User talk:The Thinker/Archive 6

Talk Archive 1 | Talk Archive 4 | Talk Archive 7
Talk Archive 2 | Talk Archive 5
Talk Archive 3 | Talk Archive 6

A further look, if you have the time

Hello, it's UU again, back like that irritating twinge in your left shoulder you're trying to ignore, but suspect you may need to speak to the doctor about.

I've pulled Down With That Sort Of Thing! into a shape I'm reasonably happy with, so I'm considering releasing it into the wild to fend for itself, and wondered if you'd take another minute or two to take another look first.

I've added an image I think is a bit better, given it an ending, tweaked the structure and so forth. I'm not sure if it needs some form of intro, or if it works launching straight in to the dialogue. I'm also wondering if I need another image (I can't find one of a stuffy man vibrating with the necessary indignation). And I also suspect you're right about it needing a name change. Problem is, I'm really attached to the name - it comes from Father Ted, a sitcom I love, and I can't bring myself to change it. If you're sure it will help the article, say so and I'll take that as the kick I need to move on from my attachment!

Finally, nice work with the Hell's Chicken Showdown article. I had absolutely no idea who Yanni was when I encountered it (although Google soon took care of that), but thoroughly enjoyed it. Thanks for a good laugh on a cloudy tuesday after a lovely, sunny long weekend! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:29, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Looks good to me man!! Very funny; set it free at your discretion. I like the new pic, and I hadn't realized it was spurn of Father Ted! I love that show as well! Should it be VFH'd, you've got my vote. ;) --THINKER 15:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Much obliged to you. I have let it out of the pen and into the great wide open, as Tom Petty once said. *Sniff*, they grow up so fast! I'll have to make a shiny template sooner or later just so's you can be the first to have one! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 18:08, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Under User has blessed you with cake for being friendly and/or useful. Eat it quickly before he changes his mind. Warning: cake prepared in an environment which also processes nuts, and contains lactose, gluten, ground glass and arsenic, which gives it a lovely tang.

There you go. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:23, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Let's Eat!

THEY TRIED TO PREVENT THIS ARTICLE FROM BEING FEATURED They failed. Let's Eat!. Those bizarre triangle-shaped dough stuff. What the hell are those anyway? Oh, and thank you for voting!

~ 12:47, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

An idea

I've been thinking about the next phase of the project, the "Behind the Scenes with the Smiths" page. One of the original ideas you suggested was a section for "Cast and Crew Biographies." I was thinking it might be tricky making a cast and crew biography section that could stand on its own...Perhaps instead of making a sub-page devoted to cast and crew bios, we could blend biographical information right in to the documentary? I think that breif bios could fit in relatively seamlessly to a "behind the scenes" page. Whadya think? --THE 20:34, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

THE is back!! Yayz, I'm glad we're still pushing forward with this.

I know this may sound a bit backwards, but for the Behind the Scenes with the Smiths, lets hold off for just a bit. No great length or anything; just enough time for us to finalize the edits on the deleted scenes and trailers. I'll get back on the deleted scenes, which I should've been doing in your absence (what a neglectful asshole). I think the trailers may be ready for approval as finished, but gotta double check on that. I should have my remaining edits done relatively soon, thereafter we can get moving on the Smiths doc. I just don't want to work like we usually do on that one (like getting the skeleton done and then filling in the details) -- I'd like us to build it full through, to keep it in line with other in-project pages like the original Sex Seafood doc. Let me know if this is a problem (and feel free to remind me regularly should my mind wander, as it is prone to do). --THINKER 04:34, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I definitely agree about writing the Smiths one the same way we wrote the original "Sex Seafood" article. And yeah, we can wait until we're finished the trailers and deleted scenes before moving on. I agree that the trailers are in pretty good shape, perhaps a few pictures would help, I might add some later today. And no rush on thinkerizing the deleted scenes, there's no due date on this :). --THE 16:12, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

You've been Invited

You've been invited to take an exiting new beta test of concept of Satiropendium, the comedic compendium!

Satiropendium requires good writers willing to collaborate articles with others, tough critics to review the articles to see if they're worthy, and stewards to verify the articles as being the best they are. More details can be seen in the link. If you are not the best writer, the inviter might have you in mind as a critic and steward, and if ever the full wiki is setup, you will be able to have a chance to get a full fleged admin account, but that's only if you're one of the first five to sign up for the job (and there's a pretty good you will be).

