From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion. |
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Huff I want my 30 seconds back. --General Insineratehymn 07:35, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- They can take our 30 seconds, but they can never take our FREEEEEDOOOOOM! Delete. --EMC [TALK] 07:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch
 07:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Blarch it Very short. --
 Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:35, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- How did this survive NRV? --
 » >UF|TLK|▋» 15:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk
 - 19:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 22:39, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete its a handy stub with nubs.--AyumiKitada 23:00, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Huff. Lenoxus 05:49, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- I know i'm not supposed to add stuff here til there're below 15 items listed but facts are i've already listed it once but strange but untrue removed it, plus it's only an image, and is dreadful, so it'll only take seconds to vote on. it's unpleasent, not funny, and not used on any pages. Delete! - jack mort | cunt | talk - 19:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as it is obviously pointless and is not used by any current articles. To the showers with it!--Ljlego 20:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete: perhaps it should've been a QVFD? --EMC [TALK] 07:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- The band deserves better than this article. Delete. --General Insineratehymn 08:52, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- *cry* - jack mort | cunt | talk - 14:59, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- NO! --» >UF|TLK|▋» 16:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Pretty bad. Delete
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- k33p - I think it's pretty funny. And besides, pages about Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky aren't very topical either. --El Destructeso 23:55, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- People still know what Bill and Monica was about, but most don't have a damn clue who Harriet Miers is. The cultural saturation of the Lewinsky incident was thousands of times greater. Most random people will read this and go "huh??" and then leave Uncyclopedia. --
 » His Majesty King George VI (the boxes)     23:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I think for the time being people will still remember Harrie Miers. It was a prett big story. --El Destructeso 00:35, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I remember Harriet Myers. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep She's George W. Bush's only groupie. It would be a shame to lose that. Dame
 GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:41, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. As per above. goshzillacorrespondence 06:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete Not funny, no longer topical, not worth keeping. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 23:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- I know who the fuck she is and i'm not even american. this article's poor though - jack mort | cunt | talk - 11:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- This article eats dick. Delete. --EMC [TALK] 01:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Kept —Braydie 16:44, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Chop off all but three elements of every list and keep. There's some funny stuff lurking in there somewhere. --
 (but) Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per all of my previous votes on this one, damn it all! —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 02:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- "It has reached the point of being a parody of itself and its kind. We keep this one around so that we can have an excuse to summarily delete all the other ones like it. --Spin 23:20, 25 June 2006 (UTC)", I agree with Spintherisim. -- The Zombiebaron 04:01, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- KeepFacking, I read through this and theres just so much of random everthing, I couldn't help laughing at alot of the jokes.--Witt,
 of  UNion Entertain me* 23:31, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep; this is the second or third time this has been put up for VFD. Obviously, we decided to keep it then, so stop nominating it. End of story. --EMC [TALK] 23:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - But rewrite. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- I have thought this over and am now setting my vote to Keep. I've found parts of it funny, but it's just too long. If someone can fix it, go ahead, if not, then someone can re-nominate it for nuking. (I'm feeling pacifistic... bah.) --» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:54, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Head, spinning. Feeling of deja vu...woozy.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- MO, I think I actually sat next to you on the bench during the previous session as well. ~
 10:51, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
