Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive163

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.

Mr winkler is COOL

Keep	Keep. - This was protected some time ago, I don't think the cabal approve its demise.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:27, 13 November 2008 (UTC) No no. We're not starting this again. ~ 18:07, 13 November 2008 (UTC) K33P Aren't we NOT supposed to delete in-jokes? Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 18:21, 13 November 2008 (UTC) No Mr N 19:47, Nov 13 Thank God, I was starting to worry that we might never have another bout of Winkler drama. Keep. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:54, Nov 13 Keep. it was kept 3 times before, its one of those protected crap in-joke articles.--Mnbvcxz 21:48, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete.. In-joke based on an in-joke. Plus it's a stub. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:25, Nov 13 Delete.. What? The cabal doesnt exist --Nytrospawn 17:48, 13 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 20:35, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Kept by vote count and also Invalid for lack of a VFD template. lol -RA HB 22:37, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Jacko

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Random 2006 stub, terrible--Sycamore (Talk) 16:57, 13 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:18, Nov 13 Delete. Mr N 19:48, Nov 13 Delete. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 20:36, 13 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - Unfunny and doesn't even sorta approach making sense.--Mnbvcxz 21:35, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Davetopia

Keep
Delete	Delete.. It's vanity disguised as a small armadillo. --Asahatter (annoy) 22:19, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. I thought this was a new article but no its crap from 2005 that managed to survive 3 years of hell here. Those Crappy Orphan Articles are he reason why they have the Random Page Link. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[block me!]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 08:01, 13 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. -- How do these things last so long? BlueYonder - CONTACT Delete. Crap. --UU - natter 16:43, Nov 13 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:00, 13 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:17, Nov 13
Comments

Consett

Keep	Keep Too new for me to vote anything other than keep. It's got a {{fix}} on it. That means that if it's not fixed after 30 days it may be deleted anyway. No need to bring things like this to VFD. Mr N 20:13, Nov 12 Also keep. Plus, you just reviewed it. It's at least common courtesy to let people have a little time after a review to see if they do anything about it. It's better to watchlist it for a while and see if it gets made betterer, then bring it here if it doesn't. Except, in this case, it's best to leave it to the fix template as MrN says. --UU - natter 20:25, Nov 12 Speedy Keep per not signing the nom vote Read rule #3 above. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[block me!]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 07:59, 13 November 2008 (UTC) Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:01, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. – Preceding unsigned comment added by I like cheese (talk • contribs)
Comments	Kept......FOR NOW. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:56, Nov 13

Madagascar (film)

Keep	Keep. Invalid nom. 1. It's got a construction tag on. 2. You didn't add a VFD tag to it. Welcome to VFD, BY, have a quick look at the rules before nomming, OK? --UU - natter 16:41, Nov 13
Delete	Delete -- It's basically empty, and what there is is practically an incarnation of the Anti-Funny. BlueYonder - CONTACT
Comments	As the poopsmith said. ~ 16:43, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Euroipods Crusade

Keep	Keep This stays. Mr N 20:15, Nov 12 Keep. Absolutely not random. When I first joined here, the whole Euroipods Crusade bit was one of the funniest arguments I'd ever read, and it made me stick around. Keep it for the memories of those long since past, however unpleasant said memories may be. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:37, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Speedy Keep This article is not eligible for VFD per the page being placed in the In Jokes Category by an Admin. See the line on the top section of the VFD page: "This also applies to Uncyclopedia In jokes (see: In-Jokes)." Also the article is preaty funny and very well worth keeping. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[block me!]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 07:56, 13 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. While I've never really found this funny, it is undeniably an important piece of Uncyclopedia history. pillow talk 09:47, 13 November 2008 (UTC) Kelp If you delete this, UNCYCLOPEDIA DIES. Or dies more than it usually does. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 09:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete.. Hella random. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 19:44, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 19:55, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 09:57, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Straight Into Compton

