This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read.
@MK: he was talking about the redirect --DameFishonskatesCUN 16:09, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
Yeahhhh, I just figured the article it directed to covered Walter White quite well, thus deserving the redirect. I think an article on him would be hilarious, but at the same time it would just be yet another recap of BB, with a bunch of goofy "I am the one who knocks" jokes slapped on it. LucynaK 16:22, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
Kept Can't believe this one was necessary smh. MrXblow me 23:33, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
@Gergdown: isn't voting this kinda useless? the article already had the "merge" template, so there's no need to vote in VFD what was already decided πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 15:02, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! no need to merge this when it's so stubby and has barely any content. plus, I don't think it would fit with the joke of the other article. I think it'll be easier to just delete it fully and then redirect to the other one. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 15:05, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
Comments
@DaniPine3: This nom is null and void since said article is now a redirect. π gergdownπ(talk) βοΈ 17:06, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
@Gergdown:k. gonna archibe this soon. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 17:09, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
refirected. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 02:38, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Userfy. There's barely any stuff on here, it looks pretty ugly, and the Terraria articles that are linked are user-space. π gergdownπ(talk) βοΈ 17:05, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
Comments
@Gergdown: that's because it was originally in userspace, but L10nM4st3r brought it to templatespace for some reason. I too agree it should've stayed in userspace. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 17:09, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
ugh let me explain... Similar humor is littered throughout this entire site, and seems to be acceptable there, but not here? I see the argument that it won't bring about any good, but I don't think it will cause harm either... its not going to encourage something that is clearly against one of the few strict rules here. 1st Amendment DOES apply here, but remember... It doesn't protect you from the consequences of your actions. I'll put you in the woodchipper myself and THEN call authorities after :3 LucynaK 14:46, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
Keep.. We have articles on niggers, faggots, wogs, crackers, but we draw the line at having joke user boxes.Oh, Kurtz,you can do stupid things! 20:05, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
Eww! Yes, even if it seems to be a joke, it might encourage actual pedophiles. --DameFishonskatesCUN 18:47, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
Half delete. 17:48, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
Comments
IDK what side to take. removing this template would result in a ton of broken links, but it might encourage actual pedos.Boner. Napalm Yankeesees! 14:48, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Maybe subst it on the userpages that have it? --DameFishonskatesCUN 14:56, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Delete this stoned nonsense. if this is about a wiki religion, why is it talking about looney tunes??? πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 11:59, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
Delete. From what i can best tell this is more of a list of politicians the author doesn't like than an actual article that tries to be, you know, funny. 23:47, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
Terminate the Article's Command. The writer was butthurt when Nancy Pelosi didn't win, thus proving trump derangement syndrome is still a valid thing.Oh, Kurtz,you can do stupid things! 00:22, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
Dispose Of or Userfy. Its not the worst thing on here by any means, nor even the most offensive, but offensive can at least be funny. This feels more like directed dislike of certain people. Seeing the comment, it could also just be rewritten/cut down, as there is an interesting concept to explore in the body text. LucynaK 18:21, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
I started the article. It is more about providing a place to satirise lesser known non western politicians and celebtrities then it is about shaming western politicians I don't like. Can't deny that is part of it though. Both Pelosi and McConnel or on the list....
I agree the individual entries are not terribly funny, but the main body text is mildy amusing I hope? β Preceding unsigned comment added by Noof al Maadeed (talk β’ contribs)
It's not that bad. At worst should be userfied, not deleted. Definitely has humor and potential. MrXblow me 23:42, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
userfied. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 18:26, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
This is a joke nomination to VFD This nomination should not be taken seriously. Or do take it seriously. Whatever you feel like, we don't judge. Okay, we do judge, but we do our best to hide it. But I guess our best wasn't good enough, 'cause here we are back where we were before...
