Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive233

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.

Chris Cornell College

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Suffers from the same problems as Chris Cornell, which we deleted yesterday. 21:58, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Worse than garden-variety school-cruft for some college that exists, is creating your own college named after a frontman for a band and then making up school-cruft about it. Spıke ¬ 22:05 13-Mar-11 Delete. Didn't laugh. pillow talk 17:48, March 14, 2011 (UTC) GPS - Gay Penis Sex --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 19:57, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Abe

Score: 6
Keep (3)	Keep Isn't doing any harm. Let the Shabber lad have his time to do some magic. And he's got as much right to vote on this as anyone. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:44, March 13, 2011 (UTC) I disagree. This article's "humour" is so bad that it is dangerous. 21:54, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Keep I was wrong. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:20, March 14, 2011 (UTC) I cant believe this was put back on VFD. And before the conversation about it reached anything close to a consensus of any kind. What fuss? What harm? Are you guys serious? --ShabiDOO 00:54, March 15, 2011 (UTC) Don't play dumb. I set out what happened at the start of the Delete section below, and we discussed it, completely and relatively privately, on your talk page. I am dead serious that if you engineer a Keep vote with a promise, and then break the promise, you don't prevail in the vote. Otherwise I can save any article by a throwaway promise to work on it--to quote P.D.Q. Bach, "If I feel like it." And we are all wasting our time here--or more precisely, you are wasting our time here. Spıke ¬ 01:05 15-Mar-11 I am not so attached to any article (especially this one in the state its in now) that I would beg people to keep it on with no intention to work on it. I admire you spike with how quick you work to save an article. But Im not you spike. I had a competition to administer and PLS in the mean time and dont have hours a day to touch stuff. If you want to set some rule right now that things have to be done whenever you say, so be it. I didnt break any promise, I just didnt do stuff as fast as you. Fine, do whatever you guys want with this. --ShabiDOO 01:14, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (9)	Userspace now. Shabidoo induced a Keep vote six weeks ago (I was absent) by promising to work on this page. He hasn't touched it. Coronium queried him about it and got grief and whining about these strict processes. ~~Put it in Shabidoo's space and see if anything ever comes of it.~~ Shabidoo, please, no excuses, no vote. Spıke ¬ 21:29 13-Mar-11 Userfy, although I don't know what merit Shabidoo sees in this mess. 21:38, March 13, 2011 (UTC) I like Dexter's original vote: "Kerkill But send a copy to Shabidoo's userspace to work on improving it." Would have solved this in the first place, and without any fuss as to when to get around to it. 1 2 3 4 ~ 21:41, 13 March 2011 Even though I never volunteered to make this article, it really isn't that good. Sorry. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 21:43, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete., and move the body to Springfield. Aleister Wilkes Booth 23:16 13-3-'11 Christ -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 06:59, March 14, 2011 (UTC) So unfunny it killed my hamster. Not doing any harm, my ass. pillow talk 17:49, March 14, 2011 (UTC) That hamster had been suffering from a long term illness. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:50, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Expunge it from memory. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 19:15, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Userspacify** This should have been deleted long ago. (talk) 00:58, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	There are less than 20 active debates at the moment. Spıke ¬ 21:29 13-Mar-11 Shut up! I'll archive it when I'm good and ready! bursts into tears and runs away 1 2 3 4 ~ 21:41, 13 March 2011 My suggestion is to put it in Shabidoo's userspace. He can work on it there, and move it back it when he's done. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 17:59, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

Sokndal

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Trying to attain its humour from randoms and memes, this conceptual flounderfish fails to amuse nor incite the reader to care. 1 2 3 4 ~ 10:51, 13 March 2011 I don't care how many aliens live in Sokndal. 13:12, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Weak delete - not awful, not worth keeping, unlikely to improve, whatever, fuck it. pillow talk 16:54, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Probably deserves a fix tag more, but it would achieve the same thing so whatever. (talk) 20:18, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	This piece of county-cruft shows Frankol trying to write English and trying to be funny, but he finished his work in Sep'07 and never returned. Not urgently in need of deletion. Spıke ¬ 11:15 13-Mar-11

Ephedra

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. My-favorite-made-up-planet-cruft meets celebrity-cruft and nonsense-chemistry-cruft. -- 08:56, March 13, 2011 (UTC) If it aims to confuse, it performs its task well. 1 2 3 4 ~ 09:11, 13 March 2011 Delete. Make up a place (a planet) and then ramble about it. The tone of randomness is set before you leave the intro. Spıke ¬ 10:57 13-Mar-11 Delete. (talk) 20:22, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Dead monkeys

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Pretty funny page that did okay on VFH. Problem is, it's not ours. I read it years ago - I think I might have even seen it pre-1995, on paper being passed around the classroom. The text of the piece is here: [1] There are thousands of copies on the Internet: [2]. The original author seems to be unknown or anonymous, otherwise I would have deleted it as a copyvio. But in my opinion, we don't need non-original content, even if there aren't copyright concerns. pillow talk 19:22, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Just in case this doesn't get auto-deleted. (talk) 19:24, March 14, 2011 (UTC) I'll third the motion, considering. 1 2 3 4 ~ 19:27, 14 March 2011 If I were still admin, this'd be toast in a second. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 20:09, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Delete. It might be hard to know who copied whom, but in this case, the dates on many of these are 1-Feb-2001, pre-Uncyclopedia. Spıke ¬ 20:15 14-Mar-11
Comments

Search Portal

Score: -4
Keep (5)	Keep. It's fine. --~ 12:48, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Feature! -- 15:41, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Fat chance MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:17, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Keep. I lol'd. 17:32, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Weak keep. Just imitating something isn't exactly the highest form of comedy. But, well, it's competently done and there's no real reason to lose it. pillow talk 17:42, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Ugly, unfunny, underlinked page... I don't understand. 1 2 3 4 ~ 03:09, 14 March 2011
Comments	In Category:Pages that look like the things they're about. Does that explain it? (I don't know.) Spıke ¬ 03:19 14-Mar-11 So... would any of you keep voters care to explain what it even is or why it's funny or what it's for? 1 2 3 4 ~ 17:28, 14 March 2011 It's a spoof of "search portal sites" like [3] which just contain advertising links. 17:32, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Kept: 5 keep votes. pillow talk 17:42, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