Vanitycruft which has lasted way too long. Names names, rants on and on randomly... --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:58, 28 February 2007 (UTC)- Delete --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 23:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Support for not Supporting the Support of this -- The Zombiebaron 23:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)- Thereistoomuchcrapheregetridofitallfortheloveofgodplease! --Smrt-guy 01:56, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- it's got some funny, some passable random, but i will never read the whole thing. this needs to lose at least a third of it's length before i'll vote keep - jack mort | cunt | talk - 11:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete looks like shit Fou-Lu 04:51, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete i dont get "it" --AyumiKitada 07:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Not again... Please refer to here and here for the previous votes on this article (that I could find). —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 02:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- I don't get it, what in your opinion is the value of this article? The main argument seems to be "it sucks so much we should keep it as an example of what sucky pages are like". --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 06:15, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Kept —Braydie 16:44, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Forest Fire Week escapee. Vulgar. -- Mitch 04:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 07:28, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete To short not funny and i was offended Dr.AyumiKitada 07:51, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Blarch it. A bad, rude band article which quickly degenerates into lists. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Burn it - And I don't mean copy it. --AAA! (AAAA) 09:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- We need another FFW. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:09, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 19:40, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- not the best but not that terrible either, vfd's meant to be for the dismal not just the average - jack mort | cunt | talk - 23:13, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep A pretty average article. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:49, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep My comment is the average of the two above. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep ...for now. Given a rewrite, it'd be OK. Assuming nobody does this, it's pretty much worthless since the Big Brother article says it all anyway. {{RabbiTechno 23:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC)}}
|
| Delete |
- Delete - Blatant hate article, reads too much like a foul-mouthed soapbox rant to be funny. Perhaps it were re-written from a more humorous perspective, such as claiming Jade was a race relations campaigner or the UK ambassador to India, or something? Icanhearthegrassgrow 23:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - I have never heard of that person, therefore, isn't it vanity DELETE Capercorn 01:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Tee hee. I've never heard of that person, and I'm at the centre of the universe, isn't that vanity? :P -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - An article about a person I haven't heard of should STILL make me laugh. This one does not. I will take this vote back if one or two people who HAVE heard of her tell us it's funny. --Smrt-guy 02:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- I have and it is. It's a British thing. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:35, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Kept —Braydie 19:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- k33p - Yeah, it's stupid and immature. But who really cares? --El Destructeso 01:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- This is horrible. Absolutely horrible. --General Insineratehymn 23:03, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Roman Dog Bird 23:07, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- huuuuff - jack mort | cunt | talk - 23:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Give me back my 2 minutes. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 23:40, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 00:29, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- No comment --AAA! (AAAA) 00:41, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete - Not funny, just plain stupid, bad pictures, and someone's obvious attempt at a vanity article about their dog. Just please huff it. --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~21:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Pointless. Delete Roman Dog Bird 23:08, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- bad - jack mort | cunt | talk - 23:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- d3l373 - Not funny. --El Destructeso 01:51, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - does not belong on Uncyc for all the above reasons, plus, my FCR is much cuter than that! --Smrt-guy 02:06, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete - Very Incoherent, jumps around a lot, very short, hasn't been worked on since August, author hasn't fixed it since July, not funny, very stupid. Capercorn 00:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- THis article can be summed up by quoting it: "But I digress." --Smrt-guy 01:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- randumb oldness --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Get rid of this, it seems to make no sense, and has little to no point Shadowlost 15:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Gone. And remember to use {{VFD}} next time. -- The Zombiebaron 03:24, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- keep --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 06:51, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 15:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Why is everyone being so offended by everything at the moment? