From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:VFD. |
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Wow. I was shocked. --The Zombiebaron 23:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Kill. -- Sir C
 Holla | CUN 23:49, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Somebody actuall spent time and energy making this. Too bad they forgot thought. Modusoperandi 01:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- ugh. Delete --Electrasol 02:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Teenagerish. Kill. Kokot.kokotisko 10:18, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- I think most of the crap "alien" articles have been ba1337ed/vfd'd now, but I'll keep looking. For now, here's another to flame of whether to delete or delete it. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:52, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- EX-TER-MI-NATE. Holy jumped-up Jesus on a motorized candy cane. Where are you finding this shit, Ghelae? And are you wearing your hip waders? --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:04, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Who the hell wrote this shit? --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 20:16, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Boring VFDing is our honorable duty. Kokot.kokotisko 10:52, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- More VFDing... ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 13:00, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- This thing wouldn't even stand up to Pikachu on amyls. EX-TER-MI-NATE. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:05, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. The only good then ever to come out of Homestar was Strongbad. I fucking hate Homestar. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 03:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Kokot.kokotisko 11:41, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- More VFDing... ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 13:00, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- So that's where that horrible image comes from! EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- WTF? Why isn't this Nerved? This is without a doubt one of the smelliest piles of literary feces I've ever seen. I know.. the whole "article is old" thing, but this is not an article my friends... this is an abomination against God.TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 03:13, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- More cleanup of should-of-been-FFW'd literal Alien Crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 11:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- EX-TER-MI-NATE. He never came back from his supper, so it's safe to say the author was devoured by his creamed corn, and therefore won't mind if we kill this rubbish. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Kill. WTF is this? How has it lived for so long? -- Sir C Holla | CUN 23:24, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Sir Cornbread certainly has a talent for finding crap. Modusoperandi 02:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Indeed he does. Kill this thing. --emc! ╬ 03:05, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- I've just made a discovery on how bad this is. --Sbluen 03:52, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Wow... this is another article which should've been burnt during FFW... much more of these and I might think of Forest Fire Month more seriously... ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 11:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- QVFD. Little more than a glorified list, not worth the time on VFD. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:26, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- This article is ugly and full of hitler and sexual references. --Sbluen 22:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- My favourite part is the picture link that's broken. Awesome! My most favouritest part is not "previewing" first and breaking this very table (apologies to Hinoa4) Modusoperandi 02:45, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- I didn't even need to read it... ugly, future, all of those = KILL IT! ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 11:05, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Well, at least this entry belongs on VFD. And so, without further ado, EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:27, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- One of the many reasons I think it should have been Forest Fire Month - VFD cleanup of literal alien crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- One of the many reasons I think it should have been Forest Fire Month - VFD cleanup of literal alien crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- One of the many reasons I think it should have been Forest Fire Month - VFD cleanup of literal alien crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- One of the many reasons I think it should have been Forest Fire Month - VFD cleanup of literal alien crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- One of the many reasons I think it should have been Forest Fire Month - VFD cleanup of literal alien crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- One of the many reasons I think it should have been Forest Fire Month - VFD cleanup of literal alien crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- One of the many reasons I think it should have been Forest Fire Month - VFD cleanup of literal alien crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- One of the many reasons I think it should have been Forest Fire Month - VFD cleanup of literal alien crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- One of the many reasons I think it should have been Forest Fire Month - VFD cleanup of literal alien crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- One of the many reasons I think it should have been Forest Fire Month - VFD cleanup of literal alien crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Random and unfunny. Lesse here... tap the C-stick... there we go. Smash it out of the arena. (Hammer optional.) User:Hinoa4/sig1M 04:01, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Burn. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 05:15, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- No mention of Jiggly Puff? Outrageous! Modusoperandi 05:35, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Burninate. Kill it! ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Keep, generally has redeeming value. and split off "How to defeat a chav" into its own page to be extended. I would say "The argument" has NRV though. I'd add a mention of Queen Angela, her recent resignation, &c. &c to the first paragraph, and make it more sensible. --Quentin Smith 21:38, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- This thing is ugly, stupid, and just can't be saved. --emc! ╬ 23:45, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- Kill. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 05:10, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- The "How to Defeat a chav" is okay, but the rest of the article deserves to be burnt. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 13:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