High concept

Score: -3
Keep (5)	Keep. A page worthy of the name "page". To answer SPIKE, the concept of satirizing high concept is expressed with exclamation points, random generated title (I've never seen that here and will copy the code), Star Trek - from one point of view - is overdone high concept, etc. It seems well written and intelligent. Maybe not a feature (or maybe a feature!) but why delete something like this? Puzzled! Aleister 3:32 14-3-'11 Aleister -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 06:58, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Aleister. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:42, 14 March 2011 Keep The fact alone that it tries to do something interesting, even if it fails, means that is should be kept. mAttlobster. (hello) 16:33, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Then no page of mine should ever get the axe, because I always have something in mind. Spıke ¬ 16:48 14-Mar-11 I support this reasoning - anything Spiked cannot be touched. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:47, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Keep. It's a mediocre article. I'd probably give it about a 30 on Pee Review. We have features I find less amusing than this. pillow talk 17:52, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Am I just failing to grasp the humour in this, or is there any to grasp? And if that's supposed to be the joke, that's just terrible. 1 2 3 4 ~ 01:38, 14 March 2011 Delete. Why does every section head end with an exclamation point! Why is the title overridden! Why does the tone of the article change abruptly from dry spork to banality! Why is there a See Also! to Star Trek! Why doesn't someone start over! Spıke ¬ 01:43 14-Mar-11
Comments	Kept: 5 keep votes. pillow talk 17:52, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

Game:Zorkmancery (and subpages)

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	What does this even have to do with Zork? - LOL vandalz Absolutely nothing. It's not even playable. --Scofield 12:15, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Horray for deleting pointless rubbish ! 13:48, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Yes. 1 2 3 4 ~ 00:54, 14 March 2011 Yikes. It sort of looks like someone was planning to do some tabletop gaming on the wiki. pillow talk 17:55, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Death slot

Score: -5
Keep (5)	Renamed from "Deathslot™"--Article seems more superficially factual if "death slot" is portrayed as a real thing and not a trademark Spıke ¬ 13:34 13-Mar-11 Rewritten. Good concept--The Death Slot is a time slot where you put a TV program when you want to make its audience go away, to have an excuse to cancel the show. Star Trek was the archetype. A sardonic essay on board-room intrigue would be funnier than this author's goofiness, clichés, memes, and lists. Spıke ¬ 11:09 13-Mar-11 Keep. I agree with SPIKE on this one. Good concept, and a good starting point, but the author needs to get a reality check and stop making stuff up. --Scofield 12:21, March 13, 2011 (UTC) ~~I rewrote the intro, but need help now; don't see where to take this next. Spıke ¬ 12:34 13-Mar-11~~ Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:42, 14 March 2011 Keep. Funny article, keep. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 17:18, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Sweet rewrite. 17:22, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (0)	~~This seems like an idea not apt to go anywhere... and frankly, it's not even all that good an idea. Nor is what's there overly well-implemented. 1 2 3 4 ~ 10:45, 13 March 2011~~ It's better, now. 1 2 3 4 ~ 02:41, 14 March 2011 Weak Delete We probably should have an article under this title, but the current content needs huffing. 13:11, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Can someone tell me what is this page about so I can work on it? And I don't mean only images. --~ 12:37, March 13, 2011 (UTC) This article is about a TV marketing strategy in which a program at the end of it's life is removed permanently from TV broadcasting by putting it into a TV airtime slot which is unavailable to the public. - LOL vandalz Um, if you can't read it, how can you help write it? Spıke ¬ 01:55 14-Mar-11 Can I arbitrarily declare this Kept due to withdrawing the nomination? 1 2 3 4 ~ 02:41, 14 March 2011 Aw, I already asked Coronium to flip. Won't his feelings be hurt if this entire box vanishes first? Spıke ¬ 02:44 14-Mar-11

Excited delirium

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Changed my mind. Keep. When you read his second reference, the page suddenly makes sense, and is actually pretty good satire. "Excited Delirium" is a diagnosis that appears to have been used by some coroners as a euphemism for "Killed by police officer while in custody." So... yeah, I'd say: keep this. pillow talk 17:03, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Never really says what it is. What humour there is seems to be purely sarcastic, although I'm not even certain of that. 1 2 3 4 ~ 09:59, 13 March 2011 Delete. Contradictions in the first sentence. An encyclopedia cliché and a nonsense number in the second sentence. Die. I only scanned the rest, but did notice it ended with two links to external sites, which is probably its sole reason for being. Spıke ¬ 11:04 13-Mar-11 Delete. Horrible. 13:09, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Disgusting. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 21:51, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. First delete the disturbing article, then ban PrublicScutiny for making it. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 22:16, March 13, 2011 (UTC) ~~#Delete. pillow talk 16:55, March 14, 2011 (UTC)~~
Comments	Note: Article was deleted while I was changing my mind. I put it in my userspace; maybe I'll work on it later. pillow talk 18:01, March 14, 2011 (UTC) I see where you are coming from. If the article had only led with that. As it is, no apologies that I couldn't ferret that out from the surrounding wibble. Spıke ¬ 18:18 14-Mar-11

University of Tasmania

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Urgghhhh. 19:17, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. The article should at least purport to tell us something about the place. Spıke ¬ 19:25 12-Mar-11 So, ah... what's funny, exactly? 1 2 3 4 ~ 09:08, 13 March 2011 Terrible. And, unanimous after two days? Let's go ahead and get rid of it. pillow talk 17:56, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Werner Klemperer

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Well punctuated but random nonsense. 18:47, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Does not relate in the least to the actor who portrayed Col. Klink; nor to itself; nor does it have a theme. Spıke ¬ 18:52 12-Mar-11 What... well, er. If this was a house of random and nonsense, it'd fit, but... 1 2 3 4 ~ 09:05, 13 March 2011 What the hell? pillow talk 18:05, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Gar

Score: -1
Keep (5)	Keep. Sentimental reasons, and personal experience. It seems the page is trying to talk about the WTF factor of seeing a gar. I was lucky in that the first fish I ever caught with a hook was a gar, and it was so other-worldly amazing and weirdly beautiful that I unhooked it, threw it back, and never fished again. The gar species is very unique, and I think that's what the author is getting at, just needs more humor. Aleister 14:42 12-3-'11 We wouldn't want to cause you emotional distress. But the above is surely pure B.S. Spıke ¬ 18:01 12-Mar-11 Keep. per Aleister. --~ 15:00, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Keep. per above. --Mn-z 15:03, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Thank you guys. I'll write some stuff in it, maybe throw in an unused pic too. Aleister 16:01 12-3-'11 Keep. Gar is also a low-scoring word in Words with Pirates. (talk) 21:28, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Fine. 1 2 3 4 ~ 09:01, 13 March 2011
Delete (4)	Delete. Short and rubbish, it must die - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 08:46, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Yeah. -- 08:54, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Author can't quite make any point. Spıke ¬ 12:21 12-Mar-11 Delete. A Gar is a fish. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 12:27, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. The article is right that gars are rather unfriendly looking and large fish. I don't find any humor in the article though. --Mn-z 14:40, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete.,--Count of Monkey Crisco 17:43, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Retracted delete vote to give Aleister a chance to rewrite. 16:24, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Calling this one kept. 1 2 3 4 ~ 18:44, 14 March 2011