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:24, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep because there are differing degrees of baby eating. And you be amazed at how much you eat your baby. But this would also benefit from a section on eating babie veggies too. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:56, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep! - this was exactly the sick laugh I needeed this Monday. It needs some grammar & spelling cleanup, and should probably be moved to HowTo:, but it's wonderfully funny. --Smrt-guy 23:53, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- keep Eating babbies is the only phun Ive's got lepht in lives... -- di Mario 22:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep This is indeed a somewhat funny article. Not the most hillarious thing I've ever read, but not really that bad. Since when did Uncyclopedia become a place where we hesitated to offend people a bit? Shadowlost 15:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- HUFF IT This is just sick, there is already a "Better" article on the subject, and it's just to low for uncyclopedia. Capercorn 20:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Kill it so it doesn't grow back. --Andorin Kato 22:09, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- memset(article,0,sizeof(article)); --» >UF|TLK|▋» 05:23, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Shock humour isn't a lot of good without humour. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 09:55, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Ick. Detailed, purely race-based descriptions of edible children are not my green eggs and ham. Or something. — Lenoxus 00:37, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I liked it better when it was called "A Modest Proposal" by Johnathan Switf. --Death Itself 02:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Delete The humor value could be better (I concur with User:Death Itself), and this concept is more appropriate for ED than Uncyc. If not deleted, then merge somewhere. --Pentium5dot1 02:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - It is sick and disgusting. I hate it, it is dumb. Yellow 130 22:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Prime axiom of logic: If offensive, then funny. Er...-- Lenoxus 00:37, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Not that dead babies aren't funny to begin with. But that's where the "humor" bit Sir Ben mentioned comes in. — Lenoxus 00:37, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- If you don't huff it, at least merge it with Baby Eating, it is more detailed on the subject
- Kept, voting closed. -- The Zombiebaron 03:22, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep -- it's a funny picture, and you never know when you'll need one. Hell, I might use parts of it in the Epic Poem rewrite project. ----OEJ 20:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. -- Mitch 00:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. So it was uploaded by an asshole, couldn't it be used on the Opera page? It is a fat lady singing.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 02:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I don't like it, but that doesn't mean there is a reason to delete it. --The Zombiebaron 23:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Meh... Keep it - Put it in somthing then keep it. Oprea is a good place to put it, I might do that. Capercorn 00:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- KeepIt's being used now. Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 04:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- It isn't orphaned anymore, keep. Yellow 130 22:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete - Weird, orphaned, not original, and uploaded by a sock of you-know-who. --AAA! (AAAA) 14:15, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 15:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --EMC [TALK] 16:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Fuck *********. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 18:22, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- doesn't matter who it was uploaded by or what it was uploaded for, it only matters that it is serving a function on uncyclopedia, which it isn't, cos it's not on any pages - jack mort | cunt | talk - 15:28, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- 1) Is it being used? no; 2) Is it original? no Delete Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 02:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- It is acctually on Opera, and was at the time of your comment PP. -- The Zombiebaron 02:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- extreme programming it sounds like one of them cases where one part of the constituents say "but we might need it in the near future" while an almost equal other part of the consistuents say "naah, why bother". Extreme programming recommends leaving out the feature in such divided cases.
- Kept, voting closed. -- The Zombiebaron 03:22, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- keep, article about man vs babies, *nod* - jack mort | cunt | talk - 01:26, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- keep fun ingriedients abound. The very notion of such an occurecnce! -- di Mario 22:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep??? I really can't decide whether to love or hate this article - I just know I feel very strongly about it whichever one it is that I feel. I just have to quote the following grammatical nightmare though: "The babies were thrown into the mantle when there were too much babies." -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and Expand I see a lot of potential for this article, I reccommend it be ICU'd or put up for a Pee Review, and see if we can't make it better.
