User talk:Cassie/archive6

55k bytes in just about 3 days... woah.

And 88kb in 7.

Customize Newstyle templates

Add the following code to your custom CSS to make the templates rectangular.

.newstyle-template {
  border-radius: 0px !important;
  border: 1px solid #aaa !important;
}
.ntred {
  background: linear-gradient(to right, red, red 10px, #fbfbfb 10px, #fbfbfb) !important;
}
.ntorange {
  background: linear-gradient(to right, orange, orange 10px, #fbfbfb 10px, #fbfbfb) !important;
}
.ntgold {
  background: linear-gradient(to right, #e0bb25, #e0bb25 10px, #fbfbfb 10px, #fbfbfb) !important;
}
.ntblue {
  background: linear-gradient(to right, #08f, #08f 10px, #fbfbfb 10px, #fbfbfb) !important;
}
.ntfuchsia {
  background: linear-gradient(to right, #ff00a5, #ff00a5 10px, #fbfbfb 10px, #fbfbfb) !important;
}

You can modify the code for practical reasons if you like. --Jabberwock (talk) 01:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Alrighty, thanks! I'll probably try implementing it here and there just for fun eventually. As for now, I'm still kind of stuck attempting to redesign my userspace (as you may be able to see...)  Cassandra  (talk) 01:31am  February 1, 2021

I think your talk page is already BEAUTIFUL! --Jabberwock (talk) 02:49, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Edit request backlog

I came here to basically ask you if you could execute some of these edit requests, as there is even one dating back to 2009. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 02:13, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

The backlog is empty now. I'm surprised no admin has bothered with working on it in such a long time.  Cassandra  (talk) 10:13am  February 1, 2021

Restoration of Deleted Article

Hey I noticed that World War 1 in a Alternate Universe was deleted by you, I plan on finishing it today so I'm requesting if you could bring it back since I'm planning on also finishing the related articles soon. -- Kazuma Satō (talk) 00:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I've just restored the article for you. Sorry for any inconvenience caused. Hope you can continue your writing!  Cassandra  (talk) 09:42am  February 1, 2021

Please protect

Forum:Count to a million/32. And please redirect them to Forum:Count to a million, as it was moved somemay get confused. It's an archive, so no need for editing anyway. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:06, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

• Alrighty. I'll put something saying where the current CTAM is.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:26pm  February 1, 2021

Have a good day, and may Sophia bless you, ~~~~

I created a template that says "Have a good day, and may Sophia bless you," because I see you say that a lot in your custom ambox warning things. It can be found here. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 16:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Also, I would like to hereby request adoption. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 17:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Great template! Maybe it needs to be safesubst'd though. Just making sure, you're hereby requesting that I adopt you under the Adopt-a-Noob Program?  Cassandra  (talk) 05:33pm  February 1, 2021

test -> Have a good day, and may Sophia bless you,  Cassandra  (talk) 17:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

As for the template, I honestly don't know the difference between subst and safesubst, but as for the adopt thing, I am referring to the adopt-a-noob program. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 17:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Alrighty. Consider yourself adopted! And as for template substitution, I don't know either, because I am, as everyone knows, throughly retarded.  Cassandra  (talk) 07:18pm  February 1, 2021

Please delete Interstate 80

And please use something like "R2-cross namespace redirect" because people keep recreating. Thanks --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Alrighty, 'tis done.  Cassandra  (talk) 05:34pm  February 1, 2021

Request

Hi. I'd like to request for me to be able to directly QVFD articles, but only (1) cross namespace redirects, (2) author requests deletion, so that this way I can stop annoying you bout this and your tp will literally reach over 100 kB in a month at this rate.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:19, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll allow author requests from either yourself, or if the page has been purposefully blanked by its author. For cross-namespace redirects, I would still advise that you bug me for those, since Uncyclopedia doesn't have an explicit rule like CSD R2.  Cassandra  (talk) 07:17pm  February 1, 2021

I actually made User:Gale5050/Uncyclopedia: Cross namespace redirects! Please move to the main Uncyclopedia space, add a shortcut to it(like UN:R2 or UN:CSR), and if necessary make it an ignorable policy.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Also please delete I-4. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

I copied the essay to UN:XNR, I won't really make it a rule, simply because it would be difficult to grandfather in; I wouldn't mind having other users refer to it when QVFDing redirects though, since often times, it could serve as a very valid reason. As for I-4, owing to how the redirect has lasted 11 years, I won't bother removing it; however, for any "newer" articles that do not warrant mainspace status and which do not fit within UN:XNR's recommendations, feel free to let me know so I can huff them.  Cassandra  (talk) 09:19pm  February 1, 2021

Also, can you merge the page histories just for fun? Have a good day, and may Sophia bless you, JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 21:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Can UN:R2 also be redirected? Also I-4 was created, by me, 4 months ago.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 21:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I have absolutely no fucking idea how Merge Histories works, and I kind of goofed it up when I tried, so oh well, I don't think that's going to happen (unfortunately). As for the redirect, consider it done; I-4 was kind of tinkered with on-and-off as of recently, but yeah, I think I'll just "grandfather" the redirect in this time.  Cassandra  (talk) 11:59pm  February 1, 2021

Have you tried Special:MergeHistory? JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 00:00, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Yeah... I forgot to check a radio button the first time I attempted using that function. It's rarely used on Uncyclopedia, perhaps that is why I'm so dumb at times.  Cassandra  (talk) 12:02am  February 2, 2021

Wait, AFAICT, you actually did it! JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 00:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Great! I'm still working on familiarizing myself with some of these lesser-used functions Mediawiki has... I pretty much would never require them on a "normal" day, simply because of how rarely things like it need to be used.  Cassandra  (talk) 12:05am  February 2, 2021

Also, AFAICT, your histmerge was the second in Uncyclopedian history, so... congrats? Have a good day, and may Sophia bless you, JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 00:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

That was actually the 2nd merge during the entirety of Uncyclopedia's history! So yeah. Not even Zombiebaron has used that before.  Cassandra  (talk) 02:13am  February 2, 2021

XNR

Hey, so Winnie the poo is now a cross name redirect. After moving Xi Jinping to my user space, I changed Winnie's redirect target just so it wouldn't be a broken redirect. Feel free to huff it, it's definitely not necessary now and probably should have its own article some day. Cheers. MrX blow me 22:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

And please archive the VFD, leaving a note that it was moved into userspace.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

I think it's fair to keep this one, simply because of how the article capitalizes on a rather common joke anyway. Also, VFD tag removed and all.  Cassandra  (talk) 11:56pm  February 1, 2021

Human rights

Featured article; please semi indef.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 23:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

(We really actually need PCR...) JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 23:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Consider it done! And as for PCR, pestering Lyrithya might be the only way to go ahead with it...  Cassandra  (talk) 11:57pm  February 1, 2021

Meh, we'll see about the forum.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:28, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Check out Forum: Count to a million

And go to the bottom. I am not gonna spoil the secret, but something huge happened. Go check it out!!!--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:53, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Oh god though. Please check out Forum:Count to a million#Yeet and fix the issue, I meant to transclude those numbers from 750001 to 880000 not to link. Please help --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:59, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Congrats on it! I'll quickly fix it up. As for now... I'll let CTAM sit for maybe a day, and then I'll rebrand it as CTAB (Count to a Billion) and imagine nothing ever happened. The thing with the transclude is: "Category:Pages where template include size is exceeded", so the page would exceed 2 MB if that were to be included. I'll have to archive the page twice then. I'm too tired right now though, so please remind me about it in about 12 hours or something.  Cassandra  (talk) 02:09am  February 2, 2021

FYI

207.246.66.45 belongs to 207.246.64.0/20, which is currently blocked from wp as an open proxy. (Might be worth updating the block log). As for 45.142.28.13, 45.142.28.0/24 is also a proxy.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 02:05, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Both will be huffed now. Thank you for letting me know!  Cassandra  (talk) 02:09am  February 2, 2021

Oh, they are both already blocked. I am saying, that they should have it updated with "open proxy", and converted to hardblocks. They have severe abuse potential. I will scavenger any open proxies to block. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 02:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll probably see if softblocks are fine, simply because Uncyclopedia doesn't quite have an IP-exempt user role. As for scavenging for open proxies, it would be highly appreciated! :)  Cassandra  (talk) 02:14am  February 2, 2021

Any IP listed here is an open proxy. I am not copy-pasting 50,000 IPs, especially at 9:16pm local time during a blizzard.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 02:16, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