War is Hell

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Seems more like a badly written essay than something satirical or comedical or whatnot. 1 2 3 4 ~ 09:36, 13 March 2011 EXTERMINATE! Unfunny whinning - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 09:38, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Total fail: Dithering in intro; first person in the text; conclusion is Nobody cares. Spıke ¬ 10:59 13-Mar-11 Obliterate. Awful execution. 13:07, March 13, 2011 (UTC) EXTERMINATE!Bastard. And Pedo. ---I have a talking zombie 14:39, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Chris Cornell

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Obliterate. Randumbo. 19:01, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. The article's only strategy for approaching the frontman of Soundgarden is Randumbo; plus homosexuality, which appears to be based on nothing real. Spıke ¬ 19:23 12-Mar-11 Random bad. In other words, I have nothing useful to add to this. Not that I ever do. 1 2 3 4 ~ 09:07, 13 March 2011 LOL --Roman Dog Bird 09:15, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Whatever --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:20, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Larry Storch

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. manages to be both overwhelmingly stubby and cryptic. 18:56, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Another article from the author of Werner Klemperer where he tries even less successfully to be coherent. Spıke ¬ 19:15 12-Mar-11 Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:03, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Vigilance. 1 2 3 4 ~ 09:06, 13 March 2011
Comments

.communists

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. This occasional work of Bradaphraser is proudly cryptic, a story of a cult no one will discover, as they will never even discover the name of the article. Treats both Communism, cults, and Unix as memes. Spıke ¬ 18:10 12-Mar-11 Delete. The title's great, but the content's terrible. 18:37, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. There's a concept here, but horrible execution. (talk) 21:30, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Vigilance. 1 2 3 4 ~ 09:03, 13 March 2011 Delete. An extended doodle, perhaps park it on the user's page. --*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 09:55, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

New World Order/Membership

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Literally just a list. 16:28, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I hate listcruft. - LOL vandalz Delete. If it isn't a prank category in full-length form! Cut-down anyone by adding them to this list and saying they are in the NWO! If deleted, also delete Section 5 of the parent. Spıke ¬ 17:59 12-Mar-11 Delete. Lists are bad. (talk) 22:26, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:58, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Vigilance. 1 2 3 4 ~ 09:02, 13 March 2011
Comments

World Wide Championship Extreme Wrestling Entertainment Federation

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Obliterate. Stupid title, stupid article. -- 08:38, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Awful fancruft. Spıke ¬ 12:20 12-Mar-11 Delete. namedrop spam. --Mn-z 14:43, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Seems... random? I'm not even sure. 1 2 3 4 ~ 08:58, 13 March 2011
Comments

Alfred Russel Wallace

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Tiny little stub which casts the Victorian scientist as a pioneering member of the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. -- 08:25, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. And that is all it does. Spıke ¬ 11:49 12-Mar-11 Delete. per above. --Mn-z 14:49, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Apparently. 1 2 3 4 ~ 08:55, 13 March 2011
Comments

Serenity

Score: -3
Keep (5)	Extraordinarily strong keep. The rewrite is awesome. -- 08:35, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Keep. I like it. --~ 08:57, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Keep Sly.... mAttlobster. (hello) 09:00, March 12, 2011 (UTC) I like this. Want an article about serenity the film? Then write Serenity (Film). I won't do that, because I've never seen it. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 01:53, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Oh, you should. Science fiction with people in it. And yet, there are things that are easy to ridicule. Spıke ¬ 02:01 13-Mar-11 Keep. Serenity, now. Aleister 13:46 13-3-'11 Keep. Still working on a movie article to go with this. (talk) 21:18, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Delete. Seriously, what the fuck is this? Random, unfunny, 2 terrible pictures, full of red links. We could keep this as a perfect example of how not to write an article. Rescind. (talk) 04:20, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Refers to the article before Fox's "rewrite." Not much better now, as it's still about nothing and not funny. (talk) 05:34, March 12, 2011 (UTC) ~~Either way, meh. 1 2 3 4 ~ 06:57, 12 March 2011~~ If the bloke truly intends to write something, I've no objections. It's not like we can't VFD that, too, if it turns out badly. 1 2 3 4 ~ 08:54, 13 March 2011 If it really does go sour, I'll probably vote to delete it, as well. ~_^ -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg\|His shameless obsession.]] 09:34, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Dittoes to Jack: the rewrite, though better than the original, isn't an article (like that photo of Ataturk lying in state). These are "encyclopedia articles," not cartoons. Spıke ¬ 11:47 12-Mar-11 Rescinded as Fox in Comments expresses interest in working further on the page. Spıke ¬ 23:58 12-Mar-11 Delete. I don't necessarily agree with SPIKE's "we shouldn't have cartoons" stance, but I do think that Serenity should have something to do with Whedon's series and/or movie. That's what the public kind of wants of us. And a picture of a rusty car is worse than a red link in terms of getting that article written. pillow talk 12:02, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. per above. --Mn-z 14:50, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Rewritten! ...Sort of. What do you think? (You're welcome to revert it if you don't like it). -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg\|His shameless obsession.]] 05:21, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Is there a joke here? I don't get it. (talk) 05:24, March 12, 2011 (UTC) I know it has nothing to do with the film... consider what an ironic feeling of serenity might be. A car in the desert: serene, yet hopeless. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg\|His shameless obsession.]] 05:25, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Could be good as part of article on serenity(feeling) but doesn't really stand on its own in my opinion. We'll see what others think. (talk) 05:31, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Hyperbole, if an article on the film is what is expected of us, then I would agree that mine is irrelevant. Would it be better to put what we have here in a separate article on serenity (emotion) like Jack said, then further develop it with some short paragraphs? If that sounds good, we could just move it to my userspace and I'll take it from there. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg\|His shameless obsession.]] 23:53, March 12, 2011 (UTC) I do enjoy your photo--and larger than our usual lead-off photo--just didn't think it was a complete Uncyclopedia article, more properly a good invitation into one. A few good paragraphs solves that problem. In that case, in my opinion, Serenity the emotion should be Serenity and there should be a separate Serenity (movie). Spıke ¬ 23:58 12-Mar-11 I think that if we keep this article as just Serenity it will get vandalized with added content having to do with the film. If we make it clear we also have a page on the movie idiots won't do that (probably.) I'll see what I can do with the film. (talk) 00:14, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Good. We could "make it clear" with a disambiguation at the top of the page. Spıke ¬ 01:49 13-Mar-11 Nice. In that case, I'll be adding some text to go with old Rusty throughout the week. Hope to finish it by then. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg\|His shameless obsession.]] 02:45, March 13, 2011 (UTC) I know it's not much now, but I have written some text and added a {Construction} tag to the page. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg\|His shameless obsession.]] 09:34, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Kept for various reasons, all of which taste funny. 1 2 3 4 ~ 21:47, 13 March 2011