I still don't get emo references (nor do I get emo in general. Goth-punk?), but VFD is for awful and this is not it. Modusoperandi 03:45, 30 July 2006 (UTC)- I found certain parts slightly amusing. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 05:09, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- How this ever survived for so long is baffling; kill it please. --emc! ╬ 03:41, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- It looks like a homophobic article, with homo changed to emo. Terrible --Bilky Asko Talk Here 14:48, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- So it's an emophobic article? That could be good, but too short, ugly and crap to be kept. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 13:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- There's not even a joke in here; it's just slander. Besides, only two real articles link to it. It's cute, but I'm sorry to say that it was made by a person when they were beginning and it's quite frankly very low quality. If the Lance Armstrong article got nominated for VFD, then this article is long past due for it's VFD. --emc! ╬ 04:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, since you appear to know things about stuff and whatnot (whereas I am the opposite of that), I'll sit this one out. Modusoperandi 04:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
Under "miracles" it's got, "He once made a penny appear out of little Jimmy's hair." That's friggin' genius. Modusoperandi 00:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- KILL. Has no reason to live. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 22:37, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete for the obvious reason that it sucks. --emc! ╬ 03:42, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- Wait! They spelled squirrel wrong. Dipshits. F*ck 'em. That "He once made a penny appear out of little Jimmy's hair." is still genius, though. I might have to steal it and start a page that doesn't suck. Modusoperandi 04:23, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- Die die die die die. User:Hinoa4/sig1M 04:26, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- Bolded titles? Red links? BURN IT! ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 12:13, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- Just plain terrible Bilky Asko Talk Here 14:51, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- We already have plenty of World War II articles of much higher quality. While the Wii pun has potential, this exercise in horrible writing has no right to exist. EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:03, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Holy bad grammar/spelling and whatnot! Even if it was cleaned up it would still be inferior to World War II. Modusoperandi 19:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Merge the WW1 pun into World War I and Delete. Alksub 20:29, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Seeing that there are probably about 15 different articles on WW2, I mean World War 2, I mean The Second World War...I mean DELETE!!!!
- I almost voted to keep until I realized I was actually reading the World War II article that King in Yellow had linked to. Then I read the actual WWII article. KILL IT. --George VI 06:41, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- Would it be worth merging to a World War II-related page ? MadMax 19:37, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- I agree with Dalek, Modus, Alky, and everyone else. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 12:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- Mostly rips off Wii and the rest is terrible humour. Bilky Asko Talk Here 14:54, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- I just don't get this. Anyone? Anyone? Beuller? Yeah, Delete. User:TD 22:12, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Too... many... red... links... making... eyes... burn... (and if anyone mentions my sig, they are dead). ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 12:11, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- I cannot see any worthwhile humour Bilky Asko Talk Here 14:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Not a gut-buster, mind you, but I can appreciate the anti-trekness, as a ST fan myself. There is a subtle humor here, making fun of how technobabble was often used to save the day in ST:TNG. 'Sides, I've seen smellier piles of literary feces. Though I'm usually extremist with deletions, I do have some heart. Consider my vote the token resistance to a lost cause. User:TD 22:19, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Keep This has potential. For those of you who don't know the reference, that Nexus thingy was a utopian phenomenon. Also, maybe try adding some kind of diffuse cloud and a reference to the time Picard spoke to God. ...Yeah. Alksub 20:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Not very funny. --George VI 04:37, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed. Delete it. -- SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 13:05, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's a random rant. Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 13:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Shoot it with unknown tachyons. -- The Colonel (talk) 15:40, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- EX-TER-MI-NATE. Know that, meatsack. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:05, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- B-U-R-N. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 05:42, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- K-I-L-L. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 12:10, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- E-R-A-S-E. Just too tiny and boring, like a ball bearing Bilky Asko Talk Here 15:00, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- R-E-M-O-V-E from existance. --Sbluen 01:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Hello, I rewrote it just for fun. What do you think now?--Shandon 17:01, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Please note the date folks; this is the most recent thing done to this article.