- Keep I laughed the whole way through. Fix the grammar though. You could quick fix the above sentence substituting "many" for "much". --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 19:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- To be honest, that sentence kind of typefied the article for me - for some reason the bad grammar belongs there, at least in my mind. "All babies were dumped into the hot mantle of the Earth, in which they burned because it's all lava there." Maybe I do secretly hate it... -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Nom and Delete - while it's not the stupidest thing I've seen around here, it's awfully close. --Smrt-guy 23:41, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Randub. -- herr doktor needsAshuttle
 [scream!] 23:46, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Do I Even have to say it, yes, HUFF IT - This is t3h ub3r 1337 suxzorz. Seriously. EDIT: I think that the person who wrote it was under 14. Capercorn 00:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Kept. —Braydie 03:19, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep it Mothra Focka! - I agree with the others. I has potential to be a great article. It just needs some work. (Kip the Dip 07:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC))
- k33p - I think it deserves to be kept. I think it's pretty funny. --El Destructeso 23:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- I laughed --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 23:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and add more jokes I did laugh. Capercorn 00:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Let it live! It has potential, I laughed a bit, obviously needs work, but hey, give it a chance! --Marto 85 04:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and Expand Quickly It does indeed have the potential to be funny, but as it is now, it is quite huffable. ICU it and lets get it fixed up.Shadowlost 15:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- To those who want to delete I say: "Your sister". -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 13:27, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep it I laughed after reading only a bit expand it though. Yellow 130 21:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete. It makes your mother look funny. --El Zoof 21:02, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Soft Delete - Fairly good idea that quickly slides into crap. Someone more talented will eventually take this on. --Smrt-guy 23:41, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Dude, this article is messed up. Get rid of it. General Tso's Chicken 20:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Kept. —Braydie 03:19, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep Kind of funny even if I have no idea what it's going on about for most of the time. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 13:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep with a 7-day stay of execution. If no one fixes the ugliness by then, Huff it. --User:Smrt-guy 23:45, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 01:19, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- keep I just spoke to lestat and he is OK on this -- di Mario 22:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Akasha sez its all good! That and i dont want to corect the spelling of Aaliyah's name agen. Dr.AyumiKitada 23:23, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete A clear violation of... Common Decency (Humor). --Captain Kickass 11:39, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Boring book, boring film, boring soundtrack. Shame the whole lot of 'em can't be deleted along with the article. {{RabbiTechno 23:13, 2 March 2007 (UTC)}}
|
| Comments |
It's really really not funny Matt lobster 21:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Kept. —Braydie 03:19, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
Keep Not worth the energy to delete. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 22:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Pointless, not funny, stupid, and not even a complete thought. Possibly not even worth the energy to delete. --Smrt-guy 22:35, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 23:29, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- d3l373 - I don't get the joke. --El Destructeso 00:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Created by someone with 17 A* GCSEs? Delete out of pure jealousy. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- what! - jack mort | cunt | talk - 11:39, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- ^^^^Yeah really, Delete Roman Dog Bird 01:23, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:57, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Gone. —Braydie 03:19, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete - Complete lack of funny. Poorly written. It hurts my spleen. --Smrt-guy 22:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 22:50, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- d3l373 - Not funny, and the way it's written makes it seem like a Wikipedia article. --El Destructeso 00:37, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- this could be good, it it had like a 90% rewrite - jack mort | cunt | talk - 11:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Roman Dog Bird 01:21, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:57, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Gone. —Braydie 03:07, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete Ugh, looks very ED like to me.
 Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- omg - jack mort | cunt | talk - 12:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Slandanity. Not sure you really needed to put that picture up for deletion separately Jack Mort - how about I stick it in the comments and it'll probably go along with the article? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 14:30, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete* Such unfunny crap, delete... with extreme prejudice. This person seems to not know how to be funny, and has instead elected to just be stupid Shadowlost 14:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 18:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Well this has got to go. General Tso's Chicken 20:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete looks like shit Fou-Lu 20:59, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Wow, this morons a Nazi, delete it. Capercorn 23:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- HOLY SHIT, MY EYES: Delete Roman Dog Bird 01:19, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:03, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Livejournal is your friend --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:27, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- d3l373 - What the hell is a "Dilley?" --El Destructeso 02:01, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Jack Mort would particularly like to request the deletion of Image:Arse.gif which appears in this article. I didn't really think it needed its own vote - any massive objections, post here... -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 14:34, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Gone. —Braydie 03:05, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- aww comon guys! Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:08, 2 March 2007 (UTC) Eh?