Keep
Delete	Delete. Essentially, it's a list. It's about a fictional Weird Al album, it's random and it just gets crapper as it goes on. An hangover from 2006, not really edited much, and not linked from anywhere so won't be missed. --UU - natter 16:04, Nov 12 Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:21, Nov 12 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:11, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Mr N 20:10, Nov 12 Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:34, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Emoticonia

Keep
Delete	Delete. 2005cruft. Stubby, with sexcruft, nothing particularly interesting going on, no links to it and a general air of forgettableness about it. --UU - natter 14:37, Nov 12 Sexcruft. Yecch. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:19, Nov 12 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:12, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 19:51, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:34, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Sergei Dragunov

Keep
Delete	Delete. Short, listy gamecruft bollocks. Not linked to yet again, and infinitely forgettable. --UU - natter 11:55, Nov 12 Delete • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:15, Nov 12 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:13, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 19:50, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:33, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Rakiah

Keep
Delete	Delete. Patent bollocks/vanity (as suggested by Hindleyite on the talk page) originally created at WP by some bored teenagers, and then brought here. No funny, no point, no links to it, no reason to keep. --UU - natter 11:33, Nov 12 Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:14, Nov 12 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:13, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 19:49, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Who? What? Mr N 20:02, Nov 12
Comments

Rahzark

Keep
Delete	Delete. Another one from 2005 with elements of random, a strong suspicion of vanity, and nothing worthwhile that I can see. --UU - natter 11:27, Nov 12 Vanity • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:11, Nov 12 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:13, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Mr N 20:04, Nov 12 Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Invalid No VFD template. Better luck next time. -RA HB 21:59, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

PCMCIA

Keep
Delete	Delete. Old stub from 2005 that I see nothing good in, and isn't linked from anywhere and hasn't been touched since 2006. --UU - natter 11:07, Nov 12 Delete • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:10, Nov 12 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:13, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 19:47, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Mr N 19:58, Nov 12
Comments

Governor general

Keep
Delete	Delete. Hasn't been edited in over a year, and while creative, contains no humor - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 03:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Further proof of the rule that inordinately long numbers are a sure sign of a crap article. --UU - natter 11:10, Nov 12 Delete • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:08, Nov 12 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:14, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Mr N 20:05, Nov 12
Comments

Boston Red Sox

Keep
Delete	Delete. Its incredibly random, and therefore, completely unfunny. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 03:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Also redlinky and listy, but yeah, it's crap. --UU - natter 11:05, Nov 12 Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:08, Nov 12 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:14, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. We need an article about Boston Red Sox, but this article is not about Boston Red Sox. Mr N 20:00, Nov 12
Comments

Gheb

Keep
Delete	Delete. Copy/paste of an old version of a WP page, apparently. Random, sexcruft, unfunny as well. --UU - natter 14:57, Nov 12 Sexcruft. Nasty and unfunny. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:20, Nov 12 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:12, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Not much to say, really. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 17:17, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Mr N 20:08, Nov 12
Comments

Official iPod Clone

Keep
Delete	Delete. It's just a list. A crap list. --UU - natter 11:03, Nov 12 Delete -- And how. BlueYonder - CONTACT Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:09, Nov 12 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:14, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 19:46, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Soma Cruz

Keep
Delete	Delete. Random gamecruft. --UU - natter 08:26, Nov 11 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:08, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 03:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Delete • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:08, Nov 12 This is highly random stuff, but not in any sense 'good'. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 17:19, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Scandenopia

Keep
Delete	Delete. It's been here since 2006, but nothing links to it, and there's been precious little done to it. And what's there is short, listy, odd and unfunny. --UU - natter 09:14, Nov 11 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Yuk--Asahatter (annoy) 23:31, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 03:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

The Bright And Shiny Cult

Keep
Delete	Delete. 2006 oddity that I just don't see any point in keeping. Anyone else see anything in it? --UU - natter 08:33, Nov 11 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Asahatter (annoy) 23:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 03:30, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Slut Brigade

