Uncyclopedia:VFH/Why?:Don't You have a Girlfriend Yet?

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Why?:Don't You have a Girlfriend Yet? (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Why?:Don't You have a Girlfriend Yet?	Score: 11 Pieces of furniture dropped on parents.
Nominated by:	SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 22:02 3 August 2008
For: 20.5	Self Nom and For, Ok well I got it peed and have taken the advice I think is relevant to what I wanted to do with the article. Personally I think this is one of my best pieces. Feel free to disagree. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 22:02 3 August 2008 Absolutely f♥r. Nice work, Orian. Your recent triumvirate of hilarity has been most impressive and, in this voter's opinion, sets you up for a possible WotM in the very near future. Keep it up. sirsysrq @ 22:24 Aug 3 For. A good read. I'm not too fond of the anecdotal articles much, but this one seems to be an exception. Nice work. DeadlyKittensSPEAK! 00:17, August 4 2008 For Very good article, similar in style to Insomnia. Mr. Orian here has a very distinctive style. - [08:53 4 August] Sir FSt Don Yettie For, I'm looking AT you. — Mgr. Nacky (talk) 10:55, 4 August 2008 (UTC)  For. Rt Hon W E Gladstone MP GOM | Converse | 11:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC) For and echoing SysRq in terms of the improvement of funny - this is a darkly humourous, sinister, gothic piece in the way that can only be achieved by watching the Care Bears Movie on bad acid. - Guybles CUN 12:59, 4 August 2008 (UTC) Nope, High School Musical, whilst sober. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 13:11 4 August 2008 For Thought it was a more funny story than i've seen on this site up till now. 5 days now.-- Altair-the Eagle (talk to me) 22:04, 4 August 2008 (UTC) It took me a long tome to make up my mind about this, but for. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 11:31, 5 August 2008 (UTC) For -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:21, 5 Aug For While I agree with a few of the comments (the end could use some tweaks) it's still a good story. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 01:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC) For -- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 05:40, 6 August 2008 (UTC)  For.--Auk 06:59, 6 August 2008 (UTC) For I lik. YouFang 18:27, 6 August 2008 (UTC) FOR I lik Mudkipz. Baseball16Homebase!18:32, 6 August 2008 For. Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 20:45, Aug. 9, 2008 For. Funny and well written. Trrri333 17:19, 13 August 2008 (UTC) Weak for. There's some bits that aren't quite there, but there's enough that is. Just. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 20/08 16:47  Fnord! It's pretty good. But it's been a month, why is it still up for highlight? Sire Methamphetamine SMOKE METH! 16:23, 23 August 2008 (UTC) For. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  14:21, 26 August 2008 (UTC) Let's set the record straight. 84.194.239.240 15:18, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Against: 9.5	The pee reviewer's comments were on the money. This starts to fall apart as it goes on. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 06:09, 4 August 2008 (UTC)  Against. - very messy throughout, The concept could be made funnier, i.e. A thirty year old Satr Wars fand who lives a home etc.--Sycamore (Talk) 08:36, 4 August 2008 (UTC) Meh, Star Wars fans and stuff like that has all been done before. If he'd gone for that people would have been like "this is so unoriginal". - [08:53 4 August] Sir FSt Don Yettie Jeese, that's embarrassing...I didn't notice Orian's comment. - [08:54 4 August] Sir FSt Don Yettie Comment, Starwars fans that live at home? That would be a tierd concept not funny. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 08:37 4 August 2008 Against I'm just not feeling it. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:15, 4 August 2008 (UTC) Against Not mainpage quality --Moneke 11:59, 5 August 2008 (UTC) Against -- Sorry man, I can see you've improved the grammar since my review, but the overall concept still isn't doing it for me. BlueYonder - CONTACT too angry --77.74.198.125 14:09, 11 August 2008 (UTC) Against Sorry. --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 18:30, 13 August 2008 (UTC) AS per SoSo. ~ Readmesoon Against This should be featured once what has been said below and above has been acted upon. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 16:56, 23 August 2008 (UTC) i don't like it --Linosaur 13:44, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Abst Very well written, was it funny? I am not sure, it made me want to punch the guy more than laugh. Still I can see why others would find it funny. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC) Rory says: Homophobe!!! And he asked me to give you this 12" spike. /hands DJ the spike SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 11:03 4 August 2008 I says: Gay people are fine, it was the character that was an asshole. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:10, 4 August 2008 (UTC) Yeah, because he was gay. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 13:14 4 August 2008 Abstain. I don't think it's as front page as Thanks for buying our product! Now, fuck you. But it was moderately funny.[Meh. 17:25, 4 August 2008 (UTC)]Choose a fate of epic proportions. One Two Three Four Five Six and Seven New account says "Fnord!" Sire Methamphetamine SMOKE METH! 16:23, 23 August 2008 (UTC) Abstain. There were bits that made me laugh, but they got fewer as it went on. And it felt a little in need of a polish here and there. Pretty good, but I don't think it's there yet, myself. --UU - natter 10:10, Aug 5 OMGS! This story was about gay! haha. Got some laughs, but I thought some of the jokes fell a little flat, and I agree with So So, started out great, but fell off some after that. Abstern The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 16:33, 5 August 2008 (UTC) abstain. a bit too angry for my taste. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:32, 5 August 2008 (UTC) Abst. Per UU. -RAHB 00:40, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.