- Comment - Do you always vote for keep on every article? --AAA! (AAAA) 22:13, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete - Not really that good, and the only contributor was 202.78.154.232. --Efitu» Talk|Wikipedia|Email|F@H|Wikia 19:03, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete just because it's 202.78.154.232's. He's a fucker. --EMC [TALK] 19:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- rubbish - jack mort | cunt | talk - 20:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Rubbish, so delete Get rid of this crap --Shadowlost 07:08, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This article sucks. General Tso's Chicken 20:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Unoriginal, and just plain sucks --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Huff Very short. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 22:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 22:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete No redeeming value AT ALL. Yellow 130 22:56, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - Yu-Gay-Oh articles have no space on this very sophisticated website. Capercorn 23:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Kill it please! I hate to see crap like this suffer. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:39, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, god damnit Roman Dog Bird 01:16, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:01, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --AAA! (AAAA) 10:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --AAA! (AAAA) 10:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --AAA! (AAAA) 10:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm that deperate. --AAA! (AAAA) 10:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- 17 huff votes... that's gotta be a record. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 23:47, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- I don't think you guys really get the joke. It's a reference to a series of cartoons on YouTube called "Yu-Gi-Oh: The Abridged Series." They're actually pretty funny; you should check them out. [1] That being said, my vote is still to d3l373. – Preceding unsigned comment added by El Destructeso (talk • contribs)
- It would've been better had it not just been fancruft about a fandub. If they're going to write something about Rex Raptor, they oughta do it without being unoriginal. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:44, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete - Stupid, random, short & unloved. Put it out of its misery. --Smrt-guy 20:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nothing to do with the subject at hand? Check. Pointless crap? Check. Verdict? Delete. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 22:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Merge with Iced Tea as indicated. Unfortunately, since this article contains nothing of value, this basically means delete. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- d3l373 - Uh no. --El Destructeso 00:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete - short, ugly, and stupid. The article sucks also. --Smrt-guy 01:19, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 01:47, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Koopa it --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - This article has been weighed, it has been measured, and it has been found wanting. --Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 03:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Has a vanity flare, and an unfunny hue. -- The Zombiebaron 00:51, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Very unfocused, doesn't appeal to me. —Braydie 00:55, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for nominating this unfunny article for Delete-ion! --Smrt-guy 01:19, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 01:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete - It didn't make me laught, It's shortish, no real work on it has been done since 2005. Its just a couple paragraphs worth rip on France. (Though I still hate France). Capercorn 00:58, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete The bulk of the prose is bad fake math. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 01:43, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Ho hum, boring French ripping, and badly done. Crap. --Smrt-guy 02:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- yeah, no good - jack mort | cunt | talk - 20:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Stupid, Delete Now - I didn't find it funny and it's way short. Hasn't been worked on in over a year (OK now I will stop nominating articles now). Capercorn 01:32, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - I'll put aside the fact that I don't get it (my 2 weeks in London did not fully indoctrinate me to humour) but it just looks crass & ugly. --Smrt-guy 02:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Begone, this is not for your brains! --Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 04:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- yeah it's pretty bad, i like the concept though. basically british porn isn't allowed genitals or actual sex, so it's all hillariously bad to make up for it - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Kill it. Not funny and rendundant (there's other joke page on the same subject which looks "official"). -- herr doktor needsAshuttle [scream!] 03:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This is the second time this week that I've found a recently created page on VFD! Use {{ICU}}! Oh, and use {{VFD}}. -- The Zombiebaron 05:29, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Burniate it. It's just stupid. --Naughty Budgie 08:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- BURNINATE! eh?--
 » >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 11:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- WTF??? --Smrt-guy 20:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Pure Shit. I have seen Terrible articles but this is article is almost as bad as listening to Kidz Bop--Imaginarykid27 14:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. No question about it. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 22:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- I actually thought it was pretty funny. I literaly laughed out loud when I read this opening paragraph. Sure, it needs work, but not deletion. (Kip the Dip 07:02, 28 February 2007 (UTC))
|
| Delete |
- Delete' - Crap content, crap images. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Huff The first image was good... until I realised it was a gif and it loaded more frames... unneccessary --Marto 85 04:34, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- ICU tagged. If it survives 7 days, you can renominate it Cs1987. -- The Zombiebaron 05:34, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete - Unfunny page that's just taking the Russian double reversal joke too far, and a blatant ripoff of it. --AAA! (AAAA) 04:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed, delete. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 04:37, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- put any worthwhile lines into double reversal and huff what's left over - jack mort | cunt | talk - 19:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- DELETE Roman Dog Bird 21:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- In Soviet Russia...no, fuck it. Just die --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:02, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's not not not not entirely unfunny. Splorch --El Zoof 22:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- In Soviet Russia, HUFF IT says YOU!! - quad reversal is the same as regular reversal. Capercorn 22:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Aww - I have a strange liking for it, and I want to know why it makes my browser lag! Somebody care to enlighten me before the seemingly inevitable deletion? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:51, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- DELETE, Just plain stupid.