I'd say that, due to minimal collateral and softblocks, to triple the block lengths(anything blocked for 2 weeks(14 days)should be 6 weeks, anything 60 days should be 6 months, anything a year should be 3, anything two years should be 6 and anything 3 years should be 9). --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 02:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

That doesnt sound like too bad of an idea... although I usually just default to 5 years for open proxy spam.  Cassandra  (talk) 09:35am  February 2, 2021

Hello, Cassie. You have new messages at User talk:Cassie/protection requests.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 16:50, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

 Protected  Cassandra  (talk) 05:03pm  February 2, 2021

CurateThisPage

AFAICT, you have recently installed the CurateThisPage user script, but why did you choose to install it? JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 17:16, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

I just wanted to see if it works or not... it doesn't quite work, at least on my end. Maybe I'm just too good at breaking everything.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:04pm  February 2, 2021

How does it not work? As in the script, or the interface. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 21:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Colab

Hey Cassie. Don't hesitate to undo some of the changes I made. It's you who started the article and conceptualised it...so if I changed it too much from what you envisions, or if there are lines that don't fit with it or whatever...go ahead and discuss it or just undo them okay? ShabiDOO 17:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Alrighty. Don't worry about it! I'll probably let you know if I undo anything overly significant. Thanks for helping me work on this! It's much appreciated :)  Cassandra  (talk) 07:59pm  February 2, 2021

Request

On the new usergroups thing, I propose two new usergroups. I am for, and will explain why so please copy over if appropriate.

1. IP block exemption The abuse filter blocks as hardblocks, meaning registered users on the same IP as a spambot can't edit. With IPBE, a non spambot user can request the flag and edit behind the blocked IP address. Also, if an account is blocked under 24 hrs, it allows them to edit after the block, due to the autoblock. It will allow open proxies to be hardblocked; any good faith contributor should email an administrator or checkuser to get the flag
2. File mover I am concerned with how many files are being moved and worry if people who don't have experience keep moving them we could have an issue. This could be included in rollback, or be its own thing, but it should involve some trust to be able to move files.

Also, for PCR, replying to MrX's concern-yes, there protected to be in the feature spotlight(some are full protected), but the protection is indef and not 5 days. However, there are other cases, like when a page gets some IP vandalism. As an example, Information was semi protected after one spambot edit; PCR could be used to ensure it never happens again. Yeah, its confusing, but I think its needed. Probably doesn't need a whole usergroup. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Gale5050, semi-protection already takes care of that problem. MrX blow me 19:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

I personally think that IPBE is almost a necessity, but I'm not sure about file mover; maybe restrict it to ECUs? JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 18:45, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

If ECU passes maybe, but I think it requires more trust then that. JJPMaster remember on Wikipedia there are only 407 file movers, compared to 1113 admins. If uncyclopedia has 38 admins, Uncyclopedia shold have ~14 file movers. I'd prefer a more experienced user moving my files, I don't think ECU is enough. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Go ahead and put the others up for a vote if you must, here's how I see it:

1. IP block exemption, has anyone had a problem with this??
2. You are "concerned with how many files are being moved", unless something is wrong with the move log, the last time a file was moved was on January 24th, and the last time a file was moved by someone other than Gale5050 was on January 4th, so again, where's the problem? MrX blow me 19:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

1. IPBE maybe, but it would allow fewer. People turn away when there IP is hardblocked.
2. It doesn't have to be recent; there are pages with broken files. I think I can expect more experienced editors.

--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

IPBE, I'll most definitely bug Lyrithya about it (without a vote) since it seems to be quite essential. As for File Mover permissions, I think that it could just fit slip into Extended Confirmed or Rollback, simply because of how Rollback is basically Uncyclopedia's "in-between-autoconfirmed-and-sysop" userright; although, having a new general purpose "Non-Administrative Privileges" userrole would work well too. I'll think about whether to put it up to a vote later on.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:02pm  February 2, 2021

Please ICU

Home Alone 2: Lost in New York. Way to short.

Also, no one joke banned MrX, so can you do it? I propose 40 seconds, due to his experience.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:11, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

I got the ICU, now I guess I better brace myself... MrX blow me 19:14, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

@MrX: Do you have a RationalWiki account by any chance? JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 19:46, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

No, I think I heard of it once a long time ago, just looked it up now, actually looks like it might be interesting and/or funny? lol MrX blow me

I'll jokeban MrX when the time is right. Now isn't quite yet the best time to pounce... the whole point of a joke ban is for it to be unexpected and funny.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:05pm  February 2, 2021

@JJPMaster: I do have a RationalWiki account... I don't exactly remember the password though. My only page there is a three-liner userpage.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:07pm  February 2, 2021

It'll be funny, no doubt, but it'll never be unexpected. After Trump winning in 2016, the COVID-19 pandemic, and Game of Thrones killing off Ned Stark, I have learned to expect everything. MrX blow me 20:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

We'll see about that.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:12pm  February 2, 2021

But do you remember the username? JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 20:15, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm pretty active on rationalwiki. What is your username? ShabiDOO 20:18, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Yep! Although... I'd rather keep it secret for now so it won't hurt a splode my real-life reputation. Hope you all don't mind.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:19pm  February 2, 2021

Username reveal at 40 CTAM archives? Also, Shabidoo, my RW user page is at here if you want to block me for π×0 seconds. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 20:24, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

More like, uh, once Uncyclopedia finishes Count to a Billion. I guess. Please note that this statement is non-binding.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:40pm  February 2, 2021

Please block the following ranges on Uncyclopedia as open proxy, that have been blocked as spambots

1. 45.77.56.0/22
2. 196.242.57.0/24(see here)
3. 5.180.220.0/22
4. 5.183.92.0/22
5. 192.186.128.0/19
6. 192.3.0.0/16(192.3.116.160 and 192.3.140.66 are both open proxies)
7. 196.196.192.0/22

Thank you. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

That's going to be one huge huff. It might be lethal, but nobody cares. Except everyone on Uncyclopedia. I guess I'll take one for the team.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:08pm  February 2, 2021

Here is another one-23.82.184.0/21.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:44, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Please also huff 193.43.118.0/24 and 178.216.48.0/21 and 212.102.36.0/23. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:39, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

QVFd backlog

it is huge.Please huff all. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:57, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Looking at it now. Thanks for reminding me! I guess things can change a lot in the span of a few hours.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:12pm  February 2, 2021

Please warn User:MOHAMMAD KEPAYET

With uw-spambot. Their userpage is blatant spam, but they seem human, so I think a stern warning would be appropriate.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:28, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

My preference in these situations is to give the user at least 10-20 minutes and see if they make any sort of useful contribution (fat chance), then kindly explain that we're not here to promote ourselves. MrX blow me 20:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

It still feels sus, so I'll check the abuse log to see if a block is warranted.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:31pm  February 2, 2021

No evidence of spam. I'll lower the warning to a L2 as such.  Cassandra  (talk)   

Can I fix uw-spam2? The word "Wikipedia" is mentioned way to much.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:35, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Also, Category:User talk pages with Uw-spam2 notices needs to be created.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Sure! I'll allow you to edit uw-spam1 thru uw-spam4im, and to create their respective categories. Uw-advert series too. No other uw templates for now though.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:38pm  February 2, 2021

Per G14 I won't make the categories. However, I will feel free to if they are used.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Unnecessary disambiguation pages? JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 21:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
And now the user has done more spammy things. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 21:13, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, lol, I meant C2, JJPMaster!--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 21:14, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Please delete

Category:User talk pages with Uw-spam2 notices per C2.No templates no category at least for now.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 21:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

C1 (C2 is speedy renaming) doesn't apply, as this is a maintenance category that, by design, will at some point be empty, much like how we don't delete Category:ICU when it's empty. Have a good day, and may Sophia bless you, JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 21:22, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

But is it really? When do you think uw-spam2 will ever be issued is the question. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 21:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Wait, that's a category redirect, do you mean its target, or the redirect itself? Although I don't object to its deletion, given that that also means we need to create a category for every single template eventually. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 21:28, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Nvm. Yeah, that is a fair point. Maybe the other 2 ones can also be huffed, and merged into a single category-Category: User talk pages with warnings. Also, {{OhDear}} should be mixed in there as well, maybe merged with uw-vandalism1. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 21:33, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll set up some category redirects for this purpose. Category:User talk pages with Uw-spam notices.  Cassandra  (talk) 09:43pm  February 2, 2021

Can you also do that for advertising? And can you check out QVFD again?--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 21:47, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Alrighty, I'll work on both now. Might take a few minutes.  Cassandra  (talk) 09:48pm  February 2, 2021