Keep
Delete	Delete. Short 'n' shit. --UU - natter 08:30, Nov 11 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. The title's got some potential, but the concept is just impossible to write something good at. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Asahatter (annoy) 23:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 03:31, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Smithtown

Keep
Delete	Delete. Short, odd, kinda random and unfunny towncrufty thing from 2006. Get rid. --UU - natter 08:28, Nov 11 Delete -- Indeed; the lack of pictures and poor grammar do nothing for its random nature. BlueYonder - CONTACT Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Asahatter (annoy) 23:33, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Conspiracy

Keep	Keep. ~ 17:25, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. --UU - natter 11:45, Nov 10 Keep. It's in one of my articles • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:37, Nov 10 Keep has a purpose & its one tons of articles.--Mnbvcxz 01:59, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Keep -- We definitley need something to represent this, and this seems to do the job. BlueYonder - CONTACT Keep. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. - Not funny. Does nothing for articles except clutter them. pillow talk 17:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Um? Mr N 18:41, Nov 9 Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 23:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Template:Cold

I like it. Don't ask me why. ~ 17:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Is this like a Super Keep, where your vote goes even higher than the keep box? pillow talk 17:13, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Gives me five extra points. ~ 17:25, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

You broke the fourth wall. How Pythonesque of you. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 17:53, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Unfunny. Does not improve articles that it is transcluded into. At all. pillow talk 17:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. I give this one a frosty reception. I look at the articles it's on and I think... "Yea, someone slapped that on there cos they thought it was the right thing to do, but it's making the article look bad" so it gets the cold shoulder from me. Mr N 17:58, Nov 9 Delete • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:36, Nov 10 Delete. Happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter 11:34, Nov 10 Delete Only on one user page, and that page is a template whore, and its stupid and unfunny.--Mnbvcxz 01:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Delete -- I agree, it's basic, unfunny and redundant. And by the way, this is my first vote here. Yaaay! BlueYonder - CONTACT
Comments

Friki

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Do I need to explain why? Asahatter (annoy) 22:33, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Delete -RA HB 23:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Delete Mr N 02:08, Nov 11 Delete article needs to be about something fewer English speaking persons would be aware of, and shorter too.--Mnbvcxz 02:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Crap. --UU - natter 08:24, Nov 11
Comments

Seductive space boob

Keep	Keep. This was funny. Why? I have no idea. But it was. No, it doesn't make sense. But... there's something about it. A bizzarre, twelve-year-old-like charm to it. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Keep --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:53, 5 November 2008 (UTC) K33P If only for referring to the Eye of Sauron as a "Giant Space Pussy" Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 20:18, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. - This was just a bad idea from the start. pillow talk 15:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Grues, Norris, randomity... This would, I submit, be a great entry for ?pedia. But here? Nah. --UU - natter 22:42, Nov 4 Delete. - Gratuitous boobage, Norris, Wilde, the Great Dildo Faggins, random dates, Microsoft, and a title that just screams "Do I really need to read the article to know its VFD?"--Mnbvcxz 03:18, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:46, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Delete Nice try, but still epic fail. Lucario! 18:28, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Delete Er, what?Asahatter (annoy) 12:46, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:31, Nov 10
Comments

Love Possibly

Keep
Delete	Delete. OK, this has been here since 2006, it seems, and I'm at a loss to understand why. I'm gonna go out on a limb and say it's vanity, the content, plus an edit made today and the talk page comment, plus a few googles, seem to bear this out. And it's not funny. And I'd like to see this go, but I place it before the community to see if you disagree, or if someone knows something I don't. --UU - natter 15:52, Nov 10 Delete. - I thought the same thing--Sycamore (Talk) 15:54, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - yep, it's vanity. A quick Google or 2 ~~makes you go blind~~ brings up the "stars'" Fecebook profiles etc. Asahatter (annoy) 16:53, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:41, Nov 10 Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:06, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Bean Machine

Keep
Delete	Delete. Random and odd. Created in August, not touched since. Not linked from anywhere, and did I mention it's random and odd? --UU - natter 15:13, Nov 10 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:14, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Asahatter (annoy) 16:54, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:41, Nov 10 Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

