User talk:Tooltroll/01

Just for the record. . . (such as it is.)

My very first edit:

• 02:05, 19 April 2006 (hist) (diff) m Let your cat be your shrink (top)

(not counting all the stuff I did before registering, then, it's actually

• 06:49, 18 April 2006 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia (→Overmind - Spoon!) )

Welcome!

Hello, Tooltroll/01, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for nooblets:

• Beginner's Guide
• How to be funny and not just stupid

If you read anything at all, make it the above two links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:

• About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
• Everything you ever wanted to know, but were afraid to ask
• Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask at the Dump. Again, welcome!  --~ sin($) ^tan(€) 11:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Ah bugger... You've been here for some time, haven't you? Well... Never hurts, I guess... Sorry 'bout that... --~ sin($) ^tan(€) 11:16, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Heh. Feces occur, as you say, no harm done. Thanks for thinking of me (snif).--Tooltroll 07:57, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Would it be too blatant if I told you I think about you all the time? --~ sin($) ^tan(€) 08:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Ooooo! Type it like you mean it, big boy! ;P--Tooltroll 08:55, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Heh... I would if I did... ;) --~ sin($) ^tan(€) 10:02, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Tease! Ah, it's just as well. . . my old lady's the jealous type, heh.  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 06:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Re: Homosexual furniture

You nailed it -- it is indeed Photoshopped, original version here. The idea of making it pink and turning into a gay rights allegory came to me in a fevered dream. But anyway, I'm glad you like it. Might you consider nominating it for VFH? Or, barring that, voting for my laff-a-minute article on Hammers? It's currently languishing towards the bottom of the VFH page. Thanks for listening to my shameless self-promotion.

PS: I see you created the "Twins" image for the Fatties article -- great stuff! It goes well with that section. --Jordanus 00:43, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

I appreciate it, friend. And I guess you're right about the Credenza article; I'm just pushing for feedback now because I know that once it gets bumped off the "Recent articles" template, it'll never be seen again. I mean, really: who's gonna be searching for that? I was thinking of putting it in Pee Review, but that place is usually pretty backlogged... Anyway, you got any suggestions for it?

As for your article, I didn't really get the joke at first, but it made much more sense after seeing the original Wiki article. It's a tad random, but I don't see any problem with that. If you think it's ready (it definitely looks that way) you should consider self-nomming on VFH. I would've nommed Credenza, but it's not a week old yet, and still needs some work. --Jordanus 14:47, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Whore Frost on VFH

12 votes over 6 days; 5+/7-; peaked at +3.

Score: -2

• SN+F Nobody can accuse it of being too short. I've cut all I want to cut, and the rest hangs together too well to amputate further.  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 07:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak against. This was actually longer at one point? This should be moved to UnBooks! Anyway, sorry, it's a good effort, but I guess I'm just not down with prostitution-related humor for some reason.  c • > • cunwapquc? 07:13, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Well. . . not all the humour is about prostitutes. . . some of it is about terminal diseases, disaster on a continental scale, and suffering of biblical proportions. What could be funnier?  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 07:57, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

• Very Weak For. Not really what I'd call VFH funny, but where I've "marked down" articles before because they were too short, I'll give you a few points (metaphorical, not score-wise) because you obviously put a lot of time and effort into this. And also because I am down with prostitution-related humour. Very down. --Anyone 12:59, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I guess I just don't understand the humor. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 00:02, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• For A lot of effort clearly went into this. --Jordanus 03:24, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• For --EMC ^[TALK] 04:46, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• No, but I can accuse it of being too long and stupid... -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 06:21, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment I'll stipulate that if you live too far south, and don't get hoar frost on stuff in the winter, you're already at a disadvantage 'getting' it. But stupid? C'mon, there's some gems in there if you read the whole thing. Too long? That's subjective. . .  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 07:32, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

• Against. I can see the talent in this, but the notion of prostitutes freezing to death isn't exactly a barrel of laughs to begin with. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 13:13, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 19:14, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. 21:11, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. How is prostitures freezing to death funny? And it's too long. It deserves to be covered in tar and feathers by Michael Jackson--T-Roooy 11:24, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Is anybody reading more than just the title? The prostitutes are not freezing to death, so some folks either: a) can't read plain english; or b) can't be bothered to read more than a sentence or two before dashing over here to cast an uninformed vote. If you don't care enough to read the thing, why do you bother voting? Why not leave that to the people who actually read it? Just sayin'...  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 12:05, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

• Against. Like HF said, the idea of having frozen prositutes lying dead in the cold is not really such a great thing to start with, and as the whole thing drags on it's just not hard for one to see there is simply no point in this entire dead baby joke. -- The Colonel (talk) 15:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

---

The first cut is the deepest, eh? Just remember for next time:

1. No matter how much you like it, some people won't (my favourite page of mine, and second self nom on VFH, lasted all of a day before being mercy-killed...that hurt)
2. Edit, edit, edit. Even the best page will lose it's audience after five minutes or so (that's why Canada went from one to several pages). Condensed genius is better than whatever the opposite of condensed is.