It certaintly will, as both pages are still not successful. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 21:50, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Actually... I don't think category redirects are possible, as per mw:Help:Categories. I'll set up a category tree instead.  Cassandra  (talk) 09:52pm  February 2, 2021

Category redirects are possible, just discouraged. If you want, you can use {{category redirect}} just for fun. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 21:54, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll probably just put a template saying where the "main" category is. Having a stable category tree is something Uncyclopedia desperately needs.  Cassandra  (talk) 10:05am  February 3, 2021

Gale5050's sanction page

Can you please wrap the "{{Main|User talk:Cassie/Gale5050 sanctions|l1=Gale5050 sanctions}}" thing at /Gale5050 sanctions in <includeonly> tags so that the main article tag doesn't appear on the page itself? Have a good day, and may Sophia bless you, JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 21:53, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

It's done! Now, the {{Main}} should only appear in Uncyclopedia:Flammable's Office.  Cassandra  (talk) 09:55pm  February 2, 2021

Note

If you feel its necessary, feel free to warn me using an uw series. Thanks. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Alrighty. It's unnecessary for now, don't worry about it. I kind of know why you said this though... (wink wink)  Cassandra  (talk) 10:35pm  February 2, 2021

Why? --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

For nuking Uncyclopedia using CTAM.  Cassandra  (talk) 02:43am  February 3, 2021

No, that warrents a few seconds block. But you did that. I guess I'll do it.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:12, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

What have I done...

I was so good at counting that I apparently, almost single-handedly, broke the entire website. I apologize. Have a good day, and may Sophia bless you, JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 22:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Okay. You shattered the record for the longest page on Uncyclopedia, at more than 3,186,533 whole fucking bytes. I had to set up not one, not two, but three seperate archives to fix everything up. But for real... don't worry about it. Just ping me at every 250,000 numbers so nothing breaks too much, and try to limit yourself to 1,000 numbers per edit. That should keep things slightly more tame. Also, I"m sorry, Lyrithya. (I wouldn't be sorry if this were Wikia.)  Cassandra  (talk) 10:34pm  February 2, 2021

Also in the doc why did you say not to transclude templates? – Preceding unsigned comment added by JJPMaster (talk • contribs)

It deflates the page size, making it seem smaller than it actually is. That's why a page could break at ten thousand bytes instead of two million. Also, by the way, since now I have an excuse to block you (because of CTAM), I'll block you for exactly three seconds, as I usually do for joke bans.  Cassandra  (talk) 10:44pm  February 2, 2021

I think it should be 4, because he also forgot to sign. I also think I should be banned for 4 seconds, because I made countless pointless redirects(I made 4, so one for each second). --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:10, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Fair enough. I'll block 'em for an additional second, and I'll also issue a 4 second block for you.  Cassandra  (talk) 02:44am  February 3, 2021

please delete

Uncyclopedia:VFP/Ajohnson.jpg per g8.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done as per QVFD guidelines.  Cassandra  (talk) 10:40pm  February 2, 2021

Please archive

Forum: Count to a million. Archives 39 and 40. It is 2 million bytes. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:09, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

AAAAAAAAA! Once again? Gosh, these users are too fast.  Cassandra  (talk) 02:33am  February 3, 2021

Well... I just added the archive template for CTAB. Archive 40's going to come tomorrow. And Archive 41, and 42, and perhaps 43. That's just a guess though....  Cassandra  (talk) 02:36am  February 3, 2021

You need to archive again. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Goddamnit.  Done.  Cassandra  (talk) 06:16pm  February 3, 2021

You'll have to archive it multiple times a day. Come on, Cassie, and get in on the fun of going into sequence generators and being able to plop thousands of numbers at once! I advise MrX do that as well. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:45, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I can't keep up with you youngins. BTW pings aren't working for me either. This problem seems to come and go for me. MrX blow me 18:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I don't think keeping up at a rate of four or five archives a day is sustainable. Might have to set up a tabbed or dropbox-based archive system, simply because of how bad it is...  Cassandra  (talk) 07:15pm  February 3, 2021

Or wecan pester our sysadmin to allow longer pages, or we can make a limit on how many numbers there is a day. Tbh, I just think we should lower it to 100 million for now. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I'd rather use "Count to a billion" instead of "Count to a hundred million" simply because "CTAHM" sounds worse than "CTAB". No other reason.  Cassandra  (talk) 07:20pm  February 3, 2021

Possible concern

Gayass has an inappropriate username and may need a block/warning asking them to change. Also, please check abuse log. Thanks. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:45, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Abuse log seems all clear; as such, I've left a message welcoming them, but also telling them that they have to let me know what usernsme they would prefer using within the span of a week. If that doesn't happen, then I'll consider applying a softblock.  Cassandra  (talk) 02:42am  February 3, 2021

User:129.126.36.83

Please delete the page he created on QVFD, and warn him with uw-create1. Thanks! --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:03, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I left a welcome and an informal warning just to let them know that one-liners aren't welcome. Hopefully that suffices.  Cassandra  (talk) 06:23pm  February 3, 2021

Forum:Part 2: Proposal to institute term lengths for admins

The page has been unedited for 7 days and is archived, no editing permitted. I think the consensus is to keep the status quo, with the highest score of +6. Indef but with removal had +4.5, and -1 for two years. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I marked the forum to end at midnight on February 8th, so I forcibly unlocked the forum. I'll remind everyone on the Uncyclopedia Discord Server to vote for it, since many users there haven't yet. We'll see where the consensus goes from there on out, but if nothing happens, I'll discuss /w Zombiebaron about how to implement whichever option that is chosen.  Cassandra  (talk) 06:24pm  February 3, 2021

Yeah, we should definitely let it go til the 8th since that's what people had been told. If you're wondering why I haven't voted yet, it's cuz now I'm torn. I still like Cassie's proposal, but CandidToaster brought up a good point that it could deter older admins from returning. It shouldn't, and it would be childish of them to say that don't want to return to read and write if they can't still be admins, but I see that as a possibility. MrX blow me 18:32, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

You could formally vote Abstain.. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:35, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I might. MrX blow me 18:35, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

It's a double-edged sword to require admins to go through VFS again to re-become admins, so we'll see about that. I know some sites are much stricter about demoting inactive admins: Miraheze (wiki farm) demotes stewards after 6 months, as an example. It'll depend on what everyone ends up choosing. Also, don't be afraid to use your "Against" vote too: you can vote one FOR AND one AGAINST, not one or the other. This could help settle tiebreakers if needed.  Cassandra  (talk) 07:11pm  February 3, 2021

Except I can't vote in forums or cast an against vote, unless an exception is granted, without a 1-2 day block. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll allow you to vote specifically in that forum, albeit without a provided reason (only a raw "For" or "Against"). If someone chooses to hunt you down, I'll tell 'em "maybe next time".  Cassandra  (talk) 07:19pm  February 3, 2021

Ok, but I left my reason in the edit summary, hope that's ok. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Gale5050 (talk • contribs)

Should be good. We'll see where the vote ends up!  Cassandra  (talk) 07:34pm  February 3, 2021

Somewhat strange request

Can you make {{title}} automatically add pages to a category, so that I can have a list of the pages that use it, for... reasons? JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 19:08, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm just wondering, before proceeding with your request... is Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Title sufficient? If it isn't then I could add all pages with the title template to a hidden category.  Cassandra  (talk) 07:13pm  February 3, 2021

A category is needed, because I've tried WLH, and it failed miserably. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 19:14, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

In this case I'll set up a hidden category, Category:Pages that use a Title template. It'll be a temporary mesaure though, so please work on it quick! (Putting a template like this consumes a lot of resources that should otherwise be used on CTAB or something else.)  Cassandra  (talk) 07:17pm  February 3, 2021

Please delete the category until I figure out how to make my thing work. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 19:27, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Alrighty, please let me know if you need it back.  Cassandra  (talk) 07:32pm  February 3, 2021

Basically, since my task was a bot task that could affect hundreds of pages at once, I have decided that I should get community approval before unleashing it. I will try it on TestWiki for now. Please keep an eye on these contribs from my bot as well, and block it if it does anything crazy. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 19:57, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Alrighty. I'll put a button on your bot to deactivate it if necessary, so any admin can quickly swoop in.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:06pm  February 3, 2021

Please bold

The 365 days in inactivity. PF4Eva thinks several months is an issue, but its for a full year. Thanks. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:35, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Also, I inform you Hipponias tried a second group, but I suggest it be reverted. There are 3 options. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:35, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll quickly take care of it. I've got another idea in order to compensate for each person's activity level: each person's vote counts for the same amount as the square root of the number of edits they made in 2020, rounded down. A simple example: someone who made 900 edits in 2020 will have their vote count as 30 votes, whilst someone who made just 16 edits will have their vote counted as 4. That should provide a good compromise so inactive admins don't feel disenfranchised.  Cassandra  (talk) 07:39pm  February 3, 2021