Category:Marree Man

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Keep No point in deleting it. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:51, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Delete. Hype said this category is pointless in a recent edit summary. I tend to agree with him. --Mn-z 03:05, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Yup. Spıke ¬ 03:39 12-Mar-11 Delete. (talk) 03:41, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Yeah... 1 2 3 4 ~ 06:56, 12 March 2011 Delete. Technically, there's no point in hanging my clothes in the closet instead of dumping them in a pile on the floor. It's all about tidiness. pillow talk 12:03, March 12, 2011 (UTC) I dump my clothes in a pile on the floor. If I put them in my closet, the monster fungus would eat them. 1 2 3 4 ~ 08:51, 13 March 2011 In the middle of the floor, so the dust-bunnies will go around them. Spıke ¬ 11:22 13-Mar-11
Comments	RE Hype: Technically there's no point me pretending to be French instead of spontaneously breaking out into star-jumps when I stay in disappointing hotels. It's all about analogies. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:56, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Touché, my good sir. pillow talk 18:56, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

Testiclēs

Score: -4
Keep (6)	Keep. I like it. --~ 08:46, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Not bad - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 08:48, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Copy-edited. Concept is great. You see the word, you think Greek philosopher. There is also a theme, though its origin is contrived: He is the inventor of "solutions in search of a problem." Writing needs work; you must never write about "Testicles' testicles" but work entirely in double meanings. Spıke ¬ 11:56 12-Mar-11 Keep Very readable. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:22, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Keep. per above. --Mn-z 14:45, March 12, 2011 (UTC) It's horrible. 1 2 3 4 ~ 08:58, 13 March 2011
Delete (2)	Delete. Rather puerile article about a philosopher with large testicles. No obvious humour detected. -- 08:34, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Needs to read HTBFANJS. - LOL vandalz
Comments	Renamed from Testicles (Greek Philosopher) Spıke ¬ 00:18 13-Mar-11 Needs a photo. Of a Greek philosopher, guys. Spıke ¬ 12:19 12-Mar 11 What about my photo? --~ 14:57, March 12, 2011 (UTC) I think it is a photo of you in your backyard grabbing your own Testiclēs, and Shooped to attenuate all the colors so you look like a statue. However, it fills the bill; thank you. Spıke ¬ 18:04 12-Mar-11 How did you know it's a picture of myself? --~ 09:22, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Kept. 1 2 3 4 ~ 09:37, 13 March 2011

Yoko Kanno

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Randumbo article about a composer of anime soundtracks. -- 08:31, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Is it really "about" the composer? Spıke ¬ 11:52 12-Mar-11 Well, that's what the author claims on the discussion page. 14:09, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. per above. --Mn-z 14:46, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. (talk) 21:20, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Has a See Also to .communists, which is just as awful. Spıke ¬ 11:52 12-Mar-11

Barista

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Obliterate. Calls this individual a prison rapist, and then follows it up with a lot of one-liners and fake trivia. 17:35, March 11, 2011 (UTC) ?????? What the hell is this supposed to be? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg\|His shameless obsession.]] 18:41, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. It is fancruft on show-wrestler David Batista, achieved by casting him as a member of a race of Baristas and throwing cut-downs at him. Also uses the redirect Deacon Bautista to direct the reader...back here. Spıke ¬ 23:33 11-Mar-11 o_O - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 23:57, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. per above. --Mn-z 01:18, March 12, 2011 (UTC) I'm impressed. That this is still here, that is. 1 2 3 4 ~ 06:55, 12 March 2011
Comments

Lexicon

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. This is some sort of in-joke/private fantasy/musing on the contents of some obscure story which does not contain enough humour to be allowed to survive. And it's taking up space where we could have an article which is actually about lexicons. 16:39, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Ramble about a made-up planet. The intro does everything wrong, from more ramble to an encyclopedia cliché warning the reader that nothing is known. So why would he continue on? Spıke ¬ 23:36 11-Mar-11 Delete. per above. --Mn-z 01:16, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Made-up, eh? Well, that explains it. 1 2 3 4 ~ 06:46, 12 March 2011 Delete As the next voter says, "This is upsetting." mAttlobster. (hello) 12:18, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Not funny. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 16:40, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

:Category:Too damn sexy

Score: 0
Keep (5)	Keep Categories should fundementally not be judged on whether they are useful or not on Uncylcopedia. Who is going to visit here and think to themselves, I only want to look at articles on 'Sexy People'. Wikipedia categories are useful, here they are funny footnotes to the article. 'Too damn sexy' is a more amusing and better category name than 'Sexy People' or 'Hot chicks'. mAttlobster. (hello) 16:45, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Adamantly disagree as always. Articles are to be funny. Categories are to be useful in finding funny pages. Categories congratulating themselves on their own cuteness, that don't help you find funny pages, are to be deleted. Users seeing that someone else did something funny and wanting to put it on their creations like a postage stamp, should instead try writing funny stuff. Spıke ¬ 17:35 11-Mar-11 Keep. Because. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:21, 11 March 2011 Keep. The lobster has it. (talk) 19:27, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Keep. LOL - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 00:02, March 12, 2011 (UTC) I judge by usefulness, funniness, wordage, colour, and tentacles. This has a tentacle. 1 2 3 4 ~ 05:47, 12 March 2011
Delete (5)	Delete. completely redundant with Category:Sexy People & Category:Sexy. It also nearly redundant with Category:Hot chicks, Category:Babes, Category:Hot Babes You Don't Have A Chance With, et cetera. He don't need that many categories that say the same thing, and this one is is probably the least useful of the group. --Mn-z 13:00, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Ditto. Spıke ¬ 13:45 11-Mar-11 Meh. Get rid of it... Just so long as those pictures don't leave with it (though I'm sure they're all on other articles already). _ -- TheSlyFox. Part of the Cleanup Crew. (My History). 18:28, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. per Mnbvcxz. --~ 15:03, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Humour? What Humour? - LOL vandalz
Comments	comment: I also took the liberty of adding all the mainspace content of this article to Category:Sexy People. --Mn-z 14:55, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Kept. pillow talk 18:48, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