Note: There was a seperate wiki, but because it was a decrepit old version of mediawiki, it was shut down until adequate hosting can be found. You can help us get hosting by joining and helping out!

~

Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

29/08/2007 @ 21:40

Hmmm... sounds like something I'd be into, though I don't know if I fully understand the concept. I'll read the forum topics on this and whatnot. --THINKER 04:34, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Bleh.

please accept this template both as a thank-you for voting on "Ode to the Monotony of Life" but also, in its own, small way, as a symbol of the monotony, general grayness, and eternal dull unchangingness of life, which somehow continues to go on despite many objections to it and people opting out of it, God knows why

– Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 21:42 Aug 29, 2007

Congratulations

Just wanted to congratulate you on a well-earned Writer of the Month Award. Way to go THINKER! Slithy Tove 02:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks so much Rog! I'll be making the rounds with personalized thank you tomorrow night I think, so look out for a nicely detailed one on your talk.

PS - I really wish you'd write more. I can't think of an article of yours that I've read and not enjoyed. Quite the opposite. ;) --THINKER 06:52, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

HAHA LOOK!

Not in exactly a normal state of mind right now. And I think Wikia is hiccuping again. But look!:

HAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!! See what you do when you're not getting laid?! YOU MAKE FUNNY LITTLE CARTOONS!!! :) --THINKER 04:23, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Pathetic, isn't it? -RAHB 04:33, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Consider Your Penis...REMOVE'D!

THANK YOU FOR VOTING!
You voted for Why?:Remove Your Penis on VFH, and it got featured!! As a token of our humble appreciation, you receive 75% off your next Penis Removal!
Come see us sometime, the doctor would love to meat meet you.

And thanks for the nom, ya crazy! -RAHB 03:29, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, what have we here

I could go on like this all night. -RAHB 05:50, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

awesome!

Gerrycheevers sincerely thanks you. Your vote for NotM is much appreciated. As a token of his gratitude, Gerry wishes to offer you his services should you ever be looking for a goalie while planning a pick-up street hockey game.

thanks again for your support. i hope to continue to earn your respect, approval, and spare change. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 03:48, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm Not Dead Yet!

Your n00b is indeed not dead yet; only resting. In fact, I actually [finally] wrote a quick UnNews article. UnNews:Uncyclopedia_author_found_to_have_false_credentials Check my new piece of shit now! --SirIsaac 22:36, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Nice! I touched it up a bit and added a little at the bottom. Then I put it in the recent UnNews Template, so you're currently on the mainpage! Good job dude; I'm working on an UnNews myself currently. You stickin' around for a while then? --THINKER 23:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

By all indications. I would like to run another UnNews article I have sitting around in my notebook, so if I see you in IRC I'll send it on somehow. --SirIsaac 23:32, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

I'd go on now but I've got to be heading out in a little bit. If you want, create it in your Userspace (User:SirIsaac/Article Title Here). If not, I'm sure I'll be on IRC at some point quite soon. --THINKER 23:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

cont. from VFH H&B

Yeah, that article needs something, possibly some Thinker. But note that I purposely tried to avoid the usual Uncyc custom of, what is it called, "truth in the link"? For example, I debated whether I should do stuff like "... we are very innovative about the ways we show love." I decided against. Usually I do that, but I wanted this article to be different. I wanted it to be genuinely disturbing. Almost oppresively black humor. But somehow it falls flat as is. I'm not saying you have to stick to my original approach though. Have fun with it. Maybe we can go dutch on a feature. --So So 11:55, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Oh the truth in linkage is perfectly fine; I wouldn't change a thing on that. I really dig the piece overall. I just think the irony of a multinational conglomerate being compassionate and caring about diversity should be expanded a bit. All it needs is a little synergy, some strategic resource evaluation and reallocation, and an IUA-149b form, and it'll be featured for sure. :) --THINKER 21:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

I did. I went there.

Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 14:50, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome

You're welcome. I recently wrote Backmasking, but it didn't go over too well on VFH (+1). Too much rehashing the same joke probably. Anyway, I'm busy writing other things since I just began a new degree in creative writing, so I'm not writing much for Uncyclopedia right now. Maybe periodically. Slithy Tove 01:01, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Ya welcome, eh?