    19:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- DELETE, a special class of stupid. --El Zoof 02:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Have you never heard of an ICU Tom? Geeze. -- The Zombiebaron 21:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - My head hurts --AAA! (AAAA) 22:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- d3l337 - I'm not sure of what the joke is supposed to be. All I know is that it's not funny and it's a lame knock-off of Censorship. --El Destructeso 23:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Clealy stupid. Delete --Smrt-guy 23:43, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Dumb gimmick. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- U83R D31373, Uber-waste of bandwith. Capercorn 00:30, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Huff No content. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 00:37, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 01:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- AGH MY EYES --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Nah, I rarely do VFD so I chose this route. 21:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Gone. -- The Zombiebaron 02:28, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 05:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Rewrite and Keep we watch this garbage every week on TV because MXC is one of the funnier shows on cable television. Its sort of the Idiots version of Woody Allen's Whats Up Tiger Lilly. But it needs a complete rewrite. If we were dealing with a death in the family I'd do it, but guys, I am too freakin exhausted. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 15:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and then Rewrite- I watch this show with my family all the time, it's funny to watch and the writing is quick, smart and always funny. The article isn't though, but I'm sure we could rebuild it, we have the technology. MXC and Guy LeDouche will survive.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 07:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Article is about a notable Japanese gameshow but is short, picless, and without good jokes. For info see Wickedpedia's article for background.----OEJ 23:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Shy Delete - based on OEJ's comment, it could be funny, albeit obscure. --Smrt-guy 00:07, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- it's not obscure, i've seen it on english tv, it's a genius show, but this article's no good - jack mort | cunt | talk - 00:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- FIRE!!! --» >UF|TLK|▋» 23:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
I should also note that footage from Takeshi's Castle is used for MXC in the US, if that helps anyone here. –H.01:21 UTC, 02.20.2007
- I wish one of you guys who have seen parts of the show would do some work on the article. Four days on VFD and it's still teh crap! ----OEJ 22:55, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- I see a bunch of "rewrite" votes, but not a lot of "rewrite". Shit or get off the pot. I'm coming back tomorrow with my black hood on.
 Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 02/24 15:27
|
| Keep |
- Keep, just to hang onto that "Liar, but you end God" thing. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 19:40, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, but tag for improvement somehow. I think I'd have found it funnier if I'd known who he was though. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Study up. The guy's either a genius, or a madman. Only time will tell... --Medvedev (scream)
 07:13, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- It looks like Slandity to me. Anyone see otherwise? Delete --Smrt-guy 02:28, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Just because it isn't slandanity, doesn't mean that it isn't bad. Kill. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 23:49, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete: Wikipedia's is almost funnier, whereas this is held together by sentences like "By the way, the antichrist is trying to gain control over all human beings." —Lenoxus 00:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This is not funny, it's more of an all out insult on DeAngelo, and it's not funny at all, too stupid. -- Elmis 22:45, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- There is a WP article: Wikipedia:David DeAngelo. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:51, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Holy shit, the guy's real?! I could have sworn "he" was a vengeful and sadistic "she" trying to sabotage men. Then again, it's not like the WP picture convinced me otherwise... To the point: I do think Uncyclopedia needs an article about this... person, but I'm just not sure this one cuts it. A rewrite definetly wouldn't hurt. --Medvedev (scream) 10:56, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- (Abstain) It is problematic for reasons to change on voting pages, even more so for insults to be added later. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 20:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- I found this on the template VFD, which is now dead, and figured someone should download it. -- The Zombiebaron 21:42, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep - There's plenty of funny stuff in this article, it just needs some co-ordination. ninebucks 19:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Nom and Delete - This is probably the first Uncyclopedia article to use a "Your Mom" joke, or at least the oldest surviving one. Unfortunately, that doesn't make a single thing in this article funny. -- Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 05:09, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 05:51, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Not about its subject. Delete --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:51, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- the keep vote's from the original author, mate, you wrote it two years ago and you've never added to it or developed it in any way, gotta make the effort if you want your contributions to survive - jack mort | cunt | talk - 15:01, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nope. Random rubbish doth not a funny article make. --El Zoof 05:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Little but (possibly facetious) unfunny praise for "Big Rigs." Only contributors are IPs and inexperienced user 9volt. —Lenoxus 01:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Unfunny, short, badly formatted. Blarch --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 05:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Deletachu, I choose YOU! --El Zoof 05:45, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Best game, but worst article. --AAA! (AAAA) 09:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Its funeral stone will say "I fucked a dog". -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 13:25, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- Kept. Is now a redirect. --The Zombiebaron 02:32, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- It's epic. Not great, but epic. The funny bits are asides inside the poem (which is a god-awful genuine epic poem).--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:47, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'm with Modus. All it needs is someone with enough free time to write an original-to-Uncyclopedia boreing-not-funny-poem, and it'll be great. It also needs wikilinks. --The Zombiebaron 08:20, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. We should have an epic poem. We, meaning me if necessary, shall revise it. Egads, what have I let myself in for? ----OEJ 16:58, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep I love this. Reminds me so much of reading Caucher in English lessons. The comments could do with being more frequent, but I wouldn't even change the poem. The point of this page after all is that nobody will actually read any of the poem itself, so the purpose of the verse is similar to that of a picture or just general page formatting like blank lines to hide text (see Waldo). By the way, I don't think the author claims it's their own work: "Ok, I remember now; it's called the Nibelungenlied. Good stuff, man." I presume it's out of copyright, if that affects anybody's decision. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep but perchance split into parts. We must be nice to the dialups. And hey, it might ven be kind of funny (inadvertantly) to have Epic Poem Part 1, Part 2, etc. -- or even an "archive" -- to emphasize the length. -- Lenoxus 19:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Uh, keep? I spent a long time (by my standards) writing this, and don't want it deleted.--The Jeff Killer 21:34, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete. A few (very) mildly amusing lines scattered throughout an actual epic poem. I doubt it can be made funnier, but feel free to prove me wrong. --El Zoof 06:15, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's just a massive wall of text that leads nowhere. Delete. --General Insineratehymn 06:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- • Spang • ☃ • talk • 06:36, 24 Feb 2007
Plagiarized, eg from [2]. Blarch --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:48, 24 February 2007 (UTC)- It's a good idea, but if it's been plagiarized, then I say Delete - Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 16:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- I've started rewriting this. But you've got to let me know: if I continue rewriting the goddam poem in the manner I've started, will it stay or will it go? If the rewrite in doggerel is not going to prevent a deletion, I surely don't want to waste my time on it. So come on and let me know: will it stay or will it go?