O:

Keep
Delete	Delete - Unfunny nonsense with little improvement in 2 years Asahatter (annoy) 12:42, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:15, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Yeah, that's crap. --UU - natter 15:21, Nov 10 Delete • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:41, Nov 10 Memes. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Microsoftland

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Lousy Microsoft article, poor throughout, little progress since 2005, also stubbih--Sycamore (Talk) 18:46, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Short, random and really quite crap. --UU - natter 11:51, Nov 10 Delete Asahatter (annoy) 12:43, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Delete • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:40, Nov 10 Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:01, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Gazelle

Keep	Keep. I kinda like it, in an odd way. I certainly like the idea. If it goes, I'll have a copy in my userspace please. I may have a tinker if I get time. --UU - natter 11:48, Nov 10 Keep • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:39, Nov 10 Strong keep. Despite the awful formatting, I think this is funnier than at least two-thirds of the stuff on the site. With a little cleanup and expansion, I bet UU could turn this around into a feature. pillow talk 17:56, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. To tell you the truth, I kind of like it as is. Though a picture would be nice. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:00, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. - Poor IP article little progress, crap writing, lame concept and nothing that seems worthwhile to keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:04, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.Mr N 18:34, Nov 9
Comments	Keept -RA HB 22:26, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Template:California warning

Keep	Weak keep Its in reference to the warning labels on some products, which state "This product is known by the state of California to cause cancer, ect" Basically, its a weaselly warning label due to different regulations between states.--Mnbvcxz 19:11, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 19:38, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Very Strong Keep For Fucks Sake I use that template on my page. Also this template makes fun of a Law that requires stuff that contains certain chemicals to stat its known to cause cancer in California. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[block me!]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 23:09, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Vague keep. Eh. At least it's not big and massively ugly. --UU - natter 11:26, Nov 10 Keep.. Funny but true, my mobile home park has a plaque with the gist of this template written on it. I've now lost both my prostates to cancer. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:34, Nov 10
Delete	Delete. - I'm guessing this is a reference to something in California politics in late 2005. It isn't funny now. Let's lose it. pillow talk 18:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Naa. Mr N 20:10, Nov 8 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:58, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Keept -RA HB 22:26, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Grand Theft Auto: London

Keep
Delete	Delete. - desperatly bad game cruft, never good and shows no promise of ever improving.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:40, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Mr N 18:43, Nov 9' Delete. Terrible. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:01, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. As bad a GTA article as I've seen, which says it all. --UU - natter 11:50, Nov 10 Delete Asahatter (annoy) 12:44, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:40, Nov 10
Comments

Natalya Ivanova

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Calling this one a "mess" would be charitable. pillow talk 15:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Delete, with an explanation. Alright, mate, Hype and I are both assholes. Problem is, there's no redeeming bit of this article. It's senseless and random. I mean, do you really like it? Reading over it, do you think it's super funny? I'm not sure what you're talking about half the time. You can do better. I had articles deleted too, and looking back, it was for excellent reasons. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:23, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Or shift into SWJS's userspace, where he can improve it at his leisure. It's massively random, needs a lot of the pointless sexcruft removing, and generally needs a lot of attention. SWJS: you can try putting it up for pee review, and see what advice you get, but I doubt you'll get much help fixing it up unless you find another DAH nerd who doubles as a decent writer. That said, good luck with it! --UU - natter 22:31, Nov 4 Delete - per the others--Sycamore (Talk) 10:37, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:31, Nov 10
Comments	Comment. - This was my first article. Yes I know it sucks. Hell I suck. But the other article I created, which was BETTER than this one, and got a higher review score than this one, was deleted first. Instead of being an asshole and placing it under VFD, maybe you can try and help fix it up? --SWJS: The All Knowing Destroy All Humans! Nerd(Cortex Scan) 21:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC) I'd be more than happy to help you with this if you want, but there's a procedure. First, put a copy in your userspace, or, if it's already deleted, you mention - here or on an admin's talkpage - that you'd like an admin to put a copy in your userspace. They always do. Then, you work on it. If you want help, you submit it to Pee Review. If you want me personally to go help with it, you leave a message on my talk page. Finally, when it's lookin' good, you move it back into mainspace. It will probably get deleted in the meantime, but if it's out of commission for a week or two, who cares? It'll be around for years after that. Of course, only take the time to do all this if you're really committed to this subject. Otherwise, it might be a better idea just to write another article. Good luck! pillow talk 22:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Conan O'Brien