Yes, but some people may not know how many edits they made in 2020. Even me, lemme find out. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I should be able to count it manually for everyone who votes. Time consuming for sure, but an acceptable compromise granted the importance of this vote.  Cassandra  (talk) 07:44pm  February 3, 2021

May I ask what is wrong with having four options in a vote? There are 36 options to choose from in Forum:Vote Top 10 of 2020. ~ Hipponias^CUN - Talk - Contribs - Articles  19:44, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I will add that IMO, the way it should work is, is that instead of making it more complicated, the two with the most do a runoff vote(which cost the Republicans the Senate), and see from there in part 3. Otherwise this is gonna go nowhere. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:51, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

The forum was specifically designed to be a ranked-choice vote: you choose your favorite option and vote for it, and then choose your least favorite option and vote against it. 4 choices means 2 choices with no votes, which creates a problem. It's only for this vote though.  Cassandra  (talk) 07:47pm  February 3, 2021

I'll do vote weighting plus a runoff vote for 1 week's time (also weighted the same way) immediately after this forum vote concludes. Hopefully that will be sufficient.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:08pm  February 3, 2021

Yes but you will have to be the one to do all that math ;). --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:14, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

We won't need to do a runoff if one option gets more than 50%, right? MrX blow me 20:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll do one anyways just to be safe. It's the best way to ensure the integrity of this vote. And yes, I'm fine with doing all this math.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:19pm  February 3, 2021

Ok. MrX blow me 20:22, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Time to calculate all of this.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:35pm  February 3, 2021

Uncyclopedia:VFH/HowTo:Walk

Please close as successful. A score of 6/0 and 100% in favor of support. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll close it and schedule it to appear on VFH this Friday (one week since the last VFH featured). Hopefully like this, Uncyclopedia won't go too long between VFHs (like last year, in February).  Cassandra  (talk) 07:45pm  February 3, 2021

K but ya didn't close the voting. (Idk, maybe 4 oppose votes come in).--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm literally using a stationary bike as I'm leaving this message on this talk page. I'll take care of it before 10pm UTC though. Sorry for the delay.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:10pm  February 3, 2021

It's now featured.  Cassandra  (talk) 11:43pm  February 3, 2021

Uh

Check the forum. JJPMaster gave two  For. votes. One or both need to be removed. In addition, he either needs a stern warning, or a block of 3 hours, due to this rule violation. I say a stern warning, as I have done that in the past. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:57, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll RM the vote now and give JJPMaster a quick {{ambox}} in their userpage.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:05pm  February 3, 2021

Uh, it hasn't been done. Hopefully it is in process.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:11, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm working on it right now. Removed the vote just as you were leaving this message on my talk page. Sorry for the delay.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:13pm  February 3, 2021

Please warn Hipponias

and with uw-tpv3. He moved my vote which I removed to a new section. The vote he moved needs to be struck as well, but he can't modify my comments. Also, a uw-tpv4im might be needed. Thanks. And please use section header "February 2021" so it looks more like a warning. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:44, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Why does his vote need to be struck? He only has one vote on the forum now. And that was clearly an accident. Why would he intentionally put an against vote on the option he was voting for? I'll leave a note on his talk page, but accidents like these are just some of the instances where we don't need to go around giving everyone multi-level-warning templates. MrX blow me 21:01, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Agreed with MrX. Being overly bureaucratic will hurt Uncyclopedia.  Cassandra  (talk) 09:20pm  February 3, 2021

But he also moved my vote. See here.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 21:39, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

To make it completely clear, I encountered an edit conflict twice and I got pretty frustrated. I copied my vote over the edit conflict window and I must have copied Gale5050's vote along somehow. I apologise for doing it but it was an accident. ~ Hipponias^CUN - Talk - Contribs - Articles  22:06, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Resolved, then.~--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Vote

You have already departed with our custom of choosing the option with the most votes (on the first round of voting) and arbitrarily decided to hold a run-off. But then during the second round arbitrarily changing the terms of the voting and enacting a weighted vote? We have ALWAYS done one user one vote (.5 for IPs). This is a custom that MUST be decided beforehand and shouldn't be arbitrarily applied to just one vote. If you want to change to a weighted voting system (which I think is a super mega terrible idea) then please start a forum and get the community to decide first (with a 1 vote per user system). Changing the vote in the middle of the second round may have come from good intentions but it was a very bad idea. Please run major changes to the way major site decisions are made, through a voted forum ahead of time. ShabiDOO 22:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

We should also remove the Two-year term lengths with subsequent VFS option, as the only reason to have a second round is to have a run-off with a clear choice between two options. Otherwise we just should have done what we have always done, and choose the option with the most votes in the first round (in which case admins would lose their rights on inactivity). Otherwise...again we would have to have a third round with a run-off if we are being fair. ShabiDOO 22:28, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I agree with Shabidoo on the second point but not the first. People create an account just to vote and should be weighted less. Cassie's forum, so he can make the rules. Sure, it's unusual, but many unusual things happen. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:38, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I will note Shabidoo removed 4 against votes without any (good) reason.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:57, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

The weighted voting system is a one-off (actually, 2-off, since upcoming vote)... the system is additionally made so that people who create an account now only get 0.5 votes, whilst people who edit frequently using IPs can get more than 0.5 votes. I didn't really want to sabotage an election that's already going in place, so.... I'll re-implement the "normal" voting system as well as the "weighted" voting system in parallel, as a compromise. The two-year term option will be removed in a subsequent vote, and a third run-off will occur between Feb. 8 and Feb. 22 for this purpose. Sorry for any confusion. And as for Gale's comment, I'll look into it.  Cassandra  (talk) 10:57pm  February 3, 2021

No...if you want to do weighted voting then start a new forum and change the general policy. You cannot arbitrarily change the way we have always done things because you feel like it (or because you are particularly sensitive about this vote). Zheesh...I mean the worst result from this vote is some admins who never come will have to reapply for admin. This is not a monumental change anyways. We have ALWAYS done one person one vote (IPs get .5). If you want to have a "user's need to have an account for minimum weeks before voting and minimum edits" for policy votes, start a forum and get the community's approval before making this policy. And do it BEFORE we start a vote, not during it. Please respect the way we do things and get community consensus before making such a huge change. If you do start a forum to discuss this, propose something simple (not a multi-tiered voting system) like a minimum account age and minimum edit count. ShabiDOO 23:09, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I've scrubbed off the "vote redesign" stuff for now so it can occur /w a subsequent vote. I know that I may have done this on a whim, in an attempt to point out the disparities shown by admins whom have been inactive for months and "suddenly pop back up" for this purpose. I'll wait until this vote elapses, eliminate the least desirable option, and then subsequently attempt weighted voting for the subsequent runoff vote, to see if it works. Hopefully that is an acceptable way to proceed. My apologies for the insanity today.  Cassandra  (talk) 11:15pm  February 3, 2021

No. We are not doing weighted voting without discussing it with the community first. Start a forum on it ShabiDOO 23:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Fine, I'll initiate one now. It'll take ten minutes.  Cassandra  (talk) 11:20pm  February 3, 2021

@Shabidoo: Here you go. Forum:Weighted voting as an alternative to single-point voting for some votes has been created. Sorry once again for being a shitty admin.  Cassandra  (talk) 11:28pm  February 3, 2021

Cassie, nobody's calling you a shitty admin. We all love you, we all know how hard you work, and we all appreciate everything you do. Seriously, I don't even understand most of the tech stuff you do. But I do disagree with changing the terms in the middle of a vote, and as much I would love to throw down some fat votes (5,000+ edits last year, hey-oh!), I'm also not totally sure that the weighted vote thing is the best thing for everyone. Above all, remember that you kick serious ass, and Praise Sophia. MrX blow me 07:07, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

What Mr.X said :) ShabiDOO 09:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Perhaps I've been doing too much... I'll cease committing voter fraud (and editing the rules midway) from now on. And thanks! :) (praises Sophia)  Cassandra  (talk) 09:45am  February 4, 2021

Please just keep this vote to the two options and let it be done with. The "Admin rights are kept indefinitely" is likely to win anyways. We don't need to have three rounds of voting (that is extreme). ShabiDOO 11:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Alright... I think no one will vote for the 2-year vote option anyway. We'll see how it goes, and February 8th I'll analyze the vote results and subsequently implement anything if required. (If it's the "indefinite rights kept", maybe whether the admin rights should be "stripped and given back upon return automatially" option should be invoked or no, since some users have commented on using such an option, but that's for a seperate vote or something to discuss with the bureaucrats.)  Cassandra  (talk) 01:39pm  February 4, 2021