Score: 1
Keep (3)
Strong keep. We must make sure that the Yankees-Sox war continues. GO YANKEES! π gergdownπ(talk) βοΈ 22:37, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
Delete. this is like a meth head desperately trying to explain the plot of Armageddon but also they're a meth head so it comes out like whatever the fuck this is LieutenantGammaHere, Friend, have some meth. 17:08, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Delete. but keep that image. SirTurb0-Sunrisede laBoston 17:14, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Huff. 09:47, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
Comments
huffed. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 19:28, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
Meh. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 20:39, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Delete. Its sort of funny, but also sorta really not a good article. Would make a better UnScript if anything LucynaK 16:36, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Comments
I want this for my article trench. 15:23, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
I also want this for alula's article trench --DameFishonskatesCUN 15:31, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
What is Alula's article trench? MrXblow me 22:06, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
@MrX: It's Alula's stockpile of ICU'd articles that are "pretty funny" to her. They range from good concepts with mediocre execution to bnuuy. You can read them here. π gergdownπ(talk) βοΈ 01:39, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Ah ok, good stuff, thanks. MrXblow me 23:43, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Really short and humor-free UnGame, translated (poorly) from Korean. I've played the first game before; it was almost decent. This sequel, on the other hand... it ain't worth keepin'. OαΓΆααααHey, that tickles!(vandalize my talk page) 19:31, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
Terminate with extreme prejudice. Yet another crappy article about a fictional country, with nothing to stand out from the other crappy articles about fictional countries. OαΓΆααααHey, that tickles!(vandalize my talk page) 20:30, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
WTF? 09:42, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
Delete. its like Cherbia but somehow less funny LucynaK 04:27, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Meh. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 13:31, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Comments
huffed. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 14:03, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Userfy. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 13:31, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Comments
Abstain. If this DOES get deleted, just userfy it in my userspace. The history must know about Wikicreator2562 and his Cherbian antics! (Also, this is my article, that's why I'm abstaining...) π gergdownπ(talk) βοΈ 20:41, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
Starting an article trench of your own, are you, Gerg? --DameFishonskatesCUN 20:43, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
One Retard to rule them all, One Retard to find them, One Retard to bring them all and in the darkness write them.Oh, Kurtz,you can do stupid things! 14:06, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
JFK Assassination Pride Flag. Yeah no, this isn't a good article at all. 09:45, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
Nuke. I don't think i need to explain why. 00:49, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE AND KERKILL! and on today's episode of "How hasn't this been QVFD'd already"... πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 02:23, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Deploy MOAB! if that image is a potatochop and not just stolen from an actual game, i want it. If not, it can go fuck itself. The article is like 10 lines, not even worthy of living in a sandbox. LucynaK 19:37, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
It's shit. pillow talk 02:31, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Comments
just a reminder that if Fisher Price was made today the power hungry mods would qvfd it Oh, Kurtz,you can do stupid things! 18:07, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
in-jokes don't become in-jokes because of one person/authority/admin/IP/admin IP, it takes a village to raise a meme --DameFishonskatesCUN 21:41, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Delete. You know what? This doesn't even deserve a merge. π gergdownπ(talk) βοΈ 23:30, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Support comparing Netanyahu with Hitler isn't a bad idea for satire, but it's too on-the-nose to be funny. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 23:35, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Nuke. 09:49, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
Mustard. well well well, looks like somebody's sandbox escaped containment... LucynaK 19:40, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
WTF? this is incredibly short and nonsensical. somehow hasn't been QVFD'd aleady. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 01:33, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
Burninate! 09:50, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
Barnacle dick. k LucynaK 19:41, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
yeah obviously no one's gonna miss this pillow talk 02:30, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Let it burn, let it burn, let it burn! Had this website been as active now as it was in 2006, this article would have been deleted almost immediately. OαΓΆααααHey, that tickles!(vandalize my talk page) 02:38, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Comments
huffed. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 14:03, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
NAPALM. AI slop. Hard to believe, still, it was featured. Lets vow to never make another AI slop article like this one featured again. Oh, Kurtz,you can do stupid things! 13:24, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
WTF? how the FUCK was this featured? I'm fine with AI being used to help with an outline or whatever lazy people use it for, but damn... this is word for word from the ol' Chat Gee Pee Tee... and per Fish, it isn't remotely funny, which is wild because AI can actually make steal funny content, so they must have intentionally set the humor mode to "suck". LucynaK 13:32, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
Agreed. Like what I did with William Henry Harrison, I used AI to generate a garbage speech similar to the one he actually gave, but then manually tweaked in an attempt to make it funnier. Pretty much to do the boring, tedious part. But I didn't just lazily make it all AI without prejudice, like the writer evidently did with this article. OranguTang94(GoBills anyways!) 23:16, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