:Category:Time Lords

Score: -2
Keep (5)	Keep. Nah. I like it. (talk) 03:38, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Per JoS, I like it too. Just for the name, which sounds good. Time Lords. Aleister 4:24 11-3-'11 And JackOfSpades and I have become Time Lords now. Why?:Take that away from us? Aleister a Time Lord 4:46 11-3-'11 Keep. ITS WIN - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 07:25, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Oh God I've started a trend. (talk) 07:25, March 11, 2011 (UTC) :) - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 03:29, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Keep I love this. Looking forward to Mn-z adding 'Categories created by people with too much time on their hands' to it too. mAttlobster. (hello) Keep. Not entirely redundant; the category's contents actually make sense. pillow talk 12:07, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. filling VFD to capacity per Hype's forum post about too many articles being created. This category is redundant with the less confusing Category:Doctor Who --Mn-z 02:59, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. And all of these are also those. Except Pippi Longstocking. Spıke ¬ 03:01 11-Mar-11 All two of them, to clarify. --Mn-z 03:05, March 11, 2011 (UTC) It's completely pointless and redundant with what it actually is, but I like the... words. They're wordlike. shifty eyes 1 2 3 4 ~ 05:39, 12 March 2011
Comments	RE:Matt lobster: I use Category:Categories created by people with too much time on their hands to keep track of categories I don't like, so I probably won't be nomming it. --Mn-z 18:32, March 11, 2011 (UTC) I meant adding it to 'Time Lords' not 'VFD'. I think 'Categories created by people with too much time on their hands' definitely applies to me. I need to get a hobby other than professional drinking. mAttlobster. (hello) 18:35, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Again just to ask again, did nine people really need to be involved with this? I have to admit I've been very surprised to see the tolerance for Mnbvcxz's category 'quest' among the VFD voters.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:10, March 11, 2011 (UTC) It didn't take nine, except that one of them started a campaign to slap this on user pages after nominator explained the problem and offered a better work-around. Now, I famously interfere with VFD votes by trying to convert bad pages to good, but this effort converts an orphan bad page to a widely referenced bad page, which seems like gaming the vote. Spıke ¬ 03:45 12-Mar-11 Hey, I only added it to my own page. Nothing about people adding this to their own pages had anything to do with me. (talk) 04:11, March 12, 2011 (UTC) Kept. pillow talk 12:07, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

How Did I Get In Arizona?

Score: 5
Keep (2)	Keep. I think it could use a revamp, the beginning is good, but it goes downhill. Some better jokes at the end would help. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 23:44, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Alright I suppose - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 00:00, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (7)	Delete. Looks like someone's really unhappy to be living in Arizona. It's rather pointless and hasn't seen any real attention in a very long time. --TheSlyFox 13:42, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. It sucks. --~ 13:46, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Second of three mainspace articles that are Category:Things Owned By The Grue Master. A short article of lists and unremarkable put-downs of Arizona. Spıke ¬ 13:48 11-Mar-11 Delete. I've seen worse, but I doubt this will ever be finished (original author was only active from August to October 2007), and anything funny in here would be immediately obvious to anyone. --Mn-z 14:55, March 11, 2011 (UTC) And "anything funny in here" could also be moved to Arizona--but I didn't see it. Spıke ¬ 15:28 11-Mar-11 Delete. Wish it could have been HowTo:Get in Arizona. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 16:58, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. (talk) 23:55, March 11, 2011 (UTC) This is an article? 1 2 3 4 ~ 05:48, 12 March 2011
Comments	I'll keep HowTo:Get in Arizona in the back of my mind just in case I get time to write an article, since it sounds like a potential feature. If anyone wants to start it, feel free; I'd love to see it! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg\|His shameless obsession.]] 04:44, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

Game:Life RPG 4 (and subpages)

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Seriously what the fuck is this. -- The Zombiebaron 09:48, March 11, 2011 (UTC) CRAP --Scofield 11:34, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. boring, and it looks like its broken. Even if it were 10 times larger and well written, what's the point? --Mn-z 13:01, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Codes don't work!!!! Let's put this whole mess out of its misery. --TheSlyFox 13:08, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete per slightly above and to the right. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:22, 11 Mar What... 1 2 3 4 ~ 05:45, 12 March 2011
Comments

Game:Life RPG 2 (and subpages)

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. BORING! --Scofield 09:03, March 11, 2011 (UTC) I didn't realize anything could be worse than the first one -- The Zombiebaron 09:41, March 11, 2011 (UTC) How do you play the game!!!?? It seems you have to actually delve into the subpages in order to get to it, since the author couldn't be bothered to put a link on the home page... Other than that, it's unfinished, hasn't been updated in ages, and is total crap to boot. --TheSlyFox 13:04, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. goes nowhere and does not keep the player's attention. --Mn-z 13:06, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete per to the left. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:21, 11 Mar Yes. 1 2 3 4 ~ 05:44, 12 March 2011
Comments

Game:Life RPG (and subpages)

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	The entire franchise is essentially a way of testing your toleration of boredom. --Scofield 09:00, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Just plain bad -- The Zombiebaron 09:40, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. This is a complete waste of time, and not even in a fun way. --TheSlyFox 12:57, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. per above. --Mn-z 13:07, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete per below. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:20, 11 Mar I'm a giant squirrel! 1 2 3 4 ~ 05:43, 12 March 2011
Comments

Template:Spin

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. ugly comment template that does nothing other than potentially start articles off on the wrong foot. (I say potentially, because its probably on articles that suck any, but I digress.) --Mn-z 01:49, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Some articles are indeed "truth-based" rather than silliness. All mainspace Uncyclopedia articles purport to be telling the truth. I absolutely oppose templates that try to tip off the reader as to what type of humor is imminent--it spoils the joke, perhaps so that an editor who doesn't like truth-based humor can stamp someone else's page. Spıke ¬ 01:56 11-Mar-11 Delete Not as good as something better. mAttlobster. (hello) 16:35, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Meh. Not useful, not good, not funny, not pretty, not even... cakish. 1 2 3 4 ~ 05:42, 12 March 2011
Comments

Beef Jerky

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. This was written back when Uncyclopedia was essentially one giant in-joke. pillow talk 23:05, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Delete. A concerted effort to write sentences that won't even let you think about them. Spıke ¬ 23:25 10-Mar-11 Delete. per above. --Mn-z 01:40, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. A mess. Horrible. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 10:32, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Massive injoke overload. 16:31, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 16:57, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Flush**. Down to Illogicopedia it goes. --Scofield 18:35, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Zog Ibbor