Please move

Vandalize this page to Uncyclopedia: Vandalize this page, deleting a redirect(per UN:R2)in process. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done. I guess it's a new "sandbox"?  Cassandra  (talk) 12:40am  February 4, 2021

Yeah, this could be merged into UN:SPAM. Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

I might transform it into "a spambox that doesn't get reset, but instead gets archived instead" type of thing. We'll see.  Cassandra  (talk) 02:31pm  February 4, 2021

Assault on Cassie's Talk Page

File:The Bombardment of Cassie.png

Dayummm. ---WohMi, the best damn duelist on this website (talk) 13:35, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

My talk page is currently inflating by around 400 KB a month right now. That's in contrast to last month, where it was around 80 KB. Maybe I'll have to start weekly archives....  Cassandra  (talk) 01:41pm  February 4, 2021

Maybe you have to set up a second account and fully protect this page at times to have them go to the other

one! Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

I think I'm fine with being invaded for now. There's my bot User:Charlie, but I never read that page. As such, please harass me instead of trying to hunt for me-powered sockpuppets!!  Cassandra  (talk) 02:30pm  February 4, 2021

Question

Am I allowed to vote in UN:PFP, on previously featured pictures, as it is technically a part of VFP? Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:11, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Yup! Feel free to vote {{For}} photos there. However, remember that as per your parole conditions, you're not allowed to vote {{Against}}.  Cassandra  (talk) 02:33pm  February 4, 2021

Random awesome video

Since we are assaulting your talk page I thought I'd throw in my favourite ever youtube video! ShabiDOO 14:20, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks!! And AAAAAAAAAA, it fits perfectly within Uncyclopedia's realm of randomness and jokes.  Cassandra  (talk) 02:35pm  February 4, 2021

You don't happen to know how to get the youtube template to work do you? ShabiDOO 15:19, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Honestly, I'm unsure, since it's just a wrapper for the "YouTube extension", which can be invoked using <youtube width="704" height="480"> Video_ID </youtube>... it probably has something to do with the extension itself, in which case unfortunately, because of my lack of sysadmin status, I'm unable to tinker with. I think it has something to do with the youtube extension not liking being used in templates.... Sorry.  Cassandra  (talk) 05:31pm  February 4, 2021

Its works with the template you gave me. Strange huh? ShabiDOO 18:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

It's most definitely a problem with the extension not liking templates. What I gave you wasn't even a template! I guess doing it manually is the only way for now...  Cassandra  (talk) 12:15am  February 5, 2021

About RedWarn

I saw your edit here using RedWarn. May I request you for me to have access after I read the manual? --whytheonlyone (complain?) 14:38, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Sure! But... don't abuse it, or you'll be huffed twice as hard. Information and installation instructions can be found at Uncyclopedia:RedWarn.  Cassandra  (talk) 02:40pm  February 4, 2021

Why I ICU'd the sandbox

Basically I programmed my bot to automatically ICU a page that had any space, but I happened to choose the spambox... and now... I gave up the ICU task and switched to clearing the sandbox instead. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 14:41, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Oh well, bots will be bots. It should be fine. But if your bot breaks stuff, I'll smash (with a good old fashioned hammer) that huge button on its userpage.  Cassandra  (talk) 02:44pm  February 4, 2021

Request as a somewhat negotation

I propose something.

1. I am allowed to vote in the forum for the vote change, but
2. I am banned from nominating any VFH page for 1 week, to keep everything even.(Or there could be a quick block but it won't be held against me for a sanction).

I hope you consider this. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:46, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Oh whoops, I actually won't be back, until slightly after 20:30 in UTC.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:49, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

You know what? Your behavior has reached my expectations during the ten days since I initially applied in the forum, so I'll allow you to edit Forum:Weighted voting as an alternative to single-point voting for some votes without any consequences. This only applies to this specific page though, and not any other forum pages (minus ones you are already eligible to participate in, such as CTAB).  Cassandra  (talk) 06:54pm  February 4, 2021

Gale...you know...I'm sure that not asking the admins to bend the rules and doing things within the bounds of your sanctions will motivate the admins to remove those sanctions sooner. Also Cassie...are you maybe a little overburdened with all the tasks being asked of you? ShabiDOO 19:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Yeah but also, I'm trying to play by the rules, and not make a mistake. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:23, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm fine with being asked all of this. And as for Gale's sanctions, I'm still being somewhat conservative when it comes to where I allow Gale to edit: it's mainly for site-breaking forums (want 'em to have a voice) and other places where a necessity can be demonstrated. I won't lift a larger number of sanctions though, since that defeats the purpose of imposing them in the first place.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:30pm  February 4, 2021

Forum:!RC

I just came here to ask; what the hell did that forum even say? Was it a rant about IRC or something? JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 19:33, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

It literally said "QVFD" and "This page was intentionally left blank" when I deleted it. Looking at the page history reveals that only User:Y, User:Zombiebaron and User:RAHB worked on the page. It was about Y asking why he was banned from IRC; Zombiebaron asking why do the seasons change; and RAHB asking why they are balding.  Cassandra  (talk) 07:50pm  February 4, 2021

You could've turned that into a meme, yet you huffed it. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 20:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Whoopsies. I'll transcribe the contents of the page here just for the sake of evening things out. The thing is, someone might mistakenly search up "Forum:" and see that page, and assume it's a link towards IRC. I'll fix that now.

Extended content

Why was I banned on IRC? —  (talk) (contributions) Jan 24 2013 20:23. Why do the seasons change? -- The Zombiebaron 20:36, 24 January 2013 (UTC) Why am I balding? -RAHB 20:39, 24 January 2013 (UTC) I've been called worse by better. :) —  (talk) (contributions) Jan 24 2013 20:40. You're getting old —  (talk) (contributions) Jan 24 2013 20:41. Idk, ask like frosty —  (talk) (contributions) Jan 24 2013 20:41.

I hope this suffices!  Cassandra  (talk) 12:13am  February 5, 2021

Possible sockpuppetry

I suspect Hipponias and WohMi might be related, due to extreme behavioural similarities(both proposing to keep interstate articles, and this comment screams sock as Hipponias did the PeeReview and WohMi never left that comment. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:48, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

 Unrelated One IP's American, the other's British. Might be similar, but I do not suspect any ducks floating in the river right now.  Cassandra  (talk) 12:21am  February 5, 2021

Me no sockpuppet. Me real human being. ---WohMi, the best damn duelist on this website (talk) 14:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi-Ho, WohMI the Uncyclopedia user here!

That photo doesn't look like a sockpuppet so you get a pass. Remember, I'm not afraid to huff socks - they're just as easy to huff as kittens!  Cassandra  (talk) 04:26pm  February 5, 2021

See discussion at User talk:Gale5050.

Please clear

QVFD. Thanks. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Also please make the other CU templates. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll take care of QVFD now. And as for the CheckUser templates, I'll import them probably tomorrow or on Saturday, it shouldn't take too long. Currently, {{Unrelated}} and {{Duck}} have been implemented: {{Duck}} is a special implementation requiring a tag, CU=true, in order to function as a CU template.  Cassandra  (talk) 01:55am  February 5, 2021

Template:Duck

Because I'm assuming you're referring to w:Wikipedia:The duck test, please add the words "It looks like a duck to me" next to the image of the duck, like w:Template:Duck. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 01:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

I implemented Template:Duck to serve basically as a template to replace Template:Duck, Template:Duck2 and Template:Megaphoneduck on Wikipedia; it essentially serves as a 3-in-1 combo absolute unit. You can invoke the "looks like a duck" using {{Duck|cu=1}}, with alternatively {{Duck|cu=1|2=a}} for the megaphone variant. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Cassie (talk • contribs)

Please huff these IP spambot ranges immediately

1. 193.43.118.0/24
2. 183.88.0.0/16(but please allow account creation, due to this being a pretty long range)
3. 23.82.184.0/21(two spambots on this range!)
4. 172.241.128.0/18(multiple open proxies on this range)

Thanks. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Setting up 5-year blocks for /20-/24 ranges, 1-year ones for /16-/19 ones. All softblocks, /w acc. creation on the /16.  Cassandra  (talk) 05:51pm  February 5, 2021

I feel like all spambots should be checkusers so that there IPs can be blocked too, especially as many spambots might be confirmed to one another. IMO, any range above a /24 should be hardblocked, like if a spambot is on 64.57.284.39 and one is 64.57.284.29, the 64.57.284.0/26 blocked range should be a hardblock, only a soft block at greater then or equal to /24. Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