Shoot 'em out back, Sheriff! Is this the first time a featured article has been deleted? Even though I have a more tolerable stance towards AI, in that it has to be used properly and not indiscriminately, this one's just AI slop. OranguTang94(GoBills anyways!) 22:59, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. if this VFD succeds, this'd be the first featured article to get deleted in Uncyclopedia history. well, the second if you count African American/racist, but that one's still around, so it doesn't count. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 00:01, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment 2: i need to test how the DPL feature thingies react to this being deleted, so to any admins (especially you, Dani): please don't delete this before i give the go-ahead. 22:36, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
@Alula: delete it immediately, you said? πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 23:09, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
no 23:09, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 23:13, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
Ok test done: looks like we won't have any issues. Also, huffed. With extreme prejudice, obviously. 15:00, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Strong keep. a monkey might be an ape, but an ape doesn't necessarily have to be a monkey. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 23:46, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
winnie the boo(b)! ehhh, it's an odd one alright, but already has a cleanup tag. If edited, it'll be ok I think. If no one wants to clean it OR it's still trash after, then I'll change this vote. LucynaK 14:05, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Strong keep. This was created three days ago. And also, it already has a cleanup tag. 14:48, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Meh. this article is all over the place. when I first saw it I thought it was some IP cruft cooked up in 5 minutes, only to see this article has existed since 2011 and it has always looked like this. If not deleted, this article needs severe cleanup. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 13:14, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
It STINKS! formatted by a drunkard, and written by an arkham asylum inmate LucynaK 14:08, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Strong keep. This is our equivalent of Wikipedia's LTA page. Flammable's Office is for documenting active editing restrictions and the block reasons for certain permabanned users. Those two things are completely different from each other and each serve their own purposes. Also, this is, in fact, currently active. 21:00, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
Strong keep. UN:LSD and UN:OFFICE are for two different things, afaik. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 22:36, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
Keep. per alula and danipine --DameFishonskatesCUN 23:11, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
WTF? πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 01:20, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Napalm. AHAHAHAHAHAHHA! REPEATING THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AGAIN IS FUNNY AND HILARIOUS AND HAS NEVER BEEN BEFORE!Ever.Boner. Napalm Yankeesees! 14:25, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
BASH ITS SKULL IN! I know, that's supposed to be DNA or something, but the article never really seems to explain why we are downloading DNA. An article about genetically modifying yourself, or someone else, or attempting to transform your computer into a living organism, could be funny though. OαΓΆααααHey, that tickles!(vandalize my talk page) 16:20, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
bleh OR, or...Userfy. Adobe DNA is a real thing... the genexa platform from (infosys?) decodes data (the DNA) from customers for marketing slop purposes. Yeah, the joke here is that you're "downloading" the chemical base code that makes up someone's DNA, but it doesn't make sense thanks to Adobe DNA being an actual thing already. If it were to stay, maybe change the look of it so it more closely represents a shitty webpage from that time period, complete with annoying popups? idk. I get the feeling a lot of articles use this same style of 'dated' humor, and its just more of an older generation joke we don't quite 'get'. LucynaK 16:23, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
Move to Illogicopedia. 03:59, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
Comments
@GlitchyZorua: @Gergdown: please explain the joke which seems I'm not getting. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 03:07, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
@DaniPine3: It's kinda similar to the articles in Template:Nonsense, except there's a lot more actual stuff in it. The "CCTGCAC" stuff is DNA code. Basically, you're downloading DNA through a shitty website. The joke could've been done more effectively, but right now, it ain't that bad. π gergdownπ(talk) βοΈ 14:31, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
@Gergdown: I still don't get the whole "downloading DNA" thing. It seems to me a tad nonsensical. And this website already has many nonsensical things. Maybe this'd fit Illogiclopedia better. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 14:37, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
@DaniPine3: Yeah, good idea. Whether this gets keeped or not, I'm 100% porting this to Illogiclopedia. π gergdownπ(talk) βοΈ 14:39, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
@Gergdown: You STUPID DUMBASSARY USER! How do you not know the proper way to speak the English language, Gerg? As we all know, the correct way of spelling kept is kept!!! Obviously not keeped!!! In fact, since you said that, not only have you offended me, but the entire history of the Anglo-Saxon language chain, Gerg. SirTurb0-Sunrisede laBoston 12:50, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
@Turb0-Sunrise: You STUPID DUMBASSARY USER! How do you not know the proper way to speak the English language, Turb0? As we all know, the correct way of spelling keeped is keeped!!! Obviously not kept!!! In fact, since you said that, not only have you offended me, but the entire history of the Anglo-Saxon language chain, Turb0. π gergdownπ(talk) βοΈ 14:02, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Awww wTools made me mess up the template. Why would wTools do this to me?!? π gergdownπ(talk) βοΈ 14:03, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
@Gergdown:You STUPID DUMBASSARY USER! How do you not know the proper way to speak the English language, Gerg? As we all know, the correct way of spelling Illogicopedia is Illogicopedia!!! Obviously not Illogiclopedia!!! In fact, since you said that, not only have you offended me, but the entire history of the Anglo-Saxon language chain, Gerg. --DameFishonskatesCUN 18:54, 26 January 2026 (UTC)