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. hits a lot of ramble and random but has very little quality or humor. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:04, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Delete. "The capitol [sic] city of Lusitania and the Holy City of Librarianism" in author's made-up world. Not much work on it since 2005. Spıke ¬ 23:24 10-Mar-11 Delete. (talk) 00:34, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. per above. --Mn-z 01:50, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Crap fantasy stuff. Also linked to an ugly sister of an article Librarianism which repeats much of the same unfunny randumbo. --*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 10:37, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Bed bugs

Score: 8
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (8)	Delete. This article is not very good. (but the Rhymenoceros is very, very good) pillow talk 23:02, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Who Would Win in a Fight, a Grue Or a Bedbug? A subject increasingly in the news, as America continues to Celebrate Diversity, but this article is sheer Randumbo. Spıke ¬ 23:21 10-Mar-11 Was that... was that just a racist implication that minorities have bedbugs? pillow talk 23:30, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Has nothing to do with race. But not every culture is as good as every other at everything, and open-borders America has got a resurgence of bedbugs; also cholera and dengue. Spıke ¬ 23:48 10-Mar-11 Delete. (talk) 00:35, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Bed bugs bites. --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:48, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Shit - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 09:46, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. One of those very typical articles here where the author tries to go surreal but ends up writing unfunny shit and then walks away. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 10:41, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. The part about them not being goats is the only decent part; and even that's a cliche. -- TheSlyFox. Part of the Cleanup Crew. (My History) 17:10, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete.** On the bright side, it gave me another article to VFD. --Scofield 18:39, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Bears vs. Unicorns Conflict

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Delete. A lot of work went into this in 2006: Photoshops, actual planning on the talk page... and... it's ridiculously unfunny. pillow talk 22:59, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I can't bear it. Ha-ha-ha! --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:13, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Pompous and wordy intro. Authors' meticulous planning didn't extend to why the war was fought (apart from flaming bags of poo) and authors don't care, as they have vivid scenes of desperate behavior playing out in their heads that must be set down in print. There was some attempt to relate the characters to real-life persons, such as Tim Hardaway and Dick Cheney, from whom the world has now moved on. Spıke ¬ 23:41 10-Mar-11 Yep (talk) 00:36, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. perhaps illogicopedia would want it. --Mn-z 01:00, March 11, 2011 (UTC) shit - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 09:48, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Extended private joke that really can't be improved except by deleting it. --*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 10:46, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Beaker Lewis John Adams

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. This ill-conceived attempt to mash-up a cricketer with a Muppet ended poorly. pillow talk 22:31, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Weak delete. Honors a real person by saying random things about him. It is better than the usual Randumbo, as the author has good writing skills, marred by nonsense numbers and lots of grammar and spelling errors. Spıke ¬ 22:45 10-Mar-11 Delete. (talk) 00:39, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. per above. And I don't know the guy, so I probably wouldn't even get it if it were done correctly. --Mn-z 01:52, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. An abandoned article, it will be furnaced. --*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 10:52, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

BeOS

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Just not funny.. at all, really. User:Orion Blastar took a stab at improving it but eventually had to admit defeat. Let's lose it. pillow talk 22:25, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Redirect. Several authors have attacked this and been defeated. Only one joke: Everyone hates it. But BeeOS lives on, and we voted to save it last September, with Happytimes doing the restoration work. Spıke ¬ 22:42 10-Mar-11 Delete. "BeOS is a really unlucky operating system originally made for hobbits." (talk) 00:41, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. per above. --Mn-z 01:54, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Eh? 1 2 3 4 ~ 03:16, 11 March 2011
Comments

Slavoj Zizek

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. This stubby little article from 2005 is mostly random. Only one vaguely funny joke. Let it die. 22:14, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Delete. The stubby, photo-less article transforms the Slovenian philosopher into a male model and inventor of The Joke. The Wikipedia article is dry, scholarly, and ripe for serious parody, but probably nobody cares--even about the Wikipedia article. Spıke ¬ 22:20 10-Mar-11 Certainly not worth keeping. pillow talk 22:22, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Per above (talk) 00:42, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Am I the only person who has no idea who this guy is? --Mn-z 01:57, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Certainly not; the same is why I had to go to Wikipedia. Spıke ¬ 02:18 11-Mar-11 Vigilance. 1 2 3 4 ~ 03:15, 11 March 2011
Comments	Fun fact - this guy is one of my heros in life.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:07, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Little Brucie

Score: 8
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (8)	I don't know what this is, but I do know what it isn't. pillow talk 19:46, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Vanity, cyber-bullying, or otherwise written for the private amusement of one or maybe two people. Spıke ¬ 21:03 10-Mar-11 Obliterate. Silly nonsense. 22:09, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Oh, how cute! Someone thinks people care. 1 2 3 4 ~ 22:10, 10 March 2011 Sigh (talk) 00:42, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. it could be randumbo, but I'm guessing vano-cyber bulling. --Mn-z 01:59, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Burninate Since at the end, we still don't know who "Brucie" is, it appears to be some sort of vanity page. -- TheSlyFox. Part of the Cleanup Crew. (My History). 18:32, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 21:18, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Beanie Baby

Score: -2
Keep (4)	Agree with Spike. It just needs some love. (talk) 00:38, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Keep. In fact, I agree with myself. Spıke ¬ 01:03 11-Mar-11 Rewrote intro, added photo by Mimo&Maxus, copy-edited Section 1. Spıke ¬ 14:07 11-Mar-11 Keep. Can be fixed. --Scofield 09:18, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Keep. --~ 15:30, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)	~~# Delete. This article consists 50% of true things that aren't funny, and 50% of made-up things that aren't funny. pillow talk 22:52, March 10, 2011 (UTC)~~Rewritten. Delete There is no sense in keeping this carp. mAttlobster. (hello) 16:53, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	This is a truly bad piece of writing, with its nonsense year numbers, nefarious concept of people being abducted and turned into Beanie Babies, red-links, and final listcruft. It has no humor concept, not even the rush to buy stuffed dolls and complete a collection heedless of the possibility that they will not always command top dollar (a thought that has numerous current real-world tie-ins). But Beanie Babies were the U.S.'s dominant fad at one point, and this page is slightly better than a red-link. Spıke ¬ 23:46 10-Mar-11 Kept. (Rewritten:Nomination withdrawn). pillow talk 17:03, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Game:XCube Live (and subpages)

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Obviously someone spent some of their time making this. What I can't figure out is why. -- The Zombiebaron 07:42, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Bleh - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 07:43, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Yes. 1 2 3 4 ~ 08:03, 10 March 2011 Delete. Sadness encapsulated. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 09:49, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Delete. The one game that happens to exist in this space is so badly crafted that none of it is worth keeping. --TheSlyFox 19:33, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Delete. gamespace is probably the biggest waste of effort we have on this wiki. --Mn-z 02:00, March 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete.** Very promising idea. Unfortunately, the fact that nobody cares about it anymore makes it underdeveloped and pointless. --Scofield 08:52, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Does anyone else think we should delete that Life RPG while we're at it? --TheSlyFox 19:37, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Yes, but you should probably make a separate nomination for it. And another one for the sequel. -- The Zombiebaron 22:32, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