Good luck on the next one. I'd like to say that it gets easier, but it doesn't...--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:35, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Meh. No skin off my nose, feces occur, and all that. The only thing that bugs me is I get the impression from the comments that some of the against votes were knee-jerk reactions to the length, without having read more than the first paragraph. My attitude is more like: Why should I limit the length to suit the users with ADD? My next effort will probably be just as long or longer, 'cause that's just the way I am, and obviously, some folks appreciated it. . .

Frankly, I'm happy as a pig in shit that it got the + votes it did: that's enough encouragement for me.  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 05:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

TT, I'm sorry about being one of those who appeared to have a knee-jerk reaction about the length (not to mention the content). I know you put a lot of work into that article, and it was well-done, really - but the fact is, it was too long — for that topic. People just don't expect major articles from topics like that, and when they see them, they can't cope... Tell ya what, though. When you feel like you've got another one that's ready for the VFH-sawmill, let me know beforehand, OK? I'm one of the best proofreaders the site has (all modesty aside), and I can help out with things like appropriate length, image selections, captions, layout, the whole nine yards. I'm sorry if it sounds patronizing, but I like where you're headed, man! Just don't forget, topic selection is vital. And you'll know when you've picked the right one, because the article will practically write itself. Anyway... No hard feelings?  c • > • cunwapquc? 05:21, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Aw, shucks. . . Actually, you called it closer than some. It is "prostitution-related humor" (or at least the horrible pun I used for a springboard is.) What cheeses me are the comments about "prostitutes freezing to death", when the second paragraph reads:

"Originally thought to be simply the effects of long-term exposure to subzero temperatures on scantily-dressed, poorly nourished women, it was eventually discovered, during the mid-twentieth century, that WF is actually caused by prions originally hosted by bearatross. Although most reputable scienticians and epidemiologists have accepted the prion theory, some have proposed another possibility."

Which seems to me pretty damning evidence that things get voted on without being read, (or without being more than just quickly skimmed.) That's just wrong. . . like a hockey or football ref who can't even be bothered to pay attention to the game. (Every few days I go to VFH, and check out the new noms. . . When I find something I like, I give it a 4; if it's a total piece of tripe that looks like it was slapped together in a drunken afternoon, (hasn't happened yet) I'll give it a -; but if it's an otherwise well-written article that just doesn't hold my attention because it isn't my "thing" and I don't want to read all of it, I try to realize that my "thing" ain't the only "thing" out there, and abstain.) At least you seem to have a grasp of where I was going with this, so even if I were the type to hold grudges, you wouldn't be one of the grudgees. So I wrote an epic tale of ursine rape and pillage, spanning thousands of years and miles, with an endearing cast of characters of broad depth and scope, incorporating the fundamentals of love, blood and rhetoric. . . and it went over like a plutonium dirigible. 'Tain't worth getting homicidal over. . . maybe herbicidal. . .  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 11:23, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

I know that when I visit VFH, I only look at the pictures. Especially when my stuff appears there. Pictures are pretty. I like pictures. What were we talking about? Oh, yes. Great pic, man. Keep it up.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 15:22, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

¿Which pic?  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 20:58, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

...and I might have sounded a bit dour in my first comment. It does get easier.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 17:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Consume this Cookie!

For bringing me back to a page I thought I'd left for dead:

Modusoperandi has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

You beautiful bastard. I still don't know if it'll ever get finished, but at least now it's beyond the stub stage.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 16:35, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

It's almost done, methinks. Any opinions would be appreciated before I release it into the wild...I hope it ended up as whatever it was that I was thinking of when I started it.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:30, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Done, and thanks again for pointing me back in the direction of a page with which I'd quickly grown disillusioned.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:00, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

I WANT THOSE BOXES YOU HAVE ON YOUR PAGE!

