Uncyclopedia:VFH/Category:Filial Piety Nominations

Article: Category:Filial Piety Nominations	Score: 1 renominations of the same article
Nominated by:	– Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 07:32 Mar 19, 2011
For: 11	Wow! Did you see that? A talk page just got featured! Let's see how far we can take this. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 07:32 Mar 19, 2011 For, though I was gonna write some actual text on the category or something, but fuck that honestly TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 07:39, March 19, 2011 (UTC) For. Filial Piety Scofield 09:08, March 19, 2011 (UTC) For. Quick "for" before all the existential moralising "against"s. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:02, March 19, 2011 (UTC) For I actually can predict the order of against votes. I do it all the time when one of my articles get nominated. Haven't ever been wrong, either. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:20, March 19, 2011 (UTC) For I read this article three times, and got more out of it each time. Aleister 16:22 19-3-'11 For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:17, 19 March 2011 I dare say! The masses won't understand this on the front page at all! Who are we to alienate our loyal readers? These people come here every day, praying to heaven For. good articles, and we are to disappoint them with this drivel? Are you aware that we may drive some poor sap to suicide? And then what? Who are we to blame when there's blood on our hands? Who will stand and say "I voted for the article!" Will it be you? Do you want that on your conscience? I don't think so. What are we, working for the socialists now? You know their propaganda has destroyed our sense of proper humor, don't you? Take a look around. Slowly, day by day, our paradise is being corrupted by scoundrels like this, scoundrels would dare insinuate that a category page belongs on the frontpage of uncyclopedia. First, it's a talkpage. Then it's a category. Why, before long, we'll be featuring our own shit stains and the Marqui de Sade himself will come back from the dead to tell us how fucked up we are. Before long, our entire organization will be participating in corrupt satanic orgies and everyone will call us bastards. Everyone will leave out site because they think blue comedy is evil, just like how nobody watches south park anymore because it is evil, and we might get kicked out of our Ivy League clubs, and we will no longer be able to enforce the standards of comedy and that is bad. User:Mrthejazz/sig 03:16, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Funnier than Filial Piety --Roman Dog Bird 03:10, March 21, 2011 (UTC) For - My nomination got it featured, bitches. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 08:44, Mar. 21, 2011 I got a huge kick out of reading all of the past nominations, and some of it made me laugh out loud more than many featured articles. My god, a lot more people used to vote on things in the past no? I LOVE this guys articles tons, LOVE THEM, but I never understood what on earth/for the love of god/but seriously WHAT is so great about this article??? but I think this is helarious and very worthy of featuring :) So many clickable things too that lead you to different things in the sight for those who never see begind the scenes stuff. Lets be bold!!! --ShabiDOO 01:58, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Against: 10	Against. Kindergarten Uncyclopedia. *RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 16:23, March 19, 2011 (UTC) Against. Seriously, just no. ChiefjusticePS2 16:39, March 19, 2011 (UTC) Oh for crying out loud. pillow talk 18:26, March 19, 2011 (UTC) Against. I don't really do voting against but I think I voted for Filial Piety at least twice and now this.... --Sog1970 19:02, March 19, 2011 (UTC) No. 1 2 3 4 ~ 00:33, 20 March 2011 Against. We're on to its Cat now? I'd make a joke, but then I'd have to remember it to ensure that I didn't accidentally use it again the next time this gets nominated. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:53, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Existential moralising against*. Alternatively, just not finding it funny against. --UU - natter 21:17, Mar 20* Against. Looks like another valiant effort to get a featured inside joke that's liable to turn off visitors and potential new uncyclopedians. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 07:29, March 22, 2011 (UTC) Against. I don't get it. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:02, March 22, 2011 (UTC) I'll probably vote for this after you nom it at least 5 more times. -- The Zombiebaron 22:41, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. What's funny with that? ~ 08:57, March 20, 2011 (UTC) You will be able to ask that question again in about three months when this gets renominated. I can also predict it will rain in the Atacama desert this year too. --*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 07:25, March 22, 2011 (UTC)