Well, it seems as if you have won the Writer of the Month award. That means you done well last month (two months ago? ah well, moving on), but that doesn't mean you stop writing. I'll beat you with a large blunt object if you do that. It's only business, nothing more.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:14, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

And from me too. That was a well deserved WotM. You took a large delivery of funny, and surgically inserted it into well-written articles. A good job well done, say I. Oh, and ta for your comments on my (slow) development! I think I'm starting to get to know my way around here. I got to the lunch hall last week without stopping to ask for directions, and the hall monitors haven't noticed me yet! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:20, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

A penny for the guy, hey ?

So Mr. Thinker, i was thinking about doing an article on the effects of sexual abstinence on teenagers and how this reflects in a placid pool of gently sparkling neurons on those beautiful little brains. Problem is, i really don't know how to make, edit, mess up or otherwise utilize this hellish wikian construct. I got the testimonial (the fucked-up teenager's testimonial, that is) all banged up, but i can't make a page just with it. I need an introductory sentence, templates, images, and exactly how do i put these goddamn things in wikicode. I was wondering if you could spare the time to help me. I'd show you the testimonial, and you'd give me your thoughs. Gentle, placid, thoughts. I'm sure you're a partisan of abstinence just as much as me, eh ? nudge nudge, etc. Well...i'd be grateful if you could consider that. I'm not sure how else i can contact you, besides using this, and i'm not even sure what this is. Seems you're the only one i 'know' around here. So, what do you say ?

well, hope you take this into consideration. just not too much. Regards, --Loathing 18:33, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Ah ha! The mysterious Loathing has returned. I'm quite excited to see what twisted comedic stylings you bring my way.

All you have to do to get started is create the article in your Userspace. To do so, Simply type User:Loathing/[YourArticle'sTitle] into the search bar to your left and click Go. Once there, click the edit tab and type to your heart's content. Don't worry about all the complicated wikijargon at this point; in your user space it cannot be deleted or altered without your permission. I'll take a look at the content and help you out as needed. So go ahead and get that going, then drop me a line when you're ready for me to take a look. Oh, and if it isn't funny, you're sacrificed the wind goddess Luhora. ;) --THINKER 22:39, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, the meat of the text's done. I meant it to be somewhat prolix, but maybe it is excessively so. And it's badly, horrible formatted. I have no idea whatsoever of what to do with a layout of any kind. And you know what ? I have just noticed i tend to be overly-adjectivated and hyperbolic. Who would've known ? Well, anyway, if you could drop in and take a look, i'd thank you humbly. --Loathing 19:39, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Oh yeah, i'm a moron. Here's the link http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User:Loathing/Sexual_Abstinence --Loathing 19:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

HAH! Now that, that is quite funny! I'm thinking that it would make an excellent UnBook. I think it'd probably be good to make mention of the Catcher in the Rye parody for those who may not have read it. Sounds like it'd be awesome as UnBooks:Pitcher in the Rye! That has serious excellence potential.

I have a couple of ideas to clean it up and get it presentable; let me know what you think about the title change and I'll work from there. Great work so far though man, that is seriously funny stuff. --THINKER 23:56, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Hey, man, thanks ! I seriously didn't know if it'd be funny or just plain weird...But yeah, title changing seems like a good idea. I actually based that article on what I thought a gonzo column would read like if the author had some serious sexual troubles. Ever read transmetropolitan ? I'll show you the original 'column' if you like, but yeah, i think it works best (especially in terms of uncyc humor) if it's changed to a more...shall we say...parodiable parody, yeah ? Yeah, that sounded pretty strange. Still, no worries, eh ? Brainstorm all you want, man. I think you're on the right track. And i'm always around. Somewhere. Thanks again for the encouragement. English's not my native language and sometimes i think i get it pretty tangled up. Well, my heart is filled with joy. Regards, --Loathing 00:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Now this ocurred to me in a flash: What about some kind of cross between Burroughs' Naked Lunch (taking the character, Benway) and Catcher in the Rye ? Seems just crazy enough to work, perhaps ? Using the structure of Catcher in the Rye, adding little elements of Naked Lunch. What'cha think ?--Loathing 00:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, you might want to split that concept into two articles. That sounds like it might try to cover too much funny and end up confusing. I'll put this on my Workinonit list, since it might be a couple of days before I can devote some quality time with it. Fear not though, it is on the fast track. --THINKER 02:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Righty-o, man. I'll be waiting. thanks.--Loathing 15:33, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Nice forward. Really touched me. So, I altered the introduction and conclusion, to make it more agreeable as an UnBook. Please have a look at it and tell me what you think, if it's fresh for the press or straight to the bin. Regards, again and again, Loathing is quite redundant. --Loathing 16:08, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Think!

Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:54, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes, indeed

Thanks for reading.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

And now, a Public Service Announcement

Thekillerfroggy and Doctor Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Skullthumper would like for donating to the Throws and Downs Club of America. So keep your pillows held up in your room, lock your liquor cabinet, and alert the local authorities of possible pillboxes. Only you can prevent pillow fighting!

ecxllenet!

Pelsae aeccpt tihs etxrmely ltae tnkah you tmepltae for yuor vtoe for taht wierd atrcile taht porblaby hrut yuor eeys. Yuor wsiodm and gnersotiy are ellquad olny by yuor bearth, wihch is as fersh as a smmuer ham.

thanks again! --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 03:39, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank You

Please accept this offer for supporting HowTo:Deceive people on eBay on VFH--Sir Manforman 11:35, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

YOU AREN'T THINKERER!!!!!!!!!!!!1

I'm afraid the "you aren't thinkerer" meme was my doing. How does it feel to be a meme? :)

Well, Conservation Week is all over and done with, and I'm all set to get back to the project whenever you are. --THE 13:00, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Hah yeah I found saw that, thank you for immortalizing me in the hallowed halls of UnChat. Soon, I'll be up there with Peter. ;)

And yes, the project needs to get up and running. No more backburning on my part. I'm in the midst of a big school project, so it might be a bit slow, but I promise that the next thing I edit will be project-related. Let me do myself a favor..

WORK ON SEX SEAFOOD YOU PRICK!!

Yeah, that should work. :) --THINKER 18:11, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Great job, mate!

Another Top 3! You, my friend, are an outstanding writer. Good job.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:03, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Indeed! Thanks man.. thank god I wrote it before the Thinkerer meme was developed. :D --THINKER 00:05, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Heh, that's true. Because then it'd be all "vanity" against'd.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:10, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Eh, I think everyone is entitled to their one-off vanity VFH nom.. I nommed it more because it made me laugh hysterically than because of the meme. I hope RAHB and his team of merry oddities create more UnTunes -- perhaps a few that aren't even about me -- so I can nom them as well (and let them have a fighting chance) :D --THINKER 01:52, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

You know I've never written anything truly "vain." I'm much more consumed with other things. Like writing non-vain stuff. And homework. Though that's less important, if my priorities are straight. Which they are.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:59, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Mentorship

Would you by any chance want to be my Mentor? - Masterof9puppets 15:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, I'm always accepting n00bs for adoption, but it seems that you've already sought assistance from TheLedBalloon.. He's a damn capable writer, things not working out with him?

Either way I'm always happy to help anyone who comes to me for assistance. Feel free to seek me out for Pee Reviews or other aidings. ;) --THINKER 17:45, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Oi! I want to be mentorized too!!! --Zounas 01:47, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, like I tell all my new recruits: I do not harbor inactive writers. Membership in the THINK! Army requires at least a single completed article, or an article in progress. Link me to your piece and you shall be considered. :) --THINKER 01:01, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

cool

You are presented with one (1) bomb shelter for voting for DOHS Anti-Terrorism Regulations. In the event of a terrorist attack, simply place your bomb in this handy (and stylish!) container to protect it from harm.

enjoy! --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 01:23, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Genteel gratitude

Thanks for joining the campaign against this sort of thing. By swelling our already formidable ranks, you have helped ensure that our voice will not go unheard! Glorious success will yet be ours! Sorry dear, I will keep the noise down. Thanks for your vote.

You have been thanked. My pee review was THINKERed. Both of these things are good, I hope! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:35, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Ah yes, good show old boy. I'm quite glad your piece made it to feature, as I am certainly against this sort of thing. :) --THINKER 01:03, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

MF Doom

Went to read the article and you'd gone when I returned. Think there's plenty of snippets of humour in there, but I wouldn't be too upset if you were looking to do a rewrite. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

VFH related-stuff

I have emailed you on the specifics of my beliefs concerning Dane Cook. Please respond there. In other news, how's your Vigilance Week? I'm insane: I've taken on America and Scientology.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:53, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

You iz teh AOTM

Congrats! That is all.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:37, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you again.

	Necropaxx awards you your certificate of quitting!
	PS: Thanks for learning HowTo:Stop Being a Nerd on VFH.

