Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Boy found at home, alone

Article: UnNews:Boy found at home, alone	Score: 10.5 sequels just as awful as the first
Nominated by:	—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 04:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
For: 18	Nom+For. It's one of the few articles we got left, written by Modusoperandi, and it's not yet featured. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 04:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC) For. I should point out that I haven't seen the film. I assume this is how it ends. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 13:57, 30 March 2009 (UTC) Vaguely comical. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:16, Mar 30 Weak for. It's short, the concept gets a little wobbly, and I don't like the first picture at all. But it still made me laugh. I think it could use work, but I don't have a serious problem featuring it in this state. pillow talk 18:17, 30 March 2009 (UTC) for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:59, 30 March 2009 (UTC) For. We need to appear topical and up-to-date. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 15:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC) Zombiebaron. This was great, classic Modus. Not sure why people are voting against. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC) Modus -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:45, 3 Apr For. I remember this from before my time at Uncyclopedia. Sir Groovester \| Contributions \| Talk Page 07:48, 4 April 2009 (UTC) For. I like it. It could possibly squeeze more comedy juice from the fruit of the concept, but this is refreshing enough as it is. --UU - natter 12:49, Apr 4 For Really liked it ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 00:07, 11 April 2009 (UTC) One of my favourite articles on the whole site. Flashfreez 02:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC) For. When's the movie coming out? -- Meta 500 02:43, 15 April 2009 (UTC) For. *Sir* Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 10:18, Apr. 18, 2009 For As someone named Kevin, I understand the boy's plight completely.-- You know what the music means... Our time is up. 19:15, 23 April 2009 (UTC) For. Nice article. Zeitgeist 15:08, 26 April 2009 (UTC) For. RETARD lol Bbgunbb 18:57, 30 April 2009 (UTC) I'm only voting it because I don't like quasi-featured articles. This is not going to become another EDSAC! \|Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Man on Fire CUN\|IC Kill \| 09:41, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Against: 7.5	weak againt On the grounds that it is more an unbook than unnews in writing style.--Romartus 20:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC) Against. TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 01:31, 31 March 2009 (UTC) Against --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC) Against, the concept was good but I didn't laugh enough for this to be a feature. sorry, Modus :( Although I would like to say to Romartus that "it's not titled right" is bassically a very poor reason for voting against (or abstaining). ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 03:05 15 April 2009 Against. --Docile hippopotamus 09:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Against Per Hyperbole, except more on the Against side. I also didn't read the rest of the votes, so there is quite possibly a comment here that fits my reasoning better. However: meh. -RA HB 08:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC) Yeah, It starts out well enough, but I didn't really like it past that. Not enough laughs from me. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 09:45, 12 May 2009 (UTC) Against. Not feeling it bro. 24.104.86.2 16:41, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Where'd the old nomination page go? This is a quasi-feature, after all. Sir Groovester \| Contributions \| Talk Page 07:48, 4 April 2009 (UTC) I think this was on the "old" VFH, where all noms shared a page. Then Larry from upstairs would come down and hit on the blonde, but Jack would cock-block him. Larry would end up going to the Regal Beagle alone. So, to answer your question, I have no idea. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 16:02, 4 April 2009 (UTC) And my against is just because it doesn't make me pee inside. Sorry. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 02:23, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Abstain. —Sir Guildensternenstein 18:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)