196.247.212.0/23 needs to be blocked, in the meantime. Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Generally, I check for spambots range mostly via incidental abuse log scumming. It works mainly on the most severe of spambots. The reason why I'm against the idea of mixing long blocks and hard (no-registered-accounts-allowed-either) blocks is because it provides practically no means for allowing anyone accidentally caught in the fire to be unblocked. Once an IP-exempt status is introduced, then it could be used.  Cassandra  (talk) 07:06pm  February 5, 2021

I know. But if only a /28 is blocked, there is practically zero chance anyone but the spambot will be on the range anyway. If a spambot is blocked and checkusered, then there single IP should be hardblocked. Maybe if we only block these proxies for around a month, a hardblock could be used. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

It's more just to be safe. Many other admins, e.g. Zombiebaron, have expressed concern at blocking even single IPs with hardblocks for 5 years, simply because of the possibility of "dynamic IP addresses". 30 days could be fine though, although it's still stretching it a little.  Cassandra  (talk) 09:26pm  February 5, 2021

What I'd recommend is when looking at a range, CU an look who is there. If there are good faith accounts, even one, always softblock. I also feel we should pester a sysadmin for IPBE.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll initiate the pestering once I'm ready to bring to Lyrithya the results of the vote. It's ending in less than 48 hours.  Cassandra  (talk) 12:13am  February 6, 2021

My hard-hitting journalism

Hey! Is it cool if I add UnNews:Activists celebrate Biden's LGBTQ protections to Template:RecentUnNews? I ask because A. I've never put something there before, don't want to just throw it out there if it's not worthy, and B. I don't wanna ruffle any feathers if the subject is too "touchy" for the main page. Let me know what you think, totally cool if it shouldn't be up there. Cheers. MrX blow me 18:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Sure, I wouldn't mind! Feel free to put it on the main page - LGBTQ+ rights are human rights, and anyone whom attempts to deny that may get huffed.  Cassandra  (talk) 07:07pm  February 5, 2021

Sweet, thanks! MrX blow me 19:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

No problem :)  Cassandra  (talk) 07:08pm  February 5, 2021

I’d say it’s odd how Cassie replied at 19:07 UTC and MrX replied within the minute. Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Maybe we're socking, maybe I'm socking with Gale5050 too since I'm replying so quickly. MrX blow me 20:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Are we human? or are we sockpuppet? JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 20:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

My sign is vital, my hands are cold. MrX blow me 21:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

I am not MrX, lol, we're in different time zones!For me its around 4pm and for him its around 1pm. I also am not JJPMaster as that would show up in an enwiki checkuser test. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 21:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed sockpuppet. Psssst, I didn't use checkuser to determine this.  Cassandra  (talk) 09:25pm  February 5, 2021

LOL! And for that, I think we should all have a ban of 40 seconds as that is how long MrX took to show up. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 21:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

(I immediately went to check to see if someone made a fraudulent SPI about me...) JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 22:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, enwiki doesn't take joke SPIs, but if JJPMaster is actually confirmed seriously, having an enwiki SPI is a good idea. Keep in mind we don't have IPv6. My IPv6 range is <not to be disclosed>. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Don't worry, this one was a joke. But for real... I don't have an IPv6 address so I'm stuck with my single IPv4.  Cassandra  (talk) 12:12am  February 6, 2021

Aimsplode and Gale are both socks

Hey Cassie, I'm really certain that Aimsplode and Gale are the same person. They both used the word "and" in several different sentences. Also...they have both voted at one point or another on an article (highly suspicious). Finally...and this is the killer: their names both have the letters "A" and "E" in it. I hardly think that is just a mere coincidence. I think you should do a check-user and if warranted banish both of them from the internet forever (I believe you have the tools to do that as an uncyclopedia admin). Also...I love that beautiful red shade of lipstick you are wearing! ShabiDOO 22:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Wow, these joke SPIs are.....just, but ok, I am not Aimplsode as evidenced by lack of behaviour similarities and vague evidences. But I guess the evidnece against WohMi and Hippo wasn't too great.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

JJPMaster also has "A" and "E", also uses and and also voted in several articles. If I'm a sock, so is he! --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

But has Gale ever changed [[Image:]] to [[File:]] for no apparent reason? JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 22:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

I don't know JJPMaster...it's possible! Cassie...would you mind checking every single edit Gale has ever made to see if (s)he has made any edits which change image: to file:? It would be much appreciated. Thanks doll! ShabiDOO 22:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

I think a normal CU is better. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

As a non-admin who has no clue how to use CheckUser, Technically indistinguishable. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 23:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

As another non admin who has no idea how to use CheckUser, Shabidoo is  Unrelated, JJPMaster and I are  Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely), and Aimsplode is I guess.. Cassie is Technically indistinguishable to JJPMaster, and therefore  Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) to me. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 23:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

And MrX is  Unlikely can someone make those templates?--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 23:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Here's the thing: for real, there is  no way in hell I can find Aimsplode's IP address, simply because too much time has elapsed since Aimsplode last logged onto Uncyclopedia. However, I will keep an eye out to see if Gale is a  waddling duck. I also do like the theory that JJPMaster is somehow a sockpuppet of mine. That, however, I cannot quite confirm... yet.  Cassandra  (talk) 12:16am  February 6, 2021

So basically, Aimsplode is a  Stale? And can someone make that template? --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Yep. And soon^TM.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:30am  February 6, 2021

QVFd backlog

Please clear as all this nonsense unfolds. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Diving right into the dumpster now.  Cassandra  (talk) 12:17am  February 6, 2021

Question-how come you very rarely use the predesigned things? WHat makes you do it sometimes.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

I don't know. Maybe it's just because I can type relatively fast... and because I like to make most Uncyclopedians feel a little more "special" by avoiding autogenerated messages. Also, by the way.... I think I'll archive my talk page once again on Feb 8, alongside the TT2020, that forum and UTOY2020 votes. This dumpyard is filling itself quite fast.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:33am  February 6, 2021

Please ICU

DSU.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Consider it  Done. There was a construction template on that page earlier, so I ignored it then, but it now seems gone. Weird. Doesn't matter because it's now in ICU.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:36am  February 6, 2021

Perhaps a better idea would be to talk about it with the author? That’s a brand new user’s second article. I’ll do some cleanup in the next few days if still necessary. MrX blow me 04:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes but if the author doesn't respond, its longer till its ICU'd and lasts longer. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 12:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

I think in the future, I'll inform noobs on their talk page if I ICU them, and tell them to not fear it (since ICU doesn't mean that an article will be deleted, simply that it still needs to be worked on in order to be kept). After all, UN:BITE.  Cassandra  (talk) 01:00pm  February 6, 2021

Yes, and I will create a nothere page in my userspace.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Please move User:Gale5050/Clearly not here to build Uncyclopedia to mainspace and make a shortcut like UN:NOTHERE. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Gale5050, if you had taken a closer look, you would have seen that the author was already discussing the article (and very open to suggestions) with WohMi and me on the article's talk page. In this kind of situation, it's much better to talk about changes with the author rather than throw a template on the article. MrX blow me 15:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! The article, first of all, has a link to a user pge-a huge no-no that needs to be removed. That whole section should be removed. It's random, unfunny, and kinda gross. Also, the user revealed some PII so this should be RevisionDeleted and the sentence about his grade should be removed as well. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Cross checking the 'personal information' with social security data reveals that there are more than 26,000 males in that age range with the name 'Ben' or 'Benjamin'. I don't know how the hell a would-be criminal/paedophile can track down one person from 26,000, especially without any location data. I'll leave a message on their talk page to tell them about the risk of revealing personal info online, but it does not need to be revdeled unless GameTime4Realz wants it to. ~ Hipponias^CUN - Talk - Contribs - Articles  16:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Please let me know if Revdel is needed. I cannot do Oversight unfortunately, but one is still better than none.  Cassandra  (talk) 04:31pm  February 6, 2021

I'd say to at least remove the PII, then ask the user if they want it RevDel'ed.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

IRL first names should be fine. No guarantees though. It's not as bad as say, disclosing your age or Social Security number online. I'll keep it up unless the aforementioned user wants it removed.  Cassandra  (talk) 04:39pm  February 6, 2021

Does saying your in x grade qualify as age? Maybe we ask the user at least about the dangers of putting your age online?--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

