Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Local men secure enough in masculinity to fuck other men (re-redux)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

UnNews:Local men secure enough in masculinity to fuck other men (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: UnNews:Local men secure enough in masculinity to fuck other men	Score: 19.5 admins linked in the text
Nominated by:	Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:56, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
For: 19.5	NF I honestly enjoyed this article, and it broke my heart to see it go last time.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:56, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Mmmhmmm -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Yeahyeah. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:22, Nov 16 Hmmm-Razorflame (contributions) Talk 01:24, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Good stuffs Should have gotten featured last time. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs -01:46, Nov 16 Zombiebaron -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 01:50, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Very weak for Masterd 06:51, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Self For I could go on and on about how great this article is, or how much it reflects its authors, or make some scathing gay remark about the completely heterosexual relationship between Thinker and I. I'd probably even include the word bugger in there somewhere. But dammit, just feature this already! -RAHB 06:53, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Dig "What you see here before you is exactly what it looks like. I am, indeed, fucking a man." HAH, god that never ceases to crack me up.. --THINKER 07:54, 16 November 2007 (UTC) For. Per the last 2 times this was up. How has it not been featured yet? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 14:24, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Strong Zombiebaron - -- The Zombiebaron 16:13, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Agreed! yay buttsecks <3 .talk.work.?pedia.$A_{ward}^{waits}$ For as per the last two times this was nommed. I'd go off in search of whatever witty komments I made them, but that would mean exerting effort of some sort, which is too much to expect of me on a Friday night. --THE 21:56, 16 November 2007 (UTC) For. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 03:57, 17 November 2007 (UTC) Straight yes, this is an entirely heterosexual vote involving 15 men. Yes, that is what it is.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   06:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC)   For. -- Mitch 11:10, 17 November 2007 (UTC) Support for Macs and Linux. Wait, wrong subject matter. Oh fuck it, just take the vote and leave me alone. Ж WHEEEEE! 23:42, 17 November 2007 (UTC) For — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 03:44, 19 November 2007 (UTC) Win 203.214.138.140 07:33, 19 November 2007 (UTC) for - jack mort | cunt | talk - 13:19, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Against: 0	No against votes
Comments	Abstain • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 22:50, 16 November 2007 (UTC) THE: Your witty comments last time consisted of "for" and "for again". Literary genius! -RAHB 17:33, 17 November 2007 (UTC) But not so much as Eugene's current comment (which has now increased to 17 men.. sigh..) --THINKER 00:03, 18 November 2007 (UTC) So does that mean Kalir is a guy? -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 08:09, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.