- I should think the nom has achieved its purpose, and if it is VFD'd again I will vote to keep. --George VI 20:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hi all, what do you think about removing the VFD and Rewritten templates at this time?--Shandon 21:13, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
*I recreated it; don't delete. --emc! ╬ 17:55, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Feature --Spin 22:02, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, don't go as far as to Feature it though. -- SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 23:49, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, and I wouldn't be adverse to featuring. It's a good example of what's wrong with anarchy. —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] 03:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, but I don't know if the subtle (or unintentional) humor would translate well enough for it to be featured. We'd have another Euroipods.
 Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 13:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Heavens No! We can't delete this! I love it. I also love Duel Masters, which nearly got featured, then got huffed, so my Sense of Humor is off-kilter, even for this wiki, but this is so terrible and ludicrous... Keep-age User:TD 22:25, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- DELETEIt's a pathetic vandal bragging...Betamaxx 20:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- If you look at the last line about timmy there is a pretty big pinch of irony, wonder if it really is vandal bragging? --George VI 21:05, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Kill. -- Sir Cornbread The Great [SHOUT] [MUN] ~RAP(+16)!~ [GET IT FEATURED!] 20:59, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Dismantle. We already have SPAM and too many pages about pwning. --Sbluen 22:18, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Big Delete. A) It's a stub. B) It's an "ever-so-slight-snigger" joke than rather than a "big roaring laugh" one, and C) The subpages seem to invite vandalised crap versions of established Uncyc pages for very little in the way of humourous payoff; see Pwnedopedia/Euroipods and Pwnedopedia/AAAAAAAAA!. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 08:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- One piece of scat is more than enough. -- The Colonel (talk) 15:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- EX-TER-MI-NATE. Loud & Stupid =/= funny. If it did, ED would have kicked our butts. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- If anyone knows of a real purpose for this, speak up. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 13:30, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Soak it in water. -- The Colonel (talk) 15:30, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- EX-TER-MI-NATE. What. The. Holy. Dutch. Rat. Fuck. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:04, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- This template kept appearing in God for some reason. For that reason alone Delete
- This deserves to die. And it's nowhere as good as Duel Masters was. Man, do I ever miss Duel Masters. User:TD 22:14, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Crap. Delete
 » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 08:56, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete unless it is improved quickly. Alksub 08:03, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- This can be removed; the article was speedily huffed; by what process I know not.
- Umm, the poopsmith? That little chef guy? I need some help here!
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- And this has to to with... what? --DW III
  22:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- HAH! This article is... I mean... Um... Holy shit, yo. I have no idea why this article exists. This isn't out of left field, it's... it's... I dunno. It's from way further out than left field, though. Kill. Well written, but who gives a rat's ass, yes? User:TD 22:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's vanity. Sporleder is a last name. Apparently the last name of people with crap vanity pages... Modusoperandi 00:14, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Most pages that I nominate for deletion are much worse than this. --Sbluen 04:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed. This one is merely blah. If it stays, perhaps someone will nurture it. Modusoperandi 05:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- This one was one of the first articles I've ever read on uncyc. It's not very good I admit, but like it. Keep it for good old times sake.---Asteroid B612
 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 10:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Meets the funny threshold. Barely, but there it is. --George VI 21:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- I say it's time for a new rule. Any article coining the phrase You are a half-jew whore should recieve an automatic pardon from it's impending VFD entry. That's fuckin' classic. I am going to use that line at work tomorrow, and it's going to be awesome. User:TD 22:21, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Not a single funny thing in this "article". -- Sir Mhaille
 (talk to me) 00:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. I think we need to keep an outlet for our ANGHRY CREATIVE ENERGY. Seriously, though? Let's be like Wikipedia and Delete
- Kill, but only if someone's going to rewrite it soon. -- Sir Cornbread The Great [SHOUT] [MUN] ~RAP(+16)!~ [GET IT FEATURED!] 00:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Let's make a whole new one. --emc! ╬ 00:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. No longer notable enough to have an article.
  t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 02:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's essentially an entire page of cruft, right? This foolishness 'tween Uncyc and ED should stop. It's lame. Modusoperandi 03:16, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. c • > • cunwapquc? 05:12, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Lame---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 10:21, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete but needs to be Rewritten. -- SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 13:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Sucks major buttocks. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 08:50, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- We've had better vandalism... --~ sin($) tan(€) 08:59, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- For original comments view this.
