From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Forest Whitaker's Lazy Eye
|
Score: 5 celebrities visiting uncyc
|
| Nominated by:
|
SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:32, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 13
|
- nom + for. i have no delusions of this gaining enough support to reach the front page, and i have no idea what it would look like on said front page, but VFH is slow, and i lol'ed. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:32, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- I love it! —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:33, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- This is gunna fail so hard But I laugh too. Woody On Fire!
 Talking Woody Stalking Woody 15:59, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- For, although it could have done without the "Hey! You guys don't have an article on me!" section. The red link does it on its own. On further thought, once someone actually creates Forest Whitaker, the joke will be ruined. Oh well. For anyway. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:27, Jul 16
- I've actually thought of a couple different ways to fix that if it does happen. If this gets featured (lol) I would hope the admins could protect Forest Whitaker unless someone requests to create it. But if they won't, I've got a couple ideas. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 00:32, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- We probably wont, as that infringes on the whole "free encyclopedia that anyone can edit" thing, unless it's recreated multiple times with shitty content or vandalism. --
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  19:36, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- Well, given that this has about as much of a chance getting featured as my userpage does, I'm pretty sure it will never come to that. And then, one day, when this article has long since been forgotten, Forest Whitaker will be created, and no one will care. It brings a tear to my eye, it does. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 13:50, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- You could simply create the Forest Whitaker page as a redirect to here, and change the links in this page to "That page does not exist." Keeps the joke as fresh as before, and minimises the likelihood that someone will create the page (either out of spite or coincidence). Pup t 10:09, 27/07/2009
- For. Suitably terrible. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN16:07, 16 Jul
- For. It's funny. Simple as that. --noamshouseparty 18:12, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- For HELL YEAH! 'Bout time it's on here. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:52, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- For, just to spite Woody. TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:31, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 Har de Har I did enjoy this. --Sir Sunbeam no u F@H KUN 11:43, 18 July 2009 (UTC)- For. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 18:43, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- For. Dame
Sonje Eric 15:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- For.
 Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:49, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- For. --Docile hippopotamus 09:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 8
|
- Against. Yeah, sorry. For the record, I still think this should be made into the Forest Whitaker article, with the angle being about his lazy eye rather than, say, his acting ability and critical acclaim thereof. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 16:13, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 Against. Per Guildy Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 16:40, 15 July 2009 (UTC)- Against. This is fucking dumb. -- rotted Ape (discalceate) (Riot Porn) 21:55, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- Against. Really didn't make me laugh. --UU - natter
 09:21, Jul 20
- Against Not FA. Like it somewhat, but not enough. --THINKER 08:31, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- Against.. A wasp chewer. --
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 23:24, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- Against. 1/2 per Guildy, 1/2 Thinker.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 18:46, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- Against I hate to say it, but I didn't like this at all. I did't laugh, giggle, or even smirk once the whole time. Staircase CUNt 22:51, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- I think it's good, but not FA. Pup t 04:17, 27/07/2009
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Har de Har I did enjoy this. --
Against. Per Guildy 