The Clash ----OEJ 18:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Whoops, on rereading I see Zombiebaron suggested a boring-not-funny poem. The one I'm writing is stupidly comical. So do I need to change direction here?----OEJ 20:35, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- don't listen to zombie, funny is good. just copy what you've done to your userspace and let this one be deleted, then when you've finised the rewrite move it back to mainspace from yours - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:48, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Concerned parties and partygoers please see the discussion page. Thanks. ----OEJ 03:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Kept. Voting closed. --The Zombiebaron 00:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete A recently created copy of the Fisher Price-esque Forum:pwn4g3. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:50, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 09:22, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Pathetic ripoff of Fisher Price. And I actually find Fisher Price funny. --AAA! (AAAA) 09:34, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 09:53, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Although it's new, so could just have been ICUed. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:48, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- BALEET! --El Zoof 12:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Fisher Price is better. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- worthless - jack mort | cunt | talk - 16:10, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Ouch! My ego. Yeah, go right ahead. Pigs. -- Lenoxus 18:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete-per nom...we have Forum:Pwn4g3 already.--Scott 19:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- I feel I must have misinterpreted the heaps of praise as meaning that some people really did get ironic giggles out of this; I thought that just because Fisher Price covers similar territory doesn't mean there isn't room for this as well. Oh well. This now brings my total number of deleteds to 3; not sure how I feel about that... -- Lenoxus 18:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- I think mostly there are different people voting here than voting on vfh. move it to your userspace or something, and don't give up - jack mort | cunt | talk - 18:38, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that out. I will indeed do so; the thing is that there really isn't much else that can be done with it, any more than one could expand Fisher Price. You either like it or you hate it. But I'll try not to lose hope... -- Lenoxus 19:48, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Gone. Next time, use an ICU. --The Zombiebaron 23:44, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Huff. I don't really have to explain this, do I? --» >UF|TLK|▋» 05:28, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Blarch as vanity. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:38, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 09:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- vanity most... vain - jack mort | cunt | talk - 15:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Zap Lenoxus 19:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Surely length alone is enough to save an article... what? It isn't? Of course not. Lenoxus 19:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- there is a lot of content, the issue is though that it's written by a group of people about themselves, so though it might be funny to them it's meaningless to everyone else - jack mort | cunt | talk - 20:36, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Really old crap. I came upon this while fumbling for the Recent Changes link but hit Randompage instead. Mhaille started this article in 2005, and it looks like it was abandoned shortly afterwards to be shat upon by the scum that is anonymous IPs. After a year and a half as well as several forest fires, I think it's time for this article to be voted upon. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:58, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Huff Short. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:40, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 09:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 15:41, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- :( -- Lenoxus 19:53, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete.....what is that crap? -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Hardly a real disambig page, and the only link to it is a page full of links to disambig pages. --The Zombiebaron 19:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Should be changed to a redirect to Great war and leave it at that. — Lenoxus 21:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete So many red links, so little point. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 09:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Redirected to Great War. --  02:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Is it a parody? Is it satire? No, it's a turkey! --El Zoof 06:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Huff I can't find any humour. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 13:56, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 09:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- This is entirely factual and has no place here - jack mort | cunt | talk - 15:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yup. Lenoxus 19:54, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Nom and Delete - This is another one that has inexplicably survived to become one of Uncyclopedia's oldest articles. Apparently, in 2005, there wasn't a QVFD. -- Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 05:03, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 05:50, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- I won't miss it. Crude and short. Blarch it --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:49, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Make extinct as per everyone. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 15:46, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete.----OEJ 16:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Ugh. With all these old crappy articles, we should have another Forest Fire Week. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 18:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete but let's not get too depressed or cynical, people. There's something kind of satisfying about encountering the bad stuff and erasing it, no? — Lenoxus 21:43, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Quotey and randumb. -- Mitch 05:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Mentos are gross. Especially the orange ones. The page, however, makes them appear yummy, by comparison. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:43, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. --Andorin Kato 05:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, but find somewhere for the picture. --El Zoof 06:19, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Huff Insults the reader, mainly discusses a YouTube phenomenon. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Mentos, the freshmaker, cannot make this article minty-fresh. So demolish and start over. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 18:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah... Lenoxus 03:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- It seems the thing to parody would be those commercials, which I've heard about, but never seen. Yet no such attempt is made here, sadly — Lenoxus 03:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
|
