Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Spector leaves Republican Party: They're not who I am anymore

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

UnNews:Spector leaves Republican Party: They're not who I am anymore (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: UnNews:Spector leaves Republican Party: They're not who I am anymore	Score: 16 pair(s) of spectral spectacles
Nominated by:	Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 16:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
For: 19	nom and for - This is UnNews perfection: to confabulate Senator Arlen Specters' defection from Republican to Democatic parties with Phil Spector, the moron music mogul who murdered a girl he picked up for the night in his Hollywood home, makes the author way smarter tham me. Kudos! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 16:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC) For. Though I don't really agree it's UnNews perfection, it's certainly good enough. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:48, 29 April 2009 (UTC) for what everything zim said, minus the moped thing. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:44, 29 April 2009 (UTC) For. OK, so it's not laugh-out-loud funny, but it is an excellent example of misinformation and just the right side of believable. Print this in a newspaper and people wouldn't doubt its truthfulness. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 07:26, 30 April 2009 (UTC) For --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 11:13, 30 April 2009 (UTC)  For. Topical - big plus for even unnews ! --Romartus 12:16, 30 April 2009 (UTC)  For. To have done the opposite and put Phil Spector in Congress switching his party would have been low, very low, hangin' fruit, meh. To have put Arlen Spector in prison for murder? Implausable! This article is what satire is all about. Hugs! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:30, 30 April 2009 (UTC) For-- You know what the music means... Our time is up. 00:24, 1 May 2009 (UTC) For. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:13, 1 May 2009 (UTC)  For. What's that thing on his head? Sexy Chick Zeitgeist 12:58, 10 May 2009 (UTC) For. For being all clever. —Sir Guildensternenstein 23:50, 11 May 2009 (UTC) For. Thoughtful funny still = funny. --UU - natter 08:42, May 12 For. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:06, 15 May 2009 For It was fun. Staircase CUNt 01:18, 28 May 2009 (UTC) For. MagaMaga 02:26, 30 May 2009 (UTC) For - I like it, and it needs to get off VFH already. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 11:25, May. 30, 2009 For. Weak For, but Weak For is still For. Which is For. Which is good. =) Nameable ((talk?)) 12:54, 30 May 2009 (UTC) For. Per Kip and the fact that I thought I had already voted for this. -OptyC Sucks! CUN13:40, 30 May For. Rack another one up for PP. T. (talk) 01:35, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Against: 3	Against. Mnb'z 17:35, 29 April 2009 (UTC)  Against.. great concept but it didn't make me laugh. sorry :S ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 17:46 29 April 2009 Sorry I just don't like this all this much. Not that it'll make a difference at this point. Don Puttano cHeDDs 14:05,25May,2009
Comments	voting against this article is like shoving a moped up my nostril. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 16:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC) That sounds very tempting. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:17, 29 April 2009 (UTC) I'd rather take a ride up your 'other' fundament, zim. Abstain. --Nachlader-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 21:46, 29 April 2009 (UTC) Abstain. It's an excellent piece of misinformation, more clever than funny (which is OK) but I just can't pull the trigger on a  For. I agree with Rabbi though, it's almost sick to think how many people would be confused by this if it were presented on a respectable news outlet.--    08:32, 30 April 2009 (UTC) I'm gonna abstain too, for the same reasons as Dr. Strange. :/ • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:06, Apr 30 I guess my empty threat didn't help this article any. Ahm well... still... user:DrStrange: it seems to me that the reasons you abstained are the very things that make this a great piece. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 18:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC) N N N N N......I complimented the article and those compliments did not form the basis of the abstain. I'm still divided as to whether I think it's feature material or not.--    18:13, 30 April 2009 (UTC) Also abstain. It's a good UnNews, but the whole thing runs on a single joke. So I didn't really find myself laughing much. pillow talk 19:50, 30 April 2009 (UTC) Then you missed the skillfully placed jab at Michael Steele at the end - his own party considers him a stooge, and there's a good dig at him. Perhaps I should have added a massive pie fight instead. Nah... Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 19:01, 2 May 2009 (UTC) Pie sounds good... • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 03:33, May 14 This article has hung around so long here that there is a chance the senator will be back with the republicans by the time it goes VFH. --Romartus 11:55, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.