ~ 04:39 (UTC)

Template:Periodic table

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. this might be keepable if it where over 10% complete and formatted right. We have a good article on the subject at Idiotic Table of the Elements. --Mn-z 21:48, October 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Yeah... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101003 - 21:58 (UTC) Delete. Per Mn-z; Idiotic Table of the Elements is everything this template wants to be, some day; and if it got that good, and big, you wouldn't want to template it into other articles. Spıke ¬ 22:06 3-Oct-10 Delete. Agree. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:19, October 4, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Idiotic table dominates this. --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:09, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	We also have a page on the Periodic table. --Mn-z 22:25, October 3, 2010 (UTC) Comparatively, this sucks! and the Idiotic Table should move to this name. Spıke ¬ 00:32 4-Oct-10

Category:Canadian royalty

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. single use category. Pointless since Canada doesn't have its own de jure head of state. --Mn-z 21:02, October 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Another category that doesn't categorize--doesn't help the reader--but only lets the author opine that "I think this guy should be the King o' Canada!!!" The only nominee so far is Wayne Gretzky, though he does make a far better statesman than Queen Elizabeth. Spıke ¬ 21:10 3-Oct-10 Delete. Pointless and not even amusing or cute or any such loveliness. Meh. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101003 - 22:17 (UTC) Delete Because everyone knows I am the only Canadian royalty. -- The Zombiebaron 23:58, October 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:20, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Template:UStates

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. big flashy navigational template containing some real states, some fictional states, some real states under stoopid names, and various red links. I could live with a template of Mythical Jurisdictions of the United States, but this is not how to go about doing it. I wouldn't want a template with some but not all real states, as the states listed there would need both navigational templates at the end, which would look ugly and stoopid. --Mn-z 14:25, October 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete. As above; in addition, Typewriter Art is ugly and we can do better. Spıke ¬ 14:59 3-Oct-10 Kill. My eyes hurt. Also, as Mnbzs pointed out, there's a perfectly fine states things already (and by perfectly fine, I mean it's not as useless and doesn't make my eyes hurt.) ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101003 - 16:51 (UTC) Delete.Digital death to redundancy. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:21, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	The component articles (those that exist) already have one strike against them: the author cracks wise with the title. Massachusetts purports to be an encyclopedia article about the state, despite containing complete crap; Pikachusetts is a joke you have to look up by its punch line. It is unlikely that any of these shadow articles is as good, or has such a unique alternate take, that we need two articles on the same state. Spıke ¬ 14:59 3-Oct-10 I searched the template, and the only real parody states are Pikachusetts, Cheeselen (parody of Wisconsin), & MegaTexas. Most of the random names redirect to actual states. As a point of information, I brought Cheeselen to vfd before, and the consensus was to keep and hope someone gets around to merging it into Wisconsin. I also brought MegaTexas to vfd, and it was basically a sympathy keep since the author was still active. --Mn-z 13:41, October 4, 2010 (UTC) Re:Spike the real state template is {{USstates}}. Now with political color coding (and Canadian provinces for some reason). --Mn-z 16:32, October 3, 2010 (UTC) I've added the three "real parody states" to {{USstates}} (new bottom line), in case someone should want to find them. Is someone really eager to re-color this template based on the results of the November elections? Spıke ¬ 13:57 4-Oct-10 I believe a colored the states on the results of the 2004 and 2008 Presidential election if I remember correctly. It does cause the template do lean a bit to the blue side, since Obama's victory margin was higher than Bush's. But, I don't think a Congressional election can really separate the red states from the blue states. --Mn-z 14:20, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

Giusep nay

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	(Nom&vote) I think you have to be on drugs to laugh at this sort of rubbish. Dull as ditchwater. (Also linked from an unfunny quote in Liechtenstein). Myocardialinfarction 11:22, October 2, 2010 (UTC) Delete. randumb about foreigner noone in the Anglo-sphere was ever heard on. --Mn-z 18:51, October 2, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Yeah, uh, no... --Wilytank 00:41, October 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I say Nay, Nay, Nay...thrice Nay. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:46, October 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Wikipedia says he is an ex-member of the Swiss Supreme Court. He probably doesn't merit an Uncyclopedia article. This article, meanwhile, is random drivel about nothing. Spıke ¬ 01:14 3-Oct-10 Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 14:24, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Lettuce/English