More to come! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 02:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Tanks 4 teh votes

The UnIdiot wood like u 2 no thay reeding hells you improd u're readding nd wrting! Weeding is fund! Thanks for voting on UnNews:Studies show people who read are better at reading

Thank you for the vote! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 01:22, Oct 3

Hmmm....

I notice you've changed your vote on Dane Cook. I must admit that it was rather unexpected, and I'd like to know your reasoning behind it.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:04, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Ah, I see what it was. I'm really, really, really sorry that I removed it. I toyed with the idea of skipping over it due to its score, but that wouldn't be fair to the other articles underneath it. Sorry.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 12:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the vote

Thank you for voting on my first article! Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 03:04, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

You may now dig my article

You now have my permission to vote for it. Also, I made the namespace change like you suggested. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 05:56, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

LOL, you give THINKER permission? You're lucky its a funny little piece, n00b. ;) Voted. --THINKER 06:22, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Would you be so kind...

...As to piddle on my article? Thanks muchly: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Books never written --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 08:16, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Stupendous! I'll dedicate my next unwritten book to you. Also, I've added a section about copyright laws, and it should soon have a picture. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 01:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

A poor attempt at whoring

Ah, The THINKER. A noble bastion of writing excellence in a sea of vandals. Or something. Ahem, aside from that, I thought I'd have a go at this "whoring" that seems so popular. I'm not doing a very good job at it, to be honest. I'm probably too polite. But anyway, I'm hoping that you'll think I've done a decent job with my article Shopping list, and will be moved to vote for it. That's about it really, tatty byes! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:40, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Ooh, has a nerver been struck? Don't worry, this is very possibly my first and last attempt at whoring. It goes against all my high falutin' moral standards. Apologies for going against yours! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 20:34, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Nah, its just that whoring, to me, undermines the integrity of the voting VFH system. Its not a huge deal (I'm sure I've been guilty of it at some point or another), just try to go the more subtle route next time. Asking for Pee Reviews is always a good one. :) --THINKER 20:41, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I think I agree with that! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks...sort of

You still haven't responded to my first messages about Dane Cook, but as it's now been featured, I suppose I'll thank you for all the previous support that you've given my article in the past. The resounding pee review, the first genuine VFH support, the second VFH nom's support, the fleeting support of the third nomination....well, anyway, thanks. I'm sorry you felt compelled (for an as-yet unexplained reason) to change your vote, but in any case, what's done is done.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:07, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

I have returned.

What's up? --THE 21:20, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

A shame-faced attempt at thanking

The whoring worked, but I feel cheap. Hey, it's quite an accurate name for it then! I won't be doing it again, I feel, and please accept this slightly tarnished template as a grubby thanking! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

The list to the left contains all the thanks you could ever need. It also contains the names of all those who voted for Under User's article shopping list. And it contains 94 other items. Perhaps you'd like to spot them if your sudoku was too easy today?

I only ask because your writing is better than that. You don't need it. The health system keeps them around for a while, and I generally only consciously abstain from articles in the negatives. --THINKER 08:07, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

	The UnIdiot wishes to acknowledge you for voting for UnNews:Iran to invade Iran, and hopes that you support Iran's plan to invade Iran.
	The UnIdiot also appreciates you putting up with his persistent whoring!

Thanks again! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 00:57, Oct 12

hey

k thx bai Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 08:21, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the "Hey, buddy!"

Thanks for noticing the YAROTZ (Yet Another Return Of Teh Zim_ulation). I've had an awful cold or flu, or some such, and I think today is actually the first day I'm feeling human again. I am delighted by the fact that audio and article don't match, and I thank you for telling me about it. Cheers! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 18:26, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

THINKERER!!!!

Thanks for the vote! I'm lookin' forward to continuing with the blatant absurdity of SS :D --THE 12:21, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

American (species)

Built Ford tough.

On VFH, you stated that the article needed a lead image. I appreciate the suggestion—I hadn't thought of it until then. However, I am at a loss as to what to put as the image. Should it just be some generic image of Americans, or something more specific? I am toying with the idea of using the picture you see here, but unfortunately the article describes humans and not lizards. (Granted, Americans do have some lizard-like qualities. But they're more slimy than scaly.) What do you think? --_CUN RA ^{Talk to me} _ 18:51, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

LOL, I like it!! Either that, or an extremely obese tub of lard in front of the flag, that'd also work..

