Uncyclopedia:VFH/A bunch of aristocrats fucking. Awesome vid

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

A bunch of aristocrats fucking. Awesome vid (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: A bunch of aristocrats fucking. Awesome vid	Score: 15.5 rusty trombones
Nominated by:	T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
For: 17.5	N + F. A lovely romp through the wonderful world of YouTube comments. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)  The concept is just so awesome! I can't stop laughing! -->:( 21:20, 30 December 2007 (UTC)  For. --Æ 21:22, 30 December 2007 (UTC)  Damnit, I was supposed to be first in line! Damn my inattentiveness! -- Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 21:45, 30 December 2007 (UTC) Haha - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 00:38, Dec 31  Feature! --NXWave 04:06, 31 December 2007 (UTC) I remember this! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:09, Dec 31 For - Who would have thought they could have applied more than 101 uses for shit in the one video? Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC) For --Keysniper 15:54, 31 December 2007 (UTC) For gross, dudes.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 31) 17:48  For. --General Insineratehymn 00:06, 1 January 2008 (UTC)  For. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 03:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC) For --203.214.131.148 06:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC) Dig bravo. --THINKER 08:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)  For. YouTube comments usually suck. --MNM5150 22:30, 1 January 2008 (UTC)  For. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 23:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)  For.  Weasel 3689 23:31, 1 January 2008 (UTC)  For. Lawl Youtube and the world of comments.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 23:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Against: 2	Against I really don't find it all that funny....um, yeah. -RAHB 21:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC) Against...didn't think the doco was funny, either--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 12:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. I love it, I really do. But it just doesn't look neat to me. Yeah, I know this is a pretty stupid complaint, but it's what's preventing me from giving it a for. Maybe if the image quality was better. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:46 Dec 31, 2007 Needs a reskin. With a little more work, this could be like Internet Movie Database, and I think that taking it down for now in an effort to fix it up would be well worth it.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:51, 31 December 2007 (UTC) Thanks for all the nice comments. By all means, improve the image quality. I have virtually no aptitude for this stuff (it was originally made using a combination of Microsoft Word, print screen and microsoft picture manager). It doesn't help that youtube changed the appearance of their site shortly after I wrote the article. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  15:13, 31 December 2007 (UTC) I've installed paint.net and have improved some of the images. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  17:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC) For a quick and easy way to make things look better, for starters, you could move everything to the left a little bit and slap on the header from the YouTube article. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:53, 31 December 2007 (UTC) Abstain. Love it, but until there's better image quality, I will not vote for. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 09:31, Jan. 1, 2008 09:31, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.