How do I get those boxes that you have on your page? – Preceding unsigned comment added by Coke and b******* (talk • contribs)

Only "special" people get those..... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

I'm special. . . like all Jerry's kids. . .  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 18:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Those boxes are for people who don't speak in all caps, and who use only one question/exclamation mark. --Sir Zombiebaron 18:14, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Aw, hell. Give the noob a chance. Besides, he probably won't think to check back here for a response. . . At least he didn't tear my user page a new linkhole trying to figure it out.  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 18:26, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

It was fugly, tho.  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 18:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the friendly welcome message, appreciate it. RandomUNWellwisher 23:47, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

I don't usually do this, but

I was so impressed by your AAAAAAAA quality flaming of Slashy that I decided it was worth memorializing your excellent ability in userbox code:

This user is exceptionally good at flaming idiots who desperately deserve it. Their oversized egos are his cordwood.

Great work! I encourage you to apply your considerable skills in this area to spicing up some of the articles here, especially those on the stupider subjects, and of course keeping the idiots with more ego than brains in line.

Once again, great, great work.

--Hrodulf 09:19, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Octuple A! You do me great honor, Sir! I shall endeavor to use these powers for good, or at least evil of an entertaining nature. . . Bwaahaahahahaha!

One day, when we're old and gray and living in the Old Uncyclopedia Veterans' Home, we'll look back at The Great Slashy War of Ought Six and giggle uncontrollably. I know with what I'm smokin' I will. . .   Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 09:36, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Funny coincidence, somewhere in that oversized forum article I posted the following:

"You do realize that a massive Aspie attack on Uncyclopedia would be more grist for the Aspie-humor mill, don't you? We would make an article called "The Great Aspie/Uncyclopedia War of 2006" and detail all the battles, and photoshop pictures of tanks with pictures of other tanks on their side. Ask yourself: is that something you really want to happen? --Hrodulf 15:47, 24 October 2006 (UTC)"

Maybe a little mean, but I do like the Aspergers' tanks that have pictures of other tanks on them. Dunno if anyone will make an article, but that would be another way to mine this incident for something positive for the site.

--Hrodulf 09:48, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I think I got it

See if this code is better:

Code pasted to userpage

Forgot to sign. --Hrodulf 10:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

The Great Aspie War of Ought Six

I think it's coming along nicely. It's amazing to me that Slashy is actually still in Forum:Asperger Syndrome is no laughing matter running his mouth (hm, he's typing, not talking. Hands?) without running his brain (assuming he has one. I think the spinal cord alone would be enough for him). I still want to do another tank picture and if there's any way to make it more AS-offensive for the purposes of pissing off Slashy, that's fine, but I don't have any other specific ideas. I was wondering if you had anything in mind. --Hrodulf 12:31, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

From the "Save the Aspies" forum (you know which one I mean)

O, my people!

>sigh< . . . and so Slashy reiterates the same tired arguments yet again, throwing in bogus legal threats like a barracks lawyer, as if he's got the resources to actually commence legal proceedings. Don't you all get it? He won't be reasoned with, and will accept nothing less than absolute capitulation on our part. Logical, reasonable debate on the issue falls on deaf ears, and only prompts him to more repetition of his unwavering demands and/or rationale. The more you try to meet him halfway, the harder he spouts his immutable rhetoric. If you're not going to abuse him for your own pleasure, or let slip my leash, then quit talking to him before his repetitive dogma fills another page. We're no closer to a resolution than we were 190K ago, and we never will be, since it's clear that resolution is not his desire: He's just a spoiled little boy seeking attention.  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 10:51, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Unfortunately, this is true. He is quite the attention whore. --General Insineratehymn 13:02, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Tooltroll, speaking only for myself, based on this guy's arrogance, contempt for American civil rights, resorting to increasingly bizarre and hysterical attacks upon people who dare to disagree with him and complete failure to acknowledge that he's utterly lost this little debate, let that leash slip. Whatever you come up with isn't enough for this guy. I'd suggest he eat shit, but I don't want to be seen as promoting cannibalism. --Hrodulf 13:12, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

That's your cue. Let him have it and damn what anybody says. This guy richly deserves to suffer for his severe idiocy. --Hrodulf 13:19, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

You might also appreciate reading this swipe I took at our "special friend" Slashy (also posted in the VD forum since he apparently thinks I gave up fighting him just because I don't talk to him any more. What a fucking moron). --Hrodulf 15:58, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

