Uncyclopedia:VFH/Uncyclopedia:An Appeal From Uncyclopedia Mother, Codeine's Mum

Score: 3 annoying sitenotices

Nominated by:

Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate

17:10, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

For: 11

This user is a total UKer,
...jolly good, what what?!
(British Uncyclopedians)

uk
N

This user is a native speaker of Correct English.

This user is a sinner, and bows before Satan.

This user is a member of the Evil Atheist Conspiracy.

"We're after your children and pets."

This user is a crazed Beatles fan. (is there any other kind??)

This user is an authoritarian
and proudly licks the boots of the system.

This user supports the Union of European Soviet Republics.
(Otherwise known as the EC)

This user is a Communist
& is working on their Lenin mustache! ☭

IC

This user is a member of Imperial Colonization.

--Aladdin Sane 17:20, May 18, 2011 (UTC) 4 January, 2009 7:21 (UTC)

Nom and For. This sitenotice is absolute win, and plus it brings back Codeine's mum. In regards to the article itself, it is well-written, funny, and the Rouge the Bat photo makes no sense at all....genius! - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 17:10, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Feature! - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 17:24, Jan 1
For --Mnbvcxz 17:54, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
For. IronLung 18:56, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Yup. Direct Wikipedia parodies generally == awesome when well done. This is no exception. –—Hv (talk) 1/01 23:00
A Definite For. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:50, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Aye. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 20:23, Jan 2
For -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 03:39, Jan. 3, 2009
For:-- 20:45, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
For I got to suggest the citation needed, which makes me happy.--<<>> 02:01, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
For. I feel like it's me own mum ~ 10:17, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Against: 8

Knee-jerk against per my policy of "we really shouldn't feature articles that reference Uncyclopedia." pillow talk 09:34, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Against Cool to have here, but really doesn't get me laughing very much. -RA HB 12:18, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Against. TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 21:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Against, but only because it's already a site notice, which is obviously the best place for it. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 10:58, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
against as per rahb. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
C'mon, gize. This was funny, but was it really that funny? It's a sitenotice parody, something that just needs to stay where it is. I like it, I just don't think featuring it is a good idea. —Sir SysRq (talk) 23:08, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Against. Per Sys. --UU - natter 11:59, Jan 6
Against in hindsight, what they said. I think we have a little too many "preachy" articles in the queue right now. And, I don't want it to go from site notice to feature.--Mnbvcxz 15:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Comment - I politely disagree that some self reference on VFH should be out - however with the site notice this article will be linked to the top of the screens and on the frontpage. It might be a joke taken a bit far. It is very funny despite this though. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 12:24, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
I've been struggling with how to vote on this one. On one hand I don't know if it's the funniest thing ever, but on the other hand it is one of the best pure parodies we have right now, and that does make me smile. Is it only funny because it parodies Wikipedia, and if so, is it a bad thing? I'll just say I have no idea what in the hell I'm talking about, and abstain. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 15:41, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

VFH

The nomination was not successful. rm 25% +3 ~

This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 11:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.

Uncyclopedia:An Appeal From Uncyclopedia Mother, Codeine's Mum (history, logs) (feature) (remove)