If it's Grade 12 or lesser, lest it is for a GED, it's dangerous. Mentioning college/uni is fine.  Cassandra  (talk) 04:47pm  February 6, 2021

if you check Talk:DSU, you will find your answer ;). --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Initiating revdel now. I replaced the offending text with "bleep bleep". Thanks for letting me know!  Cassandra  (talk) 12:19am  February 7, 2021

Possible socking

Hello, I think MrX and Y might be socks. It's obvious when you look at it. When MrX reverted my edit to UN:CU, how come Y immediately showed up? That's sus! And how come they both reference letters and Wikipedia users? That's sus! This is a joke SPI, referencing the one above. Unfortionately, as Iwho do not know how to use CheckUser and a non admin, I only get a result of I guess.. I want to see if it's Likely, and I can also say that Hipponias is Likely to Shabidoo. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done. My conclusion states that  It looks like a duck to me. Action will be taken if necessary. This is a joke too, please don't de-op me  Cassandra  (talk) 04:33pm  February 6, 2021

Please huff these IP spambot ranges immediately

1. 23.236.224.0/20 (3 years per Wikipedia)
2. 171.22.121.0/24 (35 months per Wikipedia)
3. 45.120.48.0/22 (27 months per Wikipedia)

thanks. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Zuccing them now. Will block for the same amt. of time as Wikipedia, as no-acc-create soft blocks.  Cassandra  (talk) 04:34pm  February 6, 2021

Please block 86.105.183.0/24 for 2 years and 191.101.200.0/23 for 3 years, per WP.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Consider it done.  Cassandra  (talk) 12:50am  February 7, 2021

Uncyclopedia:VFH/queue

No articles lined up. You need to find one! Find a VFH that is eligible and nominate it! --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll try once I've got some time, but we seriously need more people to help write articles and vote for them too. At this rate, one VFH a week would be good.  Cassandra  (talk) 04:41pm  February 6, 2021

Please vote in all options in the revisiting protection forum

And also please broadcast it via IRC or Discord, it ends in a day and I want more editors involved. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll broadcast it to the Discord. As for my own votes, I'll cast them in a few hours.  Cassandra  (talk) 04:42pm  February 6, 2021

Question

Am I allowed to edit Template:RecentUnNews and the anniversaries page solely to add in stuff about interstates/weather/geography? For the recent UnNews, I plan to add the blizzard.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

I've also been realizing, due to my sanctions, I can't communicate, via comments, meaning I am losing support. Can my sanctions be ammended to allow me to comment in VFH's, but only ones that I create, and only VFH's, not VFP's. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

I would highly recommend against this. ShabiDOO 20:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

I literally cannot respond to concerns on this VFH, which is going to cost me support, though I can see Shabidoo's point on a full VFH ban because of these iffy nominations. Still, the 1st request should have no concerns--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Gale, nobody wants to ban you from VFH. But you don't need to respond to every abstain or unfavourable comment (it is better that you do not). My comment isn't going to influence people's votes (almost everyone just reads the article and then makes up their own mind). In any case, that article is not going to get enough votes in the state that it is in. Instead of being defensive, consider asking people who abstain or make unfavourable comments for constructive criticism or feedback so you can improve the article. ShabiDOO 23:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Wouldn't I have to make it....in a comment? --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 23:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

You could pin the user on the talk page of the article...no? ShabiDOO 23:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Unless I hear clairificaiton of Cassie, I ain't risking it-if it isn't specifically in the sanctions, I am not risking a day long block. If he gives an "all clear", I'll do it. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Also pings aren't working for some users-can someone start a help desk?--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Gale, the sooner you accept and respect the sanctions and do your best within those limits, the sooner those sanctions will be lifted. ShabiDOO 00:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes, but these sanctions are actually constraining me so much, it's making it harder to do things to get them lifted. If I can make many articles VFHworthy, that's reason to lift these sanctions; but it requires communication, especially on a questionable VFH like this. If I cannot do this, then it most likely will fail, like Uncyclopedia: VFH/Interstate 95 (2nd nomination), which was 2/3 after 85 days. Though I was able to reply to nearly every comment. Hurricane Rita is in even worse shape than Interstate 95, so I will need to communicate at some point. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

I do understand this, so... if your behavior remains continuously well through February 13th, I'll lift the sanction preventing you from communicating on user talk pages as a Valentine's Day gift. This will only be a partial user talk page permit, and is solely applicable for the purposes of communication and asking for feedback. Please contact the user you wish to ask feedback from in their talk page, and not directly on the VFH and VFP pages. I'll scrutinize your edits to determine whether you are respecting the integrity of other Uncyclopedians, in order to make sure that you're not violating the spirit of the sanctions: keeping Uncyclopedia and its users feeling both safe and welcome, whilst still giving you an opportunity to thrive.  Cassandra  (talk) 12:42am  February 7, 2021

As for Template:RecentUnNews and the Anniversaries pages, I'll allow you to edit them effective immediately. I'll log it in the sanctions page.  Cassandra  (talk) 12:42am  February 7, 2021

I'm trying.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

That's good! Keep it up, you've got this :)  Cassandra  (talk) 01:07am  February 7, 2021

CU policy

Could you, by any chance, include your drafted CU thing in UN:PII? JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 00:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

No, it should be merged into UN:CU.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:30, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

It probably belongs best there anyways. I'll make a mention of Checkuser in UN:PII just to say that admins also must listen to the rules.  Cassandra  (talk) 12:49am  February 7, 2021

Possible socking

Also, I think User:WackyWars is a sock of User:MrX. He shows up on UN:CU-a policy page, and MrX welcomes him, and when I undo his cussing, MrX reverts it. On a behavioural scale, they seem Likely. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

You're really digging deep into the mines, aren't you. Anyways, Confirmed. Note: Joke SPI  Cassandra  (talk) 12:49am  February 7, 2021

[Established user] is a sock(puppet) of [Other, more established user]

I believe that [Established user] is a sock(puppet) of [Other, more established user], because they both [insert obvious thing here], and [insert even more obvious thing here]. Please run a CU, and [insert absurd punishment here].

That was a template for every joke SPI pretty much ever. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 01:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

I believe that JJPMastest is a sock of JJPMaster. Look at their usernames! They only differ by two letters! How can they not be socks? Gotta run a CU on them and subsequently huff them for the length of 69 years and 420 days. Once again, just a joke  Cassandra  (talk) 01:09am  February 7, 2021

The accounts are Confirmed. However, they are a legitimate alternate account, so no blocks should be used unless the bot fucks up.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:13, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Due to this astute observation by Gale5050, can you ensure that any blocks made due to my bot's malfunctioning have autoblock enabled, talk page access revoked, email access revoked, and account creation disabled? Thank you. no JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 01:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

No, it should be if the bot is blocked, he is until he can fix it.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll try my best to not accidentally hard-block you. No guarantees though; if it happens please @ me on Discord so I can resolve it. Pssssst, talk page will be archived tomorrow.  Cassandra  (talk) 01:31am  February 7, 2021

Backlog

Please clear this backlog. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Alrighty, thanks for alerting me! Feel free to use {{tb}} to notify me of anything going on there.  Cassandra  (talk) 01:31am  February 7, 2021

Wow, that exists! --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

It's an oldie but it works just fine.  Cassandra  (talk) 01:36am  February 7, 2021

Please immediately huff

Forum:Intermittens Magazine Uncyclopedia Unfaithopedia Issue 12. Obvious promo material. Please warn them with uw-advert3, since this is in village dump. Thanks.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Since this article/issue/whatevs. seems quite heavily focused on Uncyclopedia, I'll let it stand, but I'll move it to BHOP granted its status as more "off-topic" (and more advert-like). Might even be a good way to attract more people to Uncyclopedia...  Cassandra  (talk) 01:43am  February 7, 2021

About that... some admins have expressed concern over the page in topic, so I'll keep an eye out just in case. For now, nothing too bad.  Cassandra  (talk) 11:12am  February 7, 2021

URGENT

Cassie. Oh my GAWD! I just determined that User:Shabidoo is a sock of User:Shabidoo. It seems both of them have been gallivanting around as the same person for years!!! That means that both User:Shabidoo AND User:Shabidoo have voted multiple times on the same article and have both taken credit for the same VFH articles. I think they should both be thoroughly flogged and then tarred and feathered in a forum (by all members). Let the thrashing begin! ShabiDOO 12:30, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

OH GAWD! Checked and Confirmed. Banning 'em both now for 3 years seconds as punishment. Socking is totally illegal, y'know?  Cassandra  (talk) 12:40pm  February 7, 2021

