Uncyclopedia:VFH/Paranoid Page

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Paranoid Page (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Paranoid Page	Score: -3.5 aliens coming to abduct you
Nominated by:	– Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 07:49 Aug 03, 2008
For: 12.5	WHO NOMINATED THIS PAGE?! Oh my god! They're watching me! They're everywhere... – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 07:49 Aug 03, 2008  I'm wearing my aluminum underpants today. --CharitwoTalk 08:25, 3 August 2008 (UTC) For. And someone hang up some metal coathangers for me. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 16:08, Aug 3  O_o -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 16:12, 3 August 2008 (UTC)  For. -- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 17:52, 3 August 2008 (UTC) To you naysayers: There's no such thing as an article that is too short. The only articles that are too short or not featureable are the ones that don't exist. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:36, 3 August 2008 (UTC) For Fou-Lu 19:41, 3 August 2008 (UTC)  For. - one of the few that's made me laugh out loud. 19:50, 3 August 2008 (UTC)  For. Just for that half piece of an alien that's following me around. 84.194.239.240 20:12, 3 August 2008 (UTC) For Feature it with "Don't click here! I'm not doing anything wrong!" Or something like that linked in the feature box. -RAHB 20:35, 3 August 2008 (UTC) For the lolz! I find this surprisingly funny. FEETURE NA0 --Trar (talk|contribs|grueslayer) 13:15, 5 August 2008 (UTC) For - We really don't feature enough short pages. Maybe I'll nominate Michael Clarke Duncan again soon. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:12, 5 August 2008 (UTC) Short n' sweet   Le Cejak • <3:44, 06 Aug 2008>
Against: 16	OH MY GOD WHO PUT THIS STUB UP FOR VFH? IT'S A CONSPIRACY I TELL YOU! --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 07:55, 3 August 2008 (UTC) Reluctant against This is hilarious, but realistically not featureable. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 08:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC)  Against.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:46, 3 August 2008 (UTC) Funny but, c'mon, it's shorter than even Euroipods. --mrmonkey72 17:47, 3 August 2008 (UTC) Waaaaaaay too short. --iseditor.user Comments/Criticism 19:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC) No -- The Zombiebaron 00:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC) Nah One of the least funny stubs (excluding the stuff that gets QVFD'd) on the site. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:20, 4 August 2008 (UTC) Against --Moneke 12:02, 5 August 2008 (UTC) No Never again --Nytrospawn 16:40, 5 August 2008 (UTC) No -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:18, 5 Aug against. didn't make me laugh... SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:36, 5 August 2008 (UTC) Against. Not all that funny IMO. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:48, Aug 5  no thank you Its alright... but not amazing... not because its short... but because its just not funny enough --Auk 06:13, 6 August 2008 (UTC) I have nothing against stubs. I do, however, have something against this stub. I didn't laugh. I didn't smile. I just thought to myself, "Oh, here's another attempt to piss off Spang." Sorry, I'm not impressed. sirsysrq @ 17:33 Aug 6 Against. I like the idea that people could take a break from work to come cruise over and read the feature. This would be a very short break. pillow talk 21:49, 7 August 2008 (UTC) Against. MrN 01:46, Aug 8
Comments	Maybe somebody can make the text bigger and add somekind of image, though that would be highly suspicious. 84.194.239.240 18:23, 3 August 2008 (UTC) Well this sucks. I think its BS that this won't get featured because It's too short. Funny is funny if its funny. I personally didn't find it all that funny, but I refuse to vote against, as that would put me in line with the people who don't like short articles because they are short. Ugh. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 16:38, 5 August 2008 (UTC) Hey, I'm not voting against just because it's short. It's just not funny. Mike Gravel is fucking hilarious and should be featured in my opinion. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:24, 5 August 2008 (UTC) I'm not saying it was you. There are a few people above that are saying against just because it is short, which makes no sense to me. This is a "Frustrated with good articles being voted against just because they are short" abstain. I agree with you with this one though, I don't find it that funny. And the Gravel one isn't bad. It might be better if it had a picture of him throwing the rock in the water after the first picture. God I love that video...I really do. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 19:25, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH