From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Padmé
|
Score: 13.5 Skywalkers
|
| Nominated by:
|
Funnybony    19:09, May 29
|
For: 18.5
|
- For. Funnybony 19:32, May 29 19:32, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
 For. —Sir Socky   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:48, 29 May 2011- For. MrN
 02:25, May 31 02:25, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
- For - This is better written than the entire prequel trilogy. -- Kip the Egg
 Talk Works 05:43, May. 31, 2011
- For -- The Zombiebaron 17:12, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Force. It's with this. Imrealized ...hmm? 19:12, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Normally, I'm not a big fan of semi-facty, Wikipedia spoof articles, but this one was exceptionally well done. Kudos to Funnybony and Aleister! --
 Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 22:42 June 1, 2011 (UTC)
- For. This is all Funnybony's, I don't recall doing anything on it. Yay! Natalie Portman. Any page with a pic of her gets my vote, no questions asked! Aleister 1:57 2-6-'11
- For. A Padme butt shot? I think this deserves front page treatment. Dr. Fenwick 06:52, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
- For. 82.169.199.129 09:07, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
- For. More quality Star Wars articles is no bad thing in this world. --Matfen 23:35, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
- For. User:CandidToaster/sig 19:53, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
- For. --
 Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 06:37, 14 June 2011
- Against. 1234 ~
 07:44, 14 June 2011
- For. I laughed
 (talk) 22:56, 25 June 2011
- Fucking For And not just because she's hot.---
  TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 17:31, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Zarbag 20:30, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- For the force smells funny with this one.
 -Maniac1075Complain Here 21:35, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
- For. 83.253.52.90 13:50, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
Against: 5
|
- I'm sorry, but no It was a pretty decent article, but it just didn't seam like feature material to me. – Preceding unsigned comment added by THEDUDEMAN (talk • contribs)
 Against. Not quite worthy --  Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB   07:18, June 14, 2011 (UTC)- Against. Meh. Not grabbing me enough. Pup 10:45 15 Jun '11 22:45, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Against. Sorry, it is a good article, but not for the Front Page thinks I. Just short.
 Mattsnow 06:06, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Mostly per Puppy.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  22:56, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
In Star Wars Luke Skywalker is only good-hearted because of his Mom. HERE is the Pee Review from last year FYI - Initially saved from VFD, this concise article rewrite is no rush job. Also Aleister has a hand in this article too--Funnybony 19:09, May 29
- Don't believe Al, he DID help: he at least dotted a T and crossed an i. Really--Funnybony 16:08, Jun 2
 Abstain.. It's a neat and tidy read but not a feature grabber for me. I liked the idea of Padme being born on a film set in London but it didn't really mesh with the rest of the story enough to push me over to the yes column. Sorry. -- RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:35, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
19:09, May 29
For. 
Against. Not quite worthy --
Abstain.. It's a neat and tidy read but not a feature grabber for me. I liked the idea of Padme being born on a film set in London but it didn't really mesh with the rest of the story enough to push me over to the yes column. Sorry. --