I think Gale5050 needs to be blocked immediately

They created a lousy VFH for Hurricane Rita, they keep making lousy redirects and VFP noms admins must clean up. I think that they need to be blocked, and for no less then a minute given there 2nd offense.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:13, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Gale5050's block log rationale should also shame them, and include something like "Lousy VFH noms, VFP noms, and pointless redirects-2nd offense". --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:09, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Agreed, proceeding now.  Cassandra  (talk) 07:10pm  February 7, 2021

I was actually online when you blocked me! --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:13, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

File:I was blocked.png

What i saw

Hehe, caught you! I made it exactly 61 seconds in order to comply with your specifications.  Cassandra  (talk) 07:19pm  February 7, 2021

Yeah, it didn't work the last, like 4 times. I think if Gale5050 does anything like this again, there next block should be for 15 minutes. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Probable sockpuppetry

I think that U u u wa wa is a sock of Beer. Both made pointless edits and seem to joke around. Please do a check. They seem I guess., behaviourally. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC) Also, this is a semi serious SPI

Checked, and it seems, strangely enough,  Unrelated. I'll keep an eye out for ducks though.  Cassandra  (talk) 07:12pm  February 7, 2021

Ranges to huff

1. 181.177.96.0/20(Not an open proxy, but a cross wiki spambot at the WMF).
2. 125.235.234.0/23(Cross wiki spambot)
3. 179.61.128.0/18(Colocationwebhost/open proxy, used for crosswiki spam on the WMF)

The first two should be blocked for 6 months and the last for 3 years. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

All three have been blocked for the amounts of time you specified.  Cassandra  (talk) 07:17pm  February 7, 2021

Uh oh, 1.10.188.140 needs to be blocked for a year as a blocked proxy. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:45, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Socking

Hi Cassie, here is my general data of socking from a behavioural/minimal technical POV

1. WackyWars, MrX and Y are all Likely to Technically indistinguishable
2. JJPMaster and Cassie are Technically indistinguishable
3. I and Zombiebaron are  Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) to eachother and the previous group
4. Hipponias is  Unlikely to Shabidoo.
5. Hipponias, in an actual serious SPI, is  Unrelated to WohMi
6. Shabidoo is Confirmed to Shabidoo
7. JJPMastest is Confirmed to JJPMaster
8. Sudux and InsertStephenHere are  Unrelated.
9. Aimsplode is  Stale.

Can you formalize my findings. Psst....joke SPI--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Sure! I might put it in an eventual subpage of UN:CU, in a Yahoo Serious Zone.  Cassandra  (talk) 07:18pm  February 7, 2021

I gotta feeling we should make UN:SPI for serious SPIs and use your talk page for joke ones so you don't get confused.

Psssssssssssssssssst... I think Zombiebaron  It looks like a duck to me with Arthur given enwiki behaviour. But I believe they are  Unrelated. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Ultimate sock

Hi Cassie, I'm really sorry to tell you this but it turns out that almost every user except for User:Gale5050 is a sockpuppet of the same person. That means one creepy guy sitting in his parents basement is behind users such as: CandidToaster, Cat the Colourful, Frosty, Hipponias‎‎, Jacobw‎ , JJPMaster‎, Leverage, Lolerwilde, Lyrithya, Morpheus , MrX, PF4Eva, RealLifeCartman, Rozocran, Supergeeky1, Unicode, WohMi‎, Zombiebaron. Unfortunately it appears as though I myself am one of these people. Even worse...it seems that you too (Cassie) are just a sock of this same guy. It seems that Gale isn't. This would mean all votes in the last several years have been fraudulent, that nearly all VFH need to be stipped of their featurehood...and that just about every user other than User:Gale5050 needs to be permanently banned. I know this will mean a lot of work for you and the permanent end of your account here...but I think it is for the greater good. Sock fuckery cannot be allowed. My condolences. ShabiDOO 17:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

I do not think so. We even confirmed WohMi is not Hipponias, InsertStephenHere is not Sudux, and so on. I can confirm Zombiebaron and Cassie are in ET, though. If Zombiebaron and Cassie(CassieTYD on enwiki)are the same as JJPMaster, it must be filed in an enwiki SPI. Shabidoo, please do the honors. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Oh gosh, this is getting long. There's too many accounts to huff! I could ask Lyrithya to SSH into the server and do sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root /, but then Gale will be blocked too (because collateral damage).... AAAAAAAAA!  Cassandra  (talk) 07:23pm  February 7, 2021

...and everyone else. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 19:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Yep... including Sophia, which is, well, dangerous.  Cassandra  (talk) 07:26pm  February 7, 2021

(ec)Let's do it! But only for a time no more then 5 milleniaminutes. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry to clutter up your tp more, but....

Can you move User:Gale5050/Clearly not here to build Uncyclopedia to Uncyclopedia:Clearly not here to build Uncyclopedia and make an UN:NOTHERE shortcut? --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Also please check your protection requests. I made....like 7.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll port them both over in some time. Too busy to do so now though... once again, I have to invoke my "stationary bike excuse". I'll have everything taken care of before midnight UTC though.  Cassandra  (talk) 07:24pm  February 7, 2021

Ok, first off, Gale5050, this seems like another situation where you might have written an essay/policy about yourself. Second, what is the point of this? Some of it seems like a joke, some of it seems like a serious but vague set of guidelines for blocking users and/or initiating CU's. Can someone please explain it to me? Otherwise I think we should huff it. MrX blow me 20:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Honestly, I cannot establish it as an official policy because of Uncyclopedia's more laid back nature. The reason is too vague, and may also violate UN:BITE, so I'm doubtful it'll get accepted by the wider Uncyclopedia community. At the most, I could label it as a non-binding essay. As for page protection, I'll look into that soon(TM).  Cassandra  (talk) 08:54pm  February 7, 2021

Essay is fine. To JJPMaster-um, not everything can be categorized.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll take care of it now then, but ensuring that this stays an essay and does not get promoted to ignorable polocy without supermajority consensus.  Cassandra  (talk) 10:37pm  February 7, 2021

Please revisiondelete

[1]. Made by a spambot on a range now blocked as a blocked proxy. Similar to on Information. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:30, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Speaking of Information, that IP spambot was in the range 162.253.128.0/22, blocked as a blocked proxy for 3 years. Yoy can do the honors. Though that one IP who did make the edit should have the block commuted to 3 years as it may switch, especially if TPA is turned off. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Range blocked for 3 years, IP not commuted, revision revdel'd.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:35pm  February 7, 2021

Also, you should create Uncyclopedia:Revision delete. It would come in handy.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll make it a short stub at least. Also make Oversight redirect there.  Cassandra  (talk) 10:44pm  February 7, 2021

Please check Category:Requests for unblock

Backlog; 15 requests. Please use tl to disable them, and to leave accept/decline comments. Thanks.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:19, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Also, please remove TPA from WpSearchUser (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:19, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Taking care of all of it now. Gosh, Uncyclopedia needs heavy maintenance.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:37pm  February 7, 2021

WpSearchUser's TPA was rightfully revoked. Their TP was deleted. 14 more to go!--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Uh, Cassie, when you're done, please revisit User talk:37.150.217.9. You, um, probably need to do a fix. Probably worth saying their block is 1 yr now. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
Also could you please revision-delete all revisions of User talk:Portugal between Special:Permalink/5778587 and the latest revision? JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 20:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

And can you revoke TPA for 66.165.239.58, 92.47.182.222 and 1.10.188.140, and ammend the block log rationale to add "TPA revoked due to spam. Use Discord or IRC to request an account be created for you". Thanks, --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

So much bureaucracy. Taking care of it now...........  Cassandra  (talk) 08:55pm  February 7, 2021

Also Cassie could you please RST the PRF servers and X2#@ the RTQ1 Derpity derps? Also could you please find time to shave my balls tonight? They are getting finds of scruffy. Thanks. ShabiDOO 23:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

How about someone create UnNews: Super Bowl XV? It's tonight. In the Kitten Bowl from 19:00-21:00 UTC, the Longtains beat the Bengals 21-15, but that isn't as notable as the superbowl .--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 23:19, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Nvm. I am collecting facts and will create an UnNews article tomorrow in my userspace and request you move it to mainspace. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 23:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Alrighty!  Cassandra  (talk) 12:00am  February 8, 2021

Please create

Please create Category:Blocked users without talk page access. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 23:01, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done by Cassie. Please also check the protection requests I made for you.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 23:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Please pull TPA from User:Alden Loveshade and User:Aimsplode

No TPA abuse yet, and no email abuse, but given they are permanetly banned and never coming back, no reason to have TPA on. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 23:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

'Tis done, also added links in the block message to make things easier.  Cassandra  (talk) 12:00am  February 8, 2021

Page archived 02.08.2021