Game:Planetfall (and subpages)

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	This game describes itself as being an incomplete half-rate parody of Planetfall. Seeing as how the original author hasn't edited it since 2007, I think we can safely assume it will never be completed. -- The Zombiebaron 05:46, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Nothing supports it's cause - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 06:05, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Yes. 1 2 3 4 ~ 08:03, 10 March 2011 Delete.--*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 09:52, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Delete.** (talk) 00:45, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Game:OCDGame (and subpages)

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Shitty shit shit -- The Zombiebaron 05:16, March 10, 2011 (UTC) That's not even OCD. (talk) 05:18, March 10, 2011 (UTC) It could have kept me amused if it was just a switch. But then there was a grue. Kill it, I say. Kill it! 1 2 3 4 ~ 05:24, 10 March 2011 Delete. it produced fail so immense that words cannot describe it. - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 06:08, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 09:52, March 10, 2011 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! This doesn't even have the basic concept of OCD down: such a person would be too worried about breaking the switch (or causing the universe to implode) to keep hitting it over and over. This is more like a play on that old T-shirt joke that goes "How to keep an idiot busy." Besides that, it's just another undeveloped, unfunny Zork clone. Burninate it!** --TheSlyFox 19:29, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Game:Multiplayer TicTacToe

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	I'm too lazy to go look up the reason why Game:Multiplayer Chess was deleted on VFD last March, but I'm pretty sure my reasons for nominating this are similar. Basically, if people want to play tic-tac-toe against each other on Uncyclopedia there are much better ways to do that then on this totally inactive game page. -- The Zombiebaron 04:57, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Indeed. We have userspace and talkpages and forums and whatnot for... that stuff. 1 2 3 4 ~ 05:10, 10 March 2011 Delete. (talk) 05:13, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Waste of space - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 06:10, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Delete.--*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 09:54, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Delete.**. This should have been in Forum space. pillow talk 21:44, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Category:US elected state-level executives who have not been human

Score: 10
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (10)	Delete. a rarely used insult category, and not a very good one at that. --Mn-z 03:04, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Delete. In the rare case that U.S. state leaders are even relevant, readers will need explanations not insults. And Huckabee (one of the three in this category) is hardly of interest to us as an ex-governor, and Katherine Harris has jumped the shark entirely. Spıke ¬ 03:20 10-Mar-11 ???????????????????? --Roman Dog Bird 03:27, March 10, 2011 (UTC) !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --Aleister 4:14 10-3-'11 Bam (talk) 05:10, March 10, 2011 (UTC) That doesn't even make sense. 1 2 3 4 ~ 05:11, 10 March 2011 O_o WTF? - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 06:12, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Timmay!!!!!!!! --TheSlyFox 19:18, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Delete Oh dear mAttlobster. (hello) 21:06, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Pretty lame joke category. 22:07, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

School Vandalism

Score: -1
Keep (4)	Keep. Anon shopped this deletion to me too, and I refused to be his proxy. Again, "this one, in the Category:Pages that look like the things they're about, does well what it tries to do." Spıke ¬ 19:07 9-Mar-11 Keep. It is fine. The work on the coding things is really good. I think no one's getting the joke. --~ 19:59, March 9, 2011 (UTC) It has a joke? 1 2 3 4 ~ 20:10, 9 March 2011 You know... the whole "vandalism" thing... how is that called? --~ 20:13, March 9, 2011 (UTC) What? Huh? 1 2 3 4 ~ 20:30, 9 March 2011 For vandalism, this is extremely well done. (talk) 02:51, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	This is going to be deleted anyway, let's just get this out the way. (´；ω；`) - LOL vandalz Delete, because the creator wants it to be deleted. 18:37, March 9, 2011 (UTC) Pretty magnanimous of you to nominate your article for VFD when multiple regulars refused. But, the IP is right: this doesn't belong in mainspace. Let's move it over to your userspace where it goes. Sorry. pillow talk 18:47, March 9, 2011 (UTC) Weak Delete. This looks like it might become decent with a complete overhaul, but I doubt anyone's going to do that. This is too nonsensically random and obscure even for me to handle. --TheSlyFox 19:13, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I know this is my article, I am nominating this for 77.107.26.103. - LOL vandalz I don't want this to be deleted, I'm nominating this for an IP. LOL vandalz This was originally Userspace, but Mimo&Maxus moved it with Pseudo-permission. - LOL vandalz Thanks, SPIKE （・∀・） - LOL vandalz This discussion is hurting my brain. 21:45, March 9, 2011 (UTC) Coronium, it's about to hurt more: Another n00b, I was the inventor of the renowned Nom and abstain genre, taking several pages here I wasn't sure should be deleted, in order to get other people's opinions. I was sternly informed by Mordillo that one doesn't bring stuff here as mere conversation pieces. If you can write, "I don't want this to be deleted," above, then you have a duty (unlike Massachusetts state reps, who are required to file crap bills for their constituents), to tell Anon to Go Fish, which is what I told him. Spıke ¬ 18:45 10-Mar-11 I'm glad you did that. - LOL vandalz Kept. -- The Zombiebaron 06:23, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Cleveland, Ohio

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. The only thing I found funny in this article was the YouTube video under popular culture. 18:25, March 9, 2011 (UTC) Delete. It's a shame author didn't put this ridiculous city on display. The paragraph that begins "1983" is a hint of how you would do so. Author instead tells us it "is a piece of feces...which lies at the Rust Belt on the planet Cardigan." Yawn. Spıke ¬ 19:12 9-Mar-11 I'd say it's as good as nonsense, except it's... well, not. I've read some damn fine nonsense, in fact. This ain't. 1 2 3 4 ~ 20:20, 9 March 2011 Delete. This has always just been a series of IPs doing drive-bys and adding bits and pieces of nonsense. No one has ever tried to write an article about Cleveland. pillow talk 21:47, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Fecesbook

