Keep |
*Keep. I would kind of like to keep it, which usually wouldn't give m enough morale to vote, but I have a feeling there is a torrent of keeps coming.—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 08:31, February 12, 2010 (UTC) Abstaining.
- We just blocked one of his sockpuppets which proves that the user in question was not the innocent kid you thought he was. You were trolled, and you fell for it. This needs to go now. If people think this article is funny in its own right, fair enough. We do not commemorate trolls. Not ones which are this obvious at it anyway. MrN 08:37, Feb 12
- But I have a feeling this will end up an in-joke; so I really feel that there's no point in voting for deletion, since I'm almost positive it will be kept. And, on its own, it just has a sort of charm to it. (Also, I get your point there; the first one was obvious and pretty much admitted, and all that)—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 08:40, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Eh, changed to abstain.—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 08:46, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak keep. We actually do commemorate trolls, but this article doesn't. When I first saw it, it seemed like an article about poop-flinging monkeys and nothing more, and I'm sure the casual visitor would see it the same way. Delete the talk page if you'd rather. (Weak keep because it is a crap page.) --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 09:01, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
- "We do not commemorate trolls. Not ones which are this obvious at it anyway" I'm sure I said that somewhere before. MrN 10:12, Feb 12
- Keeper Just the title refers to the kid Pie, and not to any of his disruptive socks. And 6 to 8 on VFH just a couple of days ago--six users voted for it for VFH within a few hours--so imnho it shouldn't be huffed for that reason alone. It is also a good article and has a very interesting message (see comment below). It's also on Worst 100 of 2010, so has a history as well in that quarter. And one user has said it's the best article since "Euroipods", so some people do like it very much.Not written by the kid, but by this kid. Adds up to an obvious keep. Aleister in Chains 12:31 12 Feb. MMX
- Weak keep. I don't so much care about the pie kid. Too bad he thought he could sockpuppet his way out of trouble, whatever. The thing is, the article never even comes close to referencing the kid or the drama, and I don't think it's QVFD quality either. Per Syndrome, basically, except I don't think Hardwick Fundlebuggy was a troll. On top of that, the article is principally too young for VFD. I don't see why we shouldn't just follow regular procedure. Someone with the right authority can tag it with an ICU or expand tag. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:55, 12 February 2010
- Had I followed process I would have huffed it already. I know the author is not going to change it much so there is no point using ICU. We use VFD like this sometimes for such things... MrN 17:43, Feb 12
- Did an author not planning to change an article ever save it from ICU? Suppose you ICU it. If it somehow turns into an enjoyable article, then that's great. If it stays the same, then it's bye bye poop throwing monkeys. Just saying. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:48, 12 February 2010
- ICU is really more for those who don't know any better IMO. Like me in this case apparently as these monkeys are kept! MrN 21:44, Feb 12
- Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We are DEVO! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We are DEVO! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We are DEVO! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We are DEVO! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We are DEVO! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We are DEVO! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We are DEVO! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We are DEVO! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We are DEVO! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! OK LET'S GO. -- Roman Dog Bird 16:23, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Strongest Keep Ever I've laughed harder at this than I have at any other article this year. sausage lol 17:47, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
- ( Keep after the fact. Boop! ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 13 Feb 2010 ~ 01:03 (UTC))
|
Delete |
- Delete. Well it did get some votes on VFH so I'm not going to huff it straight away. What does VFD think of this poop? MrN 08:11, Feb 12
- Delete. The concept is crap, the story is gross, the single illustration is repeated 8 times, it takes work to figure out what some of the exclamations mean, and the article's single scatological joke is not told except in a parenthesized stage direction. And I am not impressed by Aleister's celebration that it takes mankind down a notch (as it is not in fact anthropology), nor by HELPME's calculus in trying to figure out how to be on the winning side of the vote. Spıke ¬ 13:06 12-Feb-10
- The four chimps in the cage throw the first poop, then the guy in the suit talks, then the four chimps are shown again as they throw more poop. Then the guy in the suit throws poop. That's why the illustrations repeat. Al in Chains, a few minutes later.
- And I just made the man in the suit a professor of anthropology, which enhances the article into a clearer perspective of my comment, below. Thanks for the idea, see, these VFD's can improve a page just by discussion alone. Thanks again, Aleister in Chains 13:40 12 Feb. MMX
- Hardly an enhancement, as at state universities, social-science professors as well as their union representatives throw poop with no provocation at all. Imagine emoticon here. Spıke ¬ 14:36 12-Feb-10
|
Comments |
- Comment Put the drama aside, and look at the page on its own. I've come to realize how good it is, because, in a nutshell, a man in a suit goes from an enjoyable moment in his life to becoming a poop throwing monkey himself in about 12 seconds. The guy in the suit poops in his hands (so he must have taken down his pants, a couple of seconds time there) and throws it at the chimps in a territorial dispute. The five primates on the page, four chimps and a human, are defending their "area" (the man, his person, his pride, and his property--the suit), just like I'm doing now with this comment, although in words and not poop. The point is that the page shows in a quick read that humans are primates, we are apes, something denied by a vast majority of the human ape population. So, on the point of it having a message, it should, imnho, be kept. Aleister in Chains 12:37 12 Feb. MMX
Kept I know when I'm beaten ya Poop throwing monkey lovers ya! MrN 21:08, Feb 12
|