Uncyclopedia:VFH/Naruto

Article: Naruto	Score: 14.5 questionable techniques
Nominated by:	Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 01:34, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
For: 18.5	N+F Rewrite of terrible, horrible, no-good, very bad article + good pee review (the second one, first one doesn't count) + praise on talk page = winner. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 01:34, 10 September 2007 (UTC) I read, I laughed, I voted EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 01:51, 10 September 2007 (UTC) For No image of Naruto is the best image of Naruto.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:00, 10 September 2007 (UTC) I reviewed it. Also, for. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:08, Sep 10, 2007 Yeah, it's okay. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author_{(alliteration affords additional awesome)} 15:40, 10 September 2007 (UTC) Big For! Pointless, biased and poor grammar - the worst review I have ever seen... but somehow it's hilarious! GAZCO Itsa me, Gazco! (Yay for meeeee!) 19:42, 10 September 2007 F☭R, For, in the Dragon Ball Z sense of the word. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 02:34, 13 September 2007 (UTC) For... BELIEVE IT!! -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 18:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC) For!. The.original.joe.shmoe blahsquid!! 17:26, 14 September 2007 (UTC) Dig I get what you're going for, and I really dig it. I know many of these people. --THINKER 22:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC) For To what could have become medicore this is superb!--Dr. Fenwick 18:55, 18 September 2007 (UTC) BELIEVE IT! --RandomDie 20:40, 20 September 2007 (UTC) For - David Gerard 09:37, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Reluctant For Despite the fact that it's written bad (on purpose), and I'm not a big fan of anime, I couldn't help but laugh at this one. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 09:11, 26 September 2007 (UTC) For --General Insineratehymn 20:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC) Strong For– Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.72.19.209 (talk • contribs) For Made me laugh and ridicules anime fans. Definite for! The Oblong Lobster 20:42, 1 October 2007 (UTC) Weeeeeeeeeak For, but still a for. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 22:06, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Against: 4	Trust your instincts, Under user. This isn't funny. --So So 04:26, 17 September 2007 (UTC) Against -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 03:03, 26 September 2007 (UTC) Sorry I didn't find it that funny. --- UnIdiot \| \| Talk \| Contribs - 01:15, 27 September 2007 (UTC) Against - Believe it, bitch. --AAA! (AAAA) 05:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC) No Didn't do it for mah --Moneke 06:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Abs. Um, did I miss something? It has a couple of good lines, and I like the Guybrush reference, but I didn't see a highlight-worthy article there. The votes of some good writers leads me to believe I've missed out, so I'm copping out. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:51, 16 September 2007 (UTC) The article is a parody of how an average preteen anime fan would describe his interest in the program. --THINKER 06:51, 27 September 2007 (UTC)