Score: 0
Keep (3)	Honestly, I don't hate it that much. pillow talk 22:23, March 7, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Not too bad...--Sycamore (Talk) 22:46, March 8, 2011 (UTC) Keep go eat shit fuckers MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 10:41, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	DESTROY Stupid and shit, show no mercy - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 02:09, March 7, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Intro with emoticon gives away that the subject is nonsense. The main text divides into two parts: Humor based on feces, which fails (juvenile), and humor not based on feces, such as generic humor on texting, which fails (inscrutable). Oh, and finally, anti-government paranoia, which fails (also inscrutable). Spıke ¬ 02:16 7-Mar-11 Guuh. 1 2 3 4 ~ 08:57, 7 March 2011
Comments	Query: If you are near the monkey house at a zoo, and see that cautionary sign about monkeys throwing feces, what are you supposed to do in response? get the first volley in? Spıke ¬ 02:16 7-Mar-11 When I've ever been to a Zoo, I mostly avoid feces - as for the monkeys, I just like watching them have sex...--Sycamore (Talk) 19:20, March 9, 2011 (UTC) Kept. -- The Zombiebaron 17:53, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

Battle for Disneyland

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Crazy random. 1 2 3 4 ~ 04:25, 9 March 2011 Delete. The intro (1930-31) suggested it might be allegory about Walt Disney or the Walt Disney Company. The first paragraph of the text (1197!) killed that. The article is undeveloped--and if it is developed, it will merely be another Wacky War without a real-world point. Spıke ¬ 12:39 9-Mar-11 Delete. Yeah. 18:19, March 9, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 22:52, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Dramamine Pathway

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	That's not funny. At all. And it's short. And unloved. I bet nobody would even notice if it just... disappeared... But I'm bringing it here to make it look like I follow policy. 1 2 3 4 ~ 04:09, 9 March 2011 Delete. and use its meat in a pie. (talk) 04:18, March 9, 2011 (UTC) Seems to be a joke about Dramamine. Unfortunately, I have no idea what that is. --Scofield 10:48, March 9, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Per my comment below. I've salvaged everything good about this article, plus additional information misread from Wikipedia, into a replacement article Dramamine.Spıke ¬ 13:20 9-Mar-11
Comments	It's a complete article, with a nice shoop, on a supposed part of the brain that induces numb thinking. But it veers between its trite concept of documenting some of the stupid things that people do, and encyclopedia clichés like "It is thought to work mostly by....have frequently been quoted to say things suchs as....Much further research must be done." Could be saved, but no real reason to. It would be a plus if the article name had something to do with commercials, but I don't remember it, nor does Google. Deleting it will stick yet another red-link into Dramamine. Spıke ¬ 12:55 9-Mar-11 Ignore that last. Dramamine was found by Google on `mirror.uncyc` but was deleted from mainspace (many times). Spıke ¬ 12:58 9-Mar-11

Unsolved problems in linguistics

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Hardly even a stub, doesn't do terribly much, just isn't funny.1 2 3 4 ~ 03:16, 9 March 2011 Delete. Deconstructs the idiom "tongue-twisters." Then destructs. Spıke ¬ 03:24 9-Mar-11 Wow (talk) 04:19, March 9, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Nothing very funny here. 21:46, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Heartening to know that few unsolved problems remain in linguistics. (Or at least funny ones.) Spıke ¬ 19:19 9-Mar-11

Reasons why people create articles with horribly long titles for no apparent reason, hoping somebody will randomly stumble upon it and remark on the length of the title, but then forget about it in five minutes later because their gay granny had a seizure

Score: -4
Keep (8)	Wait, I remember why, it's because it's actually amusing, and it has been vandalized. A lot. I'll try to find a suitable past revision. Though upon closer inspection, the only one who had vandalized it is "Sockpuppet of an Unregistered User." What shall we do about that one???? -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 00:43, March 9, 2011 (UTC) Feel free to remove any changes I made, TKF. I think I was smoking some substance with a hellishly long chemical name at the time. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:58, 9 March 2011 Keep. I love this. -- 02:38, March 9, 2011 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:58, 9 March 2011 Keep. Better off just trying to fix this one, its got some fail jokes and some ugly parts, but really only needs fixing up - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 07:20, March 9, 2011 (UTC) Keep. What Frosty the Snowman wants, Frosty the Snowman gets. (I just had to write that sentence once in my lifetime). Aleister 12:48 9-3-'11 Keep. "It's not that long" ~ Some Guy on Reasons Why People Create Articles With Horribly Long Titles For No Apparent Reason, Hoping Somebody Will Randomly Stumble Upon It And Remark On The Length Of The Title, But Then Forgets About It In Five Minutes Later Because Their Gay Granny Had A Seizure, which is an article thats not really that long on closer inspection, but could be longer if it used words of a nature that don't really make any sense to the article in question and just start to make a sort of random speech and somehow carry on the speech without needing a period, full stop, question mark, exclamation point, or any other kind of sentence stopping device, but will inevitable need one as the speech will just keep going on and on and on and on for eternity, ad infinitum, forever, infinitively, until they die, until the speaker's voice disappears, until everybody or almost everybody leaves and thus do not care, which is what some senators try to do to prevent a bill from becoming a law, which is called filibusting... and you know what I mean... oh wait do those count as periods? < that does!! PERIOD FULL STOP... ETC... - LOL vandalz Keep It was vandalized. Per the VFD rules, Hype would be banned for a week if he were an ordinary user, but he's a temporary op so the rules won't be enforced. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:29, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Keep. someone finally got around to shortening so that it no longer breaks the internet. Also, bandwagoning. --Mn-z 02:59, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	This fucking thing takes up nearly half a megabyte and is almost entirely horizontal. It is also not funny. When I tried to add the VFD tag, it crashed my browser. pillow talk 22:14, March 8, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Amused the author; does not amuse the reader. Deliberately long sentences, section heads, and so on, is deliberately bad writing, and this article brags about it and dares the reader to take it to VFD. Spıke ¬ 22:30 8-Mar-11 Delete. (talk) 22:33, March 8, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Almost crashed by browser when I tried to read it. --Mn-z 23:59, March 8, 2011 (UTC) ~~This has been kept several times. I think I voted keep on it on one or two of them. I don't really remember why. It's been vandalized? In any case, I no longer care for it.~~ -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 00:43, March 9, 2011 (UTC) I looked at an old version. Wasn't so ugly, but it still wasn't funny. 1 2 3 4 ~ 03:10, 9 March 2011
Comments	I was able to add the {{VFD}} tag for you. Spıke ¬ 22:43 8-Mar-11 You must be less browser-impaired than I. I use Internet Explorer, mostly to annoy Lyrithya. pillow talk 22:45, March 8, 2011 (UTC) You know what an excellent web browser for dealing with huge crap is? Konqueror. You should try it sometime. Excellent web browser, except for the fact that the css it supports seems to be chosen completely at random. 1 2 3 4 ~ 20:41, 9 March 2011 Kept. -- The Zombiebaron 05:18, March 10, 2011 (UTC)