Uncyclopedia:VFH/Search for God (Nietzsche's eternally recurring nomination)

Article: Search for God	Score: 7
Nominated by:	—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:27, 11 January 2011
For: 16.5	Nom+For. I came, I saw and I was baffled. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:27, 11 January 2011 Self-for. I know it's here somewhere. Nominally Humane! some time Tuesday, 12:37, Jan 11 2011 UTC For. it'd make a weird front page. --Sog1970 12:41, January 11, 2011 (UTC) Snrk. 1 2 3 4 ~ 15:03, 11 January 2011 For. I actually went back to the vfh page to make sure I didnt do something wrong! Shabidoo 04:25, January 12, 2011 (UTC) For. Fooled me, very clever. -- 83.31.241.87 21:47, January 12, 2011 (UTC) Weak For. Very clever, though I agree with Sycamore's sentiment as well. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:46, January 13, 2011 (UTC) For. ^Dame 14:02, January 13, 2011 (UTC) For. Another n00b 18:22, January 13, 2011 (UTC) For. Can this really be featured? ~ 18:23, January 13, 2011 (UTC) Funny. TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 06:50, January 14, 2011 (UTC) Weak for. Clever? Yes. Funny? Yes, but only for a split second. --Black Flamingo 11:56, January 16, 2011 (UTC) Weak People may remember it once they see it. And I want to see how an admin will feature it. Aleister 12:41 16 1 '11 For. per aleister's reason. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 11:05, January 22, 2011 (UTC) Weak Not enough ketchup. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 01:03, January 25, 2011 (UTC) For. -- Nihilist 18:43, February 4, 2011 (UTC) OMG! Atheists are taking over uncyclopedia! GAHHH! Asplodes -- 20:05, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
Against: 9.5	Against. A one joke novelty at best.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:07, January 11, 2011 (UTC) Against. Not much merrit. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 12:47, January 12, 2011 (UTC) Against. It's really a list but in disguise. *RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 07:58, January 13, 2011 (UTC) Against MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 08:29, January 13, 2011 (UTC) Against. Meh. I chuckled, but only in annoyed, trite amusement. -- Sir SF13** (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 11:42 EST 17 JAN 2011 Against. I don't really know what the content would be for that one. Smuff ^[kthnxbai] 13:04, January 22, 2011 (UTC) Against. Clever and funny, but it is too petty to deal a highlight's impact.--Fg390~.~All your face are belong to huffs. 17:49, January 28, 2011 (UTC) Against. That was for blasphemy! 120.56.160.235 06:17, January 29, 2011 (UTC) Objection Because I'm just an objectionable person. Besides, even if it never features, I will always consider this a winner due to this vote. Nominally Humane! some time 06:43, January 29, 2011 (UTC) Against. Although this is a great article, I don't think it would fit well formatted for the main page. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 20:11, February 5, 2011 (UTC) Against. ChiefjusticeGameCube 15:51, February 16, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Airhogs, where's your Uncyclopedian spirit? That could just as easily be a reason to vote for, just to see what whoever comes up with. Aren't you the least bit curious? 1 2 3 4 ~ 07:58, 6 February 2011 Comment. Yeah, but, knowing WikiMarkup, I can imagine. Besides, the searchbox should say break=no. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 08:50, February 6, 2011 (UTC) Thanks for your suggestion. When you believe the VFH page needs improvement, please feel free to change it. You can edit almost any page on Uncyclopedia by just following the "Edit" link at the top of the page. We encourage you to write articles, since wikis like ours develop faster when everybody contributes. You can always preview your edits before you publish them or test them out in your userspace. If you need additional help, check out our getting started page or ask the friendly folks at AAN. Also, you may want to log in, but it's not mandatory. 1 2 3 4 ~ 08:53, 6 February 2011 It being featured, and VFH being closed for the week, I thought it best not to mess with it. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 08:55, February 6, 2011 (UTC) Oh yeah, you're a bot. You hav an excuse to have written that so fast. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 08:59, February 6, 2011 (UTC) Not featured yet, and voting against just makes it less likely. So instead of voting against, why not fix it, eh? Besides, what's the point of a VFH nom if not to annoy the admins? In fact, what's the point of doing most things here if not to annoy someone? 1 2 3 4 ~ 09:17, 6 February 2011 Especially the admins :) But like I said, I still don't think it will format well, even if we had iFrames in WikiMarkup it still wouldn't work. And I think formatting problems are in this case funier than the joke. If you think I should be neutral, then... then... I'M ENTITLED TO MY OWN OPINION!!!!!!! —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 09:36, February 6, 2011 (UTC) No, Im just arguing for the sake of arguing. If you figure larger problems warrant an against, then thats your call. Indeed you are. 1 2 3 4 ~ 09:40, 6 February 2011 Thank you. And thanks for the argument, too. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 09:42, February 6, 2011 (UTC) BTW, the ICU you tagged Door stopper with expired. Okay, I'm done with this page now, and will leave. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 09:46, February 6, 2011 (UTC)