- Is there any version that is good? --Sbluen 01:06, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm currently working on the new article here. Feel free to contribute to it, but please leave the content on the page it's on until the current version of this article is deleted. --emc! ╬ 01:08, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- You know what I think would be really funny? Instead of rewriting it as an attack piece (which is sort of what it is now), we should write a semi-serious article about it as if it were a wiki for theatre actors. There should be a "controversy" section about incidents when people were banned from ED for refusing to pose for their "mandatory goatse photo"... And then we fill it up with lots of photos of people in drag, performing in cabarets and dinner theatres. c • > • cunwapquc? 05:12, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Or make it a redirect to Goa Tse and have done with it. :) -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
|
| Keep |
- I've gone over to delete this more than once, and every time I don't see a reason to...it has promise. Just needs some work. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 20:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's not great, but it's not crap. I'd fix it, but I'm too busy 'shopping pics that nobody likes. Modusoperandi 03:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Nothing but injoky-vanity about actual users of that IRC channel. NOBODY CARES! --DW III 20:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Remove this unpermissible vanity. --Sbluen 01:42, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Oprah + ninja pirate + giant crappy list = delete Modusoperandi 01:48, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete.This article is not at all funny. --Voter Cray Z.
 [MUN] [FUN!!]05:31, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Put it out of its misery. -- Sir Cornbread The Great [SHOUT] [MUN] ~RAP(+13)!~ [GET IT FEATURED!] 06:08, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Nerds deserve attention, too, but not here. -- The Colonel (talk) 14:55, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- I thought Vanity was QVFD worthy. Why waste our taxpayer credits with a trial? --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- I believe we have more than enough votes here to kill it. --emc! ╬ 17:12, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
Moved to Papercuts of Doom (fate to be decided there). --DW III 13:32, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Deleted, no support. --DW III 20:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Deleted, no support. --DW III 20:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Deleted, no support. --DW III 20:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Yikes, how did this survive FFW??? BURNINATE!!! -- Sir Cornbread The Great [SHOUT] [MUN] 18:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Take back to the landfill this article. Splaka should have tagged it with NRV instead of ugly. --Sbluen 21:40, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- NRV. Too short to warrant VFD, not pure-shit enough to qualify for QVFD. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:58, 20 July 2006
- I dont know how this whole voting thing works and if am allowed too, but this 'article' sucks major balls as shouldnt exist--Upascal 07:20, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
(UTC)
|
| Comments |
- This article is more than one month old, which is too old for NRV. I was saying that Splaka should have NRV'd it when it was created. --Sbluen 21:14, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Burn. I made this when I was a n00b, and its really terrible. I dont want this crap to be associated w/ me now that I know how to write a good article. Destroy it. -- Sir Cornbread The Great [SHOUT] [MUN] 02:32, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Kill; you know how to write good articles?! Just kidding. I'm a big fan of your work. --emc! ╬ 02:49, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- If the page's own author wants it gone, who are we to argue? Modusoperandi 02:56, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Exactly. *agrees with Modusoperandi* Burn. -- SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 13:14, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Thanks for being a fan EMC, thats good 2 hear, glad u like my work! Anyway I think most of mine are pretty good, but not this. -- Sir Cornbread The Great [SHOUT] [MUN] 03:19, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- What about the "works of anonymous" thing or whatever (see the bottom of That Guy for an example) in which That One Guy is featured? I'm starting to second guess my vote; perhaps it should just be rewrittent. --emc! ╬ 03:23, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- This can become a good article. I think it just needs to be rewritten. The quotes and the stub are the best parts. --Sbluen 21:37, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think that it someone should rewrite this and I think...screw that. KEEP.--Voter Cray Z. [MUN] [FUN!!]04:33, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- It is a stated opinion that in most opinions this article is unfunny and boring in its opinions on opinion--Bluto 21:32, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- In my humble opinion...ah screw it. This article blows. --emc! ╬ 03:43, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- In my opinion, Can we fix it? No we can't! --POJoe!