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Unless I'm mistaken, English Uncyclopedia doesn't host foreign-language articles. Saberwolf116 05:01, October 2, 2010 (UTC) Cook it. It looks like it already has an English version, just plain Lettuce. Aleister 11:44 2 10 QVFD This is an English Uncyclopedia after all. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 10:29 AM 10/2/10 Delete. single joke article, and that isn't that good either. --Mn-z 18:52, October 2, 2010 (UTC) Delete.There is probably an unfunny in-joke in here somewhere too. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:30, October 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Not having installed this alphabet, the one paragraph I can read looks like a literal spork. If I could see it, and could read and understand it, surely the rest is a spork too. Spıke ¬ 01:10 3-Oct-10 Love, make it go away. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101003 - 02:40 (UTC)
Comments

Chevon

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Isn't this a type of goat meat? --Wilytank 16:15, October 1, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Childish and not funny. Myocardialinfarction 11:26, October 2, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Looks like a translation from something I last saw being flushed away.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:44, October 3, 2010 (UTC) Penis. Anus. Fetus. We get the picture--you're studying Latin. Spıke ¬ 01:08 3-Oct-10 Delete. per above. --Mn-z 01:15, October 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete. ...lovely. Just.... lovely. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101003 - 03:02 (UTC)
Comments

Helicopter Snowman

Score: -4
Keep (5)	Keep. It is not just rambling! It is partly a poke at the image-obsessed Nixon administration (just before Watergate); the absurdity promotes the effect. Stuff that's not based on news but reads so very much like news gets partial credit. Spıke ¬ 17:21 30-Sep-10 ☃ Keep. Funny.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  01 Oct 2010 ~ 01:49 (UTC) For. By Shandon, one of the more interesting and brainy writers to grace these pages. Satire at work. Aleister 10:40 1 10 Keep. Mongo!--Sycamore (Talk) 14:55, October 1, 2010 (UTC) Keep There is no way this should be deleted. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:31, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. This is just rambling. Did someone try to take two unrelated words and assign meaning to them. It's sort of coherent but it's not at all funny or interesting--Count of Monkey Crisco 17:15, September 30, 2010 (UTC).
Comments	Kept --~ 09:53, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

Fluffy

Score: 0
Keep (4)	Strongest strong keep! I've always thought this is one of the funniest items at Uncyclopedia.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  01 Oct 2010 ~ 01:44 (UTC) Keep. Free this page, free it to go back to the wild. I read this on random pages long ago and after waking up from my nightmare found it to be nice and cuddly. Aleister 10:42 1 10 Keep Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 01:13, October 3, 2010 (UTC) I like it. o_O ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101003 - 02:57 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Delete. No, we will not partake in your attempt to make Fluffy the new Chuck Norris. No, we will not elevate this to meme status. No, we do not need another article about how superspecialawesome your made up character is. --Count of Monkey Crisco 16:40, September 30, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Dittoes, Count: Who writes a vanity page on his pet? But (InB4 Aleister) the photo of a scowling baby puppy must be saved. Spıke ¬ 17:14 30-Sep-10 Delete. Before this becomes an injoke per the Count. --Wilytank 15:16, October 1, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Say No to Fluff.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:38, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Pictures has been foster sheltered in category:Dog Images--Count of Monkey Crisco 17:21, September 30, 2010 (UTC) Nice category; contains something extra for the recently saved Lipocram. Spıke ¬ 17:30 30-Sep-10 Kept ~ 09:52, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

The G-2 Pilot pen

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. The G-2 is a really nice ball point pen but, let's face it, it's just a damn pen. That means if you want to write anything more than a stub article you're going to need to pad things out, and did they ever. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:28, September 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Once again, our little friend has an essay due in ten minutes, but has not even picked a subject, much less decided what he wants to say. Then he looks at his pen and.... Spıke ¬ 20:49 29-Sep-10 Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 00:30, October 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Another sad life has passed by this website.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:41, October 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Meandery and random and pointless and short and just not really worth the read... eh. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101003 - 02:48 (UTC)
Comments	The G-2 is a disappointment at the ballpark. Yes, it is a gel pen; but when it starts to drizzle.... Spıke ¬ 20:49 29-Sep-10

Template:Thebog

Score: 0
Keep (5)	Strong keep. Keep. Peter Bogdanovich is a very good director and film historian, although he gives the boringest commentaries I've heard (he reads them off a script, no matter what is going on on the screen.) So he's a real guy. Maybe some editing of the template is in order, better than snuffing it with a pillow. Aleister 1:53 28 9 Save your talent for something that deserves it! This template has only one remaining mainspace client, the delete-worthy Unrelated Quote Guy. We don't need a template that tells you what Bogdanovich thinks--especially as it can't seem to remember. Spıke ¬ 07:57 28-Sep-10 Keep. Eh, it fits where it's used. Or was used last I checked, though evidently it's been removed from a couple or something? But anyhoo, what Al said. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100928 - 15:54 (UTC) Keep Something hopelessly amusing about it. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:15, September 28, 2010 (UTC) Keep Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 01:11, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Delete. I am always against templates that say nothing. I am doubly against this template, used in Cause Of Hitler (below), which announces that it is saying nothing. Spıke ¬ 21:46 27-Sep-10 Delete. I think this is almost an insult template. Its not even a well formatted gaudy colored box. Red text does not look on a gray, especially with small text of all things... Also, I have never heard of this director, and any of his movies. --Mn-z 22:44, September 27, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I was going to add this template here myself, but here it is anyways. ~Formerly Annoying Crap 04:43, 28 September 2010 Delete. Culling useless templates is fine by me. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:40, September 28, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Expendable. Narrow usage. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:19, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	This is now an orphan in mainspace, thanks to our nearby votes. Nothing links to it except a three-year-old Forum. Will the Keeps please reconsider? Spıke ¬ 09:54 29-Sep-10 Does seem pointless keeping and I can't see anyone else using this template in the near future.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:44, September 29, 2010 (UTC) The template now sits happily at the end of this page, and where else could it be perfect? Aleister 20:58 29 9 Kept--~ 09:50, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

After the End of Time

Score: 1
Keep (4)	Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:41, September 26, 2010 (UTC) Keep. This is actually pretty good! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:31, 26 September 2010  Meh. Why not?  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  27 Sep 2010 ~ 03:44 (UTC) Keep. I just came across this on random pages. It must be faith. The real God, who has a home at the end of time, controls all random pages, so who am I to argue. Aleister 10:14 27 9
Delete (5)	Delete. per my theory that timeline should end at present. I can live with it going into the near future, but I think extending beyond infinitely far into the future is going to turn it into a collection of 2005-style random, since its like impossible (and then some). --Mn-z 00:46, September 26, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Time ended. Fun facts are out. Nonsense numbers and technobabble footnotes are in. Spıke ¬ 00:50 26-Sep-10 Delete This is actually pretty bad. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:16, September 26, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Ye Olde Crappe. Dismal execution to boot. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:25, September 26, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Those giant numbers are hilarious. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:03, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Inconclusive. Kept. --~ 17:32, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

End of Time

Score: -2
Keep (6)	Keep. Some bits are amusing--Sycamore (Talk) 10:42, September 26, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Some parts are worth keeping. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:31, 26 September 2010 Keep. It needs a little love and some cleaning up, but is some content within it worth saving.--Sirrah CatshirE Chess the Striker2117 20:36, September 26, 2010 (UTC) Keep. I don't know why you want to delete this, it all comes true.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  27 Sep 2010 ~ 03:41 (UTC) Delete about 60% of it, keep the remainder. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:38, September 27, 2010 (UTC) Keep In the name of Jesus this has been reborn. mAttlobster. (hello) 09:59, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Delete. per my theory that timeline should end at present. I can live with it going into the near future, but I think extending infinitely far into the future is going to turn it into a collection of 2005-style random. --Mn-z 00:43, September 26, 2010 (UTC) And it did. Section 6, "Fun facts," is astounding as it follows three other sections that are nothing but "Fun facts." Article serves no purpose except to convince Anons who can't write that they can contribute to it. Spıke ¬ 00:48 26-Sep-10 Obliterate. Hey, hun. It's the end of time. Let's take off our clothes and make some sweet love babies randumbo and listcruft. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 9:20 PM 9/25/10 #Delete Would vote 'keep' if it was just the obscure letter at the start - but it deteriorates into Norris. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:20, September 26, 2010 (UTC) Delete. This stuff will never be funny. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:27, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	On a related note, I did a rather italic purging of 2000_AD_-_2099_AD, and ended the timeline at Dec 21, 2012. If, however, someone wants to put the effort into creating a non-retarded future timeline, and maintain/police the thing, (i.e. fight randumb creep, removing old entries about what was then the near future that are no longer funny) I have no objections. --Mn-z 01:28, September 26, 2010 (UTC) Kept --ChiefjusticePS2 10:51, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Apestianism

