Uncyclopedia:VFH/The Enigmatic Mr. Grumpikins

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

The Enigmatic Mr. Grumpikins (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: The Enigmatic Mr. Grumpikins	Score: 24 Grumpikins
Nominated by:	—rc (t) 04:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
For: 26	For Poo Lit winner and a well-deserved one. It has been tragically robbed of its place on the main page thus far. I aim to rectify this. —rc (t) 04:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC) For, although I can't help but feel that I'm missing the conclusion of the article somehow... Ж Kalir with all the grace of a tin can 04:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC) Go Bassguy 05:15, 9 November 2007 (UTC) For Still my favorite Uncyc article of all time. Brilliance. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 16:17, 9 November 2007 (UTC) For Luckily the article is as good as the title mAttlobster. (hello) 16:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC) For. Very Edward Gorey.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 18:14, 9 November 2007 (UTC) For. Don't much understand it myself. That happens a lot. Dagnabit. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC) For. Ah yes, enigmatic. So. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 22:14, 9 November 2007 (UTC) Aye • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:16, 9 November 2007 (UTC) For --General Insineratehymn 23:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC) For--Dr. Fenwick 23:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC) For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 03:16, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 4 -- Very well-written. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 18:30, Nov 10 Yes. --Algorithm 22:56, 11 November 2007 (UTC) For I think he's a secret agent, but we'll see what happens. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 17:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC) For-Razorflame (contributions) Talk 20:20, 12 November 2007 (UTC) For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 21:41, Nov. 12, 2007 Zombiebaron -- The Zombiebaron 16:17, 16 November 2007 (UTC) For --PET 20:19, 16 November 2007 (UTC) This wasn't featured yet? WTFor. —Hinoa talk.kun 00:23, 17 November 2007 (UTC) For. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 03:54, 17 November 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 11:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC) For, still makes me laugh. I thought this was featured already? -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 11:51, 17 November 2007 (UTC) For. Just awesome! -->:( 00:48, 18 November 2007 (UTC) For A little bit of what Thinker said, but still good enough for feature. -RAHB 01:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC) FOR FOR FOR — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 03:30, 19 November 2007 (UTC) for again - jack mort | cunt | talk - 13:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Against: 2	Weak against. Somewhat enjoyable, as everyone seems to know someone just like Grumpikins IRL, but I still don't find it funny. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:32, 9 November 2007 (UTC) Against -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
Comments	Abstain That was... not very funny.   Le Cejak • <-> 15:39, 10 November 2007 (UTC) Abs. I like it, but its just slightly-too-plain. The pencils incident and the like just doesn't deliver the humor as well as it could. Still a funny article though, and deserving of its PLS win. --THINKER 00:43, 12 November 2007 (UTC) That would suggest that the quality of PLS winners is generally lower than regular features, wouldn't it? -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 11:51, 17 November 2007 (UTC) In 2006, yes. --THINKER 08:33, 19 November 2007 (UTC) Abs Hey are good parts in there but the pictures are drivng me crazy, they seem real plain and there's no color in them. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 13:19, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

---

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.

---