 TALKCONTRIBSF@H 13:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
I removed the russian reversal quote but the julius caesar quote is the best one I could think of. If this gets deleted, I would like it to be moved to my userpage. --Sbluen 03:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Then move it before it gets deleted and you have to rewrite it. --POJoe!TALKCONTRIBSF@H 13:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- I was going to rewrite it with some images (it seems to me that an Opinion is sort of like a cross between an Opossum and a Pinion), but I haven't installed photoshop on this computer yet. --Spin 08:07, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- God save Ex nihilo. --emc! ╬ 03:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, because anything you find funny isn't, so therefore everything you don't find funny is. User:Hinoa4/sig1M 03:49, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. It's ok. For some reason it seemed to be crap, then I realized it was good. Just some touch-ups, and it'll be good.--Voter Cray Z. [MUN] [FUN!!]06:33, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
burn its ass down This is a lame-ass unfunny article about Italians pulling nothing out of their asses. Compare it to the excellent and hilarious listing at http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Category:Things_that_George_W._Bush_has_put_up_his_ass --Bluto 20:18, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
I am biassed I am biassed I am biassed! --Bluto 20:20, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
Keep. It's very funny if you, er, get it. American actor Robert Blake, who played one of the killers in In Cold Blood, was in real life accused of killing his wife. As a child actor, he played in the Our Gang comedies under his real name, Mickey Gubitosi or whatever it is. If you have all this background, then you realize that merging "Our Gang" with "Gang of Four" to create "Our Gang of Four" is actually quite funny and clever. If you know none of this background, then the article is mystifying gibberish. As opposed to perfectly understandable gibberish.--Bluto 20:32, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Keep Agreeing with the above; it helps if you know shit about stuff when reading on Uncyclopedia. --emc! ╬ 03:45, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Keep, but someone please de-red-linkify it. I would, but I gotta go jump in the bay. -- Imrealized 00:17, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
I detect no funny here. Kill this mofo. --Hobelhouse 17:43, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Kill It's an in-joke, and is an extreme spork from Vitamins, except without I's. I don't even know for sure why this is still in the Uncyclopedia. It was even said on the Talk Page it should be on VFD. -- SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 12:38, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- It should go away. Modusoperandi 22:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Get rd of t. --Sbluen 22:43, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Stupd. Axe t. -- mrealzed 00:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
It's worth it just for the, "Music is like candy..." quote. Sadly, the rest of the page is mostly crap. Even more sadly, I know so little about this music that the kids are listening to these days that I can't volunteer to do a rewrite. Modusoperandi 04:13, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- KILL. Stupid, cliche, unoriginal (see rap=crap), unfunny, etc. I put it on FFW, but apparently its been here too long. Once its deleted I'll rewrite it and make it funny. Destroy this crap. Sir C Holla | CUN --03:58, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- Get rid of this piece of rap. --Sbluen 04:06, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- R&B at its finest. -- The Colonel (talk) 08:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- I changed my mind. Just make sure to include the "Music is like candy..." quote in the rewrite, Cornbread. Modusoperandi 09:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- Yo, burn this damn article, or somethin... -- SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 11:57, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- Mostly a stupid collection of quotes and links. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:00, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- Pending recreation along less predictable lines, I'm ok with huffing this. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:38, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Cornbread. Instead of killing it, why not ask on its talkpage if anyone minds if you do a rewrite? I doubt that anyone will say, "no", but it's what Tupac would do. Modusoperandi 04:13, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'll be out of town the next 2 days, without a computer, but when I get back I'll rewrite this. For the next two days, please make sure nobody recreates the page with utter crap, because I have a good idea planned. Sir C Holla | CUN --21:18, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- For the record (and no, I have no valid reason) I will not delete this article. Edit it, fix it, modify it, whatever. But it's plenty good enough to stay around. And thus I make a mockery of the democratic process. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 02:58, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- I stumbled onto this when looking for a page on which to put a pic. It's truly awful. Much like his films...so's the pic, it's just not this bad. Modusoperandi 02:22, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Kill. -- SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 13:16, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Send it to the furnace. -- Sir Cornbread The Great [SHOUT] [MUN] [GET THIS FEATURED!] 21:38, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's gonna make a redlink in a section I wrote for Philadelphia, but burn it anyway. I'll just link his name to trite or something. -- Imrealized 00:12, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- After seeing him on the Daily Show tonight, I get the feeling that M. Night might be able to write a funnier article himself. SMASHY! User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 05:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete--Sbluen 05:35, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- The absence of significant humour and the abundance of egregious technical errors are my two main complaints. The image caption is about the only worthwhile thing (because the image itself kind of sucks, too). --George VI 22:10, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- This article hurts my eyes when I look at it; it sucks so bad. --emc! ╬ 03:41, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Very poorly written. --POJoe!TALKCONTRIBSF@H 13:05, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Screw it, if someone wants a Tom Clancy page, they'll have to start from scratch. Modusoperandi 02:22, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- DELETE. -- Sir Cornbread The Great [SHOUT] [MUN] [GET THIS FEATURED!] 21:41, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
It could be good if rewrit, but I know nothing about Tom Clancy. Modusoperandi 02:22, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- This category is incorrectly named. I moved the pages in this category to Category:Ro:. This category should now be deleted. --Sbluen 21:29, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me, even though it should be a QVFD or something. --POJoe!TALKCONTRIBSF@H 13:09, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Worst. Category. Ever. --DW III 15:23, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and remove the category from the pages. It will be easier to do this by using a bot. --Sbluen 21:14, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- No. --George VI 22:13, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Now that it was attempted to be added to Real Ultimate Power, which is my favorite article on the entire wiki, I say the entire thing needs to be smashed. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 02:46, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Uh, compare it to Ex nihilo and tell me which one is funny. And don't be biassed! Only I am allowed to be biassed!--Bluto 20:40, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for fixing it very quickly, DWIII. Bluto must have added hundreds of links. It would take me hours to fix it without using rollback. --Sbluen 21:37, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Gone, and recreation will come with a ban for three days. Carl, can we get Hymie to get rid of the category links? —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 03:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Kill It's ugly and has nothing to do with anything except nothing, so I propose it be killed, now. --emc! ╬ 03:43, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Burn this escaped mental patient. --Sbluen 04:00, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Give it a chance. OK, I lied, kill it. --UNKNOWNFILE 04:04, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Destroy It's short, ugly, and overall just a piece of ca-rap. --emc! ╬ 01:01, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 01:44, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- I don't even a have words to describe the ungoodness of this page. Modusoperandi 02:01, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Headshot this page. Otherwise I will sic Share-Rod DeGropepo on you. --UNKNOWNFILE 04:06, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. This article has more pictures than content, and by more pictures, I mean not even humourous pictures. Burn! -- SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 00:03, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Burninate. --Sbluen 00:31, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Why does this exist? -- Imrealized 05:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Far beyond me...-- SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 16:07, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Just don't delete it in the next few minutes — I've gotta save all those pics so I can photoshop the tails and clothing off. Call it a hobby. Creepy, huh? -- Imrealized 16:04, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, more than creepy. O_O -- SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 16:07, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- It would probably be easier just to go to my webpage. For the most part it's a naked Abe Vigoda fanpage, but I'm trying to branch out into more kinds of creepy filth. Modusoperandi 17:38, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
Factual. Okay, not factual, now it's a direct opposite of the truth. Still not funny. - Sikon 17:16, 11 July 2006 (UTC)- Burninate.