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. A made up religion/wacky war story hybrid with the worst aspects of both. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:53, September 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Apeshit. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:56, September 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I disagree with Romartus, it's actually elephant shit.--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 16:46, September 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Also, the awful history-of-the-future genre. Also, possibly encoded vanity. Spıke ¬ 20:59 29-Sep-10 REAL COOL STORY, BRO!!!!!!1 --Wilytank 15:27, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Xylophone

Score: -5
Keep (7)	Aside from the list (and there may be savable in there, I just scanned it) the text itself is pretty good, and has a focus on the topic. The pic is great! So will have to vote to keep this page on an important instrument essential to any Band Camp. Aleister 14:58 29 9 Keep. Junk the list - the rest can stay. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:57, September 29, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Per above. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:56, 29 September 2010 Keep. (Formerly Delete.) Spıke ¬ 22:50 29-Sep-10 Keep. People are trying. I support them as far as my laziness allows. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100929 - 23:11 (UTC) Keep. See above.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  30 Sep 2010 ~ 01:06 (UTC) Keep It got Spiked. mAttlobster. (hello) 10:04, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Delete. Total listwibble. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:44, September 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. What the fuck?--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 16:25, September 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. The list must go, now. Then what is left? In the intro, the pronunciation sets us up for an author who is better at acting cutesy than amusing; the rest of the first sentence suggests a concept--unfollowed--of an article comprising words starting with X (there aren't many); and the second sentence both assures us that it is one-of-a-kind and discloses a second. The photo doesn't even merit preservation; it's a no-brainer to shoop another one if we ever again fail to think of something really funny. That leaves six paragraphs, and they are, precisely, Randumbo. Spıke ¬ 20:56 29-Sep-10
Comments	Comment. Go ahead, get rid of the list. You'll be left with the "Xylophone Massacre" and disjointed technobable. I don't VFD stuff that only needs a listectomy, I do that on my own. We're talking overall lack of theme, coherence and usable material.--Count of Monkey Crisco 20:58, September 29, 2010 (UTC) Seems unanimous; I've harvested the good stuff from the list and organized it into a new Section 1. Now someone please work on the rest of this dog. Spıke ¬ 22:33 29-Sep-10 PS--Aleister did--by massive deletion (which suits me fine). We're done. Spıke ¬ 00:44 30-Sep-10 Kept. --ChiefjusticePS2 15:50, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

uniju

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Not typically terrible but it has problems. First off, what is Uniju? Looks like it's just some guy, making this a vanity page. There's some sorta-decent jokes about religion but they're not about Uniju. We have plenty of religion jokes here with their own pages and if these are "Uniju's views on religion" this just makes it a section in a vanity page that was never completed. Would the whole thing be a series of editorials about what Uniju thinks about various subjects? Fuck that. --Count of Monkey Crisco 10:24, September 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. uniju=Unijew ? This article is sooo crap.Whatever. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:34, September 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It's terrible. --Wilytank 18:33, September 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. With the Count. It starts off in the familiar territory of babbling about a made-up character, and ends with an overview of comparative religions, something we do much better elsewhere. Spıke ¬ 20:45 29-Sep-10 Terrible As Fuck--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 22:21, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Sea cow

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Udder flotsam from 2005. Themes and pseudo lists pop up at random. --Count of Monkey Crisco 10:11, September 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Cowpat. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:37, September 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. This article's two comedy moments are (1) eating Vietnamese and (2) eating feces. Spıke ¬ 20:43 29-Sep-10 Delete. I sea nothing funny. I made a funny. lol--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 22:22, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Template:NAPA

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Delete. more pointless than average comment templates that references a article currently ICU'd. And no template should ever have that much red space. Ever. --Mn-z 22:05, September 28, 2010 (UTC) Delete. A great new way to inject ugliness, and dumb, rambling humor into any article! Spıke ¬ 23:21 28-Sep-10 WTF? no?  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  29 Sep 2010 ~ 04:10 (UTC) Delete. Ow, my eyes... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100929 - 05:28 (UTC) Delete. Ugly. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:00, September 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Let's face it, that article ain't getting out of ICU alive. --Count of Monkey Crisco 08:39, September 29, 2010 (UTC) *Sobbing* Why do you people have to hate penguins so much? --Wilytank 18:31, September 29, 2010 (UTC) WTF? I love this template to the point I love to see it destroyed--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 22:25, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