Keep	Very Weak Keep I suggest leaving the article up until some one can do a complete re-write, sense its a biography of a well known person.--Mnbvcxz 23:22, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. - This is some absolutely unredeemable shit. pillow talk 15:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Ah jeez - that's random. I can see the need for a Conan article. But a blank canvas is probably a better starting point than this wall o' crap. --UU - natter 22:18, Nov 4 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Delete Mr N 00:27, Nov 8 Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:30, Nov 10
Comments	Abstain. I would say delete but it appears that someone would love to rewrite this. If the page is deleted it would create soo much red tape when tring to recreate it as it would end up on QVFD no matter how good it is, due to the VFD. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[block me!]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 04:50, 9 November 2008 (UTC) I really don't think it would create too much red tape. Solid Snake was deleted about 50 times and finally the page was protected. I wrote an article in userspace and asked an admin to unprotect the page, and that was pretty much all the red tape involved... pillow talk 17:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Generic war

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Meme riddled random 2006 stub, little progress. too vauge to be good place to start from--Sycamore (Talk) 17:56, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Mr N 18:33, Nov 9 Delete. Short, confused, little to no point, and not funny. --UU - natter 11:46, Nov 10 Delete Asahatter (annoy) 12:44, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Delete • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:39, Nov 10
Comments

Template:Conspiracy/Biblecode

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Appears on only one page; it's the same as the pointless Template:Conspiracy, except it says "OSCAR WILDE HEADS" in red letters, which is only semi-coherent (I guess he "heads" the conspiracy?). Let's get rid of it. pillow talk 17:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - Unfunny and spam, with a little "???" on top. --iseditor.user ^Comments/_Criticism 17:57, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Was only on one page, so I paste the code in, and now it's on none. We can delete this now. Mr N 18:39, Nov 9 Delete. Happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter 11:45, Nov 10 Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:38, Nov 10
Comments

Template:Confusing

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Not funny, and hardly used at all. pillow talk 17:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. -Mr N 18:31, Nov 9 Delete. Happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter 11:37, Nov 10 Delete Asahatter (annoy) 12:45, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:37, Nov 10
Comments

Template:Chickenhead

Keep	Keep. per rule against deleting userspace templates.--Mnbvcxz 01:27, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. - Unfunny and basically unused. pillow talk 01:14, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. ~~what he said.--Mnbvcxz 19:06, 8 November 2008 (UTC)~~ Delete. Mr N 20:12, Nov 8 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:57, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Get rid, it's pointless. Put the code on userpages if people want it. --UU - natter 11:32, Nov 10 Delete it! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:35, Nov 10
Comments	Abstain. This template should not belong on the main space as it only links to 2 user pages and a template directory. Therefore I suggest it should be userspaced. BTW I fail to get the joke on this one. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[block me!]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 23:12, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Template:Capitalists