Factual and unfunny. Fine, not factual, but deserves to be burnt more. In fact, it should've been FFW'd. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:39, 11 July 2006 (UTC) ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:17, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Shouldn't this just be put on the barbie? --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, survival of the fittest and all. -- Imrealized 16:06, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- I reverted the factual edits to the old "rewrite" version. It's stubby now, and needs work, but feel free to keep voting on it. Or rewrite it, you lazy POS slackers. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 17:54, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- I say 'keep'. This is a very subtle article, my favourite Kakun article (which says a lot), I love the fact that the link for Graham Coxon is not blurred as he's no long in Blur. Admittedly the image quality could improve a little. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 07:53, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- The image quality could be a bit better, but that's no reason to delete it, I think. Also, the text it effectively unreadable, so there's not much to edit anyway. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 07:53, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm guessing that "blur" is some sort of famous thing that you kids like these days. If making this "blur" all blurry is the joke, then that's the joke that I'm getting. Modusoperandi 08:07, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- Me likey. - Sikon 15:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- There are far worse Kakun-images to torch. I'm for keeping the one good thing he ever did. --Keitei 16:14, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- Needs to be made more obviusly blurred and of better quality as per Spang's comments. But keep anyway, a pretty good concept. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 16:17, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- Stone Roses — Blur — Gorillaz. Hope that clears things up. Oh, and keep. -- Imrealized 18:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- The only gripe I have with this article is that it is horrible quality. Not the article, mind you, the picture that is the article. I can barely read it! Furthermore, the picture can't easily be edited, and kinda ruins the whole wiki spirit, but that doesn't matter. I'll be happy if the image's quality is improved; otherwise,
weak delete. —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] 07:41, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- I really do not understand what is the point of this article if you can't read it. And I don't see what's funny about a blured article. If the image quality is improved it could stay. Shatterstar 14:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- If it was text that was blured, then it might of been keep, but it's a picture so... besides, I FFW'd it, so I'm not likely to go against that. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- I don't care about who did this or who endorsed it. If it is bad, and if no one is going to fix it, then delete it, or simply move the whole thing to someone's userpage/hard drive. -- The Colonel (talk) 16:06, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- It's a Kakun article? Well, that explains the image, ahem, "quality" then. Retracted, but I still want to see that image made better! —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] 07:53, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- {{sofixit}}! ;) • Spang • ☃ • talk • 07:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
WHAT PART OF "RETRACTED" DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND? VOTING OVER SINCE 0800 GMT! QUIT VOTING! User:Hinoa4/sig1M 18:54, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] 06:23, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- not good, but not bad, would be funnier with some of its patent nonsense removed, I agree, chips is worse. -Drdisque 07:01, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- For analogues in higher dimensions [1], see potato soufflé. For that alone, this is a keeper. Could be fixed up real nicelike, I bet. -- Imrealized 20:36, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- 1) Potato chip is not crap 2) VFD is for crap 3) Therefore Potato chip is not here Modusoperandi 20:46, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Good enough for me.--Joe!TALK|CONTRIBS|F@H 22:15, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep...this page is funny...it could probably have some sections rewritten, but, I liked the screaming potato chip. -- SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 22:21, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keeep--Spin 23:02, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - This article is good, for the math (topology) parody. The formula parsing error needs fixing. Would be even better if someone with a math background could further mathify it. --Ogopogo +S (TALK) 03:15, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - This is a good page. A definite keep. TheRappingShoe 12:56, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- PRE-SERVE. Not arf. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:02, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep....clean article, nicely laid out, some funny bits. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 13:09, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- Recently torched by Savethemooses on an arson spree; I wanna 2nd opinion. --DW III 06:12, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- It appears to have PARSE ERROR written in large red letters half the way down. Am I the only fool who sees that? --The Zombiebaron 23:06, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Nope, I see it too. I thought it was part of the joke and I just didn't get it. -- Imrealized 23:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- There's something wrong with the system, that's suppost to be math. Someone ought to report that. --Joe!TALK|CONTRIBS|F@H 23:38, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- I thought it was supposed to be like that too! Of course, whenever I see equations I enter a fugue state and wake up naked at the zoo... Modusoperandi 03:27, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Kept, 11-3. --DW III 13:54, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
|
13:32, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