The Queer Famine of 1792

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Ugh. Just outright idiocy. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 3:56 PM 9/28/10 Delete. per above. --Mn-z 22:07, September 28, 2010 (UTC) Delete. The article pursues exactly two humor concepts: (1) The idea that talking about queers is inherently funny; (2) the idea that talking about its own uncertainty (breaking the "encyclopedia" canon) is inherently funny. Wrong on both counts. Spıke ¬ 23:00 28-Sep-10 Delete. Fails in all departments, beneath contempt. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:02, September 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 08:37, September 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Gay as fuck--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 16:26, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Template:NSGWP

Score: 3
Keep (1)	Keep. after edits and just because the European laws say this is illegal. When freedom of speech is under attack, I will be there. When European laws point to Fluffy Bunny World I. . ., well, you know the rest. Anyway, what do people think about the rewrite? Aleister 1:55 24 9 An improvement; but too much boldfacing; and too light-hearted; something with a swastika should, at least outwardly, take itself more seriously. Spıke ¬ 02:08 24-Sep-10 more improvement. The boldfacing is because the red background drowns out regular type. And maybe just the opposite, using the swastika to turn the tables and make the group look foolish. Mel Brooks led the way! Aleister 2:17 24 9 I think it made the template worse, if you look at it from how it effects articles its transcluded into rather than as stray mini-article. Although it might be mildly humorous to some, it is now more flashing and attention grabbing, which is bad. That causes the article its in to look gaudy. --Mn-z 03:09, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Delete. pointless comment template, now with more Nazism. (Although to be fair, I really don't mind the Nazism, all comment templates piss me off, but I digress...) --Mn-z 01:03, September 24, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Comment templates piss me off too--but this one actually takes a position on the Holocaust, and a favorable one. Do we need to? Is this funny? What's with the legal disclaimer?! Spıke ¬ 01:15 24-Sep-10 Rescinded Spıke ¬ 02:24 24-Sep-10 I think the disclaimer is a parody of a real legal disclaimer on wikipedia. In some countries, use of a swastika is illegal. --Mn-z 01:23, September 24, 2010 (UTC) Is it fixable as a parody of that European policy? I'll see if I can funny it up. Aleister 1:34 24 9 Note that the disclaimer is bracketed by noinclude and doesn't actually appear where the template is called. Maybe it should; maybe it--and the German laws censoring it--are funnier than the entire original template. Spıke ¬ 02:05 24-Sep-10 Delete. This template tries too hard to be funny. And I can't tell if the disclaimer is supposed to be funny- it looks like a direct copy of the disclaimer on Wikipedia. Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 21:49 Friday, September 24, 2010 Delete. In three of the four mainspace articles that use it (National Front being the exception), the template occurs at the end as an effortless, creativity-less, way to tell the same joke again. Generally, a navigational template is already at the end of the article to provide some eye candy and to show the way to related articles. Spıke ¬ 10:06 26-Sep-10 Delete. Adolf Hitler Junior Youth Uncyclopedia. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:07, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Unrelated Quote Guy

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Intro sets the stage--"an extremely controversial figure credited with saying extremely meaningless and irrelevant things"--sets the stage for the unconstrained rambling that follows, which toward the end digresses into how someone got reverted by Famine. Another article that says nothing about no one. Spıke ¬ 08:02 28-Sep-10 Delete. It's a mess. --Wilytank 15:27, September 28, 2010 (UTC) Delete. "Quotes suck" --Mn-z 22:12, September 28, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Page Bollocks. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:04, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Also Unrelated Quotes Guy, which redirects here. Spıke ¬ 08:12 28-Sep-10

Duckistan

Score: -1
Keep (5)	Keep. There are so many duck pun things that this actually made me chuckle. It might need a bit of a clean up, especially with formatting, but I don't mind it.-- (CUN) 05:45, September 24, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Not quite annoying to tell you the truth. --Wilytank 14:48, September 24, 2010 (UTC) Keep.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  25 Sep 2010 ~ 07:33 (UTC) Keep Silly - but every so slightly good. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:24, September 26, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Even quackers have a right to live.--Sirrah CatshirE Chess the Striker2117 20:49, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Delete. Referenced in The Church of Duck, up for deletion below. The maps, though amateurish, are cute, but their only purpose in life is to support a fantasy country of duck-themed people that simply needs to go away. Spıke ¬ 12:05 23-Sep-10 Delete. Not so ducky. --Count of Monkey Crisco 12:24, September 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. per above. --Mn-z 00:15, September 24, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Canard a-go go-go . --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:51, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Kept --ChiefjusticePS2 07:47, September 28, 2010 (UTC)