I guess our time playing with Slashy is over

That was a strange five days or so, wasn't it? --Hrodulf 08:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Is the fat lady singing? I thought she was asleep behind me. . . yup, can't miss that ass! Heh. Anyway, has something transpired? Slashy surrender? I've been busy working up an audio version of The Uncyclopedian's Song, so I've been playing with my sequencing software all night and just tweaking the words occasionally. Tomorrow when she's off to work, I'll be able to bellow out the vocal tracks. . . hopefully, it'll be done within the next 24.  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 09:06, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I hope you don't mind but I'm "tweaking" the song a bit...I do have some small experience with G&S. "Some" and "small" being the operative words, but still...--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 09:23, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I don't mind, but don't add syllables! Trust me, I've got the meter worked out to work with an adaptation of the original score. "Posterior" was a beat too long, as was "first-rate."  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 09:29, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Apology on the talk page...--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 09:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I don't think Slashy will surrender, but I think we're past the tipping point where if I were to keep going on and on about Slashy and his obvious faults, people here would start finding me as annoying as Slashy. And maybe they'd be right. Honestly, I had more fun with Col. Swordman than with Slashy anyway. You know what happened there, right? It's classic. --Hrodulf 10:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Yeah. Heh.  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 10:46, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Yep. 0wn3d. --Hrodulf 22:42, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

The Great Aspie War of Ought Six on VFH

29 votes over 4 days; 15+/14-; peaked at +9

Score: +1 Fake Asperger Syndrome sufferers

• N+F. - Sikon 13:18, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• FOR. I sure out Anonymous Aspie is, in fact, Tom Cruise, "YOU DON'T KNOW ASPIE SYNDROME, I DO !!!" --Vosnul 13:36, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• It would be totally immodest of me to vote FOR this. . . if it weren't FOR all the excellent contributions of many others.  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 13:50, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

That can be remedied !. HE IS ALSO FOR! ( Thank me later ! ) -- Vosnul 13:56, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment - ¿Eh?  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 14:01, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• Oh! I get it. I actually did vote, but thanks anywho!  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 14:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• for. a very faithful and very funny chronicle of one of uncyclopedia's greatest and silliest wars. - jack mort | cunt | talk - 14:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• For obvious reasons.--<<>> 14:52, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• FOR!!!! I can't wait to nominate this for 1 of the top 10 articles of 2006! --Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 15:17, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Something this stupid just has to be featured. --Hrodulf 15:22, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against Reminds me of ED drama articles. I am impressed by the level of collaboration on this piece, though. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 16:21, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Out of principle.--The One and Only Czar Yah 16:22, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• For 16:23, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Reluctant against because it's a good article and well-written (and I contributed to it), but it's just too much of an in-joke. Hate to vote against quality, but the feature space should highlight articles that can pull in as many people as possible.--Procopius 16:28, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. But let it wait until I finish my reskin. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 17:16, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. As Procopius, but minus the bit about "contributing".--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:03, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against It's just really not that funny. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 20:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Against. Enegma didnt say enough. This is awful, and overly in-jokey. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 23:17, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For I didn't contribute to the forums, but I read it in its entirety. Damn. Now, that shit is worth featuring. This'll have to do. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Yeah. >sigh< That was some choice Slashy flambé.  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 10:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

• For I didn't contribute in the forumes either, but wow. Anyway, the articles funny, and the quotes were great, I like the way they degenerate into screaming insults.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 04:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• 2. --L 05:23, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Just cuz. Jboyler 19:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against Sorry, I don't mind having a reskin or something for an in-joke like this, but I reckon featured articles should remain accessible to everyone. --Sir Jam 20:45, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. This article fully explains all injokes. --User:Nintendorulez 21:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against, no, just no. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 23:05, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Against. Demeaning to all involved, and if featured, demeaning to all those who have written genuinely good featured articles in the past. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 13:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against - Regardless of whether it is appropriate or not, joking about Aspergers has been done too many times now and is no longer the slightest bit funny. -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against In-jokey, not especially funny and liable to give newcomers the wrong idea about uncyclopedia. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 15:09, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 15:25, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. A good way to put off new users. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 04:40, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Sadly against. Very funny and very well done, but too in-jokey for mine. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 08:44, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Sorry, I don't normally vote against stuff, but I feel this should be kept away from the front page. -- Hindleyite 11:25, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

• Comment - Rc, it's obvious where this is headed. . . Time to put it out of it's misery, yes?  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 16:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - I agree, no way will this ever get featured. -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:13, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

---

Meh. A flufy little piece. . . I never really thought it would see the front page.   Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 11:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

FFS

What did I do? Plus I'm already on the page so I'm moving your vote to it. 12:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

........God I feel stupid at the moment..... that was a good one.... 12:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Oh, the sweet, sweet irony. . . Considering that I first encountered that particular template on your userpage! Bwaahaahahahahaha!!  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 19:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Thought you might be interested to know

It may be a wasted effort, but as a gesture of . . . something I'm trying to rewrite the AS page so that it will be funnier and perhaps Slashy will find something better to do than to troll our site and threaten us.

See User:Wally Burns/Asperger's Syndrome if you want to check it out. Any ideas?

--Hrodulf 09:00, 8 November 2006 (UTC)