But my other concern about the species, genus, species thing, what do you think about that? --THINKER 20:47, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

I don't quite see what you're getting at. All of the species listed are called "Americans" because they are all members of the genus Americanus. I included the undocumented immigrant in the list because I knew if I didn't, others would just add it in (and be more racist with it than I would). Are you complaining because species can't really evolve and "jump branches" into a different genus?

By the way, I'm having trouble coming up with an appropriate caption for the proposed picture. Any suggestions would be appreciated. --_CUN RA ^{Talk to me} _ 22:39, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

"Average body size ranges from anorexic to obese, depending on the species" Well if American is the species, than how can this trait be species dependent? Maybe I'm missing something in the classification hierarchy or something.

I went the traditional down-the-center route in my cap here, but some others:

A typical blue (and cold) blooded American male.
The average American has the ability to lose its fatty growths (in this case, a tail) and instantly regrow it. This phenominon is known as "regeneration," and sometimes referred to as "binging and purging."
Built Ford Tough (my personal favorite)

Lemme know whatcha think. --THINKER 00:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

I think you were misled by the title. The title American (species) means plural species. In this context, "American" refers to the genus, the next level up from species. (Given your name, I'm surprised that you don't know your taxonomic classifications.)

Oh, and I, too like your third suggestion best. It's just so wonderfully random. --_CUN RA ^{Talk to me} _ 00:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

By the way, what does "I went the traditional down-the-center route in my cap here" mean? You lost me there. --_CUN RA ^{Talk to me} _ 01:01, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I had to change the caption. Once I put it in the article, "Built Ford tough" just seemed too random. --_CUN RA ^{Talk to me} _ 01:16, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

You made the right choice...

Thanks for voting for me! Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 21:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello, USERNAME, and welcome to the non-automated Thank You messaging system!

Forgive the awfully mechanical introduction, I swear this Thank You is entirely personal, spare this introductory sentence. I'm not going to lie, THINKER: when you first joined this site, I hated your guts. Your signature took up at least six lines of code, you were a total dick on VFH, and your unique choice of word for voting confused and infuriated me. However, you've just been completely redeemed by voting for me on UotM! One last word: WRITE MORE! It'd be a shame if one of the contenders for WotY woefully fell behind due to inactivity D: -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:39, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Hah, thanks TKF. I hated me at first too. But likewise, my vote for you on UotM redeemed myself to myself. But just so you know, if Rebecca Sealfon doesn't get featured on the nom, I'll be taking a leave of absence from Un. I love this place dearly, but this whoring insanity has really taken its toll. I strive for quality writing, and that is the exact opposite of my goal. So, take that for what it is, and you are certainly welcome for my vote, as you are one of the coolest on this site. --THINKER 04:58, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Oh Noez! :( A leave of absence? But what of the project? Keep me posted on what you decide to do man. Oh yeah, and PLZ DON'T LEAVE!!!!!!!!!!1111111 :( --THE 19:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Hmm yes, the project must be completed, and that will happen. Trust me, I don't want to leave. I just cannot devalue my own work by doing the "pearls before swine" kinda thing if this fucking bullshit with VFH keeps up. It makes the site look childish and amateur when garbage becomes FA material. So if the general population cannot pull their heads out of their asses and vote for quality (not to toot my own horn too overtly), I'm going to have to abstain from contributing. No worries though, the project will be done either way. --THINKER 20:25, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I hear you, there's been a lot of insane whoring going on lately. I think the roots of it may be that there just aren't any other ways of getting one's work recognized here, I mean, you can submit stuff to the Piddler and get a bit of praise, but other than that, there are very few things here designed for recognizing article quality other than VFH. So people SNF everything. What's more, uncyclopedia in general seems to have taken a turn for the worst. Flamewars are breaking out regularly, and everyone seems to have at least one user who they hate passionately. Well, on the bright side, after a round on IRC I've come to believe we'll sort out this madness and uncyclopedia will live to see a new day. Whee! I'm glad you still want to finish our project. Once it's done, it will be something truly unique, and I think it will serve to show that there's more to Uncyclopedia than being a VFH machine. Sex Seafood is an uncyclopedian's indie film! Wooo! --THE 18:59, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Excellent voting

Thank you! For voting for Books never written! Cainad thinks you deserve no less than a beige, green-bordered thank-you note for your support. So that is what you get. Seriously though, thanks. Leaving the article un-featured as a gimmick seemed... silly.