Cause Of Hitler

Score: 6
Keep (2)	Keep. I dunno; I find the current version absolutely hilarious. Couldn't stop laughing as I read through... on the other hand, it seems more an Illogicopedia thing. Maybe an expansion of an older version from before it got all strange would make more sense here. At any rate, I do know I don't want to see the thing go. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100927 - 03:18 (UTC) Keep. per Lyrithya --Wilytank 14:51, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (8)	WTF? ~Formerly Annoying Crap 02:20, 27 September 2010 Delete. I am pretty sure the writer hasn't got a clue what he is scribbling about. So why should we bother? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:02, September 27, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Dittoes. This ramble doesn't make me laugh and does make me wonder if the author knows who Hitler was. It's a classic case of a forced essay about nothing. Spıke ¬ 10:15 27-Sep-10 Delete. Didn't like it, even old versions. --Count of Monkey Crisco 10:49, September 27, 2010 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:43, September 27, 2010 (UTC) Delete.--HM (T) 19:48, September 27, 2010 (UTC) Delete. give to illogicopedia or something. --Mn-z 22:46, September 27, 2010 (UTC) Delete No effort, no laughs. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:42, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Versions from 2006-07, while not great, at least have actual sections rather than single-paragraph burps. Poopdeckpercyplop, as the swan song of his four-day life at Uncyclopedia, attached {{VFD}} on 12-Nov-06, apparently without bringing it here; Anon removed the tag three days later. Spıke ¬ 14:26 27-Sep-10

Putain

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Disintegrate. Almost made me fall asleep. Saberwolf116 01:48, September 27, 2010 (UTC) Meh. The wolfy's right; a rather boring thingy. Add to that stubby and lacking humour, meeeh. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100927 - 03:20 (UTC) Delete. Unlike a real putain, this one left me flaccid. —Tonillero (heckle • stalk) 04:35, September 27, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Inconsequential stub. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:04, September 27, 2010 (UTC) Delete. The Change History says that the body of the article was deposited here in 2007 as a favor to a third party; it's unchanged since then except for flourishes and a wobbly digression to Poutine. No one cared enough in three years to add a photo. Humor? there are a couple of puns and I like the spelling of epithette, but it makes me wonder how much is sporked from Wikipedia and whether it's a vehicle for a social message. Spıke ¬ 10:23 27-Sep-10 It's so bad it's scary. Delete. "Putain" is apparently French for Prostitute. --Mn-z 22:49, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Half way between Melbourne and Sydney

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	I can't figure out what this is about. Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 16:25, September 26, 2010 (UTC) Weak delete. What this is about is Canberra, about which there already is a far superior article. Paizuri tried to redirect this to point to that, but was reverted. Don't know if Aussies type "halfway" as two words, but regardless, no one is ever going to type this article's stupid name. No one, either, is ever going to improve this stub. Spıke ¬ 20:50 26-Sep-10 Delete. Template abuse - this one being a particular bad example. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:19, September 26, 2010 (UTC) Delete. per above. I would not say there is template abuse, it has a stub template and sectional template, both of which are valid. However, the sectional one is out of control. --Mn-z 22:27, September 26, 2010 (UTC) Per above. And it's just all short and unfunny and stuff. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100927 - 18:07 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Useless Template

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Delete. useless by its own admission. Its also somewhere between a rude wannabe-rewrite template and a weak insult template. --Mn-z 01:59, September 26, 2010 (UTC) Delete: Or possibly move to userspace because that's the only place it's getting used. -- The Zombiebaron 05:29, September 26, 2010 (UTC) It is rather useless.. but really may as well userspace it. But meantime delete. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100926 - 06:37 (UTC) Delete. Useless. And unused, in mainspace. And rightly so, as a mainspace article should not have a template that talks about templates, except in <!--comments-->. Spıke ¬ 10:10 26-Sep-10 Delete Oh...What...why. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:17, September 26, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Remove before the nostalgics see this! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:21, September 26, 2010 (UTC) ☃ Snowman.. I love it and will miss it when it's gone.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  27 Sep 2010 ~ 03:37 (UTC)
Comments