Keep	KEEP ON USERPAGES. Just as a side note: as we do this for templates, VFD should serve as a way of cleaning up our mainspace articles. The "No Tampering With Userpages" should always apply here, and I'd just like to state that right now: I'll probably say it again in the HyperVFD forum topic, as well. Otherwise, delete. I'm just making sure that this is noticeable. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 23:22, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. - Ugly clutter. It certainly looks terrible on United States of America. pillow talk 18:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. ~~- An advisory template should actually warn the reader, not clutter up space.--Mnbvcxz 19:09, 8 November 2008 (UTC)~~ keep changed per rule against deleting userspace templates. Dé¬é†é Nöt funny. Lucario! 20:02, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Mr N 20:11, Nov 8 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:58, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. It's teh ugherlee. But keep in userspace by pasting in code per Modus's comment in the forum. (Even though that sounds like a lot of work - fire up MrN's bot!) --UU - natter 11:28, Nov 10 Delete • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:35, Nov 10
Comments	Abstain. Meh it looks bad on the mainspace pages just remove them from their but keep them on the user pages and user space this template. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[block me!]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 23:15, 8 November 2008 (UTC) I'll just subst the templates on the userpages, as I normally do. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:55, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Horiemon

Keep
Delete	Delete. - 2005 stub, little progress and poor throughout. Random also--Sycamore (Talk) 18:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Delete - per above, random topic, gratuitous unfunny pr0n references.--Mnbvcxz 19:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Delete - Yep, this is not good. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 19:37, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Mr N 20:13, Nov 8 Delete. what they say Asahatter (annoy) 08:07, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Communists

Keep	This is a classic one. And yes, classic is a good enough reason for me. ~ 17:25, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. Classic, comrade. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 17:54, 9 November 2008 (UTC) K33P Mayfair would kill you. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 17:59, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Regretful Keep It's just linked from so many places. I'm sure as heck not going to remove that many links. Mr N 18:00, Nov 9 Keep. what they said.--Mnbvcxz 02:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. - I see way too much of this one around here. It's ugly and unfunny. pillow talk 17:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Keept -RA HB 04:52, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Mai∩ Page

Keep	Very Strong Keep as I still stand on my rationale from the previous VFD on this article. per http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive93#Mai.E2.88.A9_Page ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[block me!]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 11:30, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. I think we're fishing here for things to delete. Delete this, and you might as well start cleaning out the various babel versions. If we're so disturbed about this, I'll move it to babel. But seriously, I think we should concentrate on bad articles rather than those random bits that are present all throughout the site which contributes so much to its wackiness. ~ 11:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. There is much worse stuff on the wiki. Like Mordillo, it looks like some of this is fishing for deletion. You could probably find 3 articles worse than this by hitting the random page button 10 times.--Mnbvcxz 00:25, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Keep, for the sense of history. I was there, man. I was there. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:32, 9 November 2008 (UTC) K∑∑p - I like this page. --iseditor.user ^Comments/_Criticism 18:00, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. - This was created a few years back by Nintendorulez - It was also on VFD before. A bit pointless and unfunny, not something thats needed.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC) \|)∑Ł∑†∑ – ∩ø† ƒüññÿ. Lucario! 19:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Pointless Pants Oh yea baby. Guess who's back, MrN's back, MrN's back, MrN's back. ummmm - "Shut the fuck up MrN". Oh. Yea, OK then... Mr N 20:38, Nov 7 Pointless... Shirts. See what I just did there? Yeah, I'm witty. I know. You don't have to tell me. Really, you don't. You're sweet for saying it, though. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 00:57, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Pointless whatever. --UU - natter 08:59, Nov 8 \|)∑Ł∑†∑ Replacing letters with symbols is so hilarious, especially when you don't change anything else --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 03:33, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	No clear winner. Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:59, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Do Not Read

Keep	Delete most of the Templates on the page and then we will have a good article as I am voting Keep. here. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[block me!]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 10:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. - Can't see the humor in this. pillow talk 23:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - Its just not funny.--Mnbvcxz 23:34, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:12, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Delete Unfunny. Lucario! 19:16, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - Correct. Don't read it. --Simon Brown (Talk) 20:13, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Meta articles need to be done well. This isn't. —–Sir Heerenveen, KUN UotM RotM VFH (talk), 9/11 21:41
Comments	Comment.I went ahead and removed some of the excessive templates on the page that I felt ruined the quality of the page per the edit at [1]. The excessive template spam was probably a reason for VFD here. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[block me!]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 10:42, 4 November 2008 (UTC)