--The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 02:15, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Pee Review request

Hi THINKER, I was wondering if you could review my article, Top hat because you are a really good reviewer. Thanks! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:44, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

First availability tomorrow (or Sunday, due to my work schedule), I will certainly review this. I was going to try to do it tonight but I'm tired it looks like you put some work into, so I'll give it my full attention. :) --THINKER 07:33, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Ah, and emc works too. :) --THINKER 20:05, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Ah haaaaa!!!

Just the person. When be Thanksgiving? -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

As much fun as it would be, I think I'm going to have to hold off. Trust me I want to, but I'm working constantly, pissed at UN right now, and could use the $20 to buy tuna fish. If anything, maybe I'll do it as its own thing, not coinciding with any holiday at all sometime next year, I don't know. If you want to take over the concept and expand it to the multi-event festivus that you were describing, that'd also be cool by me. --THINKER 21:38, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps thats all the more reason to do it, I don't know? I think it would be nice to have something for people to focus on and bring a bit of fun to the site, as well as some competition. Maybe if we ditch the cash prize and make it purely for the kudos? I've spoken to a few people who are really keen for this to go ahead.... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

YOU ARE NOT THINKERER

Well, you haven't been on IRC lately, just figured I'd remind you. Cheers, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:58, Nov 5

Hah, indeed, I shall be in IRC this evening after work if I can keep my eyes open. Eugene also reminded me of this fact. --THINKER 21:26, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

In light of the overwelming support of a load of no-life losers in IRC I've moved "the page" to mainspace in preperation for Thanksgiving. I've removed the cash prize part in case I can't get people to cough up, and added you as a judge. That is all. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Actually you know what fuck it, Rebecca Sealfon got featured by a wise, content-appreciating user, which is enough for me to want to stick around. Go ahead and put in the $20 cash prize, I'll fork it over out-of-pocket if someone can make me seriously laugh with an Aristocrats joke. :) --THINKER 01:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:VFH/Down Home Drug Commercial

Hey Thinker, advice on how to improve it? --  Le Cejak • <-> 21:39, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Well first, though it has a flow and narrative, it has no actual narrator to facilitate. Also, while it has commercial elements, it doesn't really feel like you're actually parodying the selling aspect of a commercial. Also, as a commercial, its a bit lengthy. It could probably just use a bit of selective editing and a little restructuring. --THINKER 21:44, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

How's about this: Down Home Drug Commercial/Deluxe? I cut out quite a bit. --  Le Cejak • <-> 22:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Much better! The only think I can say about it is that, while I do like all lead-up, you might want to get to the twist a little quicker (ie. the family-on-fire-setting). You might be able to work it in earlier and still achieve the same desired effect. --THINKER 00:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I took out the "heart" section and merged the first part of that with "Arthritis". I took out the cow picture and sacrificed it for "soft focus arthritis" Down Home Drug Commercial/Deluxe --  Le Cejak • <-> 00:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

UnPoetia:Ode to Pink Shirt Guy

Welcome to Uncyclopedia! This ain't your mom's Wikipedia…  Please keep all hands and feet inside the vehicle at all times.  ~Zana Dark

I know you've been here awhile, but perhaps you'd like to join the CAUSE??? Vote FOR ADOPTION... ~Formerly Annoying Crap 00:33, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps if I decide to stay. Rebecca Sealfon has to get featured immediately though, or I am most certainly taking leave. I'll be in touch though; dig the concept. --THINKER 00:38, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Feel the power of science!!

	The Led Balloon has awarded with the gift of sciencey knowledge, because he can already tell that you are smarter than that asshat judge was.
	Thanks for voting, and remember, magic science is all around us!

Thanks for the vote, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:23, Nov 12

Ahem

*cough**cough**cough* -RAHB 21:12, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Why yes

I'd love help with Jaws did WTC, now that you mention it. I mean, I'd do it myself, but I suck and have no free time.--<<>> 01:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Hah cool, I'll work on it a bit this weekend. --THINKER 07:01, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Much obliged again!

Ta muchly! Under User would like to present you with a chandelier by way of thanks for voting for his hat-trick highlight article, HowTo:Fuck Off. It isn't tasteful or stylish, is in no way understated (unless you happen to live in a palace) and so forth, but it has a long chain, sturdy hand holds, and swings well, and will be an invaluable aid to fucking off stylishly in future. Place it carefully!

It's always good to get the THINKER seal of approval on VHF!

You have been thanked, and now (with weary predictability) I must fuck off! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 23:00, 15 November 2007 (UTC)